CH20 PDF
CH20 PDF
CH20 PDF
Chapter - 20
**1. A private pension plan is an arrangement whereby a company undertakes to provide its retired
employees with benefits that can be determined or estimated in advance from the provisions of a
document or from the company’s practices.
In a contributory pension plan the employees bear part of the cost of the stated benefits
whereas in a noncontributory plan the employer bears the entire cost.
**2. A defined contribution plan specifies the employer’s contribution to the plan usually based on a
formula, which may consider such factors as age, length of service, employer’s profit, or
compensation levels.
A defined benefit plan specifies a determinable pension benefit that the employee will receive at
a time in the future. The employer must determine the amount that should be contributed now to
provide for the future promised benefits.
In a defined contribution plan, the employer’s obligation is simply to make a contribution to the
plan each year based on the plan formula. The benefit of gain or risk of loss from assets con-
tributed to the plan is borne by the employee. In a defined benefit plan, the employer’s obli-
gation is to make sufficient contributions each year to provide for the promised future benefits.
Therefore, the employer is at risk to the extent that contributions will not be adequate to meet the
promised benefits.
**3. The employer is the organization sponsoring the pension plan. The employer incurs the costs
and makes contributions to the pension fund. Accounting for the employer involves: (1) allocating
the cost of the pension plan to the proper accounting periods, (2) measuring the amount of
pension obligation resulting from the plan, and (3) disclosing the status and effects of the plan in
the financial statements.
The pension fund or plan is the entity which receives the contributions from the employer, adminis-
ters the pension assets, and makes the benefit payments to the pension recipients. Accounting
for the fund involves identifying receipts as contributions from the employer sponsor, income from
fund investments, and computing the amounts due to individual pension recipients. Accounting for
the pension costs and obligations of the employer is the topic of this chapter; accounting for the
pension fund is not.
**4. When the term “fund” is used as a noun, it refers to assets accumulated in the hands of a
funding agency for the purpose of meeting pension benefits when they become due. When the
term “fund” is used as a verb, it means to pay over to a funding agency (as to fund future pension
benefits or to fund pension cost).
**5. An actuary’s role is to ensure that the company has established an appropriate funding pattern to
meet its pension obligations, to make predictions and assumptions about future events and
conditions that affect pension costs, and to assist the accountant in measuring facets of the pen-
sion plan that must be reported (costs, liabilities and assets). In order to determine the company’s
pension obligation, the actuary must first determine the expected benefits that will be paid in the
future. To accomplish this requires the actuary to make actuarial assumptions, which are esti-
mates of the occurrence of future events affecting pension costs, such as mortality, withdrawals,
disablement and retirement, changes in compensation, and changes in discount rates to reflect
the time value of money.
**6. In measuring the amount of pension benefits under a defined benefit pension plan, an actuary
must consider such factors as mortality rates, employee turnover, interest and earnings rates,
early retirement frequency, and future salaries.
1
Questions Chapter 20 (Continued)
**7. One measure of the pension obligation is the vested benefit obligation. This measure uses only
current salary levels and includes only vested benefits; that is, benefits the employee is already
entitled to receive even if the employee renders no additional services under the plan.
A company’s accumulated benefit obligation is the actuarial present value of benefits attributed
by the pension benefit formula to service before a specified date and is based on employee
service and compensation prior to that date. The accumulated benefit obligation differs from the
defined benefit obligation in that it includes no assumption about future compensation levels. The
defined benefit obligation is based on vested and nonvested services using future salaries.
**8. Cash-basis accounting recognizes pension cost as being equal to the amount of cash paid by
the employer to the pension fund in any period; pension funding serves as the basis for expense
recognition under the cash basis.
Not infrequently, the amount which an employer must fund for pension purposes during a particular
period is unrelated to the economic benefits derived from the pension plan in that period. Cash-
basis accounting recognizes the amount funded as periodic pension cost and the amount funded
may be discretionary and vary widely from year to year. Funding is a matter of financial
management, based on working capital availability, tax considerations, and other matters
unrelated to accounting considerations.
9. The net defined benefit obligation (asset) is the deficit or surplus related to a defined pension
plan. The deficit or surplus is the defined benefit obligation less the fair value of plan assets (if
any). The deficit or surplus is often referred to as the funded status of the plan. If the defined
benefit obligation is greater than the plan assets, the pension plan has a deficit. Conversely if the
defined pension obligation is less than the plan assets, the pension plan has a surplus.
10. The three components of the change in the net benefit obligation (asset) and their reporting are:
Service cost. Service cost is either current service cost or past service cost. Current service cost
is the increase in the defined benefit obligation from employee service in the current period. Past
service cost is the change in the present value of the defined benefit obligation for employee
service for prior periods -- generally resulting from a plan amendment (for example, changes to
the plan). This component is reported in the statement of comprehensive income in the operating
section of the statement and affects net income.
Net interest. Net interest is the net amount computed by multiplying the discount rate by the plan
assets and the defined benefit obligation. If the plan has a net defined benefit obligation at the
end of the period, the company reports interest expense. Conversely if it has a net defined
benefit asset, it reports interest revenue. This approach is justified on the basis of its simplicity
and that any financing costs should be based on the funded status of the plan. This amount is
often shown below the operating section of the income statement in the financing section and
affects net income.
Remeasurements. Remeasurements are gains and losses related to the defined benefit
obligation (changes in discount rate or other actuarial assumptions) and gains or losses on the
fair value of the plan assets (actual rate of return less interest revenue included in the finance
component). This component is reported in other comprehensive income, net of tax. These
remeasurement gains or losses therefore affect comprehensive income but not net income.
2
Questions Chapter 20 (Continued)
(1) Service cost component—the actuarial present value of benefits attributed by the pension
benefit formula to employee service during the period, including past service costs
(amendments and cutailments).
(2) Interest expense component—the increase in the defined benefit obligation as a result of
the passage of time, computed as the discount rate multiplied by the defined benefit
obligation.
(3) Interest revenue component—interest earned on the plan assets by multiplying the
discount rate by the plan assets.
Note to instructor: The net of interest expense and interest revenue is referred to as net interest.
Any difference between interest revenue and the actual return on plan assets is recorded in other
comprehensive income, not in pension expense.
12. The service cost component of pension expense is determined as the actuarial present value
of benefits attributed by the pension benefit formula to employee service during the period. The
plan’s benefit formula provides a measure of how much benefit is earned and, therefore, how
much cost is incurred in each individual period. The IASB concluded that future compensation
levels had to be considered in measuring the present obligation and periodic pension expense if
the plan benefit formula incorporated them.
13. Net interest is defined as the amount that accrues by multiplying the net defined benefit
obligation by the discount rate (using defined benefit obligation and the pension asset balances
as of the beginning of the year. The discount rate is based on the yields of high-quality bonds
with terms consistent with the company’s pension obligation. Net interest is then computed as
indicated in the following equation.
Net Interest = [Defined Benefit Obligation X Discount Rate] – [Plan Assets X Discount Rate]
Because payment of the pension obligation is deferred, companies record the pension liability
on a discounted basis. As a result, the liability accrues interest over the service life of the
employee (passage of time), which is essentially interest expense. Similarly, companies earn a
return on plan assets. That is, a company assumes that it earns interest based on multiplying
the discount rate by the plan assets. Net interest is a component of pension expense, which is
reported in net income. Note that the actual return on plan assets may differ from the assumed
interest revenue computed, resulting in an unrealized gain or loss on plan assets. These gains
or losses are recorded in other comprehensive income.
3
Questions Chapter 20 (Continued)
15. Service cost is the actuarial present value of benefits attributed by the pension benefit formula to
employee service during the period. Actuaries compute service cost at the present value of
the new benefits earned by employees during the year. Past service cost is the change in the
defined benefit obligation (either positive or negative) resulting from a plan amendment or
curtailment. Also included in past service costs are the reduction in benefits, arising from
curtailments – a significant reduction in the number of employees covered by the plan. The cost of
the retroactive benefits is the increase in the defined benefit obligation at the date of the
amendment and is recognized in pension expense in the period of the change.
16. When a defined benefit plan is either initiated or amended, credit is often given to employees for
years of service provided before the date of initiation or amendment. The cost of these retroactive
benefits are referred to as past service costs. Employers grant retroactive benefits because they
expect to receive benefits in the future. Also included in past service costs are the reduction in
benefits, arising from curtailments – a significant reduction in the number of employees covered by
the plan. The cost of the retroactive benefits is the increase in the defined benefit obligation at the
date of the amendment and is recognized in pension expense in the period of the change.
17. Also included in past service costs are the reduction in benefits, arising from curtailments. A
curtailment is a significant reduction in the benefit obligation due to a significant reduction in the
number of employees covered by the plan (for example, due to a restructuring or down-sizing of
operations). The curtailments are recognized in pension expense in the period of the change.
18. Sarah is not correct in her assertion. Remeasurements arise from sudden and large changes in
the fair value of plan assets or changes in actuarial assumptions that affect the amount of the
defined benefit obligation. Remeasurements are recognized in other comprehensive income (and
they are never “recycled” into net income in subsequent periods). Thus, remeasurements do not
affect pension expense and net income. The rationale for this reporting is that the predictive
nature of remeasurements is much different than the other two components of pension cost --
service cost and net interest.
19. An asset gain occurs when the actual return on the plan assets is greater than the interest
revenue on plan assets while an asset loss occurs when the actual return is less than the
interest revenue on the plan assets.
20. Liability gains and losses are unexpected gains or losses from changes in the defined benefit
obligation. Liability gains (resulting from unexpected decreases) and liability losses (resulting
from unexpected increases) are recognized in other comprehensive income in the Other
Comprehensive Income account (along with asset gains and losses). They are accumulated from
year to year Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income and are not recycled to net income in
subsequent periods.
21. If pension expense recognized in a period exceeds the current amount funded, a liability account
referred to as Pension Liability arises; the current portion is reported as a current liability, if due
in 12 months. Otherwise, report as non-current.
If the current amount funded exceeds the amount recognized as pension expense, an asset
account referred to as Pension Asset arises; it is reported in the other assets section. Often, one
general account is used, referred to as Pension Asset/Liability. If it has a credit balance, it is
identified as a liability; if a debit balance, it is an asset.
4
Questions Chapter 20 (Continued)
*22. Bill is not correct. Liability gains and losses, although not included in pension expense, are
recorded in other comprehensive income in the period that they arise. Total comprehensive
income is comprised of net income (including pension expense) and other comprehensive
income. Thus, total comprehensive income will include the gains and losses. A similar analysis
applies to asset gains and losses.
*23. Jacob Inc. would report a pension liability of €27,000 (€125,000 – €98,000).
*24. Joshua Co. would report a pension asset of £10,000 (£345,000 – £335,000).
Note: The liability gain is recognized in the defined benefit obligation and is reflected in the net
pension asset.
*25. (a) A contributory plan is a pension plan under which employees contribute part of the cost.
In some contributory plans, employees wishing to be covered must contribute; in other
contributory plans, employee contributions result in increased benefits.
(b) Vested benefits are benefits for which the employee’s right to receive a present or future
pension benefit is no longer contingent on remaining in the service of the employer.
(c) Retroactive benefits are benefits granted in a plan amendment (or initiation) that are
attributed by the pension benefit formula to employee services rendered in periods prior to
the amendment.
*26. Compromises by the IASB to full capitalization or recognition in the financial statements of
relevant pension data resulted in nonrecognition of the defined benefit obligation and plan assets
on a gross basis. These unrecognized items (as well as changes in the items during the period)
are disclosed in a separate schedule in such a way that the total obligation and funded status
(either over- or underfunded) of the pension plan are reconciled to the pension asset/liability
reported in the statement of financial position by acknowledging the unrecognized pension
elements (defined benefit obligation and plan assets).
27. Postretirement benefits other than pensions include healthcare and other welfare benefits
provided to retirees, their spouses, dependents, and beneficiaries. The other welfare benefits
include life insurance offered outside a pension plan, dental care as well as medical care, eye
care, legal and tax services, tuition assistance, day care, and housing activities.
28. The major differences between pension benefits and postretirement benefits are listed below:
Additionally, although healthcare benefits are generally covered by the fiduciary and reporting
standards for employee benefit funds, in many jurisdictions the stringent minimum vesting,
participation, and funding standards that apply to pensions do not apply to healthcare benefits.
5
Questions Chapter 20 (Continued)
29. The underlying concepts for the accounting for postretirement benefits are similar between U.S.
GAAP and IFRS—both U.S. GAAP and IFRS view pensions and other postretirement benefits as
forms of deferred compensation. Other similarities include: (1) IFRS and U.S. GAAP separate
pension plans into defined contribution plans and defined benefit plans. The accounting for
defined contribution plans is similar. (2) Both IFRS and U.S. GAAP compute unrecognized past
service costs (PSC) (referred to as prior service cost in U.S. GAAP) in the same manner. (3)
Both U.S. GAAP and IFRS include interest expense on the liability in pension expense.
Regarding asset returns, IFRS reduces pension expense by the amount of interest revenue
(based on the discount rate times the beginning fair value of pension assets).
Differences include: (1) IFRS recognizes past service cost as a component of pension expense in
income immediately. U.S. GAAP amortizes PSC over the remaining service lives of employees.
(2) U.S. GAAP includes an asset return component based on the expected return on plan assets;
(3) Under IFRS, companies recognize both liability and asset losses (referred to as
remeasurements) in other comprehensive income. These gains and losses are not ‘recycled’ into
income in subsequent periods. U.S. GAAP recognizes liability and asset gains and losses in
“Accumulated other comprehensive income” and amortized these amounts to income over
remaining service lives, using the “corridor approach”.
30. The IASB and the FASB have been working collaboratively on a postretirement benefit project.
The recent amendments issued by the IASB moves IFRS closer to U.S. GAAP with respect to
recognition of the funded status on the statement of financial position. However, as illustrated in
the “About the Numbers” section, significant differences remain in the components of pension
expense. The FASB is expected to begin work on a project, which will reexamine expense
measurement of postretirement benefit plans. The FASB likely will consider the recent IASB
amendments in this area, which could lead to a converged standard.
6
SOLUTIONS TO BRIEF EXERCISES
UDDIN COMPANY
General Journal Entries Memo Record
Pension Defined
Pension Asset/ Benefit Plan
Items Expense Cash Liability Obligation Assets
1/1/15 250,000 Cr. 250,000 Dr.
Service cost 27,500 Dr. 27,500 Cr.
Interest expense 25,000 Dr. 25,000 Cr.
Interest revenue 25,000 Cr. 25,000 Dr.
Contributions 20,000 Cr. 20,000 Dr.
Benefits 17,500 Dr. 17,500 Cr.
Journal entry 27,500 Dr. 20,000 Cr. 7,500 Cr.
12/31/15 7,500 Cr. 285,000 Cr. 277,500 Dr.
7
BRIEF EXERCISE 20-4
Pension expense
Service cost (current)........................................................ $ 23,000
Past service cost ............................................................... 120,000
Net interest ......................................................................... 8,000
$151,000
8
12
20-
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Annual
Pension Pension Defined Benefit
Items Expense Cash OCI - Gain/Loss Asset/Liability Obligation Plan Assets
Balance, January
1, 2015 200,000 Cr. 3,100,000 Cr. 2,900,000 Dr.
Kieso, IFRS, 2/e, Solutions Manual
Accumulated OCI
12/31/14 0
Balance, Dec. 31,
2015 428,000 Dr. 490,000 Cr. 3,600,000 Cr. 3,110,000 Dr.
9
BRIEF EXERCISE 20-9
10
SOLUTIONS TO EXERCISES
11
EXERCISE 20-3 (15–25 minutes)
2/e, Solutions Manual
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
VELDRE COMPANY
Pension Worksheet—2015
General Journal Entries Memo Record
Annual Cash Pension Defined Plan Assets
(For Instructor Use Only)
12
20-
EXERCISE 20-4 (10–15 minutes)
16
20-
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
BOUDREAU INC.
Pension Worksheet—2015
General Journal Entries Memo Record
Annual Pension Defined
Pension Asset/ Benefit Plan
Items Expense Cash Liability Obligation Assets
Balance, January 1, 2015 490,000 Cr. 490,000 Dr.
Service cost 40,000 Dr. 40,000 Cr.
Kieso, IFRS, 2/e, Solutions Manual
13
EXERCISE 20-5 (10–15 minutes)
14
EXERCISE 20-6 (15–25 minutes)
18
20-
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
YANG CORP.
Pension Worksheet—2015
General Journal Entries Memo Record
Annual Pension Defined
Pension Asset/ Benefit Plan
Items Expense Cash Liability Obligation Assets
Balance, Dec. 31, 2014 13,800 Cr. 560,000 Cr. 546,200 Dr.
Prior service cost 120,000 Dr. 120,000 Cr.
Balance, Jan. 1, 2015 680,000 Cr. 546,200 Dr.
Service cost 58,000 Dr. 58,000 Cr.
Interest expense* 61,200 Dr. 61,200 Cr.
Interest revenue** 49,158 Cr. 49,158 Dr.
Contributions 65,000 Cr. 65,000 Dr.
Kieso, IFRS, 2/e, Solutions Manual
15
2/e, Solutions Manual
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
(a)
(For Instructor Use Only)
Annual
Pension Pension Defined Benefit
Expense Cash OCI - Gain/Loss Asset/Liability Obligation Plan Assets
Kieso, IFRS,
16
20-
EXERCISE 20-7 (Continued)
(c) The pension loss of $137,000 ($48,000 asset loss; $89,000 liability loss)
is recognized in other comprehensive income. The balance at 12/31/15
of $137,000 is reported in accumulated other comprehensive income in
shareholders’ equity.
17
EXERCISE 20-8 (Continued)
Gain/Loss
Balance Jan. 1, 2015 € 0
Asset loss* 6,700 Dr.
Balance Dec. 31, 2015 € 6,700 Dr.
*€136,700 – €130,000.
18
EXERCISE 20-8 (Continued)
22
20-
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
19
EXERCISE 20-9 (20-25 minutes)
2/e, Solutions Manual
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
20
20-
EXERCISE 20-10 (20–30 minutes)
21
EXERCISE 20-11 (20–30 minutes)
Equity
Accumulated OCI (G/L) .................................. € 200,000
22
EXERCISE 20-11 (Continued)
26
20-
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Note to instructor: To prove the amounts reported, a worksheet might be prepared as follows:
*€1,500,000 X 10%.
**€800,000 X 10%.
(For Instructor Use On
23
EXERCISE 20-12 (35–45 minutes)
(b) Computation of pension liability gains and losses and pension asset gains and losses.
(c) The amount recorded in other comprehensive income is the asset gain and
liability loss:
Asset gain .................................................................................... £ 250
Liability loss ................................................................................ 350
Net loss ........................................................................................ 100
Accumulated OCI (G/L)
12/31/15 ........................................................................................ 0
Accumulated OCI (G/L) ........................................................................ £ 100
24
EXERCISE 20-13 (40–50 minutes)
28
20-
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
ERICKSON COMPANY
Pension Worksheet—2015
General Journal Entries Memo Record Entries
Defined
Annual Pension OCI— Pension Benefit Plan
Items Expense Cash Gain/Loss Asset/Liability Obligation Assets
Balance, Jan. 1, 2015 800 Cr. 2,500 Cr. 1,700 Dr.
Service cost 400 Dr. 400 Cr.
Interest expense(a) 250 Dr. 250 Cr.
Interest revenue(b) 170 Cr. 170 Dr.
Contributions 700 Cr. 700 Dr.
Benefits 200 Dr. 200 Cr.
Asset gain (c) 250 Cr. 250 Dr.
Liability increase(d) 350 Dr. 350 Cr.
Journal entry for 2015 480 Dr. 700 Cr. 100 Dr. 120 Dr.
Accumulated OCI, Dec. 31, 2014 0
Kieso, IFRS, 2/e, Solutions Manual
Balance, Dec. 31, 2015 100 Dr. 680 Cr. 3,300 Cr. 2,620 Dr.
(a)
£2,500 X 10%
(b)
£1,700 X 10%
(c)
Actual return £420
Interest revenue (£1,700 X 10%) (170)
Asset gain £250
(d)
£350 = £3,300 – (£2,500 + £400 + £250 – £200)
(For Instructor Use On
25
EXERCISE 20-13 (Continued)
Liabilities
Pension liability ............................................. £680
Shareholders’ equity
Accumulated other comprehensive
loss (G/L) .................................................... £100
*$25,000 + $32,500
26
EXERCISE 20-14 (Continued)
30
20-
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Balance, Dec. 31, 2015 57,500 Cr. 815,000 Cr. 757,500 Dr.
*$700,000 – $25,000.
**$675,000 X 10%
(For Instructor Use On
27
EXERCISE 20-15 (20–25 minutes)
(a) Below is the completed worksheet, indicating debit and credit entries.
28
EXERCISE 20-17 (25–30 minutes)
29
EXERCISE 20-20 (15–20 minutes)
2/e, Solutions Manual
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
ENGLEHART CO.
Postretirement Benefit Worksheet—2015
(For Instructor Use Only)
*(€760,000 X 9%)
**(€710,000 X 9%)
***€63,900 – €62,000
30
20-
*EXERCISE 20-21 (25–30 minutes)
(a) Below is the completed worksheet, indicating debit and credit entries.
(c) The discount (settlement) rate can be determined by dividing the interest
expense by the beginning DPBO:
€36,900 ÷ €410,000 = 9%
31
TIME AND PURPOSE OF PROBLEMS
32
Time and Purpose of Problems (Continued)
33
(a)
2/e, Solutions Manual
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
HARRINGTON COMPANY
Pension Worksheet––2015 and 2016
SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEMS
General Journal Entries Memo Record
Annual Defined
Items Pension OCI—Gain/ Pension Benefit Plan
Expense Cash Loss Asset/Liability Obligation Assets
Balance, Jan. 1, 2015 300,000 Cr. 4,500,000 Cr. 4,200,000 Dr.
(For Instructor Use Only)
PROBLEM 20-1
Interest expense* 450,000 Dr. 450,000 Cr.
Interest revenue** 420,000 Cr. 420,000 Dr.
Contributions 240,000 Cr. 240,000 Dr.
Benefits 200,000 Dr. 200,000 Cr.
Journal entry for 2015 180,000 Dr. 240,000 Cr. 0 60,000 Dr.
Accumulated OCI, Dec. 31, 2014
Kieso, IFRS,
Balance, Dec. 31, 2015 240,000 Cr. 4,900,000 Cr. 4,660,000 Dr.
Additional PSC, 1/1/2016 500,000 Dr. 500,000 Cr.
Balance, Jan. 1, 2016 5,400,000 Cr.
Service cost 180,000 Dr. 180,000 Cr.
Interest expense** 540,000 Dr. 540,000 Cr.
Interest revenue 466,000 Cr. 466,000 Dr.
Contributions 285,000 Cr. 285,000 Dr.
Benefits 280,000 Dr. 280,000 Cr.
Asset loss**** 206,000 Dr. 206,000 Cr.
Journal entry for 2016 754,000 Dr. 285,000 Cr. 206,000 Dr. 675,000 Cr.
Accumulated OCI, Dec. 31, 2015 0
Balance, Dec. 31, 2016 206,000 Dr. 915,000 Cr. 5,840,000 Cr. 4,925,000 Dr.
34
20-
38
20-
JACKSON COMPANY
Pension Worksheet—2014, 2015, 2016
General Journal Entries Memo Record
Annual Defined
Pension OCI— Pension Benefit Plan
Expense Cash Gain/Loss Asset/Liability Obligation Assets
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
PROBLEM 20-2
Kieso, IFRS, 2/e, Solutions Manual
35
PROBLEM 20-2 (Continued)
Worksheet computations:
(a)
$25,000 = $250,000 X 10%
(b)
$200,000 X 10%
(c)
$43,700 = $437,000 X 10%
(d)
$222,000 X 10%
(e)
$22,200 – $22,000
(f)
$48,330 = $483,300 X 10%
(g)
$267,600 X 10%
(h)
$26,760 – $24,000
(i)
$16,630 = ($483,300 + $26,000 + $48,330 – $21,000 – $520,000)
(b) Journal entries:
2014
Pension Expense ...................................................... 21,000
Cash ................................................................... 16,000
Pension Asset /Liability .................................... 5,000
2015
Pension Expense ...................................................... 200,500
Other Comprehensive Income (G/L) ....................... 200
Cash ................................................................... 40,000
Pension Asset /Liability .................................... 160,700
2016
Pension Expense ...................................................... 47,570
Pension Asset /Liability ............................................ 14,300
Other Comprehensive Income (G/L) ................ 13,870
Cash ................................................................... 48,000
36
PROBLEM 20-2 (Continued)
37
PROBLEM 20-3
38
PROBLEM 20-3 (Continued)
(2) 12/31/15 fair value of plan assets £276,000
Less: Expected fair value
1/1/15 fair value of plan
assets £200,000
Add Interest revenue
(10% X £200,000) 20,000
Add pension plan contribution 65,000
Less benefit payments 0
285,000
Asset loss 9,000
Net loss at 12/31/15 (£20,000 liability
loss + £9,000) £29,000
The £29,000 net loss in the accumulated OCI (G/L) account becomes
the beginning balance in 2016.
39
PROBLEM 20-3 (Continued)
2/e, Solutions Manual
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
(For Instructor Use Only)
40
20-
PROBLEM 20-4
2015 2016
Service cost ........................................................ ($60,000 $90,000
Interest expense ($700,000 X .09)
and ($800,000 X .09) ...................................... 63,000 72,000
Interest revenue ($560,000 X .09) and
($699,000 X .09) ............................................... (50,400) (62,910)
Pension expense ............................................... ($72,600 ($99,090
(b)
2015
Pension Asset/Liability ..................................... (39,000
Pension Expense .............................................. 72,600
Other Comprehensive Income (G/L) ................ 3,400
Cash.............................................................. (115,000
2016
Pension Expense ................................................ 99,090
Other Comprehensive Income (G/L) ................. 32,910
Cash......................................................... 120,000
Pension Asset / Liability.......................... 12,000
41
PROBLEM 20-4 (Continued)
2/e, Solutions Manual
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
*($700,000 – $140,000)
**($700,000 + $60,000 + $63,000) – $800,000
42
20-
PROBLEM 20-5
(a) Pension expense for 2015 consisted only of the service cost component
amounting to €60,000. There was no net gain or loss, plan assets, or
defined benefit obligation as of January 1, 2015.
43
PROBLEM 20-5 (Continued)
Journal Entries—2016
Pension Expense ...................................................... 86,100
Other Comprehensive Income (G/L) ....................... 78,900
Cash ................................................................... 60,000
Pension Asset /Liability .................................... 105,000
Journal Entries—2017
Pension Expense ....................................................... 128,200
Other Comprehensive Income (G/L) ........................ 5,800
Cash .................................................................... 105,000
Pension Asset /Liability ..................................... 29,000
44
PROBLEM 20-5 (Continued)
48
20-
Annual Defined
Pension OCI— Pension Benefit Plan
Expense Cash Gain/Loss Asset/Liability Obligation Assets
Balance, Jan. 1, 2015
Service cost 60,000 Dr. 60,000 Cr.
Interest expense
Interest revenue
Contributions 50,000 Cr. 50,000 Dr.
Journal entry for 2015 60,000 Dr. 50,000 Cr. 10,000 Cr.
Accumulated OCI, Dec. 31, 2014
Balance, Dec. 31, 2015 10,000 Cr. 60,000 Cr. 50,000 Dr.
45
PROBLEM 20-6
*$4,850,000 – $4,100,000
Journal Entries—2015
Pension Expense ................................................... 400,000
Pension Asset /Liability ......................................... 1,250,000
Other Comprehensive Income (G/L) ............. 875,000
Cash ................................................................ 775,000
46
PROBLEM 20-6 (Continued)
47
PROBLEM 20-6 (Continued)
2/e, Solutions Manual
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Annual Defined
Pension OCI— Pension Benefit Plan
Expense Cash Gain/Loss Asset/Liability Obligation Assets
Balance, Jan. 1, 2015 2,000,000 Cr. 5,000,000 Cr. 3,000,000 Dr.
Service cost 200,000 Dr. 200,000 Cr.
Interest expense* 500,000 Dr. 500,000 Cr.
Kieso, IFRS,
*$5,000,000 X 10%
**$3,000,000 X 10%.
***$325,000 – $300,000.
48
20-
52
20-
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Annual Defined
Pension HANSON CORP.
OCI— Penison Benefit Plan
Items Expense Pension
Cash Worksheet—2015
Gain/Loss Asset/Liability Obligation Assets
General Journal Entries Memo Record
Balance, Jan. 1, 2012 180,000 Cr. 700,000 Cr. 520,000 Dr.
Annual Defined
Service cost 108,000 Dr. 108,000 Cr.
Pension OCI— Penison Benefit Plan
Interest expense* 63,000 Dr. 63,000 Cr.
Items Expense Cash Gain/Loss Asset/Liability Obligation Assets
Interest revenue** 52,000 Cr. 52,000 Dr.
Balance, Jan. 1, 2015 180,000 Cr. 700,000 Cr. 520,000 Dr.
Service cost 108,000 Dr. 108,000 Cr.
Interest expense* 63,000 Dr. 133,000 Cr. 63,000 Cr.
PROBLEM 20-7
Contributions 133,000 Dr.
Kieso, IFRS, 2/e, Solutions Manual
Interest
Benefitsrevenue** 46,800 Cr. 46,800
85,000 Dr. 85,000 Cr.Dr.
Contributions
Asset loss** 133,000 Cr. 4,000 Dr. 133,000
4,000 Cr.Dr.
Benefits
Journal entry for 2012 119,000 Dr. 133,000 Cr. 4,000 Dr. 10,000 Dr. 85,000 Dr. 85,000 Cr.
Asset gain**
Accumulated OCI, Dec. 31, 2011 1,200 Cr.
91,000 Dr. 1,200 Dr.
Journal
Balance,entry
Dec. for
31, 2015
2012 124,200 Dr. 133,000 Cr. 1,200 Cr.
92,300 10,000Cr.
Dr. 170,000 Dr. 786,000 Cr. 616,000 Dr.
Accumulated OCI, Dec. 31, 2014 91,000 Dr.
Balance, Dec.
*£63,000 31, 2015 X .09.
= £700,000 89,800 Dr. 170,000 Cr. 786,000 Cr. 616,000 Dr.
**£520,000 X .09.
***£4,000 == (£520,000
*£63,000 £700,000 XX .09.
.10) – $48,000.
**£520,000 X .09.
(For Instructor Use On
49
2/e, Solutions Manual
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
LEMKE COMPANY
Pension Worksheet—2015 and 2016
General Journal Entries Memo Record
Annual Pension Defined
Pension OCI— Asset/ Benefit
Items Expense Cash Gain/Loss Liability Obligation Plan Assets
Balance, Jan. 1, 2015 190,000 Cr. 600,000 Cr. 410,000 Dr.
(For Instructor Use Only)
PROBLEM 20-8
Interest expense(a) 60,000 Dr. 60,000 Cr.
Interest revenue(b) 41,000 Cr. 41,000 Dr.
Contributions 97,000 Cr. 97,000 Dr.
Benefits 31,500 Dr. 31,500 Cr.
Asset loss(c) 5,000 Dr. 5,000 Cr.
Kieso, IFRS,
50
20-
PROBLEM 20-8 (Continued)
Worksheet computations:
(a)
R60,000 = R600,000 X 10%.
(b)
R410,000 X 10%
(c)
R41,000 – R36,000.
(d)
R75,550 = R755,500 X 10%.
(e)
R511,500 X 10%
(f)
R51,150 – R61,000.
(b) 2015
Pension Expense ....................................................... 59,000
Other Comprehensive Income (G/L) ......................... 92,000
Cash ..................................................................... 97,000
Pension Asset /Liability ...................................... 54,000
2016
Pension Asset /Liability.............................................. 7,450
Pension Expense ....................................................... 83,400
Cash ..................................................................... 81,000
Other Comprehensive Income (G/L) ................. 9,850
51
PROBLEM 20-8 (Continued)
52
PROBLEM 20-9
53
(a) HOBBS COMPANY
54
20-
58
20-
Annual Defined
Pension OCI— Pension Benefit Plan
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
PROBLEM 20-10
Benefits 15,000 Dr. 15,000 Cr.
Asset gain 1,600 Cr. 1,600 Dr.
Liability loss 43,500 Dr. 43,500 Cr.
Journal entry for 2015 29,600 Dr. 41,000 Cr. 41,900 Dr. 30,500 Cr.
Accumulated OCI, Dec. 31, 2014 0
Kieso, IFRS, 2/e, Solutions Manual
Balance, Dec. 31, 2015 41,900 Dr. 150,500 Cr. 399,500 Cr. 249,000 Dr.
(b) 2015
Pension Expense ................................................................................ 29,600
Other Comprehensive Income (G/L) ................................................. 41,900
Cash.......................................................................................... 41,000
Pension Asset/Liability ........................................................... 30,500
(c) 1. Discount Rate: $26,000 ÷ $325,000 = 8% based on interest expense or $16,400 ÷ $205,000 = 8%, based on
interest revenue.
(For Instructor Use On
55
2/e, Solutions Manual
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
PROBLEM 20-11
KRAMER COMPANY
(For Instructor Use Only)
56
20-
PROBLEM 20-11 (Continued)
Worksheet computations:
(b) 2016
Pension Expense ......................................................... 71,040
Pension Asset/Liability ........................................ 7,960
Other Comprehensive Income (G/L) ................... 12,080
Cash ...................................................................... 51,000
57
2/e, Solutions Manual
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
CHEN CORP.
Pension Worksheet—2016
General Journal Entries Memo Record
(For Instructor Use Only)
Annual Defined
Pension OCI— Pension Benefit Plan
Expense Cash Gain/Loss Asset/Liability Obligation Assets
PROBLEM 20-12
Balance, Jan. 1, 2016 70,000 Cr. 340,000 Cr. 270,000 Dr.
Service cost 45,000 Dr. 45,000 Cr.
Kieso, IFRS,
58
20-
PROBLEM 20-12 (Continued)
(b) 2016
Pension Expense ...................................................... 49,900
Pension Asset/Liability ............................................ 23,200
Other Comprehensive Income (G/L) ................ 8,100
Cash ................................................................... 65,000
59
(a) HOLLENBECK FOODS INC.
2/e, Solutions Manual
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
PROBLEM 20-13
Asset loss** 5,000 Dr. 5,000 Cr.
Journal entry, for 2015 70,000 Dr. 65,000 Cr. 5,000 Dr. 10,000 Cr.
Accumulated OCI, Dec. 31, 2014 0
Balance, Dec. 31, 2015 5,000 Dr. 10,000 Cr. 246,000 Cr. 236,000 Dr.
Kieso, IFRS,
61
PROBLEM 20-14 (Continued)
2/e, Solutions Manual
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
62
20-
TIME AND PURPOSE OF CONCEPTS FOR ANALYSIS
(IFRS)
63
SOLUTIONS TO CONCEPTS FOR ANALYSIS
CA 20-1
(a) A private pension plan is an arrangement whereby a company undertakes to provide its retired
employees with benefits that can be determined or estimated in advance from the provisions of a
document or from the company’s practices.
In a contributory pension plan the employees bear part of the cost of the stated benefits whereas
in a noncontributory plan the employer bears the entire cost.
(b) The employer is the organization sponsoring the pension plan. The employer incurs the costs
and makes contributions to the pension fund. Accounting for the employer involves: (1) allocating
the cost of the pension plan to the proper accounting periods, (2) measuring the amount of
pension obligation resulting from the plan, and (3) disclosing the status and effects of the plan in
the financial statements.
The pension fund or plan is the entity which receives the contributions from the employer,
administers the pension assets, and makes the benefit payments to the pension recipients.
Accounting for the fund involves identifying receipts as contributions from the employer sponsor
and as income from fund investments and computing the amounts due to individual pension
recipients.
(c) 1. Relative to the pension fund the term “funded” refers to the relationship between pension
fund assets and the present value of expected future pension benefit payments; thus, the
pension fund may be fully funded or underfunded. Relative to the employer, the term
“funded” refers to the relationship of the contributions made by the employer to the pension
fund and the pension expense accrued by the employer; if the employer contributes
annually to the pension fund an amount equal to the pension expense, the employer is fully
funded.
2. Relative to the pension fund, the pension liability is an actuarial concept representing an
economic liability under the pension plan for future cash payments to retirees. From the
viewpoint of the employer, the pension liability is an accounting credit that results from an
excess of amounts expensed over amounts contributed (funded) to the pension fund.
(d) 1. The theoretical justification for accrual recognition of pension costs is based on the expense
recognition principle. Pension costs are incurred during the period over which an employee
renders services to the enterprise; these costs may be paid upon the employee’s
retirement, over a period of time after retirement, as incurred through funding or insurance
plans, or through some combination of any or all of these methods.
2. Although cash (pay-as-you-go) accounting is highly objective for the final determination of
actual pension costs, it provides no measurement of annual pension costs as they are
incurred. Accrual accounting provides greater objectivity in the annual measurement of
pension costs than does cash accounting if actuarial funding methods are applied to actuarial
valuations to determine the provision for pension costs. While cash accounting provides a
more precise determination of the final cost, accrual accounting provides a more objective
measure of the annual cost.
64
CA 20-1 (Continued)
(e) Terms and their definitions as they apply to accounting for pension plans follow:
1. Service cost is the actuarial present value of benefits attributed by the pension benefit formula
to employee service during that period. The service cost component is a portion of the
defined benefit obligation and is unaffected by the funded status of the plan.
2. Past service costs are the retroactive benefits granted in a plan amendment (or initiation).
Retroactive benefits are benefits granted in a plan amendment (or initiation) that are
attributed by the pension benefit formula to employee services rendered in periods prior to
the amendment.
3. Vested benefits are benefits that are not contingent on the employee continuing in the service
of the employer. In some plans the payment of the benefits will begin only when the
employee reaches the normal retirement date; in other plans the payment of the benefits
will begin when the employee retires (which may be before or after the normal retirement
date). The actuarially computed value of vested benefits represents the present value: (a) the
benefits expected to become payable to former employees who have retired, or who have
terminated service with vested rights, at the date of determination; and (b) the benefits
(based on service rendered prior to the date of determination) expected to become payable
at future dates to present employees, taking into account the probable time that employees
will retire.
CA 20-2
1. Pension asset/liability is the cumulative contributions in excess of accrued net pension expense.
This item is reported in the asset section of the statement of financial position and is reduced
when pension expense is greater than the contribution made to the fund during a period.
2. Pension asset/liability is the cumulative net pension expense accrued in excess of the employer’s
contributions. This item is reported in the liability section of the statement of financial position and
is increased when pension expense is greater than the contribution made to the fund.
3. Asset loss as a component of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income arises when the actual
return on plan assets is less than interest revenue (beginning fair value of assets x discount rate).
This account should be reported in the equity section as a component of accumulated other
comprehensive income. In addition, it should be shown as part of other comprehensive income.
4. Pension expense is the amount recognized in an employer’s financial statements as the expense
for a pension plan for the period. Components of pension expense are service cost and net
interest.
65
CA 20-3
(a) 1. The theoretical justification for accrual recognition of pension costs is based on the expense
recognition principle. Pension costs are incurred during the period over which an employee
renders services to the enterprise; these costs may be paid upon the employee’s
retirement, over a period of time after retirement, as incurred through funding or insurance
plans, or through some combination of any or all of these methods.
2. Although cash (pay-as-you-go) accounting is highly verifiable for the final determination of
actual pension costs, it provides no measurement of annual pension costs as they are
incurred. Accrual accounting provides move relevance in the annual measurement of
pension costs than does cash accounting but may result in less neutrality due to estimate.
(b) Terms and their definitions as they apply to accounting for pensions follow:
1. Fair value of pension assets, when based on a calculated value, is a moving average of
pension plan asset values over a period of time. Considerable flexibility is permitted in
computing this amount. In many cases, companies will undoubtedly use the actuarial asset
value employed by the actuary as their fair value of pension assets for purposes of
applying this concept to pension reporting.
2. The defined benefit obligation is the present value of vested and nonvested employee
benefits accrued to date based on employees’ future salary levels. This is the pension
liability adopted by the IASB in IAS 19.
(c) The following disclosures about a company’s pension plans should be made in financial
statements or their notes (see Illustration 20-25)
66
CA 20-3 (Continued)
Information on how the defined benefit plan may affect the amount, timing, and
uncertainty of future cash flows
(1) Sensitivity analysis for each significant actuarial assumption, showing how the defined
benefit obligation would have been affected by changes in the relevant actuarial assumption
that were reasonably possible at the reporting date.
(2) Methods and assumptions used in preparing the sensitivity analyses required by (1) and the
limitations of those methods.
(3) Changes from the previous period in the methods and assumptions used in preparing the
sensitivity analyses and the reasons for such changes.
(4) Description of any funding arrangements and funding policy that affect future contributions.
(5) Expected contributions to the plan for the next annual reporting period.
(6) Information about the maturity profile of the defined benefit obligation, including information
about the distribution of the timing of benefit payments, such as a maturity analysis of the
benefit payments.
CA 20-4
(a) Pension benefits are part of the compensation received by employees for their services. The
actual payment of these benefits is deferred until after retirement. The pension expense
measures this compensation and consists of the following two elements:
1. The service cost component is the present value of the benefits earned by the employees
during the current period.
2. Net interest – Since a pension represents a deferred compensation agreement, a liability is
created when the plan is adopted. The interest cost component is the increase in that
liability, the defined benefit obligation, due to the passage of time, net of interest revenue
accrued on the assets, using the same discount rate.
(b) The major similarity between the vested benefit obligation and the defined benefit obligation is
that they both represent the present value of the benefit attributed by the pension benefit formula
to employee service rendered prior to a specific date. All things being equal, when an employee
is about to retire, the vested benefit obligation will be equal to the defined benefit obligation.
The major difference between the vested benefit obligation and the defined benefit obligation is
that the former is based on current salary levels and the latter is based on vested and unvested
amounts and estimated future salary levels. Assuming salary increases over time, the defined
benefit obligation should be higher than the vested benefit obligation.
(c) (1) Pension gains and losses, sometimes called remeasurements, result from changes in the
value of the defined benefit obligation or the fair value of the plan assets. These changes
arise from the deviations between the estimated conditions and the actual experience, and
from changes in assumptions. The volatility of these gains and losses may reflect an
unavoidable inability to predict compensation levels, length of employee service, mortality,
retirement ages, and other relevant events accurately for a period, or several periods.
Therefore, recognizing the gains or losses on the income statement may result in volatility
that does not reflect actual changes in the funded status of the plan in that period.
(2) These remeasurements are recognized in other comprehensive income. They accumulate
there and are not recycled into net income in subsequent periods.
67
CA 20-5
1. This situation can exist because companies vary as to whether they are using an implicit or ex-
plicit set of assumptions when interest rates are disclosed. In the implicit approach, two or more
assumptions do not individually represent the best estimate of the plan’s future experience with
respect to these assumptions, but the aggregate effect of their combined use is presumed to be
approximately the same as that of an explicit approach. In the explicit approach, each significant
assumption reflecting the best estimate of the plan’s future experience solely with respect to that
assumption must be stated. As a result, some companies are presently using an implicit approach,
others an explicit approach. IAS 19 requires the use of explicit assumptions. As a result, this large
variance in interest rates will probably disappear to some extent. However, it should be noted that
companies will have some leeway in establishing discount rates.
2. This situation will occur because of the pension liability required to be reported. That is, companies
are required to report as a liability the excess of their defined benefit obligation over the fair value
of plan assets. In the past, the basic liability companies reported was the excess of the amount
expensed over the amount funded.
4. These gross pension plan assets are not reported on the employer’s books. However, the fair
value of plan assets are required to be reported in the footnote, so that a reader of the financial
statements can determine the funded status of the plan.
5. (a) In a defined contribution plan, the amount contributed is the amount expensed. No significant
reporting problems exist here. On the other hand, defined benefit plans involve many difficult
reporting issues which may lead to additional expense and liability recognition.
Significant amendments will generally increase past service cost which are included in
pension expense in the year of the amendment.
(b) Plan participants are of importance, because the expected future years of service com-
putation can have an impact on the total defined benefit obligation.
(c) If the plan is underfunded, pension expense will generally increase (all other factors
constant). If the plan is overfunded, pension expense will generally decrease (all other
factors constant). The reason is that the expected return on plan assets will be less if the
plan is underfunded and vice versa.
(d) If the company is using an actuarial funding method different than the one prescribed
in IAS 19 (straight-line approach), some changes in the computation of pension expense
will occur for the company.
68
CA 20-6
While Selma may be correct in assuming that the termination of non-vested employees would decrease
its pension-related liabilities and associated expenses, she is callous to suggest that firing employees is
a reasonable approach to correcting the underfunding of College Electronix’s pension plan. Arbitrarily
dismissing productive employees on the basis of being vested or not vested in the pension plan in order
to avoid capitalizing a liability and recognizing expenses is a capricious and unsound business decision.
Richard Nye should discuss the ethical, legal, and financial implications of the alternatives available as
well as the accounting requirements relating to this situation. This obligation and its effect on the financial
statements should have been known to Cardinal Technology when it performed its due diligence audit of
CE at the time of merger negotiations. Cardinal Technology should capitalize the pension obligations of
CE as required by IFRS.
69
FINANCIAL REPORTING PROBLEM
(d) M&S’s Analysis of assets and expected rates of return portion of its
pension footnote details the major categories of assets, which are
property partnership interest; UK equities; overseas equities; govern-
ment bonds; interest rate swaps; corporate bonds; and cash and
other. In general, the expected long-term rate of return on these
assets increases with an increase in risk for the asset. M&S’s overall
expected rate of return is 4.4%.
Note to instructors: The amendments to IAS 19 have not yet been applied
by M&S at year end 2013.
70
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS CASE
adidas
Discount rate 3.5%
Expected pension increases 2.1%
Expected rate of salary increase 3.2%
Expected return on plan assets 4%
Puma
Discount rate 3.7%
Expected on assets return 4.51%
Future salary increases 3.59%
Future pension increases 2.05%
71
INTERNATIONAL REPORTING CASE
(a) One difference that students might note are the relatively high
discount rate and expected return assumptions used by this U.S.
company. For example, many U.S. companies use rates up to three
times as high as the rates used by international companies. Asset and
liability gains and losses are amortized as are past service costs under
U.S. GAAP. Under IFRS, asset gains and losses are reported as part of
comprehensive income and past service costs are recognized as part
of pension expense as incurred.
It should be noted that there are several similarities. Under U.S. GAAP,
the pension obligation is measured based on the projected (defined)
benefit obligation and the amount recognized is based on an amount
net of the liability and plan assets. Other than as discussed in the
preceding paragraph, the components of pension expense are similar.
(c) As indicated above, income and equity likely will be lower due to
higher pension expense and lower net income. If there are significant
asset gains (which is possible given the low expected return
assumptions), then income could be higher as the gains are amortized
into income more quickly. The lower discount rate used to measure the
pension obligation will result in lower interest cost in income, but gives
a higher measure of the projected (defined) benefit obligation.
72
76
20-
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Annual
Pension Defined Benefit
Expense Cash OCI - Gain/Loss Pension Asset/Liability Obligation Plan Assets
Balance, January 1, 2015 102.00 Cr. 820.50 Cr. 718.50 Dr.
Service cost 42.00 Dr. 42.00 Cr.
Kieso, IFRS, 2/e, Solutions Manual
73
ACCOUNTING, ANALYSIS, AND PRINCIPLES (Continued)
Journal entry:
PENCOMP, INC.
Income Statement for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015
Revenues:
Sales ............................................................................ €3,000.00
Expenses:
Cost of goods sold .................................................... €2,000.00
Salary expense........................................................... 700.00
Pension expense ....................................................... 52.20
Depreciation expense ............................................... 80.00
Interest expense ........................................................ 100.00
Total expenses and losses ............................. 2,932.20
Net income ................................................................. € 67.80
74
ACCOUNTING, ANALYSIS, AND PRINCIPLES (Continued)
PENCOMP, INC.
Statement of Financial Position
at December 31, 2015
Assets:
Inventory.......................................................................... 1,800.00
Cash ................................................................................. 368.00
2,168.00
Total Assets ...................................................... €3,848.00
Equity:
Liabilities:
75
ACCOUNTING, ANALYSIS, AND PRINCIPLES (Continued)
ANALYSIS
In this example, only the loss on plan assets ‘skipped’ the income
statement and went to other comprehensive income. Had this item been
included in income, ROE would have been = (€67.80 – €11.25) ÷ €2,752.55 =
2.05% (a half % lower). Whether this ‘should’ be included in a return on
equity calculation is debatable. The rationale for excluding this from
current period income (and therefore from ROE) is that a defined benefit
pension plan is a long-term contract and so it is the long term expected
return on the plan’s assets that is relevant to measuring the cost of
sponsoring the plan. Some people believe that a particularly high or low
return in a given year is not indicative of the long-term return. Others argue
that all returns, high or low, accrue to the plan sponsor and so pension
expense should reflect all returns.
PRINCIPLES
76
PROFESSIONAL RESEARCH
(a) According to IAS 19, (pars 127-130) 127 Remeasurements of the net defined benefit liability
(asset) comprise: (a) actuarial gains and losses (see paragraphs 128 and 129);(b) the return on
plan assets (see paragraph 130), excluding amounts included in net interest on the net defined
benefit liability (asset) (see paragraph 125); and (c) any change in the effect of the asset ceiling,
excluding amounts included in net interest on the net defined benefit liability (asset) (see
paragraph 126).
128 Actuarial gains and losses result from increases or decreases in the present value of the
defined benefit obligation because of changes in actuarial assumptions and experience
adjustments. Causes of actuarial gains and losses include, for example: (a) unexpectedly high
or low rates of employee turnover, early retirement or mortality or of increases in salaries,
benefits (if the formal or constructive terms of a plan provide for inflationary benefit increases) or
medical costs;
129 Actuarial gains and losses do not include changes in the present value of the defined
benefit obligation because of the introduction, amendment, curtailment or settlement of the
defined benefit plan, or changes to the benefits payable under the defined benefit plan. Such
changes result in past service cost or gains or losses on settlement.
130 In determining the return on plan assets, an entity deducts the costs of managing the plan
assets and any tax payable by the plan itself, other than tax included in the actuarial
assumptions used to measure the defined benefit obligation (paragraph 76). Other
administration costs are not deducted from the return on plan assets.
According to par. 122: Remeasurements of the net defined benefit liability (asset) recognized in
other comprehensive income shall not be reclassified to profit or loss in a subsequent period.
However, the entity may transfer those amounts recognised in other comprehensive income
within equity.
(b) The IASB made the following points in it basis for conclusion for amendments to IAS 19 (pars
BC99 – BC99):
BC90 The Board confirmed the proposal made in the 2010 ED that an entity should recognize
remeasurements in other comprehensive income. The Board acknowledged that the Conceptual
Framework and IAS 1 do not describe a principle that would identify the items an entity should
recognise in other comprehensive income rather than in profit or loss. However, the Board
concluded that the most informative way to disaggregate the components of defined benefit cost
with different predictive values is to recognise the remeasurements component in other
comprehensive income.
BC95 However, most respondents to the 2010 ED expressed the view that it would be
inappropriate to recognise in profit or loss short-term fluctuations in an item that is long-term in
nature. The Board concluded that in the light of the improved presentation of items of other
comprehensive income in its amendment to IAS 1 issued in June 2011, the most informative
way to disaggregate the components of defined benefit cost with different predictive values is to
recognise the remeasurement component in other comprehensive income.
77
PROFESSIONAL RESEARCH (Continued)
With respect to recycling these amounts into net income in subsequent periods:
BC99 Both before and after the amendments made in 2011, IAS 19 prohibits subsequent
reclassification of remeasurements from other comprehensive income to profit or loss. The
Board prohibited such reclassification because:
(a) there is no consistent policy on reclassification to profit or loss in IFRSs, and it would
have been premature to address this matter in the context of the amendments made to
IAS 19 in 2011.
(b) it is difficult to identify a suitable basis to determine the timing and amount of such
reclassifications.
63 An entity shall recognise the net defined benefit liability (asset) in the statement of financial
position.
64 When an entity has a surplus in a defined benefit plan, it shall measure the net defined
benefit asset at the lower of: (a) the surplus in the defined benefit plan; and (b) the asset ceiling,
determined using the discount rate specified in paragraph 83.
65 A net defined benefit asset may arise where a defined benefit plan has been overfunded or
where actuarial gains have arisen. An entity recognises a net defined benefit asset in such
cases because:
(a) the entity controls a resource, which is the ability to use the surplus to generate future
benefits;
(b) that control is a result of past events (contributions paid by the entity and service
rendered by the employee); and
(c) future economic benefits are available to the entity in the form of a reduction in future
contributions or a cash refund, either directly to the entity or indirectly to another plan in
deficit. The asset ceiling is the present value of those future benefits.
78
82
20-
PROFESSIONAL SIMULATION
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
J2 ∗ G3
G3 – H3
Measurement J2 ∗ H3
(a)
A B C D E F G H I J
1 Memo Discount
General Journal Entries Record Rate
2
Annual Defined
Pension Pension Benefit Plan
Expense Cash OCI - Gain/Loss Asset/Liability Obligation Assets 9.00%
3 Balance,
January 1,
Kieso, IFRS, 2/e, Solutions Manual
79
PROFESSIONAL SIMULATION (Continued)
(b) Simply change the discount rate in J2 to .07.
Journal Entry
OCI – G/L ........................................................................... 62,200
Pension Expense .............................................................. 103,050
Pension Asset/Liability ............................................ 66,250
Cash ........................................................................... 99,000
Disclosure
80