Accident Incidents - The Human Part 050318 PDF

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 32

Accidents &

Incidents:
The Human Part
Presented by: Bill Rigot
May 3, 2018
Agenda

 The Newtonian View of the World


 The “New View”
 Workers as Hazards or Heroes
 Learning Teams
 The Role of Managers and Supervisors as Motivators for Safety

2
First law of safety

Never take a sleeping pill


and a laxative at the same
time
In any order …..
3
First corollary

Never remove a safety


barrier
that has a dent in It

4
Two Views of Failure
Newtonian Complex-Adaptive

5
Newton’s Laws of Motion

I. A body in motion stays in motion; a body at rest stays at


rest… unless acted upon by another force
II. F = MA
III. For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction

6
The Significance of Sir Isaac

 The 3rd Law forms the basis of our notion of a “Root Cause”
 Root Cause Analysis (RCA) is essentially a retrospective and
linear look at accidents
 We believe (erroneously) that we can back calculate an
accident or event back to its root

7
What if Newton is Wrong?

8
A New View

9
Normal
Start Work
Event
Of Context:
Job Learning
Event
Normally
Successful!

Hazard

Safety Understood:
Drift and Accumulation
Used by permission; Todd Conklin
10
The Worker as Hazard or
Hero?

 Are workers to be protected against because of all the errors


they make?

OR

• Do workers adapt constantly to get the job done safely and


without which a company cannot be successful

11
Why do we perform
investigations?

 Blame and punish

OR

 Learn and Improve

12
You can’t do both

13
14
Thought Exercise

 A bat and ball cost $1.10


 The bat costs one dollar more than the ball
 How much does the ball cost?

Daniel Kahneman, Thinking, Fast and Slow, 2011


15
Was your answer 10¢????

16
Try This:

 Y= price of the ball


 X= price of the bat
 X + Y = $1.10
 Y + $1.00 = X
 (Y + 1.00) + y = 1.10
 2Y = .10
 Y = .05

17
10¢ is the result of “fast” thinking
5¢ is the result of “slow” thinking

Learning Teams try to stay in the “slow”


thinking mode most of the time

18
Learning Team Phases*

1. Determine the need for a Learning Team


2. First session: Learning Mode only
3. Provide “soak time”
4. Second session: Start in Learning Mode
5. Define current defenses/Build new ones
6. Tracking actions and criteria for closure
7. Communicate to other applicable areas

*Todd Conklin, Pre-Accident Investigations; Better Questions


19
1. Determine the Need for a
Learning Team

 Every variance from expected results may be worth


investigating
 Some variances are more information rich than others
 Where is context important?
 Start with events that cause actual harm
 Next priority are near misses (near hits)
 You don’t have enough time or money to investigate
everything

20
2. First Session: Learning Mode
only

 Gather the team


 Explain the process
 Goal setting & expectations
 Do some instruction on New View vs. Old View thinking
 No solutions
 Ask “how” not “why”
 Describe how work gets done
 What conditions needed to exist for this event to take place

21
3. Provide Soak Time

 Ideally provide a day to let the learning from the first session
soak in
 It’s OK to gather other information
 It’s also OK to add additional members to the team

22
4. Second Session: Start in
Learning Mode

 Recap learning from previous session


 Add new thoughts gained from soak time
 Transition from learning to action
 It’s time to begin to define solutions

23
5. Define current Defenses/Build
New Ones

 What defenses were you relying on to prevent this from


happening?
 How effective were they?
 What else do you need to keep this from happening?
 Micro-experiment to see what might work

24
6. Tracking actions and criteria
for closure

 Solutions must be mutually agreed on by the team, and


managers who have the resources to dedicate to the solutions
 Right now or later?
 Why don’t workers fix problems?:
 It’s not my job to fix it
 I’ll get in trouble if I fix it
 I don’t have authority to fix it

25
7. Communicate to other
applicable areas

 Learning Teams give workers the confidence to work safely


after an upset
 Learning Teams give the company the capacity to work more
safely
 Is there other extent out there?
 Extent of condition
 Extent of cause

26
Learning Team Phases

1. Determine the need for a Learning Team


2. First session: Learning Mode only
3. Provide “soak time”
4. Second session: Start in Learning Mode
5. Define current defenses/Build new ones
6. Tracking actions and criteria for closure
7. Communicate to other applicable areas

27
Some Considerations on
Learning Teams

 Learning Teams often conflict with well established


confirmation bias
 The desire to blame and punish is often more powerful than
the desire to learn and improve
 Newton’s Third Law often gets in the way in technical
organizations

28
The Role of Managers and
Supervisors

 Sidney Dekker:
 “To understand failure…we must understand our reaction to
failure”
 “People do not operate in a vacuum, where they can decide and
act all powerfully. To err or not to err is not a choice. Instead
people’s work is subject to and constrained by multiple factors “

29
Immediate Steps

Successful organizations seem to do four things very well:


• Constantly predicting the next failure
• Consistently reducing operational complication
• Respond with urgency to pre-cursor data
• Respond to actual events with deliberation

44
Questions?

45
For More Information

 Bill Rigot
[email protected]
 706-627-7590

 ITI HPI Class: July 9/10 Houston


 ITI Accident Investigation Class: July 11 Houston

View the ITI Human Performance


Improvement
full course details @ iti.com/hpi

32

You might also like