Ashok Leyland IAQ Quality Sustainability Award Summary

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 1

One Page Summary

Phosphate Sludge Generation Reduction


Name of the Project: Phosphate Sludge (hazardous waste) generation reduction in Cabin pre-treatment line
Name of the Organization hosting the project: Ashok Leyland Ltd. (India)
UN Sustainability Development Goal affected: Goal 12: Responsible Consumption and Production
Introduction:
In Commercial Vehicle manufacturing, painting is one of the important process which generates sludge (hazardous
waste). At Ashok Leyland, we comply with all transportation and disposal rules related to the waste management
standard (prevalent in the country). While adhering to compliances, being a responsible organization, we are
continually innovating to reduce waste generation. One such project at our Hosur-2 plant is explained here.
Essence of the project and Problem statement:
In its regulation, State has given the authorized limit for waste generation which is 300MT/annum for paint sludge
and 24 MT/annum for phosphate sludge. At Hosur plant, Paint sludge generation was well within the authorized
limit whereas, Phosphate sludge generation (Hazardous Waste) was a concern nearing to the authorized limit.
Going forward, there was a risk to cross this limit as production volumes were predicted to be higher by 20% in
FY20. Project has been started with the objective of reducing Mean Phosphate sludge generation from 6.92 g/sq.m
to 4 g/sq.m.
Methodology used: Six Sigma DMAIC
Observation and Analysis :
We performed Measurement system analysis (MSA) for
titration checking method (Phosphate sludge measurement
process) to verify whether the measurement system is
capable. Results suggests that the measurement system is
capable as Gage R&R is 0.66% and No. of distinct categories
(NDC) are 214 i.e. project metric data is accurate & precise.
Nine probable causes are identified for high phosphate
sludge generation. Detailed cause validation reveals that
moisture content present in Phosphate sludge is very high
(61% of sludge weight).
Improve (Finding, Implementing the solutions with
resource used):
1. To address this issue of high moisture content in
Phosphate sludge, drying bed is installed, and drying process
is continued. As a result, Mean Phosphate sludge generation
reduced from 6.92 g/sq.m to 5.22 g/sq.m.
2. Even with improved performance, projected annual Pp = 1.98
sludge generation level will be 26 MT against the Govt. Ppk = 1.83
regulation of 24 MT considering 20% higher production
volumes.
To further reduce sludge generation, we went for an
innovative solution of using less coating weight, which was
possible with usage of a different ‘Pre-treatment Chemical’.
From our research, ‘compact & fine phosphate coating chemical’ was found most suitable for this process. After
implementation, Mean Phosphate sludge generation is reduced to 4 g/sq.m. With this, estimated annual sludge
generation will be 20 MT against the Govt. regulation of 24 MT even for 20% higher production volume.
As part of risk analysis, we checked if there’s any adverse impact on Consequential metric (Phosphate coating
weight). Phosphate coating weight process is stable and capable as Ppk is 1.83.
Results and Effects (few):
Phosphate Sludge generation
1. Mean Phosphate sludge generation reduced from 6.92 g/sq.m to 4 8
g/sq.m 55% Reduction

2. Phosphate coating weight process is stable and capable as Ppk is 1.83. 6 6.9 6.8
g/sq.m

3. Phosphating process time reduced from 90 sec. to 60 sec. Productivity


4 5.2 4
improved by 12%. 4.8
4. DM water requirement reduced from 180 KL to 120 KL per annum.
2
5. Financial benefit of INR 5.25 Million.
Jan'19

Feb'19
Before

FY19Q2

FY19Q3

6. Reduction of carbon footprint because of energy consumption


reduction.
Resources used: Expenditure of INR 0.1 Million for Phosphate sludge
drying bed construction.
Locking & Cloning the Improvements: Operation controls procedures are changed, and training has been given
to all associated members. Detailed case study is shared and communicated to all plants of Ashok Leyland.
Tools used in the project: Variable MSA (GRR study), Pugh matrix, Test of Hypothesis (2 sample t-test), Process
capability studies, Variable Control charts, Risk analysis.

You might also like