See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/224091937

Harmonic analysis of input current of single- phase controlled bridge rectifier

Conference Paper · November 2009

DOI: 10.1109/ISIEA.2009.5356404 · Source: IEEE Xplore

CITATIONS READS

5 3,239

4 authors, including:

Taufik Taufik Andre Diwa Aji Pratama

California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Universitas Dian Nuswantoro Semarang
191 PUBLICATIONS   831 CITATIONS    6 PUBLICATIONS   12 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Makbul Anwari
King Abdulaziz University
132 PUBLICATIONS   1,888 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Economic Evaluation and Determination of Optimal Hybrid Energy Supply Systems for Residential and Healthcare Facilities in Rural and Urban Areas View project

MPPT Method for Partially Shaded PV System View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Taufik Taufik on 09 February 2019.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 2009 IEEE Symposium on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ISIEA 2009), October 4-6, 2009, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Harmonic Analysis of Input Current of Single-

Phase Controlled Bridge Rectifier

Michael McCarty
Taufik Taufik
Andre Pratama
Makbul Anwari

Electrical Engr. Dept.

Electrical Engr. Dept.
Electrical Engr. Dept.
Faculty of Electrical Engr.

Cal Poly State University

Cal Poly State University
Cal Poly State University
Univ. Teknologi Malaysia

San Luis Obispo, USA

San Luis Obispo, USA
San Luis Obispo, USA
81310 UTM, Malaysia

Abstract—Harmonic analysis of input current of single despite their increased cost of approximately twice as
phase uncontrolled rectifier is widely known. However, little much as and weight 115% more than the standard
has been known about harmonic of the input current of transformer, the k-rated transformers would sometimes be
single phase controlled or thyristor rectifier. This paper necessary [3]. Additionally, these higher frequencies of
presents such an analysis using the bridge configuration for harmonics can increase the eddy currents and hysteresis
the controlled rectifier circuit. Results obtained from
losses and heat up the transformer. Lastly, these effects
mathematical derivation, computer simulation, and
hardware measurements will also be discussed. can add up and cause larger issues to the entire power
system [4][5].
Keywords—Harmonics; Rectifier; Power Quality While the analysis of input current harmonics of
uncontrolled or diode rectifier has been widely conducted
I. INTRODUCTION and published as in [6][7][8][9], little has been known on
While the use of uncontrolled rectifier circuits remains the analysis of input current harmonics of single phase
prominent, for some applications, more control and controlled rectifier. Also, many power electronic
textbooks have a rather detailed study of the harmonics at
efficiency is necessary. This can be accomplished
the output of controlled rectifiers, but a similar study of
through the use of a controlled rectifier circuit in which
the input current is lacking, especially from the empirical
thyristors connected in a full-bridge configuration adjust
the average voltage. Each thyristor has a gate that aspect of the issue. This paper hence presents the results
controls when it turns on. With control circuitry these of study on the effects of the input current harmonics to
devices can be operated with a controllable firing angle controlled rectifier circuit using theoretical, simulation,
and experimental methods.
(α) that can vary the average and rms of output voltage.
The study starts with the mathematical analysis of
Devices that use this technology include Uninterruptable
Power Supplies (UPS), low-power DC motor drives [1], the harmonic distortion at the input current of controlled
as well as cycloconverter [2]. rectifier circuit. OrCAD PSpice simulation is then used to
The ability to control the output voltage through the verify the total harmonic distortion (THD) as predicted
use of thyristors does not come without a cost. As the from the mathematical analysis. To further verify the
THD level of the input current, a laboratory setup is being
firing angle (α) increases, the non-linearity of the rectifier
used and tested to obtain actual hardware measurements.
circuit does as well. This means that the shapes of the
output voltage and input current waveforms become less II. FOURIER ANALYSIS INPUT CURRENT HARMONICS
sinusoidal. Consequently, this increases the harmonic
This investigation into the harmonic distortion begins
content of the device both at the input and at the output.
with a Fourier analysis of the fundamental component of
At the input of the rectifier, the voltage supplied by the the input current. Figure 1 shows a simplified schematic
grid is relatively stable and the physics of the device of the controlled rectifier circuit. In it four thyristors are
allow the input voltage to remain sinusoidal with minimal connected in a full bridge configuration with an AC input
harmonic distortion. On the contrary, the input current’s and a resistive load output. The firing angle (α) of the
behavior depends on how long the thyristors conduct thyristors can be controlled through their gates to chop the
inside the rectifier circuit. The less the conduction time of input current on the positive and negative cycles.
the thrystors, the more harmonics will be drawn from the
source which may affect neighboring loads and power
system equipment up the stream. The adverse effects of
the harmonic distortion in the input current come in many
forms. One detrimental effect is that input current L
O
A
harmonic distortion can lead to voltage distortion further D

up the line due to the line impedance. This harmonics

may reach the distribution transformers which are not
rated to handle large amounts of harmonics. Therefore,
Figure 1. A simplified schematic of the Thyristor controlled circuit

978-1-4244-4683-4/09/$25.00 ©2009 IEEE 520

 2009 IEEE Symposium on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ISIEA 2009), October 4-6, 2009, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Since both a1 and b1 are magnitudes and at the same

frequency they must be changes to rms values and their
geometric mean must be calculated.

ܽଵଶ ൅ ܾଵଶ
݂ଵሺ௥௠௦ሻ ൌ ඨ
2

Figure 2.Input current waveform used for Fourier Analysis The total rms value is calculated from:

Using Figure 2, which shows the input current ߙ sinሺ2ߙሻ 1

waveform, the Fourier series component can be expressed ݂௧௢௧ሺ௥௠௦ሻ ൌ ඨ1 െ ൅
as: ߨ 2π √2
ଵ ଶగ
ܽ௡ ൌ ‫׬‬଴ ݂ ሺ߱‫ݐ‬ሻ cosሺ݊߱‫ݐ‬ሻ ݀ ሺ߱‫ݐ‬ሻ(1)
గ while the THD can be shown as
1 ଶగ
ܾ௡ ൌ න ݂ ሺ߱‫ݐ‬ሻ sinሺ݊߱‫ݐ‬ሻ ݀ ሺ߱‫ݐ‬ሻ ට௙೟೚೟ሺೝ೘ೞሻ మ ି௙భሺೝ೘ೞሻ మ
ߨ ଴ ܶ‫ ܦܪ‬ൌ
௙భሺೝ೘ೞሻ

Since in determining the THD this analysis is only

A summary of the theoretical THD at different firing
concerned with the fundamental component (n = 1), the
angles (α) is shown in Table 1 of Section IV.
above equations must only be used for n equal to one.
The derivation of a1 and b1 is summarized below.
గ
III. COMPUTER SIMULATION
ߨܽଵ ൌ න ‫݊݅ݏ‬ሺ߱‫ݐ‬ሻ cosሺ߱‫ݐ‬ሻ ݀ሺ߱‫ݐ‬ሻ Following the Fourier series analysis is a computer
ఈ simulation using OrCAD PSpice. Figure 3 depicts the
ଶగ
schematic used in simulating the controlled rectifier
൅න ‫݊݅ݏ‬ሺ߱‫ݐ‬ሻ cosሺ߱‫ݐ‬ሻ ݀ ሺ߱‫ݐ‬ሻ circuit. The schematic models the actual full bridge
గାఈ
rectifier circuit as will be built in the lab used for
hardware measurements. However, rather than using the
‫݊݅ݏ‬ଶ ሺ߱‫ ݐ‬ሻ గ ‫݊݅ݏ‬ଶ ሺ߱‫ݐ‬ሻ ଶగ
ൌ |ఈ ൅ |గାఈ actual thyristors with their firing controller circuit, the
2 2 model uses diodes in conjunction with the switch Sbreak
to model the thyristors and controller. While this model
2ߨܽଵ ൌ െ2‫݊݅ݏ‬ଶ ሺߙሻ does not use thyrisors, the use of the diodes in conjunction
with the switch Sbreak will produce identical results at the
૚ input and output to what would be obtained otherwise.
ࢇ૚ ൌ െ ࢙࢏࢔૛ ሺࢻሻ Figure 4 illustrates the input current and output voltage
࣊
waveforms when the firing angle is set at 45o. As expected
both waveforms are distorted due to the delay of the
గ conduction of the current into the load.
ߨܾଵ ൌ න ‫݊݅ݏ‬ሺ߱‫ݐ‬ሻ sinሺ߱‫ݐ‬ሻ ݀ ሺ߱‫ݐ‬ሻ
ఈ
ଶగ PARAMETERS:
൅න ‫݊݅ݏ‬ሺ߱‫ݐ‬ሻ sinሺ߱‫ݐ‬ሻ ݀ሺ߱‫ݐ‬ሻ FREQ = 60

గାఈ ALPHA = 15

గ
D1 D3 S1
-
+

2ߨܾଵ ൌ න ሺ1 െ cosሺ2߱‫ݐ‬ሻሻ ݀ ሺ߱‫ݐ‬ሻ Dbreak Dbreak

+
-

ఈ V1 Sbreak
ଶగ VOFF = 0
൅න ሺ1 െ cosሺ2߱‫ݐ‬ሻሻ ݀ሺ߱‫ݐ‬ሻ VAMPL = 169.7
FREQ = {FREQ} V2 R1
గାఈ

sin ሺ2߱‫ݐ‬ሻ గ sin ሺ2߱‫ݐ‬ሻ ଶగ D4 D2

ൌ‫ݐ‬െ |ఈ ൅ ‫ ݐ‬െ |గାఈ Dbreak Dbreak
2 2 0
V1 = 0
sin ሺ2ߨሻ sin ሺ2ߙሻ V2 = 1
ൌߨെߙെ ൅ ൅ 2ߨ െ ߨ െ ߙ TR = 10n

2 2 TF = 10n

sin ሺ4ߨሻ sin ሺ2ߨ ൅ 2ߙ ሻ PER = {1/(2*FREQ)}

െ ൅ TD = {(ALPHA/360)*(1/FREQ)}

2 2 PW = {(1/(2*FREQ))-(ALPHA/360)*(1/FREQ)}

ࢻ ‫ ܖܑܛ‬ሺ૛ࢻሻ Figure 3. OrCAD PSpice schematic of controlled rectifier circuit

࢈૚ ൌ ૚ െ ൅
࣊ ૛ૈ

521
 2009 IEEE Symposium on Industrial Eleectronics and Applications (ISIEA 2009), October 4-6, 20099, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

200mA

100mA

0A

-100mA

-200mA
0s 5ms 10ms 15ms 20ms 25ms 30ms 35ms 40ms 45ms 50ms
-I(V1)
Time

200V

150V

100V

50V

0V
0s 2ms 4ms 6ms 8ms 10ms 12ms 14ms 16ms 18ms 20ms 22ms 24ms
V(R1:2)
Time Figure 7. Enerpro’s Thyyristor Firing board

Figure 4. Input current (top) and output voltage (bbottom) waveforms at

45o firing angle Figure 8 shows thee captured input current
waveform from the PowerSightt Manager software. It can
be seen that this waveformm resembles the chopped
The harmonic content of each waveform is obtained
through the FFT feature of OrCAD Psppice as depicted in waveform of Figure 2. Table 1 shows a summary of the
Figure 5 for the input current, again when 45o firing angle magnitudes of the harmonic components as well as the
is applied. THD of the input current.

160mA

120mA

80mA

40mA

0A
0Hz 0.1KHz 0.2KHz 0.3KHz 0.4KHz 0.5KHz 0.6KHz 0.7KHz 0.8KHz 0.9KHz 1.0KHz
I(V1)
Frequency

Figure 5. Frequency spectrum of input currentt at 45o firing angle

A Fourier series analysis of the inpput current at the

fundamental 60 Hz frequency was peerformed up to 50
harmonics. The THD results of this simuulation can also be
seen in Table 1 in Section V.
orm for a 45° Firing Angle
Figure 8. Input Current Wavefo

IV. HARDWARE MEASUR

REMENT
The circuit of Figure 1 was configurred using a power Table 1. Summary of Total Har

rmonic Distortion Analysis

thyristor module and Enerpro’s firing board as illustrated
in Figures 6 and 7. A potentiometer was used to control Input Current THD (%)
the firing angle on the Enerpro’s firring board and a Firing Fourier
PowerSight 3000 power meter was useed to measure the Angle Analysis Simulated Experimental
input current and its harmonics. The PowerSight Manager 5.14 1.21 1.54 8.24
software was used to collect the input current waveform 10 3.21 3.34 9.81
and calculate the THD.
15 5.75 5.52 11.24
30 15.11 14.76 15.59
45 25.93 25.6 25.27
60 37.74 37.59 34.03
75 50.63 50.6 49.03
90 65.05 65.18 62.93
105 81.86 82.18 64.74
120 102.63 103.24 116.89
135 130.58 131.73 143.1
Figure 6. Power thyristor moddule
150 173.92 168.27 179.05

522

 2009 IEEE Symposium on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ISIEA 2009), October 4-6, 2009, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Figure 10 shows the input current waveform for the

smallest firing angle of 5.14°. The waveform shows that
even though only a small firing angle exists there are
large current spikes when the thyristors are turned on.
These current spikes affect the THD and cause it to have
a different value than expected mathematically and
through simulation. This is the same case at larger firing
angles above 90°. There the fundamental component has
an even smaller value causing the THD to be more
sensitive to these spikes.
Figure 11 shows a graph of the THD from the three
different forms of analysis. It shows that all three follow
each other relatively closely and thus verify the validity
of the mathematical analysis, as well as the model used in
the computer simulation.

Figure 9. Input Current Harmonics for a 45° Firing Angle

Figure 9 shows that for a 45° firing angle the THD is

25.27%. This analysis was repeated in 15° intervals from
5° to 150°. The firing angle was limited by the operation
of the firing board. The results of the experiment can be
seen in Table 1.
V. DISCUSSION
Table 1 shows a summary of the results from
mathematical analysis, computer simulation, and
hardware measurement. First, the table shows that, with Figure 11. THD as a Function of Firing Angle
the exception of 150°, the Fourier series analysis and
simulated results never differ by greater than 1.2 %THD. VI. CONCLUSION
Secondly, we can observe that the experimental results
closely relate with the simulated results from 30° to 90°. In this paper the total harmonic distortion (THD) of a
Outside of this range there is a larger deviation in which controlled rectifier was investigated. The investigation
the experimental results show greater THD value. This is began with a mathematical derivation of the fundamental
mainly caused by the amount of spikes on the current component of the Fourier series of the input current
waveform that worsens as firing angle exceeds 90° or waveform. This result was used to determine the rms
when the firing angle is small, see Figure 10. value of the fundamental component of the input current
and the corresponding THD. This was followed by a
computer simulation using OrCAD PSpice. A Fourier
series analysis was performed in the simulation. Lastly, a
hardware experiment was conducted and a PowerSight
3000 power meter and PowerSight manager computer
software was used to determine the THD.
The three different analyses showed that as
firing increased so did harmonic distortion. This is an
important quality to note. If a large device or a large
number of small devices pulled current at a frequency
other than the fundamental component devices could be
harmed. It is important to note that k-rated transformers
and harmonic filters may be necessary to protect the
overall system from such damaging frequencies. This
paper effectively demonstrates the impact of harmonic
distortion at the input of such devices, and provides the
necessary theoretical equations for predicting the THD of
Figure 10. Input Current Waveform for a 5.14° Firing Angle input current of a single-phase controlled rectifier.

523

 2009 IEEE Symposium on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ISIEA 2009), October 4-6, 2009, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We wish to acknowledge Enerpro, Inc. of Goleta,
California for their generous donation of their thyristor
firing boards to the Power Electronics lab at Cal Poly
State University in San Luis Obispo, California.

REFERENCES
[1] Rashid, M., Power Electronics: Circuits, Devices, and
Applications, 3rd Edition, New Jersey: Prentice Hall 2004.
[2] Dubey, G. K., Doradia S. R., Joshi, A., Thyristorised Power
Controllers, 2nd Edition, New Age International, 1986.
[3] Kennedy, B. W., Energy Efficient Transformers, McGraw-Hill
Professional, 1997.
[4] Barnes, R., “Harmonics in power systems”, Power Engineering
Journal, Volume 3, Issue 1, pp 11 – 15, January 1989.
[5] Maslowski, W. A., “Harmonics in power systems”, Proc. IEEE
1992 Annual Textile, Fiber and Film Industry Technical
Conference, pp. 11/1 – 1110, 1993.
[6] Stratford, P. R., “Rectifier harmonics in power systems”, IEEE
Trans. On Industry Applications, Volume IA-16, Issue 2, pp. 271
– 276, March 1980.
[7] Szabados, B., “On the interaction between power system
configuration and industrial rectifier harmonic interference: a
practical case study”, IEEE Trans. on Power Apparatus and
Systems, Volume PAS-101, Issue 8, pp. 2762 – 2769, August
1982.
[8] Tzeng, Y. S., “Harmonic analysis of parallel-connected 12-pulse
uncontrolled rectifier without an interphase transformer”, Electric
Power Applications, IEE Proceedings, Volume 145, Issue 3, pp.
253 – 260, May 1998.
[9] Fukuda, S., Ohta, M., and Iwaji, Y., “An auxiliary-supply-assisted
harmonic reduction scheme for 12-Pulse diode rectifiers”, IEEE
Trans. On Power Electronics, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp. 1270 –
1277, May 2008.

524

View publication stats