Cement & Concrete Composites 37 (2013) 12–19

Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect

Cement & Concrete Composites

journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/cemconcomp

Long-term mechanical and durability properties of recycled aggregate

concrete prepared with the incorporation of fly ash
Shi-Cong Kou a,b, Chi-Sun Poon a,⇑
a
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, China
b
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Durability for Marine Civil Engineering, College of Civil Engineering, Shenzhen University, China

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t

Article history: This paper presents the findings of a long-term study on the mechanical and durability properties of con-
Received 10 November 2011 crete prepared with 0%, 50% and 100% recycled concrete aggregate that were cured in water or outdoor
Received in revised form 15 December 2012 exposure conditions for 10 years. The recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) was prepared by using 25%, 35%
Accepted 18 December 2012
and 55% class-F fly ash, as cement replacements. It was found that, after 10 years, the compressive
Available online 27 December 2012
strength and modulus of elasticity of the concrete prepared with 100% recycled concrete aggregate
was still lower than that of the control concrete. Over this period, the highest gain in compressive
Keywords:
strength and modulus of elasticity was recorded for the concrete mixture prepared with 55% fly ash.
Concrete
Fly ash
Fly ash improved the resistance to chloride ion penetration but it also increased the carbonation depth
Long-term properties of the concrete.
Recycled aggregates Ó 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction penetration, of RAC that were cured in water or outdoor exposure

conditions for 10 years were investigated.
The use of recycled aggregates (RAs) in structural concrete pro-
duction is still limited probably because of the limited knowledge
of the long-term and durability performance of recycled aggregate 2. Experimental details
concrete (RAC). Much data are available on the short to medium-
term (up to 90 days) mechanical properties of RAC [1–12]. The 2.1. Materials
use of recycled aggregate generally increases the drying shrinkage,
creep and water sorptivity and decreases the compressive strength 2.1.1. Binders
and modulus of elasticity of recycled aggregate concrete compared The cementitious materials used in this study were Portland ce-
to those of natural aggregate concrete [9–12]. It is known that ment (PC) equivalent to ASTM Type I, ASTM Class-F fly ash (FA) ob-
when using the same water to cement ratio, as RA percentages in- tained from a local coal-fired power plant. The chemical
crease, the mechanical properties of the RAC deteriorate. However, composition and physical properties of the cement and FA are
reducing the effective water–cement ratio in concrete production listed in Table 1.
or adding fly ash (FA) as a supplementary binder material can im-
prove the mechanical and durability properties such as compres- 2.1.2. Aggregates
sive and tensile splitting strength, modulus of elasticity, drying Natural and recycled aggregates were used as the coarse aggre-
shrinkage and resistance to chloride ion penetration of RAC pre- gate in the concrete mixtures. In this study, crushed granite was
pared with recycled concrete aggregate [13–15]. used as the natural aggregate. The recycled aggregate contained al-
There is a need to obtain more information on the long-term most entirely of crushed concrete rubbles obtained mainly from
properties of RAC, including RAC incorporating fly ash. This paper building demolition projects. To ascertain that the recycled aggre-
presents the long-term experimental results of the use of fly ash gate contained only crushed concrete, a hand picking step was also
as a cement replacement in proportion to the RAC. The effects of made to select crushed concrete lumps (>100 mm 100% old con-
fly ash on the long-term mechanical and durability properties, such crete) from the recycled aggregate obtained from the recycling
as compressive strength, tensile splitting strength, static modulus plant and they were further crushed in the laboratory using man-
of elasticity, carbonation depth and resistance to chloride ion ual and mechanical means. The nominal sizes of the natural and
recycled coarse aggregates were 20 and 10 mm and their particle
⇑ Corresponding author. Tel.: +86 852 2766 6024; fax: +86 852 2334 6389. size distributions conformed to the requirements of BS 882
E-mail address: [email protected] (C.-S. Poon). (1985). The physical and mechanical properties of the coarse

0958-9465/$ - see front matter Ó 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.12.011
 S.-C. Kou, C.-S. Poon / Cement & Concrete Composites 37 (2013) 12–19 13

Table 1 were cured in a water-curing tank at 27 ± 1 °C, and the other half
Chemical compositions of cement and fly ash. were placed under outdoor exposure conditions near the labora-
Contents Cement Fly ash tory until the ages of testing. The annual meteorological conditions
SiO2 21.0 56.79 in Hong Kong from 1999 to 2008 are listed in Table 4.
Al2O3 5.9 28.21
Fe2O3 3.4 5.31 2.4. Tests
CaO 64.7 <3
MgO 0.9 5.21
SO3 2.6 0.68
2.4.1. Compressive and tensile splitting strengths
Loss on ignition (%) 1.2 3.90 The compressive and splitting tensile strengths of concrete
Specific gravity (g/cm3) 3.15 2.31 were determined using a Denison compression machine with a
Specific surface area (cm2/g) 3520 3960 loading capacity of 3000 kN. The loading rates applied in the com-
pressive and splitting tensile tests were 200 kN/min and 57 kN/
min, respectively. The compressive and splitting tensile strengths
aggregate are shown in Table 2. The porosity of the aggregates was were measured at the ages of 28 days, 1 year, 3 years 5 years and
determined by using mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP). River 10 years.
sand was used as the fine aggregate in the concrete mixtures.
2.4.2. Static modulus of elasticity
2.2. Concrete mixtures The static modulus of elasticity of the concrete was determined
in accordance with ASTM C 469 (2002). This test was carried out on
Concrete mixtures with a target initial slump of 120 mm were the concrete specimens at the ages of 28 days, 1 year, 3 years,
prepared in the laboratory. The concrete mixtures were prepared 5 years and 10 years.
with a W/B ratio and cement content of 0.55 and 410 kg/m3 (con-
trol concrete) respectively. Fly ash was used as 0%, 25%, 35% and 2.4.3. Resistance to rapid chloride ion penetration
55% by weight replacements of cement and recycled aggregate This test was carried out on the outdoor exposed concrete spec-
was used as 0%, 50% and 100% by weight replacements of the nat- imens at the ages of 28 days, 1 year and 10 years. The ASTM 1202
ural coarse aggregate. The absolute volume method was adopted to rapid test method was employed to rank the chloride penetration
design the mix proportions of the concrete mixtures as shown in resistance of the concrete by applying a potential difference of
Table 3. In the concrete mixtures, the 10 and 20 mm coarse aggre- 60 V DC to measure the charge that had passed through the spec-
gates were used in a ratio of 1:2. imen. The tested concrete discs were slices of 51 mm thick, cut
from the middle portion of the initially prepared 100£  200 mm
2.3. Specimens casting and curing specimens.

For each concrete mixture, 100 mm cubes and 100£  200 mm 2.4.4. Carbonation depth
cylinders were cast. The cubes were used to determine the com- At the ages of 28 days, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years and 10 years, the
pressive strength and carbonation depth. The cylinders were used depth of carbonation of the outdoor exposed concrete specimens
to evaluate the tensile splitting strength, the static modulus of was determined by spraying the surface of a freshly broken con-
elasticity and resistance to chloride ion penetration. crete cube specimen with a solution of phenolphthalein [16–19].
All the specimens were cast in steel moulds and compacted In the non-carbonated part of the specimen where the concrete
using a vibrating table. After demoulding, half of the specimens was still highly alkaline, a purple–red colouration was observed,

Table 2
Properties of natural and recycled aggregates.

Type Nominal size Density Water absorption Strength – 10% fines value MIP porosity
(mm) (Mg/m3) (%) (kN) (%)
Crushed granite 10 2.62 1.12 159 1.62
20 2.62 1.11
Recycled aggregate 10 2.35 7.19 110 8.46
20 2.45 5.34

Table 3
Proportioning of the concrete mixtures.

Notation Fly ash (%) RA (%) Constituents (kg/m3) Actual slump (mm)
Water Cement Fly ash Sand Granite RA
R0 0 0 225 410 0 642 1048 0 150
R50 0 50 225 410 0 642 524 506 170
R100 0 100 225 410 0 642 0 1017 195
R0 F25 25 0 225 307.5 102.5 611 1048 0 165
R50F25 25 50 225 307.5 102.5 611 524 506 190
R100F25 25 100 225 307.5 102.5 611 0 1017 210
R0F35 35 0 225 266.5 143.5 598 1048 0 185
R50F35 35 50 225 266.5 143.5 598 524 506 225
R100F35 35 100 225 266.5 143.5 598 0 1017 250
R0F55 55 0 225 184.5 225.5 530 1048 0 190
R50F55 55 50 225 184.5 225.5 530 524 506 230
R100F55 55 100 225 184.5 225.5 530 0 1017 255
14 S.-C. Kou, C.-S. Poon / Cement & Concrete Composites 37 (2013) 12–19

Table 4
Annual values of meteorological elements of Hong Kong from 1999 to 2008. Source: Hong Kong observation

Year Air temperature Wet-bulb Dew Relative Pressure Rainfall Cloud

temperature point humidity amount
Mean maximum Mean Mean minimum Mean (°C) Mean (°C) Mean (%) Mean Total Mean (%)
(°C) (°C) (°C) (HPa) (mm)
1999 26.2 23.8 21.8 20.8 18.9 75 1011.9 2129.1 67
2000 25.5 23.3 21.5 20.7 19.1 78 1011.9 2752.3 69
2001 25.8 23.6 21.8 21.0 19.3 78 1012.2 3091.8 69
2002 26.0 23.9 22.1 21.4 19.9 79 1012.9 2490.0 70
2003 25.8 23.6 21.9 20.9 19.3 77 1013.2 1941.9 62
2004 25.6 23.4 21.7 20.6 19.0 77 1013.1 1738.6 62
2005 25.4 23.3 21.4 20.8 19.3 79 1013.0 3214.5 71
2006 25.8 23.5 21.7 21.2 19.8 80 1012.7 2627.8 70
2007 26.4 23.7 21.7 20.8 19.1 77 1012.8 1706.9 68
2008 25.8 23.1 21.1 20.3 18.5 77 1012.8 3066.2 67

Table 5. Each presented value is the average of three measure-

ments. It can be seen that at all the test ages the compressive
A1 A2 strength of the water cured RAC was lower than that of the NAC.
The compressive strength decreased with increase in recycled
C2 B1 aggregate content. At 28 days, The strength of the concretes was
Non- reduced by 12.6% and 21.6%, respectively, in comparison to the
Carbonated
strength of the control concrete. This is due to the recycled aggre-
Part
gates being more porous and weaker than the natural aggregate.
B2 However, the reduction decreased with increasing curing age. After
C1
10 years, the control concrete had a compressive strength of
67.5 MPa, whereas R50 and R100 had compressive strengths of
65.3 and 62.7 MPa, respectively with a reduction of 4.3% and
8.1%, respectively. Moreover, at all the tested ages, the compressive
A1 + A2 + B1 + B2 + C1 + C2
strength of the concrete exposed outdoors was lower than that of
D= the water cured concrete.
6 In general, the concrete incorporating fly ash underwent a
Fig. 1. Cross section of a concrete cube specimen after carbonation. reduction in early age compressive strength (for both NAC and
RAC). The compressive strength decreased with increase in fly
while in the carbonated part, the original grey concrete colour was ash content. At 28 days, the strength of the concrete mixture R0
observed. Each result reported is the average depth of carbonation with 25%, 35% and 55% of fly ash was reduced by 10.3%, 16.3%
‘D’ measured. The mean value of the depth of carbonation ‘D’ is and 25.5%, respectively, in comparison to the strength of the con-
shown schematically in Fig. 1. trol concrete without fly ash. Moreover, the compressive strength
of concrete mixture R100 with 25%, 35% and 55% of fly ash was re-
duced by 3.4%, 15.5% and 30.2%, respectively, in comparison to the
3. Results and discussion strength of the concrete without fly ash. The compressive strength
of both the natural and recycled aggregate concrete incorporating
3.1. Compressive strength fly ash with standard water curing significantly increased with cur-
ing age.
The results of the compressive strength of the concrete under After 1 year, the strength of the control concrete (R0), R50 and
both curing conditions at the ages of up to 10 years are shown in R100 increased by 6.7%, 7.8% and 9.9%, in comparison to the

Table 5
Compressive strength of the concrete mixtures.

Notation Fly ash (%) R A (%) Compressive strength (MPa)

28-day 1-year 3-year 5-year 10-year
Water Air Water Air Water Air Water Air Water Air
cured cured cured cured cured cured cured cured cured cured
R0 0 0 48.6 46.7 56.5 53.3 60.8 55.9 64.2 58.4 67.5 61.3
R50 0 50 42.5 41.3 51.2 47.1 55.6 50.6 61.4 55.1 65.3 57.5
R100 0 100 38.1 36.5 46.6 43.1 51.1 46.2 56.3 50.8 62.7 52.2
R0 F25 25 0 43.6 42.3 60.3 57.5 64.5 61.2 68.4 63.4 71.1 65.9
R50 F25 25 50 41.7 39.8 55.2 52.4 59.2 56.8 65.8 59.4 70.2 63.1
R100F25 25 100 36.8 35.2 51.2 47.6 55.3 52.6 60.3 55.5 68.5 59.1
R0 F35 35 0 40.7 38.9 50.3 46.6 61.2 55.9 66.5 59.8 69.2 63.4
R50 F35 35 50 37.1 35.9 47.6 42.3 57.2 51.1 62.3 56.7 67.5 58.8
R100F35 35 100 32.2 29.7 42.4 37.5 53.1 48.3 59.3 52.3 65.9 56.3
R0F55 55 0 36.2 34.9 48.6 41.2 57.6 52.2 62.3 55.1 67.1 60.4
R50F55 55 50 31.4 29.9 43.9 38.6 52.1 46.4 57.6 50.3 62.9 54.8
R100F55 55 100 26.6 25.6 35.1 32.5 43.9 41.1 50.8 45.8 55.6 49.4
 S.-C. Kou, C.-S. Poon / Cement & Concrete Composites 37 (2013) 12–19 15

strength of the corresponding concrete mixtures without fly ash. occurred in the first year. The concrete mixtures R100, R100F25,
The compressive strengths of the concrete mixtures with 35% R100F35 and R100F55 had strength gains of 64.6%, 86.1%, 104.7%
and 55% of fly ash were still lower than the corresponding concrete and 109%, respectively, between 28 days and 10 years, and 22.3%,
without fly ash. 39.1%, 31.1% and 32.0% of the gains, respectively, were in the first
After 3 years, the strength of the control concrete (R0), R50 and year.
R100 increased by 0.9%, 2.9% and 3.9%, in comparison to the The concrete mixture R100F55 had the highest compressive
strength of the corresponding concrete mixtures without fly ash. strength gain and this might be attributed to incorporating fly
The compressive strengths of the concrete mixtures with 55% of ash into the RAC. Due to the recycled aggregates being more por-
fly ash were still lower than the corresponding concrete without ous, some part of the cement and fly ash would be able to pene-
fly ash. trate into the aggregate, which subsequently would increase the
After 10 years, the strengths of the concrete mixtures with 25% bond strength between the aggregates and the hydrated cementi-
fly ash increased by 5.3%, 7.5% and 9.3%, respectively. Moreover, tious matrix. With the presence of fly ash, the cracks in the recy-
the strengths of the corresponding concrete mixtures with 35% cled aggregates were reduced due to the healing effect after a
fly ash increased by 2.5%, 3.4% and 5.1%, respectively. However, prolonged period of curing of the fly ash blended cement pastes.
the strengths of the concrete mixtures with 55% fly ash were still Therefore the concrete made with recycled concrete aggregate,
0.6%, 1.4% and 11.30%, respectively lower than the control and the quality of the interfacial transition zone, was better than
concrete. that of the old paste and natural aggregate concrete. The bond be-
Although the compressive strength of the concrete exposed out- tween the new cement paste and recycled concrete aggregate was
doors was lower than that of the corresponding concrete cured in enhanced.
water, similar trends of strength development were observed.
Fig. 2 shows the compressive strength gain of the concrete from 3.2. Splitting tensile strength
the 28th day to 1, 3, 5 and 10 years with standard water curing. The
highest percentage gain in compressive strength was recorded for The splitting tensile strengths of the concrete cured in water
the 55% fly ash RAC followed by 35% fly ash RAC, 25% fly ash RAC, and the outdoor environment at the ages up to 10 years are shown
RAC and the control concrete. The compressive strengths of the in Table 6. The results show that before 1 year the variation in
control concretes, R0F25, R0F35 and R0F55 increased by 38.9%, splitting tensile strength with recycled aggregate content was sim-
63.1%, 70.0% and 85.4%, respectively between 28 days and 10 years, ilar to that observed for compressive strength. The splitting tensile
and 16.3%, 38.3%, 23.6% and 34.3% of the increases, respectively, strength decreased with increase in recycled aggregate and fly ash
content. At 28 days, the splitting tensile strength of the control
mixture (R0) was higher 5.0% and 7.5%, respectively, than that of
the concrete mixtures R50 and R100 incorporating 50% and 100%
recycled aggregate.
However, comparing the results at 1 year and 10 years shows
that there was continuous and significant improvement in the
splitting tensile strength of RAC beyond the age of 1 year. At 1 year,
the splitting tensile strengths of the concrete mixtures with 100%
recycled aggregate were higher than that of the control mixtures.
Moreover, at all the test ages the splitting tensile strength of the
concrete mixture exposed outdoors was lower than that of the cor-
responding concrete mixture with standard water curing.
Fig. 3 shows the splitting tensile strength gain of the concrete
from 28 days to 1, 3, 5 and 10 years with standard water curing.
It can be seen that the splitting tensile strengths of the control con-
cretes, R0F25, R0F35 and R0F55 increased by 38.9%, 43.0%, 44.1%
and 39.8%, respectively, between 28 days and 10 years, and 3.9%,
Fig. 2. % Gain of compressive strength of concrete mixture with standard water 11.3%, 8.3% and 8.6% of the increase, respectively, occurred in the
curing.
first year. The concrete mixtures R100, R100F25, R100F35 and

Table 6
Tensile splitting strength of the concrete mixtures.

Notation Fly ash (%) RA (%) Tensile splitting strength (MPa)

28-day 1-year 3-year 5-year 10-year
Water Air cured Water Air cured Water Air cured Water Air cured Water Air cured
cured cured cured cured cured
R0 0 0 3.32 3.21 3.45 3.31 3.76 3.54 4.23 4.01 4.61 4.25
R50 0 50 3.16 3.09 3.51 3.41 3.92 3.62 4.41 4.14 4.71 4.32
R100 0 100 3.06 2.98 3.56 3.44 4.12 3.78 4.45 4.18 4.83 4.41
R0 F25 25 0 3.28 3.14 3.65 3.42 3.89 3.58 4.25 3.92 4.69 4.27
R50 F25 25 50 3.09 3.01 3.62 3.46 3.94 3.85 4.41 4.15 4.75 4.32
R100F25 25 100 2.96 2.91 3.75 3.54 4.12 3.91 4.40 4.21 4.81 4.49
R0 F35 35 0 2.90 2.81 3.14 3.02 3.36 3.18 3.68 3.42 4.18 3.77
R50 F35 35 50 2.78 2.72 3.24 3.11 3.38 3.21 3.72 3.53 4.24 3.88
R100F35 35 100 2.56 2.48 3.31 3.12 3.47 3.26 3.77 3.55 4.28 3.91
R0F55 55 0 2.66 2.58 2.89 2.73 3.04 2.91 3.22 3.01 3.72 3.30
F50F55 55 50 2.42 2.36 2.93 2.80 3.12 2.96 3.28 3.05 3.75 3.36
R100F55 55 100 2.23 2.19 3.01 2.89 3.24 3.11 3.41 3.14 3.81 3.48
16 S.-C. Kou, C.-S. Poon / Cement & Concrete Composites 37 (2013) 12–19

the Interfacial Transition Zone (ITZ) and increased the bond

strength between the new binder and the aggregates. According
to Maso [20] increasing the bond strength increases the concrete
strength and an increase in bond strength improves the tensile
strength more than the compressive strength.
Fig. 4 shows the relationship between the splitting tensile
strength and the compressive strength of the concrete before and
after 1 year. The results show that there are good correlations be-
tween the compressive strength and the splitting tensile strength
for the concrete mixtures before 1 year. However, after 1 year the
low correlation coefficient (0.36) obtained from regression analysis
indicates that the correlation between compressive strength and
splitting strength was poor due to fly ash and recycled aggregate
significantly improved the splitting tensile strength of the con-
crete. This further demonstrates the beneficial effect of using recy-
cled aggregates together with fly ash in concrete.
Fig. 3. % Gain of tensile splitting strength of concrete mixture with standard water
curing.

3.3. Static elastic modulus

R100F55 had strength gains of 57.8%, 62.5%, 67.2% and 70.9%,
respectively between 28 days and 10 years, and 16.3%, 26.7%, The test results of the modulus of elasticity of the concrete are
29.3% and 35.0% of the gains, respectively, were in the first year. shown in Table 7. The results indicate that use of large proportions
After 10 years, the concrete mixture R100F25 with 100% recy- of recycled aggregate reduced the modulus of the concrete com-
cled aggregate and 25% fly ash had the highest splitting tensile pared to that of the control mixture at the ages up to 10 years. At
strength (4.81 MPa), and the concrete mixture R100F55 with 28 days, the modulus of elasticity values of concrete mixtures
100% recycled aggregate and 55% fly ash had the highest strength R50 and R100 incorporating 50% and 100% recycled aggregate
gain (70.9%). This might also be due to the recycled aggregate con- was reduced by 12.6% and 25.2%, respectively, than that of the con-
crete incorporating fly ash having improved the microstructure of trol mixture. However, the 1-year and 10-year results indicated
that the modulus of elasticity values of the concrete mixtures with
recycled aggregate increased with age. Moreover, the modulus of
elasticity of the concrete decreased with increase in fly ash con-
tent. At all the test ages, the concrete mixture with 55% fly ash
had the lowest modulus of elasticity.
Fig. 5 shows the percentage gains in the modulus of elasticity of
the concrete from 28 days to 1, 3, 5 and 10 years with standard
water curing. The trend is: 55% fly ash RAC > 35% fly ash
RAC > 25% fly ash RAC > RAC and >control concrete. The concrete
mixtures R100, R100F25, R100F35 and R100F55 had gains of
31.3%, 33.9%, 40.7% and 46.1%, respectively, between 28 days and
10 years, and 7.2%, 7.9%, 11.2% and 14.8% of the gain, respectively,
was in the first year.
Fig. 6 shows the relationship between the modulus of elasticity
and the compressive strength of the concrete. The results show
that there are good correlations between the compressive strength
and the modulus of elasticity for all the concrete mixtures. Further-
Fig. 4. Relationship between tensile splitting strength and compressive strength of more, the ACI 318-08 equation for estimating the modulus of elas-
concrete.
ticity in terms of compressive strength of natural concrete is also

Table 7
Static elastic modulus of the concrete mixtures.

Notation Fly ash (%) RA (%) Static elastic modulus (GPa)

28-day 1-year 3-year 5-year 10-year
Water Air cured Water Air cured Water Air cured Water Air cured Water Air cured
cured cured cured cured cured
R0 0 0 30.1 29.5 32.1 30.9 33.6 32.4 35.8 34.3 37.6 35.1
R50 0 50 26.3 25.8 28.1 27.4 30.2 29.3 31.6 31.2 33.7 32.4
R100 0 100 22.5 21.6 24.1 22.8 25.4 24.9 27.8 26.3 29.5 27.4
R0 F25 25 0 29.1 28.5 31.3 29.8 33.9 32.1 35.2 34.1 37.0 36.5
R50 F25 25 50 27.7 27.1 30.2 28.6 31.1 30.0 34.2 32.0 36.1 35.3
R100F25 25 100 23.9 23.1 25.8 24.6 27.4 26.3 29.2 28.4 33.2 31.1
R0 F35 35 0 28.5 27.4 30.9 29.2 31.8 30.2 34.6 33.1 36.5 34.2
R50 F35 35 50 24.8 23.9 27.2 25.8 28.3 27.4 30.8 29.2 32.8 30.5
R100F35 35 100 21.6 20.7 24.0 22.6 26.7 26.5 28.6 27.3 30.4 28.1
R0F55 55 0 26.4 25.4 28.9 27.0 29.5 28.3 32.6 31.1 34.4 32.4
F50F55 55 50 22.1 21.3 24.8 23.6 26.3 25.4 28.7 27.5 31.5 29.6
R100F55 55 100 20.4 19.5 23.4 22.3 24.8 24.6 27.2 26.1 29.8 27.6
 S.-C. Kou, C.-S. Poon / Cement & Concrete Composites 37 (2013) 12–19 17

chloride ion penetration of both the natural and recycled aggregate

concrete at all test ages. The effectiveness of fly ash was further
demonstrated by comparing the results of R100 with that of
R100F25, R100R35 and R100F55, respectively (by 28.1%, 33.0%
and 43.1%, respectively). After 10 years, further reductions in total
charge passed were observed. The fact that the incorporation of fly
ash improves the resistance to chloride penetration of concrete has
been confirmed by many research studies [21,22]. This is due to
the reduction in the average pore size of the paste and the
improvement of the interfacial transition zone [21].
Fig. 8 shows the percentage reduction of total charge passed of
the outdoor exposed concrete from 28 days to 10 years. When
compared with the 28th day results, at 10 years the reduction in
the charge passed decreased with increase in fly ash content. The
concrete incorporating 55% of fly ash had the lowest reduction in
the charge passed. This might be due to the concrete mixture with
Fig. 5. % Gain of static elastic modulus of concrete mixture with standard water 55% fly ash having the lowest amount of residual calcium hydrox-
curing.
ide. The resistance to chloride ion penetration of concrete increases
when calcium hydroxide is carbonated to calcium carbonate. This
finding is consistent with the results of Chindaprasirt et al. [23]
who reported that exposure to carbon dioxide significantly de-
creases the chloride ion penetration resistance of mortars contain-
ing pozzolans.

3.5. Carbonation depth

The results of carbonation depth of the outdoor exposed con-

crete at the ages of up to 10 years are listed in Table 8. Fig. 9 shows

Fig. 6. Relationship between modulus of elasticity and compressive strength of

concrete.

plotted in Fig. 6. It is clear that the equation overestimates the

modulus of elasticity of all the test results.

3.4. Resistance to chloride ion penetration

The results (only for the outdoor exposed concrete) on the resis-
tance to chloride ion penetration at the ages up to 10 years are gi-
ven in Fig. 7. Recycled aggregate decreased the resistance to
chloride ion penetration of the concrete at all test ages. The incor-
poration of fly ash significantly increased the resistance to the Fig. 8. % Reduction of total charge passed in coulombs of outdoor exposed concrete.

Table 8
Carbonation depth of outdoor exposed concrete.

Notation Fly ash RA Carbonation depth (mm)

(%) (%)
28- 1- 3- 5- 10-
day year year year year
R0 0 0 3.22 5.03 6.13 8.21 12.09
R50 0 50 3.35 5.25 6.98 8.78 12.79
R100 0 100 3.48 5.58 7.68 9.46 13.36
R0 F25 25 0 3.42 5.32 7.18 9.33 13.61
R50 F25 25 50 3.53 5.64 7.86 9.82 14.43
R100F25 25 100 3.76 6.13 8.94 10.57 15.54
R0 F35 35 0 3.68 5.95 8.32 10.65 15.68
R50 F35 35 50 3.95 6.62 9.13 11.72 17.22
R100F35 35 100 4.15 7.12 10.68 13.75 18.37
R0F55 55 0 4.49 7.62 10.47 13.71 20.25
F50F55 55 50 4.74 8.23 11.36 15.35 22.64
R100F55 55 100 5.15 9.05 13.09 18.54 25.25
Fig. 7. Total charge passed in coulombs of outdoor exposed concrete.
18 S.-C. Kou, C.-S. Poon / Cement & Concrete Composites 37 (2013) 12–19

4. Compared to that of the control mixture, the use of large pro-

portions of recycled aggregate in concrete reduced the modulus
after 10 years of curing.
5. After 10 years of outdoor exposure, the resistance to chloride
ion penetration of recycled aggregate concrete was still lower
than that of the normal aggregate concrete. The concrete mix-
ture incorporating fly ash significantly improved the resistance
to chloride ion penetration.
6. The carbonation coefficient of concrete increased with recycled
aggregate content and fly ash content.
7. The study results suggest that the optimal mix proportions for
RAC mixtures are: 50% RA as a replacement of natural aggre-
gates and 25% FA as a replacement of OPC.

Acknowledgements

Fig. 9. Carbonation coefficient of concrete after 10 years outdoor exposure. The authors would like to thank Sun Hung Kei Properties Ltd.
and The Hong Kong Polytechnic University for funding support.

the carbonation coefficients calculated by using the formula: K = D/ References

t0.5 (mm/month0.5) after 10 years of exposure. It can be observed
[1] Oikonomou ND. Recycled concrete aggregates. Cem Concr Compos
that the use of recycled aggregate in concrete decreased the resis- 2005;27:315–8.
tance of concrete to carbonation at all test ages. This may be attrib- [2] Dhir RK, Jappy TG editor. Proceedings of the international conference on
uted to the recycled aggregate being more porous. This is exploiting wastes in concrete. Thomas Telford, UK. 1999.
[3] Hansen TC. RILEM REPORT 6, recycling of demolished concrete and
consistent with the results of Evangelista and de Brito [24] who masonry. Bodmin UK: E&FN Spon; 1996.
reported that the carbonation depth of concrete increased with [4] Collins RJ. The use of recycled aggregates in concrete, BRE information paper IP
increase in recycled fine aggregate replacement ratio. 5/94. Watford, UK: Building Research Establishment; 1994.
[5] Dhir RK, Henderson NA, Limbachiya MC editor. Proceedings of the
The results also show that incorporating fly ash increased the international conference on the use of recycled concrete aggregates, Thomas
carbonation depth and the carbonation depth increased with in- Telford, UK; 1998.
crease in fly ash content. This is largely attributed to the lower cal- [6] RILEM, Proceedings of the 1st ETNRecy.net/RILEM workshop on use of recycled
materials as aggregates in the construction industry, 11–12 September, 2000,
cium hydroxide content in the fly ash concrete. This is consistent Paris.
with the findings of other researchers [25–28]. After 10 years of [7] Sagoe-Crentsil KK, Brown T, Taylor AH. Performance of concrete made with
outdoor exposure, when compared with the concrete prepared commercially produced coarse recycled concrete aggregate. Cem Conr Res
2011;31:707–12.
without fly ash, at the fly ash content of 55%, the carbonation coef-
[8] Poon CS, Shui ZH, Lam L, Fok H, Kou SC. Influence of moisture states of natural
ficient was approximately 1.68 times for the natural aggregate and recycled aggregates on the properties of fresh and hardened concrete. Cem
concrete and 1.89 times for the recycled aggregate concrete. These Conr Res 2004;34:31–6.
findings are in agreement with the results of Khunthongkeaw et al. [9] Hasaba S, Kawamura M, KazuyukI T, Kunio T. Drying shrinkage and durability
of concrete made from recycled concrete aggregates. Trans Jpn Concr Inst,
[29] who reported that at a fly ash content of 50%, the carbonation Tokyo 1981;3:55–60.
coefficient was approximately 2–3 times as large as that of the OPC [10] Hansen TC, Begh E. Elasticity and drying shrinkage of recycled aggregate
only concrete mixture. concrete. J Am Concr Inst 1985;82(5):648–52.
[11] Olorunsogo FT, Padayachee N. Performance of recycled aggregate concrete
monitored by durability indexes. Cem Conc Res 2002;32:179–85.
4. Conclusion [12] Dhir RK, Limbachiya M, Leelawat CT. Suitability of recycled concrete aggregate
for use BS 5328 designated mixes. Proc Inst Civil Eng Build 1999;134:257–74.
[13] Kou SC, Poon CS, Chan D. Influence of fly ash as a cement replacement on the
In this paper, the effect of fly ash on the properties of 10-year- properties of recycled aggregate concrete. J Mater Civil Eng
old concrete made with recycled aggregate was investigated. Based 2007;19(9):709–17.
on the results and discussion, the following conclusions can be [14] Kou SC, Poon CS, Chan D. Influence of fly ash as a cement addition on the
properties of recycled aggregate concrete. Mater Struct 2008;41(7):1191–201.
drawn: [15] Costabile S. Recycled aggregate concrete with fly ash: A preliminary study on
the feasibility of a sustainable structural material. In: The first international
1. Due to pozzolanic reaction between fly ash and Ca(OH)2 in the conference on ecological building structure, San Rafael California, July, 2001. p.
5–9.
RAC, the long-term mechanical and durability properties of the [16] Ramezanianpour AA. Properties and durability of pozzolanic cement mortars
concrete were significantly improved. and concretes. PhD thesis. UK: Civil Engineering Department, The University of
2. After 10 years, the compressive strength of recycled aggregate Leeds; 1987.
[17] Claisse PA. The properties and performance of high strength silica fume
concrete was still lower than that of corresponding natural concrete. PhD thesis. UK: The University of Leeds; 1988.
aggregate concrete. However, the reduction in the strength [18] Paillere AM, Raverdy M, Grimaldi G. Carbonation of concrete with low-calcium
decreased with increase in curing age. The concrete mixture fly ash and granulated blast furnace slag: Influence of air-entraining agents
and freezing and thawing cycles. In: Proceedings of ACI Canmet second
with 100% recycled concrete aggregate had the highest strength international conference on fly ash, silica fume, slag and natural pozzolans in
gain of more than 60% between 28 days and 5 years. concrete, vol. SP-91.. Spain, Madrid; 1986. p. 541–62.
3. At 1 year, the splitting tensile strengths of the concrete mix- [19] Cengiz Duran A. Accelerated carbonation and testing of concrete made with fly
ash. Constr Build Mater 2003;17:147–52.
tures prepared with 100% recycled aggregate were higher than
[20] Maso JC. The bond between aggregates and hydrated cement paste. In: Proc.
that of the corresponding natural aggregate concrete. After 7th int. congress on the chemistry of cement, Editions Septima, Paris, I:VII 1/3–
5 years, the concrete mixture with 100% recycled concrete 1/15, 1980.
aggregate had the highest splitting tensile strength and [21] Chindaprasirt P, Chotithanorm C, Cao HT, Sirivivatnanon V. Influence of fly ash
fineness on the chloride penetration of concrete. Construct Build Mater
strength gain (from 16.3% to 45.4%). 2007;21:356–61.
 S.-C. Kou, C.-S. Poon / Cement & Concrete Composites 37 (2013) 12–19 19

[22] Gastaldini ALG, Isaia GC, Gomes NS, Sperb JEK. Chloride penetration and [26] Papadakis VG, Fardis MN, Vayenas CG. Hydration and carbonation of
carbonation in concrete with rice husk ash and chemical activators. Cem Concr pozzolanic cements. ACI Mater J 1992;89(2):119–29.
Compos 2007;21:356–61. [27] Uomoto T, Takada Y. Factors affecting concrete carbonation rate. Durability
[23] Chindaprasirt P, Rukzon S, Sirivivatnanon V. Effect of carbon dioxide on Build Mater Componen 1993;6:1133–41.
chloride penetration and chloride ion diffusion coefficient of blended Portland [28] Sulapha P, Wong SF, Wee TH, Swaddiwudhipong S. Carbonation of concrete
cement mortar. Construct Build Mater 2008;22(1701–170):7. containing mineral admixtures. J Mater Civil Eng 2003;15(2):134–43.
[24] Evangelista L, de Brito J. Durability performance of concrete made with fine [29] Khunthongkeaw J, Tangtermsirikul S, Leelawat T. A study on carbonation
recycled concrete aggregates. Cem Concr Compos 2010;32:9–14. depth prediction for fly ash concrete. Construct Build Mater 2006;20:744–53.
[25] Ho DWS, Lewis RK. Carbonation of concrete and its prediction. Cem Concr Res
1987;17:489–504.