First, Section 7 of RA No. 9282 Explicitly Enumerates The Scope of The CTA's Jurisdiction Over

NATIONAL POWER CORPORATION vs.
MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT OF NAVOTAS

GR No. 192300 November 24, 2014
FACTS: Petitioner National Power Corporation (NPC) entered into a Build-Operate-and-Transfer

Project Agreements (BOTs) with Mirant Navotas I Corporation (MNC-I) and Mirant Navotas II
Corporation (MNC-II). The BOTs are for the construction, operation and eventual transfer to
petitioner of MNC-I and MNC-II’s certain gas turbine power stations. Petitioner has the
obligation to pay for all taxes, except business taxes, relative to the implementation of the
agreements.
For the 1st quarter of 2003, petitioner paid respondent Municipality of Navotas real property
taxes but stopped paying thereafter claiming exemption from payment thereon pursuant to
Section 234(c) of the Local Government Code (LGC). On 25 May 2005, respondent Municipal
Treasurer Manuel Enriquez notified MNC-I and MNC-II of their real property tax delinquencies.
On 21 Nov 2005, a Warrant of Levy was received from respondent Municipal Treasurer.
Consequently, petitioner filed before the RTC a Petition for Declaratory Relief, Annulment of
Notice of Delinquency, Warrant of Levy, and Notice of Sale with prayer for the issuance of a
Writ of Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order (TRO). The application for the
issuance of a TRO having been denied, respondents proceeded with the public auction.
Petitioner sought the declaration of the same as null and void.
In denying the petition, the RTC ruled that although Section 234 of the LGC exempts petitioner
from payment of real property tax due on the subject properties, failure to exhaust
administrative remedies resulted in the finality of the assessment. A Petition for Review was
thus filed by petitioner in the Court of Tax Appeals (CTA) and was raffled to its Second Division.
The Second Division dismissed the Petition. Petitioner filed a petition before the CTA En Banc
which affirmed the decision of the Second Division.
ISSUE: WON the CTA Second Division has jurisdiction to review the decision of the RTC which
concerns a petition for declaratory relief involving real property taxes.
RULING: Yes.
First, Section 7 of RA No. 9282 explicitly enumerates the scope of the CTA’s jurisdiction over
decisions, orders or resolutions of the RTC in local tax cases:
“Sec. 7. Jurisdiction. - The CTA shall exercise:

(a) Exclusive appellate jurisdiction to review by appeal, xxx:
Xxx
3. Decisions, orders or resolutions of the Regional Trial Court in local tax cases
originally decided or resolved by them in the exercise of their original or appellate
jurisdiction”
Indeed, the CTA, sitting as Division, has jurisdiction to review by appeal the decisions, rulings
and resolutions of the RTC over local tax cases, which includes real property taxes. The power
to impose real property tax is in line with the power vested in the local governments to create
their own revenue sources, within the limitations set forth by law.
The term “local taxes” in the aforementioned provision should be considered in its general and
comprehensive sense, which embraces real property tax assessments, in line with the precept
Generalia verba sunt generaliter inteligencia- what is generally spoken shall be generally
understood.
Second, when the legality or validity of the assessment is in question, and not its
reasonableness or correctness, appeals to the Local Board of Assessment Appeals (LBAA) and
subsequently to the Central Board of Assessment Appeals (CBAA) are not necessary.
Here, the claim of petitioner essentially questions the very authority and power of the
Municipal Assessor to impose the assessment and of the Municipal Treasurer to collect the real
property tax. It does not pertain to the correctness of the amounts assessed but attacks the
validity of the assessment of the taxes itself.
In fine, if a taxpayer is not satisfied with the decision of the CBAA or the RTC, as the case may
be, the taxpayer may file, within thirty (30) days from receipt of the assailed decision, a petition
for review with the CTA pursuant to Section 7(a) of RA 9282. In cases where the question
involves the amount of the tax or the correctness thereof, the appeal will be pursuant to
Section 7(a)(5) of RA 9282.
Petition is GRANTED and the decision of the CTA En Banc SET ASIDE.

First, Section 7 of RA No. 9282 Explicitly Enumerates The Scope of The CTA's Jurisdiction Over

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

First, Section 7 of RA No. 9282 Explicitly Enumerates The Scope of The CTA's Jurisdiction Over

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

First, Section 7 of RA No. 9282 Explicitly Enumerates The Scope of The CTA's Jurisdiction Over

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

NATIONAL POWER CORPORATION vs.

MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT OF NAVOTAS

FACTS: Petitioner National Power Corporation (NPC) entered into a Build-Operate-and-Transfer

“Sec. 7. Jurisdiction. - The CTA shall exercise:

You might also like