2011 01 18 LTR To AGHolder On Crack Sentencing
2011 01 18 LTR To AGHolder On Crack Sentencing
2011 01 18 LTR To AGHolder On Crack Sentencing
Interim Chairperson
January 18, 2011
Judith L. Lichtman
National Partnership for Women
& Families
Vice Chairperson
The Honorable Eric Holder
Karen K. Narasaki
Asian American Justice Center
Attorney General
Secretary
Barry Rand
Department of Justice
AARP 950 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Treasurer
Lee A. Saunders Washington, DC 20530
American Federation of State,
County & Municipal Employees
Executive Committee
Barbara Arnwine
Lawyer’s Committee For Dear Attorney General Holder:
Civil Rights Under Law
Arlene Holt Baker
AFL-CIO
Marcia Greenberger
National Women’s Law Center
On behalf of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, a diverse coalition of
Linda D. Hallman more than 200 national organizations charged with promoting and protecting the rights of all
American Association of
University Women persons in the United States, we urge you to issue guidance instructing all federal prosecutors
Mary Kay Henry
Service Employees to apply the modified mandatory minimums in the new Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 to all
International Union
Andrew J. Imparato defendants who have not yet been sentenced, including those whose conduct predates the
American Association of People
with Disabilities legislation‟s enactment.
Benjamin Jealous
NAACP
Michael B. Keegan
People For The American Way The passage of the FSA was a watershed moment in the move toward fairness in criminal
Floyd Mori
Japanese American Citizens sentencing and in the effort to correct a long standing wrong. Your leadership and support
League
Marc H. Morial for the FSA were not only crucial to its passage, but also conveyed the need for immediate
National Urban League
Janet Murguia action. As you noted last year when testifying before the Senate, “the stakes are simply too
National Council of La Raza
Debra Ness high to let reform in this area wait any longer.”1 We agree.
National Partnership for Women
And Families
Terry O’Neill
National Organization for Women When Congress passed the FSA, it did so with the intention of restoring fairness to federal
Jacqueline Johnson Pata
National Congress of cocaine sentencing. To that end, Congress granted the U.S. Sentencing Commission
American Indians
John Payton emergency authority in the new law to “promulgate the guidelines, policy statements, or
NAACP Legal Defense and
Educational Fund, Inc. amendments provided for in this Act as soon as practicable”2 precisely because there was
Dennis Van Roekel
National Education Association widespread agreement that the old regime constituted an intolerable injustice that needed to
Anthony Romero
American Civil Liberties Union be remedied immediately. On October 21, 2010, the Commission acted on that emergency
Thomas A. Saenz
Mexican American Legal Defense power by issuing a temporary amendment to account for the changes in the penalty structure
& Educational Fund
David Saperstein that went into effect on November 1, 2010.
Religious Action Center for
Reform Judaism
Shanna L. Smith
National Fair Housing Alliance All of this would lead us to think that the Justice Department would work with some urgency
Joe Solmonese
Human Rights Campaign to prosecute crack offenders along the new guidelines consistent with the remedial purpose of
Randi Weingarten
American Federation of Teachers
the Act. But to our dismay, Assistant U.S. Attorney Michael J. Conley recently argued in
Mary G. Wilson
League of Women Voters
court that it was the Justice Department‟s policy, and not simply a matter of prosecutorial
Sara Najjar-WIlson discretion, to apply the old mandatory minimums to all future prosecutions and sentencing
American-Arab Anti-
Discrimination Committee based on pre-August 3, 2010, conduct.3
Compliance/Enforcement
Committee Chairperson
Karen K. Narasaki
Asian American Justice Center
President & CEO
Wade J. Henderson
Executive Vice President & COO
Karen McGill Lawson 1
Holder, Eric. Statement to the United States Senate, Committee on the Judiciary. Oversight of the
Department of Justice, Hearing, November 18, 2009.
2
“Fair Sentencing Act of 2010” (PL 111-220, August 3, 2010)
3
U.S. v. Douglas, _F. Supp.2d _, 2010 WL 4260221 (D. Maine, October 27, 2010) (Hornby J.) at 2,9
and FN 29.
January 18, 2011
Page 2 of 2
Judge D. Brock Hornby, an appointee of President George H.W. Bush, who presided over United States
of America v. Douglas, rightly took issue with this policy decision and noted the potentially absurd
consequences of doing so.4 In his opinion, Judge Hornby wrote, “What possible reason could there be to
want judges to continue to impose new sentences that are not „fair‟ over the next five years while the
statute of limitations runs? … I would find it gravely disquieting to apply hereafter a sentencing penalty
that Congress has declared to be unfair.”5
As Attorney General, you are well within the bounds of your authority to issue such guidance since there
is ample precedence for producing various memoranda addressing Department policies with respect to
charging, case disposition, and sentencing. Shortly after the constitutionality of the Sentencing Reform
Act was sustained by the Supreme Court in 1989, Attorney General Richard Thornburgh issued a
directive to federal prosecutors to ensure that their practices were consistent with the principles of equity,
fairness, and uniformity.
Several years later, Attorney General Janet Reno issued additional guidance to address the extent to which
a prosecutor‟s individualized assessment of the proportionality of particular sentences could be
considered. The recent passage of the FSA emphatically reaffirms Congress‟ intention that crack
defendants are entitled to fair treatment. It makes no sense to apply punishment differentially for
defendants whose conduct occurred a few days apart.
For these reasons, we call upon you to issue new guidance to all Justice Department prosecutors that
closely follows the Congressional intent behind the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 found in the legislative
history surrounding its passage. Such guidance necessarily entails seeking sentences consistent with the
Act‟s reduced mandatory minimums for defendants who have not yet been sentenced, regardless of when
their conduct took place.
Thank you for your consideration. If you have any questions, please contact Lisa Bornstein, Senior
Counsel, at (202) 263-2856, or Nancy Zirkin, at (202) 263-2880.
Sincerely,
4
Several other district courts have agreed, relying on Judge Hornby‟s opinion, see e.g., United States v. Johnson,
No. 6:08-cr-270 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 4, 2011) (Presnell, J.); United States v. English, No. 3:10-cr-53 (S.D. Iowa Dec. 30,
2010) (Pratt, J.) ; United States v. Gillam, No. 1:10-cr-181-2 (W.D. Mich. Dec. 3, 2010) (Neff, J.); United States v.
Jaimespimentz, No. 09-cr-488-3 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 24, 2010) (Baylson, J.); United States v. Angelo, Crim. No. 09-202
RWZ (Oct. 27, 2010) (Zobel, J.); United States v. Jones, No. 4:10 CR 233 (N.D. Ohio Jan. 3, 2011) (Dowd, J.);
United States v. Favors, No. 1-cr-00384-LY-1 (W.D. Tex. Nov. 23, 2010) (Yeakel, J.).
5
Douglas, _F. Supp.2d _, 2010 WL 4260221 (D. Maine, October 27, 2010) (Hornby J.).