Scholar Critic: Re-Telling The Narrative of Mahabharata in Contemporary Times From Gender Perspective
Scholar Critic: Re-Telling The Narrative of Mahabharata in Contemporary Times From Gender Perspective
Scholar Critic: Re-Telling The Narrative of Mahabharata in Contemporary Times From Gender Perspective
Dr Maneeta Kahlon
Assistant Professor English
Shanti Devi Arya Mahila College,
Dinanagar, Distt -Gurdaspur, Punjab.
Mahabharata is an amazingly sinuous yet cohesive work of art. It is an amazing book that
continues to inspire even 4000 years later this epic of India, has captivated the hearts of its
people for several millennia. Whether it is literature or vernacular arts, crafts, painting, music,
dance, and drama, or temple motifs, no aspect of Indian culture has escaped the stamp of their
influence. It is so wonderfully detailed and multi-dimensional that it has becomes a fit matter for
being adapted into the creative medium of literature and arts.
Contemporary Indian cinema and popular culture support the narrative of the book,
bringing modern valence to the arguments. In the late 1980s, the Mahabharat TV series, directed
by Ravi Chopra, was televised and shown on India's national television that is Doordarshan and
that was the greatest visual representation that had a devoted and bestowed audience. In the
Western world, a well-known presentation of the epic is Peter Brook's nine-hour play, which
premiered in Avignon in 1985, and its five-hour movie version The Mahabharata (1989)
Among literary reinterpretations of the Mahabharata the most famous is arguably Sashi
Tharoor's major work entitled The Great Indian Novel, an involved literary, philosophical, and
political novel which superimposes the major moments of post-independence India in the 20th
century onto the driving events of the Mahabharata epic but since this about the women
perspective I shall focus on those retellings that project feministic leanings. The existing
parochial and unwarranted norms were challenged and deconstructed with an effort to re-
conceptualise them such recasting often challenges the audience to reconsider marginalized
female figures as heroic protagonists.
50
Scholar Critic ISSN 2348 – 6945 (Online)
Vol-02, Issue-03, December 2015. www.scholarcritic.com
Bhishma Sahani’s Madhavi is one such work that focussed exclusively on the minor
character Madhavi, daughter of the King Yayati of the Mahabharata. In the epic Madhavi’s voice
is heard for a single time while stating her utility to Galav. Bhisham Sahani carved out a
humanised portrait of Madhavi from the puppet, which comes into the foreground, speaks, feels
and protests against politics of patriarchy. Retrieving Madhavi’s fading image and placing her at
the centre forecasts the tempestuous journey of the women from the shaded to the illumined area.
Shankar Shesh’s Komal Gandhar talks about his protagonist Gandhari. Shesh’s Gandhari
is not a passive victim; rather she is strong, assertive and articulate. In the play, Gandhari defies
the patriarchal interpretation of her blindfold as an act of obedience to her husband’s unlighted
world. She observed it as a mark of protest, anger and bitterness for negating her right to
swayamvara and getting her married to a blind man. In spite of her relentless effort to leave
behind the patriarchal discourse, she is always pulled back into it. Gandhari’s position in the play
reveals the real status of struggling women in their long way to their accomplished end.
Mahashweta Devi, the activist, re-casts Draupadi in a tribal backdrop of the Naxalbari
movement in a short story, Draupadi. To grant a more realistic essence, she modified her to tribal
Dopdi. Dopdi was a naxalite, arrested by the army and was assaulted by seven eight soldiers.
This assault can link itself to Draupadi’s undeserving polygamous marriage. When the army
chief wanted to question her, she tears up her remaining strips of clothes and defiantly stood
upright with her bruised face and heart in face to face with him. The armed commander was
thoroughly bewildered. Thus, Dopdi, the recast of Draupadi, challenges the patriarchal
establishment with her weapon of femininity. Mahashweta Devi in the disrobing of Draupadi
showed women own struggle to negotiate a hostile environment.
Mallika Sarabhai continued this theme in her play In Search of the Goddess, In the
introduction to her play, In Search of the Goddess, Sarabhai says that every construct around us
is a view through a single prism – ‘the prism of patriarchy’ . Mallika Sarabhai attempts to look at
it from ‘a non-male prism of change’. This modern Draupadi vents out her long suppressed
suffering in Sarabhai’s In Search of the Goddess, Draupadi was fortunate to have her
swayamvara, but in it she was only a ploy – she herself was ‘the garland’ (2). Her respected
51
Scholar Critic ISSN 2348 – 6945 (Online)
Vol-02, Issue-03, December 2015. www.scholarcritic.com
father and beloved brother arranged for a tournament. For the winner Draupadi was the prize.
Sarabhai’s Draupadi complains:
Sarabhai also talks of Savitri, the daughter of king Asvapati tied her wedding knot with
her self-arranged bridegroom, Satyavan, inspite of the warnings of Naradmuni that Satyavan’s
life would end on the completion of one year of their marriage. With the arrival of Yama on that
ill-fated day, Savitri defies him and wins back her husband’s life. The patriarchal interpretation
goes – Savitri refused to live without her husband, Satyavan. Sarabhai made her Savitri enunciate
the authentic and unprejudiced interpretation and its relevance in the contemporary era. An
underlying strain of the characteristic of modern women is found in Sarabhai’s Savitri. Her tone
throughout is not as submissive and accepting, like the one in the Mahabharata. In her dramatic
monologues she challenges Yama with arrows of questions.
52
Scholar Critic ISSN 2348 – 6945 (Online)
Vol-02, Issue-03, December 2015. www.scholarcritic.com
Sarabhai’s aim of recasting is to empower the women and to make them able to put up a strong
impediment against the application of blind social norms whimsically to chain their feet, under
the guise of religion, tradition or mythology.
Another dance drama is Gnosis which potrays the life of Gandhari where the story is
recast from her angle. Like the book by Manu Sharma Gandhari ke Atmakatha which is story of
Gandhari, what she saw and her dilemmas. Gandhari is a character present throughout the story
as the mother of the hundred sons who were the reason for the Great War, but she never comes in
the foreground in the story that is usually told from the Pandavas perspective. Amongst the
women of Mahabharat also the more powerful characters of Draupadi and Kunti overshadow her
throughout the story but here she is the agent through whom the story is presented through
Karna’s Wife: The Outcast’s Queen by Kavita Kane is another narratology that retells the story
of Mahabharata’s much loved hero Karna through his wife Uruvi’s perspective. Many of us
perhaps know little or nothing about Karna’s wives, family life and children and the effect war of
Kurukshetra had on them. Not many of us know about Vrushali, Karna’s first wife and their
seven children. Uruvi’s perspective reveals what we all know that in Mahabharata there are no
characters that are completely good or evil. Uruvi’s perspective brings a clarity and distinction to
the various important personalities and their shades along with interesting gender observations
about Kunti, Draupadi, Gandhari and Bhanumati. Also in this book Uruvi reveals the fact that
Karna and Draupadi loved each other.
53
Scholar Critic ISSN 2348 – 6945 (Online)
Vol-02, Issue-03, December 2015. www.scholarcritic.com
rending cries of help and anger due to the abuses heaped on her can almost be heard through the
pages. Draupadi is not mute. She does not believe that husband is God and she should always
obey him. She is full of women consciousness. As a daughter or even as a wife she asks so many
questions and declares doubts even regarding the dharma of a female on this earth to scholars.
Thus the author has tried her level best to present a Psychological picture of Krishana as a
woman living a predicament-ridden life, she was perhaps the strongest of them all, demanding
her rights in a male-dominated society, and fighting injustice any which way she could.
Beautiful, brave and controversial, the heroine of the Mahabharat continues to fascinate
writers and we have The Palace of Illusions by Chitra banerjee Divakaruni where we hear the
story from Draupadis angle. This book is a study of heroic femininity as it appears in the epic
Mahabharata, and focuses particularly on the roles of wife, daughter-in-law, and mother, on how
these women speak. As she mentions in the Author’s Note at the beginning of the book, while
there are a lot of strong, capable women in the Mahabharata, they aren’t fully fleshed out.
Divakaruni rectifies this by making Draupadi a three-dimensional, incredibly appealing woman.
That’s not to say she’s perfect – she is petty, selfish and vengeful much of the time. She behaves
like a real woman might.
Govind Nihalani adapted the great Indian epic Mahabharata into a film Kalyug by
weaving it into a corporate modern-day scenario. This was some thirty years before Prakash Jha
successfully aped the idea and applied it to a modern-day political setting called Rajneeti. Both
the movies were successful. Kalyug gives a heightened role to the women of both families,
particularly to Savitri, Subhadra.
54
Scholar Critic ISSN 2348 – 6945 (Online)
Vol-02, Issue-03, December 2015. www.scholarcritic.com
In Mahabharata, Draupadi, the wife of the mighty Pandava brothers was humiliated and
thus was responsible for leading her husband’s into action. Rekha as Draupadi is interestingly
enigmatic; She is the wife of Dharmraj (Eldest brother of the troika playing the Pandavas), and
throughout the movie comes across as having immense power on her husband and his brothers
especially on the youngest one as her character conveys volumes through silence. Many
relationships like her antagonism towards her husband are not implicitly stated. The relationship
is dysfunctional but there are no reasons given and her bond with Bharat raj who symbolizes
Arjun is very unclear Till the end there is no clarity whether their relationship is just one of
mutual respect or something more (In the Mahabharata there is no Bhabhi and Draupadi is
wedded to all the five brothers but it was implied that she had a soft corner for Arjun is this what
is explored here. Her dislike of Karana there is a passing reference that his marriage proposal
was rejected by Supriya. Draupadi-Karna relationship is clearly hinted in three different scenes
in Kalyug.
55
Scholar Critic ISSN 2348 – 6945 (Online)
Vol-02, Issue-03, December 2015. www.scholarcritic.com
men since eternity. She reminds him on how a sense of equal friendship had prevailed over her
as she ripped her saree to dress his bleeding wound, when he was attacked by Shishupal. Her
innocent questions like "If the same was acceptable then, why a hue and cry is raised today when
a woman stands up for a friend, who incidentally happens to be a man?"
Works Cited:
Devi, Mahasweta. Breast Stories. Trans. Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. New York: Seagull Books,
2010. Print.
Devi, Mahasweta.. Imaginary maps . Tr. Gayatri Chakravorty. Calcutta :Thema, 2001.
56