MSL 712: Ethics & Values Based Leadership

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 16

MSL 712: Ethics & Values

Based Leadership
Introduction
Ethics and Morality
• Ethics is the study of morality.
– Morality =The standards that an individual or a group has
about what is right and wrong, or good and evil.
• Example: B.F.Goodrich A7-D Fraud
– Moral Standards = norms about the kinds of actions that
are morally right and wrong, as well as the values placed
on what is morally good or bad.
– Non-Moral Standards: The standards by which we judge
what is good or bad and right or wrong in a non-moral way.
Five Characteristics of Moral Standards

• Involve significant injuries or benefits


• Not established by authority figures
(Different from the Law or legal System)
• Should be preferred to other valuesincluding
self-interest
• Based on impartial considerations
• Associated with special emotions and
vocabulary.
What is Business Ethics?
• Broadly, ethics is the discipline that examines
one’s moral standards or the moralstandards
of a society to evaluate their reasonableness
and their implications for one’slife.
• Business ethics is a specialized study of moral
right and wrong that concentrates on moral
standards as they apply to business
institutions, organizations, and behavior.
Arguments Against Business Ethics
• In a free market economy, the pursuit of profit
will ensure maximum social benefit so
business ethics is not needed.
• A manager’s most important obligation is
loyalty to the company regardless ofethics.
• So long as companies obey the law they will
do all that ethicsrequires.
Arguments Supporting Business Ethics

• Ethics applies to all human activities.


• Business cannot survive without ethics.
• Ethics is consistent with profit seeking.
• Customers, employees, and people in general
care about ethics.
• Studies suggest ethics does not detract from
profits and seems to contribute to profits.
Resolving Cross-Cultural Ethical
Differences
• Moral Relativism = the theory that there are no
ethical standards that are absolutely true and
that apply or should be applied to the companies
and people of all societies.
• Objections to Moral Relativism:
– Some moral standards are found in all societies;
– Moral differences do notlogically imply relativism;
– Relativism has incoherent consequences;
– Relativism privileges whatever moral standardsare
widely accepted in asociety.
Resolving Cross-Cultural Ethical
Differences
• According to the Integrative SocialContracts
Theory (ISCT), there are two kinds of moral
standards:
– Hypernorms: those moral standards that should
be applied to people in allsocieties.
– Microsocial norms: those norms that differ from
one community to another and that should be
applied to people only if their community accepts
those particular norms.
Moral Reasoning
• The reasoning process by which human
behaviors, institutions, or policies arejudged
to be in accordance with or in violation of
moral standards.
• Moral reasoning involves:
– The moral standards by which we evaluate things
– Information about what is being evaluated
– A moral judgment about what is being evaluated.
Four Steps Leading to Ethical Behavior

• Step One: Recognizing a situation is an ethical


situation.
– Requires framing it as one that requiresethical
reasoning
– Situation is likely to be seen as ethical when:
• involves serious harm that is concentrated, likely, proximate,
imminent, and potentially violates our moral standards
– Obstacles to recognizing asituation:
• Euphemistic labeling, justifying our actions, advantageous
comparisons, displacement of responsibility, diffusion of
responsibility, distorting the harm, and dehumanization,and
attribution of blame.
Four Steps Leading to Ethical Behavior

• Step Two: Judging the ethical course of action.


– Requires moral reasoning that applies our moral
standards to the information we have about a
situation.
– Requires realizing that information about a
situation may be distorted by biased theories
about the world, about others, and aboutoneself.
Four Steps Leading to Ethical Behavior

• Step Three: Deciding to do the ethicalcourse


of action.
– Deciding to do what is ethical can beinfluenced
by:
• The culture of an organization—people’s decisionsto
do what is ethical are greatly influenced by their
surroundings.
• Moral seduction—organizations can also generate a
form of “moral seduction” that can exert subtle
pressures that can gradually lead an ethical personinto
decisions to do what he orshe knows is wrong.
Four Steps Leading to Ethical Behavior

• Step Four: Carrying out the ethical decision.

– Factors that influence whether a person carries


out their ethical decisioninclude:

• One’s strength or weakness of will

• One’s belief about the locus of control of one’s actions


Moral Responsibility
• Three Components of Moral Responsibility
– Person caused or helped cause the injury, or
failed to prevent it when he or she could and
should have (causality).
– Person did so knowing what he or she was doing
(knowledge).
– Person did so of his or her own freewill
(freedom).
Overall perspective
 Business Organizations—Actors
 Their Actions Towards Different Stakeholders
 Stakeholders have inducements &
contributions

 Business Organizations interactions with


A. Society at Large (CSR)
B. Business Ideologies—Markets Based Economic Systems,
Shareholders
 C. Immediate Community and environment
 D. Customers
 E. Employees

You might also like