Removal of Ammonia-Nitrogen (Conventional Activated-Sludge System To Meet New D.O.E Regulations

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

2011 International Conference on Environment and Industrial Innovation

IPCBEE vol.12 (2011) © (2011) IACSIT Press, Singapore

Removal of Ammonia-Nitrogen (NH3-N) and Nitrate ( ) by Modified


Conventional Activated-Sludge System to Meet New D.O.E Regulations

S.R.M. Kutty1, M.H. Isa1 and L.C. Leong 1 +


1
Civil Engineering Department of Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Bandar Seri Iskandar, 31750 Tronoh,
Perak, Malaysia.
Abstract. The recent amendment of the Environmental Quality (Sewage) Regulations 2009 has
significantly reduced the discharge limit of ammonia-nitrogen and nitrate in the domestic effluent discharge
from treatment plants. However, the conventional activated-sludge processes employed in the domestic
sewage treatment plants are not able to meet the new regulations, as nitrification is inhibited due to
insufficient solids retention time and sludge age of the biomass. Thus, the purpose of this study is to enhance
the conventional activated-sludge process through a modified, laboratory scale biological reactor. To achieve
this, a modified biological reactor with pre-installed continuous narrow baffle walls operating at extended
aeration (SRT = 40 days) was designed to intentionally create a number of complete-mix activated-sludge
zones. In addition, a pre-anoxic compartment was also provided prior to the aerobic chamber for
denitrification purpose. In order to compare the performance, a control reactor (SRT = 2 days) operating at
conventional aeration was created to simulate the conventional activated-sludge process in the domestic STP.
Synthetic wastewater was produced by using dissolved grinded cats food to imitate medium strength
domestic wastewater and to create more consistent organic loading. During the operation stage, biological
sludge was added into the reactors and 10 days of acclimatization period was set to stabilize the biomass, the
performance of the reactors was monitored for 10 days continuously until the readings were stabilized. By
comparison, both of the reactors managed to achieve above 80% of reduction for both COD and BOD value,
and above 75% of removal for total suspended solids (TSS). On the other hand, the modified reactor
significantly outperformed the control reactor by approximately 60% in the ammonia removal capacity. The
nitrification kinetic for control and modified reactor was determined to be 0.0823 and 10.321, respectively.
In addition, the proposed design also potentially eliminates the usages of mechanical mixers in the
conventional aeration basin.
Keywords: ammonia-nitrogen, solid retention time, modified conventional activated-sludge, baffled reactor

1. Introduction
Ammonia-nitrogen (NH ) is a constituent in raw domestic wastewater. However, the degradation of the
organic matter in the biological treatment stage also produce substantial amount of ammonia compounds.
Through the biological nitrification process, ammonia (NH ) is oxidized to nitrite (NO ), and nitrate (NO ),
by aerobic autotrophic bacteria. The final output of nitrification process, which is nitrate (NO ) could be
reduced to nitrogen gas (N ) through de-nitrification process under anoxic condition [1].
The sewage discharge from the domestic sewage treatment plant is typically subjected to the local, state
and federal regulations and standards. In December 2009, the Department of Environment (D.O.E) Malaysia
has revised the Environmental Quality (Sewage) Regulations 2009, which significantly reduced the discharge
limit of ammonia-nitrogen (NH ) from 50 mg/L to 5 mg/L. In addition, a new discharge limit was also set
for nitrate at 10 mg/L [2].
The solids retention time (SRT) is the most important design and operating parameter for the activated
sludge process as it represents the average period of time the biomass remains in the system before wasted.

+
Corresponding author. Tel.: +6 0172962947; fax: +6 05-3656716
E-mail address: [email protected]
103
SRT affects the treatment process performance, aeration tank volume, sludge production, and oxygen
requirements [1]. The minimum sludge age required to achieve 100% of nitrification is shown to be 16 days
through experimental work [3]. Typical design SRT values may range from 10 to 20 days at 10 ⁰C to 4 to 7
days at 20 ⁰C. Above 28 ⁰C, both ammonia and nitrite oxidation kinetics should be considered [4]. However,
for complete nitrification to take place and to stabilize the sludge, the sludge age recommended for extended
aeration should range from 20 to 40 days [1].
Nitrification is affected by a number of environmental factors including pH, toxicity, metals, and un-
ionized ammonia. Nitrification is pH-sensitive and rates decline significantly at pH values below 6.8. At pH
values near 5.8 to 6.0, the rates may be 10 to 20 percent of the rate at pH 7.0. It was proven that optimal
nitrification rates occur at pH values in the 7.5 to 8.0 range, therefore a pH of 7.0 to 7.2 is normally used to
maintain reasonably nitrification rates [5]. On the other hand, nitrifying organisms are sensitive to a wide
range of organic and inorganic compounds; nitrifiers have been shown to be good indicators of the presence
of organic toxic compounds at low concentrations [6].
Activated-sludge processes can be designed with baffle walls to intentionally create a number of
complete-mix activated-sludge zones operating in series. For the same reactor volume, reactors in series can
provide greater treatment capacity. Modified Ludzak-Ettinger (MLE) process is the most common process
used for biological nitrogen removal in municipal wastewater treatment. The process consists of an anoxic
tank followed by the aeration tank where nitrification occurs. Nitrate produced in the aeration tank is
recycled back to the anoxic tank. Because the organic substrate in the influent wastewater provides the
electron donor for oxidation reduction reactions using nitrate, the process is termed substrate denitrification.
Further, because of the anoxic process precedes the aeration tank, the process is known as a preanoxic
denitrification [1].

2. Methodology
2.1. Conceptual Design of Modified Reactor
The core principle of the design was to simulate complete-mix activated-sludge process in the modified
reactor. The optimum aeration volume for single-sludge (BOD removal and nitrification) CMAS process
was determined from the process design calculation, based on the assumed daily organic loading 0.0016 kg
BOD /day and mixed-liquor temperature 20 C. A series of continuous narrow baffle walls was then
installed to intentionally create a number of complete-mix activated-sludge zones (Figure 2.1). The gap
between each baffle wall was designed to be 10 mm, in order to induce the plug-flow of the sludge through
hydraulic and gravity action, keeping the biomass in complete suspension. Based on the design calculation,
the baffle walls were configured to occupy a total volume of 8.5 liters with 20 partitions (HRT = 26 hours).
Two liters of anoxic compartment was provided prior to the aeration chamber (HRT = 2 hours). The
supernatant in the clarifier will be recycled back to the pre-anoxic compartment for de-nitrification purpose.
A similar reactor without the baffle walls was created to simulate the conventional aeration basin.

2.2. Feasibility Study of Synthetic Wastewater


Synthetic wastewater was produced by dissolving grinded cats’ food in distilled water to imitate
medium strength domestic wastewater, mainly to provide more consistent organic loadings. Different
concentrations of synthetic wastewater were evaluated in the laboratory to find the suitable concentration and
sufficient nutrients (C: N: P ratio) for the microorganisms.

2.3. Operation and Maintenance of Reactors


The designed reactors were fabricated with 5 mm thick acrylic glass, and a sufficient number of tube
diffusers were installed to ensure minimum D.O. of 2 mg/L. During the operation stage, both of the reactors
were set up in the laboratory using biological biomass from the domestic STP as the starting biomass.
Influent was pumped into the reactors continuously at the rate of 8 liters/day by using Masterflex Precision
Pump with tubing L/S 16 (Figure 2). The modified reactor was operated at extended aeration (SRT = 40
days, design MLSS = 3000 mg/L), while the control reactor was operated at conventional aeration (SRT = 2
days, design MLSS = 1000 mg/L). 10 days of acclimatization period was set to stabilize the biomass, and
104
the sludge age was controlled through daily sludge recycling and wasting. Influent and effluent samples
were collected daily at a pre-determined time and the performance of both reactors was monitored for 10
days continuously.

(a) (b) (c)


Figure 2.1: Computer simulation of (a) modified reactor, (b) control reactor, and (b) laboratory reactors

3. Results and discussions


3.1. Characteristics Study of Synthetic Wastewater
The characteristics of cats’ food were examined to determine its feasibility as the synthetic wastewater.
0.5 gram of grinded cats food dissolved in 1 liter of distilled water produced the following parameters:
Table 3.1: Characteristics of 0.5 gram/liter of dissolved cats food
Parameter Value (mg/L)
COD 450
BOD 200
TSS 180
TKN 70
NH3 14
NO Negligible
Phosphorus 8
C:N:P 100:16:2
0.5 gram/liters of dissolved cats’ food was found to exhibit the characteristics of medium strength
domestic wastewater. The minimum C: N: P ratio was studied to ensure there are sufficient nutrients for the
microorganisms. The concentration of ammonia in the synthetic wastewater was noticed to be lower
compared to typical domestic wastewater. Nevertheless, ammonia is produced during the hydrolysis of
protein in the biological treatment stage, therefore contributing to the overall ammonia content.

3.2. Removal of Organic Matters (COD and ) and Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
The performance of the activated-sludge processes in removing organic matters was measured in terms
of COD and BOD values. Throughout 10 days of monitoring period, the average COD and BOD in the
influent were found to be 445 mg/L and 210 mg/L, respectively. This tallied with the characteristics study of
the synthetic wastewater. By comparison, the modified reactor effectively removed 92.3% of COD and 91.7%
of BOD in average, while the control reactor managed to remove 87.7% of COD and 87.0% of BOD . This
indicates that the modified reactor slightly outperformed the control reactor in the removal of organic matters.
Nevertheless, the average value of COD and BOD in the effluent discharge from both of the reactors was
shown to meet the D.O.E regulations (Figure 3.1).

(a) (b) (c)


Figure 3.2: Readings of (a) COD, (b) , and (c) TSS
The total suspended solids (TSS) is one of the most important physical characteristic of wastewater, as
wastewater contains a variety of solid materials varying from rags to colloidal material. On average, the TSS

105
level in the influent was found to be 191 mg/L, while the TSS in the effluents for both control and modified
reactor was observed to be ranging from 43 to 46 mg/L.

3.3. Removal of Ammonia-Nitrogen and Nitrate


The main parameter of concern in this study is ammonia-nitrogen (NH3-N), which forms the basis for
the design of the modified reactor. In order to encourage nitrification, the modified reactor was operated at
extended aeration to provide higher retention time for the nitrifiers to grow. Figure 3.2 shows the average
ammonia level in the influent to be 14 mg/L. By comparison, the modified reactor has effectively removed
about 97.5% of ammonia in average, while the control reactor only managed to remove approximately 35.8%
of ammonia. This has proven that the modified reactor has significantly outperformed the control reactor by
approximately 60% in the ammonia removal capacity. Furthermore, the average ammonia level in the
effluent discharge from the control reactor was found to violate the regulations limit, which averaged 9.1
mg/L.

(a) (b)
Figure 3.2: Readings of (a) Ammonia-Nitrogen, and (b) Nitrate

Due to the pre-anoxic compartment in the modified reactor, the average nitrate level in the modified
reactor was observed to be approximately 1.0 mg/L. A certain level of nitrate was found in the effluent of the
control reactor, ranging from 2.3 to 4.1 mg/L, which indicate low nitrification rate in the control reactor.

3.4. Monitoring of MLVSS, SVI, pH and Temperature


The amount of the microorganisms in the biological sludge is denoted by the mixed-liquor volatile
suspended-solids (MLVSS), and it is an important design criterion in the activated-sludge process. At steady
state, the concentration of biological biomass in the reactors remained approximately constant. Owing to the
synthesis of the biological matter, there is a net yield of MLVSS in the reactor; therefore it is necessary to
remove from the system a mass of MLVSS daily to maintain the required concentration. On average, the
MLVSS value for control and modified reactors were determined to be 1062 mg/L and 2056 mg/L,
respectively. No significant exponential biomass growth was observed for both of the reactors during the
first 10 days of performance monitoring process. The SVI values for both reactors are ranging from 43 to 55,
showing a good settling characteristic (SVI < 100). The average pH was maintained at 7.3 for the influent
sample, and ranging between 7.7 to 7.8 for the effluents. On the other hand, the temperature of the influent
was close to room temperature at 25 ⁰C, while the temperatures for both effluents were measured to be
around 21 ⁰C due to aeration process. Table 3.2 shows the average value of the measured parameters:
Table 3.2: Average value of measured parameter
Parameter Influent Control Modified
MLSS - 1829 mg/L 3478 mg/L
MLVSS - 1062 mg/L 2056 mg/L
SVI - 55 43
pH 7.3 7.7 7.8
Temperature 25.2 21.5 21.8

3.5. Nitrification kinetics, k, for continuous biological reactor

106
In order to compare the nitrification kinetics between the control and the modified reactor, the ammonia
concentration in the influent was increased gradually by adding in ammonium chloride. The specific
substrate removal rate (kg ammonia removed per day / kg MLVSS) was plotted against the effluent ammonia
(mg/L) to determine the slope of the graph, which corresponded to the nitrification kinetics (k) of the reactor.
The nitrification kinetic yields the degradation rate of ammonia to nitrate. From figure 3.3, the nitrification
kinetic of the control and modified reactor was observed to be 0.0823 and 10.321, respectively. The
nitrification kinetic in the control reactor was considered as negligible due to the conventional activated-
sludge process, which inhibits the growth of nitrifiers. In contrast, the modified reactor has achieved
nitrification kinetic of 10.32, indicating a high degradation rate of ammonia-nitrogen.

(a) (b)
Figure 3.3: Nitrification kinetics of (a) conventional aeration, and (b) extended aeration

4. Conclusion
In this study, it was proven that conventional activated-sludge system was not able to meet the new ammonia
limit imposed by the D.O.E Malaysia. The single-sludge aerobic baffled reactor was designed to enhance the
aeration process through modified conventional activated-sludge system. The results indicate that the
modified reactor managed to outperform the control reactor by approximately 60% in the ammonia removal.
Besides solving the problem of D.O.E requirements, the design also leads to enormous energy saving as the
usage of mechanical mixers are eliminated. The proposed biological reactor may have the ability to be
commercialized as an alternative design in the domestic sewage treatment plant.

5. Acknowledgement
The authors would like to acknowledge the project supervisors, laboratory technologists and the University
in making this research possible.

6. References
[1] Metcalf and Eddy, (2004). Wastewater Engineering Treatment and Reuse, Fourth Edition, McGraw-Hill, New
York, USA.
[2] Department of Environment Malaysia, (2009). Environmental Quality (Sewage) Regulations 2009, Environmental
Quality Act 1974, Environmental Quality (Control of Pollution from Solid Waste Transfer Station and Landfill)
Regulations 2009
[3] Balakrishnan, S., & Eckenfelder W. W., (1970). Nitrogen Removal by Modified Activated Sludge Process, Journal
of the Sanitary Engineering Division, Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers.
[4] Randall, C.W., Barnand, J. L, & Stensel, H. D., (1992). Design and Retrofit of Wastewater Treatment Plants for
Biological Nutrient Removal, Volume 5, Water Quality Management Library, Technomic Publishing Co.,
Lancaster, PA.
[5] United States Environmental Protection Agency, (1993). U.S. EPA 1993
[6] Blum, D. J. W., & Speece, R. E., (1991). A Database of Chemical Toxicity to Environmental Bacteria and Its use
in Interspecies Comparisons and Correlations, Research Journal, Water Pollution Control Federation, vol. 63, p.
198.
[7] AHPA – AWWA, Standard Method for Water and Wastewater Examination, 17th Edition, American Public Health
Association/ America Water Works Association, Washington, DC, 1992.

107

You might also like