Orifice Chamber
Orifice Chamber
Orifice Chamber
Design principles. An OC typically contains four to eight in downstream equipment—DDSVs, OCs, CO boilers/flue gas
grids with nozzles of 1-in. to 2-in. diameter, depending on unit coolers—can be caused by high gas velocities and the presence
capacity and the required pressure drop. The pressure drop of catalyst fines. Erosion of orifice nozzles further aggravates
across each grid can be calculated using Eq. 1 and Eq. 2: catalyst loss from the regenerator and can be caused by inferior
fresh catalyst properties, pressure fluctuations and damage of
( )
2
v 2 1 A f A p R-R hardware internals, among others. An active open area in
∆P = (1) the orifice grids increases due to erosion, which reduces the OC
2g cC 2Y 2 pressure drop. This increases the pressure drop requirement
where: across the DDSV.
ΔP Pressure drop through plate, kg/cm2
v Velocity through orifice, m/sec Troubleshooting through debottlenecking. Debottleneck-
ρ Gas density at upstream condition conditions, kg/m3 ing is the removal of any obstacles or constraints in any equip-
Af Orifice plate free area, m2 ment, plant or process to increase efficiency and workability,
Ap Orifice plate area, m2 improve conversion, selectivity and reliability, and troubleshoot
gc 9.81 m/sec2 specific problems. The most important aspect of debottleneck-
C Discharge coefficient ing any equipment or unit is the capture of performance data
Y Compressibility factor through a controlled and comprehensive test run. Three case
studies on the debottlenecking of OCs in different Indian Oil
0.586339 + 0.658563 (t / D) Corp. FCCUs are presented here.
0.34458 (t / D)2 0.057288 (t / D)3
C= (2) Case study 1. The first case study is on the reliability improve-
(P / D)0.1 ment of an FCCU operated in distillate mode with a partial
where: combustion regenerator. The unit was revamped to 150% by ex-
t Plate thickness panding the regenerator capacity and associated modifications,
D Hole diameter including the feed injectors. Furthermore, the main fractionator
P Hole pitch. and gas concentration sections were debottlenecked to enhance
Eq. 2 is valid for a t/D ratio between 0.4 and 2.4, and a feed throughput by an additional 20%.
Reynolds number between 4,000 and 20,000. The volumetric The unit was experiencing high catalyst loss due to higher su-
flowrate of flue gas increases from one orifice grid to the other perficial velocity in the regenerator due to higher feed through-
due to pressure reduction. Accordingly, the required number of put. Apart from severe erosion in cyclones due to high catalyst
nozzles are kept open to maintain uniform velocity across the loss, the unit was also facing the challenge of a low DDSV open-
orifice grid. Excessive velocity at the orifice grid is avoided to ing. The pressure drop across the DDSV was almost twice the
minimize damage of the OC grids. design value. As the problem was aggravated over a period of op-
The quantity of flue gas passing through the DDSV and eration, the DDSV opening gradually reduced to 3%–4%, lead-
OC can be estimated by material and energy balance calcula- ing to an unplanned unit shutdown. The DDSV discs and sup-
tions. Similarly, pressure drop across the DDSV and OC can be port guider were severely damaged. Due to the erosion of the
worked out based on single-gauge pressure survey data. Erosion guider, one of the discs was dislodged downward, increasing the
TABLE 1. Case 1: Plugging of grid nozzles TABLE 2. Case 2: Plugging of grid nozzles
Before modification Recommended Before modification Recommended
Feed throughput, 120 120 Feed throughput, 105 105
% of design % of design
Reg. pressure, kg/cm2g 3.2 3.2 Air to reg., kg/h 14,400 13,000
3 2
Air to reg., Nm /h 108,000 108,000 Reg. pressure, kg/cm g 1.95 2.2
Opening, % 4 25 Opening, % 5 30
DDSV DDSV
2 2
ΔP, kg/cm 1.45 1.2 ΔP, kg/cm 0.8 0.72
ΔP across OC, kg/cm2 2.35 2.64 ΔP across OC, kg/cm2 1.1 1.35
No. of nozzles ΔP No. of nozzles ΔP No. of nozzles ΔP No. of nozzles ΔP
2 2
Open Closed kg/cm Open Closed kg/cm Open Closed kg/cm Open Closed kg/cm2
2
40JULY 2017 | HydrocarbonProcessing.com
Refinery of the Future
vertical gap between the discs. This essentially provided more After examining the unit operating data, unlike Case 1, the
flow area, as compared to the indication of the DDSV opening. pressure drop across the OC was found to be higher, even at
The higher pressure drop across the DDSV was mainly due normal feed throughput. The blockage of some nozzles was the
to higher regenerator pressure to accommodate incremental suspected cause of the higher pressure drop. During an inspec-
feed throughput. Incidentally, measures such as the inclusion tion of the OC, it was found that the nozzles were blocked by
of an additional orifice and the plugging of nozzles in an exist- refractory debris. The orifice grid before and after cleaning is
ing OC were not implemented during the revamp to achieve shown in FIG. 3 and FIG. 4, respectively.
the required pressure drop. Due to the passing of catalyst fines During subsequent operation, the DDSV opening was grad-
with flue gas, severe erosion of nozzles in the OC was observed, ually reduced to 3%–7%, along with an increase in pressure
particularly on the initial grids. An increase in active flow area drop across the OC that clearly indicated the erosion of DDSV
reduced the pressure drop across the OC, thereby increasing discs. Based on plant operating data, plugging 21 nozzles in the
the DDSV pressure drop. OC was recommended (TABLE 2), and this was implemented
The Indian Oil refinery was looking for a solution to the during the next opportunity shutdown. These resulted in the
problem of the low DDSV opening. Within the limited shut- restoration of feed throughput, while maintaining the opening
down time, modification of the 3rd and 6th grids was not pos- of the DDSV around 30% and an increase in OC pressure drop
sible due to inadequate accessibility. To overcome this prob- from 1.1 kg/cm2 to 1.5 kg/cm2.
lem, some of the nozzles on the 1st, 2nd, 4th and 5th orifice
grids, as shown in TABLE 1, were plugged as a temporary solution Case study 3. Another case of OC operation debottleneck-
rather than nozzle restoration. The nozzles were made circular ing was carried out in a resid reactor plus two-stage regenera-
by welding externally machined plates with the required orifice tor (R2R)-type FCCU with two DDSVs and one OC placed
size. FIG. 1 and FIG. 2 show the nozzles before and after repair of
the OC, respectively. Installation of an additional three grids
was recommended as a long-term solution for healthy opera-
tion of the OC and DDSV.
After implementation, the DDSV opening was found to
improve from 3%–4% to 25%–30% due to an increased pres-
sure drop across the OC. The pressure across the DDSV was
reduced from 1.45 kg/cm2 to 1.2 kg/cm2. Stable opening of the
DDSV was also noticed, and the same operation continued for
more than 3 yr without additional maintenance.
42JULY 2017 | HydrocarbonProcessing.com