Blackmailing, Extortion and Sextortion
Blackmailing, Extortion and Sextortion
Blackmailing, Extortion and Sextortion
Differences
SEPTEMBER 29, 2019
BY AMNA
3
The digital world today is the dominant means of communication used by people in different
places, while this has been great in narrowing distances and facilitating day to day activities, it
has also provided a fertile soil for hostile acts/ behaviours to prosper. Online violence varies in
its forms and manifestations, however, in this piece I would like to address and explain three of
the most pervasive attitudes that are currently trending on social media platforms. Those being
blackmailing, extortion and sextortion.
Blackmailing and extortion are always mistaken for being synonymous, thus used
interchangeably and this could not be further from the truth. For starters, extortion refers to the
form of theft that occurs when an offender obtains money, property, or services from another
person through coercion; and “coercion” ranges from physical assault to verbal threats of future
harm. To further contextualize this act, let’s look into extortion that targets women, on both
online and offline platforms. These acts are often ascribed to the power imbalance that society
constructs between men and women. This provides even more methods of intimidation that an
offender can use against a victim.
On the other hand, blackmailing can be defined as an act of coercion using the threat of revealing
or publicizing either substantially true or false information about a person or people unless
certain demands are met. This information will most probably be damaging information that can
incriminate or defame the victim of blackmail, bearing in mind that most forms of blackmail are
performed using non-physical means. This gets us to put a line between extortion and
blackmailing, the fine difference lies within the concept of “revealing information”, as a form of
threat used against victims to obtain things against their volition. We can, therefore, say that
blackmailing is a form of extortion that possesses a narrower way of posing a threat. Again, we
can not help but wonder why women and girls are significantly more vulnerable to these kinds
of violations? My guess would be that the notion of “honor” is the driving force behind making
women particularly vulnerable to such infringements and also it is the force behind not only
perpetuating the behaviour but also providing safeguards to the perpetrators.
The significance of “honour” in this context stems from the fact that socially, the responsibility
of upholding a family’s honour “Sharaf” is inherently linked to how the women in that family
carry themselves and lead their lives. Placing this undue burden on women automatically makes
it the woman’s responsibility to protect and preserve her family’s reputation and social status and
thereby in the event that any of those things are endangered she is the first and only person to
blame. This gives us an insight into why women are particularly vulnerable to falling prey to
these vile transgressions. When the perpetrator realizes that his acts of aggression mean very
little when honour is involved, hence the blame automatically gets laid on the woman, the
offender will not only be encouraged to persist in carrying out these acts but will also have very
little reason to refrain from committing such violation since no form of deterrence s in place to
stop them. Furthermore, because of the big role “honour” plays in this crime, it becomes a one-
sided rapport in which the victim plays no part and bears all the blame and consequences. The
influence of “honour” is not limited to making women vulnerable to falling victims of such vile
crimes but it extends to weakening their ability to defend themselves and get the retribution they
deserve. In conservative communities when a woman falls victim to such acts, she is instantly
demonized and stripped off the benefit of the doubt as well as any right to defend herself and tell
her part of the story. This victim blaming dynamic that takes over once a woman’s private life is
exposed further encourages perpetrators to not only indulge in such behaviour but to also go as
far as fabricating stories about their victims just to extort them knowing that they would not face
any form of repercussions.