Camanay and Denosta Thesis
Camanay and Denosta Thesis
Camanay and Denosta Thesis
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
ones, to suit the needs of the consumers who have been keen
of food products.
sweet potatoes.
liking.
cupcakes.
following:
cost.
other ingredients.
T3- canned coconut milk, and T4- fresh coconut milk. The
Definition of Terms
2010).
1997).
2008).
ILOILO STATE COLLEGE OF FISHERIES-DINGLE CAMPUS
College of Hospitality Management
each treatment.
ILOILO STATE COLLEGE OF FISHERIES-DINGLE CAMPUS
College of Hospitality Management
the tongue.
CHAPTER II
Coconut Milk
two PCs with HCA could classify the 12 samples into five
10
blended with 15% skim milk powder was compared with cow
milk. The results showed that this blend had slightly low
2004).
11
12
(Samiha, 2015).
13
14
wheat flour + 12.5% orange flour (WF + OF), and wheat flour
15
culinary chef said that one can mix fruits, together with
exciting flavors.
recipe.
ILOILO STATE COLLEGE OF FISHERIES-DINGLE CAMPUS
College of Hospitality Management
16
from live strong team, she said that healthy food choices
17
CHAPTER III
METHODOLOGY
Materials
flour, 1 cup fresh coco milk, 150 grams powdered coco milk,
evaluation sheets.
Methods
4- Fresh Coconut.
18
Table 1
Standard Recipe of Steamed Sweet Potato Cupcake
Control 2 3 4
19
20
samples independently.
21
Data Collected
factor.
particular taste.
sense of smell.
ILOILO STATE COLLEGE OF FISHERIES-DINGLE CAMPUS
College of Hospitality Management
22
23
CHAPTER IV
4 (fresh coconut milk) with 7.05 was also “chewy”. Over all
24
Table 2
Treatment Trial
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
ns= not significant
CV= 6.16%
25
26
Table 3
Treatment Trial
Legend:
Numerical range Descriptive Rating
8.50-9.00 fluffy
7.50-8.49 bouncy
6.50-7.49 smooth
5.50-6.49 moist
4.50-5.49 neither moist nor dry
3.50-4.49 dry
2.50-3.49 rough
1.50-2.49 rancid
1.00-1.49 bland
ILOILO STATE COLLEGE OF FISHERIES-DINGLE CAMPUS
College of Hospitality Management
27
means.
ILOILO STATE COLLEGE OF FISHERIES-DINGLE CAMPUS
College of Hospitality Management
28
Table 4
___________________________________________________________
Treatment Trial
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
29
30
Table 5
Trial
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
31
7.19 or “yellow” was the color liked by the taste panel for
32
Table 6
___________________________________________________________
Yellow
33
Overall Liking
perfect taste that the taste panelists like the most while
had a mean of 6.93 and T-4 (fresh coconut milk) with 7.23
34
Table 7
__________________________________________________________
Treatment Trials
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
ns=not Significant
CV=6.72
35
Table 8
___________________________________________________________
Acceptability
Cost of Production
coconut milk).
ILOILO STATE COLLEGE OF FISHERIES-DINGLE CAMPUS
College of Hospitality Management
36
Table 9
Treatments
Ingredients 1 2 3 4
Cake flour 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
Sweet potato 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00
Dairy milk 50.00
Powdered coconut 25.00
Coconut in can 50.00
Fresh coconut milk 25.00
Baking powder 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Brown sugar 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00
Egg 16.00 16.00 16.00 16.00
Baking cups 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00
Total cost 127.00 102.00 127.00 102.00
Standard yield 40 40 40 40
Cost per serve 3.17 3.17 3.17 3.17
Selling price 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00
Price for 40 servings 280.00 280 280.00 280.00
Food cost 45% 51% 45% 51%
Profit 153.00 98.00 153.00 98.00
ILOILO STATE COLLEGE OF FISHERIES-DINGLE CAMPUS
College of Hospitality Management
37
CHAPTER V
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
Summary
Hedonic scale.
findings:
38
panel.
Conclusion
39
Recommendation
40
REFERENCES
41
42
43
APPENDICES
ILOILO STATE COLLEGE OF FISHERIES-DINGLE CAMPUS
College of Hospitality Management
44
Appendix A
DATA-GATHERING INSTRUMENT
THE RESEARCHERS
Name
(Optional):______________________________________________________
1. Sex 2. Occupation
[ ] Male [ ] Student
[ ] Female [ ] Faculty/Staff
---------------------------------------------------------------
A. Appearance
45
B. Texture
C. Odor
D. Color
46
E. Taste
F. Overall Liking
Moderately
Moderately
Very Much
Extremely
Extremely
Like Very
Like Nor
Slightly
Slightly
Neither
Dislike
Dislike
Dislike
Dislike
Dislike
Much
Like
Like
Like
ILOILO STATE COLLEGE OF FISHERIES-DINGLE CAMPUS
College of Hospitality Management
47
Appendix B
Univariate Analysis of Variance of Appearance
___________________________________________________________
Sv ss df ms f Sig.value
__________________________________________________________
Corrected 1.465a 3 .488 2.773 .111
model
Intercept 556.786 1 556.786 3162.058 .000
Trmts 1.465 3 .488 2.773 .111
Error 1.409 8 .176
Total 559.659 12
Corrected 2.873 11
total
___________________________________________________________
Appendix C
Univariate Analysis of Variance of Texture
___________________________________________________________
Sv ss df ms f Sig.value
___________________________________________________________
Corrected 681a 3 .277 1.543 .277
model
Intercept 541.766 1 541.766 3680.270 .000
Trmts .681 3 .277 2.773 .277
Error 1.178 8 .147
Total 543.626 12
Corrected 1.859 11
total
___________________________________________________________
ILOILO STATE COLLEGE OF FISHERIES-DINGLE CAMPUS
College of Hospitality Management
48
Appendix D
Univariate Analysis of Variance of Odor
___________________________________________________________
Sv ss df ms f Sig.value
___________________________________________________________
Corrected 674a 3 .225 1.579 .269
model
Intercept 540.692 1 540.692 3801.220 .000
Trmts .674 3 .225 1.579 .269
Error 1.138 8 .142
Total 542.504 12
Corrected 1.812 11
total
___________________________________________________________
Appendix E
Univariate Analysis of Variance of Taste
___________________________________________________________
Sv ss df ms f Sig.value
___________________________________________________________
Corrected 1.484a 3 .495 3.859 .056
model
Intercept 592.067 1 592.067 4619.509 .000
Trmts 1.484 3 .495 3.859 .056
Error 1.025 8 .128
Total 594.576 12
Corrected 2.509 11
total
___________________________________________________________
ILOILO STATE COLLEGE OF FISHERIES-DINGLE CAMPUS
College of Hospitality Management
49
Appendix F
Univariate Analysis of Variance of Color
___________________________________________________________
Sv ss df ms f Sig.value
___________________________________________________________
Corrected 1.484a 3 .495 3.859 .056
model
Intercept 592.067 1 592.067 4619.509 .000
Trmts 1.484 3 .495 3.859 .056
Error 1.025 8 .128
Total 594.576 12
Corrected 2.509 11
total
___________________________________________________________
Appendix G
Univariate Analysis of Variance of Overall Liking
___________________________________________________________
Sv ss df ms f Sig.value
___________________________________________________________
Corrected .397a 3 .132 .578 .646
model
Intercept 615.044 1 615.044 2688.325 .000
Trmts .397 3 .132 .578 .646
Error 1.830 8 .229
Total 617.271 12
Corrected 2.227 11
total
___________________________________________________________
ILOILO STATE COLLEGE OF FISHERIES-DINGLE CAMPUS
College of Hospitality Management
50
Appendix H. DOCUMENTATION
Preparation of Ingredients
ILOILO STATE COLLEGE OF FISHERIES-DINGLE CAMPUS
College of Hospitality Management
51
BIOGRAPHICAL DATA
Age : 21
Citizenship : Filipino
Parents
School Attended
(2009-2010)
(2013-2014)
(2018-2019)
Restaurant Management
ILOILO STATE COLLEGE OF FISHERIES-DINGLE CAMPUS
College of Hospitality Management
52
BIOGRAPHICAL DATA
Age : 21
Iloilo
Citizenship : Filipino
Parents
School Attended
(2010-2011)
(2018-2019)
Restaurant Management