INSTRUCTION FOR MAQMSR SUPPLIER AUDIT

1. ALL AUTOMOTIVE MANUFACTURERS THAT ARE NOT CERTIFIED TO TS-16949 BY

SEPTEMBER 2015, BUT SUPPLY PARTS TO CUSTOMER(S) THAT ARE CERTIFIED TO
ISO TS-16949 WILL BE REQUIRED TO MEET AT MINIMUM ISO-9001 AND MAQMSR
(MINIMUM AUTOMOTIVE QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS)

2. THE AUDIT SHOULD BE PERFORMED BY REFERENCING THE ACTUAL MAQMSR GUIDELINES

FOR MORE CLARITY IF NEEDED.

3. YOU NEED TO FILL OUT THE CHECKLIST (IDENTIFIED ON TAB). AUDIT TO EACH QUESTION SO AS
TO BE AS ACCURATE AS POSSIBLE. PROVIDE EVIDENCE DOCUMENTATION

4. INTERNAL AUDIT SUMMARY WILL AUTOMATICALLY FILL IN FROM CHECKLIST.

5. IF THIS IS COMPLETED BY THE SUPPLIER, AS A SELF-AUDIT PLEASE

ENSURE ROCKNEL RECEIVES A COPY ([email protected])
6. FOR SUPPLIER SELF-AUDITS THE PLANT NEEDS TO HAVE DEFINED CRITERIA
THAT JUSTIFIES A SELF-AUDIT
7. FORWARD A COPY OF ALL COMPLETED AUDITS TO [email protected]

NOTE: IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT ([email protected])

 MINIMUM AUTOMOTIVE QUALITY MANAGEMENT
Revision: 09-09-15

(MAQMSR)

PLANT
Section from MAQMSR

Supplier Name:
MANAGER:
QUALITY
Supplier Location:
MANAGER:
0 - Supplier demonstrates no compliance to a 2 - Supplier has a docum
1 - Supplier has a documented system
documented system OR no documented system in shows only minor exc
but shows only limited compliance.
place. complian

1. CONTROL PLAN
QUESTION: EVIDENCE Score
# REQUIRED
LOOK FOR
(0,1,2,3)
G/Y/R

DEVELOP CONTROL PLANS AT THE CORRECT WELL CONSTRUCTED,

1.1 1 SYSTEM, SUBSYSTEM, COMPONENT? CONTROL PLANS ACCURATE & CURRENT

CORRECT SHOULD BE IDENTIFIED

PRE-LAUNCH AND PRODUCTION
1.1 2 CONTROL PLANS
CONTROL PLANS ON EACH ONE
FOR EACH PHASE. INDICATING PHASE.
ENSURE PROPER
LIST CONTROLS FOR CORRECT IDENTIFICATION OF
1.1 3 MANUFACTURING PROCESS? CONTROL PLANS CONTROL METHODS ARE
LISTED.
CORRECTLY THIS MAY INCLUDE 100%
INCLUDE METHODS FOR MONITORING
1.1 4 FOR SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS?
CREATED CONTROL VISUAL, SENSORS,
PLANS CAMERAS, ETC..

ANY SPECIAL CUSTOMER

CORRECT
DEFINED CONTROLS
INCLUDE CUSTOMER-REQUIRED CONTROL PLANS/
1.1 5 INFO.(IF APPLICABLE)? WORK
ALSO INCLUDED IN WORK
INSTRUCTIONS AT WORK
INSTRUCTIONS
CELL
 MINIMUM AUTOMOTIVE QUALITY MANAGEMENT
Revision: 09-09-15

(MAQMSR)
LOOK FOR EVIDENCE ON
INITIATE REACTION PLAN WHEN
REACTION TO SAID QUALITY INSPECTION
1.1 6 PROCESS IS UNSTABLE OR
CONDITIONS SHEETS, AND SPC
Section from MAQMSR

STATISTICALLY OUT OF CONTROL

RECORDS.
WORK INSTRUCTIONS ARE AVAILABLE CONTROL PLANS / LOOK FOR LINKS
1.2 7 AND ARE DERIVED FROM WORK BETWEEN THESE TWO
APPROPRIATE CONTROL PLANS INSTRUCTIONS DOCUMENTS.
JOB SET-UPS ARE VERIFIED,
SET-UP RECORDS / CURRENT FIRST PIECE
1.3 8 INCLUDING WORK INSTRUCTIONS
INSTRUCTIONS APPROVAL
FOR SET UP & START UP

INSTRUCTIONS, PM CHECK FOR RECORDED

ARE THERE PLANNED MAINTENANCE
1.4 9 ACTIVITIES?
SOFTWARE, FREQUENCIES &
RECORDS, ETC… COMPLETION

PACKAGING, PROTECTION AND STORAGE AREAS,

PROCEDURE /
1.4 10 PRESEVATION OF EQUIPMENT
INSTRUCTIONS
ENVIRONMENTALLY SAFE
TOOLING AND GAUGES IN PLACE? ETC...?

STORAGE AREAS,
INSTRUCTIONS, PM COUNTING MECHANISMS
ARE SPARE PARTS AVAILABLE FOR
1.4 11 KEY EQUIPMENT?
SOFTWARE, i.e. SOFTWARE FOR
RECORDS, ETC… INVENTORY PURPOSES
ETC...

ARE CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT

TARGETS ESTABLISHED FOR WRITTEN MANAGEMENT REVIEW
1.4 12 PLANNED AND UNPLANNED OBJECTIVES RECORDS OR OTHER.
DOWNTIME?

CLEAR PRECISE EACH AND EVERY

INFORMATION CONTAINER THAT HOLDS
IS PRODUCT THROUGHOUT THE
USUALLY ON MATERIAL,
PLANT CLEARLY IDENTIFIED AS TO
1.5 13 MATERIAL IDENTIFICATION AND
LABEL , AS STATED COMPONENTS, W.I.P.,
IN AN AND FINISHED GOODS,
STATUS?
PRODCEDURE OR ALL REQUIRE
INSTRUCTION. IDENTIFICATION.

PER CONTROL PLAN

CONTROL PLAN,
HAS THE SUPPLIER IDENTIFIED CHECK STATUS AFTER
APPLICABLE
1.5 14 PRODUCT STATUS WITH RESPECT TO
INSTRUCTIONS,
EACH INSPECTION POINT
INPECTION CHECKS? FOR IDENTIFICATION OF
RECORDS
STATUS
 MINIMUM AUTOMOTIVE QUALITY MANAGEMENT
Revision: 09-09-15

(MAQMSR)
WHERE TRACEABILITY IS A
LOT # OR DATES OF
1.5 15 REQUIREMENT, DOES THE SUPPLIER LOGS / RECORDS
MANUFACTURE
MAINTAIN RECORDS?
Section from MAQMSR
 MINIMUM AUTOMOTIVE QUALITY MANAGEMENT
Revision: 09-09-15

(MAQMSR)
2. PROCESS APPROACH
QUESTION: EVIDENCE
LOOK FOR Score G/Y/R
Section from MAQMSR

REQUIRED

APPROPRIATE
DOCUMENTS DEFINE
INPUTS, SERIES OF
OUTPUTS, TO INCLUDE
ALL RESOURCES,
MATERIALS, METHODS,
PROCESS MAPS,
HAS THE SUPPLIER DEFINED IT'S MEASUREMENTS
2.1 1 PROCESSES AND SUB-PROCESSES?
FLOW DIAGRAMS,
NECESSARY TO MAKE
ETC…
THE PROCESS WORK
USING THE PDCA
METHODOLOGY
DESCRIBED IN TS-16949
TECHNICAL
SPECIFICATION.

DEFINED
PROCESSES
HAS THE SUPPLIER IMPLEMENTED CONTROL NUMBERS,
INCLUDED AS PART
2.1 2 AND CONTROLLED IT'S DEFINED
OF THE QUALITY
SAME FORMATTING FOR
PROCESSES? EACH DEFINED PROCESS
MANAGEMENT
SYSTEM

AN OVERALL SEARCH FOR INPUTS

METHOD / MAP / AND OUTPUTS BETWEEN
HAS THE SUPPLIER DEFINED THE
FLOW DIAGRAM INDIVIDUAL DEFINED
2.1 3 PROCESSES INTERACTIONS AND
THAT SHOWS ALL PROCESSES. LINKAGE
LINKAGES?
DEFINED BETWEEN FMEA, FLOW
PROCESSES DIAGRAM AND PCP

DOES THE SUPPLIER MONITOR

ACTUAL RECORD MANAGEMENT REVIEW
2.1 4 DEFINED PROCESSES FOR
OF ANALYSIS RECORDS
EFFECTIVENESS
 MINIMUM AUTOMOTIVE QUALITY MANAGEMENT
Revision: 09-09-15

(MAQMSR)

TRAINING
RECORDS, WELL
Section from MAQMSR

DEFINED MAPPING
OF THEIR RECENT TRAINING THAT
DOES THE SUPPPLIER HAVE AN
PROCESS, VERBAL INCLUDES APPLICABLE
2.1 5 UNDERSTANDING OF PROCESS
EXPLANATION REQUIREMENTS (i.e. ISO,
APPROACH?
THROUGH TS, ETC…)
INTERVIEWS.
MANAGEMENT
REVIEW RECORDS

3. PERFORMANCE
QUESTION: EVIDENCE
REQUIRED
LOOK FOR Score G/Y/R

MONITORING OVER A
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RECORDS OF PERIOD OF TIME WITH
3.1 1 MEASURING DELIVERED PART DELIVERY CONTINUAL EVALUATION
QUALITY PERFORMANCE PERFORMANCE OF PERFORMANCE
(MANAGEMENT REVIEW)
 MINIMUM AUTOMOTIVE QUALITY MANAGEMENT
Revision: 09-09-15

(MAQMSR)
MONITORING OVER A
RECORDS OF PERIOD OF TIME WITH
3.1 2 DELIVERY SCHEDULE PERFORMANCE DELIVERY CONTINUAL EVALUATION
Section from MAQMSR

PERFORMANCE OF PERFORMANCE
(MANAGEMENT REVIEW)

MONITORING OVER A
PERIOD OF TIME WITH
DOES SUPPLIER TRACK CUSTOMER RECORDS OF CONTINUAL EVALUATION
3.1 3 COMPLAINTS, INCLUDING FIELD CUSTOMER AND CORRECTIVE
RETURNS? COMPLAINTS ACTION TIMING OF
CUSTOMER ISSUES
(MANAGEMENT REVIEW)

HUNT FOR REGULARITY

OF MEASUREMENT, AND
WHEN THERE IS AN
DOES THE SUPPLIER MONITOR RECORDS OF
ISSUE HAS THERE BEEN
PERFORMANCE OF MANUFACTURING MANUFACTURING
A CORRECTIVE ACTION
PROCESSES TO HELP ENSURE MEASUREMENTS
3.1 4 CONFORMANCE TO CUST. AS IT RELATES TO
ASSIGNED, AND
TRACKED TO CLOSURE.
REQUIREMENTS FOR PRODUCT PRODUCT QUALITY
ALSO IS THERE ANY
QUALITY AND EFFIENCY? AND EFFIENCY
EVIDENCE OF
CONTINUAL
IMPROVEMENTS.
 MINIMUM AUTOMOTIVE QUALITY MANAGEMENT
Revision: 09-09-15

(MAQMSR)
RECORDS OF ONE STATISTICAL DATA:
OF THE CHECK TO ENSURE EACH
FOLLOWING: SHIPMENT HAD IT, AND
Section from MAQMSR

THAT THE DATA WAS IN

*STATISTICAL DATA TOLERANCE.
FROM SUB-
SUPPLIER INSPECTION / TEST:
ENSURE RECORDS ARE
*INSPECTION / TEST ACCURATE.
RECORDS
INCOMING PRODUCT-DOES THE 2ND OR 3RD PARTY
3.2 5 SUPPLIER HAVE EVIDENCE OF *2ND OR 3RD
PARTY
AUDITS: REVIEW
SUPPLIER CONCERNS
PROPER RECEIVING?
ASSESSMENTS OR
AUDITS/WITH GOOD
QUALITY

*EVALUATION BY A
DESIGNATED LAB

*ANOTHER METHOD
AGREED BY THE
CUSTOMER

DOES THE SUPPLIER TRACK THEIR

FREQUENCY OF
3.3 6 SUPPLIERS' DELIVERED PRODUCT RECORDS
DELIVERY VS. TRACKER
CONFORMITY?

DOES THE SUPPLIER TRACK THEIR

FREQUENCY OF
3.3 7 SUPPLIERS' DELIVERY RECORDS
DELIVERY VS. TRACKER
PERFORMANCE (PREMIUM FRIEGHT)?

SHOULD BE
DOES THE SUPPLIER TRACK ISSUES
SEGREGATED WITHIN OR
INVOLVING THEIR SUPPLIERS FOR
3.3 8 CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS INCLUDING
RECORDS SEPARATE FROM THE
REST OF THE CUSTOMER
FIELD RETURNS?
CONCERNS

IS THERE EVIDENCE THAT THE

SUPPLIER PROMOTES THEIR SUB- EVIDENCE OF SUPPLIER
3.3 9 SUPPLIER TO SELF ASSESS IT'S
RECORDS
REVIEWS
PROCESSES?
LOOK FOR EVIDENCE OF
SUPPLIER HAS A DEFINED PROBLEM PROCEDURE /
3.4 10 SOLVING PROCESS? INSTRUCTIONS
5 WHY, CAUSE & EFFECT,
ETC…
 MINIMUM AUTOMOTIVE QUALITY MANAGEMENT
Revision: 09-09-15

(MAQMSR)
CUSTOMER
DESIGNATED
WHEN REQUIRED BY CUSTOMER IS
FORMAT AS A CUSTOMER SPECIFIC
Section from MAQMSR

3.4 11 THE PROPER CORRECTIVE ACTION

RECORD TO REQUIREMENT
FORM USED?
INCLUDE ONLINE
ENTRIES

4. INTERNAL AUDITING
EVIDENCE
QUESTION:
REQUIRED
LOOK FOR Score G/Y/R
Q.M.S. AUDIT - SUPPLIER AUDITS THE EVIDENCE THAT QMS
RECORDS OF
4.1 1 QMS REQUIREMENTS FOR SUB-
AUDITS
AUDITS ARE MANAGED AT
SUPPLIERS? SUB-TIER SUPPLIERS

RECORDS OF BE SURE TO CHECK THAT

AUDITS - ARE ALL MANUFACTURING
MANUF. PROCESS AUDIT-HAS THE APPLICABLE CQI PROCESSES HAVE BEEN
4.2 2 SUPPLIER AUDITED EACH OF THEIR SELF- AUDITED i.e. MOLDING,
MANF. PROCESSES? ASSESSMETNS ASSEMBLY, BRAZING,
COMPLETED AND WELDING, FLOCKING,
CURRENT? ETC…

ENSURE THAT ALL

PRODUCT
PRODUCT AUDIT- IS THE SUPPLIER
REQUIREMENTS SUCH AS
AUDITING PRODUCT AT APPROPRIATE
RECORDS OF DIMENSIONS,
4.3 3 STAGES OF PRODUCTION AND
AUDITS FUNCTIONALITY,
DELIVERY TO VERIFY
PACKAGING AND
CONFORMANCE?
LABELING CONFORM AT
DEFINED FREQUENCIES.
 MINIMUM AUTOMOTIVE QUALITY MANAGEMENT
Revision: 09-09-15

(MAQMSR)

CHECK FOR ALL

Section from MAQMSR

PROCESSES TO BE
CAPTURED ON PLAN,
ALSO ALL SHIFTS, AND
DOES THE SUPPLIER HAVE AN THAT WHEN
4.4 4 ANNUAL AUDIT PLAN THAT COVERS AUDIT PLAN INTERNAL/EXTERNAL
ALL APPLICABLE QMS PROCESSES? NONCONFORMITIES
OCCUR THAT THE AUDIT
PLAN IS REVISED /
INCREASED
APPROPRIATELY

EXTERNAL OR INTERNAL
DOES THE SUPPLIER HAVE QUALIFIED TRAINING (INTERNAL
AUDITOR TRAINING
4.5 5 AUDITORS THAT CAN AUDIT ISO-9001
RECORDS
SHOULD MEET YOUR
AND MAQMSR? CUSTOMERS SPECIFIC
REQUIREMENTS)

5. CONTROL OF NON-CONFORMING PRODUCT

QUESTION:
EVIDENCE
REQUIRED
LOOK FOR Score G/Y/R
DOES THE SUPPLIER LABEL ANY ALL SUSPECT MATERIAL
APPROPRIATE
5.1 1 UNIDENTIFIED OR SUSPECT
IDENTIFICATION
CONTROLLED AND
PRODUCT AS NON-CONFORMING? IDENTIFIED

FIND ANY REWORK

AREAS AND CHECK FOR
INSTRUCTIONS, ALERTS /
DEVIATIONS FORMS CAN
ARE INSTRUCTIONS FOR REWORK BE USED FOR THIS
REWORK
5.2 2 INCLUDING RE-INSPECTION
INSTRUCTIONS
PURPOSE. AFTER
REQUIREMENTS ACCESSIBLE ? REWORK IS COMPLETED
IS THE REWORKED
PRODUCT INSPECTED BY
AN INDEPENDENT
EMPLOYEE(S)?
 MINIMUM AUTOMOTIVE QUALITY MANAGEMENT
Revision: 09-09-15

(MAQMSR)

IF THE CUSTOMER HAS

BEEN CONTACTED THEN
Section from MAQMSR

DOES / HAS THE SUPPLIER THERE SHOULD ALWAYS

5.3 3 CONTACTED THE CUSTOMER WHEN RECORDS BE A RECORD OF THAT
N/C PRODUCT HAS BEEN SHIPPED? EVENT. MAY BE
RECORDED IN A
CUSTOMER 8D

IF THE CUSTOMER HAS

IS A CUSTOMER WAIVER OBTAINED
BEEN CONTACTED THEN
WHEN PRODUCT / MANUF. PROCESS
5.4 4 IS DIFFERENT FROM WHAT WAS
RECORDS THERE SHOULD ALWAYS
BE A RECORD OF THAT
PPAPed?
EVENT.

IF THE CUSTOMER HAS

IS A RECORD MAINTAINED OF BEEN CONTACTED THEN
5.4 5 EXPIRATION DATE OR QUANTITY RECORDS THERE SHOULD ALWAYS
AUTHORIZED? BE A RECORD OF THAT
EVENT.

IS MATERIAL THAT IS SHIIPPED ON A EVIDENCE CAN BE

CUSTOMER WAIVER/AUTHORIZATION PROCEDURE / FOUND IN PAST
5.4 6 PROPERLY IDENTIFIED ON EACH INSTRUCTIONS CUSTOMER 8Ds, EMAILS
CONTAINER? ETC

DOES SUPPLIERS APPROVE PROCEDURE /

WRITTEN COMMUNIQUE'
5.4 7 DEVIATIONS/WAIVERS FROM THEIR INSTRUCTIONS
OR SUPPLIER 8Ds, ETC…
SUB-SUPPLIERS? ALSO RECORDS

6. PART APPROVAL
QUESTION:
EVIDENCE
REQUIRED
LOOK FOR Score G/Y/R

PROCEDURE /
INSTRUCTION.
PRODUCT APPROVAL PROCESS -
CUSTOMER
DOES THE SUPPLIER FOLLOW AN APPROVED / SIGNED OFF
6.1 1 APPROVAL PROCESS RECOGNIZED
SPECIFIC
APPROVAL PACKAGE(S)
REQUIREMENTS
BY THE CUSTOMER?
VS. APPROVAL
PACKAGE
 MINIMUM AUTOMOTIVE QUALITY MANAGEMENT
Revision: 09-09-15

(MAQMSR)

ENGINEERING SPECIFICATIONS- PROCEDURE

DOES SUPPLIER HAVE A PROCESS TO /INSTRUCTION / EMAILS, LOGS WITH
Section from MAQMSR

6.2 2 ASSURE THE TIMELY REVIEW, LOG OF EXTERNAL DATES RECEIVED VS.
DISTRIBUTION, IMPLEMENTATION OF CUSTOMER IMPLEMENTED
CUST. ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION? DOCUMENTATION

CHECK QUALITY
DOES THE SUPPLIER RECORD WHEN
DOCUMENTATION
6.2 3 CHANGES ARE IMPLEMENTED IN RECORDS
VERSUS THE CHANGE AS
PRODUCTION
APPLICABLE.

MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT OF IDENTIFY ALL

MANUFACTURING PROCESSES- IS MANUFACTURING
THERE EVIDENCE TO SHOW THAT THE CAPABILITY PROCESSES, AND THEN
6.3 4 SUPPLIER PERFORMS CAP STUDIES STUDIES VERIFY THAT CAP
ON ALL APPLICABLE MANUFACTURING STUDIES EXIST FOR
PROCESSES? EACH PROCESS.

SHOULD BE EQUAL OR
HAS THE SUPPLIER MAINTAINED SAID GREATER TO CAP STUDY
6.3 5 CAP STUDY RESULTS?
SPC RECORDS
RESULTS OF INITIAL PPAP
PACKAGE.

CONTROL PLAN WALK THE CONTROL

ARE CONTROL PLANS FOLLOWED APPROVALS, TEAM PLAN AND VERIFY
6.3 6 AND ACCURATE ? MEMBERS, PSW ACCURACY VS. CURRENT
SIGN-OFFS PROCESS.

USE CHANGE LOG /

RECORD AND VERIFY TO
CAP STUDIES ON HAND.
ARE CAP STUDIES DONE AFTER (PPAP CAP STUDIES AT
6.3 7 ANY/ALL PRODUCT / PROCESS RECORDS MIN SHOULD BE
CHANGES? RETAINED FOR LIFE OF
PROGRAM INCLUDING
SERVICE PLUS ONE
YEAR.)
 MINIMUM AUTOMOTIVE QUALITY MANAGEMENT
Revision: 09-09-15

(MAQMSR)

DURING A CONTROL
Section from MAQMSR

PLAN WALK THROUGH

VERIFY ANY
DIFFERENCES FROM
RECORDS AVAILABLE SHOWING CONTROL PLAN. REVIEW
6.3 8 EFFECTIVE DATES OF PROCESS CHANGE RECORDS INITIAL PPAP VS
CHANGES? CURRENT CONTROL
PLAN, THEN TAKE THAT
INFORMATION AND
CHECK THAT AGAINST
KNOWN CHANGES.

HAS THE APPROPRIATE MSA

CALIBRATION/
METHODOLOGY BEEN USED ON ALL
6.4 9 MEASUREMENT/TEST EQUIPMENT
VERIFICATION REVIEW MSA RECORDS
RECORDS
AFFECTING PRODUCT QUALITY?

CALIBRATION/VERIFICATION FOR ALL SAMPLE DURING

MEASUREMENT EQUIPMENT, CONTROL PLAN WALK
6.5 10 INCLUDING EMPLOYEE AND
RECORDS
THROUGH. THEN MATCH
CUSTOMER OWNED? TO RECORDS.
IS MEASUREMENT EQUIPMENT
CALIBRATED TO ESTABLISHED RECORDS * UNIQUE EQUIPMENT
STANDARDS? IDENTIFICATION (TO
INCLUDE MEASUREMENT
STANDARD AGAINST
WHICH THE EQUIPMENT
IS CALIBRATED)

6.5 11 *STATEMENTS OF
CONFORMITY TO
SPECIFICATION AFTER
CAL. / VER. AND
NOTIFICATION TO
CUSTOMER IF SUSPECT
PRODUCT OR MATERIAL
WAS SHIPPED.
 MINIMUM AUTOMOTIVE QUALITY MANAGEMENT
Revision: 09-09-15

(MAQMSR)

7. MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY
Section from MAQMSR

QUESTION: EVIDENCE
REQUIRED
LOOK FOR Score G/Y/R

IS THERE A SCHEDULED SUPPLIER

MANAGEMENT
TOP MANAGEMENT REVIEW OF
REVIEW & CONFORMITY OR
7.1 1 PRODUCT REALIZATION PROCESSES
INTERNAL AND CORRECTIVE ACTION
TO ASSURE THEIR EFFECTIVENESS
EXTERNAL AUDITS
AND EFFICIENCY?

ARE QUALITY OBJECTIVES AND THE LOOK TO SEE IF THE

INTERVIEWS AND
OVERALL QUALITY POLICY QUALITY POLICY IS
7.2 2 COMMUNICATED AND UNDERSTOOD
LEVEL ONE
POSTED IN MULTIPLE
DOCUMENTATION
THROUGHOUT THE ORGANIZATION? AREAS.

CAN BE AN AUTOMATED
IS SUPPLIER MANAGEMENT
SYSTEM OR EMAIL.
CONTACTED WHENEVER PROCESS
SHOULD BE
7.3 3 OR PRODUCT DOES NOT CONFORM RECORDS
COMPLIMENTED WITH
AND THERE IS A RISK OF SHIPPING
DOCUMENTATION
NON-CONFORMING PRODUCT?
SUPPORTING PRACTICE

HAS THE SUPPLIER IDENTIFIED WHO PROCEDURE / INTERVIEW SEVERAL

7.3 4 CAN STOP PRODUCTION ? INSTRUCTION PERSONNEL

DOES THE SUPPLIER HAVE

PROCEDURE/
PERSONNEL ON ALL SHIFTS THAT
7.3 5 ENSURE CONFORMITY TO PRODUCT
INSTRUCTION/ INTERVIEW
JOB DESCRIPTION
REQUIREMENTS?

HAS SUPPLIER DELEGATED

ORGANIZATIONAL USUALLY QUALITY
RESPONSIBILITY AND AUTHORITY TO
7.4 6 SOMEONE TO ENSURE CUSTOMER
CHART / JOB MANAGER BUT NOT
DESCRIPTION NECESSARILY
REQUIREMENTS ARE ADDRESSED?
 MINIMUM AUTOMOTIVE QUALITY MANAGEMENT
Revision: 09-09-15

(MAQMSR)

DOES QMS REVIEWS, AT A MINIMUM,

SEE MANAGEMENT
Section from MAQMSR

INCLUDE QUALITY OBJECTIVES AND

7.5 7 CUSTOMER SATISFACTION WITH
RECORDS REVIEWS FOR SAID
RECORDS
PRODUCT SUPPLIED?

DOES MANAGEMENT REVIEW HAVE SEE MANAGEMENT

7.5.1 8 AN INPUT OF POTENTIAL AND ACTUAL RECORDS REVIEWS FOR SAID
FIELD FAILURES? RECORDS

SHOULD BE PART OF THE

DOES THE SUPPLIER HAVE ROBUST PROCEDURE / CONTROLLED QMS.
7.5.2 9 CONTINGENCY PLANS? INSTRUCTION CHECK FOR ALL
POTENTIAL SCENARIOS.

DOES THE SUPPLIER CONFORM TO

ALL REQUIREMENTS OF CONTROL
USE THE MAQMSR OR TS-
ANNEX 10 PLAN AS STATED IN THE ANNEX OF CONTROL PLANS
16949 TO CROSS CHECK.
MAQMSR AND BACK SECTION OF TS-
16949?
TIVE QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS AUDIT Revision: 09-09-15

(MAQMSR)

Audit Date:

Auditor Name:

2 - Supplier has a documented system and

3 - Supplier has a documented process
shows only minor exceptions of non-
and can demonstrate full compliance.
compliance.

AUDIT WORKSHEET
OBSERVATIONS
TIVE QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS AUDIT Revision: 09-09-15

(MAQMSR)
TIVE QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS AUDIT Revision: 09-09-15

(MAQMSR)
TIVE QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS AUDIT Revision: 09-09-15

(MAQMSR)
AUDIT WORKSHEET
OBSERVATIONS
TIVE QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS AUDIT Revision: 09-09-15

(MAQMSR)

AUDIT WORKSHEET
OBSERVATIONS
TIVE QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS AUDIT Revision: 09-09-15

(MAQMSR)
TIVE QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS AUDIT Revision: 09-09-15

(MAQMSR)
TIVE QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS AUDIT Revision: 09-09-15

(MAQMSR)

AUDIT WORKSHEET
OBSERVATIONS
TIVE QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS AUDIT Revision: 09-09-15

(MAQMSR)

AUDIT WORKSHEET

OBSERVATIONS
TIVE QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS AUDIT Revision: 09-09-15

(MAQMSR)

AUDIT WORKSHEET
OBSERVATIONS
TIVE QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS AUDIT Revision: 09-09-15

(MAQMSR)
TIVE QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS AUDIT Revision: 09-09-15

(MAQMSR)
TIVE QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS AUDIT Revision: 09-09-15

(MAQMSR)

AUDIT WORKSHEET

OBSERVATIONS
TIVE QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS AUDIT Revision: 09-09-15

(MAQMSR)
 MINIMUM AUTOMOTIVE QUALITY MANAGEMENT SY
(MAQMSR)

SUPPLIER PLANT AUD

NAME: MANAGER: DAT

SUPPLIER QUALITY AUDITO

LOCATION: MANAGER: NAM

MAQMSR SUPPLIER AUDIT

1. CONTROL PLANS 5. CONTROL OF NON-CON
0 DEVELOP CONTROL PLANS AT THE SYSTEM, SUBSYSTEM,COMPONENT? 0 5.1) DOES THE SUPPLIER LABEL ANY U
0 FOR PRELAUNCH AND PRODUCTION? 0 5.2) INSTRUCTIONS FOR REWORK INC
0 LIST CONTROLS FOR MANUFACTURING PROCESS? 0 5.3) DOES / HAS THE SUPPLIER CONTA
0 INCLUDE METHODS FOR MONITORING FOR SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS? 5.4) IS A CUSTOMER WAIVER OBTAINE
0
0 INCLUDE CUSTOMER-REQUIRED INFO.(IF APPLICABLE)? WAS PPAPed?
0 INITIATE REACTION PLAN WHEN PROCESS IS UNSTABLE OR STATISTICALLY OUT 0 IS A RECORD MAINTAINED OF EXPIRA
0 1.2) WORK INSTRUCTIONS ARE AVAILABLE AND ARE DERIVED FROM I.E. CONTROL PLAN MATERIAL SHIPPED ON A CUSTOMER
0
0 1.3) JOB SET-UPS ARE VERIFIED, WORK INSTRUCTIONS FOR SET-UP ARE THERE CONTAINER?
0 1.4) ARE THERE PLANNED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES? 0 DOES SUPPLIERS APPROVE DEVIATIO

0 ARE PACKAGING, AND PRESEVATION OF EQUIPMENT TOOLING AND GAUGES IN PLACE? 0 Total
0 ARE SPARE PARTS AVAILABLE FOR KEY EQUIPMENT?
0 DOES MAINTENANCE HAVE WRITTEN OBJECTIVES, THAT ARE EVALUATED AND IMPROVED ON?

0 1.5) I.D. & TRACEABILITY: ARE ALL PRODUCT IDENTIFIED BY SUITABLE MEANS? 6. PART APPROVAL
0 HAS THE SUPPLIER IDENTIFIED PRODUCT STATUS WITH RESPECT TO INPECTION CHECKS? 6.1) PRODUCT APPROVAL PROCESS -
0
0 WHERE TRACEABILITY IS A REQUIREMENT, DOES THE SUPPLIER MAINTAIN RECORDS? AN APPROVAL PROCESS RECOGNIZE

0 Total Potential 45 0% 6.2) ENGINEERING SPECIFICATIONS-D

0 ASSURE THE TIMELY REVIEW, DISTRIB

OF CUST. ENGINEERING SPECIFICATI

2. PROCESS APPROACH 0 DOES THE SUPPLIER RECORD WHEN

0 HAS THE SUPPLIER DEFINED IT'S PROCESSES AND SUB-PROCESSES? 6.3) MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT
0 HAS THE SUPPLIER IMPLEMENTED AND CONTROLLED IT'S DEFINED PROCESSES? 0 IS THERE EVIDENCE TO SHOW THAT T
0 HAS THE SUPPLIER DEFINED THE PROCESSES INTERACTIONS AND LINKAGES? ON ALL MANUFACTURING PROCESSE
0 DOES THE SUPPLIER MONITOR SAID PROCESSES FOR "EFFECTIVENESS 0 HAS THE SUPPLIER MAINTAINED SAID
0 DOES THE SUPPPLIER HAVE AN UNDERSTANDING OF PROCESS APPROACH? 0 ARE CONTROL PLANS FOLLOWED AN

0 Total Potential 15 0% 0 ARE CAP STUDIES DONE AFTER ANY/A

0 RECORDS AVAILABLE SHOWING EFFE
0 6.4) MSA-HAS THERE BEEN STATISTIC

3. PERFORMANCE 0 6.5) CALIBRATION/VERIFICATION RECO

0 3.1) PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: DELIVERED PART QUALITY PERFORMANCE TRACKED? INCLUDING EMPLOYEE AND CUSTOM
0 SUPPLIER TRACK DELIVERY SCHEDULE PERFORMANCE INCLUDING PREMIUM FREIGHT? 0 ARE ALL THE REQUIREMENTS AS SEE
0 DOES SUPPLIER TRACK CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS, INCLUDING FIELD RETURNS? 6.6) CHANGE CONTROL- HAS THE SUP
Err:509
DOES THE SUPPLIER MONITOR PERFORMANCE OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES TO HELP REACT TO CHANGES TO PRODUCT R
0
ENSURE CONFORMANCE TO CUST. REQUIREMENTS FOR PRODUCT QUALITY AND EFFIENCY? 6.7) CHANGE CONTROL NOTIFICATION
0 3.2) INCOMING PRODUCT-DOES THE SUPPLIER HAVE EVIDENCE OF PROPER RECEIVING? Err:509 SUPPLIER CONTACTS THE CUSTOMER
0 3.3) DOES THE SUPPLIER TRACK THEIR SUPPLIERS' DELIVERED PRODUCT CONFORMITY? IN 6.6?

0 DOES THE SUPPLIER TRACK THEIR SUPPLIERS' DELIVERY PERFORMANCE (PREMIUM FRIEGHT)? Err:509 Total
 DOES THE SUPPLIER TRACK ISSUES INVOLVING THEIR SUPPLIERS FOR CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS
0
INCLUDING FIELD RETURNS?

0 IS THERE EVIDENCE THAT THE SUPPLIER PROMOTES THEIR SUB-SUPPLIER TO SELF ASSESS 7. MANAGEMENT RESPON
IT'S PROCESSES? 7.1) PROCESS MONITORING-SUPPLIER
0
0 3.4) SUPPLIER HAS A DEFINED PROBLEM SOLVING PROCESS? PRODUCT REALIZATION TO ASSURE T
0 WHEN REQUIRED BY CUSTOMER IS THE PROPER CORRECTIVE ACTION FORM USED? 7.2) QUALITY OBJECTIVES AND QUALI
0
0 Total Potential 33 0% DEPLOYED?
7.3) SUPPLIER MANAGEMENT CONTAC
0
PRODUCT DOES NOT CONFORM?

4. INTERNAL AUDITS 0 HAS THE SUPPLIER IDENTIFIED WHO

0 4.1) Q.M.S. AUDIT - SUPPLIER AUDITS THE QMS REQUIREMENTS FOR SUB-SUPPLIERS? DOES THE SUPPLIER HAVE PERSONN
0
0 4.2) MANUF. PROCESS AUDIT-HAS THE SUPPLIER AUDITED EACH OF THEIR MANF. PROCESSES? CONFORMITY TO PRODUCT REQUIRE
0 4.3) PRODUCT AUDIT- THE SUPPLIER AUDITING PRODUCT AT APPROPRIATE STAGES OF PRODUCTION AND DELIVERY
7.4) TO
HASVERIFY
SUPPLIER
CONFORMANCE?
DELEGATED RESP
0
0 4.4) SUPPLIER HAVE AN ANNUAL AUDIT PLAN THAT COVERS ALL APPLICABLE QMS PROCESSES? TO SOMEONE TO ENSURE CUSTOMER
0 4.5) DOES THE SUPPLIER HAVE QUALIFIED AUDITORS THAT CAN AUDIT ISO-9001 AND MAQMSR? 7.5) QMS REVIEWS AT A MINIMUM INCL
0
0 Total Potential 15 0% AND CUSTOMER SATISFACTION WITH
7.5.1) DOES MANAGEMENT REVIEW H
0
ACTUAL FIELD FAILURES?
0 7.5.2) DOES THE SUPPLIER HAVE ROB
ANNEX - DOES THE SUPPLIER CONFO
0
CONTROL PLAN AS STATED IN THE AN

%
Pts
Awarded
Pts Available Summary Status
0% 0 45 CONTROL PLANS RED 0
0% 0 15 PROCESS APPROACH RED 1
0% 0 33 PERFORMANCE RED 2
0% 0 15 INTERNAL AUDITING RED
3
0% 0 21 CONTROL OF NON-CONFORMING PRODUCT RED
Err:509 Err:509 39 PART APPROVAL Err:509 N/A
0% 0 30 MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY RED
Err:509 Err:509 198 Overall Err:509 85%

Summary Scoring: Err:509 60-85%

<59%
VE QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS AUDIT
(MAQMSR)

AUDIT
DATE:

AUDITOR
NAME:

SR SUPPLIER AUDIT
5. CONTROL OF NON-CONFORMING PRODUCT
5.1) DOES THE SUPPLIER LABEL ANY UNIDENTIFIED OR SUSPECT PRODUCT AS NON-CONFORMING?

5.2) INSTRUCTIONS FOR REWORK INCLUDING RE-INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS ARE ACCESSIBLE ?

5.3) DOES / HAS THE SUPPLIER CONTACTED THE CUSTOMER WHEN N/C PRODUCT HAS BEEN SHIPPED?

5.4) IS A CUSTOMER WAIVER OBTAINED WHEN PRODUCT / MANUF. PROCESS IS DIFFERENT FROM WHAT

IS A RECORD MAINTAINED OF EXPIRATION DATE OR QUANTITY AUTHORIZED?

MATERIAL SHIPPED ON A CUSTOMER WAIVER/AUTHORIZATION GET PROPER IDENTIFICATION ON EACH

DOES SUPPLIERS APPROVE DEVIATIONS/WAIVERS FROM THEIR SUB-SUPPLIERS?

Potential 21 0%

6. PART APPROVAL
6.1) PRODUCT APPROVAL PROCESS - DOES THE SUPPLIER FOLLOW

AN APPROVAL PROCESS RECOGNIZED BY THE CUSTOMER?

6.2) ENGINEERING SPECIFICATIONS-DOES SUPPLIER HAVE A PROCESS TO

ASSURE THE TIMELY REVIEW, DISTRIBUTION, IMPLEMENTATION

OF CUST. ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION

DOES THE SUPPLIER RECORD WHEN CHANGES ARE IMPLEMENTED IN PRODUCTION

6.3) MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES-

IS THERE EVIDENCE TO SHOW THAT THE SUPPLIER PERFORMS CAP STUDIES

ON ALL MANUFACTURING PROCESSES?

HAS THE SUPPLIER MAINTAINED SAID CAP STUDY RESULTS?

ARE CONTROL PLANS FOLLOWED AND ACCURATE ?

ARE CAP STUDIES DONE AFTER ANY/ALL PRODUCT / PROCESS CHANGES?

RECORDS AVAILABLE SHOWING EFFECTIVE DATES OF PROCESS CHANGES?

6.4) MSA-HAS THERE BEEN STATISTICAL STUDIES COMPLETED FOR I.M.T.E.?

6.5) CALIBRATION/VERIFICATION RECORDS EXIST FOR ALL IMTE

INCLUDING EMPLOYEE AND CUSTOMER OWNED?

ARE ALL THE REQUIREMENTS AS SEEN IN 6.5 OF MAQMSR?

6.6) CHANGE CONTROL- HAS THE SUPPLIER A PROCESS TO CONTROL AND

REACT TO CHANGES TO PRODUCT REALIZATION

6.7) CHANGE CONTROL NOTIFICATION-IS THERE EVIDENCE THAT THE

SUPPLIER CONTACTS THE CUSTOMER WHENEVER THERE IS A CHANGE LIKE

Potential 39 Err:509
7. MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY
7.1) PROCESS MONITORING-SUPPLIER TOP MANAGEMENT REVIEW
PRODUCT REALIZATION TO ASSURE THEIR EFFECTIVENESS AND EFFICIENCY?
7.2) QUALITY OBJECTIVES AND QUALITY POLICY RELATE AND PROPERLY

7.3) SUPPLIER MANAGEMENT CONTACTED WHENEVER PROCESS OR

PRODUCT DOES NOT CONFORM?

HAS THE SUPPLIER IDENTIFIED WHO CAN STOP PRODUCTION ?

DOES THE SUPPLIER HAVE PERSONNEL ON ALL SHIFTS THAT ENSURE

CONFORMITY TO PRODUCT REQUIREMENTS?

7.4) HAS SUPPLIER DELEGATED RESPONSIBILITY AND AUTHORITY
TO SOMEONE TO ENSURE CUSTOMER REQUIREMENTS ARE ADDRESSED?
7.5) QMS REVIEWS AT A MINIMUM INCLUDE QUALITY OBJECTIVES

AND CUSTOMER SATISFACTION WITH PRODUCT SUPPLIED?

7.5.1) DOES MANAGEMENT REVIEW HAVE AN INPUT OF POTENTIAL AND

7.5.2) DOES THE SUPPLIER HAVE ROBUST CONTINGENCY PLANS?

ANNEX - DOES THE SUPPLIER CONFORM TO ALL REQUIREMENTS OF
CONTROL PLAN AS STATED IN THE ANNEX OF MAQMSR?

Potential 30 0%

Supplier can not demonstrate compliance to an existing practice.

Supplier has an incomplete or not fully implemented process.
Supplier can not demonstrate full compliance.

Supplier has a complete documented process and can

demonstrate full compliance.
Not applicable

Green
Yellow
Red