Unit BISY2001-ISY2001-ISY201 System Analysis and Design

Assessment Type Case Study Group

Assessment 3
Number
Assessment Essay 30%
Weighting
Alignment with Unit Learning Outcome Graduate Attributes Assessed
LO 1: Describe and discuss concepts and GA 1: Communication
Unit and Course principals of systems analysis and design. GA 4: Critical Thinking and Problem
LO 2: Examine the stages of the systems Solving
development life cycle. GA 6: Flexibility
LO 3: Apply basic diagrammatic modelling
tools to systems analysis and design.
LO 4: Use specifications such as user
interfaces, databases, and systems
interfaces to design systems to meet
specific business/project purposes.
Due Date/Time Week 10 – 29th May 2020 5:00 pm via Moodle

Assessment In this assessment, students must work in a group to prepare a case study analysis of a
systems development project.
Description You are required to form groups of Three to Four (3 to 4) students.
Your group is required to research and analyse a real life situation and prepare
a full analysis of a systems development project. Feel free to discuss your real
life situation project with your lecturer before engaging in any work. Suggested
topics below.
You may use www.creately.com, www.diagrams.net, MS Word, Visio or any other
modeling tool to create diagrams.

Your systems analysis and design project should include the following:
• Executive summary (max. 1/2 page). 2.5 Marks
• Introduction including description of the business, problem/opportunity identified
and goal and objectives of this project (max. 1 pages). 2 Marks
• Data gathering methodology and results (max. 1 pages). 2.5 Marks
• Existing system including current system overview, FDD, DFD, and Data
Dictionary. 6 Marks
• Proposed system including system overview, system requirements checklist,
DFD, Data Dictionary, Object relationship diagram, Use Cases, Class Diagram,
and Sequence Diagrams. 12 Marks
• Conclusions and recommendations (max. 1/2 page). 2.5 Marks
• Group reflection on Assessment 3 (max. 1/2 page). 2.5 Marks

Suggested topics (list is not restricted):

• Hotel Booking System
• Library Management System
• Car Rentals System
• Online enrolment System
 • Entertainment System ( movies , songs , Books and games )
• Online Shopping System
• Real Estate System
• Parking lot booking system
• Student information chat bot

Detailed • This assessment must be submitted by one student per group through the link
on Moodle page for this unit.
Submission • Include a cover sheet that has students’ name, subject, date, report title and
WORDCOUNT.
Requirements • The assignment should not exceed 1,200 words. Diagrams, charts and
Data Dictionary do not count towards wordcount.
Misconduct • Engaging someone else to write any part of your assessment for you is
classified as misconduct.
• To avoid being charged with Misconduct, students need to submit their own
work.
• Remember that this is a Turnitin assignment and plagiarism will be subject to
severe penalties.
• The AIH misconduct policy and procedure can be read on the AIH website
(https://aih.nsw.edu.au/about-us/policies-procedures/).

Late Submission • Late submission is not permitted, practical submission link will close after 1
hour.
Special • Students whose ability to submit or attend an assessment item is affected by
sickness, misadventure or other circumstances beyond their control, may be
consideration eligible for special consideration. No consideration is given when the condition
or event is unrelated to the student's performance in a component of the
assessment, or when it is considered not to be serious.
• Students applying for special consideration must submit the form within 3 days
of the due date of the assessment item or exam.
• The form can be obtained from the AIH website
(https://aih.nsw.edu.au/current-students/student-forms/) or on-campus at
Reception.
• The request form must be submitted to Student Services. Supporting evidence
should be attached. For further information please refer to the Student
Assessment Policy and associated Procedure available on
(https://aih.nsw.edu.au/about-us/policies-procedures/).
Marking Schema
Marking Criteria
Rubrics
HD D C P F

ULO 1: Describe Executive summary: Executive summary: Executive summary: Executive Executive
Reflects all of the Reflects the following Unclear and does not summary: summary:
and discuss following characteristics: reflect all of the Inaccurate and does Is not attempted or
concepts and characteristics: conciseness, following not reflect any of the quite unclear and
principals of conciseness, accuracy, and characteristics: following incomplete.
systems analysis accuracy, and objectivity with minor conciseness, characteristics:
objectivity. mistakes. accuracy, and conciseness, Introduction:
and design objectivity. accuracy, and Description of the
Introduction: Introduction: objectivity. business,
ULO 2: Examine Description of the Description of the Introduction: problem/opportunity
business, business, Description of the Introduction: identified and goal
the stages of the problem/opportunity problem/opportunity business, Description of the and objectives of
systems identified and goal identified and goal and problem/opportunity business, this project are not
development life and objectives of this objectives of this identified and goal and problem/opportunity attempted or quite
project are clear and project are somewhat objectives of this identified and goal unclear and
cycle
reflect a true work on unclear and reflect a project are unclear and objectives of this incomplete.
the project. good effort on the and do not reflect a project are
ULO 3: Apply project. true work on the inaccurate and do Data gathering
basic Data gathering project. not reflect any effort methodology and
methodology and Data gathering in the project. results:
diagrammatic results: methodology and Data gathering Are not attempted
modelling tools Clear and reflect a results: methodology and Data gathering or quite unclear and
to systems true work on the Somewhat unclear results: methodology and incomplete.
project. and reflect a good Somewhat unclear results:
analysis and effort on the project. and do not reflect a Inaccurate Existing System:
design Existing System: true work on the explanation and does System overview,
System overview, Existing System: project. not reflect any effort FDD, DFD, and
ULO 4: Use FDD, DFD, and Data System overview, in the project. Data Dictionary are
Dictionary are fully FDD, DFD, and Data Existing System: not attempted or
specifications correct. Dictionary are fully System overview, Existing System: incomplete.
such as user correct with minor FDD, DFD, and Data System overview,
interfaces, Proposed System: errors. Dictionary are partially FDD, DFD, and Data Proposed System:
System overview, correct with a few Dictionary are not System overview,
databases, and system requirements Proposed System: errors. accurate. system
systems checklist, DFD, Data System overview, requirements
interfaces to Dictionary, Object system requirements Proposed System: Proposed System: checklist, DFD,
relationship diagram, checklist, DFD, Data System overview, System overview, Data Dictionary,
design systems
Use Cases, Class Dictionary, Object system requirements system requirements Object relationship
to meet specific Diagram, and relationship diagram, checklist, DFD, Data checklist, DFD, Data diagram, Use
business/project Sequence Diagrams Use Cases, Class Dictionary, Object Dictionary, Object Cases, Class
purposes. are fully correct. Diagram, and relationship diagram, relationship diagram, Diagram, and
Sequence Diagrams Use Cases, Class Use Cases, Class Sequence
Conclusion and are fully correct with Diagram, and Diagram, and Diagrams are not
recommendations: minor errors. Sequence Diagrams Sequence Diagrams attempted or
Clear and reflect a are partially correct are inaccurate. incomplete.
true work on the Conclusion and with a few errors.
project. recommendations: Conclusion and Conclusion and
Somewhat unclear Conclusion and recommendations: recommendations:
Reflection: Genuine and reflect a good recommendations: Are no accurate. Are not accurate.
and accurate. effort on the project. Somewhat unclear
and reflect a good Reflection: Appears Reflection: Is not
Reflection: Genuine effort on the project. to be unauthentic attempted or
and accurate with and inaccurate. dishonest.
minor mistakes. Reflection: Appears
to be unauthentic and
partially accurate.

(25 - 30 marks) (22 – 25 marks) (19 - 22 marks) (15 - 19 marks) (0 - 15 marks)