Assignment 2
Assignment 2
Assignment 2
Individual/Group Individual
Weighting 20%
Context
As you now know, a key to self-directed learning is reflection. Reflection enables the ability to
examine situations in order to better understand the surrounding context and identify potential
improvements for the future. This assessment task builds on assessment 1 and aims to develop your
awareness and reflective learning ability while also assessing your understanding of your Gallup
Strengths identified in module 3. As with assessment 1, your journal entry must be written in the
first person and you should try to be as open and honest with yourself as you can.
Please also visit the Academic Skills blackboard page for an overview of reflective writing in higher
education: https://laureate-
au.blackboard.com/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_20163_1&content_id
=_2498857_1&mode=reset
Instructions
This assessment task requires you to do the following:
Guiding questions
1. What did you learn about yourself from your Clifton Strengths Survey and your group
coaching session with your Success Coach?
2. Were you surprised by any of your Top 5 talents (signature themes)? Why?
3. When you read your Top 5 talents, was there one or more you immediately resonated with?
Which one/s? Why?
4. How will this improved understanding of your talents/strengths apply to your professional
development?
5. What do you think the greatest challenges for you will be in reaching your career goals?; and
what Talent from your Top 5 could you draw on to assist you?
Submission Instructions
Submit your Reflective Journal 2: Gallup Strengths via the Assessment link in the main navigation
menu in BIZ102 Understanding People and Organisations. The learning facilitator will provide
feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.
The Learning Rubric below is your guide to how your assessment task will be marked. Please be sure
to check this rubric very carefully before submission.
Professional Journal entry shows no or Journal entry shows Journal entry shows Journal entry shows Journal entry shows
development limited evidence of reflective some evidence of evidence of adequate evidence of thorough evidence of thorough and
reflection thinking in regards to how reflective thinking and reflective thinking and reflective thinking and critical reflective thinking
strengths could be used for generically articulates generically articulates clearly articulates how and clearly articulates how
20% student’s professional how strengths could how strengths could be strengths could be used own strengths could be
development. be used for student’s leveraged for student’s for student’s professional utilised for future
professional professional development. Entry professional development.
development. development. Entry demonstrates sufficient Entry demonstrates a
includes some reflection on the adverse critical reflection on the
comments on adverse effect strengths may adverse effect strengths
effects the strengths have when not applied may have when not
may have when not correctly. applied correctly.
applied correctly.
Challenges reflection Journal entry does not Journal entry shows a Journal entry shows an Journal entry Journal entry
identify challenges to achieve basic identification of adequate identification demonstrates a thorough demonstrates a critical
20% career goals. Entry shows challenges to achieve of challenges to achieve identification of and thorough
no/limited attempt to reflect career goals and a career goals and a challenges to achieve identification of challenges