Design Example - Composite Beam
Design Example - Composite Beam
Design Example - Composite Beam
This example deals with composite beams with metal decking composite floor of multi-
storey building; simply supported and spanning 6.0m. The metal deck floor is designed
for unpropped construction; the typical cross section is shown in Figure 1.
Partial factors
• γ = 1.35 (permanent loads)
G
•γ = 1.0
M0
•γ = 1.0
M1
• γ = 1.25
V
• γ = 1.5
C
Basic data
Design a composite floor beam of a multi-storey building according to the data given
below. The beam is assumed to be unpropped during construction.
The profiled steel sheeting is transverse to the beam
Try 254x146x37 UB
Depth h = 256.0 mm
a
Width b = 146.4 mm
Web thickness t = 6.3 mm
w
Fillet r = 7.6 mm
Mass 37.0 kg/m
2
Section area A = 47.2 cm
a
4
Second moment of area /yy I = 5537 cm
y
3
Elastic modulus /yy W = 432.6 cm
el,y
3
Plastic modulus /yy W = 483.2 cm
pl.y
2
Modulus of elasticity of steel E = 210000 N/mm
a
Connectors
Diameter d = 19 mm
Overall nominal height hsc= 100 mm
2
Ultimate tensile strength f = 450 N/mm
u
80
40
30
300
Actions:
Permanent action:
gk = 3.1 (slabs) + 1.2 (finishes) + 0.36 = 4.66 kN/m2
gd = 4.66 × 1.35 = 6.29 kN/m2
Variable action:
qk = 5.0 (imposed) + 0.5 (partition) = 5.5 kN/m2
qd = 5.5 × 1.5 = 8.25 kN/m2
Bending moment:
Vertical shear:
Yield strength
Steel grade S355
Sheet 4 of 7
Title Work Example: Composite beam design
2
The maximum thickness is 10.9 mm < 40 mm, so : f = 355 N/mm
y
Section classification :
235
The parameter ε is derived from the yield strength : ε = = 0.81
355
Outstand flange : flange under uniform compression
c = (b – t – 2 r) / 2 = (146.4 – 6.3 – 2 × 7.6)/2 = 62.45 mm EN1993
w
-1-1
c/t = 62.45 / 10.9 = 5.73 ≤ 9 ε = 7.29 Class 1
f
The class of the cross-section is the highest class (i.e the least favourable) between the
flange and the web, here : Class 1
So the ULS verifications should be based on the plastic resistance of the cross-section
since the Class is 1.
bo is the distance between the centres of the outstand shear connectors, here b = 100mm
0
b is the value of the effective width of the concrete flange on each side of the web and
ei
taken as b = L / 8 but ≤ b = 1.4 m
ei e i
Reduction factor (k )
t
For sheeting with ribs transverse to the supporting beam, the reduction factor for shear
resistance is calculated by :
Where :
n =2 h = 70 mm
r p
b = 162 mm h = 100 mm
0 sc
PRd = 36.4 kN
Where :
N is the design value of the shear connectors force
c
N is the design value of the compressive normal force in the concrete flange with full
c,f
shear connection or tensile force in steel with full connection
At mid-span :
The compressive normal force in the concrete flange represents the total connection.
A is the cross-sectional area of concrete, so at mid-span A = b h
c c eff c
2
with h = h - h = 150 – 70 = 80 mm, A = 1600 × 80 = 128000 mm
c p c
Sheet 6 of 7
Title Work Example: Composite beam design
f ck 25
N c. f = 0.85 Ac = 0.85 × 128000 × × 10− 3 = 1813kN
γc 1.5
The design value of the normal force in the structural steel section is given by :
-3
N =A f /γ = 4720 × 355 × 10 / 1.0 = 1675 kN
pl,a a y M0
The resistance of the shear connectors limits the normal force to not more than :
N = 0.5 n P = 0.5 × 40× 36.4 = 728 kN
c Rd
Nc 728
η= = = 0.44
Nc ,f 1675
⎛ 355 ⎞
ηmin = 1 − ⎜ ⎟(0.75 − 0.03 × 6.0 ) = 0.43 ≤ η ∴ok
⎝ 355 ⎠
-3
N =A f /γ = 4720 × 355 × 10 / 1.0 = 1675 kN
pl,a a y M0
f ck 25
N c. f = 0.85 Ac × 10− 3 = 1813kN
= 0.85 × 128000 ×
γc 1.5
Therefore, plastic natural axis in concrete slabs, xc < hc
Mpl,Rd = Npl,a (ha/2 +h - xc/2) = 1675 × (256/2 +150 – 74/2) = 403 kNm
The resistance of the shear connectors limits the normal force to not more than :
N = 0.5 n P = 0.5 × 40× 36.4 = 728 kN
c Rd
Nc 728
Therefore, η = = = 0.44
N c , f 1675
M Ed 183.2
Therefore, = = 0.67 < 1.0 OK
M Rd 273