The Fresnel Biprism: David-Alexander Robinson Jack Denning Daniel Tanner 08332461 10th December 2009

The Fresnel Biprism
David-Alexander Robinson ∗; Jack Denning; Daniel Tanner

08332461
10th December 2009
Contents
1 Abstract 2
2 Introduction & Theory 2

2.1 Young’s Slits Experiment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2.2 The Fresnel Birpism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3 Experimental Method 4
4 Results & Analysis 5
5 Error Analysis 5
6 Conclusions 6
∗
David-Alexander
c Robinson
1
1 Abstract
In this experiment the wavelength of Sodium Light was measured using
the so called Fresnel Biprism method. This has several advantages over the
traditional Young’s Slits method. The wavelength of the sodium light was
found to be 6.1 × 10−7 ± 1.6 × 10−7 m, which is within experimental error of
the accepted value of 5.9 × 10−7 .
2 Introduction & Theory

2.1 Young’s Slits Experiment
When two coherent light sources of equal amplitude meet they set up
an interference pattern consisting of a succession of bright and dark fringes.
This is known as constructive and destructive interference respectively.
Figure 1: The Young’s Slits Experiment
In Young’s Slits experiment, a single source is split in two, to make two

coherent sources. By diffraction the two sources interfere with each other
and the resultant image as described above can be projected onto a screen.
The distance between two successive fringes is given by
S = ym+1 + ym (1)
2
The wavelength λ of the light used can then be found by using the formula
λL
S= (2)
d
2.2 The Fresnel Birpism

A Fresnel Biprism is a variation on the Young’s Slits experiment. The
Fresnel biprism consists of two thin prisms joint at their bases to form an
isosceles triangle. A single wavefront impinges on both prisms; the left por-
tion of the wavefront is refracted right while the right segment is refracted
left. In the region of superposition, interference occurs as here two virtual
sources exist.
Figure 2: The Fresnel Biprism
For the Young’s slits experiment, we must approximate that the slits act
as point sources. This however is not the case, since the slits have finite width.
This finite size of the secondary slits gives rise to unwanted diffraction effects
which causes errors. The Fresnel biprism overcomes this problem of extended
secondary slits by replacing them with virtual slits which are point-like.
As this experiment is analogous to Young slits, the formula above holds
with the minor exception that d can not be measured directly since the two
slits are purely virtual. Instead, d is determined by placing a converging lens
3
between the biprism and the screen and forming real images of the virtual
slits on the screen. From the magnification formula
d1 v1 d2 v2 u1
= and = =
d u1 d u2 v1
we find that
q
d= d1 d2 (3)
Putting this into the Young’s Slits equation gives
√
S d1 d2
λ= (4)
L
3 Experimental Method
The sodium lamp was turned on and allowed to warm up.
The light source, the slit, the biprism and the eyepiece were set up such
that they were all in line and at the same height. The slit and the biprism
edge were ensured to be parallel.
The biprism was then placed 15 to 20cm from the slit, and using only
ones eye, the biprism was rotated slightly until a fringe pattern could be seen
through it.
This was then repeated using the eyepiece to obtain the best visibility
of the fringes.
Finally, the eyepiece was moved to a distance of 1.12m from the slit,
and the lens was placed between the biprism and the eyepiece. A sheet of
paper was then used as a screen to check that sharp images were formed at
two positions.
The lens was then removed, and S was measured. To do this, the
distance across about 20 fringes was measured a range of times and an average
value was calculated.
The lens was then put back in place, and d1 and d2 were measured.
4
The wavelength λ of the sodium light was then calculated using the
above equation.
4 Results & Analysis

The following data was recorded
Parameter value
L 1.12 ± 0.01m
d1 4.0 ± 0.5mm
d2 1.0 ± 0.5mm
S1 5.63 ± 0.00028mm
S2 5.572 ± 0.00033mm
S3 5.549 ± 0.00031mm
This gives an average value for S of 0.341 ± 0.026mm, and we find d =

2.00 ± 0.52mm.
Therefore we get λ = 6.1 × 10−7 ± 1.6 × 10−7 m.
5 Error Analysis
We have the following errors,
d2 ∆d1 + d1 ∆d2
∆d =
2d
= ±0.52mm
∆s
∆S = √
3
= ±0.026mm
" #
∆d ∆S ∆L
∆λ = λ + +
d S L
= ±160nm
However, the main source of error in this experiment is that involved

with counting the number of fringes measured. This was estimated to be ±2
fringes per measurement.
5
6 Conclusions
By using the Fresnel Biprism method we were able to calculate the
wavelength of the sodium light was to be 6.1 × 10−7 ± 1.6 × 10−7 m, which is
within experimental error of the accepted value of 5.9 × 10−7 . This method
is more accurate than the Young’s Slits method, however, a better method
of calculating the fringe separation would yield an even more accurate result.

The Fresnel Biprism: David-Alexander Robinson Jack Denning Daniel Tanner 08332461 10th December 2009

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

The Fresnel Biprism: David-Alexander Robinson Jack Denning Daniel Tanner 08332461 10th December 2009

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

The Fresnel Biprism: David-Alexander Robinson Jack Denning Daniel Tanner 08332461 10th December 2009

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

The Fresnel Biprism

David-Alexander Robinson ∗; Jack Denning; Daniel Tanner

2 Introduction & Theory 2

4 Results & Analysis 5

2 Introduction & Theory

Figure 1: The Young’s Slits Experiment

In Young’s Slits experiment, a single source is split in two, to make two

2.2 The Fresnel Birpism

Figure 2: The Fresnel Biprism

4 Results & Analysis

This gives an average value for S of 0.341 ± 0.026mm, and we find d =

However, the main source of error in this experiment is that involved

You might also like