See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/233872130

Obesity and Oral Health - Is There an Association?

Article  in  Collegium antropologicum · September 2012

Source: PubMed

CITATIONS READS

15 129

3 authors:

Jelena Prpic Davor Kuiš

University of Rijeka University of Rijeka
15 PUBLICATIONS   87 CITATIONS    20 PUBLICATIONS   136 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Sonja Pezelj-Ribarić
University of Rijeka
43 PUBLICATIONS   570 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Jelena Prpic on 20 August 2014.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 Coll. Antropol. 36 (2012) 3: ???–???
Original scientific paper

Obesity and Oral Health – Is There an Association?

Jelena Prpi}, Davor Kui{ and Sonja Pezelj-Ribari}
University of Rijeka, School of Medicine, Department of Oral and Periodontal Diseases, School of Dentistry, Rijeka, Croatia

ABSTRACT

Obesity has been associated with several chronic diseases, such as coronary heart disease, stroke, adverse pregnancy
outcomes, diabetes, and mortality; however it has not been until recently that an increased body mass index (BMI) was
also related to dental health, especially periodontitis. We conducted a research to determine whether oral health was re-
lated to BMI using a cross-sectional design. Of 320 non-smoking subjects aged 31–60 years recruited from the patients
referred to Dental Clinic at the Clinical Hospital Center in Rijeka, Croatia, a detailed dental health status was completed
for 292 subjects. Measurements of weight and height, education level and frequency of toothbrushing were also recorded.
Dental index comprising information on caries, periodontitis, periapical lesions, and missing teeth was used as a mea-
sure of dental health. Dental index and education level both correlated significantly with BMI, however for the dental in-
dex this correlation was rather weak. The same could not be proven for the frequency of tooth brushing. Multivariate lin-
ear analysis showed that BMI was most dependent upon the number of missing teeth (88.6%), followed by the number of
carious lesions (8.3%). Persons with an increased BMI had slightly worse dental health, as represented by higher dental
index, regardless of their toothbrushing routines, and lower levels of education. Prevention programs should aim at ris-
ing both the general health awareness and improving oral health.

Key words: adults, dental health, diet, oral hygene, tooth loss

Introduction
Ever since the breakthrough study led by Mattila et tooth loss was analyzed, results were more uniform: it
al. in 19891, the scientific community has been intrigued could be concluded that the greater number of missing
by a possible association between oral conditions and sys- teeth and fewer occluding pairs of teeth meant increased
temic outcomes. Several diseases deserved attention: cor- body mass index (BMI), at least in free-living population
onary heart disease, stroke, adverse pregnancy outco- of people15,16. Very few studies were performed on possi-
mes, diabetes, but also mortality2. Commonly postulated ble relation between obesity and dental caries in adults8,17,
mediators included infection, chronic inflammation, and as well as obesity and overall dental health18,19. Again
genetic predisposition to both oral and systemic disease. conflicting results were obtained: obesity alone could not
Nutrition was also mentioned, but only as an alternative be used as predictor of dental decay, but nevertheless
mediator3. Several studies have established associations poor oral health was often found in obese persons.
between nutrient intake and systemic diseases, and ma- Relationship between oral health and obesity may go
ny of them proved that certain dietary patterns can re- two ways: oral infectious diseases (caries, periodontitis,
duce cardiovascular disease risk. Furthermore, it was periapical lesions such as granulomas and periapical ab-
proved that saturated fats may play role in increasing scesses) impact the functional ability to eat leading to
risk for breast and colorectal cancer4–6. changes in diet displacing nutrient-dense foods and fa-
However, studies addressing the possible association voring softer foods rich in sugars and saturated fats, fi-
of nutritional status and oral health yielded conflicting nally promoting conditions such as obesity20,21. On the
results. In studies where only periodontitis was studied other hand, obesity is often marked by an imbalanced
(as a component of oral health), some authors found in- diet rich in sugars which stimulate the growth of cario-
creased odds ratio of periodontal disease for obese sub- genic bacteria, such as lactobacilli and mutans strepto-
jects7–12, while in some studies the statistical significance cocci and favoring development of carious leasions.22
of such findings was limited to younger adults13,14. When Obesity has also been associated with an impaired im-

Received for publication March 1, 2010

1
J. Prpi} et al.: Obesity and Oral Health, Coll. Antropol. 36 (2012) 3: ???–???

mune response and increased risk for infectious diseases was non-smoking status for at least 5 years), presence of
such as periodontitis23. Therefore, we conducted this in- neoplasms, autoimmune diseases, pregnant women, and
vestigation to determine whether there were associa- chronic diseases which are known to be confounders for
tions between obesity (expressed through BMI) and over- periodontitis (such as coronary heart disease, diabetes,
all oral health (as represented by dental index) in a and cerebrovascular disease). Between September 2008
homogenous group of Eastern European non-smoking, and June 2009 a total of 320 patients of both genders
non-diabetic men and women aged 31–60 years. (mean age 48.9±11.4 years) were recruited. Total of 17
patients refused participation due to personal reasons.
Full clinical dental examination was completed for 292
Patients and Methods subjects, 159 women (54.5%) and 133 (45.5%) men – the
This study has been designed as a cross-sectional. remainder of the sample included persons who were ei-
Sample size was calculated for each analyzed factor (fre- ther edentulous or refused probing. Measurements of
quency of toothbrushing, education level, number of weight and height were performed using a hard ruler set
missing teeth and dental index) upon completion of a pi- vertically and secured with a stable base and a digital
lot study undertaken on a sample of 50 patients. It was scale, both certified by the Croatian State Office for
calculated that minimum 100 patients were necessary to Standardization and Metrology. Education level and fre-
form a representative sample. The study subjects were quency of toothbrushing were also recorded as part of
recruited from the patients who came consecutively to the questionnaire approved for this research by the Sci-
the Dental Clinic, Clinical Hospital Centre in Rijeka, entific Board of the Medical Faculty, University of Rijeka.
Croatia, which with its specialist care covers the area of The study protocol was independently reviewed and ap-
three Croatian counties (including both urban and rural proved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Medical
areas). Inclusion criteria applied were the age 31–60 Faculty, University of Rijeka and research has been con-
years, independent living status, willingness to partici- ducted in full accordance with ethical principles, in-
pate in the investigation, and possession of orthopanto- cluding the World Medical Association Declaration of
mogram not older than 3 months (no new orthopan- Helsinki (version VI, 2002). Subjects who agreed to par-
tomograms were taken solely for the study purposes, due ticipate signed an informed consent form, and at the con-
to risks posed by radiation). Exclusion criteria applied clusion of the study were provided with reports of their
were smoking (for previous smokers inclusion criterion oral status and significant findings.

Obesity
TABLE 1 BMI was used as an indicator of overweight/obesity; it
SCHEME FOR CALCULATING THE DENTAL INDEX USED
TO EVALUATE ORAL HEALTH
was computed from weight in kilograms divided by squa-
re height in meters, and divided into 4 categories, accord-
Type of disease Score ing to the WHO24: underweight (BMI£18.5 kg/m2), nor-
mal weight (BMI 18.5 to 24.9 kg/m2), overweight (BMI 25
Caries: to 29.9 kg/m2), and obese (BMI ³ 30 kg/m2). Two subjects
No carious lesions 0 were classified as underweight and these were excluded
1–3 Carious lesions 1 from the study.
4–7 Carious lesions 2
³8 Carious lesions or retained roots 3 Oral health status
In order to assess oral health status, every tooth was
Periodontitis:
inspected by a single examiner (JP) both clinically and
None 0 radiographically¸ using recent (<3 months) orthopan-
CAL £4 mm 1 tomograms, for the presence of carious lesions, severity
CAL 4–6 mm 2 of periodontitis, presence of periapical lesions, furcation
CAL >6 mm, periodontal abscess 3 involvement, pericoronitis, and periodontal abscess; the
number of missing teeth and retained roots was also re-
Number of periapical lesions:
corded. The arithmetic sum of the scores which ex-
None 0
plained the severity of dental disease formed the »dental
1 1 index«, based on previously published papers by Mattila
2 2 et al.25 and Janket et al.26 (Table 1).
³3 3

Tooth loss: Statistical analysis

None 0 Statistical analysis of data was performed by using
1–3 missing teeth 1 Statistica for Windows, release 8.1 (Stasoft, INC., Tulsa,
4–7 missing teeth 2 OK, USA). The data on dental index were presented as
³8 missing teeth 3 the mean ± standard deviation (SD). For these results we
used one-way analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) to
CAL – clinical attachment loss test the differences between groups according to category

2
 J. Prpi} et al.: Obesity and Oral Health, Coll. Antropol. 36 (2012) 3: ???–??

TABLE 2
BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS ACCORDING TO THE CATEGORY OF BMI (ONE-WAY ANOVA)

Normal Overweight Obese

Factor Statistic
BMI <25 BMI 25–30 BMI >30

Toothbrushing frequency N, (%)

Never 1 (1) 2 (1.4) 0 (0)
Once a day 16 (16.8) 18 (12.7) 12 (21.8) c2=1.22; p=0.544
Twice a day 51 (53.7) 81 (57) 25 (45.5) c2=30.1; p=0.001*
More than twice a day 27 (28.4) 41 (28.9) 18 (32.7) c2=9.37; p=0.009*

Education level N, (%)

Elementary school or no schooling 16 (16.8) 34 (23.9) 20 (36.4) c2=7.66; p=0.022*
High school diploma 53 (55.8) 74 (52.1) 32 (58.2) c2=16.64; p=0.028*
Baccalaureate 10 (10.5) 19 (13.4) 2 (3.6) c2=14.00; p=0.001*
College/university graduate,
16 (16.8) 15 (10.6) 1 (1.8) c2=13.18; p=0.001*
Master of science, or PhD
Dental index X±SD
16.0±10.3 18.2±8.1 19.4±9.6 F=2.77; p=0.064

*indicated significant difference between the groups according to category of BMI

of BMI. The analysis of the presence or degree of exam-

ined parameters was performed using Pearson c2-test.
The correlation analysis was expressed by Pearson corre-
lation coefficient for quantitative variables or Spearman
correlation coefficient for qualitative variables. Multiva-
riable analysis was performed using a linear regression
model.
All statistical values were considered significant at
the level set at p<0.05.

Results
In total, 292 subjects formed the basis for this investi-
gation. There were 96 subjects (32.8%) with normal
weight (BMI<25), 143 (49%) subjects who were over-
weight (BMI from 25 to 30), and 53 (18.1%) obese sub- Fig. 1. Correlation between dental index and BMI. Correlation
jects (BMI>30). Statistical data regarding BMI category, between dental index and category of BMI is positive and statisti-
and dental index and education level are presented in Ta- cally significant (r=0.134; p=0.026).
ble 2.
Both dental index and education level correlated sig- Since the results showed that dental index correlated
nificantly with BMI. However, the differences in mean significantly to BMI, we wondered which components of
dental index between persons with normal weight, those dental index were the greatest contributors to this corre-
who were overweight and persons who were obese, using lation. Multivariate linear regression showed that BMI
one-way ANOVA, were not statistically significant. Cor- was most dependent upon the number of missing teeth,
relation between dental index and BMI is presented in followed by the number of carious lesions and severity of
Figure 1. The value of Spearman rank coefficient of cor- periodontal disease. Contribution of the number of pe-
relation between education level and BMI was 0.203 riapical lesions was neglectable. The percent of contribu-
(p<0.005). tion of each examined factor is presented in Table 3.
Frequency of toothbrushing did not correlate signifi-
cantly with BMI. Obese subjects did not brush their
Discussion and Conclusion
teeth less; in fact, they were most likely to brush their
teeth more than twice a day. Value of Spearman rank co- The main finding of this study was that dental index
efficient of correlation between toothbrushing and BMI and education level correlated significantly with BMI
was 0.013 (p>0.005). among non-smoking older adults, regardless of their

3
J. Prpi} et al.: Obesity and Oral Health, Coll. Antropol. 36 (2012) 3: ???–???

TABLE 3
THE PERCENT OF CONTRIBUTION OF EXAMINED FACTORS ON DENTAL INDEX (MULTIVARIATE LINEAR REGRESSION)

The percent of
Factor c SEc p r
contribution
Caries 0.148 0.001 <0.001 0.576 8.3
Periodontitis 0.115 0.001 <0.001 –0.321 3.6
Number of missing teeth 0.918 0.001 <0.001 0.974 87.7
Total number of periapical lesions 0.072 0.001 <0.001 –0.057 0.4

toothbrushing routines. However, significant association tal index and Janket’s asymptotic dental score did not
between category of BMI and mean dental index could include only measures of caries visible upon oral exami-
not be proven, regardless of this significant, but weak nation, but also measures of periodontal disease and
correlation. This might be caused by the relatively large endo- dontic pathologies which required radiographic ex-
number of investigated subjects (when compared to cal- amination. These procedures gave us a more detailed in-
culated sample size). Of the examined dental index com- sight into overall oral health.
ponents, tooth loss was most strongly associated with It can be argued that poor oral health, and especially
BMI, followed by the number of carious lesions. These high number of missing teeth, leads to changes in nutri-
findings only partially agree with those from Sweden27 tion and may therefore contribute to weight change, de-
where the investigators found a significant relationship pending on age and population characteristics31. Oral
between age and tooth loss, but only in those aged 30–60 disease epidemiology is obviously very complex and co-
years. Linden et al.12 found that Northern Irish people -morbidity and socio-economic status may confound the
aged 60–70 years who were obese had fewer teeth, had nutrition-oral health association. In our and many other
spent fewer years in full-time education and had poorer studies it was proved that lower education level also
oral hygiene. In addition, Hilgert et al.16 proved that in means greater BMI. It can be argued that possible pre-
older Brazilian people (>60 years) edentulousness and vention and education programs should therefore target
dentition with 1–8 teeth were significantly associated this population, and measures to reduce obesity and
with obesity. Different conclusions were drawn from the treat oral infectious diseases should become a part of na-
investigation led by Sheiham et al. within the National tional health care programs, as advocated by the World
Diet and Nutrition Survey28; adults aged 65 years and Health Organization (www.who.int).
older without teeth were significantly more likely to be The strength of this investigation was selection of
underweight than those with 11 or more teeth. Further- study participants, who were all non-smokers, and previ-
more, dentate people with less than 21 natural teeth ous smokers had to comply with the criterion of non-
were 2 times more likely to be obese than those with -smoking status for more than 5 years.This study how-
21–32 teeth. Therefore the authors concluded that peo- ever has a drawback: this was a cross-sectional study
ple with more than 20 were more likely to have a normal which did not allow us to gain an insight into progression
BMI. of oral health – BMI relationship over time. Future in-
There are very few published investigations relating vestigations should be prospective longitudinal studies in
the number of carious lesions to obesity in adults29,30. non-smoking population with similar health awareness,
Tuomi17 concluded that obesity alone could not be used and measures of obesity should include not only BMI but
as a predictor of dental decay. If measures of overall oral also waist circumference.
health were used, our findings may be correlated with This investigation found that obese persons aged 31–
those by Griffin et al.18 who found that obesity was sig- -60 years had somewhat worse dental health, regardless
nificantly associated with self-reported poor oral health. of their toothbrushing routines, and lower levels of edu-
One of the investigations similar to our own was led re- cation. It is rather obvious that obesity alone can not be
cently by de Andrade et al. in Brazil19. The authors eval- used as the sole predictor of oral health, and that many
uated oral health using decayed-missing-filled teeth other factors, probably socio-economic in nature, may
(DMFT) index, where the missing component accounted play a more important role then just dietary habits32,33.
for 88.8% of the index, almost the same as in our investi- Whether oral conditions precede or follow weight change
gation (88.6%), but the correlation between the number will certainly remain an open question for quite a while;
of DMF teeth and BMI was not significant. NHANES III in addition, it is still impossible to discern whether there
study also used DMFT for analysis of possible relation- is a direct causal relationship between oral health and
ship between obesity and oral health. Important conclu- obesity, or this correlation is merely accidental. Never-
sion was that the number of DMFT increased more rap- theless, the present findings call for joint prevention pro-
idly with waist-to-hip ratios than with increasing BMI8. grams by both general and specialist health practitioners
Our decision to use dental index as a measure of oral on one side, and dental professionals on the other, aimed
health was based on previously published investigations at raising the general health awareness and improving
by Mattila et al.25 and Janket et al26. Mattila’s total den- oral health.

4
 J. Prpi} et al.: Obesity and Oral Health, Coll. Antropol. 36 (2012) 3: ???–??

REFERENCES
1. MATTILA KJ, NIEMINEN MS, VALTONEN VV, RASI VP, KESÄ- Epidemiol, 17 (1989) 289. — 18. GRIFFIN SO, BARKER LK, GRIFFIN
NIEMI YA, SYRJÄLÄ SL, JUNGELL PS, ISOLUOMA M, HIETANIEMI PM, CLEVELAND JL, KOHN W, J Am Dent Assoc, 140 (2009) 1266. —
K, JOKINEN MJ, HUTTUNEN JK, Br Med J, 298 (1989) 779. DOI: 10. 19. DE ANDRADE FB, DE FRANÇA CALDAS A JR, KITOKO PM,
1136/bmj.298.6676.779. — 2. JOSHIPURA KJ, RITCHIE CS, DOUG- Gerodontology, 26 (2009) 40. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-2358.2008.00220.x. —
LASS CW, Compendium, 21 (2000) 12. — 3. JOSHIPURA KJ, DOUG- 20. TOUGER-DECKER R, MOBLEY CC, J Am Diet Assoc, 107 (2007)
LASS CW, WILLETT WC, Ann Periodontol, 3 (1998) 175. DOI: 10. 1418. — 21. THOMPSON FE, MCNEEL TS, DOWLING EC, MIDTHU-
1902/annals.1998.3.1.175. — 4. LEE MM, LIN SS, Annu Rev Nutr, 20 NE D, MORRISSETTE M, ZERUTO CA, J Am Diet Assoc, 109 (2009)
(2000) 221. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.nutr.20.1.221. — 5. ZHANG X, 1376. DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2009.05.002. — 22. VÅGSTRAND KE, BIRK-
ZHANG B, LI X, WANG X, NAKAMA H, Eur J Med Res, 5 (2000) 451. — HED D, Nutr Rev, 65 (2007) 111. DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2007.
6. JOSHIPURA KJ, ASCHERIO A, MANSON JE, STAMPFER MJ, tb00288.x. — 23. MARTI A, MARCOS A, MARTINEZ JA, Obes Rev, 2
RIMM EB, SPEIZER FE, J Am Med Assoc, 282 (1999) 1233. DOI: 10. (2001) 131. DOI: 10.1046/j.1467-789x.2001.00025.x. — 24. World Health
1001/jama.282.13.1233. — 7. SAITO T, SHIMAZAKI Y, KOGA T, TSU- Organization. Obesity: Preventing and Managing the Global epidemic.
ZUKI M, OHSHIMA A. J Dent Res, 80 (2001) 1631. DOI: 10.1177/ WHO Obesity Technical Series 894. World Health Organization: Geneva,
00220345010800070701. — 8. WOOD N, JOHNSON RB, STRECKFUS 2000. — 25. MATTILA KJ, NIEMINEN MS, VALTONEN VV, RASI VP,
CF, J Clin Periodontol, 30 (2003) 321. — 9. NISHIDA N, TANAKA M, KESÄNIEMI YA, SYRJÄLÄ SL, JUNGELL PS, ISOLUOMA M, HIETA-
HAYASHI N, NAGATA H, TAKESHITA T, NAKAYAMA K, MORIMOTO NIEMI K, JOKINEN MJ, Br Med J, 298 (1989) 779. — 26. JANKET S-J,
K, SHIZUKUISHI S, J Periodontol, 76 (2005) 923. DOI: 10.1902/ QVARNSTRÖM M, MEURMAN JH, BAIRD AE, NUUTINEN P, JONES
jop.2005.76.6.923. — 10. SAITO T, SHIMAZAKI, Y, KIYOHARA Y, KATO JA, Circulation, 109 (2004) 1095. DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000118497.
I, KUBO M, IIDA M, YAMASHITA Y, J Periodontal Res, 40 (2005) 346. 44961.1E. — 27. OSTBERG AL, NYHOLM M, GULLBERG B, RÅSTAM
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.2005.00813.x. — 11. DALLA VECCHIA CF, L, LINDBLAD U, Scand J Public Health, 37 (2009) 427. DOI: 10.1177/
SUSIN C, ROSING CK, OPPERMAN, RV, ALBANDAR JM, J Perio- 1403494808099964. — 28. SHEIHAM A, STEELE JG, MARCENES W,
dontol, 76 (2005) 1721. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2005.76.10.1721. — 12. LIN- FINCH S, WALLS AW, Br Dent J, 192 (2002) 703. DOI: 10.1038/
DEN G, PATTERSON C, EVANS A, KEE F, J Clin Periodontol, 34 (2007) sj.bdj.4801461. — 29. KANTOVITZ KR, PASCON FM, RONTANI RM,
461. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01075.x. — 13. AL-ZAHRANI MS, GAVIÃO MB, Oral Health Prev Dent, 4 (2006) 137. — 30. MATHUS-
BISSADA NF, BORAWSKIT EA, J Periodontol, 74 (2003) 610. DOI: -VLIEGEN EMH, NIKKEL D, BRAND HS, Int Dent J, 57 (2007) 249. —
10.1902/jop.2003.74.5.610. — 14. ALABDULKARIM M, BISSADA N, 31. RITCHIE CS, JOSHIPURA K, HUNG H-C, DOUGLASS CW, Crit
AL-ZAHRANI M, FICARA A, SIEGEL B, J Int Acad Periodontol, 7 (2005) Rev Oral Biol Med, 13 (2002) 291. — 32. MILANOVI] SM, UHERNIK
34. — 15. SHEIHAM A, STEELE JG, MARCENES W, FINCH S, WALLS AI, FISTER K, MIHEL S, KOVAC A, IVANKOVI] D, Coll Antropol, 36
AWG, Gerodontology 16 (1999) 11. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-2358.1999. Suppl 1 (2012) 71. — 33. MILANOVI] SM, IVANKOVI] D, FISTER K,
00011.x. — 16. HILGERT JB, HUGO FN, DE SOUSA MLR, BOZZETTI POLJICANIN T, BRECI] P, VULETI] S, Coll Antropol, 36 Suppl 1
MC, Gerodontology, 26 (2008) 46. — 17. TUOMI T, Community Dent Oral (2012) 117.

autor

adresa
mail

PREKOMJERNA TJELESNA TE@INA I ZDRAVLJE USNE [UPLJINE – DA LI POSTOJI

POVEZANOST?

SA@ETAK

Dokazano je da je prekomjerna tjelesna te`ina povezana s nekoliko kroni~nih bolesti, kao {to su koronarna sr~ana
bolest, mo`dani udar, prerano ro|enje djece niske poro|ajne te`ine, {e}erna bolest, te smrtnost; ipak tek je nedavno
utvr|ena povezanost pove}anog indeksa tjelesne mase (ITM) i zubnog zdravlja, posebice parodontitisa. Proveli smo
presje~no istra`ivanje kako bismo utvrdili da li je stanje usne {upljine povezano s ITM. Od ukupno 320 nepu{a~a sta-
rosti 31–60 godina probranih iz skupine pacijenata upu}enih na Kliniku za stomatologiju Klini~kog bolni~kog centra u
Rijeci, Hrvatska, detaljni zubni status je u potpunosti zabilje`en kod 292 ispitanika. Tako|er su zabilje`eni podaci o
visini i te`ini, stupnju obrazovanja te u~estalosti ~etkanja zubi. Kao mjera zubnog zdravlja kori{ten je dentalni indeks
koji je sadr`avao podatke o rasprostranjenosti karijesa, parodontitisa, periapeksnih lezija te broja zubi koji nedostaju.
Dentalni indeks te stupanj obrazovanja su oba zna~ajno korelirali s ITM. U~estalost ~etkanja zubi nije bila statisti~ki
zna~ajno povezana s ITM. Multivarijantna linearna analiza je pokazala da je ITM najvi{e ovisio o broju zuba koji ne-
dostaju (88.6%), te broju karijesnih lezija (8.3%). Osobe s pove}anim ITM su imale ne{to lo{ije zubno zdravlje, izra`eno
dentalnim indeksom, bez obzira na ~etkanje zubi, te ni`i stupanj obrazovanja. Programi prevencije bi stoga trebali biti
usmjereni ka podizanju svijesti o op}em zdravlju kao i pobolj{anju zdravlja usne {upljine.

View publication stats