Rohm & Hass Casestudy
Rohm & Hass Casestudy
Rohm & Hass Casestudy
Strength Weakness
Customer Surplus Low need recognition
Safe Low product & brand
Easy to use awareness
Highly Effective
SWOT
Opportunity Threat
Great market potential Competition
Promotional campaign can Substitutes
help
New distribution system
STRENGTHS
Kathon MWX had a great market potential of more than $ 38 million. Moreover, similar to
the customers’ preference, the product was really easy and safe to use. What is more in its
advantages, the customers did not have to check its maintenance again and again. It was
highly effective for the small capacity systems and there was rarely an alternative available
for it. Furthermore, there was a great customer surplus; the number of customers for Kathon
MWX were far greater than Kathon 886 MW.
WEAKNESSES
The product awareness was very low among customers; many customers did not know if
there was an effective solution available for the treatment of small capacity containers. There
was also a lack of need recognition among customers. Also, the customers did not know
about the company; they did not know if MWX were the products of Rohm and Haas. The
distributors took advantage and sold it to the customers at a greater price. Furthermore, few
distributors felt that there was no incentive for them to sell the product.
OPPORTUNITIES
The product had great market potential and it was estimated that the number of end users
for MWX won’t run out. Moreover, the new market campaigns and strategies presented a lot
of opportunities for the success of the product. It is beneficial for the customers as it can cut
costs for customers because by using Kathon MWX the customers can hold the fluid longer
than ever.
THREATS
Major threats for the company are the threats of competition. There are other companies
which have nearly equal market share as of Rohm and Haas; 15-20 %. There is no
substitute available at this time; however, there would be likely threat of substitutes in future.
The customer’s survey also revealed that there was less need recognition in the customers
for the dermatitis. Most of the customers were either not aware of Kathon MWX or they did
not know the benefits of the MWX. There were many customers who did not have tried it one
either.
Therefore, Joan Macey’s dilemma is valid and the situation needs to be addressed.
Competition Analysis
MWX has two competitors, first one is Dowicil 75 but this product is not really a competitor
because it is just useful for tanks over 500gallons. The other competitor is TrisNitro. So, the
competition in the market with only 2 competitors.
Marketing Objective
● Standardising the product cross the channel
● Increasing the product cost gradually to the nearest competition in order to establish
product superiority
● Using the same distribution channel with training and educating the distributor about
the product to increase the sales, visibility and awareness of kathon MWX among
end users
● To increase the market share on yearly basis
○ 1st Year = $1 million or 5 %
○ 2nd Year= $2 million or 10%
○ 3rd Year= $4 million or 20%
Product Objective
● Eliminate odour
● Controls bacteria and fungus
● Convenient and safe to use
● Cost effective
Product Category
Product Mix
Product Positioning
The Kathon MWX product should be positioned as the
‘ Easy handling, cost effective biocide which increases the fluid life and reduces downtime ’
*More emphasis on the easy handling aspect because of the disposable packaging.
Product Level Offering
Core
● To Curb the growth of odor causing bacteria in metalworking fluid with affecting the
performance.
● Increase the life of metalworking fluid
Tangible
● Comes in small quantity sachets
● Easy to use
● water soluble packaging with no necessary of plastic hanger
Augmented
● Guarantee of upto 4 weeks on product life
● Onsite assistance of product use and disposal