Accounting For Bonds Payable
Accounting For Bonds Payable
Accounting For Bonds Payable
A bond payable is just a promise to pay a series of payments over time (the interest component) and a
fixed amount at maturity (the face amount). Thus, it is a blend of an annuity (the interest) and lump sum
payment (the face). To determine the amount an investor will pay for a bond, therefore, requires present
value computations to determine the current worth of the future payments. Assume that Schultz Company
issues 5-year, 8% bonds. Bonds frequently have a $1,000 face value and pay interest every six months.
Using these assumptions, consider the following three alternative scenarios:
The following table shows calculations of the price of the bond under different scenarios:
To further explain, the interest amount on the $1,000, 8% bond is $40 every six months. Because the
bonds have a 5-year life, there are 10 interest payments (or periods). The periodic interest is an annuity
with a 10-period duration, while the maturity value is a lump-sum payment at the end of the tenth period.
The 8% market rate of interest equates to a semiannual rate of 4%, the 6% market rate scenario equates
to a 3% semiannual rate, and the 10% rate is 5% per semiannual period.
The present value factors are taken from the present value tables (annuity and lump-sum, respectively).
Take time to verify the factors by reference to the appropriate tables, spreadsheet, or calculator routine.
The present value factors are multiplied by the payment amounts, and the sum of the present value of the
components would equal the price of the bond under each of the three scenarios.
Note that the 8% market rate assumption produced a bond priced at $1,000, the 6% assumption
produced a bond priced at $1,085.30 (which includes an $85.30 premium), and the 10% assumption
produced a bond priced at $922.78 (which includes a $77.22 discount).
These calculations are not only correct theoretically, but are very accurate financial tools. However, one
point is noteworthy. Bond pricing is frequently to the nearest 1/32nd. That is, a bond might trade at
103.08. One could easily misinterpret this price as $1,030.80. But, it actually means 103 and 8/32. In
dollars, this would amount to $1,032.50 ($1,000 X 103.25). Having learned the financial mechanics of
bonds, it is now time to examine the correct accounting.
The income statement for all of 20X3 would include $6,294 of interest expense ($3,147 X 2). This method
of accounting for bonds is known as the straight-line amortization method, as interest expense is
recognized uniformly over the life of the bond. Although simple, it does have one conceptual shortcoming.
Notice that interest expense is the same each year, even though the net book value of the bond (bond
plus remaining premium) is declining each year due to amortization.
As a result, interest expense each year is not exactly equal to the effective rate of interest (6%) that was
implicit in the pricing of the bonds. For 20X1, interest expense can be seen to be roughly 5.8% of the
bond liability ($6,294 expense divided by beginning of year liability of $108,530). For 20X4, interest
expense is roughly 6.1% ($6,294 expense divided by beginning of year liability of $103,412).
Accountants have devised a more precise approach to account for bond issues called the effective-
interest method. Be aware that the more theoretically correct effective-interest method is actually the
required method, except in those cases where the straight-line results do not differ materially. Effective-
interest techniques are introduced in a following section of this chapter.
The following entries reflect periodi
Each yearly income statement would include $9,544.40 of interest expense ($4,772.20 X 2). The straight-
line approach suffers from the same limitations discussed earlier, and is acceptable only if the results are
not materially different from those resulting with the effective-interest technique.