HBO (Chapter 5: Leadership and Its Changing Development in Organizations)
HBO (Chapter 5: Leadership and Its Changing Development in Organizations)
HBO (Chapter 5: Leadership and Its Changing Development in Organizations)
Introduction Management
Leadership Involves planning, organizing, staffing, directing, and
controlling
Ability of one to unite people to attain organization
Need to cope with changes brought by advances in
objectives collectively
science and technology
Keith Davis: ability to persuade others to seek defined
Several types of resistance to change have to be
objectives enthusiastically. Leadership brings about the
expected
realization of potentials that exist in organization and
Certain techniques have to be employed to build
its constituents
support for change
Plays an important role in management
Successful leadership depends on the actuations
rather than on the character traits of a person Manager
Variables that determine the nature of appropriate Has formal authority by virtue of his or her position or
leadership behaviour: office
o Leader May or may not be an effective leader
o Followers
o Situations
A manager is not necessarily a good leader just as a good
Should be distinguished from management as
leader may or may not be a good manager
leadership primarily deals with influence
Excellent manager is expected to have reasonably high
leadership ability
Leader
Number of roles to play
Task and Psychological Support
Has to exercise different styles of leadership that are
Leaders provide both task and psychological support
compatible to those he works with
for their followers
Must possess the ability to work effectively with others
Task: Help in assembling resources and other elements
and to bring teamwork
needed to get jobs and projects done
Wields certain organizational powers and employs
Psychological: Stimulate their followers to accomplish
strategies to gain support and allegiance among his
their respective jobs effectively and efficiently
followers
Exercise supervisory functions and to develop a
participative form of management Role Modeling
May or may not be a manager Supervisors – supervise as they themselves are subject
Key personnel or human resources in an organization to supervision
Appropriate for a leader: Leaders – serves as role models for their subordinates
o Stay at the background Type of Style:
o Don’t pressure the group 1. Autocratic Leadership
o Keep quiet so others may express themselves 2. Participative Leadership
o Keep calm at times of crisis 3. Free-reign Leadership
o Delay decision-making to carefully consider issues
and problems
Autocratic Leadership
Centralization of power and decision-making in the
Good leadership -> Good and better employees, products, leader
and services -> Benefits members of the society Leader has full authority and responsibility for what
transpires in his jurisdiction
Participative Management (under leadership) Basically negative in nature
Positive features: rewards to subordinates
Achieved through a number of participative programs
Benevolent autocrat – autocratic leader
Advantages of autocratic leadership: Leadership trait research examined the ff:/ Subjects of
1. Strong motivations and reward for the leader empirical research:
2. Results in quick decisions o Physical traits - height
3. Less competent employees can be employed to o Mental traits – intelligence
carry out orders o Social traits - personality
Disadvantages of autocratic leadership: Significant associations between individual traits and
1. Frustration, dissatisfaction, fear and conflict measures of leadership effectiveness
develop easily Initial conclusion: there were no universal traits that
2. Employees feel that they produce on account of consistently separated effective leaders from others
pressures rather than being spurred by Ralph Stogdill (1948): review of leadership literature,
motivations existing research had not demonstrated the utility of
3. Creativity of employee is stifled the trait approach
Problems of early trait research:
Participative Leadership o Measurement theory at the time was not highly
Decentralization of authority sophisticated
o Little was known about psychometric properties
Decisions are from followers and participation by them
Leader and the constituents of the group act as social of the measures
unit o Relied on samples of low-level managers
Encourages freedom of expression o Largely theoretical offering no explanations
Current trend: wider use of participative management o Did not consider the impact of situational
Supportive and collegial model of organizational variables that might moderate relationship
behaviour between leadership traits and measures of leader
Democratic: Consultative and Participative effectiveness
Generally avoids power and responsibility Beginning of the 1950s – disenchantment with the trait
The group establish their own goals and solve their approach
problems Focus of leadership: leader traits -> leader behaviours
Members take care of their own training and Premise: leadership behaviours > leadership traits
motivation 2 most famous behavioural leadership: (1940s to
Units tend to proceed at cross-purposes that bring 1950s)
chaos 1. Ohio State University
Work in reverse with autocratic form of leadership 2. University of Michigan
2. Task to be undertaken
3. Organization
Such variables may be referred to as:
1. Leader-member relations – manner in which the
leader is accepted by the group
2. Task structure – degree to which one specific
Production
way is required to do a piece of work
Impoverished Management – neither concern 3. Leader position power – organizational power of
“Country-club” Manager the leader
“Task” Manager
“Middle-of-the-road” Manager – balance Leaders as Followers
“Team Management” – high concern for both; best
leadership approach Leaders are also followers because they similarly
report to someone else on top of them
To be a good leader, one must be a good follower
Ability to follow is one of the requirements to qualify
Fiedler’s Theory: The Contingency Model of
for good leadership
Leadership
Leadership use of skills
Contingency or situational theories of leadership –
3 different types of skills are employed by leaders:
propose that the organizational or work group context
1. Technical skills – individual’s knowledge and
affects the extent to which given leader traits and
ability pertaining to certain processes or
behaviours will be effective
techniques; things
1960s to 1970s
2. Human skills – ability to work effectively with
4 of the well-known contingency theories:
others and to bring teamwork; major behavioural
1. Fiedler’s contingency theory
role played by leaders; people
2. Path-goal theory
3. Conceptual skills – ability to think in terms of
3. Vroom-Yetton-Jago decision-making model of
models, frameworks and broad relationships for
leadership
long-range planning; ideas
4. Situational leadership theory
Goal Setting
Concerned with the identification of targets, as well as The Blanchard (Situational) Model
long and short-term objectives, towards which
Situational leadership theory introduced in 1969 and
performance is directed
revised in 1977 by Hersey and Blanchard
At least 3 steps are required in goal setting:
The key contingency factor affecting leaders’ choice of
1. Definiton of goals
leadership style is the task-related maturity of the
2. Setting specific goals
subordinates
3. Obtaining feedback about goal accomplishments
One of the better-known contingency theories of
Goal Definition leadership despite it being criticized on theoretical and
Proper goal definition demands that the leader explains methodological grounds
the underlying intentions and their justification Subordinate maturity – ability of subordinates to
Specific Goals accept responsibility for their own
Classifications of leader behaviours (2 broad
Goals must be specific so that employees will have a
classes)
basis for assessing what they have achieved and feel a
o Task-oriented behaviours
sense of accomplishment
o Relationship-oriented behaviours
Feedback about accomplishments
Well-defined goals serve as yardsticks in measuring the
extent of nearness to established goals The Path-Goal Model of Leadership
Job feedback – generate better performance among Goal-setting has led to a path-goal view of leadership,
the team members or group an outcome from the expectancy model of motivation
Expectancy model states that valence (desire to achieve
The Vroom Model a goal) X expectancy (strength of the belief that specific
act will lead to desired goal) = motivation
Vroom-Yetton-Jago decision-making was introduced by Path-goal theory was first presented in 1971
Victor Vroom and Phillip Yetton (1973) and revised by Administrative Science Quarterly article by Robert
Vroom and Jago (1988) House
Focuses primarily on the degree of subordinate The subordinate’s characteristics and the
participation that is appropriate in different situations characteristics of the work environment determine
Emphasizes the decision-making style of leader which leader behaviours will be more effective
5 types of leader decision-making styles:
o AI – strongly autocratic Important environmental characteristics:
o AII o Nature of task
o CI o Formal authority system
o CII o Nature of work group
o G – strongly democratic
The appropriate style is determined by answers to up 4 different leader behaviours:
to eight diagnostic questions such as: o Directive leadership
o Importance of decision quality o Supportive leadership
o Structure of the problem o Participative leadership
o Whether subordinates have enough info to make a o Achievement-oriented leadership
quality decision
o Importance of subordinate commitment to the Leaders can establish the path-goal relationship
decision through the following ways:
Criticized for its: 1. Gibing better reward for goal attainment
o Complexity 2. Providing feedback about goal accomplishments
o Assumption that decision makers’ goals are 3. Improving or greasing the path toward the goal
consistent with organizational goals 4. Providing the needed resources and training and
o Ignoring the skills needed to arrive at group removing barriers along the way
decisions to difficult problems Related to goal-setting and the path-goal idea is what is
referred to as management by objectives
3. Resolution of conflicts from the implementation