Origins of Caste (ePGP) PDF
Origins of Caste (ePGP) PDF
Origins of Caste (ePGP) PDF
Development Team
Prof. Anup Kumar Kapoor
Principal Investigator
Department of Anthropology, University of Delhi
Module Id 33
1. Introduction
2. Characteristics of caste
INTRODUCTION
Various factors define the social stratification called caste which further defines the social hierarchy of
its individuals. This stratification mainly based on power, prestige etc. Caste structure is formed on The
basis of the birth of the individual. In the caste ideology the Brahminic model of Hindu Society faces a
problem of ‘life and death’ derived from the Indian thinking in terms of ‘purity and pollution’. The
purity of life is the absolute truth free from this world and beyond death in a state of mukti (salvation),
whereas impurity is related to death, human waste, dirt etc. in such thinking it is easy to understand
why most of the Hindus are against no-vegetarianism and the use of alcohol. Abstaining keeps them
away from any possible contact with death and impurity. This is the character of the caste theory,
whereas in practice, although ‘pure’ and impure’ are separated in order to protect life from death,
special caste specialists and groups are in fact formed, who charge themselves with impurity to free
others from pollution. It creates the hierarchical classification of the four main ‘verna’ and a number of
jatis or castes which are based on series of gradations of ritual and religious purity, high and low status,
and eating and drinking habits.
The root of English meaning of Jati or Caste comes from the word ‘Casta’ which in Portuguese means
breed, race or kind. Hindu system calls it Jati. The functional role of caste as a unit explains the status
of equal individuals; caste also acts as a system which maintains the characters of the very caste and its
members.
Caste has been perceived as a cultural concept which is based on certain ideas, beliefs and values.
Similarly caste from a structural point of view acts to maintain the status and roles of the involved
population.
Different social scientists have defined caste in various definition.
According to Herbert Risley caste is as “a collection of families bears a common name, claiming a
common descent from a mythical ancestor, human or divine, professing to follow the same hereditary
1. Segmentary Society:
It explains that small social groups called caste formulates the society. Further each of the social group
(castes) is socially well developed. The most important is the birth of an individual defines his or her
affiliation to a caste. That means the caste of the parents becomes the caste of the child. Such form of
affiliation is unalterable which defines the position of an individual in the society for his whole life.
Though the individual gets better in terms of various factors like, education, occupation etc, it does not
elevate his caste status leading to no possibility to social mobility.
But M. N. Srinivas, in his findings shows that an individual elevates himself in hierarchy in a couple of
generation after getting well education or economic prosperity.
2. Hierarchy:
The Indian caste system is a good explanation to social; hierarchy.
Social superiority and inferiority are defined as per Caste status. While Brahmins occupy the top
hierarchical position, Sudras are at the lower. Kshatriyas being in the second position in hierarchy
followed by Vaisyas formulate the total caste system in India. Though there are untouchables in the
society they do not formulate the Caste system. Most importantly, though the position and hierarchy is
clearly defined the happenings of social tension are not common. In this process religion and such
practices play a pivotal role.
4
4. Hereditary Status:
Caste hierarchy is affiliated to the membership of the individual to the caste and the membership is
defined by birth of the individual. So caste is a business of those who are born in their respective caste
groups.
5. Hereditary Occupation:
The caste system is conceived on the basis of occupation. Affiliated persons to a particular caste
practise an occupation which is already prescribed for that caste group. For example, Kshatriyas are
meant for rule and administration as well as protection of the society against outside attack. Similarly
Brahmins act as priests, barber, washer man do provides services.
7. Cultural Difference:
The caste hierarchy has defined the cultural practices among different castes by further defining, their
occupation, pattern of marriage, sanctity and holiness etc.; to be true to own religious status and
practices of own caste. So the living practices of different castes are different. As Prof. GS Ghurye
says, ‘caste is a small and complete world for the individual with differentiating from others’.
8. Social Segregation:
Defining differentiating aspects in caste with respect to Social segregation, Ghurye says-
“Segregation of individual castes or of groups of castes in village is most obvious mark of civil
privileges and disabilities, and it has prevailed in a more or less definite form all over India”.
It has been observed that the social segregation is more severe in southern India than northern India. In
traditional village societal system, it can be observed that the service castes as well as untouchables are
12. Taboo:
Practising Taboo is a social mechanism and prohibition that maintains the issues like good and bad in
the society. Though it is the biggest source of superstition,, it mainly aims to isolate the caste from rest
as per the restriction or prohibition, for example, to share space with Sudras or Untouchables.
There are many theories behind the formation of the caste system. But the exact and original one is is
unknown to everyone. Whatever it may be it can be said that
the caste system began in India. The origin of caste system is
often understood of starting after the Aryan invasion or after
the establishment of indo Aryan societal system.
Racial Theory:
Anthropologist Dr. D.N. Mazumdar gave the racial theory of
caste in India. As per him caste system started in India after
the Aryans entered.
In the hierarchy, Brahman and Kshatriya occupy the first two position. Similarly, in social hierarchy
these two groups were identified as priests-with knowledge, Rulers- the warriors. The other caste Vis
or Vaisya referred to common people while Sudras are the service providers. Though Rig Veda has
little mention about the caste hierarchy, but it is believed that Brahmins were conferred the top position
in the society.
Political Theory:
The political theory of caste is more convinced that Brahmans are the formulators of this whole caste
system and further moulding it as per their needs. They placed themselves at the top of the hierarchy.
Prof. GS Ghurye said, “Caste is a Brahminic child of Indo-Aryan culture cradled in the land of the
Ganges and thence transferred to other parts of India”.
This political theory says the caste hybridisation or the coming up of Caste Sankaras is illegitimate and
out groups in caste system. According to this theory, the Brahmans are identified as Dwijas. Along
with Brahmans Kshatriya and Sudras were also identified as Dwijas or twice burn castes. It was
defined that these three castes had went through the process of
rebirth while the Sudras are considered once born. Here it is worth
mentioning that the term jati henceforth started to define
substructure in Varna system though the word is simultaneously
used for Varna.
Occupational Theory:
The occupational theory defines caste in the line of social or societal function further leading to various
occupational groups being defined as caste or sub castes like, blacksmith, goldsmith, barber, washer
man etc. That means this theory defines the individual’s position and status in society based on his or
her work pattern as placed in societal hierarchy of superiority and inferiority. Newsfield in his
observation on caste said, “Function and function alone is responsible for the origin of caste structure
in India”.
Traditional Theory:
The traditional theory of caste system brings in the divine origin of caste system. It refers to the
formulation of caste system by the divine creator , Brahma in his process of creation of world and a
human society. Dr. DN Mazumdar says, “if, however we take the divine origin of the Varna as an
allegorical explanation of the functional division of society, the theory assumes practical significance”.
Further Denzil Ibetson defines caste as the customized forms of guilds. He opines that while tribes,
guilds and religion interacted with each other Caste came to the form. By adopting specific professions
in a fixed format, the tribes were transformed to guilds. Taking the queue from the priests, the tertiary
position in the society the other guilds started to practise similar practices like endogamy with giving
rise to a caste in a period of time.
Religious Theory:
The religious theory of caste is mainly advocated by Hocart and Senart. Hocart defined social
stratification as a result of religious principles and customs. He generalised that the predominant role of
religious prist and the kings with a godly figure played a pivotal role in formation of various functional
organelles in the society. Senart, taking the clue from religious prohibition, said the caste system
originated with particular local god who accepts a particular food as offerings. Believers of different
deities are parts of different groups.
Evolutionary Theory:
Evolutionally theory with the assumption of social evolution as the very process explains the caste
system is an outcome of long process of social evolutionary process rather than any other way.
This theory defines following factors as few influential ones in caste formulation process:
Understanding dominant caste is crucial to the understanding of rural social life in India. A caste may
be said to be ‘dominant’ when it preponderates numerically over other castes, and when it also wields
preponderant economic and political power. A large and powerful caste group can be more easily
dominant if its position in the local community is not too low. Occasionally a caste is dominant in a
group of neighbouring villages if not over a district or two, and in such cases, local dominance is
linked with regional dominance.
It is further not worthy that the Indian caste system is a social institution in itself than simply being a
Hindu practice. Most importantly, cast system is not a simple Indian concept it is also practised in
other parts of the world. The feudal medieval Europe also functioned like a caste based system.
These two theories are the latest and land mark theories in the process of explaining caste system. The
first theory i.e. theory of fission was
proposed by Iravati Karve that most
castes are tribe in origin. Like a tribe, a
caste is an extended kin group
traditionally spread over a definite
geographical region. And, as in a tribe,
members of a caste which used to be or
still is regulated by a caste which used to
be or still is regulated by a caste council.
Karve’s idea of caste system is that caste system is not an outcome of Aryan tradition rather it was
there in pre Aryan time. As Karve defined the caste as a caste cluster rather than caste like Brahmins is
a caste cluster along with sub castes as the castes. She further explained that castes in the caste clusters
could successfully elevated themselves to the same social rank through time and continued to maintain
their endogamous character. So she said these groups in a caste cluster can be culturally different
significantly along with without any genetically diffident.
10
11
12
Attitudinal Changes:
(i) Declining nature of belief in ascriptive status:
The socio economic liberalisation has broken the hereditary occupation based social status. It has
enabled the underprivileged to come to the mainstream and be a part of decision making process rather
than a doormat and powerless section of the society.
The traditional philosophical practices have got transformation with increased inclusiveness. The
philosophy that has formulated the caste system has been doubted and out rightly rejected by various
major groups. New philosophy that takes all people hand in hand with a liberal stand against strict
caste hierarchy has evolved.
13
14
15