Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 970 views

    Project Title/Business Name: A Feasibility On Memorial Garden Group Members: Tiansing, Cesar Et Al

    Uploaded by

    Roel Jr Pinaroc Dolaypan
    This document contains a rubric for grading a feasibility study on a proposed Memorial Garden project. The rubric assesses the quality of content, organization and presentation. For content, it evaluates the market assessment, technical assessment, organization and management assessment, and financial and socio-economic assessments. It allocates 60 points for content. For organization, it assesses mechanics, layout, organization of chapters and style, allocating 20 points. For presentation, it evaluates delivery, visual aids, knowledge, and preparation, allocating 20 points. The total possible grade is 100 points.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Project Title/Business Name: A Feasibility On Memorial Garden Group Members: Tiansing, Cesar Et Al

    Uploaded by

    Roel Jr Pinaroc Dolaypan
    970 views2 pages
    This document contains a rubric for grading a feasibility study on a proposed Memorial Garden project. The rubric assesses the quality of content, organization and presentation. For content, it evaluates the market assessment, technical assessment, organization and management assessment, and financial and socio-economic assessments. It allocates 60 points for content. For organization, it assesses mechanics, layout, organization of chapters and style, allocating 20 points. For presentation, it evaluates delivery, visual aids, knowledge, and preparation, allocating 20 points. The total possible grade is 100 points.

    Original Title

    RUBRICS-FOR-FEASIBILITY-STUDY-EVALUATION

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document contains a rubric for grading a feasibility study on a proposed Memorial Garden project. The rubric assesses the quality of content, organization and presentation. For content, it evaluates the market assessment, technical assessment, organization and management assessment, and financial and socio-economic assessments. It allocates 60 points for content. For organization, it assesses mechanics, layout, organization of chapters and style, allocating 20 points. For presentation, it evaluates delivery, visual aids, knowledge, and preparation, allocating 20 points. The total possible grade is 100 points.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    970 views2 pages

    Project Title/Business Name: A Feasibility On Memorial Garden Group Members: Tiansing, Cesar Et Al

    Uploaded by

    Roel Jr Pinaroc Dolaypan
    This document contains a rubric for grading a feasibility study on a proposed Memorial Garden project. The rubric assesses the quality of content, organization and presentation. For content, it evaluates the market assessment, technical assessment, organization and management assessment, and financial and socio-economic assessments. It allocates 60 points for content. For organization, it assesses mechanics, layout, organization of chapters and style, allocating 20 points. For presentation, it evaluates delivery, visual aids, knowledge, and preparation, allocating 20 points. The total possible grade is 100 points.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    SAINT MARY’S UNIVERSITY

    School of Accountancy and Business


    FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARATION
    RUBRICS FOR GRADING

    PROJECT TITLE/BUSINESS NAME: A FEASIBILITY ON MEMORIAL GARDEN


    GROUP MEMBERS:
    Tiansing , Cesar et al

    CRITERIA AND RATING:


    Aspect Details Weight Grade
    A. QUALITY OF CONTENT 60 points 52
    1. Market Identified the target market and its segmentation 2
    assessment Clearly established the basis for demand, supply, 4
    price and competition
    Presented projections for demand and supply and 3
    the evaluation of unsatisfied demand or excess
    supply
    Clearly explained the marketing program to take 2
    advantage of unsatisfied demand or to create
    demand when the result is an excess supply
    Clearly presented the marketing costs 2
    Established a sound conclusion as to its market 3
    feasibility
    2. Technical Specific technical requirements were identified and 5
    assessment explained
    (focus on process, technology used and
    equipment/machines)
    Basis for technical specifications were presented and 5
    explained
    Clearly presented the technical costs 2
    Established a sound conclusion as to its technical 3
    feasibility
    3. Organization & Specific organization and management requirements 4
    Management were identified and explained
    Assessment (focus on type of organization, legal requirements,
    pre-operating activities & labor requirements)
    Basis for organization and management 1
    requirements were presented and explained
    Clearly presented the organization and management 2
    costs
    Established a sound conclusion as to its 3
    management feasibility
    4. Financial Required financial assessments are made 4
    Assessment (focus on projected income statement, statement of
    business condition, cash flow, ROI)
    There is complete data on which to base a thorough 3
    analysis (note: with acceptable assumptions and
    must be consistent with the costs stated in Market,
    Technical and Organization Aspects)
    Analysis of financial performance is with valid and 5
    relevant supportive detail, correct calculations and
    appropriate interpretation
    Established a sound conclusion as to its financial 3
    viability
    1

    5. Socio economic Clearly established a sound socio-economic 5


    Page

    assessment contributions

    C. K. ACPAL
    Instructor
    SAINT MARY’S UNIVERSITY
    School of Accountancy and Business
    FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARATION
    RUBRICS FOR GRADING

    Aspect Details Weight Grade


    B. ORGANIZATION, FORM AND LAY-OUT 20 points 16
    6. Mechanics Proper grammar, correct spelling, punctuation, 3 rd 5
    person objective view, professional writing, and
    syntax
    7. Lay-out APA format is followed particularly on tables, figures, 2
    citation of sources or Appendices, presentation of
    references, paragraph lay-out
    There are page numbers 1
    8. Organization Required chapters are presented and substantiated 5
    (Market, Technical, Organization & Management,
    Financial and Socio-economic aspects))
    Chapters, sections and subsections of the report are 2
    marked with appropriate headings.
    Relevant photos, charts or figures are presented to 2
    further visualize the discussions
    9. Style Uniform writing style all throughout the report 1
    (meaning there is no indication that the report
    involved multiple authors)
    Uniform presentation of the report 1
    Report is easy to understand 1
    C. PRESENTATION 20% 16
    10. Delivery Presenter was able to present/discuss the report and 5
    articulate the key points in an organized, flowing,
    spontaneous and confident manner within 10
    minutes
    11. Visual aids Visual aids (digital, model, sample) are appropriate, 5
    well prepared and clear
    12. Knowledge/ Group is able to correctly answer questions 5
    Mastery confidently
    13. Evidence of No awkward pauses or confusion from the group/ 5
    preparation group member(s)
    GRADE 100% 84

    Elnora V. Adalem
    NAME AND SIGNATURE OF EVALUATOR

    DATE: _May 3, 2021


    2
    Page

    C. K. ACPAL
    Instructor

    You might also like