Aircraft Structures DJpeery PDF
Aircraft Structures DJpeery PDF
Aircraft Structures DJpeery PDF
Second Edition
David J. Pecry, p i .. d .
J. J. Azar, P h.D .
A IR C R A FT ST R U C T U R E S 2 o S O ^
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 H D IID 89876543
is b n n -D T -D in n k -a
Peery. David J.
Aircraft structures.
Bibliography: p.
Includes index.
1. Airframes. I. Azar, Jamal J., d;ite
II. Title
TL67I.6.P4 1982 629.134’3I 81-17196
ISBN 0-07-049196-8 AACR2
CONTENTS ’
Preface ix
v
r i CONTENTS
Appendixes
A M o m e n ts o f In ertia a n d M o h r's C ircle 409
B M a trix A lgebra 434
References 446
Index 450
PREFACE
J. J. A za r
ix
CHAPTER
ONE
STATIC ANALYSIS OF
STRUCTURES
1.1 INTRODUCTION
T h e fu ll u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f b o th th e te r m in o lo g y in s t a ti c s a n d t h e f u n d a m e n ta l
p r in c ip le s o f m e c h a n ic s is a n e s s e n tia l p r e r e q u is i te to th e a n a ly s is a n d d e s ig n o f
s tr u c t u r e s . T h e r e f o r e , th is c h a p t e r is d e v o t e d t o th e p r e s e n t a ti o n a n d th e a p p li
c a t i o n o f th e s e f u n d a m e n ta ls .
A n y d e f o r m a b l e s o lid b o d y w h ic h is c a p a b l e o f c a r r y in g l o a d s a n d t r a n s m it ti n g
th e s e l o a d s t o o t h e r p a r ts o r th e b o d y is r e fe rr e d to a s a structural system. T h e
c o n s t it u e n t s o f s u c h s y s te m s a r e b e a m s , p l a te s , s h e lls , o r a c o m b i n a t i o n o f th e
th re e .
Bar elements , s u c h a s s h o w n in F ig . 1.1, a r e o n e - d im e n s io n a l s t r u c t u r a l m e m
b e rs w h ic h a r e c a p a b le o f c a r r y in g a n d t r a n s m i t t i n g b e n d in g , s h e a r in g , t o r s io n a l,
a n d a x ia l l o a d s o r a c o m b in a t io n o f a ll f o u r.
B a r s w h ic h a r c c a p a b lc o f c a r r y in g o n ly a x ia l lo a d s a r e r e fe rr e d to a s axial
rods o r two-force m e m b e r s . S t r u c tu r a l s y s te m s c o n s tr u c te d e n tir e ly o u t o f a x ia l
r o d s a r c c a lle d trusses a n d f r e q u e n tly a r e u s e d in m a n y a t m o s p h e r i c , s e a , a n d
l a n d - b a s e d s t r u c t u r e s , s in c e s im p le t e n s io n o r c o m p r e s s io n m e m b e r s a r e u s u a lly
th e lig h te s t f o r t r a n s m i tt i n g fo rc e s.
Plate elements, s u c h a s s h o w n in F ig . 1.2, a r e tw o - d im e n s io n a l e x te n s io n s o f
b a r e le m e n ts . P l a t e s m a d e t o c a r r y o n ly in - p la n e a x ia l lo a d s a r e c a lle d mem-
1
2 AIHCRAI-T STRUCTURKS
(«)
1*': Di.slribufed
r
(*)
Figure 1 3 Concentrated and distributed loads. (<i) Actual loads: (/>) idealised loads; (r) wing pressure
load.
\ K
N \ V
\ \ N
I
1 ^ kt -
\ \J
\
id)
(r)
Figure 1*5 S upport types;, (n) Hinge support; {/>) hinge-roller support; (c) fixed support; (</) fixed-roller
support.
ZFi = 0
- ., n (i= x ,y ,z) (1 .1)
IM j = 0
ZFi = 0
( 1.2)
£ M, = 0
f , + F 2 + F3 = 3
F , + F 2 + 2F y = 4
2 F, + 2F 2 + 3 F 3 = 7
■1 1 1
Fi = ”3”
1 1 2 f2 = 4
2 2 3_ F}_ = _7_
1.6 S T A T I C A L L Y D E T E R M I N A T E A N D
IN D E T E R M IN A T E S T R U C T U R E S
stru ctu re. T h is is stu d ied in d etail in late r ch ap te rs. E x tern al reactio n s, in te rn a l
loads, or a co m b in a tio n o f b o th m ay cause a stru c tu ra l system to be sta tic a lly
re d u n d a n t. T h e n u m b e r o f red u n d an cies in a stru c tu re is g o v ern ed by th e n u m b e r
o f external reactions a n d /o r th e n u m b e r o f m em b ers th a t m ay be ta k e n o u t
w ith o u t th e stability o f the stru c tu re b eing affected. F o r exam ple, in Fig. 1.6a if
m em ber 1-3 a n d /o r reactio n R l x is rem o v ed , th en th e stru c tu re b eco m es s ta ti
cally d ete rm in a te an d m a in ta in s its stab ility . Likew ise, in Fig. 1.6b if m em b e rs
2 -4 and 2 -6 an d e ith e r re a c tio n R 2y. o r R 3y are rem oved, th e n th e s tru c tu re
bccom es d eterm in ate a n d stable. If, o n the o th e r h an d , ad d itio n a l m em b ers su ch
as 3 -5 a n d 1-5 are rem oved, th en the s tru c tu re becom es a m ec h a n ism o r u n
stable. M echanism s c a n n o t resist lo ad s a n d th erefo re a re n o t used as stru c tu ra l
system s.
1.7 APPLICATIONS
M jjiirc 1.7
F o r the pulley
im 7 = o (+ r v )
1 0 0 0 x 2 - 27 = 0
T = 10001b
Z F y = 0 ( -+->)
« s,
\ \ \ V \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \W \ \ \ \ ^ . \ \ \ ST*
lify
A ,
F 7 x - 1000 = 0
F7v= 1 0 0 0 lb
XF, = 0( + T)
F 7>. - 1000 = 0
F 7j, = 1000 lb
F o r m em b er 3-6-7,
IA f3 = 0 ( + ^ )
, 1000 x 7 - 2 .4 F 4 = 0
F* = 2915 lb
E F , = 0 ( *>)
F , t + 2915 co s 36.9° - 1000 = 0
F 3 x = - 1 3 3 5 lb
I F ,. = 0 ( + T)
F i y = - 7 5 0 lb
Since th e m a g n itu d e s o f F 3x an d F 3). c a m e to b e n egative, the assu m ed d irec
tion m u st be reversed. A c o m m o n p ra c tic e is to cro ss o u t (ra th e r th a n erase)
the orig in al arrow s.
F o r m em b er 2-3-4-5,
ZMS= 0 ( + r> )
1335 x 5 — 2915 x 2 c o s 36.9° — 4 F ] = 0
F , = 500 lb
2 F X= 0 ( ±*)
F Sx - 1250 lb
Z F , = 0 ( + T)
F s, = 1433 lb
N ow a ll in te rn a l lo a d s h a v e been o b ta in e d w i t h o u t th e u s e o f t h e e n tir e
s t r u c t u r e a s a f re e b o d y . T h e s o l u t i o n is c h e c k e d b y a p p ly i n g t h e th r e e
10 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
Z F* = 0 ( ± .)
ZF, = 0 ( + T)
— 0 ( + (~v )
£M 4 = 0 (+ o - )
2000 x 10 + 4000 x 10 + 1000 x 30 - 20R 6>. = 0
R 6f = 4500 lb
4000 lb
2000 lb © ' ■2 © 3
( N. 1000
10 in © © \ ©
- l ",
© \ ©\ 6 (Q) V
2000 - R 4x
R ix = 2000 lb
I F ,. = 0 ( + t)
R±y = 500 lb
T h e d irectio n s o f u n k n o w n forces in each m em b er are assum ed, as in
th e previous ex am ple, a n d v ecto rs a re ch an g ed on the skctch w hen they
a re found to be negative. (Sec F ig. 1.10.)
IF , = 0 ( Hr )
F 2 - 2000 = 0
2000
F 2 = 2000 lb
IF ,- = 0 ( + t)
500
500 - F , = 0
F , = 500 lb
Isolating jo in t 1 gives
I F ,. = 0 ( + T)
F 4 = 707 lb
IF , = 0( + ± 0
2000 + 707 cos 45° - F , = 0
F 3 = 2500 lb
4000
2000
1000
2000
4000 lb
20001b 1 2 3
1000 lb
2000 lb
500 lb 4500 lb
Figure l.II
ZF, = 0( + T) 707
707 sin 45° - F s = 0
200C
F s = 500 lb
= 0 ( + T)
500 - F s = 0
F s = 500 lb
E x am p le 1.3 A nalyze th e stru c tu ra l system sh o w n in Fig. 1.12.
T h ese stru ctu re s usually a re classified as trusses, since th e a n aly sis is sim ilar
to th a t used for trusses. As sh o w n in Fig. 1.12, m em b ers 1-2 a n d 2-3 a re not
axial ro d s, and se p a ra te free-body d ia g ra m s fo r th ese m em b ers, a s sh o w n in
Fig. 1.13a and b, are req u ired . Since each of th ese m em b ers h as fo u r u n
k n o w n reactions, th e e q u a tio n s o f sta tic eq u ilib riu m a re n o t sufficient to find
all fo u r unknow ns. It is possible, th o u g h , to find th e vertical reactio n s
Ri>- — R-zr = = 100 lb a n d to o b ta in the re la tio n s R , x = R 2x and
R 2,x = R i x from th e eq u a tio n s o f eq u ilib riu m .
W hen the u n k n o w n re a ctio n s o b ta in e d from m em b ers 1-2 an d 2-3 are
ap p lied to the rem ain in g p a rt o f th e stru c tu re as a free b o d y (Fig. 1.13b), it is
a p p a re n t th at the rest o f th e an aly sis is sim ilar to th a t o f th e prev io u s
exam ples. All m em b ers ex cep t 1-2 a n d 2-3 m ay n o w be designed a s sim ple
te n sio n o r com p ressio n m em bers. T h e h o riz o n ta l m em b ers (1-2 a n d 2-3) m ust
be designed for b en d in g c o m b in ed w ith axial a n d sh e a r loads.
QX = Q cos a
Qx = Q cos P
Q2 = Q cos y (1.3)
10 lb /in 10 lb/in
Kl'x '<x>
— — ►< >"•------
Figure 1.13
H ere a, /?, a n d y a re the angles betw een th e .x, y, a n d z axes a n d the line o f
a c tio n o f th e force v ecto r Q, respectively.
T h u s, from Fig. 1.15ft, u tilizing E q. (1.3), w e have
Tax = Ta cos a = TA { ^ ) = 0 .6 7^
TAZ = T j COS y = Ta (3 5 ) = 0
In the free-b o d y d ia g ram for th e en tire stru c tu re, show n in Fig. 1.15a,
th ere a re six u n k n o w n reactio n forces. T h e six e q u a tio n s o f sta tic eq u ilib riu m
a re ju s t sufficient to d eterm in e th ese u n k n o w n forces. T a k in g m o m e n ts a b o u t
an ax is th ro u g h p o in ts A a n d B gives
F c = 6000 lb
u iv ro ij
Figure !.I4
T h e t o r s i o n a l m o m e n t TA m a y b e f o u n d b y t a k i n g m o m e n t s a b o u t lin e
CM. N o t e t h a t a ll u n k n o w n f o r c e s a c t t h r o u g h th is lin e .
X M a0 = 1 0 0 0 x 4 .8 ~ T a = 0
T a = 4 8 0 0 in ■ lb
16 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
X M o;f = 2880 - 4 0 F az = 0
F ax = 72 lb
T h e su b s c rip t “ 0X” designates a n ax is th ro u g h p o in t 0 in th e ,v d irection.
F B = 6820 lb
I F * = F ax - 6820 x 0.557 = 0
F ax = 3800 lb
F AY = 4270 lb
x 20 + 3840 = 0
Figure 1*16
STATIC ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURES 17
0.707611 - I 99.10
' ' V lb
li
= 9.930 lb 9440 lb HII = 14,050 Ib
0.555 CC. 6300 lb IB
0.707811 {1 7 -<*3«K)Ih lb
«-V/J3U lb '
"L 5190 lb
"L 51^0 Ib
1 l b 19,300 lb
fa) (/>)
41.720 in-lb
19,7901b vvCr'
4740 lb
In = 6 1 1 5 Ib C
r Cb
47,7 20 in:l*lli
•lb j lA^l 9440 lb
19,7901b (i300 lb
Figure 1.17
T h e D c o m p o n e n t is
20,000 sin 15” = 5190 lb
ta n - 1 i f = 33.7°
18 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
Z M EV = 51§0 x 8 -T ( = 0
Te = 41,720 in • lb
B H = 14,050 lb
0.707B H = 9930 lb
CG = 11,350 lb
0.555C G = 6300 lb
0.832C G = 9440 lb
E v = 19,700 lb
= E , - 6300 = 0
Es = 6300 lb
Z F d = - 5 1 9 0 + 9930 - £,, = 0 *
E< = 4 7 4 0 lb
T h e h o riz o n ta l m e m b e r I J is now co n sid ered a s a free body. T h e forces
o b ta in e d abo v e a re ap p lie d to this m em ber, as sh o w n in Fig. 1.17c a n d d, a n d
th e five u n k n o w n re ac tio n s are o b ta in e d as follow s:
I F , = /, = 0
J v = 12,100 lb
/ „ = 17,130 lb
STATIC ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURE 19
J d = - 1 3 7 5 lb
S F j = 4740 + 1375 - I d = 0
/ j = 6 l ! 5 lb
ZFS= 0
c c
If’) (r)
Figure 1.18
20 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
I . M a = - 16 x 180 x 90 + 100G. = 0
Gz = 2590 lb
Gr 2590
1 0 0 “ 60
G / = 4320 lb
= 16 x 180 — 2590 — A . = 0
A s = 290 lb
0'z = 2590 lb
1
, ^
290 1b G r =
c
VC) / 4320 lb
s'
/
s
(o)
4 4 4 4S if
J T ' 4 4 4 .,
(*)
10801b
vertical forces a t B an d E m ay be o b ta in e d :
SM 8 = -4 x 180 x 90 + 1 0 0 £ j = 0
E . = 648 lb
Ex Ey 648
30 “ 100 “ 60
E x = 324 lb E„ = 1080 lb
E F . = 4 x 180 - 648 - B z = 0
Br = 72 lb
PROBLEMS
1.1 A 5000-lb airplane is in a steady glide wilh Ihc flight palh al an angle 0 below Ihe huri/on!:il (see
Mg. I’ I.l). The drag force in the dircclion or the llight palh is 750 lb. Kind the lift force L normal to
the flight path and the angle 0.
1.2 A jet-propelled airplane in steady flight has forces acting as shown in l-'ig. P I.2. l'ind the jet
thrust T. lift L, and the lail load P.
I P
— 150 in — -*
6 in-
FT C ? 1 2 i00 lb
10 in
40,000 in-lb
8000 lb Figure P I .2
2 2 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
1.3 A wind-tunnel model of an airplane wing is suspended as shown in l'ig. P I.3 and PI.4. Find the
toads in members 8, C, and £ if the forces at A are L = 43.8 i b , I) - 3.42 lb, and M = -2 0 .6 in • lb
1.4 For (he load of Prob. 1.3, find the forces I.. D, and M at a point A if the measured forces are
S = 40.2, C = 4.16, and £ = 3.74 Ib.
B C
1.5 Find the forces at points A and R of the landing gear shown in Fig. PL5.
Figure P I .5
1.6 Find the forces at points A, /?, and C of (he structure of the braced-wing monoplane sh('\vr. in
F it PI.6 .
Figure P I.6
1.7 Find the forces I' and M at the cut cross section of the beam shown in Fig. P I.7.
STATIC ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURES 2 3
200 lb
— 30 in - • 20 in-
10 Ib/in
i n i ili
4000 ( M
in-lb I
1.8 Find the internal loads in all members of the truss structure shown in Fig. P I.8.
10 in
(a) (h)
1000 lb 2000 H-
Figure P t.8
1.9 Find the internal loads on all members of the fuselage truss structure shown in Fig. P I.9.
Figure P1.9
1.10 All members o f the structure shown in Fig. P I. 10 are two-force members, except m ember ABC.
Find the reactions on member ABC and the loads in o ther members of the structure.
F ig ure P1.10
1.11 The bunding m om ents about the x and i axes in a plane perpendicular lo the spanwise axis or a
wing are 400,000 and 100,000 in-lb, as shown in Fig. P I.II, Find the bending moments about the
.v, and 2 , axes which are in the same plane but rotated 10" counterclockwise.
Figure P I.1 1
1.12 The main beam o f the wing shown in Fig. P I .12 has a swcephack angle of 30°. Firsl the
moments of 300,000 and 180,000 in ■lb are com puted about the x and y axes which are parallel and
perpendicular to the centerline of the airplane. Find the m om ents about the x' and y' axes.
1.13 Find the forces acting on all members of the nose-wheel structure shown in Fig. P1.13. Assume
the V axis is parallel lo the oleo strpt.
A. C
Figure P I .13
STATIC ANALYSIS Oh STRUCTURES Z3
1.14 Analyze ihe landing gear structure of Example 1.5 for a 15,000-lb load up parallel to the V axis
and a 5000-lb load aft parallel to the D axis. The loads are applied at the sam e point of the axle as the
ioad in Example 1.5.
1.15 Write a com puter program to calculate the reactions of the beam structure shown in Fig. P I.15.
I I I I
L x~*-
Figure P1.15
1.16 Write a com puter program to calculate the internal shear and bending moments at every station
of the cantilevered wing show n in Fig. P I .16. Assume the center of pressure is at 25 percent of the
chord length measured from the .x axis.
Figure P I .16
CHA PTER
TWO
FLIGHT-VEHICLE IMPOSED LOADS
2.1 INTRODUCTION
Before the final selection o f m em ber sizes o n flight vehicles can be m ade, all lo ad
c o n d itio n s im posed o n th e stru c tu re m u st b e know n. T h e lo ad co n d itio n s are
th o se w hich a re e n co u n te red b o th in flight a n d on th e g ro u n d . Since it is im pos
sible to investigate every lo ad in g co n d itio n w hich a flight vehicle m ight en c o u n te r
in its service lifetim e, it is n o rm al p ractice to select o n ly th o se c o n d itio n s th a t will
be critical for every s tru c tu ra l m em b er o f th e vehicle. T h ese co n d itio n s usually
a re d eterm in ed from p a st investig atio n a n d ex p erien ce a n d a re definitely specified
by the licensing o r p ro c u rin g agencies.
A lth o u g h the c a lc u la tio n s of lo ad s im p o sed o n flight-vehicle stru c tu re s a re
th e p rim e resp o n sib ility o f a special g ro u p in an engifiSeririg o rg a n iz a tio n called
th e lo a d s g ro u p , a basic general ov erall k n o w led g e o f th e lo ad s o n vehicles is
essential to stress an aly sts. T herefore, in I his c h a p te r we p resen t the fu n d am en tals
a n d term in o lo g y p e rta in in g to flight-vehicle loads.
E very flight vehicle is d esigned to safely c a rry o u t specific m issions. T his results in
a w ide v ariety o f vehicles relative lo size, co n fig u ratio n , a n d perform ance. C o m
m ercial tra n s p o rt a irc ra ft a re specifically d esigned to tra n s p o rt passengers from
one a irp o rt to a n o th e r. T hese types o f a ircraft a rc never subjected to violent
in tentional m aneu v e rs. M ilitary aircraft, how ever, used in fighter o r d iv e-b o m b er
o p eratio n s, a re d esigned to resist v io len t m an euv e rs. T h e design co n d itio n s u
26
FLIGHT-VEHICLE IMPOSED LOADS 2 7
u ltim a te lo a d
FS = ^ ——
lim it lo a d
G enerally, a fac to r o f safety w hich varies from 1.25 for m issile stru c tu re s to 1.5 for
aircraft stru c tu re s is used in p ractically every design b ecau se o f the uncertainties
involving
(<■) NIIAA
Figure 2.1
FLIGHT-VEHICLE IMPOSED LOADS 2 9
stallin g angle o f a tta c k for steady flow co n d itio n s. T h e a ssu m p tio n used in the
P H A A c o n d itio n — th e m axim um lift coefficient m o m e n ta rily exceeds th a t for
stead y (low— is seld o m used because it is im p ro b a b le th a t negative m an eu v ers
will be en tered suddenly. T h e w ing b en d in g m o m e n ts in th e negative high angle
o f a tta c k c o n d itio n p ro d u c e the highest co m p ressive stresses in the lo w er fo rw ard
region o f th e w ing cro ss section an d th e h ig h est tensile stresses in the u p p e r aft
regio n o f th e w ing cro ss section. T h e line o f a c tio n o f th e re su lta n t force R is
fa rth e r aft th a n fo r a n y o th e r negative flight a ttitu d e , a n d it will p ro b a b ly p ro
d u ce Ihe g reatest b alan c in g u pload on Ihc h o riz o n ta l tail fo r an y neg ativ e flight
a ttitu d e.
T h e negative low angle of a tta c k (N L A A ) c o n d itio n , show n in Fig. 2Ad,
o ccurs al the divin g -sp eed lim it o f the a irp lan e . T h is c o n d itio n m ay o cc u r in an
in te n tio n a l m an e u v e r p ro d u c in g a neg ativ e lo a d fa c to r o r in a n egative g ust
co n d itio n . T h e aft lo a d C is a m axim um fo r an y n egativ e flight a ttitu d e , the
com pressive b en d in g stresses have a m ax im u m value in th e low er aft region of
the w ing cross sectio n , a n d th e tensile b en d in g stresses h a v e a maxim.um value in
the u p p er fo rw ard reg io n o f the w ing cro ss section. T h e resu lta n t force R is
fa rth e r forw ard th a n in an y o th e r flight a ttitu d e , a n d th e d o w n lo ad o n the h o r
izo n tal tail will p ro b a b ly be larg er th a n in an y o th e r n eg ativ e flight a ttitu d e .
In su m m ary , o n e o f the fo u r basic sy m m etrical flight co n d itio n s is critical for
th e design o f a lm o st every p a rt o f th e a irp la n e stru c tu re . Xn th e stress analy sis o f a
c.omiCflXianaLwin g, it is necessary to investig a te each c ro ss section for e a ch o f the
fo u r CQ-adbUans^ T h e n each strin g er o r spaFTTangeT is d esig n ed for th e m ax im u m
tension an d the m ax im u m co m p ressio n o b tain ed in a n y o f the co n d itio n s. T he
p ro b a b le critical c o n d itio n s for each reg io n o f th e cro ss section are show n in
Fig. 2.2.
S om e specificatio n s req u ire th e in v estig atio n o f a d d itio n a l co n d itio n s o f
m edium -high an g le o f a tta c k an d m ed iu m -lo w an g le o f a tta c k w hich m ay be
critical for strin g e rs m id w ay betw een th e sp a rs, b u t u su ally these c o n d itio n s are
n o t co n sid ered o f sufficient im p o rta n c e to ju stify th e a d d itio n a l w o rk re q u ire d for
the analysis. T h e w ing, o f course, m u st b e stro n g en o u g h to resist lo ad s a t
m edium angles o f a tta c k , b u t n o rm ally th e w in g will h av e a d e q u a te stre n g th if it
m eets the req u irem e n ts for th e four lim itin g co n d itio n s.
/
Figure 2.2
FLIGHT-VEHICLE IMPOSED LOADS 31
p itch in g -m o n ien t force d istrib u tio n s for th e co m p lete a irc ra ft w ith th e h o riz o n ta l
tail rem oved, th r o u g h th e ran g e o f angles o f a tta c k from th e negativ e stallin g
angle lo th e p ositiv e stallin g angle. W hile these d a ta can b e calc u lated accu rately
for a w ing w ith a co n v en tio n a l airfoil section, sim ilar d a ta fo r th e c o m b in a tio n o f
the w ing a n d fuselage o r th e w ing, fuselage, a n d nacelles a re m o re difficult to
ca lc u la te a c c u ra te ly from p u b lish ed in fo rm atio n b ecau se o f th e u n c erta in effects
o f th e a e ro d y n a m ic in terferen ce o f v ario u s c o m p o n en ts. It is th erefore d esirab le
to o b ta in w ind tu n n e l d a ta o n a m odel o f th e c o m p lete a irp la n e less h o riz o n ta l
tail. It is often necessary, o f co u rse, to calc u late th ese d a ta from pub lish ed in fo r
m a tio n in o rd e r to o b ta in a p p ro x im a te a ir lo a d s for p re lim in a ry design pu rp o ses.
W ind tu n n el tests o f a m odel o f the co m p lete airp la n e w ith the h o riz o n tal tail
rem oved p ro v id e v alu es o f th e lift, d rag , a n d p itc h in g m o m e n t fo r all angles o f
atta c k . T h en c o m p o n e n ts o f th e lift and d ra g forces w ith respect to a irp lan e
reference axes a re d eterm in ed . T h e aircraft reference axes m ay be ch o sen as
sh ow n in Fig. 2.3. T h e force co m p o n e n ts a re Cz q S a n d Cx q S a lo n g these axes,
w here q = p V 2/ 2 is th e d y n a m ic p ressu re a n d S is th e su rface w ing area. T h e
n o n d im en sio n al force coefficients C . an d C x a re o b ta in e d b y p ro jectin g th e lift
a n d d ra g coefficients, respectively, for the a irp la n e less h o riz o n ta l tail a lo n g the
reference axes by th e follow ing e q u a tio n s:
or C, = f C m_ (2.3)
‘-t
w here C, is a dim ensionless fail force coefficient expressed in term s o f th e w ing
area a n d L, is th e d ista n c e from th e a irp la n e ’s c e n te r o f g rav ity to the re su lta n t
a ir lo ad o n the h o riz o n ta l tail, as sh o w n in Fig. 2.3. Since th e pressure d is
trib u tio n on the h o riz o n ta l tail varies ac c o rd in g to the a ttitu d e o f the airp lan e, L,
theo retically varies fo r different lo ad in g co n d itio n s. T h is v aria tio n is n o t g reat,
a n d it is c u sto m a ry to assum e L, c o n ta n t, b y using a co n serv ativ e forw ard p o s
ition o f th e cen ter o f p ressu re on the h o riz o n ta l tail. T h e to ta l aero d y n am ic force
on the a irp la n e in th e z direction, C.a qS, is eq u al to th e su m o f th e force C 2 q S o n
the a irp la n e less tail a n d th e b alancing tail lo a d C ,q S:
Cz. q S = C z q S + C ,q S
or C ., = C t + C, (2.4)
F = ma (2.5)
elem ent m oves in o n ly one p lan e an d all elem en ts m ove in p arallel planes. T his
type of m o tio n is called plane motion, an d it occu rs, for ex am p le, w hen a vehicle is
p itching an d yet h a s no ro llin g o r y aw ing m o tio n . All elem en ts o f th e vehicle
m ove in p lanes p arallel to the plane o f sy m m etry. A ny ty p e o f p lan e m o tio n can
be considered as a ro ta tio n a b o u t som e in s ta n ta n e o u s axis p e rp en d icu lar to the
planes o f m o tio n , an d the follow ing e q u a tio n s for in e rtia forces are derived on the
assu m p tio n th a t th e rigid b o d y is ro ta tin g a b o u t an in sta n ta n e o u s axis p erp en
dicular to a plane o f sym m etry o f the body. T h e in e rtia forces o b ta in e d m ay be
used for the p itch in g m o tio n of a vehicle, b u t w hen they a re utilized for rolling or
yaw ing m o tio n s, it is necessary to first o b ta in th e p rin cip al axes a n d m o m en ts of
inertia o f th e vehicle.
T h e rigid m ass sh o w n in Fig. 2.5 is ro ta tin g a b o u t p o in t O w ith a c o n sta n t t
an g u lar velocity o>. T h e acceleratio n o f a n y p o in t a d istan c e r from the c e n ter of
ro ta tio n is w 2r an d is directed to w ard th e c e n te r o f ro ta tio n . T h e in ertia force
acting on an elem en t o f m ass d M is th e p ro d u c t of th e m ass an d the acceleration,
or io2r d M , an d is directed aw ay from th e axis o f ro ta tio n . T h is in ertia force has
co m p o n en ts u>2x d M parallel to the x axis a n d a>2y d M p arallel to the y axis. If
the x axis is chosen th ro u g h the cen ter o f g ra v ity C, the forces a re simplified. T h e
resu ltan t in ertia force in th e y d irection for th e e n tire b o d y is fo u n d as follow s:
Fy = o)2y d M = co2 y dM = 0
(2.7)
z F ig u re 2.5
I
3 6 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
= J ay dM = a j dM = 0
F , = Jo x < fM = a j dM = ax M (2 .8 )
To ar2 d M = a r1 d M — a I 0 (2.9)
l0 = M x2 + JC ( 2. 10)
r2 d M
By su b s titu tin g th e v alu e o f I Q from F.q. (2.10) in F.q. (2.9), th e follow ing ex
pression for the in ertia to rq u e is o b ta in e d :
T0 = M x 2a + I col (2.11)
Figure 2.6
FLIGHT-VEHICLE IMPOSED LOADS 3 7
or n= 1 + - (2 . 1 2 )
9
T h e co m b in ed in ertia an d grav ity forces a re co n sid ered in the analysis in th e
sam e m a n n e r as w eights w hich are m ultip lied b y th e lo a d fa c to r n.
In th e case o f an a irp la n e in flight w ith n o h o riz o n ta l acceleratio n , as sh o w n
in Fig. 2.9, th e eng in e th ru st is equal to th e a irp la n e d ra g , a n d the h o rizo n tal
3 8 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
c o m p o n e n ts o f th e in e rtia and g rav ity forces arc zero. T h e w eight a n d the in ertia
force on the a irp la n e act d o w n an d will be eq u al to th e lift. T he a irp la n e lift L is
the re su ltan t o f th e w ing a n d tail lift forces. T h e lo ad fac to r is defined as follow s:
t o a d fra c t o r = •—lift
L — -
w e ig h t
or « = -£ (2 .1 3 )
L = nW = W + W -
(J
a
or n = 1 4- -
9
w hich c o rre sp o n d s to Eq. (2.12).
F lig h t vehicles freq u en tly have h o riz o n ta l ac c ele ra tio n as well as vertical
acceleration. T h e a irp lan e show n in Fig. 2.10 is being accelerated fo rw ard , since
the engine th ru st T is g rea ter th a n th e a irp la n e d ra g D. E v ery elem ent of m ass in
th e airp la n e is th u s u n d e r th e a c tio n o f a h o riz o n tal in e rtia force eq u a l to the
p ro d u c t o f its m ass an d th e h o riz o n ta l acceleratio n . It is also convejrifent to
c o n sid er the h o riz o n ta l in ertia loads as eq u al lo the p ro d u c t o f a lo ad fa c to r nx
Figure 2.9
FLIGHT-VEHICLE IMPOSED LOADS 3 9
c W
T
I »'
Figure 2.10
„x W = — W = T - D
(I
T - D
or (2.14)
nw = w cos 0 + w —
&
or n = cos 0 + (2.15)
g
F r o m s u m m a t i o n o f a ll fo rc e s a l o n g th e z a x is ,
(2.16)
Figure 2.11
4 0 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
or
W
w hich co rre sp o n d s w ith th e value used in Eq. (2.13) fo r a level a ttitu d e o f th e
airplane.
T he th ru st lo a d facto r for th e c o n d itio n sh o w n in Fig. 2.11 is also sim ilar to
th a t o b ta in e d fo r th e a irp la n e in level a ttitu d e . Since th e th ru s t a n d d ra g forces
m u st be in eq u ilib riu m w ith th e c o m p o n e n ts o f w eight a n d inertia forces a lo n g
th e x axes, th e th r u s t lo ad fa c to r is o b ta in e d a s follow s:
W
n W — — a — W sin 0 = T — D
9
T -D
or
W
T h is value is th e sam e a s th a t o b tain ed in Eq. (2.14) for a level a ttitu d e o f th e
airplane.
In the case o f th e a irp la n e lan d in g as sh o w n in F ig. 2.12, th e lan d in g lo a d
fac to r is defined as th e vertical g ro u n d reactio n d iv id ed b y th e a irp lan e w eight.
T h e lo a d facto r in th e h o riz o n ta l directio n is sim ilarly defined as the h o riz o n ta l
g ro u n d reactio n divided by th e a irp la n e w eight:
n. = (2.17)
and (2.18)
Figure 2.12
FLIGHT-VEHICLE IMPOSED LOADS 41
C .aqS = nw
or n = C --Ps
2 W v- 2 (r2 .2-m
0 )
Aa = (2 .2 1 )
P= (2 -2 2 )
Aa ■
AQ. = ^ (2.23)
Chord line
Figure 2.14
44 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
* pSPKUV
or n=~ w (2-24)
w here p = s ta n d a rd sea-level a ir density, 0.002378 slu g /ft 3
S = w ing are a , ft 2
P = slo p e o f th e c u rv e o f C .o v ersu s a, ra d
KU = effective g u st velocity, ft/s
V = in d icated airsp eed , ft/s
W = gross w eight o f a irp lan e, lb
w here p is the slope o f C , mversus a p e r degree, V is th e in d ica ted airsp eed in m iles
p er h o u r, a n d o th e r term s c o rre sp o n d to th o se in Eq. (2.24).
W h en the a irp la n e is in level flight, th e lo a d facto r is u n ity before the p lan e
strik es the gust. T h e c h a n g e in lo a d fac to r A n fro m Eq. (2.25) m u st be co m b in ed
w ith th e u n it-lo ad fa cto r in o rd e r to o b ta in th e to ta l g u st lo a d facto r:
. - . ± 0
dv U -v
" - 7 , - “° — ( 2 '2 7 )
du a0
dl
o -U -v U o
U —v a0 l
log
U V
By using th e ex p o n en tial form an d su b s titu tin g th e v alu e o f a from Eq. (2.27), the
follow ing expression for th e acceleratio n a a t lim e t is o b ta in e d :
— = e - ao,lu (2.28)
ao
Time, s
Figure 2.15
2.9 EXAMPLES
S o l u t io n
(a) F irst c o n sid e r th e en tire a irp lan e as a free body.
W
Ma = a —
a
T = 30,500 lb
R = 15,3001b
Y M cg = 20 x 15,300 - 30,500e = 0
e = 1 0 in
(b) C o n sid e r the aft section o f the fuselage as a free b o d y , as show n in Fig.
2.17. It is acted o n b y an in ertia force o f
1000
M a = -------3g = 3000 lb
9
T h e ten sio n o n section B B is found as follow s:
I F , = 30,000 - 3000 - 71 = 0
= 27,000 lb
^ 2 = 30001b
T2 = 9000 Ib
Figure 2.18
3000
M a = -------3g = 9000 lb
9
T.FX = T 2 - 9000 = 0
T2 = 9000 lb
6000
M a = -------3g = 18,000 lb
g
Z F X = 27,000 - 18,000 - 9000 = 0
v2 — i’jj = l a s
0 - (802) = 2 (—96.6)s
s = 33 ft
E xam ple 2.2 A 30,000-lb a irp la n e is sh o w n in Fig. 2.20a a t th e tim e, o f
lan d in g im pact, w hen th e g ro u n d reactio n o n each m a in w heel is 45,000 V6.
(a) If o ne w heel a n d tire weighs 500 lb, find th e co m p re ssio n C a n d bending
6000 m
T, = 27.0 0 0 ib
K, -= 630C Ib
Figure 2.19
FLIGHT-VEHICLE IMPOSED LOADS 4 9
I Ma = 60,000 lb
I
(«)
C
6 in |« »-j
M, a=
1000 lh
W, = 500 Ib il M
T
45,000 lh
(h)
Figure 2.20
S o l u t io n
(a) C o n sid erin g th e e n tire airp lan e a s a free b o d y a n d ta k in g a su m m atio n o f
vertical forces yield
M a = 60,000 lb
60,000 60,000g
Cl ~ ' M ~ 30,000 " 9
w, 500
M i a — — a — ----- 2 g = 1000 lb
9 9
T h e co m p ressio n lo ad C in the o leo s tru t is fo u n d from a su m m a tio n o f
vertical forces:
C = 43,500 lb
T h e b e n d in g m o m e n t m is found as follow s:
(b) T h e in ertia force a c tin g on the p o rtio n o f the w ing sh o w n in Fig. 2.20c is
tv, 1500
M 2 a = — a = -------2g = 3000 lb
9 9
T h e w ing sh e a r a t sectio n A A is fo u n d from a su m m a tio n of vertical
f° rCeS‘ S F j . = V - 3 0 0 0 - 1500 = 0
V = 4500 lb
T h e w ing b e n d in g m o m en t is fo u n d by ta k in g m o m e n ts a b o u t scction
AA
m K = 3000 x 120 + 1500 x 120 = 540,000 in • lb
v2 — Vq = 2 a s
0 — (12z) = 2 (—64.4 )s
s = 1 .1 2 ft
0 — 12 = — 64.4f
. f = 0.186 s
Since th e lan d in g sh o ck occurs fo r su ch a s h o rt tim e, it m ay be less
in ju rio u s to th e stru c tu re a n d less disag reeab le to th e passengers th a n
w ould a su sta in e d lo ad .
So l u t io n
(a) T h e in ertia forccs o n the en tire a irp la n e m ay be co n sid ered as h o rizo n tal
an d vertical forces M a x an d M u y , respectively, a t th e ccn tc r o f g ravity
a n d a co u p le a,, as show n in Fig. 2.21. T h ese co rre sp o n d to the in ertia
forces sho w n o n the m ass o f Fig. 2.7, since th e forccs at the center o f
g rav ity re p re se n t the p ro d u ct o f th e m ass a n d th e acceleration c o m
p o n e n ts o f the c e n te r o f gravity.
E F X = 90,000 - M a x = 0
M a x = 90,000 lb
£ F y = 270,000 - 60,000 - M a y = 0
M ay = 2 1 0 ,0 0 0 lb
I M cg = -2 7 0 ,0 0 0 x 40 - 90,000 x 100 + I c a = 0
l c a = 19,800,000 in • Ib
Mlly I
I
H ------------------ 500 in--------------------
t
11 = (>0.000 Ib /~ \
40 in
1 f s u i o i in r —
J t u
W.OflO 111 ■ 2 7 0,000 Ib
•*-----2(JU in — *- -*—40 in
Figure 2.21
90.000 90,000
M “ 60,000 9 ~ L5CJ
210.000 210,000
.9 = 3.5 g
M 60,000
400
M a x = ----- 1.5^ = 600 lb
9
0 - 12 = 1 12.7f
/ = 0.106 s
f M a y = 1400 lb
I
I
} a x M - 2050 lb Figure 2.22
FLIG HT-VEHICLE IMPOSED LOADS 5 3
s = v0 t + ? a t2
co — (o 0 — a t
w - 0 = 3.96 x 0.106
w = 0.42 ra d /s
0 1 = v)0 t + ^ a t 1
T h e vertical m o tio n o f th e nose w heel resu ltin g from this ro ta tio n , show n
in Fig. 2.23, is
s, = 0 , x = 0.0222(200) = 4.44 in
e 2 = ^ = ?— =, 0.1396 ra d
2 x 200
Since the g ro u n d re a ctio n decreases by th e ra tio o f after the
vertical accelera tio n o f th e a irp la n e becom es zero , th e a n g u la r acceler
a tio n decreases in th e sam e p ro p o rtio n , as fo u n d by e q u a tin g m o m en ts
AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
a b o u t th e c e n te r o f g ra v ity :
60,000 _
“ 2 = 270000 = ° rad/S
o j 2 — c o l = 2 a 2 0 2
co = 0.65 ra d /s
Since a t this tim e the m o tio n is ro ta tio n , w ith no vertical m o tio n o f the
cen ter o f grav ity , th e vertical velocity o f the nose wheel is found as
follow s:
V = cox
eq u ilib riu m w ith th e g rav ity force o f 60,000 lb. Since the h o rizo n tal ve
locity o f the a irp la n e an d the angle o f a tta c k a re n o t ap p re c iab ly ch an g ed
tflj — 0.0222 rad = 1.27°), the lift forces c o n tin u e to b a lan c e th e w eight o f
the airp lan e w hen th e c c n tc r o f g rav ity is being d ecelerated . In stead o f the
w eight o f 60,000 Ib sh o w n in Fig. 2.21, th ere sh o u ld be an ad d itio n a l
in ertia force o f 60,000 lb dow n a t th e c e n te r o f g ravity. T h e m o m en ts
a b o u t the c en ter o f g ra v ity an d the p itc h in g a ccclcralio n a re not ch an g ed ,
but the vertical d eceleratio n is increased. A t the end o f th e deceleration
o f the c en te r o f g rav ity , the g ro u n d re a c tio n s are a lm o st zero, since m ost
o f the airp la n e w eight is carried by th e lift o n the w ings. T h e airp la n e
then pilches fo rw ard th ro u g h the angle 0 2 , w hich a p p re c ia b ly changes
the angle o f a tta c k (02 = 0.1396 rad = 8 °). T h e w ing lift is th e n decreased,
an d m ost o f th e w eig h t is su p p o rte d by th e g ro u n d reactio n s o n th e
wheels. F o r the stru c tu ra l design o f th e airp la n e , u su ally only the lo ad s
d u rin g the initial im p a ct arc .significant.
E xam ple 2-4 C o n stru c t th e V-n d iag ram a n d d eterm in e th e w ing in tern al
load resulting from a e ro d y n a m ic forces for the a irp la n e (Fig. 2.24) w hose
wing p lanform is sh o w n .in Fig. 2.25. T he follow ing c o n d itio n s a re specified:
Figure 2.24
AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
j q-jO 2.049 j ofi 2.087 2 qqj2.085-} Qyj 2.0532 ^.972 j ^q^1.R59 Oj (total normal
|~ | | | '| | [ [ ~| ~ | ‘| ' | | force coefficient I
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 -200 220 240
f---------------------------------------- 240 in
Figure 2.25
C Za = 1.25(1.656) = 2.070
T h is c o rre sp o n d s w ith the angle o f a tta c k o f 26”, w ith in the accu racy o f the
d a ta , an d th is an g le is assum ed. T h e e q u a tio n for the cu rv c O A o f Fig. 2.13 is
Table 2.1
. a - 0, (leg Q cn c„
26 2.132 0.324 0.0400
20 1.670 0.207 0.0350
15 1.285 0.131 0.0280
10 0.900 0.076 0.0185
5 0.515 0.040 0.0070
0 0.130 0.023 -0 .0 1 0 5
-5 -0 .2 5 5 0.026 -0 .0 3 1 6
-10 -0 .6 4 0 0.049 -0 .0 5 2 5
-1 5 -1 .0 2 5 0.092 -0 .0 7 7 0
-1 7 -1 .1 8 0 0.115 -0 .0 8 6 0
FLIGHT-VEHICLE IMPOSED LOADS 57
T ab le 2.2
foun d as follow s:
pSV2
11 = 1078 = 2.078 x 0.00256 ( 2 Z - V >)
2W \8 0 0 0 J
= 0.0001.772 V 2
aSV2
n = - 1.200 = —0.0001024 F 2
„ 2.078 + 1.200
P = — = °-0763 p e r degree
iO + 1 /
Figure 2.26
5 8 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
Table 2.3
C h o rd
Slalion length Force coefficient Shear Bending momcnl
no. >; C) Vi M J I(XX)
0 240 0 0 0
1 220 50 1.859 560 5
2 200 66 1.903 1.880 29
3 ISO 73.2 1.972 3.510 83
4 160 76.4 2.035 5,310 171
5 140 79.6 2.053 7.230 296
6 120 82.8 2.077 9.250 461
7 100 86.0 2.085 11.370 667
8 80 89.2 2.095 13.580 917
9 60 92.4 2.087 15.870 1.212
to 40 95.6 2.06 18,220 1.553
11 20 98.8 2.049 20,630 1.942
12 0 102 2.02 23,090 2,379
F ro m Eq. (2.26),
= 0.00865 V
V — V 4- ~‘ ' ~1 (Y — Y)
ti _Ki 1 + 144 2 1
y
an d M , = M, , + h ± A j . {Yi , - Yi)
PROBLEMS
2.1 An airpliinc weighing 5000 Ib strikes an upward gust o f air which produces a wing lift of 25,000 Ib
(see l-ig. I’2.1). W hat tail load P is required to prevent a pitching acceleration if the dimensions are as
FLIGHT-VEHICLE IMPOSED LOADS 59
shown? W hat will be the vertical acceleration of the airplane? If this lift force acts until the airplane
obtains a vertical velocity of 20 ft/s, how much time is required?
25,000 lb
Figure P2.1
2.2 An airplane weighing 8000 lh has an upward acceleration of 3</ when landing. If the dimensions
are as shown in Fig. P2.2, whal are the wheel reactions R x and f?2? W hat time is required to
decelerate the airplane from a vertical velocity of 12 ft/s? What is the vertical compression of the
landing gear during this deceleration? What is the shear and bending m om ent on a vertical section
A A if the weight forward of this section is 2000 lb and has a ccnter of gravity 40 in from this cross
section?
M a = 2 4 ,0 0 0 lh
1
Figure P2.2
2.3 The airplane shown in Fig. P2.3 is making an arrested landing on a carrier deck. Find the load
factors /! and n x, perpendicular and parallel to the dcck, for a point at the center of gravity, a point
200 in aft of the center of gravity, and a point I(K) in forward of the ccnter of gravity. Find the relative
U' = 10,000 Ib
vertical velocity w ith which the nose wheel strikes the deck if the vertical velocity of the center of
gravity is 12 ft/s and the angular velocity is 0.5 rad/s counterclockwise for lhe position shown. The
radius of gyration for the m ass of the airplane about Ihe center of gravity is 60 in. Assume no change
in the dimensions o r loads shown.
2.4 An airplane is flying at 550 mi/h in level flight when it is suddenly pulled upward into a curved
palh of 2000-ft radius. (See Fig. P2.4.) Find Ihe load factor of the airplane.
Figure P2.4
2J.> If ihe airplane in Prob. 2.4 is given a pitching acceleration of 2 rad/s2, find its load factor,
assuming that the change in lift due to pitching may be neglectcd.
2.6 A large transport aircraft is m aking a level landing, as shown in Fig. P2.6. The gross weight of the
aircraft is 150,000 lb, and its pitching mass m oment of inertia is 50 x 10* lb • in • s2 about the center
o f gravity. The landing rear-wheel reaction is 350,000 Ib at an angle of 15" with the vertical. Deter
mine whether passenger A or B will receive the most load. Assume that each passenger weights 170 lb
and neglect the airplane lift.
Figure P2.6
FLIGHT-VEHICLE IMPOSED LOADS 61
2.7 Assume that the center of gravity of the airplane in Example 2.4 is moved forward 8 in without
changing the external aerodynam ic configuration. T he distance L, is now 208 in, and the values o f the
aerodynam ic pitching moments about the center of gravity a r e C M — 8C./86, where values of C M are
given in Table 2.1.
(a) Calculate curves for C, and C._.
(/>) Construct a l ’-n diagram , using the conditions specified in Sec. 2.7.
(c) Calculate the wing bending-momciit diagram for air loads norm al to the wing chord for the
PHAA condition.
(i/) C alcu la te the wing hciiding-im im ciit d ia g ra m fo r cliunlwi.sc a ir loads.
(<•) Calculate the air-load torsional moments about the wing’s leading edge if the leading edge is
straight and perpendicular to the plane of symmetry of the airplane. Assume the airfoil a t any section
to have an aerodynam ic ccnter at the quarter-chord point and to have a negligible pitching m oment
about this point.
2.8 Calculate the wing norm al and chordwise bending-moment diagram s for the PLAA condition for
the airplane analyzed in Sec. 2.7.
2.9 If the airplane wing of F.xamplc 2.4 weighs 4 .0lb/ft2, which is assumed distributed uniformly over
the area, calculate the wing bending moments resulting from gravity and inertia forces normal to the
wing chord for the four primary loading conditions.
CH A PTER
THREE_________________
ELASTICITY OF STRUCTURES
3.1 I N T R O D U C T I O N
3.2 STRESSES
Figure 3.2
XFx = 0
Sim ilarly,
2 h\. = 0 rrxy x + a yy y + tr.j. . + Y = 0 (3.6)
Ozx+
n
J "
\ L
X
a.
6 6 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
d ayy
zx' x ox dy
In a cy lin d rical c o o rd in a te set of axes, the e q u ilib riu m eq u a tio n s m ay be
easily derived from Fig. 3.5:
I 2$
~ <T0 0 . 0 + a rB. r H----- -- + ^zK - + © = 0 (3.9)
r r
1 <7r.
°zz, z + r °0z. e + arit r + + Z = 0 (3.10)
or, in cylindrical co o rd in a te s.
_tt. r +, A_ffrB, t>4.--------------
r~ ff8B+. R„ = 0«
r r
». 29 a rti (3 '2)
~ ^00, 0 + G r0, r + -------- - 4 - 0 = 0
S train s are n o n d im e n sio n a l q u a n tities a sso ciate d w ith th e d efo rm a tio n s (displace
m ents) o f an elem en t in a solid body u n d e r th e actio n o f ex tern a l ap p lied loads.
<10
Figure 3.5
ELASTICITY OF STRUCTURES 67
A (0.-1) O'A' - OA
S" = ~ 0 A ~ ~ OA
OA = d x
O'A' = l( d x + qx, x d x)2 + (qy, x d x )2 + (q:, x d x ) 2 ] 1' 2
T h e no rm al strain in th e .v d irection is th en
F igure 3.6
6 8 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
(3.14a)
In sim ilar m a n n er, th e linearized no rm al s tra in s in th e y a n d z directions m ay be
derived a n d are given by
= <ly. y (3.f4/i)
an d ' ezz = q . z (3.14c)
= q.r. y + qy. x
= ‘I,.-. + Q z.y
e.vx *xz
w = ^yx (3.16)
€*y <L-z
[<Q (3.17)
= [:
In cylindrical c o o rd in a te s, Eqs. (3.14) a n d (3.15) m a y be w ritte n as
<7=.o
^rr (lr. r
Qn, a Or
6(1 0 + — e =r ~ Q z, r + <?r. 2
(3.18)
r r
‘i r . O . Qo
= <1 e r0 — I" r —
r r
e xx - 9 .v, X
e yy = 1y, y
(3.19)
^xy ~ tfx . y tfy . x
e jc.\. y y ~ el x . x y y
xx ^/v. y x x
3 .6 B O U N D A R Y C O N D IT IO N S
1. Inelastic n o n lin e a r
2. E lastic n o n lin ea r
3. L in ear elastic
Figure 3.8
7 2 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
to) to
Figure 3.9 (a) Inelastic nonlinear: (h) elastic nonlinear; (f) linear elastic
J33
a 12 = "2 1 =
E„
V V
032= ~ f - = ~ f - (3.26)
Lj vv i-'-T
E ..
1 1 1
a 44 — ,, 055 — „ °6 6 —n
1
° l 1 — a 22 ~ a i3 ~ £
a 44 = fl5 5
(3 .2 7 )
a l2 ~ a 2l — (l23 ~ a 32 ~ a l i = --
E
G =
2 (1 + v)
ELASTICITY OF STRUCTURES 7 3
1 -v 0 ~<7.va
1
e vv -v 1 0 (T„ (3.28)
= E
[° ° 2 (1 + v)J <*xr_
^ X X , XX yy 0
(3.29)
A stress field {<rKXl <r,r . rr%y), such as show n in Fig. 3.10, w hich is know n in one set
of system s axes m ay be tran sfo rm ed to an y o th e r a rb itra ry set o f axes such as t]ji.
y /
a„. /
fm4-W
-f
/
/
' v
1 I i \ 1 l./l
V /
/
\
\
N^-----
mttm
— ► \
N.
7 4 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
or
3 0
a'xx
a.
to)
Figure 3.11
ELASTIC ITY OF STRUCTURES 75
— 1
' J
cos2fl s in 2fl —sin 20
JLj
,TIH sin 2fl cos2 0 sin 20 t ,,. (3.31«)
sin 20 sin 20 , ,
1—
- —-— —-— 1 — 2 cos 0
w h e r e 0 is (h e a n g l e o f r o t a t i o n a n d is p o s i ti v e in t h e c l o c k w i s e d ir e c tio n .
In co m p ac t m atrix form , Eq. (3.28) becom es
/VI. (3.316)
_________ >
In a sim ilar m a n n e r, the strain s m ay be tra n sfo rm e d as follow s:
” €* l" e*.r
i—i
i_-3
e„. (3.32)
ii
e ///(
I
.2 ' nfl_
w here (ten so r sh e a rin g strain) = 2 e ,7 (engineering sh e a rin g strain) a n d the
m atrix [ T ] is the sam e as th a t in Eq. (3.31).
PROBLEM S
3.1 Derive the com patibility equation in cylindrical coordinates for a two-dimensional state of stress.
3.2 Find the direction along which a hole may be drilled in the solid shown in Fig. P3.2 such that no
shearing stresses exist along the hole direction.
Figure P3.2
3.3 Find the maximum and minimum normal stresses and the planes on which they act for ihe block
.shown in Fig. 1*3.2. Also, determine the maximum shear stress and the plane on which it acts in
Proh. 3.Z
3.4 Derive Pq. (3.30c*).
3.5 F or a two-dimensional state of stress, show' that the stress-strain relationship is
” A « V,, s , . 0 ■
fT = St 2 S 22 0 k
0 0 ■V U -.
S44 ~ a h„ A = a ,, a 22 - a f2
3.6 Find Ihe m atrix of the stiffness constants if a new. arbitrary set of chosen axes is taken as shown
in Hg. P3.6. Assume that the stillness constants with rcspcct lo the x and y axes are as given in
Prob. 3.5.
11 Figure P3.6
3.7 A narrow cantilever beam has unit width and is loaded with a force Q, as shown in Fig. P3.7. The
deformations in the x and y directions are
= Q l* 2 + >1r - .v2)]
n = - 2 Qr.vv
y
|
s
1 1
Figure P3.7
3.8 You are given a rectangular plate wilh positive applied stresses (<T„ and n!t). What must be the
magnitude o r <rv in order for the contraction in the x direction lo be prevented? If this plate is
subjected to the positive stresses Z7,t ■ trvv. and 17^., in what direction should the plate be drawn in
order to preserve its angles during stretching?
ELASTICITY OF STRUCTURES 77
3.9 A plate of unit thickness is subjected to a set of loads l \ and Pt uniformly distributed over the
sides a and />, respectively. (See Fig. P3.9.) W hal must be the ratio o f magnitudes of P , and Pf in
order for the contraction of the plate in the x direction to be prevented?
Figure P3.9
i
CHAPTER
FOUR
BEHAVIOR A N D EVALUATION
OF VEHICLE M ATERIAL
4.1 I N T R O D U C T I O N
1. E n v iro n m en t S
2. F atig u e
3. T e m p e ra tu re
4. C o rro sio n
5. C reep
6 . S tren g th an d stiffness
7. W eight lim itatio n
8 . C o st
9. H u m an facto r
78
BEHAVIOR AND EVALUATION OF VEHICLE MATERIAL 7 9
Tensile Test
Figure 4.1 sh o w s the basic c o n fig u ratio n o f a tensile test specim en. T h e load 11 is
applied g rad u ally th ro u g h th e use o f a tensile testin g m ach in e. T h e norm al strain
€„ usually is m easu re d c ith e r by u tilizing electrical s tra in g a g e techniques o r by
m easu rin g the to ta l e lo n g a tio n <5 in an effective gage le n g th L for v ario u s values
o f the ten sio n io ad P. F o r sm all loads, th e e lo n g a tio n is a ssu m ed to be uniform
o v er the en tire gag e length /, a n d th erefo re th e n o rm a l stra in m ay be m a th e m a t
ically expressed in th e form
€" = z (41)
w here <5 a n d L a re b o th m easu red in the sam e u n its o f length. T h e c o rresp o n d in g
no rm al stress <r„ is also assu m ed to be un ifo rm ly d is trib u te d over the cross-
sectional area A o f the test specim en a n d is o b ta in e d as follow s:
(4-2)
(a)
DC
ib ) F ig u re 4.1
80 a ir c r a f t structures
o u Strain,e
a G
v *
e
Figure 4.2
(4.3)
Compression Test
T h e com pressiv e stre n g th o f m aterials is m o re difficult to identify from stress-
strain curves th a n th e c o rresp o n d in g tensile stre n g th . C o m p ressiv e failures for
m o st s tru c tu ra l designs in en gineering a p p lic a tio n s a re asso c ia te d w ith in sta b il
ities w hich a re related to yield stress ra th e r th a n u ltim a te stress. Y ield-stress
values w hich a re o b ta in e d based o n th e 0 . 2 p ercen t offset m e th o d (0 .0 0 2 -in /in
p e rm an en t stra in ) h ave been pro v ed to be relatively successful for c o rre latin g
instabilities in m o st m etals; how ever, the co rre la tio n is less satisfactory for n o n -
m etals, specifically co m p o sites. Specim en g e o m etry a n d m e an s o f su p p o rts seem
to have co n sid e ra b le clfect on co m p ressio n test results. T h e com pressive stress-
strain d ia g ra m s for m o st m aterials arc sim ilar to the tensile stress-strain curves.
Shear Test
In-p lan e sh e a r p ro p e rtie s are the m ost difficult to o b ta in a n d have the least
sta n d a rd iz e d testin g p ro ced u res of all m a jo r m ech a n ical p ro p erties. T h e design o f
a sh ear-test specim en h av in g a test sectio n su b jected to a un ifo rm shearing stress
is im possible. T h e closest p ractical a p p ro a c h is p ro b ab ly a thin-w allcd c irc u la r
cylinder lo ad ed in to rsio n , as show n in F ig. 4.3. F o r sm all displacem ents, th e
sh ear stra in is ex p ressed as
AS
8 2 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
Figure -1.3
Tr
(4.5)
F o r very thin-w allcd cy lin d rical test specim ens, Hq. (4.5) m a y be w ritten as
TRm
o* = —r ~ (4.6)
G -* (4.7)
€ = IT + 7 <j" (4.8)
Ee
i = — (4.9)
an d a = — (4.10)
T he curves expressed by F.q. (4.8) a re p lo tte d in Fig. 4.4 for v a rio u s values o f
n. A m aterial such as m ild steel, in w hich the stress re m a in s a lm o st c o n sta n t
above the yield p o in t, is rep resen ted by th e c u rv e fo r n = oo. O th e r m aterials,
with v ario u s types of stress-strain d iag ram s, m ay b e re p re se n te d by the curves for
o th e r values o f n. In o rd e r to represent the stre ss-stra in d ia g ra m s for all m aterials
by the single e q u a tio n , it is n ecessary to use the reference stress v alu e o f a, ra th e r
than the yield stress. T h e value o rrr, is o b ta in e d as sh o w n in Fig. 4.5 by d raw in g
the line a = 0.7Ee. from th e origin to the stre ss-stra in c u rv e a n d o b ta in in g th e
stress c o o rd in a te cr, or this p o in t of in tersec tio n . T h e stress <rl is a p p ro x im ately
equal to the yield stress for typical flight vehicle m ateria ls. T h e v alu e o f n m ay b e
determ ined so th a t Eq. (4.8) fits th e ex p erim en tal stre ss-stra in c u rv e in the desired
region. R o m b erg a n d O sg o o d show th a t for m o s t m a te ria ls th e v a lu e o f n m ay be
accurately d eterm in e d from th e stress Cj a n d a sim ila r stre ss tr2 o n the line
a = 0.85£e.
_ /.c
( = •-
Figure 4.4
8 4 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
4.4 FATIGUE
w ave cx cilatio n . O n ly recently clo sed -lo o p , se rv o -co n tro lled h y d ra u lic m achines
hav e b ecom e av ailab le for tru e ra n d o m lo a d in g testing. F a tig u e test d a ta usu ally
a re p resented grap h ically (Fig. 4.8) a n d th e cu rv es a re referred to as th e
allo w ab le S - N curves. T h e curves in c o n ju n c tio n w ith th e "c u m u la tiv e d a m a g e ”
conccpt form the b asis for m o st o f th e m e th o d s used in th e p red ictio n o f fatigue
life.
A m o n g th e several th eo ries p ro p o se d for fatigue-life pred ictio n , th e
P a lm g rc n -M in c r th e o ry ,2*’ because o f its sim plicity, seem s to be th e m o st w idely
used. T h e m eth o d hyp o th esizes th a t the useful life e x p en d ed m a y be expressed as
th e ra tio o f the n u m b e r o f ap p lied cycles ij/ to th e n u m b e r o f cycles Af,- to failure
a t a given c o n sta n t stress level a-,. W hen th e sum o f all th e fractio n s reaches 1,
failure sh o u ld occur. M ath em atically th is failure c riterio n is w ritte n as
= ]
i = 1 V ’ i/ <7i = co n st
I imc
diffcrcn! levels o f m ean stress. Tn fact, the th e o ry has been sh o w n to yield un-
conscrvative results in som e test case stu d ies c o n d u c te d by G a ssn e r , 2 0
K ow alew ski , 2 1 a n d C o rte n an d D o la n . 2 2
T o illu strate the use o f Eq. (4.11), co n sid er a b ra c k e t w hich su p p o rts an
electronic box in the a irc ra ft cockpit. In a typical m ission, th e b ra c k e t en co u n te rs
a stress h isto ry sp ectru m idealized as sh o w n in F ig. 4.9. T h e faligue allo w ab le of
the b rack et m aterial is given in Fig. 4.10. T h e p ro b lem is to find th e n u m b e r o f
m issions the aircraft m ay acco m p lish before th e b ra c k e t fails.
F ro m Figs. 4.9 a n d 4.10, T ab le 4.1 m ay be easily c o n stru c te d . T h erefo re, in
one m ission 0.433 p e rcen t o f the useful life o f the b ra c k e t is ex p en d ed . T h is m eans
Time, s
/V cycles to failure
M = - i log N , (4.12)
n i= i
w here n — to ta l n u m b er o f specim ens tested a t th e sam e stress level an d AT, =
n u m b er o f cycles to failure for specim en i.
T able 4.1
Hi
ij, , cycles n ,. kip s'in 7 /V,. cycles N,
200 6 y. 0
141 20 50.000 0.00282
105 10 X 0
260 14 10" 0.00026
25 22 2 x I0J 0.00125
240 4 j. 0
V 1' 0.00433
^N ,
I
8 8 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
<5 = (4.13)
[' ■]
In o rd e r to calc u la te th e n u m b e r o f cycles to failure, b a sed on so m e confidence
level, the sta n d a rd v ariab le ( is tak en as
_ log N — M
(4.14)
5
or lo g N = M + £5 (4.15)
1 61,318
2 39,695
3 62,803
4 51,039
5 83,910
6 35,631
7 96,500
= 4.76463
'['able 4.2
C Probability of survival, %
-1 .2 8 0 90.0
-1 .6 4 5 95.0
—2.330 99.0
BKHAVIOK AND KVALUATION OF VEHICLE MATERIAL 8 9
g = |~ £ (log N , - M ) 2J /2
= 0.0503
in) (M U')
1‘igure 4.11 J.ondcd mcnibcis. {</} Pure tension; {h) pure com pression; (c) pure bending.
9 0 AIRCRA1T STRUCTURES
7t 2E ! ( ht v
C om pression (buckling): a = - - —7 - ( 1 = — -) (4.18)
T /7 ( ' = 72
„ Aff
B ending: __ ^ = 2 T (4' 19^
I V -= L h t p (4.20)
Solving for th e free v ariab le t from Eqs. (4.17) th ro u g h (4.19) an d su b stitu tin g in to
Eq. (4.20) yields th e m aterial w eight req u ired to m eet each specified design c ri
terion. T h u s
W = —— (tension) (4.21)
",
l3bp ( 1 2 0 l/2
W = ------ ( j (co m p ressio n ) (4.22)
6 M b \ tl2
W = Lp ( — —j (bending) (4.23)
Vb
W ith Eqs. (4.21) to (4.23) av ailab le, weight c o m p a riso n s o f different m aterials m ay
be co n d u cte d . T h u s th e w eights o f tw o d ifferent m a te ria ls req u ired to c arry th e
axial load P m ay be readily o b tain ed from Eq. (4.21) as
I*!' _ P± (4 74 )
W2 Pz
Sim ilarly, th e ra tio o f w eights o f tw o m em bers o f tw o d ifferent m ate ria ls resisting
the sam e b en d in g m o m en t m ay be easily o b tain ed by u tilizing Eq. (4.23):
BhllAVIOK AND KVALUATION OF VEHICLE MATERIAL 91
W\ P ifE iV 3
w r k k ) «“ >
T ypical aero sp ace vehiclc s h e d m aterials a rc co m p a re d in T ab le 4.3 by
m eans o f liqs. (4.24) th ro u g h (4.26). T h e w eights o f th e v a rio u s m aterials are
co m p ared w ith the alu m in u m alloy 2024-T3. T h e w eight ra tio s for ten sio n m em
bers, show n in colum n 5. d o n o t vary g reatly fo r th e differen t m aterials. F o r
m em bers in bending, how ever, th e low er-density m a te ria ls h av e a d istin ct ad v an
tage, as show n in colu m n 6 . Sim ilarly, the lo w er-d en sity m a te ria ls have an even
g reater a d v an ta g e in co m p ressio n buckling, as in d icated in c o lu m n 7. V alues o f a
vary w ith sheet thickness, a n d those show n a re used only for co m p a riso n .
T he c o m p u tatio n s o f T ab le 4.3 in d icate th a t th e last th ree m ateria ls, having
low er densities, a re su p e rio r to th e alu m in u m alloys. H o w ev er, it is im p o rta n t to
n o te th a t m agnesium alloys a rc m ore subject to c o rro sio n th a n a lu m in u m alloys,
while w ood an d plastic m a te ria ls are less ductile. B rittle m a teria ls a re undesirable
for stru ctu res w ith n u m ero u s b olted c o n n ectio n s a n d c u to u ts w hich p ro d u ce local
high-stress co n cen tratio n s. D uctile m aterials, w hich have a larg e u n it elo n g atio n
a t th e ultim ate tensile stre n g th , will yield slightly a t p o in ts o f high local stress a n d
will th u s relieve the stress, w hereas b rittle m ate ria ls m ay fail u n d e r the sam e
conditions. Fibcr-roinforccd plastics have been used successfully for aerospace
vehicle stru ctu res as long ago as the late 1940s a n d early 1950s. In th o se days, the
m ain reinforcem ent w as glass fiber in fabric form w ith p o ly e ste r resin as the
b o n d in g agent. Since th e n a n d prim arily in th e la st few years, d ev elo p m en t o f
new h igh-m odulus fibers (such a s b o ro n , silicon carb id e , g ra p h ite , a n d beryllium )
in co m b in atio n w ith h ig h -m o d u lu s, h ig h -te m p e ra tu re -re sista n t resin s (such as
cycloaliphatic epoxies, p o ly m eric an d p o ly b en zim id azo le resins) h a s ad d ed a new
dim ension to m aterials Tor ap p lic atio n s in a e ro sp a c e a n d m a rin e - a n d land-based
structures. T hese new fibers a n d resins arc b eing co m b in ed in a unidirectio n al,
M = o tftif + t c)
M = at j- tc
or
M = a p t2 (4.27)
W = p c tc + 2pf p tc (4.28)
W = ([,c + 2 p f P ) J ^ (4 -2 9 )
P= ^~ (4-30)
2P f
By solving for t from Eq. (4.27) a n d su b stitu tin g in to E q. (4.31), th e follow ing
w eight for the sandw ich elem en t is o b ta in e d :
94 AIRCRA1T STRUCTURES
(4.33)
H encc. the ra tio o r th e w eight o f a san d w ich beam elem ent to th a t o f a solid
elem ent of the co rre sp o n d in g sandw ich face m aterial is
Ws P y /6 M J a ‘■U JV F (4.34)
„ Pc 0-01
P = — = ------- = 0.05
' 2p , 2(0.1)
F ro m Hq. (4.34)
W ,------
— = 1 .6 3 x/0 .0 5 = 0.37
w;
T h u s, the san d w ich h as only 37 percen t o f th e w eight o f a solid elem ent resisting
the sam e b en d in g m o m en t. A lso n o te th a t th e value of 0.37 is less th a n a n y o f the
o th e r values in co lu m n 6 of T a b le 4.3.
In th e p reced in g discu ssio n , it w as assu m ed th a t th e p ro p o rtio n s for the
sandw ich clem ent w ere lim ited only by th eo retical c o n sid eratio n s. In a c tu a l stru c
tures, p ractical c o n sid e ra tio n s a re m u ch m o re im p o rta n t. T h e th ick n ess of th e
face m aterial, for exam ple, usu ally is g re a ter th a n th e th eo retical value, because it
m ight n o t be feasible to m a n u fac tu re a n d form very th in sheets. Likew ise, th e
co re w as assum ed to su p p o rt the facings sufficiently to d ev elo p th e sam e u n it
stress as in a solid elem ent, w h ereas th e actu a l lo w -d en sity m ate ria ls m ight n o t
pro v id e such su p p o rt. f
4.7 T Y P I C A L D E S I G N DATA FO R M A T E R IA L S
Tension
Ultimate stress
Yield stress
Proportional limit
fc M odulus of elasticity
e Elongation
C (impression
Ultimate (block) stress
a<y Yield stress
**cr
Proportional limit
Column yield stress
M odulus of elasticity
'Shear
<7SU Ultimate stress
°S(
Torsional modulus of rupture
ff«P Proportional limit (torsion)
a Modulus of rigidity (torsion)
Bearing
17hru Ultimate stress
< *h rr
Yield stress
in M ilitary H a n d b o o k s, such as M 1 L -H D B K -5 A , M IL -H D B K -5 , M 1 L -H D B K -
17, M IL -H D B K -2 B . T ab ic 4.4 show s the typical m ech an ical d a ta req u ired in the
design of aero sp acc stru ctu res. N o rm ally th ese d a ta a re p re se n ted in acc o rd a n c e
w ith one of the follow ing bases:
PROBLEM S
4.1 The buckling load fur ;i sandwich column is approxim ately given by / ’ ~ i z 2 E l f l . 1. Kind the
thickness ratio of facing to the core which results in an optim um design (minimum weight) for the
column. Sec Fig. P 4.1.
>f
_L_,________________________
~ T ~ FT I T II
_i_________ I I 11 1 I I 1 I I LI
Figure IM.l
9 6 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
4.2 Find the weight ratio of a sandwich coiuron to that of a solid colum n whose m aterial is the same
as that o f the sandwich facings.
4-3 W ork Prob. 4.2 for a corc density of 0.015 lb/in 3 and the following specific cases o f facing
materials:
(а) 2024-T3 alum inum alloy (density = 0.1 Ib/in3)
(б) 6A1-4V titanium (density = 0.16 lb/in3)
(c) 321 stainless steel (density — 0.286 Ib/in3)
(J) Incone! (density = 0.3 lb/in')
(f) Beryllium (density = 0.069 lb/in3)
(/) Reinforced composite (unidirection)
11) Glass fiber (density = 0.09 lh/in3)
• (2) Boron fiber (density = 0.095 lb/in3)
(3) G raphite (density = 1.053 Ib/in3)
4.4 A missile-holding fixture on an aircraft is subject during each flight to the strcss-load history
shown in Kg. P4.4. After how many flights will the fixture fail if the material fatigue allowable is that
shown in Fig. 4.10?
Time, s
Figure P4.4
4.5 Ten parts were fatigue-tested at the same stress level, and the fallowing failure cycles were
reported:
1 300.000
2 190,000
3 225,000
4- 350,000
5 260,000
6 280,000
7 490,000
8 310.000
9 360,000
10 390,000
After how many cycles should the part be replaced so that only the following percentage of (he parts
in service fails before replacement'?
<«) 1 i
<h)5
(<■> 1 0
CHA PTER
FIVE
STRESS ANALYSIS
5.1 I N T R O D U C T I O N
In o rd er to select sizes o f stru ctu ra l m em b ers to m eet th e desig n load req u ire
m ents on a specific a ero sp a cc vehicle, it is n ecessary to find th e unit stresses
acting on the cro ss sectio n o f each stru c tu ra l elem en t. T h e u n it stress referred to
here is the force in ten sity a t an y po in t, a n d it h as u n its o f fo rce p er u n it area, o r
p o unds per sq u a re inch in co m m o n en gineering units.
It w as show n in C h a p . 3 th at there exist tw o d istin c t c o m p o n e n ts of stress,
norm al a n d sh e a r stress. A n o rm al stress is a u n it stress w h ic h a c ts n o rm al to th e
cross section of th e s tru c tu ra l elem ent, w hile th e sh e a r stress is p arallel an d in th e
plane of th e cro ss section. A n orm al stress is induced by b e n d in g m om ents a n d
axial forces. A sh e a r stress, how ever, is cau sed by to rsio n a l m o m e n ts and sh e a r
forces. T his c h a p te r discusses the theory a n d th e a p p lic a tio n o f these tw o fu n d a
m ental stress co m p o n en ts.
5.2 F O R C E - S T R E S S R E L A T I O N S H I P S
97
9 8 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
K = a x2 dA T = j j y a X2 - z a xJ dA
A
5 .3 N O R M A L S T R E S S E S IN BEAM S
«.v.v = <tx. x
H ence, from Eq. (4.2)
e „ = nx. , - ViA=. + z x (5-3)
At an y given cross scction .v = x 0 ,
dux(x 0)
— c o n st =
dx
# ;( * o )
= c o n st = B z
dx
o)
= c o n st = B 3
dx
w here Eq. (5.3) beconics
^xx ~ B i + B 2 y + B 3 z (5.4)
In o rd e r to d eterm in e ihe stresses w hich c o rre sp o n d to th e stra in s in Eq. (5.4),
the stress-strain re la tio n sh ip in C hap. 3 is utilized. By assu m in g th a t the stresses
a . , an d <r are negligible co m p ared to a x x , th e fo llo w in g relatio n sh ip for an
iso tro p ic m aterial m ay be o b ta in e d easily from E q. (3.25):
= P^xx (5 -5)
w here E = m o d u lu s o f elasticity o f the m aterial.
S u b stitu tin g Eq. (5.4) in to Eq. (5.5) yields
(txx = h ( B | 4 B 2 y + B 3 z) (5.6)
100 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
P = F.(B, + B 2 y + B 3 z) dA
Af: = - j E y ( B , + B 2 y + / J 3 2)d/4
Mf = E z (B t + B 2 y + B 3 z) dA
— By A + B 2 y + B 3 z
■M.
p — y + l x B 2 + Jy- B 3 (5.7)
M.
~ f = B l z + l yzB2 + ly B3
y dA
z dA 4 5 .9 )
P
—= B ,A
-M .
— — = L B, + / B, ( 5 .1 0 )
STR1SS ANALYSIS 101
3 E (lyL - I 2
yz)
P _ I y Mz + + IyzM z
“ ^ lyl z - ^ p y+ '1 ,1 .- 1 % ( )
W hen Eq. (5.12) is used, it is im p o rta n t to observ e th e sign c o n v e n tio n used in th e
d eriv atio n . See Fig. 5.1. In cases w h ere y a n d z axes a re p rin c ip a l axes o f th e
cross-sectional are a , th e p ro d u c t o f th e m o m e n t o f in e r tia I yz a b o u t these axes is
zero. F o r this c o n d itio n , Eq. (5.12) rcduces to
o xx = ^ (5.14)
1ZJ
5 .4 S H E A R S T R E S S E S I N B E A M S
5.2) arc show n in Fig. 5.3. At an y p o in t a d istan ce >’ from the n e u tral axis, th e
b en d in g stress will be M . y / L o n the left face an d M . v / I z + Vs ijy/I. on th e right
facc. In o rd e r to o b ta in th e sh e a r stress a t a distance y = y i above th e n eu tral
axis, th e p o rtio n o f th e beam above th a t p o in t is co n sid ered as a free body, as
show n in Fig. 5.3c. F o r eq u ilib riu m o f th e h o riz o n tal forces, the force p ro d u c e d
by the sh ear stress trf I o n th e h o riz o n ta l area o f w id th t a n d length 5 x m ust be
equal to the difference in the n o rm a l forces o n the tw o cro ss sections. S u m m in g
forces in the h o riz o n ta l d ire c tio n yields
K
ydA (5.16)
1- t .
•'>'1
Figurc 5.3
STRUSS ANALYSIS 103
/. = 2 3 x ~ | + 3 x 2.5 2 + ( I x — 1 = 43.3 in 4
I , : = P = M }. = 0
T h e m axim u m n o rm al stress is
M =y_ 40 x 20( + 3)
------- ------------ = + 5 5 .4 k ip s/in
"'' ~ 77 ~
F o r a p o in t 1 in below the to p o f th e b ea m , th e in teg ra l o f Eq. (5.16) is e q u a l
to the m o m e n t of th e a re a o f the u p p e r rectan g le a b o u t th e n eu tral axis:
Figure 5.4
104 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
T h is sh e a r stress a t th is p o in t is
40,000
v d A = — ;------ (2.5 x 3 + 1 x 2) = 8780 Ib /in 2
Jy i 43.3 x 1
2 3 1 0 Ib/in 2
(V 3 0 lb/in 2
r z ii— :
“ h k 8 3 2 0 Ib/in2
S7X0 Ib/in 2
.U 0 Ib /in 2
7 ^ * 6 ^3 0 Ib/in2
c_ _ i:
2 3 1 0 lb /in 2 F igure 5.5
STRESS ANALYSIS 105
z.n I in
6 9 3 0 lb m o ib
1390 lb 13901b
460 lb
= H320
It/) <«■)
Figure 5.6
E xam ple 5.2 In the beam cro ss sectio n sh o w n in F ig. 5.7, the w ebs a re
co n sid ered to be ineffective in resisting n o rm a l stresses b u t cap ab le o f tra n s
m ittin g shear, F aeh strin g er area o f 0.5 in 2 is assu m ed to b e lum ped a t a
p o in t. F in d the sh e a r stress d istrib u tio n in th e w ebs.
vV
(T = 1 5 .0 0 0 Ill/in
:n,000 Ih/iir
i 5 .000 lh /in 2
W>
Figure 5.7
106 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
<t^(0.04)(I) = 6 0 0 + 2 0 0
or
ayx = 2 0 ,0 0 0 lb /in 2
8000
y dA = (0.5 X 6 ) = 15,000 lb/in
40 x 0.040
K. Cc 8000
) ’ d A = 4Q - 0 04Q (0.5 x 6 + 0.5 x 2) = 20,000 ib/irT
(a) <M
Figure 5.8
STRESS ANALYSIS 107
= —6457j> + 9.0 6 z
5 .5 S H E A R FLO W IN T H I N W EBS
q d z = qz (5.17)
'- r
w here z is the h o riz o n ta l d ista n c e betw een th e ends o f th e w eb. T h e to ta l vertical
force on the w eb is
q d y = qy (5.18)
■ '- f
w here v is th e vertical d istan ce betw een the en d s o f the w eb. T h e re su lta n t force is
qL, w here L is th e len g th o f the stra ig h t line jo in in g the en d s o f th e web, a n d th e
re su ltan t force is p arallel to this line. E q u a tio n s (5.17) an d (5.18) a re in d ep en d en t
o f the sh a p e o f th e w eb, b u t d ep en d o n th e co m p o n e n ts o f th e d istan ce betw een
the ends o f the w eb. T h e ind u ccd to rsio n al m o m e n t o f th e re su lta n t force d ep en d s
o n the sh ap e o f th e w eb. T h e to rq u e ind u ced a t a n y p o in t su ch as 0 , sh o w n in
Fig. 5.1 la , is e q u a l to rq ds. T h e a re a d A o f th e triang le fo rm ed by jo in in g p o in t 0
an d the ex trem ities o f th e elem en t o f length ds is r ds/2. T h e n th e to rq u e indu ced
by the sh e a r flow a lo n g th e en tire w eb m ay b e o b ta in e d as follow s:
T = qr ds = 2q d A — 2q J dA
(5.19)
T = 2 Aq
/
<u.
fig u re 5.10
I
str e ss / a n a l y sis 109
ds
Figure 5.11
(M Figure 5.12
I 10 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
E xam ple 5.4 F in d the sh e a r flows in the w ebs o f th e beam show n in Fig.
5.13a. E ach o f th e fo u r flange m em bers h as an a re a o f 0.5 in 2. T h e w ebs a re
assum ed to c a rry n o b en d in g stress. F in d th e sh e a r c e n te r for the area.
V v 10,000 x 5 ,
= — -----------------= 1000 lb/in
L 50
T h e load o n each 0 .5 -in 2 area resu ltin g from this stress is 500 lb an d is show n
in Fig. 5.13h. T h e a c tu a l m ag n itu d e o f the b en d in g stress is n o t needed in th e
shear-flow analysis, since the sh e a r flow d ep en d s o n o n ly the ch an g e in
b en d in g m o m e n t o r th e shear. If each w eb is cu t in th e span w ise direction, as
show n, th e sh e a r forces o n the c u t w ebs m u st b a la n c e th e lo ad s o n th e
STRESS ANALYSIS I I I
I T e = 0^3
- 10,000e + 500(4)(10) = 0
or e= 2 in
T h e sh ear c e n te r will be o n a h o riz o n tal axis o f sy m m etry , since a h o rizo n tal
forcc a lo n g this axis will p ro d u c e n o tw isting o f th e beam .
1000 lb/in
(*)
Figure 5.14
11 2 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
= 1 ^ 2 x 4 x ! = 10001b
12
I Tc = 0 4}
or e = 14.32 in
T h e thin-w eb, o p en-sectio n b o x b eam s p rev io u sly c o n sid ered are c a p ab le o f re
sisting lo ad s w hich are applied at the sh e a r c e n te r b u t b eco m e u n stab le u n d e r
to rsio n a l lo ad s. In m a n y stru c tu re s, especially in a e ro sp ace vehicles, th e re su ltan t
lo a d takes on differen t p o sitio n s fo r d ifferen t lo a d in g c o n d itio n s an d co n se
q u en tly m ay p ro d u c e to rsio n . O n an a irc ra ft w ing, Tor ex am p le, th e re su lta n t
a e ro d y n am ic lo a d is farth e r fo rw ard o n th e w in g a t high an g les o r a tta c k th a n a t
low angles o f a tta c k . T he p o sitio n o f this lo a d also chan g es w h en th e ailero n s o r
w ing flaps a re deflected. T h u s a closed-section box beam , w hich is c a p ab le o f
resisting to rsio n , is used for airc ra ft w ings a n d sim ila r stru c tu res. T ypical type§. o f
w ing co n stru c tio n a re sh o w n in Fig. 5.15. T h e w in g section o f Fig. 5.15a has*6 nly
Spar
Stringers (longitudinals)
Figure 5.15 Ty pical w ing construction.
STRESS ANALYSIS 113
T = X 2(AA)q = 2 A q (5.21)
or q x = V> * lh l - q 0 (5.22)
Vy C - 2 A q 0 = 0
V .C
Vrh'
^
A' Yz£
term s o f the sh ear flow q0 by co n sid erin g the span w ise eq u ilib riu m o f the strin g
ers betw een w eb 0 an d th e w eb u n d er co n sid e ra tio n :
q, = f/n + A P,
ll2 = clo + AP j + A P 2
................................................... (5.24)
or <7„ = Qa + Z
0
wliere APn rep resen ts the su m m atio n o f lo ad s A P betw een 0 an d any web n.
A fter all the sh ear flows a re expressed in term s o f the u n k n o w n q0 , the value o f
q0 m ay be o b tain ed from the su m m atio n o f ihc to rsio n a l m o m en ts. N o te th a t the
shear flow in any o th e r w eb could have been co n sid ered as th e u n k n o w n q0 . F o r
the case of general b en d in g , the difference in axial lo ad o n th e stringers A P
betw een tw o sections 1 in a p a rt m ay be fo u n d from Eq. (5.12). M ak in g the
su b stitu tio n s M . = VJ. 1 in), M y = V.{1 in), a n d P = 0 yields
\ 1y 1 z yz 1y ‘ z J yz /
E xam ple 5.6 Find the sh e a r flow in all w ebs o f th e box beam show n in Fig.
5 .19a.
2 5 0 Ib 5001b
0>)
7u 250 Qa ~ 500
-*T------------ ^ ------------
'•» - •/* , N <r
\ *S
N \ U0 | </,. 1000 •
1 - 1 = 2 7 8 .5
____________ I
0
7n 250 t/1, 500
io kips
(r>
Figure 5.19
I T0 = 0 +
9/>0
- 10,000(8) + too - ^00X100) + (<7 o - 500X100) + <?0(278.5) = 0
or q0 = 324 Ib/in
E xam ple 5.7 F in d the sh e a r flow in th e w ebs o f the box b eam show n in Fig.
5.20.
/ }, = (2 x 3 + 2 x 1 )(1 0 2) = 800 in 4
V. = 4 kips
Os
\X = 10 kips
STRIiSS ANALYSIS 1 17
y
I
Section C-C-
A P = (23.33z - 73.33y)/4j
or 400</„ - 200,000 = 0
118 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
(ft)
Kigurc 5.22
STRESS ANALYSIS 1 19
K = >> + K (5.26 a)
Vj = P (lan a , + ta n a 2) (5.26b)
(5.27)
FqiuU ion (5.27) will ap p ly for a beam w ith a n y system o f vertical loads. F o r the
present loading, the value o f P is Vy bfh. S u b stitu tin g th is v alu e for P into Eq.
(5.27) yields
(5.28)
(5.29)
(5.30a)
an d (5.30ft)
h
(5.31)
E xam ple 5.8 Find the sh e a r flows in the w eb o f th e beam sh o w n in Fig. 5.23
a t 2 0 -in in terv als alo n g Ihe span.
1 in A
K
[^\ 20 in
n I in2 A
S
\
Scction AA 10.000 lb
Figure 5.23
W hile slid e-ru le accu racy is sufficient for shear-flow calc u latio n s, th e values
in T a b le 5.1 a re c o m p u te d to fo u r sign ifican t figures fo r co m p ariso n w ith a
m eth o d to be d ev elo p e d later.
S o l u t i o n T h e m o m en t o f in e rtia o f th e c ro ss section a t A A a b o u t th e n e u
tral axis is
/ = 2(2 + 1 + 1X52) = 2 0 0 in 4
T able 5.1
*2 K
X h h I 1., ^ 7
0 10 1 10.000 1,000
20 12 0.8333 8.333 694.4
40 14 0.7143 7,143 510.2
60 16 0.6250 6,250 390.6
80 18 0.5555 5,555 308.6
100 20 0.5 5,000 250.0
f
I in
Figure 5.24
AP = ~ yAf
-2(5 0 0 X 1 0 ) - 2(500)(20) = 0
q„ = 60 lb/in
Figure 5.25
122 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
Figure 5.26
In See. 5.9, b eam s w ere co nsid ered w hich varied in d e p th hu t had stringers w hose
cross sections w ere c o n sta n t. In m an y a e ro sp a c e stru c tu ra l beam s, the cross-
sectional area o f th e strin g e r m em bers varies as well as th e d ep th o f the beam . If
the areas o f all the strin g e r m em b ers a re in creased by a c o n sta n t ra tio , th e
m eth o d o f Sec. 5.9 can be used ; if (he a re a s a t o n e cro ss section are n o t p ro
p o rtio n a l to the a re a s a t a n o th e r cro ss sectio n , th e m e th o d w ould be co n sid erab ly
in erro r. T h e airp la n e w ing section in Fig. 5.27 rep resen ts a stru c tu re in w hich th e
v ariatio n in strin g e r a reas m ust be co n sid ered . T h e strin g e r areas in this w ing are
designed in such a m a n n e r th a t th e b e n d in g stresses a re c o n sta n t along the span.
In o rd e r to resist th e la rg e r b ending m o m e n ts n e a r th e ro o t o f the w ing, (he
bending stre n g th is a u g m en ted by increasin g th e d e p th o f th e w ing and the a re a
of sp a r cap s A a n d B. T h e strin g ers w hich resist the p a rt o f th e bending m o m en t
n o t resisted by the s p a r cap s h av e th e sam e a re a for th e en tire sp an . Since the
axial stresses on these strin g ers a re th e sam e a t every p o in t alo n g the sp an , the
increm ents o f lo a d in crease A P will be ze ro except o n s p a r cap s A an d B. I t m ay
be seen from F.q. (5.24) th a t the sh e a r flow m u st be c o n sta n t a ro u n d the e n tire
leading edge o f the w ing a n d ch an g es o n ly a t th e s p a r caps. C onseq u en tly , th e
m eth o d s o f analy sis p reviously used a re n o t a p p lic ab le to th is problem .
-The b en d in g stresses a n d to ta l strin g e r lo ad s m a y be calcu lated for tw o cro ss
sections o f th e beam . T h e actu a l d im en sio n s a n d strin g e r areas for each cross
section a rc used, so th a t an y ch an g es b etw een th e cro ss sections are ta k e n in to
STRIiSS ANALYSIS 123
Figure 5.28
' P — P
A = ... ... ....- (5.32)
a
E xam ple 5.10 F in d th e sh ear flows in th e b eam o f F ig. 5.23 b y the m eth o d of
using diflerences in b en d in g stresses.
AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
Table 5.2
M
.X M h P = ~h P > -P . 20 Percentage error
(1 ) (2 ) (3) (4) (5) (6 ) (7)
10 100,000 11 9,091
20 13,986 699.3 0.7
30 300,000 13 23.077
40 10,256 512.8 0.5
50 500,000 15 33,333
60 7,843 392.1 0.4
70 700,000 17 41.176
80 6,192 309.6 0.3
90 900,000 19 47,368
1 1 in
Station 60
C*)
Mr 320,000(4.5)
= 8 8 8 8 lb /in 2
lz 162
I z = 8(5.52) = 242 in 4
l.M (6 )
Figure 5.3!
126 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
are
M zy 480,000 x 5.5
, - 2 4 2 - 10,909 ib /in 2
T he lo ad s on the strin g e rs are 10,909 a n d 21,818 lb, as show n in Fig. 5.3 hi.
T he increm ents o f flange lo ad s A P in a 1-in length are fo u n d from Eq. (5.32).
F o r the a re a o f 2 in 2,
A„ 2 1 ,8 1 8 - 7 ,7 7 7
A P = — ------— ------- = 202 b
20
F o r the a rea o f 1.0 in 2
0,909 - 8 8 8 8
A P = — :— —---------= 101 lb
20
5.11 A IR Y S T R E S S F U N C T I O N
= ‘I’..,, (5.33)
= - <t>...
STRESS ANALYSIS 127
then Eqs. (3 .1 1) arc identically satisfied. U p o n s u b s titu tin g Eqs. (5.33) in to Eq.
(3.29), the follow ing is o b ta in e d :
„ + 2® «w + Q „„ = 0 (5.34)
T h e so lu tio n o f Eq. (5.34) satisfies b o th the eq u ilib riu m a n d the co m p atib ility
eq u a tio n s a n d therefore gives a possible stress field in an elastic solid. In o rd e r for
the o b ta in e d stress field to describe the tru e sta te o f stress for a specific problem ,
the prescribed b o u n d a ry c o n d itio n s m ust be satisfied also.
T h e so lu tio n o f Eq. (5.34) m ay be o b ta in e d by tw o m e th o d s: the polynom ial
so lu tio n an d the F o u rie r series solution.
4 4 / n
<I>(.Y, v) = I 0„(.v, y) = I I A in (5.37)
it — 1 n=l \i =0
"xx = = 2 ^ 2 2
17yy ^ = 2 ^ 0 2 (5.38)
<T.SV = 0
-/ r
(<> (</)
Figure 5 3 2
= + 6 A 3Ax y
nrs = 0 (5.39)
<*.»■ dv = v at x = 0 4 5 .4 0 )
dy at .x = 0
■AI2 - 3 A 3 i /i2 = 0
( A i2 3 A M y 2) d y = (5.41)
STRESS ANALYSIS 129
"*U
4 ■R = S
(fc)
Figure 5 J 3
A l2 ~ 4 h
H cncc the tru e beam stresses are
S 3 V
xy
2 /i 2 h3 Xy 2h
"y y = 0
(5.42)
3 V --------
3 V y, l .
--------------- 1
(ft2 - y 1)
4 h 4 h 21
A
■/>-}■»- — /i4- h —
.£ ---------4 - ----------i-
(a) (/>)
Figure 5.34
U tilising Eq. (5.43«) or (5.43/>) in Eq. (5.43) a n d then su b stitu tin g in to Eq.
(5.34) yield
d 2<i\
r - 2 /i: (5.45)
dx dy2
w here fl = m n/L.
E q u atio n (5.45) is a fo u rth -o rd e r h o m o g en eo u s differen tial eq u a tio n w ith
c o n sta n t coefficients. Its so lu tio n can be o b ta in e d easily in term s o f hyperbolic
fu n ctio n s as
, . mnx
+ C 4 y cosh fly) sin —— (5.47a) .
L /
y) = (T , sinh fly + C 2 cosh fly + C j.v sinh fly
mitx
+ C' 4 y cosh fly cos —— (5.41b)
PROBLEM S
5.1 Find ihc maximum tensile and maximum compressive stresses resulting from bending of the
beam shown in Fig. 1*5.1. Kim! the distribution of shear stresses over the cross section at the section
where the shear is a maximum, considering points in the cross section at vertical intervals of 1 in.
1 in
T
3 in
£Z z j ;
~T
3 in
3 in
5.2 Find the maximum *hcar and bending stresses in the beam cross section shown in Fig. P5.2 if the
shear V is 10,000 lb and the bending moment M is 400,000 in - lb. Both angles have the same cross
section. Assume the web to be cITective in resisting bending stresses.
JL
0 .5 in
T / - 0 . 15 in4
10 in A = 0 .S in2
-0.051 in
Figure P5.2
5.3 Find the shear stress anil the sliear-flow distribution over the cross section of the beam shown in
Fig. P5..1. Assume the tveb to be ineffective in resisting bending and the stringer areas to be con
centrated at points.
1.0 in2
f\
— r
10 m1
\
Sin
\ 0 . 0 4 0 in
\
2.0 in2
5.4 Each o r the live upper stringers has an area or 0.4 in2, and each or the five lower stringers has an
area of 0.8 in2. Find the shear nows in all IIn- webs if the verticil) shearing force is 12,000 Ib.
~T
2 in
’ (>in
1 in
t Figure P5.4
£L5/Each o f the six stringers of the cross section shown in Fig. P5.5 and P5.6 has an area of 0.5 in2.
Fnul the shear Dows in all webs and the location of the shear center for a vertical shearing force of
^10,000 Ib.
Find ,hc shear n° ws in aI1 wchs in FiS- anci for a horizontal shearing force of 3000 Ib.
Each stringer has an area of 0.5 in2.
^ .7 \lrind a general expression for the shear-dow distribution around the circular tube shown in Fig.
P5.7. Assume the wall thickness I lo he small compared with the radius R.
STRESS ANALYSIS 1 33
5.8 Use P.qs. (5.17) and (5.18) lo find the shear flow in the webs of the tw o-stringer beams shown in
Fig. P5.8 under the action of a vertical shear Vr . <
Figure P5.8
5.9 Find the shear-flow distribution for Ihe section shown in Fig. PS.9.
1 in
Figure P5.9
5.10 Find the shear (lows in Ihe webs of the box beam shown in Fig. P5.10 if the area is symmetrical
about a horizontal centerline. •
Figure P5.10
5.11 Find the shear Hows in the webs of the beam shown in Fig. P5.U and P5.12. All stringers have
areas of 1.0 in2.
5.12 Assume that the Iwo right-hand stringers in Fig. P 5 .ll and P5.12 have areas of 3.0inJ and the
other stringers have areas of 1.0 in2. Kind the shear flows in the webs by two methods.
134 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
5.13 Find the shear (lows in ail webs if the two right-hand stringers shown in Fig. P5.I3 have areas of
1.5 in2 and the other stringers have areas of 0.5 in2.
5.14 Find the shear-flow distribution in all webs shown in Fig. P5.14. Ml parts of the cross section
resist bending stresses.
Figure P5.I4
5.15 Solve Fxample 5.8 if the beam depth varies from 5 in at the free end to 15 in at the support. (Sec
1-ig. P5.15.)
STRESS ANALYSIS 135
Figure P5.I5
5.16 Find Ihc shear flows for the cross section at x — 50 in. Consider only this one cross section, but
calculate the torsional moments by two methods.
(a) Select the torsional axis arbitrarily, and calculate the in-plane com ponents of the flange
loads.
(fc) Take moments about a torsional axis joining the centroids of the various cross sections.
5.17 Repeal Prob. 5.16 if there is an additional chordwise load of 6000 lb acting to the left at the
center of the tip cross section.
5.18 A cantilever beam 30 in long carries a vertical load of 1000 lb at the free end. The cross section
is rectangular and is 6 by 1 in. Find the maximum bending stress and the location of the neutral axis
if (d) the 6-in side is vertical, (b) the 6-in side is tilted 5° from the vertical, and (c) the 6-in side is tilted
10° from the vertical.
5-19 A horizontal beam with a square cross section resists vertical loads. Find the angle of the
neutral axis with the horizontal if one side of the beam makes an angle 0 with the horizontal. At what
angle should the beam be placed for the bending stress lo have a minimum value?
5.20 Find the bending stresses and stringer loads for the box beam whose cross section is shown in
Fig. P5.20 if M . = 100,000 and M y = -40,000 in - lb. Assume the areas of the stringer members are
as follows:
(d) a= h = r = // = 2 in 2
(b) a= b= 1 in2. c = <1 - 1 in'
(r) a= </ - 3 in2 b = <■— 1 in"
(<•/) a= c= 3 in2. h — tl - 1 in
(c) a= c= 1 in 2. b = d = 3 in
Figure P5.20
5.21 A beam with the cross section shown in Fig. P5.21 resists a bending m om ent A/. - 100 in • lb.
Calculate the bending stresses a t points A, U, and C.
136 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
Figure P5.2I
5.22 The box beam shown in Fig. P5.22 resists bending moments o f A/. = 1,000,000 and A/v =
120.(100 in * Ib. Find Ihe bending stress in each stringer member. Assume th at the webs are ineffective
in bending and the areas and coordinates of the stringers are as follows:
5.23 Find the shear flows at the cross section shown in Fig. P5.23 and P5.24 for x = 50 in. Consider
only Ihe one cross scction, and calculate the in-plane com ponents of the stringer loads.
5.24 Repeal Prob. 5.23. using the differences in stringer loads shown in Fig. P5.23 and P5.24 at the
cross scction for x -= 40 and a* — 60 in.
5.25 Calculate the shear Hows in the webs of the cross section shown in Fig, P5.25 and P5.26 at
x — 50 in. Assume the flange areas as follows:
Consider only the one cross section, and calculate the in-plane com ponents of the flange loads.
5.26 Repeal Prob. 5.25, using the dilfcrences in flange loads at the cross section shown in Fig. P5.25
and P5.26 for .v —40 anti 60 in. Use a torsional axis joining the centroids of the cross sections.
a h
5.27 Find the shear Hows at station 100 of ihe fuselage shown in Fig. P5.27. Assume all stringer areas
to be I in2.
Figure P5.27
5.28 Using Ihe Airy stress function, find the stresses in the beams shown in Fig. P5.2X.
’<) Ib/in
4
~ T ■ r r r r <
\
------------ --- - - - - - -
\
\
K
^ ^ 4 ii
-«---------------------IllO in---------------------- H -•----------------------100 in -----------------------
138 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
5.29 A circular, thin plate is under the action of uniformly distributed pressure applied around the
outer edge. Kind the stresses, using the Airy stress function. Assume the plate thickness is equal to I.
(See Fig. P5.29.)
CHA PTER
SIX
DEFLECTION ANALYSIS OF
STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS
6.1 I N T R O D U C T I O N
139
1 4 0 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
and W = U (6.2)
w here U a n d U are th e stra in energy a n d c o m p lem en tary stra in energy, resp ect
ively. F ig u re 6.1b show s a g ra p h ic a l re p re se n ta tio n o f these q u an tities.
Figure 6.1 la) w o rk and co m p lem en tary w o rk : (M strain an d com plem entary strain energies.
n i'iF t.i-rn o N a n a l y s is o f s t r u c t u r a l sy ste m s 141
A W = 6 W = Q„ 5q„ (6.3)
If the v a ria tio n s in S W a n d S U a re c o n sid ere d for th e v a ria tio n of all d isp lace
m en ts </,■(i = 1 , 2 , . . . , n) co n sisten t w ith th e c o n strain ts, th e n
S W = lS q ] { Q } (6.7)
5 U * = L<5£J{£} ( 6 .8 )
l S E \ = S [ e xx e yy e z. e (6.9)
and
(6 .10)
-'E1- =
expressed as
( 6 .1 1 )
w here the ex tern al ap p lied forces {Q} a n d th e in tern al stresses {E} are assu m ed
to be in e q u ilib riu m a n d th e c o o rd in a te d isp lacem en ts {<5c/} a n d the stra in s {<5£}
satisfy the c o m p a tib ility c o n d itio n
{SE} = (6.13)
M G } M * ] T{£} d v (6.14)
or, in ex p an d ed form ,
Q i'
Qz
Qi
LG.J
4 , *62 *63 ■*
Qi |A J{ £ } d V (6.16)
V
w here the row m atrix [/.,j is delined by Eq. (6.13), w hich u n d e r th e co n d itio n
fO for r ^ i
K = (, for r = i
bccom cs
S(U + P) = 5 V = 0 (6.18)
- - = () (/ = 1, 2, ..., n) (6.19)
W = \te M ) (6 -2 0 )
By n o tin g th a t ?>V is a fu n ctio n o f th e c o o rd in a te g en eralized * d isp lacem en ts
[ (>y. (i = | , 2 ........ /i)] a n d using th e T a y lo r series e x p an sio n , E q. (6.20) becom es
" PU . I ” " 5 2 l/
dL, = ^ ()q + - £ £ — — Sqt Sqj +■■■
i i <’<h 2 ,-e, d q jq j
or. in m atrix form ,
w = l> /J { ^ 1 + + ••• (6 .2 1 )
w here the sum bol P ilcn o tcs p artial d ifferen tiatio n a n d th e m a trix [S ] is a stiffness
m atrix w hose elem ents a re defined by
S ,t = ~ Pcjj ( / , ; = 1 , 2 , . . . , «) (6.22)
Pq,
144 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
or
or
(6.23)
F o r / = r, E q. (6.23) sta te s th a t
(6.24) -
A W = 5 W = q„ 5Q„ (6,25)
and
w here
If we co n sid er the v a ria tio n s in 5 W a n d <51/ fo r the v a ria tio n o f all forces
Qi (i = 1 , 2 , . . . , n), E qs. (6.25) a n d (6.26) b ecom e
sw = im W s (6.28)
DEFLECTION ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS 145
an d
6V - L<52|{£} d V (6.29)
S W = 5U (6.30)
or
- J L « :j{ £ } d y (6.31)
w here the d isp lacem en ts {</] an d the c o rre sp o n d in g stra in s {£} a re co m p atib le
and the virtual forces \^ Q ) an d c o rre sp o n d in g stresses {<5£} satisfy the eq u ilib
rium c o n d itio n
- * Q K <tqT{ E } d V (6.33)
In F.q. (6.33). if every virtual forcc SQr '(r = 1, 2, n), r =£ i] is set equal to
zero w ith the ;'th force SQ, given a u n it value, th e n th e e q u a tio n becom es
w here the row m atrix |’<I>| is defined by Eq. (6.32), w hich u n d e r th e co n d itio n
( 0 for r # /
S Q .-
= •° ?
1 1 for r = i
becom es
Ld>iJ = [ < 5 S J ( 6 .3 5 )
i){p f U) = d V = 0 ( 6 .3 6 )
w here
ft
fiW = -8 P = I q ,5 Q , ( 6 .3 7 )
i= 1
146 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
dV
— = 0 i = 1, 2 , n (6.38)
<Q,
o r, in m atrix form ,
im u i) = m i
or
or
?U
,
4 = -^ r
OQr
(644)
W — W —M M (6.45a)
and
G xx
°yy
a„
U = U = - dV (6.46)
2
U — U = \- iA im d v (6.46a)
the co rre sp o n d in g n o d al co o rd in a te d isp lacem en ts; the m atrices [A'J an d {£} are
the strain an d stress fields, respectively.
By u tilizatio n o f H o o k e ’s law , Eq. (6.46) m a y b e expressed in term s o f stresses
o r strain s a lo n e a s follow s:
U = U =4 L Z JiX K E } d V (6.47)
or
U = V =4 L E J [0 ]{ £ } d V (6.48)
—V I sy m m etric
—V —v 1
[N] = - (6.49)
0 0 0 2 (1 + v)
0 0 0 0 2 (1 + v)
0 0 0 0 0 2 (1 + v) _
an d
1- V
V 1 - V sym m etry
[© ] = t, V V 1 - V
(6.50)
0 0 0 (1 - 2 v) / 2
0 0 0 0 (1 - 2 v )/2
0 0 0 0 0 ( 1 — 2 v) / 2
w here i] = E( 1 + vX 1 — 2v)
E = elastic m o d u lu s o f elasticity
v = P o isso n ’s ra tio
In stru c tu ra l system s w hich are c o n stru cte d from an assem blage o f b a r el
em ents, it is m o re co n v en ien t to express th e stra in energy in term s o f the elem ent
in tern al loads a n d then sum the c o n trib u tio n s o f each e lem en t to th e to tal stfa in
energy o f th e system .
T o derive th e stra in energy expression, co n sid e r a lin ear clastic b a r for w hich,
at any p o in t f a lo n g its length, the in tern a l lo a d s a re given by M .(0 , 7'({), K},(0,
an d Si0 , w here M . — b en d in g m o m en t a b o u t £ axis, T = to rq u e , Vy = sh ear force
in r d irection, a n d S = axial force. T h e n o rm a l stresses in d u ced in the b a r by the
internal force system m ay be o b ta in e d from C h ap . 5 and a re given as
-*rdV to
U- - 2 . v E
w here U„ = stra in en erg y d u e to n o rm al stresses only.
S u b stitu tin g Eqs. (a) a n d (/>) in to Eq. (c) yields
S \Q M 2(Q
v . - y . . + u.> = 2
dV y 2 dV
E A 2(Q 2 E Jy E I 2Z(Q
s2(0
l J E A ‘i 0 i / “ K * 2 E ] C JA [J
b ut
1 d A — /1(C) = cro ss-sectio nal a re a
T herefore,
u ■1 f s "(0 r , 1 f M -A 0 - (d)
U ° - 2 l F ^ Q d i + ~ 2j l, E ~
I z( Q
if)
T he w o rk d o n e o n the d ifferential elem ent di' by the force ^.(Q is equal to the
stra in energy sto red , or,
d W = d U s = i Vy e.y dZ
_ 1 V r2(Q
dc
2 G kA(Q
T herefore,
(h)
GkA(C)
T he strain energ y due to a to rq u e T can be sh o w n to be given by
‘ T 2( 0
u, = - dC (0
GJ
w here J = to rsio n a l c o n stan t.
T hus, for a stru c tu ra l system w hich is m ad e o f m stru c tu ra l b ar elem ents, the
strain energy expressio n m ay be w ritten as
t 2(q
+ ■ dC (6.51)
EA(Q £ 1 (0 kGA(C) GJ(Q
w here m = to ta l n u m b er o f elem ents in stru c tu re
S = axial in te rn al load
M = in te rn al b en d in g m o m en t
V — in te rn a l tran sv erse sh ear
T = in te rn a l to rq u e
A E , E l, AG. G J = ex ten sio n al, bending, sh e a r a n d to rsio n al rigidity, respectively
A, /, ,/ = cro ss-sectio n al area , m o m e n t o f inertia, a n d torsio n al
c o n sta n t, respectively
O' = sh e a r m o d u lu s
k = sh ear-fo rm facto r w hich ac c o u n ts for d is trib u tio n o f sh earin g
stresses acro ss b a r d ep th (for w ide flange sections, t s l ,
w hile for recta n g u la r sections, k ^ 0.833)
£ = generalized c o o rd in a te axis J
6 .6C A S T I G L I A INO ’S S E C O N D T H E O R E M IN D E F L E C T I O N
A N A L Y S IS O F S T R U C T U R E S
9, = ^ - {V = V) (*-52)
<~Qr
U = I/, + U 2 + U 3
v , = 2-
AE
L’,
AE
w here the c o o rd in a te ,v;; d en o tes the ax is being tak en a lo n g the direction
from i to j. F o r clem ent 1, there exist in te rn a l lo ad s in th e form o f bending,
shear, and axial loads. T herefore the stra in energy ex p re ssio n for this elem ent
is
U, -
, 4 i ; AVi' + 2 J. E l ix " + 2 . AG 2
T h e in tern al lo ad s in each elem ent m ay be fo u n d from sta tic s and are given
152 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
by
s ,=
V5
2Fy
Sj = •
Fr
S,
\T *
M i = F y x 2l
K = F y
M ak in g th e a p p ro p ria te su b stitu tio n s yields
21. 1
F yx 2 , d1x 2 1 + 1 F l d x 2i
2E l 2AG .
or
rr f n L 41} L \
C/ = ( — + — + — If 2
kG A E 3EI agj y
t dU (U L 8 L3 2L\
* ~ PFy ~ \ 3 / ( £ + 3 E l + A G J
(\\L 8 L3N\
‘ y ~ \ 3 A E + 3 E l) * /
E xam ple 6.2 F in d th e slo p e a n d vertical deflcction a t the tip o f (he can tile-
vcrcd beam show n in th e figure. N eglect s h e a r d efo rm atio n .
it A.I.E
DEFLECTION ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS 153
M , 2 = A4 23 = M 0 + Fy x
T herefore
U
2 FA
(M 0 + F yx ) 2 d x +
i;
| (W o + F y x) dx
3
M lL +
4El
du I 2H
8Fy a/ 0 = o 2El
8U _ 3 F VL2
slo p e = 0 =
d M 0 Mo —0 4E l
P it
M l2 = R( 1 — cos 0) — + (R sin 0)FX 0 < 0 <-
M 32 = M , 2
it/2
U - 2| i M \ ZR dO
El \2 E I
r* n
R( 1 — cos 0) — + FX R sin 0 R dO
El
clU 2 *jin
R( 1 - co s 0) — R 2 sinl) dO
F x - 0 M . 0
DEFLECTION ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS 155
or
PR3
2E l
m i, , j ft
1 M il , , 1
U = dx
~~e T 2 o + 5 CJ
w here M l2 = F r
M 23 F ,x
T23 = T,- + 7 ^ 1 - - ) + * L F
M il P M 23 T23 8 T 23
+ dx + dx
El ()F„ C J (IF,
and
M l2 0 M l2
dz
El dTF
<>m 12 _ d M 23 _ a r23 _
(!Tr dTF dTF
olL 2T0
+ 0 . , , +!
9 = I A®. (6.53)
n I
w here q is the generalized c o o rd in a te d isp lacem en t, /?„ a re u n d eterm in ed c o n sta n t
p a ra m e te rs a n d a re ch o sen such th a t th e to ta l p o ten tia l in th e system becom es
m inim um , an d <!>„ a re a chosen set o f fu n c tio n s w hich m u st satisfy o n ly th e
d isp lacem en t b o u n d a ry c o n d itio n s of th e s tru c tu re a t h a n d .
T h e u n d eterm in ed c o n sta n ts j8 „ a re o b ta in e d by so lu tio n o f a set o f sim ul
ta n eo u s lin ear alg eb raic e q u a tio n s w hich resu lt w hen th e prin cip le of minim.um
po ten tial is applied in c o n ju n c tio n w ith th e assu m ed deflection shape givefi by
Eq. (6.53). T h e m eth o d is best explained by co n sid e rin g th e follow ing exam ples.
E xam ple 6.5 U sing th e R ayleigh-R itz m eth o d , find th e d eflection of the sim ple
beam show n below. C o n sid e r b ending d e fo rm a tio n only.
DEFLECTION ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS 157
S o l u t i o n T h e b o u n d a ry c o n d itio n s o f th e b e a m a re
do)
B ending m o m cn l = M (0) = M ( L ) = 0 = E l (6.5.4)
dx2
d
(U + P) = 0 (*>
Wn
w here
ic)
^ = 2
and
- W = - P 0(x ) oj( x ) d x
T h e b en d in g m o m en t m ay be expressed in te rm s of co as fo llo w s:
d co tN
—, if nini'
n \i 2 „ ,
sin L
El V „ . nnx
U
j P -sm — dx ie)
and
P = -
U TT n ■ n7ZX if)
P0 L Pn sm — dx
) n=l t-
{(/)
and P = - — E - (n = l , 3, 5 , . . . ) W
7t n
158 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
F ro m Eq. (b)
— P )- -on -- —
+ n
t p Wi l l + L a " fr l . - 2-L
^ i . nn x
0 /= 71 £■' n = I, ^3. 5 , ... ift? s m ~Lr u)
6 .8F IN IT E D IF F E R E N C E M E T H O D IN D E F L E C T IO N
A N A L Y S IS O F S T R U C T U R E S
C loscd-form so lu tio n s o f differentia! eq u a tio n s rep resen tin g the d efo rm atio n s o f
stru c tu ra l system s a re n o t alw ay s possible. T h erefo re, th e ap p licatio n o f som e
a p p ro x im a te n u m erical m e th o d s is n o t on ly perm issible b u t, in m any instances,
desirable. T h e m o st co m m o n ly used is th e m e th o d o f finite differences. T he
m eth o d a p p ro x im a te s differen tials by finite d ifferences; as a result, it tra n sfo rm s a
set o f differential e q u a tio n s to a set o f sim u lta n e o u s a lg eb raic eq u atio n s, w hich
th e n can be solved easily.
T h e fu n d am en ta l re la tio n s o f finite differences m ay be established by co n
sid ering the existence o f a real, c o n tin u o u s sim ple function
0> = f ( x ) (6.55)
cM>
■■T1 (6.56)
dx Ax
or
A 4 f* * <I>; (6.58)
Ad)!/'
,w ~ ----- + A4>f >
1------------'—
Atf>j‘
or
'!>,+ , - <I>; (6.59)
AO;1'’
J<I>
(6.60)
dx 2 Ax
Jx2 (A.x)2
etc.
F o r a tw o -d im e n sio n a l function su ch as sh o w n in Fig. 6.5, th e p artial d eriv a
tives m ay be o b ta in e d as in the case o f o n e-d im en sio n al fu n c tio n :
<
2 <!> frm i.j fid)
dx 2 A-x dz 2 Az
1 6 0 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
5 20 f y + 1. J ~ - i . ,• d 20 _ . Q u + i - 2 0 ,.J +
d x 2 *. J (A x )2 dz2 u ~ m 2
d 3o ~ <t>e+^ J ~ Zf y +l . J + 2 0 , - j i — Q ,_ 2,
d x 3 *\i 2 (Ax ) 3
5 3<J>
~ ?-L J« - + 2® U -1 - * ,.J - 2
d z3 j 2 (Az ) 3 (6-62)
cj O • ~ ®i +2 . J ~ ^ I H . j + ~ 4 0 ,- 1 . i + 60; ,-
(Ax ) 4
5 40 f^)f. J + 2 ~~ 4(^i. j +1 + ^ i . i +1 ~ j 4- 60/,y
az* *<j (Az)4
^ 2o
~ (^>‘+ l . i + t ~ *^i- t . l - n ~ + ^ i- l.i- l
(?X d z 4 Ax Az
a 3o j+ t ~ I. 1 — 2<&i J+l + 2<fr; J _ | — <!>,•-I + q> ,_ , /+ 1
<V <•)>- «. j 2 (Ax ) 2 Az
a 3o O <+ 1. j + i — O j - i , / - i — 2 0 , + ] . j + 2Q,_, j — <!>,_, J+l + <I)[W.| j , |
d x d y 2 «-7 2 Ax (Az)2
V)
an d
ib ’)
2 A.v
*------ i / 4 ------►
p u l /4)
1
r Q x
\
K
I~
(a) 0}
u !4 — 41V-, + 6 u>2 — 4w j + w0 = 0
S
PL3
ws - 4 u ’4 + fiu -j - 4 u ’2 + iv , = — — (c)
64J57
>v„ — 4»v5 + 6 w4 — 4 w j + w 2 = 0
6 vv2 — 4w 3 = 0
PL*
-4 w , + 3w ,
128 E l
6 -4 M)
PL3
-4 3
128 E l
0.015 6 P L 3 0.0143 P U
VV■> — e x a c t:
2 FJ El
PL3 PL3\
e x a c t:
/ 42.7 El V 48 E l )
25
T h e g o v e rn in g differential e q u a tio n o f a flat p la te is given by
164 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
~ f d 2w d2 w \
M
_zW + vl y J
/ 5 2vv d 2w \
+ O itj_ 2
+ E w i - ! . j —i + F w i J_ t + E w !+k j _ 1
+ ^ Wi.j+2
w here A = -j-
H
^ + g2)
H
c = n*
u
2a 1
E - i r
4 a 2(l + a 2)
r = •
H
- = P (A x A y a ) 2
dh
A.x
“ “ Ay
H = 6 + 8 a2 + 6 * 4
PL3 PL3\
ex act:
•’ 42.7 E l 48 ElJ
, , „ ( d 2w d 2w
,== W + V3 /
/ d 2w d 2w \
+ C wi . j - 2
+ E w <- i . j i + F w i,j-\ + i
+ i ,; + i + F"',\,-+i + l.y + i to
+ <>U +2
B = - 4(1 +
H
2a2
e -~ h
_ 4 « 2(1 + a 2)
H
- F ( A .v A v a ) z
Ax
“ “ Ay
H = 6 + 8a2 + 6 a4
i
DEFLECTION ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS 165
S o l v i n g F q . (</) y ie ld s
PL*
iv, = 0.00559
D
PL*
vv2 = 0.00723
D
P I*
m'4 = 0.00778
D
PLz PL\
: 0.01008 ^ ( e x a c t: 0.01013 ^
D \ D
S in c e v v c.Im vc th e d i s p l a c e m e n ts , t h e m o m e n t s a r e c a lc u l a t e d a s f o llo w s :
16 D
- j (u ’6 - 2 vv5 + w4) + 0 .3 (w 8 - 2 w 5 + w 2)
L s)
Likew ise,
6.9 R E D U N D A N T S T R U C T U R E S A N D T H E
U N IT -L O A D M E T H O D
(6.63)
AE
S -- S q + -i^iS (6.64)
tfg u rc 6.7
168 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
_ r-< S n sL n s jL
+ ■■ ( M 5 >
o r , fo r /> = 0,
Z S 0 sL /(A E )
1~ I s 2L /(A E ) (6‘66)
( 6 .6 7 )
( 6-68)
X i = - T T ( 6 .6 9 )
/
It is easier to visualize th e dcflection term s o f Eq. (6.69) th a n the su m m a tio n
term s o f Eq. (6.66). T h e form o f Eq. (6.69) will a p p ly id en tically for rigid fram e
stru ctu res w ith single red u n d an t? except <5,, a n d <5(0 will h av e different defini-.
tions.
E xam ple 6.9 F in d the forces in the m em b e rs o f th e s tru c tu re o f E xam ple 6.8
if the su p p o rt at p o in t C is deflected 0.25 in to th e rig h t a n d the te m p e ra tu re
is decreased 4 0 "F. A ssum e a te m p e ra tu re coefficient o f ex p a n sio n a — 1 0 " 5
in/(in • °F).
T able 6.1
/. Spsl- s 2L
Total -0 .5 1 5 0 0.02008
170 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
T able 6.2
Member So X ,s S
AB - 5 6 .6 16.4 - 4 0 .2
BC - 5 6 .6 16.4 -4 0 .2
AD 44.8 - 2 5 .9 18.9
DC 44.8 -2 5 .9 18.9
BD 40.0 —23.2 16.8
acL (A T ) = 1 0 - 5 x 80 x 4 0 = 0.032 in
S = 00.032 - 0.25 = - 0 .2 8 2 in
i +
w here th e su m m a tio n te rm s a re o b tain ed in T a b le 6.1 a n d
- 0 .5 1 5 + 0 .0 2 0 0 8 Z , = - 0 .2 8 2
X , = 11.6 k ips
Mo= — (1 — co s P)
m = — R sin /?
Y - V ’R I P - E D W ~ c o s P ) ( ~ R s i n P)R dp P
' ' ~ ~ 2f t '2 [ ( - « s in p f R / i F J )] dp
T h e final b en d in g m o m en t is o b ta in e d b y su p e rim p o sin g th e values o f M 0 for
the ap p lied lo ad s a n d X tm for th e re d u n d a n t:
M = M 0 + X tm
PR PR
M = — (1 — cos p) — sin p
7Z
3 6 x 4 -1 -8 1 x 6 12x6x9
= - 1 .4 4 in
1000 800
172 a ir c r a f t s t r u c t u r e s
m , m, , sL
*.«
T i ds + Jd S + A£
7"0 » 12 in 'kip
Figure 6.10
DI-FLECTION ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS 1 7 3
6.10c:
18 x 4 + 40.5 x 6 6 x 6 x 9 12 x 40
--------- + 800 + ~200- - 0 '92 in /k ip
x '~ ■ ^ 7 - a 9 2 = , '5 6 5 k lp s
Figure 6.11
<5, = 5 1U + Ar1i51 j + X 25 l2
= <5io + * i <>i i + X 2 d l2 + ■ • • + X „ d ln
(52 = <S2(, -f , Y , ^ , + X 2 S 22 + ■ ■ ■ + X „ d 2n (6.71)
V (>12 . • 8i.~ X,
<>2 = <>20 + <>22 ' ■d2„ * 2
(6.71a)
.A . _V . ' 5 nn_
c __S n L>
(6.72)
mn ~ ^ AE
= I € dC (6.73)
El El
Sj ~ $0 + -Y 1 Si + ^ 2 S2 + ' ' ‘ + X n sn
or M j -- M u + X , i" 1 + X 2 m 2 + ■•■ + X nm„ (6.74)
P i
© d )
& )
\ f £ \ / \ ( i V
® 1
© S a ©
h / ? / ®
0
---------- A , — L — h x—
r7 V 7
E xam ple 6.12 F in d (he forces in the m em b ers o f th e tru ss show n in Fig. 6.12a
if P , = P 2 — 10 kips, /! = /!(, an d L /(A E ) is th e sam e fo r each m em ber o f the
stru ctu re. T h e m em b ers are unstressed w hen P i = P 2 = 0, an d stresses d o
n o t exceed th e elastic lim it.
"4.0 0 .5 lp f 1l _ r - 4 2 . 4 2 l
_0.5 4.0J U J ~~ L - 70.70J
By carry in g o u t th e m atrix inversion, th e u n k n o w n s a re o b ta in e d :
X i = -8 .5 3 and X 2 = - 1 6 .6 0
T able 6.3
1 0 1.000 0 0 0 1.0 0 0 -8 .5 3
2 0 0 1.000 0 0 0 1.0 0 -1 6 .6 0
3 -1 0 -0 .7 0 7 0 7.07 0 0.5 0 0 -3 .9 7
4 0 -0 .7 0 7 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 + 6.03
leaving th e^ram e statica lly d ete rm in a te b a se stru c tu re as for E xam ple 6.12.
T h e v alues for S Q an d s 2 a rc the sam e as for E x am p le 6.12, b u t values o f ^
m ust be calc u lated a s sh o w n in Fig. 6.l3/>. T h e term s involving S„ a n d .^ are
therefore the sam e as th o se calcu lated in T ab le 6.3, ex cep t th a t th e value of
L/{AE) is now 0.01 fo r each m em ber, w hereas a v alu e o f 1.0 w as used in
T ab le 6.3. F o r c o n sta n t values o f L j(A E ) for all m em bers, Eq. (6.71) m a y be
w ritten as
T ab le 6.4
*i S qS i *1*1 S, kips
(1) (2) (3) (4) IS)
2 0 0 0 0 —8.90
3 0 0 0 0 - 10.00
4 0 0 0 0 0
5 -1 .4 1 4 -2 0 0 2.0 t,.09
6 1.0 -1 0 0 1.0 -0 .0 7
7 1.0 -2 0 -0.7 0 7 1.0 -3 .7 7
8 - 1 .0 -1 0 0.707 1.0 6.23
9 -1 .4 1 4 -4 0 -1 .4 1 4 2.0 5.33
10 2.0 -6 0 -1 .4 1 4 4.0 -3 .8 4
11 1.0 -2 0 -0.707 1.0 -3 .7 7
12 - 2 .0 -6 0 0 4.0 10.14
Total -2 4 0 -3 .5 3 5 T&o
DKFLF.CTION ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS 179
T ab le 6.4 show s the calc u latio n s for th e q u a n titie s used in Eq. (6.71). It
also gives the final results o f the in tern al lo a d s in each m em ber.
10 kips
60
(/>)
.V, T I
7777
(c) («0
12 ft *kip kip
i— r
10 kips
Z~777Z
\d J
,V,= I i s rt-kip 18 ft-kip
(<?) in
F igure 6.14
1 8 0 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
the left s u p p o rt, th e rem ain in g stru c tu re is stab le a n d statically d eterm in ate.
The tw o force c o m p o n e n ts an d th e c o u p le, X u X 2 , a n d X 3 , are assu m ed to
be re d u n d a n t reactio n s. T h e b en d in g -m o m en t d ia g ra m for th e b ase stru c tu re
u n d e r th e a ctio n o f th e applied lo ad is show n in F ig . 6.14b. All b en d in g
m o m en ts a re p lo tte d o n th e co m p ressio n side o f th e m em bers a n d a re n o t
d esig n ated as p o sitiv e o r negative. T h e p ro d u c t o f tw o bending m o m en ts is
positive if th ey a re b o th p lo tted on the sam e side o f th e m em ber. T h e b en d in g
m o m en ts m t , m 2 , a n d m 3 d u e to un it v alues o f th e re d u n d a n ts a re p lo tte d in
Figs. 6.14c, d, a n d e. T h e v ario u s deflection term s a re ev alu ated sem i-
g rap h ically , b y reference to the m o m en t diag ram s.
E I S t0 = d x = 180 x 2 = 360
£/<■>,, = m l d x = 2 x 18 x 4 + 6 x 9 x 6 = 468
E l 5 12 = m \ d x = 40.5 x 6 + 54 x 9 = 729
E I S I3 — = — 1 x 1 8 x 2 — 1 x 54 = —90
E / S 23 = m 2m 3 d x = 1 x 40.5 + 1 x 54 = 94.5
468.0 - 4 0 5 .0 - 9 0 . 0 X i - 3 6 0 .0
- 4 0 5 .0 729.0 94.5 X 2 1620.0
- 9 0 .0 94.5 21.0J 180.0
d P = —2 / s f d x (6.75)
f s = 97 (6.76)
(6.78)
dx dx
d 2P
= k 2P (6.79)
dx1
w here
2tG ( 1 l
k2 = (6.80)
bE 2AX
P = C ,e k* + C 2 e ~ kl (6.81)
(6.83)
Pokb
6 = (6.84)
2 tG
Figure 6.17
184 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
P 0 e -kx (6.85)
4G(\/h) + l/c
w here k2 = (6.86)
A E ( l/ t) + l / t t
(6.87)
_f s 200 x 10
= 0.025 in
~ G ~ 0.020 x 4,000,000
If th e cro ss se ctio n a t th e su p p o rt is re stra in e d from w arping, th e cen te r
strin g er resists a co m p ressio n force sm aller th a n 40,000 Ib a n d the c o rn e r strin g
ers resist c o m p ressio n forces larg er th a n 20,000 Ib. T h e force P 0 a ctin g as sh o w n
Figure 6.18
DEFLECTION ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS 185
Figure 6.19
or k = 0.04
P = lO.OOOe'0-04*
f s = 10,000e - ° '04*
18 6 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
T ab le 6.5
0 1 10,000 200
5 0.817 8,170 163
10 0.670 6,720 134
20 0.450 4,500 90
40 0.202 2,020 40
KM 0.019 190 4
PROBLEMS
6.1 Find the displacements of point 3 or the truss structure shown in Fig. P6.1. Assume ! in2 for the
area of cach m em ber and £ = 107 lb/in2. y
DEFLECTION ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS 187
6.2 Find the rotation of member 4-5 of the truss structure shown in Fig. P6.2. Area = 1 in2 and
£ = 107 Ib/in2 for all members.
20 kips
Figure P6.2
6.3 Find the displacements (translation and rotation) of points 2 and 3 of the beam structure shown
in Fig. P6.3. Assume that the beam has a uniform area.
6.4 You are given a simply supported beam under the action of a uniformly distributed load, as
shown in Fig. P6.4. Find the midspan deflection, using Castigiiano’s theorem.
P Ib/in
El = constant
Figure P6.4
y ? 50 lb/in
r f . i i E L T
-100 in- -100 in- -1 0 0 in - -1U0 in—
Figure P6.9
6.9 Use the finite difference m ethod to find the moments and shears at the locations indicated on the
beam structure shown in Fig. P6.9.
6.10 A square plate o f uniform thickness i is fixed at two opposite edges and simply supported at the
other two opposite edges. Using the finite difference method, find the maximum displacements and
bending m oments. Assume that the plate is under the action of a uniform normal pressure P. Use
Poisson's ratio v = 0.25.
6.11 Analyze the truss of Fig. 6.8. assuming that L/(AE) is constant for all members. Analyze the
truss of Fig. 6-8 for a horizontal load of 20 kips at B, in addition to the vertical load shown. Assume
A E is constant for all members.
6.12 Analyze the truss of Fig. 6.8 assuming there is an additional m ember AC with a cross-section
area of 3 in2. T ake B'D as the redundant.
6.13 Repeat Prob. 6.12, assuming BC is the redundant member. '-•i
6.14 Repeat Prob. 6.12, assum ing that member BD is 0.1 in too long because of manufacturing
tolerances. Assume no external loads on the structure.
6.15 Analyze the structure of Fig. 6.9 if load P is acting horizontally at the same point. Assume a
constant value of E l. ■ j.
6.16 Analyze the structure of Fig. 6.9 for the loading shown, assuming the supports to be spread
horizontally a distance of O.S in. Use R = 50 in, P = 2 kips, 1 = 1.0 in4,a n d E = 10,000 kips/in2.
6.17 Analyze the structure of Fig. 6.10, assuming the 2-kip load to be applied at the point w hife the
tube is bent.
6.18 Repeal Example fi. 12, assuming It — 40 in, /il = 3 0 in, and A E = 10,000 kips for each member.
6.19 Repeat Example 6.13, if It = 40 in, /i, = 30 in, and A E = 10,000 kips for each member. Member
12 has a length of 10 in.
6.20 Repeat Prob. 6.19 assuming member 12 is a redundant in place of the reaction X ,.
6.21 Analyze the frame of Fig. 6.14a, assuming the left support to be pin-connecled and the right
support to be fixed.
6.22 Analyze the frame of Fig. 6 .14u. assuming an additional load of 20 kips to act down at the
center of the structure. '
6.23 O btain the bending-momcnt diagram for the frame shown ill Fig. P6.2.1 to P6.25 if / ’ -- 0 and
W = 4.0 kips/ft.
6.24 O btain the bending-momcnt diagram for the frame shown in Fig. P6.23 to P6.25 if W — 0,
P = 10 kips, and a = h — 4.5 ft.
DEFLECTION ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS 189
P
■h.
W kips/ft
6 ft
I • 1 = 0.75
7= 1.0 / = 1.0 6 ft
1
•9 ft Figure P6.23 to P6.25
6*25 O btain the bending-moment diagram for the fram e shown in Fig, P623 to P6.25 if W = 0,
P = 10 kips, a = 3 ft, and b = 6 ft.
6.26 The frame for a fuselage o f rectangular cross section is shown in Fig. P6.26 to P6.28. Calculate
the bending moments if W — 3 kips and a = 1.5 f t Assume E l is constant
6.27 Repeat Prob. 6.26 if E l for the bottom frame mem ber is 4 times as large as the value of E l for
the other members.
6.28 Repeat Prob. 6.26 if 2 W = 6 kips and a = 3.0 ft.
6 ft
6.29 Use the principle of virtual displacements to establish the relationship between the applied
forces and corresponding displacements on the beam structure shown in Fig. P6.29. This relationship
is of the form {Q =* [$]{<?}.
Cl, A E
\
\
L
Figure P6.29
6.30 Repeal Prob. 6.29 except Ihe beam is as shown in Fig. P6.30.
CHA PTER
SEVEN
FINITE ELEM ENT STIFFNESS M ETHOD IN
ST RUC TURA L ANALYSIS
7.1 I N T R O D U C T I O N
190
FINITE ELEMENT STIFFNESS METHOD IN STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS 191
Figure 7.1
192 A IRCRAFT STRUCTURES
Figure 7.2
FINITE ELEMENT STIFFNESS METHOD IN STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS 1 93
F igure 73
194 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
(c)
Figure 7.4 Structural elements, (a) Truss element; (ft) beam element; (<r) membrane plate element, (i/)
plate bending elements.
FINITE ELEMENT STIFFNESS METHOD IN STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS 195
Figure 7.5 Structural elements, (a) Shell elem ents; (b ) three-dim ensional elements.
196 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
7.5 C O O R D IN A T E S Y ST E M
Truss structure
x 2
(*)
Figure 7.6 G lobal and local axes elements, (n) C oordinate system: (/i) ,v, v = global axes for structure;
.*i, y i = local axes for element 1: v , . y j = local axes for element 2.
FINITE ELEMENT STIFFNESS METHOD IN STRUCTURAL/ANALYSIS 1 97
/. L <5x
fl f,
h S. <53 (7.1)
u mx <*4 o,
/5 m, 9,
J* J _<56 _ J z_
LM ,, 0y
■e
F z , 52
M z, 6 ,
m en t vectors a re re p re se n ted as
v r r / ,i ~&ix~
fz 4 <52 5iy
fz fj* <5*
k fjy s* tjy
fs fkx ds K
_ /« _ _fky_
h = /i + /! + fi + fi + fi + /! (7.2)
f& = f e + / 2 + / e + /<s + / « + / *
fm = E / i = E /» (m = 1, 2, ..., 6) (7.3)
n —1 n= 1
w here = / ” = force in d u ced in the d irectio n o f c o o rd in a te force m as a result
o f the n o d al c o o rd in a te d isp lacem en t n a n d [„ is th e to ta l m co o rd in a te force
resulting from all p o ssib le c o o rd in a te d isp lacem en ts (n = 1, 2 , . . . , ) , as show n in
Fig. 7.9.
I, 2. . . . . 6 = possible
coordinate nodal
displacem ent
L = I (in = 1, 2 , . . . . 6) (7.5)
n= 1
w here k,„„ is referred to as a c o n sta n t stiffness coefficient w ith d im ensions o f force
p er u n it d isp lacem e n t a n d is defined a s th e force in d u c e d in the d irec tio n o f '
c o o rd in a te m d u e to a u n it d isp lacem en t ap p lied in the d ire ctio n o f n o d al c o o rd i
n ate n.
In m a trix form , Eq. (7.5) m ay be re w ritte n as
/ r ki L Sl
fi &21 k 22- <52
h = ^31 ^32 k-33 sy m m etric '-53 (7.6)
u ka k .i2 k*3 ^4-4. <5*
h k 51 ksi k$3 ^54 ^55 <5s
h _ k f ,i k&2 ^63 ^64 ^65 ^66- <5*
(7.7)
w here { / } a n d {<5} a re th e colum ns o f force an d d isp lacem en t vectors, resp ec
tively, a n d {k} is a sq u a re m a trix o f the stiffness coefficients.
E q u a tio n (7.7) form s th e b asis o f th e stiffness m e th o d a n d establishes th e
co n d itio n s o f sta tic equilibrium .
F o r elem en t relatio n sh ip s, Eq. (7.7) ta k e s th e form
{/«} = M - y (7.8)
200 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
[K] = X [ f c j (7.10)
Ml—1
'{ F 0r ■ { A J“
(7.11)
M . _ [K J ZKrrl
E x p a n d in g E q. (7.11) yields
{ V l = [ K J [ A „ } + [A -J{ A r} (7.13)
Element 1 :
fix - 0 .5 - 0 .5 0 0 0 .5 0 .5 ^x
- 0 .5 - 0 .5 0 0 0 .5 0 .5
Element 22 ::
J lx 0 0 0 0 0 O' p » ,l
fy 0 0 0 0 0 0 K
fix = 4 x 10 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 hx (b)
h>- 0 0 0 1 0 1 s 2V
fix 0 0 0 0 0 0 $3x
0 0 0 -1 0 1 L<53 V_
i tv
t" fix
fix
2
fl?
• r a = i o kips
* u “ 0.5 0.5 0 0 - 0 .5 - 0 .5 . , 0
R ly 0.5 0.5 0 0 - 0 .5 -0 .5 0
R ix 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rzy = 4 X 103 0 0 0 1 0 -1 0 (c)
E q u a tio n (c) m ay be e x p an d e d as
a
1
o
R lx - 0 .5 - 0 .5
R ly - 0 .5 - 0 .5
= 4 x 103
R 2x 0 0 *3,, (e)
0 -1
..F ro m E q. (d), after th e red u ced ag g reg ate stiffness m a trix is in v erted , th e
'd isp lacem en ts are
A3 i = 0.075 in
A 3y = 0.025 in
R ly = — 10 k ip s R 2y = 10 kips
h x = - 1 0 kips f2 x = 0
f 3} = 10 kips / 3, = - 1 0 k ips
the form
(7 .1 4 )
w here { /} rep resen ts th e elem ent forccs, [£ ] rep resen ts th e elem ent stiffness
m atrix, and {<?} rep re sen ts th e elem ent d isplacem ents.
D ep en d in g o n th e type o f elem ent b ein g co n sid ered , o n e o f three m e th o d s
m ay be con v en ien tly selected to establish th e basic elem en t re latio n sh ip for finitc-
elem ent analysis: d irect m eth o d , m eth o d o f w eighted resid u als, an d energy m e
th o d s in co n ju n c tio n w ith v a riatio n al p rinciples. A lth o u g h to cover th eo ry d ev el
o p m en t is n o t th e in te n t o f this text, a b rie f d esc rip tio n o f th e first an d th ird
m eth o d s is presen ted .
D ir e c t M e th o d
qx{x) = C[ + c 2x ib)
or
as (d)
(e)
,
8
{q} = l N i N j~ - N J Sj (7.15)
l^ j
w here Six
{5;} = (7.16)
(9)
- { - 1 a s
T h e g en eral form o f E q. (/) m ay be w ritten as
or, in general,
m s
L .J jx J L
lo j (j)
{ /} = [ # ] { £ } (7.21)
w here [ / / ] is a m atrix w hich relates b o u n d a ry stresses to eq uivalent elem en t
n o d al forces.
U tilizing Eq. (/) in E q. (j) yields the final resu lt:
[£KU -iia
In g eneral, E q. (k) m ay be w ritte n as
i f ) = [H ][/)][G ]{ 5 }
or { /} = (7.22)
Energy Methods
T he energy m eth o d s in finite-clem ent fo rm u latio n s a re b a sed o n (1) w ork a n d
strain energy a n d on (2) co m p lem en tary w o rk an d c o m p le m e n ta ry strain energy
in c o n ju n c tio n w ith calcu lu s o f v ariatio n . In th e first case, th e m eth o d s yield the
elem ent stiffness m atrix , w hile in the seco n d th e m eth o d s yield th e elem ent flexi
bility m atrix . In this section, only elem en t stiffness m a trix fo rm u latio n is p re
sented.
From the principle of virtual work and virtual strain energy, the finite-
2 0 6 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
{<?} = W W (7.15a)
(D = I W A (7.18)
{E ) = [G]{<5} (7.17)
an d ' ^ = I A |{ /} (7.25)
SU |_<5£J{2;} d V (7.26)
3W = ld 5 j{f} (7.27)
dU = L ^ J [ G ] r [D ][G ]{ ^ } d V (7.29)
or
ra w = { /} (7.31)
ra = J [g]t [d][g] dv ^ 7 .3 2 )
- i r
[G ] = (<3 )
. L L_
-1
[G ] T =
L
I
(b)
L
M = [E ] (c)
FINITE ELEMENT STIFFNESS METHOD IN STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS 2 0 7
" -1 "
L L
[* ] = [£ ] dV
1 1
L _ L _
JL —
L2 13
dA dx
-E E_
L2 L2
AE 1 - i
L ■1 1
w h ic h , a g a i n , is t h e s a m e r e s u lt a s in p r e v i o u s t r e a t m e n t s .
7.9 E L E M E N T S H A P E F U N C T I O N S
P o ly n o m ia l M e th o d s :
A ny fu n ctio n can be rep resen ted by a p o ly n o m ia l series as follow s:
® = I P. = L ^ JW (7.33)
n= 0
w here the p o ly n o m ia l P„ o f an y o rd e r n m a y be w ritte n in tw o dim ensions as
/’. = E W - y (7.34)
2 0 8 A IRCRAFT STRUCTURES
9xix) = Po + P i — C 0o + C 10 * + £ ? i y
{q} = M e } (7-35)
T h e c o lu m n m a trix {c} m u st be d eterm in ed so th a t E q. (7.35) is satisfied for all
n o d a l d isp lacem en ts {<5}; th a t is
~ - {5} = [ ^ { c } (7.36)
and (7-37)
H en ce E q . (7.35) becom es
{q} = l P J L X ] - l { t } = m { S } (7-38)
w here [ N ] is th e m a trix o f th e sh ap e function.
T o fu rth e r illu stra te th e selection o f d isp lacem en t fu n ctio n p olynom ials, c o n
sid e r a p la n e stress tria n g u la r elem en t a s sh o w n in F ig. 7.12. C o n sid er th a t th e
elem en t h a s o n ly th re e n o d al p o in ts, in w h ich case th e to ta l n u m b e r o f n o d a l
c o o rd in a te disp lac em e n ts is 6. T h e disp lacem en ts a t a n y p o in t o n th e elem ent a re
® = Q >o + C | 0 x + C n }'
qx = C t + C 2 x + C 3 y
qy = C4 + C s .< + C 6 y
Ml MI Ml S2 Zl
— - + — L H----- - + ---- dx ( 7 .4 0 )
E l, E It GJ AE A fi
M = g A fd S = g 2(fd V = gM )
T hus
U = G(f<)
fu *1
f, 0 *4,
f>, 0 0 K , sh
M„ 0 0 0
0 0 “ *2j- 0 *3,
M„ 0 ^2* 0 0 0 **
0 0 0 0 0 ki **
fl,
0 -* 4 . 0 0 0 0 k+t *Jr
h,
0 0 — k+y 0 k Zy 0 0 0 **
4
0 0 0 ~ k5 0 0 0 0 0 k$ o*
0 0 — k 2y 0 Q 0 0 k 2y 0 *3, Ojr
0 fc2z 0 0 0 0 —^2* 0 0 0
y (7 .4 i)
D2U d 2U
dqt di]j ~~ dqj dqt
w here
1 •
b b
L- _ £± / 1
4r — , „ *62 — ,
0 a5 b
. 2 L [}
/) = (f3 ((4 — a 2 = —— a2 =
/4 £ ' 2EL
13 L L L
° J ~ 3E lz + A 0 G E IZ Us ~ G J
{ /} = (7.42)
w here th e o v e rb a r d e n o tes reference to th e local axes.
S tru c tu ra l system s arc defined as an assem b lag e o f s tru c tu ra l elem ents which
m ay be ra n d o m ly o rie n te d in space. In o rd e r to fo rm u la te th e stru c tu ra l system
force-dispiacem cnt eq u a tio n s, all elem ent re la tio n sh ip s su ch as Eq. (7.42) m u st be
transform ed to a c o m m o n set o f stru c tu re g lo b a l axes x , y. a n d z.
F ro m v ecto r m a th e m a tic s it can be sh o w n th a t a n y se t o f th ree o rth o g o n al
axes .y, _v, a n d 5 c an be expressed in term s o f a n o th e r set o f o rth o g o n a l axes x, y,
a n d z by
{ r} = K J { r } (7.44)
[T ]{ /> =
or { /} = [T ] - (7.46)
[ T ] = [T ]r
m = Z W (7.48)
i= 1
w here m is th e to ta l n u m b e r o f elem ents w hich m a k e u p th e stru c tu re . N o te th a t
in o rd e r to c a rry o u t th e su m m a tio n in Eq. (7.48), th e o rd e r of[fc;] m u s t be m ad e
c o m p atib le w ith th e o rd e r o f th e a n tic ip a te d stru c tu re m a trix [ X ] . T his c a n be
d o n e by filling zero a rra y s co rre sp o n d in g to all n o d al forces a n d c o rre sp o n d in g
disp lacem en ts n o t co n n e cte d w ith th e n o d es w h ich a p p e a r o n th e elem ent b eing
considered.
T o illustrate, c o n sid e r th e stru c tu re sh o w n in F ig . 7.15. F o r each elem ent, th e
stiffness m atrix e q u a tio n is fo rm u lated in a c c o rd a n c e w ith E q. (7.46). E ach el
em en t is identified by its connectivity. F o r ex am p le, elem en t 1 h a s connectivities
1. 3, an d 4 ; elem ent 2 has th e co nnectivities 1 a n d 2 ; etc. E ac h elem ent stillness
m atrix [A] is placed in the a p p ro p ria te lo c a tio n o f the g lo b al m atrix in acco rd -
© © ©
F igure 7.15 C o n stru ctio n o f stru c tu re re latio n sh ip from elem ent relations.
214 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
ance w ith its connectiv ity . E ach d o t m ay rep resen t a single coefficient o r a su b
m atrix o f coefficients if m o re th a n one degree o f freedom is being considered a t
the node. O n ce th is is d o n e for each elem ent, a sim ple alg eb raic su m m atio n is
perform ed w hich yields th e stru c tu re stiffness m a trix e q u atio n . A pplying the
b o u n d a ry c o n d itio n s will resu lt in a red u ced ag g reg ate stru c tu re stiffness m atrix
e q u atio n w hich ca n be solved for th e u n k n o w n d isp lacem en ts. Back su b stitu tio n
of these d isp lacem en ts in to each elem ent e q u a tio n will yield elem ent internal
forces.
Rn
R ii sy m m etric
AE R u R l3 R l l Rl3 Rh
r a s l= ; -R u -R n R x 2 RuRu i? u (7.49)
— R h R s2 -Rh — R l2 R l3 R11R12 R*2
—R i i R u R \ 2Ra Ri 3 R11R13 R 12 R13 R f3
Xj ~ X;
w here R u =
L
y’i - y*
R 12 =
L
R i3 =
' E = Y o u n g ’s m o d u lu s
T h e p lan e tru ss is sh o w n in Fig. 7.16/j. Its g lo b al stiffness m atrix is
h- djx 5jy
Rh sy m m etric
AE
( 7 .5 0 )
W P, = RiiRu Rfi
-Ri. —Ri 1R12 Rh
-R11R12 -Rh Ri\R 12 R\2
"1
I
Figure 7.16 Beam dem ents, (a) Space truss element: {h) plane truss elem ent; (c) plane frame element;
(//) space frame element.
216 a ir c r a f t s tru c tu re s
a sy m m etric
b d
■
M Pr = c e f (7.51)
~a -b —c a
~b -d ~e b d
c e 9 —c —e f
c = Ru& zz d = R\ 2 a t + R 2 2 ®4i
e = i?22a 2i /= « 3 x ff = «6z
>y - r . R */ ~ *
Rl l~ L
Xi
2"11/2
L = [(x j - x , ) 2 + (} ’j - y j ]
AE G El. 4 £ /_
«2z = a 3*
L 1}
12 E I, 2 E I.
a 6z ~ '
1 0 0
2 100 0
3 100 100
4 0 100
HNITK ELEMENT STIFFNESS METHOD IN STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
50 kips
(A)
Figure 7.17 Plane truss and frame structures.
Member no.
(and its nodes) ••1, ill2 E, lb/in’ I., in
1 d -2 ) 2 !07 UK)
2 (2 3) 2 I07 100
3 (2-4) 2^2 107 100^2
* 2 - -V! 100
11 L 100
and * i2 = Z i^ 2i = 0
R, | = 0 and R L2 = 1
F o r m em b er 3,
K n = V'4 ~ ** = 0 - 1 0 0 / 1 0 0 = - y / l / 2
V4 - .V’
Rn =
2 1 8 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
T h e k n o w n b o u n d a ry c o n d itio n s a re :
1 0 -1 0
0 0 0 0
M em b e r I: 2 x 105 («)
-1 0 1 0
0 0 0 0_
~0 0 0 0
0 1 0 _ 1
M em ber 2: 105 ib)
0 0 0 0
_0 -1 0 1_
/
[k ]8 *8 = I W 8
o 1
0 0
sy m m etric
- 1 0 1
0 0 0 0 +
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0.
FINITE ELEMENT STIFFNESS METHOD IN STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS 2 1 9
© 0
0 0 sym m etric
0 0 0
0 0 0 1
0 0 0 0 0 +
0 0 0 -1 0 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Q
0 0 sy m m etric
0 0 0.5
0 0 - 0 .5 0.5
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 -0 .5 0.5 0 0 0.5
0 0 0.5 - 0 .5 0 -0 .5 0.5
1
0 0 sy m m etric
-1 0 1.5
0 0 - 1 .5 1.5
(d)
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 -1 0 1
0 0 -0 .5 0.5 0 0 0.5
0 0 0.5 -0 .5 0 -0 .5 0 .5 .
"R u “ i 1 sy m m etric 0
R \y 0 0 1 0
10* - ! 1.5 (h x
°!
- 10* 0 -0 .5 1.5
1 °!
2 x IO5 * 3 ,
— 0 o 1 0 0 0 0
* 3 , 0 0 I 0 -1 0 1 0
R*x 0 0 1 - 0 .5 0.5 0 0 0.5 0
0 0.5 - 0 .5 0 0 -0 .5 0.5 _ 0
_ °l
(e)
T h e u n k n o w n s a rc S 2,x . S 2)., and all th e reactio n s R l x , R iy , etc. T h u s, ex tract-
2 2 0 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
R lx = - { 2 x 105)(<52.J = - 5 * R ix = 0
R ly ~ *
R&x= R* 5*
10 kips
5 kips 5 kips
t
3
1 ©
©
'fix *0 0 0 O' ’ 0.025- " 0 ”
0 1 0 1 -0.025 -5 *
fly = 2 x 105
fix 0 0 0 0 0 0
J iy _ 0 -1 0 1 0 5*
FINITE EI.l-MENT STIFFNESS METHOD IN STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS 221
x coordinate, y coordinate,
Joint no. in in
i "0 0
2 0 600
3 240 600
4 240 0
M em b er 2:
*11 i Rn = = o
=
A / ember 3:
.\*4 — A*j >4 ~ >’2
Rn = = 0 R.,= = - 1
r -m = r Rn = 0
1
Element I : Ru =
U-V2 — -X i)“ + 0 '2 — J l ) 2 ] ' /2 ^ / l
Element 2: —y 2 < 0
.'. R , , = 0 R l2 = - 1
0.5 S\
F] 0.5 0.5 6\
/ ’2 - 0 . 5 - 0 . 5 0.5 Si
F y2 = 4 x 10 5 —0.5 - 0 . 5 0.5 0.5 ,55 (a)
0 0 0 0 0
n
/•$ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,55 j
FINITF- rj.nMr.NT STIFTNFSS METHOD IN STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS 2 2 3
4 x 10 7
^
Element 2:
H
4 x 10s
II
_ 1
^2 1 0 0
p i “I ~ 0
FI 0 0 sy m m etric <p;
F'z 0 0 0 <5'I
p; = 4 x 10s 0 0 0 1 .0 <K (h)
/•'J 0 U 0 0 0
1.0
o
1
0 0 0 l «5j
C arry in g o u t th e m atrix a d d itio n o f th e elem ent stiffness m atrices in Eqs.
la) and (/>), the stiffness m atrix re la tio n sh ip for th e e n tire stru c tu re becom es
0.5 0
10 * -0 .5 - 0 . 5 0.5 <51
0 4 x 10 5 -0 .5 - 0 . 5 0.5 1.5 (c)
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 - 1 .0 0 1.0 0
0.75 - 0 .2 5 '
10'
-0.25 0.25
<5i = 0.075 in
S-l = - 0 .0 2 5 in
- 2 x 1 0 5 - 2 x 1 0 5 [_—0.025_ _ — 1 0 4_
R ir.
4 x 10SJL —0.025. - 10 \
I
1
2 2 4 AIRCRAI-T STRUCTURES
Fi 0.5 0 - 10 4~
F\ 0.5 0.5 sy m m etric q - 1 0 4
n 0 1 sy m m etric —0.25 - 10 “
Fl = 4 x 10 5 0 0 0 0 0 lb
-F l_ . 0 - 1 0 1 0 104
104 104 lb
1I 104 lh
IUJ Ib
Beam 2:
H„ = 0 * 1 2 = - 1
Rn = l R 22 = 0
FI - 0 .1 9 9 7 - 0 .2 0 0 3 - 0 . 0 3 0.1997 0.2003 iS
>*
°2
-0 .0 3 0.03 2 0.03 - 0 .0 3 J l .
Beam 2:
F i ' 0 .0 0 1 2
r * n
sy m m etric
Fl 0 0.4 55
M\ 0.06 0 4 01
Fi = 1 0 6 -0 .0 0 1 2 0 - 0 .0 6 0 .0 0 1 2 <51
FI 0 - 0 .4 0 0 0.4 °3
0.06 0 2 - 0 .0 6 0 4 J l .
0 0 0
a
o
o
FM \ 0 0 0 0.06 0 2.0 - 0 .0 6 0
p 3 l 7.415 - 2 .4 6 8 - 0 .0 3 7 1 ~1 0 4~ 0.07415 in
= 1 0 ~ 6 - 2 .4 6 8 2.488 0.01859 0 = -0 .0 2 4 6 8 in
-0 .0 3 7 1 0.01859 0.1249 _ 0 -0 .0 0 0 3 7 1 ra d z
2 2 6 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
9 9 ft2 Ib 99f.: Hi
I h ■in
3 4 lb
34 Ib
2 b 16 Ib-in
m 2 lb
PROBLEM S
7.1 In ihc following set of algebraic equations, R t, <52, unci arc the unknowns. Put them in a
matrix form, and solve for the unknowns. Use only matrix notation and manipulation.
Ri = S t - 52
p = s l + \.5S2 -0 .5 * 3
2P = - 0.5*2 + 0.5S3
7.2 A structure is acted on by the forces shown in Fig. P7.2. IT the materia! behavior is given by
ff - K t:\ where K is a constant, find the strain energy stored in the system. Neglect tiie dead weight,
and assume A E to he constant. *
t
t1 Uniformly distributed
Q
I load, p lb/in
t
t
XXXNX Figure P7.2
FINITE KLEMENT STIFFNESS METHOD IN STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS 2 2 7
7 3 Find the m atrix relationship {Q} — for the truss structure shown in Fig. P7.3. Note:
Assume A E lo be constant and the same for both members.
7.4 Given the truss structures shown in Fig. P7.4, determ ine the following information for each:
{«) The external nodal applied loads to be used
(h) The known displacement boundary conditions
(c) The size of the element stiffness matrix
(c/) The size of the structure reduced stiffness matrix
Figure P7.4 (</) Planar truss; {/>) planar truss: (c) space truss.
2 2 8 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
7.5 Using the finite element m ethod, determine the reactions, displacements and internal loads for the
planar truss structure shown below. Show all the Jelails.
10 kips
7.6 W rite m athem atical expressions which will determine for any structure (a) the order of the
aggregate stiffness m atrix and (/>) the order of the reduced aggregate stiffness matrix. Illustrate the use
of the derived expressions on structures shown in Fig. P7.6.
(o)
Figure P7.6 (i/) Plane frame; (f>) plane truss; (r) space frame; (J) space truss.
7.7 Find the joint loads which must he used in the finite-element analysis of the frame structure
shown in Fig. P7.7.
AT = 100 F
F igure P7.7
FINITE ELEMENT STIFFNESS METHOD IN STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS 2 2 9
7.8 Show how you would go about analyzing Ihe beam on continuous elastic foundation shown in
Fig. P7.S by using Ihe linite-elemcnl technique.
Ueam
1*7.8
7.9 What displacement functions would you use lo develop the stiffness matrix relationship for cach
of the element* shown in Fig. P7.9?
<«)
Figure 1*7.9 (c/> Axial rod element ideal i/cd into four
nodes; (/>) plate element (in plane forces only); six
nodes.
7.10 Find the strain-energy expression per unit volume of a structural m ember whose stress-strain
behavior is related as
a —fe"
where c and n are constants.
7.11 Find the total displacement of point 2 on the truss structure in Fig. P 7 .ll. Assume £ = 107
lb/in2 and cross-sectional area of cach member = 2 in2.
Figure P7.1I
cl x — a i + ^2* + <7* “ h i + b 2 x + b 3 y
7.13 Show the structure global axes and each element's axes for the structure in Fig. P7.I3.
7.14 An axial rod element is idealized as shown in Fig. P7-I4. The displacement function f/(v) is
assumed lo be
qfx) = c, + c2.v + r 3x 2
Figure 1*7.14
7.15 Derive the stiffness coefficients for the element shown in Fig. P7.I5.
7.16 Illustrate by means of sketches the physical significance o f the stiffness coefficients correspond
ing lo the actions shown in Fig. P7.16.
Qi
Qi
Figure P7.16
7.17 Find the coefficients of the transformation matrices for cach of the truss structure elements
shown in..Fig. P7.17.
Figure P7.17
J-'INITK l-I.HMHNT STII-TNHSS MKTHOD IN STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS 231
7.18 Find the equivalent nodal loads lo be used in the finite-element analysis for each of the struc
tures in Fig. P7.18. You are given that
7.19 The radius of a tapered, solid, tubular shaft clement varies as follows:
R = R 0 , p — const
Assuming that only torsional loads can be transm itted, find the stiffness m atrix of the element.
7.20 The nodal displacements of the truss structure shown in Fig. P7.2G were found by the finite
element lo be
d2x = - 0 .0 2 in Slr = -0 .0 1 in
7.21 Determine the displacements and the internal loads for the truss structure shown in Fig. P7.21.
Assume a cross-sectional area of 1 in*1 for each rod and a m odulus of elasticity of 107 Ib/in2. Use the
stiffness method.
2 3 2 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
7.22 In cach of Ihe structures in Fig. P7.22, determine the internal loads an d the deflections. Use the
slifl'ness matrix m ethod only.
Kijjurc P7.22 (a) Rigid frame: all members are made or 2-in tubing with 3/8-in wall thickness, (b)
T russ: 2-in tubing; 3/8-in wall thickness.
CHAPTUR
EIGHT
ANALYSIS OF TYPICAL MEMBERS
OF SEMIM ONOCOQUE STRUCTURES
8.1 I N T R O D U C T I O N
8.2 D I S T R I B U T I O N O F C O N C E N T R A T E D L O A D S T O
T H IN W E B S
M o dern a irc ra ft stru c tu re s arc c o n stru cte d p rim arily from sh eet m etal. T he m etal
is necessary fo r a co v erin g an d this is utilized fo r stru c tu re as well. T he thin sheets
o r w ebs a re very efficient in resisting sh e a r o r ten sio n lo a d s o n the planes o f the
webs, b u l u su ally th ey m u st be stiffened b y m e m b e rs m o re cap ab le o f resisting
com pression lo ad s a n d lo ad s n o rm al to th e w eb. W h en n o stiffening m em bers are
used a n d the skin o r shell is designed to resist all loads, th e c o n stru ctio n is called
manocoque, o r fu l l monocoque, from th e F re n c h w o rd m e a n in g “ shell o n ly .” U su
ally it is n o t feasible to have the skin th ick e n o u g h to resist com pression lo ad s.
2 3 4 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
/O o "
Figure 8.1
ANALYSIS OF TYPICAL MEMBERS OF SF.MIMONOCOQUR STRUCTURES 2 3 5
eq u ilib riu m n f the forces show n in Fig. 8.1/?, P = (q t + q 2)d. T h u s the req u ired
length cl o f the stiffener d ep en d s on the ability o f th e w ebs to resist shear, sincc a
longer stiffener rcd u ees sh ear flows <j, a n d q 2 . T h e end o f th e stiffcncr, p o in t A,
should alw ays be a t a tran sv erse stilTener. If a stiffen er e n d s in the cen te r of a w eb,
it produces a b ru p t ch an g e in the sh e a r Hows a t th e end o f the stiffener an d
un d esirab le c o n c e n tra tio n conditions.
In this e h a p tc r, thin w ehs a te assum ed to resist p u re sh e a r a lo n g their b o u n d
aries. In ac tu a l stru c tu re s, the thin w ebs m ay w rin k le in sh e a r, th u s in tro d u cin g
tension field stresses in a d d itio n to those c alcu lated . T h e effects o f tension field
stresses nre c a lc u la te d in la te r ch ap te rs. I t is fo u n d a t th a t tim e th a t the ten sio n
field stresses can be su p erim p o sed readily o n th o se c a lc u la te d by the m eth o d s
used here, a n d the m e th o d s used in this c h a p te r rem a in v alid for o b tain in g the
sh ear d is trib u tio n in tension field webs. In so m e cases, th e ten sio n field stresses
pro d u ced by w rin k lin g of the w ebs ind u ce a d d itio n a l ax ial c o m p ressio n lo ad s in
stiffeners. T hese lo a d s sh o u ld be co m p u ted se p a ra te ly a n d a d d e d algebraically to
(lie loads o b ta in e d in (his ch ap te r.
A stu d y o f a sim ple n u m erical ex am p le d e m o n s tra te s th e m eth o d by w hich
loads are d istrib u te d to sh ear webs. T h e b eam sh o w n in Fig. 8.2a is sim ilar to a
w ing rib w hich is s u p p o rte d by sp ars at th e en d s a n d w hich resists the lo a d o f
3000 lb, as show n. T h e stiflcner A B tran sm its this lo a d to th e tw o w ebs in inverse
p ro p o rtio n to th e h o riz o n ta l lengths o f the w ebs, since th e vertical sh ear a t an y
cross section o f th e b eam m u st be in e q u ilib riu m w ith th e e x tern al reaction o n the
beam . T h e axial lo ad in A B is show n in Fig. 8.2c; il varies from 3000 a t B to 0 a t
A. T h e axial lo ad in th e u p p er flange o f the b eam can be o b ta in e d from cither th e
.1
1301)0 III
Figure 8.2
2 3 6 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
+5000 Ib
r-T-T-T— +3000 Ib
(c)
Figure 8 3
ANALYSIS OH TYPICAL MEMBERS OF SEMIMONOCOQUE STRUCTURES 2 3 7
Figure 8.4
238 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
(5.31)
V .-V „ = P
If, for the m o m en t, th e sh e ar resisted by th e in -p lan e c o m p o n e n ts of th e strin g e r
lo ad s is neglected, th e sh e a r flows on the tw o cro ss sectio n s ad jacen t to the rin g
are
(8.2)
and
V> I y d A
<ib = -j- (8.3)
ANAI YSIS C)l TYPICA1. MFMRFRS OF SF.MIMONOCOQUF. STRUCTURES 239
T he load (/ tra n sm iltc d to the p erim eter o f th e ring m u s t equal the difference
betw een r/„ a n d qh , o r
<7 = Qa (8.4)
F ro m l:qs. (8 . 1) to (8.4),
<1 = V dA (8.5)
I
W hen the areas resistin g b ending of the shell are c o n c e n tra te d as flange areas
the integral is replaced by a su m m atio n , as in th e follow ing e q u a tio n :
= y I i'A f (8 .6 )
liq u a tio n s (H.5) aiul (8 .6 ) are correct even w hen th e relieving elTects of the ill-plane
co m p o n en ts o f the strin g er forces are co n sid ered , since th is sh e a r resisted by the
stringers m ust be the sam e on b o th fuselage cro ss sectio n s a d jac en t to the ring, if
the stringers have no a b ru p t change in d ire c tio n a t the ring. T h u s the difference
' r
W
Figure 8.5
240 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
Figure 8.6
Table 8.1
L A r v" 6.2
j = = 15.5 in
1 Z Af 0.4
P V „ 500 V j
9 = y I y Af - M I >’A f
E xam ple 8.2 T h e fuselage b u lk h ead sh o w n in Fig. 8.7 resists a h o rizo n tal
load as show n. T h e strin g e r c o o rd in a tes a re given in co lu m n 3 o f T abic 8.2.
Figure 8.7
2 4 2 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
Table 8.2
* *
'-v
(1) (2) (3) (5) (6) (V) (8) (9) (10)
1 0.05 0 0 0
0 0 140 0 + 16.8
2 0.10 8 0.8 6.4
0.8 15.1 100 1,510 ■h 1.7
3 0.10 10 1.0 10.0
1.8 -3 4 .1 100 -3 ,4 1 0 - 1 7 .3
4 0.10 10 'l.O 10.0
2.8 - 5 3 .0 160 -8 ,4 8 0 -3 6 .2
5 0.05 0 0 0
= f I xAf ( 8 .8 )
, - 1 ° ° ° V' ,
q ~ 2 x 26.4 f
q Q X 2A + E 2A q' + 100C x 10 = 0
or
q 0 = 16.8 lb /in
\ n a i .ysis n r t y p i c a i . m fm k f r s o f sf.m im o n o c o q u f s t r u c t u r e s 2 4 3
8.4 A N A L Y S IS O F W I N G R IB S
In the sim plest type o f w ing stru ctu re, th a t in w hich the b e n d in g stresses are
resisted by only th ree c o n e e n lra tcd flange m em bers, th e skin re a c tio n s on the ribs
can be o b ta in e d from th e eq u a tio n s o f statics. T h ere will be o n ly th ree u n k n o w n
sh ear flows, an d these m a y be o b ta in e d readily from the e q u a tio n s fo r th e eq u ilib
rium o f forces in th e vertical an d d rag d irectio n s a n d for th e equ ilib riu m of
m om ents a b o u t a sp an w ise axis.
T hen th e in tern al stresses in the rib a re o b ta in e d from th e sh ea rs a n d bending
m o m en ts a t the v ario u s cro ss sections. N o rm ally , th ere v/ill be ax ial lo ad s in the
rib in ad d itio n to th e sh ears and b ending m o m en ts; th u s it is necessary to
calcu late b ending m o m e n ts a b o u t a p o in t w ith a vertical p o sitio n c o rresp o n d in g
to the n eu tral axis o f the rib. F o r the rib an aly zed in E x am p le 8.3, we assum e th a t
ail bending m o m en ts a re resisted in the rib flange m em bers a n d th a t all shears are
resisted by th e webs. W ith th ese assu m p tio n s, it is m o re c o n v e n ie n t to calculate
bending m o m en ts a b o u t th e n eu tral axis.
In the m ore gen eral case o f a w ing in w hich the b e n d in g m o m en ts are
resisted by m o re th an th ree flange m em bers, it is n ecessary to d eterm in e the
section p ro p ertie s o r the w ing cross section before the sh e a r re a c tio n s on the ribs
can be found. The p ro b lem is sim ilar to th a t o f calc u latin g re a c tio n s o n fuselage
bulkheads, but it differs in th e co n d itio n th a t the fuselage c ro ss sectio n usually is
sym m etrical, w hereas the w ing cross section seld o m is sy m m etrical. T h u s the skin
sh ear flows, a n d co n seq u e n tly the skin reactio n s o n th e ribs, m u s t b e o b ta in e d b y
the m ore gen eral m e th o d s w hich involve th e p ro d u c t o f in e rtia o f th e cross
section.
T h e so lu tio n o f these e q u a tio n s yields qba= 274, qac = 374, a n d qbc = 566 lb/in .
A t a vertical cross section th ro u g h flange a, th e stresses a re o b ta in e d by
co n sid erin g th e free b o d y sh o w n in F ig. 8.9a. T h e to ta l sh e a r a t th e cross
section is V — 374 x 6 = 2244 lb, a n d th e b e n d in g m o m e n t is
M — 2 x 24 x 374 = 17,940 in • Ib. T h e h o riz o n ta l co m p o n e n ts o f the ax ial
loads in th e flanges are fo u n d from th e b e n d in g m o m e n t as P x = P 2 =
M / 6 = 2990 ib. T h e low er rib flange is h o riz o n ta l a t th is point, b u t the u p p e r
m em b er h a s a slo p e o f 0.4. T h e sh e a r c a rrie d b y th e flange is th erefore
0,2PS = 1448 Ib
(£•)
Figure 8.9
ANALYSIS OF TYPICAL MI-MBKRS OF S1-M1M0N0C00UK STRUCTURES 2 45
E xam ple 8.4 T h e rib show n in Fig. 8.10 tran sfers th e v ertical lo a d o f
10,000 lb to the w ing sp ars a n d to th e w ing skin. F in d th e reac tin g sh ear
flows a ro u n d the p erim eter of the rib, th e s h e a r flows in th e rib w eb, a n d the
axial lo ad s in the to p a n d b o tto m rib flanges.
+ 3 7 5 0 lh (top)
-3 7 5 0 lh (b o tto m )
125 Ib/in
| 375 lb/in •
Figure 8.11
A q = —500 at flanges a an d b
A q = + 5 0 0 at flanges c a n d d
0F q 0 — — 125 Ib/in
(8.9)
(8 .10)
\
2 4 8 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
K
° r 9 — r2 (8.12)
Figure 8.13
ANAI.YSIS OF TYPICAL MEMBERS OF SEMIMONOCOQUE STRUCTURES 2 4 9
(8.13)
F ro m Eqs. (8.13) and (8.14) a n d from the v alu e o f th e sh e a r flow a t the left end,
q 0 = T j( 2 A 0), th e follow ing ex p ressio n for q is o b ta in e d :
(8.15)
7\.sin 2t)
c o s 20
t
I)
sin
lf I
Fifiurc 8.14
2 5 0 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
(8 . 16)
Since the flange m em b ers a t the co rn ers o f the box m u st be in equilibrium for
spanw ise forces, the sh e a r flows qa in th e lo p a n d b o tto m w ebs m ust equal the
averag e sh ear flows for the ta p e red w ebs, as o b ta in e d fro m Eq. (8 .11),
<7n — 9o (8.17)
Ih
a n d from Eq. (8.16),
!h (8.18)
h0
T h e difTbrcnce in s h e a r flows betw een tw o a d ja c e n t w ebs p ro d u ces axial lo ad s in
th e flange m em b er betw een these w ebs. A t an y in te rm e d ia te cross sectiqn o f the
box, th e in -p lan e c o m p o n e n ts o f th e flange lo ad s m u s t be considered ifi a d d itio n
to th e w eb sh ears, in o rd e r to check th e e q u ilib riu m w ith th e ex tern al to rq u e on
the box. A t th e en d cross sections, th e s h e a r flows a re in eq u ilib riu m w ith the
Figure 8,15
ANALYSIS OH TYPICAL MEMBERS OF SEMIMONOCOQUE STRUCTURES 251
(<7o + <7oWio = T
an d su b stitu tin g values from Eq. (8 .17) gives
<?.= „ (8.'19)
T his e q u atio n also can be-derived from the eq u ilib riu m of forces a t the right end
of the box
T
h
ANALYSIS OF TYPICAL MEMBERS OF SEMIMONOCOQUE STRUCTURES 2 5 3
or qi = 750 lb /in
or q 3 — 250 lb /in
20 q2 = 2000
or 52 = 100 lb /in
T h e axial lo ad s in th e flange m em bers can b e fo u n d from a su m m a tio n of sp an -
wise forces:
P„ = 4 0 ta = 3 0 ,0 0 0 lb
ph = 4 0 c /j + 4 0 f/, = 3 4 ,0 0 0 Ib
pc = 4 0 < /3 - 4 0 c /2 = 6000 lb
pd = 4 0 < j3 = 1 0 ,0 0 0 lb
10.000 Ib
Figure 8.18
254 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
W hile these forces satisfy the c o n d itio n s for sta tic eq u ilib riu m , they c a n n o t be
o b tain ed Irom th e flexure form ula. F o r a n o p e n b eam c o n ta in in g only four flange
m em bers, the flange lo ad s are in d ep en d e n t o f th e flange areas. If th e beam has
m o re th an fo u r flanges, o n e m u st co n sid e r th e flange a re a s in estim atin g the
d istrib u tio n o f axial lo ad s. T h is p ro b lem is sta tic a lly in d eterm in ate, a n d usually it
is solved by a p p ro x im a te m ethods.
A c u to u t in a sh o rt len g th o f the w ing stru c tu re aficcts the sh ear flows in th e
ad jac en t sectio n s o f th e w ing w hich have closed to rq u e boxes. F irst c o n sid er a
case in w hich the w ing resists p u re to rsio n . T he sh e a r flow in a c o n tin u o u s elosed
box is
9. = ^ (8 .2 0 )
<9
T his e q u a tio n is d eriv ed from the a ssu m p tio n th a t the flange m em bers resist no
axial loads. At the edges o f the c u to u t, how ever, the flange lo ad s resulting from
differential b en d in g have th eir m axim um values. T hese flange lo ad s are d is
trib u ted to the w ebs, a n d a t som e d istan c e from the c u to u t, the flange lo ad s
becom e zero fo r th e box in p u re to rsio n . T h e d ista n c e a lo n g the sp an required for
the d istrib u tio n o f th e flange lo ad s d ep en d s o n th e relativ e rigidities of the m em
bers, but it will be a p p ro x im a te ly equal to th e w idth o f the cu to u t. T h e sh e a r
flows in the to rq u e b o x a re affected co n sid erab ly by this d istrib u tio n o f load.
T h e re c ta n g u la r to rq u e b o x sh o w n in Fig. 8.19a resists p u re torsion. T h e
low er skin is c u t o u t for the e n tire w id th o f the box, for a length L. T h e effect o f
the c u to u t is a ssu m ed to exten d a d istan ce L alo n g th e sp a n on c ith e r side o f the
c u to u t; therefore, it is n ecessary to co n sid er only the len g th 3 L, w hich is show n.
T h e sh ear flows at the sectio n th ro u g h the c u to u t are sim ilar to those o b ta in e d in
Fig. 8.17b, o r they will be ze ro in th e u p p e r skin a n d 2q, in the sp a r w ebs, w here
q, is the sh e a r flow in a c o n tin u o u s box, as o b ta in e d from Eq. (8.20). T he axial
lo ad s P in th e sp a r flanges a re assu m ed to b e e q u a l on th e in b o a rd a n d o u tb o a rd
sides o f the c u to u t a n d th u s are h alf th e value sh o w n in Fig. 8.17b, or
P = q ,L (8.21)
q J .-q .L ^ -P (8.22)
1/ t A + q2 A = T
Figure 8.19
2 5 6 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
30<72 = 30 x 660
or
q 2 = 660 lb/in
S olving these e q u a tio n s sim u ltan eo u sly yields q , = 1340 lb/in an d q 3 = 1010
lb/in. T h ese co rre c tin g sh e a r flows a re sh o w n in Fig. 8.21« for the stru c tu re
betw een sta tio n s 60 a n d 90. T h e final sh e a r flows in th e c u to u t region a re now
ANALYSIS Ol- TYPICAL MEMBERS OF SEMIMONOCOQUE STRUCTURES 2 5 7
Station .'0
Station
Station
S ta tio n 120
3 0 .0 0 0 lh
30,000 lb
Figure 8.20
Z F . = 30(is - 30<7? = 0
forces on on e o f (he flange areas. F o r the flange m e m b e r show n in Fig. 8.21 cl, the
axial load a t sta tio n 90 is o b tain ed by a ssu m in g no axial lo ad s at the cun ter o f
the c u to u t, s ta tio n 75. F ro m th e sh e a r (lows sh o w n in Fig. 8.21a,
P = 15( 1340 + 660) = 30,000 lb. F rom Fig. 8.2 Id, ’*
12
<n <n
U)
<!’>
990 Ib/in
Figure 8.21
ANALYSIS 0 ): TYPICAL MKMBEKS OH SEM1MONOCOQUH, STRUCTURE 259
< h = — 9o (8-25)
Wj
</<»
iir ~ r ~ r - n T T T T ii
III— - f ------ j ------ — j---------- j- — I-— f —fa
I [ I ____f j ^ _ l_2t_ i ____ /
hi h
JB O S L Je!
L M
«/:
’ \ n \'
-l— U - L \
I
<il1
Figure 8.22
2 6 0 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
h
< ?2 — , 9o (8.26)
>h
T h e sh e a r flows q 3 , sh o w n in Fig. 8.22, can be fo u n d by considering e ith e r a
h o rizo n tal sectio n th ro u g h the w ebs o r a vertical cro ss scction th ro u g h th e webs.
T h e tw o e q u a tio n s are
q2 w’ 2 + q3 Wj = q 0 w
and q th 2 + q3 = q0 h
F Jther o f th ese tw o e q u a tio n s, w hen values from Eqs. (8.25) and (8.26) a re su b s ti
tu ted , red u ces to
(8.27)
8.7 S H E A R I N G D E F O R M A T I O N S
i r
e„.
-
/ -----------------------
r if
I 1'
/
v - ,
/ " Ji i f ""
1 !/ . . . . ..L
ib)
w here G = sh e a r m o d u lu s
a xy = sh e arin g stress
q = itxyt = sh e a r flow
I •A = S a xyexy d V (8.29)
1•A = l- l J L d y
Vt tG
<7„g (8.30)
or A= dV
G t2
w here q„ — = slicar flow due to th e u n it ap p lied lo ad a n d q = real sh e a r flows
w hich p ro d u ce the d efo rm atio n . In te g ra tin g Eq. (8.30) gives
o.u QLx L v
A= — (8. 31)
Gt
F o r a stru c lu rc w hich lias N webs afTecting its deflection, F.q. (8.31) becom es
J' *
u n it foique.
ANALYSIS OK TYPICAL MPMWiRS OF SLMIMONOCOQUH STRUCTURE; 2 6 3
Figure 8.27
n _ V C
1 ^ ^ V f|'
~ L 2 A tG ~ 2 A G L
0 .0 2 0 rad
8.9 E L A S T I C A X IS O R S H E A R C E N T E R
Figure 8.28
o f a p p lic a tio n o f th e force. P ractical w ings dev iate slig h tly from c o n d itio n s o f
elasticity because th e skin w rinkles a n d becom es ineffective in resisting co m
pression lo a d s b u t, for p ractical purposes, th e elastic axis m ay be assu m ed to
coincide w ith th e line jo in in g the sh ear cen te rs o f the v a rio u s cro ss sections.
T h e sh e a r c en te r o f a c ro ss section m ay be c a lc u la te d from Eq. (8.33) by
finding the p o sitio n o f the re su ltan t sh ear force w hich yields a zero angle o f tw ist.
T h e sh e a r-c e n te r lo c a tio n d e p en d s on the d istrib u tio n o f th e flange areas a n d th e
thickness o f th e sh e a r w ebs. T h e p ro ced u re can be stu d ie d best by m ean s o f an
illustrative exam ple.
E xam ple 8 . 6 F in d the sh e a r center for th e w ing cro ss sectio n show n in Fig.
8.29. W eb 3 h a s a thick n ess of 0.064 in, a n d the o th e r w eb s have thicknesses
o f 0.040 in. A ssum e G is c o n stan t for all cross sections. T h e cross section is
sy m m etrical a b o u t a h o riz o n ta l axis.
0= £ ^ - ^ = 0
^ 2 A tG
be tak en o u tsid e th e su m m a tio n sign a n d then can celcd :
( 8 .3 4 )
ANALYSIS OF TYPICAL MHMRURS OF SEMIMONOCOQUE STRUCTURES 2 6 5
Kigurc* 8.29
o (8.35)
As As
Web As 1 <l' q' T 2A 2Aq' 9
(t) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
I 8 200 0 0 80 0 - 0 .5 3
2 8 200 -1 0 -2000 80 -8 0 0 -1 0 .5 3
3 to 156 -2 0 -3120 0 0 -2 0 .5 3
4 8 200 -1 0 -2000 0 0 -1 0 .5 3
5 8 200 0 0 0 0 -0 .5 3
6 15.7 392 + 20 7840 239 4780 + 19.47
Total 1348 720 399 3980
F igure 8.30
2 6 6 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
1348<z0 + 720 = 0
q0 = — 0.53 lb/in
T = T.2Aq
3c = 9.42 in
£ Figure 831
T his w arp in g o f th e cro ss scction is the sam e for all c ro ss sectio n s on w hich th e
sh e a r flows are as sh o w n in Fig. 8.27. T h e 1-in len g th a lo n g th e sp an w as selected
a rb itra rily , b u t a n y o th e r length b m ight be used. T h e v alu es o fg „ show n in Fig.
8.326 w ould be div id ed by an assum ed length b; th en th e term s in th e a b o v e
su m m atio n w o u ld be m u ltiplied by h in ste a d o f th e u n it len g th , in o rd e r to yield
the sam e final result.
A t the fixed su p p o rt show n in Fig. 8.26, o b v io u sly th e w a rp in g o f the cro ss
(/■)
Figure 8.32
2 6 8 A IR C R A F T S T R U C T U R E S
16.000
16.000
Vi
IK1 ) Figure 8.33
y 0.05ol x 40 x 1 x 2 0.05j l x 10 x 1
= ^ tG = 0.040 x 4 x 10* + 0.032 x 4 x 106
Figure 834
8.11 R E D U N D A N C Y O F B O X B E A M S
n
Figure X.36
w here the term s a rc in d icated in Fig. 8.35. T h is e q u a tio n can be used for th e
angle o f tw ist o f a m ulticell stru c tu re , if th e su m m a tio n is e v alu a ted a ro u n d a n y
closed p a th a n d th e a re a A is enclosed by this closed p a th . T h u s, for a three-cell
stru ctu re, th e su m m a tio n can be ev alu ated a ro u n d th e e n tire perim eter enclosing
the th ree cells, th e e n tire p erim e te r enclosing a n y o n e cell, o r the a re a en closing
tw o cells. T h is p ro c e d u re is som etim es defined as a line in teg ral, as follow s:
W here the in teg ral re p resen ts an e v alu a tio n a lo n g a closed p a th , retu rn in g t,a th e
sta rtin g p o in t. T h e v alu es o f th e su m m a tio n o r in tegral a re co n sid ered positive in
going clockw ise a ro u n d th e enclosed areas.
T h e follow ing a b b re v ia tio n s are used for the term s in Eq. (8.38):
A.V: . „ As, ( A s\
^1i = X ~ < >22 = < ^ 2 = T (8'3 9 )
i ‘i 2 h \ 1 J 1-2
T h e term <5,, rep resen ts a su m m atio n a ro u n d th e e n tire p erim eter o f cell 1,
i>22 a su m m a tio n a ro u n d th e en tire p erim e ter o f cell 2 , a n d 3 , 2 the value o f th e
in te rio r web. T h e term s S tl a n d S22 b o th in clu d e th e te rm <51 2 for the in te rio r
web. T h e <5 term s d o -not have q u ite th e sa m e significance as th e sim ilar terras
used in p revious stru ctu res, because th e c o n sta n ts a re elim in a ted for sim p licity
a n d the re d u n d a n ts are tak en as sh e a r flows.
By utilizing Eq. 18.39), Eq. (8.38) becom es
T = 2 A l q u + 2 A 1 q ls (8.41)
E q u atio n s (8.40) a n d (8.41) can be solved sim u ltan e o u sly for th e two u n k n o w n s,
q u an d q 2l.
T h e sh e a r flow s resu ltin g from p u re to rsio n m ay be o b ta in e d "111 a sim ilar
m a n n e r fo r a box beam w ith >1 cells. F ro m th e co n d itio n s o f c o n tin u ity o f d e fo r
m a tio n s betw een a d ja c e n t cells,
or
it *i
E q u a tio n s (8.42) a n d (8.44) form a set o f n sim u lta n e o u s lin ea r alg eb raic e q u a
tions w hich c a n be solved for th e n u n k n o w n s, q u , q 2l, ■- ., q„t .
Box b eam s u su ally resist tran sv erse sh ea rin g forces in ad d itio n lo th e to rsio n a l
m o m en ts a lre a d y considered. O ften it is co n v en ie n t to co n sid e r th e tw o effects
sep arately , as a sh e arin g force a p p lied a t th e sh e a r c e n te r a n d as a to rsio n a l
m o m e n t a b o u t th e sh e a r center.
In a m ulticell box su ch a s th a t sh o w n in Fig. 8.37, th e in crem en ts o f flange
loads AP can be calc u lated from the b en d in g stresses a t tw o cro ss sectio n s o r
from th e sh e a r eq u a tio n s as used in C h ap . 5 for a single-cell box. If o n e w eb is cu t
in e ach cell, th e sh e a r flows q' c an be o b ta in e d from th e e q u ilib riu m o f spanw ise
forces o n the strin g ers. T h e stru c tu re sh o w n in Fig. 8.37 is u n stab le fo r to rsio n a l
m o m ents, b u t th e system o f sh e a r flows q' w ill be in e q u ilib riu m w ith ex tern al
sh ear forces a ctin g a t th e sh e a r c e n te r o f th e o p en section.
T h e sh e a r flows q ls , q 2s, an d q3s in th e cu t w ebs c a n be o b ta in e d a n d
su p erim p o sed on th e sh e a r flows q' to give a system o f sh e a r flows w hich h av e a
re s u lta n t eq u a l to th e e x tern al sh earin g force actin g a t th e sh ear c en te r o f th e
closed m ulticell box. A su p e rp o sitio n o f th e c o n d itio n s sh o w n in Figs. 8.37 a n d
8.38 yields the sh e a r flows in a closed m ulticell box w ith n o twist. T h e values o f
q is , q 2s, a n d q is a re fo u n d from th e c o n d itio n th a t the an g les of tw ist 0 U Qj.*, a n d
03 for each cell m u st be zero. A fter q ls , q 2s, a n d d /3s a re o b ta in e d , the eq u a tio n o f
to rsio n al m o m en ts yields th e p o sitio n o f th e sh e a r c e n te r o f th e closed box. T h e n
the ex tern al to rq u e a b o u t the sh e ar c e n te r can be c o m p u te d an d th e sh e a r flows
resulting from this to rq u e calcu lated by th e m eth o d s o f Sec. 8.11.
ANALYSIS OI- TYPICAL MEMBERS OF SEMIMONOCOQUE STRUCTURES 2 7 3
V lA ± = 0
^ lA G t
— q As
i V =0 (8-45)
F o r ccll on e E q. (8.45)'yields
^JO + <hs^3i ~ ^ 2 s ^ 2 J = 0
4 0 0 0 Ib
Figure 8.39
cii As,- 20 10 20
iI : <?I 0.040
+ (qu - 1 0 0 )
0.040
+ <?i.
0.040
f;
10
+ ( 9 1.( — ch s + 1 0 0 ) = 0
0.050
A nd so
q; As,- / 10 10 10
I ti ^ 2 \0 .0 4 0 ) + {‘h s + 2 0 0 \0 .0 8 0 y + 92\ 0 . 0 4 0
q -■ 200
I '-().(>
Ib/in
Figure 8.41
1 2 A q ’ + 2A Lq ls + 2 A 2 q 2s
q 2lf 2 x 1 0 1 0 [ 1 0 y qu 10
PROBLEMS
8.1 Find ihe shear How in each web of the beam shown in Fig, P8.1 and P8.2, nnd plot Ihe
I5 7
1
1U ill
1
—■1U i n—— — - 1 0 i n —— 10 in— -
'
r / Figure P8.I and P8.2
2 7 6 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
distribution of axial load along each stiffening member. Solve for each o r the following loading
conditions:
(«) P , ~ 3000 Ib P2 = P 3 = 0
Ib) P 2 = 6000 lb Pt = P3 = 0
(c) P3 = 6000 lb P 2 = 6000 lb P3 = 6000 lb
8.2 Repeat Prob. 8.1 for the following loading conditions: P x — 2400, P2 = 1200, and = 18001b.
8.3 The pulley bracket shown in Fig. P8.3 and P8.4 is attached lo lycbs along the three sides. Find
the reactions R „ R 2 , and R2 of the webs if P = 1000 lb and 0 =■ 45°.
All stringers
A j “ 0 .2 in ?
8.7 Find the skin reactions on the fuselage ring if P , = 20001b, P2 = 1000 lb, and M — 10,000 in * lb.
8.8 Find the skin reactions on the fuselage ring if P i = 1500 lb, P2 — 5001b, and M — 8000 in - lb.
8.9 Find the skin reactions on the rib shown in Fig. P8.9 and P8.10 if the rib is loaded by the
distributed load of 20 lb/in. Calculate the shear Hows in the rib web and the axial loads in the rib
(hinges at vertical sections 10 and 20 in forward of the spar.
K J0 K rp c a l P r o b . 8.9 if th e rib is lo a d e d by a c o n c e n tr a te d u p w a r d fo rc e o f 0 0 0 lb . a p p lie d ;il a p o in t
20 in fo rw a rd of th e s p a r , in s te a d o f ih e d is tr ib u te d lo a d .
8.11 Find the skin reactions on the rib shown in Fig. P 8 .ll lo P8.16. Analyze vertical cross sections
at 10-in intervals, obtaining the web shear flow's and the axial loads in the rib flanges. Assume the
loads / ', - 40.000 lb and P2 = 0. The spar flange areas are u - b = c = d = 1 in2.
ANALYSIS OF TYPICAL MKMBHRS OF SEMIMONOCOQUE STRUCTURES 2 7 7
20 llv'in
8.15 Repeat Prob. S.II for / ’, - 0 and P 2 — 8000 lb if the spar (lange areas arc n = 3 and
/)=.[■ = ,1 i 1 in2.
8.16 Repeat Prob. 8.11 for /*, ^ 20,(KX) and l‘2 - X000 Ib if the spar flange areas are a = 3 and
b = c = d = 1 in2,
8.17 The structure of Fig. 8.16 has the dimensions in inches h0 = 5, Ay = 15, a = 20, length L = 100.
For a torque T of 40,000 in • lb, findq0. q t, andij„. Find the axial loads in the corner flanges and the
shear flows a t a cross scction 50 in from one end. Check the values by the equilibrium of torsional
moments, including the in-plane components of the flange loads.
8.18 Repeat Prob. R-i£,if /’ j 10 in.
8.19 Find the shear flows and the flange loads for the structure of Fig. 8.1S if only the horizontal load
o f 2000 lb is acting:-""“ ' ~ '
8.20 Find the shear flows and flange loads for the nacelle structure shown in Fig. P8.20 and P8.21.
I0 .U0 0 lh
10.000 lh
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
•30 in-
8.21 Find the shear flows and flange loads for Ihe nacelle structure shown in Fig. P8.20 and P8.21 if a
clockwise couple load o f 200,000 in • lb is acting in addition to the loads shown.
8.22 Find the shear flows in all webs of the structure shown in Fig. 8.20 if a clockwise couple load of
100,000 in • lb is acting in addition lo the loads shown.
8.23 A cantilever wing spar is 10 in deep between centroids of the flange areas. The bending stresses
in the flanges are 30,000 lb/in2, and the shear stresses in the web are 15,000 Ib/in2 at all points. Find
the deflection resulting from shear and bending deformations as well as the percentage of the deflec
tion contributed by the shear at {a) 20 in from the fixed support, (ft) 40 in from the fixed support, and
(r) H)0 in from the fixed support. Use E — 107 and G = 3,000,000 Ib/in2.
8.24 Kind the angle of twist of the wing shown in Fig. 8.26 iT all four flanges have equal areas. Use
G = 4 x 106 ib/in2.
8.25 Find the angle of twist of the wing shown in Fig. 8.26 if all webs have a thickness of 0.040 in.
Use G - 4 x 106 Ib/in2.
8.26 Calculate the location of the shear center, or elastic axis, or the wing in Fig. 8.26.
8.27 Find the shear flows in the webs of the structure shown in Fig. 8.39. The horizontal webs have
gages of 0.064 in and G is constant.
8.28 Find the shear flows in the webs of the structure shown in Fig. 8.39 if all flange areas are 1 in2.
The horizontal webs have gages of 0.064 in, and G is constant.
8.29 Find the shear flows in the webs of the structure shown in Fig. P8.29 to P8.32 if all flanges have
areas of I in2 and all webs have gages of 0.040 in. Assume V =. 3000 Ib, c ~ 8 in, and G is constant for
all webs.
NINE
TH ERM AL STRESSES
9.1 I N T R O D U C T I O N
9 .2 T H E R M A L S T R E S S P R O B L E M : P H I L O S O P H Y
279
2 8 0 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
.1, /:, a
T — T0 is given by
8 b = a { T - T 0) L (9 .1 )
= ^ (9 -2 )
E
Fh + F s = crA + K S b = 0 (9.4)
(9-5)
U p o n s u b s titu tin g Eq. (9.5) in to Eq. (9.3) a n d solving fo r th e stress <r, the follow
ing is o b ta in e d :
= a{T ~ Ta)L
L /b + A /K y
= , « K W T - T 0) (C)
K L + AE
1. E quilibrium o f forces
2. C o m p atib ility o f d efo rm a tio n s
3. S tress-strain and stra in -d isp lac e m e n t relatio n sh ip s
4. B o u n d ary co n d itio n s
Equilibrium Equations
T h e eq uilibrium e q u a tio n s o f a tw o -d im en sio n al so lid sh o w n in Fig. 9.2 are
derived in C h ap . 3:
<h<L±+ r a<*> + R =o (9 .1 1 )
r
Gyp, fl
r
w here the stresses a n d b o d y forces a re show n in Fig. 9.3.
2 8 2 AtRCRAPT STRUCTURES
°\y
+ K,h:
U „ + IT,.,, f ,lx
Figure 9.2
S tr a in - D is p la c e m e n t R e la tio n s h ip s
If \vc co n sid er sm all d efo rm atio n s, the strn in -d isp lacem en t re latio n sh ip s are
or, in p o la r co o rd in a te s,
(9 .1 3 )
ffr.fl , „ <7<?
€ r0 — T*~ <70 , r
r r
T h e r m o c la s tic S tr a in - S tr c s s R e la tio n s h ip s
= g fa x x - 'V y y ) + a T
= - far , - v i r j + a T (9.14)
e = 2Q
e,,. n
Figure 9.3
THERMAL STRESSES 28 3
1 - v2 ( v
= — — ( a „ - ------ - cr„ j + <*T(1 + v)
E V ‘" ~ 1 - v
I — V2 / V
a „ ) + a.T{ 1 + v ) (9.15)
€'xy = G
_ fit?
Crf ~ G
a r0
Compatibility Equations
T he c o m p atib ility e q u a tio n s can be expressed in term s o f stra in s alo n e:
(9.18)
or, in p o la r c o o rd in ates,
^ + r-“ + ^ + ]= _ ( ! + v )
or, for plan e stra in p ro b lem s,
2 8 4 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
Boundary Conditions
F o r a specific th erm a l stress pro b lem , th e ap p lied su rface lo a d s S x a n d Sy m u st be
in eq u ilib riu m w ith th e in d u c ed stresses a t th e b o u n d a rie s o f th e solid:
S x = axx I + <jxym
(9.22)
Sy = (Tyy in + a h
Xy l
S r = a hrrl + a brltm
(9.23)
Soe — I
(9.24/>)
aE
T r dr + C j H— y (9.26)
o r
F o r th e solid p la te sh o w n in Fig. 9.4, r = 0 a t th e c e n te r; hence Eq. (9.26)
becom es und efin ed becau se o f the term C 2/ r 2. T o re n d e r a feasible so lu tio n , C 2
m u st be set to z e ro ; th u s Eq. (9.26) becom es
aE
o ,r = - - T r dr + (9.27)
F ro m b o u n d a ry c o n d itio n s a„ — 0 a t r = R 0 . H e n ce th e c o n sta n t o f in te
g ratio n is
Ro
T r dr
a n d a„ becom es
aE aE 'Ro
T r dr + —2 T r dr
R■2o J
a£ fr _ , aE Ro
and f7„„ = — 7. E T f T r dr (9.28)
H ' r" f
r+5IJ
aE ( r - R f Ro
Or, - T r dr - T r dr
r2 \ R 2 - R f J Ri
Ro
a E f r2 + R f
Cflfl T r dr + T r dr - T r 2 (9.29)
R o -R fJ
crr0 = 0
E q u atio n s (9.26) a n d (9.27) are cases o f g en eralized p lan e stress o r plane stra in
■ problem s (b o d y forces a re zero) and th u s a p p ly equally to u n re stra in e d open -en d
cylindrical shells.
F igure 9.4
2 8 6 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
d 2<t> d 2® 3 2d>
0xx~ W ~ ~ te fy (9'30)
then (he eq u ilib riu m e q u a tio n s, Eqs. (9.9) an d (9 .10 ), a re satisfied w ith the b o d y
forces set eq u al to zero. If <I> has to d escribe th e tru e stress field, it m u st satisfy
not only eq u ilib riu m b u t also c o m p atib ility and b o u n d a ry cond itio n s. T hus,
su b stitu tin g Eq. (9.30) in to £ q . (9.20) for th e p lan e stress p ro b lem yields
c?40 d4<t> ( 8 2T d 2T ,
o ? + 2S ? s ? + y + “EU ? + s7 ) = 0 <931)
In p o la r c o o rd in a te s, Eq. (9.31) becom es
_ 11 I ilYil 11 J
i Pr1 /• Pr r 2 P02J \P r2 r r> r
\u r
1^5 1 5 2<J)
r dr + r 2 DO1
tPtl)
(9.33)
Or0 d r \r dO j
F o r a given specific th erm a l stress p ro b lem , Eq. (9.31) o r (9.32) can be solved
by using tech n iq u es o f so lv in g differential eq u a tio n s.
(7 v t, (7 fr = a c tu a l therm al stresses
E 'jtT
------- = local uniform pressure c o u n te rb a la n c in g frcc-cxpansion
l — i' , .
stra in
Fa T
(935)
<r,, = d xy
a ..vi. ,t + a xy. y + X —0
(9.36)
IV. + <rA1. v. -I- V= 0
_ Ea dT
A — — . _
(9.37)
Y _ Ea d T
1 — v dy
.Sl = a h„ I + &x). m
(9.38)
Sy = (fyy in + a xy I
E xT
E xT
Goo = aoo - -j— - (9.40)
&r0 — a r0
(9.41)
aoo.o . - . 2&re . p. *
~ ^ T + aro., + ~ y + 0 = 0
w here
_ Ear d r
(9.42)
© - _ EaT dT
I - v dO
Sr = o*„l +
(9.43)
S e = o h in + a h I
and
E olT
1“ v (9.44)
- EaT
SB = - - ------ m
1— v
By ex am in in g Eqs. (9.36). (9.38), (9.41), a n d (9.43), it is a p p a re n t th a t for an y
given te m p e ra tu re d is trib u tio n , w ith th e u se o f Eqs. (9.37), (9.39), (9.42), and,(9.44)
the th erm al stress p ro b lem can be c o n v e rte d to an e q u iv alen t iso th erm al stress
pro b lem w ith c o n v en tio n a l loads. T h u s, so lu tio n s o f th erm a l stress p ro b lem s
becom e id entical to th o se o f th e iso th erm a l ones. As a n illu stra tio n , co n sid er the
u n re stra in e d beam o f Fig. 9.5 to be h ea te d to a u n ifo rm te m p e ratu re T0 . T h e
surlace tra c tio n s at th e en d s o f the beam , if we co n sid er ax ial d irection only, arc
a.ETtt. as show n.
T h ese surface tra c tio n s will in d u cc a c o n sta n t e q u iv a len t axial stress d xx =
<xET0 th ro u g h o u t th e beam . H ence from Eq. (9.35) for the o n e-d im en sio n al p ro b
lem, the th e rm a l stress is
y = ai:r„ F «AT„ = 5j
F ig u r e 9J5
T-T°(j)'
T h e surface tra c tio n s a t th e en d s will n o w ta k e th e fo rm
<
“>
= a ET0 {yj0)3, as
show n in Fig. 9.6.
T h ese surface tra c tio n s p ro d u ce e q u iv a le n t en d b e n d in g m o m e n ts:
c bEaTn 3E aT 0 1
M = (b)
My 3E aT 0
(c)
° xx = T = 5c
< t„ = 5 XX — a E T = a E T 0 l i
5 c
9.5 T H E R M A L S T R E S S E S IN U N R E S T R A I N E D B E A M S W I T H
T E M P E R A T U R E V A R IA T IO N T H R O U G H T H E D E P T H O N L Y
and
VxJy)
Figure 9.6
2 9 0 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
F igure 9.7
By assu m in g b o d y forces are zero, it can be seen from Eqs. (9.9) a n d (9.10)
th at eq u ilib riu m is id entically satisfied. The c o m p a tib ility e q u a tio n [E q . (9.20)]
becom es
£
I ((rxx + « £ T ) = 0 (9-45)
dy
<?xx = — a E T + A t f + A 2 (9.46)
T he c o n sta n ts o f in te g ra tio n A t an d A 2 m ay b e ch o sen su ch th at for any te m p e r
a tu re g ra d ie n t T(v), the re su lta n t force a n d m o m e n t in d u ccd by a xx are zero o v er
the e n d s 'o f th e beam :
a xx dA — (rxxy d A = 0 (9.47)
U tilizing E q. (9.46) in Eq. (9.47) an d solving for (he c o n sta n ts yield the follow ing
expression for the th e rm a l stress in th e beam :
aE
= - <*ET + T y dy (9.48)
2c
$t Mr
(Txx = — aET +~7 + ~ 7~ y (9.49)
A ]
w here
S T = xE T dA M- T y dA (9.50)
w here
S T = aE T dA M !-J- = a E T z dA M \ = aE [ T y dA (9.52)
9.6 T H E R M A L S T R E S S E S IN B U I L T - U P S T R U C T U R E S
F ig u re 9.8
2 9 2 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
te m p eratu re. A lso assu m e th a t all m em bers a re o f th e sam e m aterial a n d each has
a cross-sectional a re a A . T h e eq u iv alen t th e rm a l lo a d c au sed by the te m p e ra tu re
chan g e in m em b e r 1 is A E a T and is show n in Fig. 9.8. U sing the e q u atio n s o f
s ta tic eq u ilib riu m in co n ju n c tio n w ith th e jo in t m eth o d yields th e forces in m em
bers 1 a n d 2 :
F2 = 0 F1 = AEaT
H en ce from F.q. (9.35) for the o n e-d im en sio n al p ro b le m , the th erm al stresses
Fi AEaT
irt = — - a E T , = — — aET = 0
A A
<t2 ^ -« £ T 2= ^- aE(0) = 0
A A
F xi 0 sym m etric ft = 0
F\ AE 0 1 5 -1 = 0
FI L 0
(fl)
0 0
-F i- 0 - 1 0 1
Elem ent 2:
Si H
FX
2 0.5 sym m etric
f>
2 AE 0.5 0.5
O O
L - 0 .5 -0.5 0.5
II II
SsfO
I I n i'
Figure 9.9
TH1-UMAI. STO SSES 2 9 3
Element 3:
F\ 0.5 sy m m etric [<5-2 I
F\ AE - 0 .5 0.5 <5$ (c)
FI L - 0 .5 0.5 0.5 <55 = 0
F i_ 0.5 -0 .5 - 0 .5 0.5 «5J = 0
T h e o verall red need m atrix can be o b ta in e d easily, as w as d o n e in C h a p . 6,
a n d is given by
0
r\ "1 AJ EA ' r 1 A
1.0 0 V
r\ ~l sx
W
AEaT L 0
A
2.0
.1
K> £
81 AE 0 0.5 AEaT
t„.
1
T h e eq u iv alen t th e rm a l lo ad s o n e a c h elem en t m a y b e o b ta in e d from E q s. (a)
to (c):
Elem ent I :
AEaT
F>[ = F>2
AEaT
or f i = m f + ( P ;) 2] (tension)
Element
AEaT
FI = - Fi =
4
A EaT
P2 = - F $ =
4
AEaT
or (tension)
2 j2
Element 3:
AEaT
/■2 = — /• i =
4
A EaT
F \= - F \ = :
4
A E zT
or F3 = - (tension)
2J2
2 9 4 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
Fi AEaT EaT
<7t = ~A ~~ 1= 2 a . ~~ a E T = —
F2 _ EaAT _ EaT
— a E T = — 7=— 7=r— — 0 = ■
'-JiA 2^/2 ^JlA ~ 4
ff3 = (r2
2 ; = 1 A iE j 2 AE l^ A E X )
P erform ing the d ifferen tiatio n w ith respect to R j a n d se ttin g the result equal to
zero yield
R 1 =
E a _A T = F_j
_
F
^ 1 - P-*3 r
2 y /2
. I /:'o r
Figure 9.11)
1
Bn
THERMAL STRESSES 295
or
EaAT ^ ^ EaT
„ = — - / - a T = —
EaAT EaT
ff Z ~ f f 3 ~ 2 ^ 2 ^ 2 A ~ ° - 4
w hich a rc the sam e results o b tain ed by using the stiffness m atrix technique. As
m ay be seen from th e tw o preceding p ro b lem s, th e a d v a n ta g e o f the stiffness
m atrix m eth o d is th a t it yields n o t o n ly th e in tern a l e q u iv a len t th erm al lo ad s b u t
also the a ctu a l th e rm a l deflections.
R igid-fram e stru c tu re s u n d er the a c tio n o f th erm a l lo a d s are analyzed in the
sam e m a n n e r as tru ss stru ctu res. F irst the e q u iv ale n t th e rm a l loads arc ca lc u
lated, an d then a n y con v en ien t tech n iq u e em p lo y ed in co n v en tio n ally load ed
stru ctu res can be used.
PROBLEM S
9.1 F in d I he ra d ia l d is p la c e m e n t o f a ih in . c ir c u la r , s o lid p la te w h ic h is s u b je c te d to a te m p e r a tu r e
d is tr ib u tio n T — T{r).
9.2 F in d th e r a d ia l d is p la c e m e n t o f a c irc u la r c y lin d e r w h o se e n d s a r e h e ld b etw e en tw o rig id walls.-
A ssu m e a te m p e r a tu r e d is tr ib u tio n 7 ’ — 7 (r).
9 .3 F in d th e th e rm a l s tre s s e s in s trip s I a n d 2 o f th e c o m p o s ite b e a m s h o w n in F ig. P9.3. A ss u m e
u n ifo rm te m p e r a tu r e s 7 ’, a n d 7 \ fo r s trip s I a n d 2, re sp e c tiv e ly . A lso a s s u m e th a t n o slip p a g e ta k e s
p la ce a t th e b o n d line.
F ig u re P 9 .3
S k in
T ~
h S lti
_K H■
Figure P9.4
2 9 6 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
9.5 The inner and o u ter surface temperatures of a circular cylindrical shell (inner radius = R, and
outer radius = R„) are kept constant at T, and T„, respectively. T he end surfaces are perfectly insula
ted. Find the steady-state tem perature distribution in the cylinder, and plot the results. Assume the
datum tem perature to be 7^.
Hint: See G atew ood, Jr., Aero. Sri., vol. 21, no. 9, 1954, pp. 645-646.
d2T 1 dT
l? +-r i; = 0
9.6 Refer lo Prob. 9.5. F ind the stresses in the cylinder. Assume unrestrained conditions. Plot the
results.
9.7 F o r the riveted structure shown in Fig. P9.7, find the loads on each rivet. The critical rivet load
0
©
and deflection are 1200 lb and 0.006 in, respectively. Assume steady-state tem perature distribution.
The following data are given:
E, = E 2 = 101 lb/in2
2 A t = A 2 = 2.0 in2
a , = a2 — 1 0 ~ 7 in/(i'n • °F)
T0 = 80°F
H in t: See G atew ood, Jr.. Afro. Set., vol. 21, no. 9, 1954, pp. 645-646.
9.8 The general equation which describes the general state of stress in a one-dimensional thermally
loaded beam is
<jxx = * E l- T ( y ) + A y + B ]
where A and B are arbitrary constants which depend on the end conditions of the beam. FjrTd the
stress in an unrestrained beam whose cross section is shown in Fig. P9.8 and subjected to a temper
ature distribution given by T = T0 ye~*’.
THERMAL STRESSES 2 9 7
9.9 In Prob. 9.8, consider a beam whose cross scction is shown in Fig. P9.9. The skin is m ade out of
aluminum and is at a constant tem perature 7j, while the web and (lange are made out of different
material and at a constant temperature Tw, Find the stresses in the skin, web, and flange.
(«) Assume that ihe beam is completely unrestrained.
(b) Assume that the beam is restrained in axial compression.
/ w—f.
w - web area
I ~1
A , = flange area Figure P9.9
9.10 The tem perature of a beam of rectangular cross section, as show n in Fig. P9.I0, is T =
Ta e'-x +fr‘. Using the Airy stress function iji = {•(x)li(y), find the stress distribution throughout the
beam. Assume the beam is unrestrained.
9.1! Design the truss structure shown in Fig. P 9 .ll. Assume 2024-T42 aluminum-alloy tubing con
struction is used.
9.12 Find Ihe thermal stresses and dellections for each of the structures shown in Fig. P9.12.
T, = 200 T
Figure P9.12
9.1.1 Find Ihe displacements for the structure shown in Fig. P9.13. Assume the beam is subjected
to a tem perature dislribulion given by T = 400y,’h, as shown. Assume E = 107 lb/in2 and a = 10~7
iri/(in • "I") for both rod and beam.
‘/ / ' / /
h i
ll12
Figure P9.I3
CHA PTER
TEN
DESIGN OF MEMBERS IN TENSION,
BEN D IN G , OR TORSION
10.1 T E N S I O N M EM BERS
299
3 0 0 AIRCRAFT S T R U C T U R E S
‘'I <'.1 r 4
Figure 10.1
n :i
Figure 103
3 0 2 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
220,000 , _
MS = - 1 = 0.09
201,000
It is also necessary to d eterm in e a yield m arg in o f safety. F o r this m aterial,
the yield stress is 165,000 lb /in 2. T h e applied o r lim it b ending m o m en t is
§ x 25,000 = 16,670 in • lb an d so
^ = ^ S i = i3 4 ’oooib/in2
o r the m arg in o f safety for yielding is
= 1 = 0 .2 3
134,000 ^
10.3 C O N S T A N T B E N D I N G STRESS
C
,1/
c
“ i h
y
i
Figurt* 10.4
c
M = a0 y dA ( 10. 1)
M = 2Q o0 ( 10.2 )
w h e re
(10.3)
F o r the sym m etrical area, the n eu tral axis c o rre sp o n d s w ith th e axis of sy m m etry ,
as in the case o f clastic bending. F o r an u n sy m m etrical a re a , th e n eu tral ax is is
not a t the cc n tro id , b u t is located so th a t the c ro ss-scctio n al area a b o v e th e
neutral axis is e q u a l to the area below it, sin ce the to ta l ten sio n force m u st e q u a l
the lota! co m p ressio n force.
F o r a re c ta n g u la r beam o ‘>' w idth b a n d d e p th h, A = b h 2/&. S u b stitu tin g in
F.q. (10.2) yields
0.2
1 • 0.12 a0
0.6
T
0.4
f = 0.3
? ~ r ' i ; 0.12u„
,1/ = 0.04So0
f*----0.6---- ►
]
an
Figure 10.6
DESIGN OF MEMBERS IN TENSION, BENDING, OR TORSION 3 0 5
M = 2Q<r0 + H i i l (10.5)
c
Ob = <?m + K<7q ( 1 0 .7 )
20
w here K — —1 (10.8)
l/c
Som e values o f K for v ario u s cross sections a re sh o w n in F ig. 10.7.
T h e valu e o f a 0 sh o u ld be d eterm in ed in su ch a w ay th a t the b ending
m om ent resisted by th e assum ed tra p ez o id al stress d is trib u tio n is equal to th e
bending m o m e n t resisted by th e actu a l stresses. T h erefo re, th e c o rrect value o f cr0
w ould d ep en d so m e w h a t on th e cro ss-sectio n al a re a . If th e value o f cr0 w ere
calculated for each a re a , there w ould be n o a d v a n ta g e in a ssu m in g a trap ezo id al
stress d is trib u tio n , since it w ould be n ecessary to c a lc u la te the true resisting
m o m en t o f the b ea m in o rd e r to calc u late a 0 . C o zzo n e h a s show n th a t it is
sufficiently a c c u ra te to calc u latc tr0 for a re c ta n g u la r cross sectio n a n d to use this
value for all cro ss sections.
E xam ple 10.2 A b eam w ith the cro ss scctio n sh o w n in Fig. 10.8 is m ad e of
a lu m in u m -a llo y forging. T h e tru e sh a p e o f th e fo rging is sh o w n by the d o tte d
lines, b u t th e tra p e z o id s show n by th e so lid lines a re assum ed. C alculate the
Section K Scelinn K
0 0 J 5 to 0.7
I ©
1\ 0.5 1.0
i
0 i.i 0.5
E I I j
Figure 10.7
3 0 6 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
o .:o
u ltim ate b end in g stre n g th a b o u t a h o riz o n tal axis if <x„, = 65,000, <r0 =
60,000, an d the yield stress crly = 50,000 lb /in 2.
r 8 x 0.12 x l 3 4 x 0.20 x l 3
/ ----------------------- + ---------- ---------- = 0 .3 4 7 in4
12 ' 3
„ 20 , 0.56 , „,
~ I fc ~ 0.347 “ ~ ' 1
M = = 101,600 = 35,300 in • lb
c i .0 y
Figure 10.9
10.5 C U R V E D BEAM S
L — fc3(R + y)
3 0 8 MRCRAl-T STRUCTURE
Figure 10.10
r 3 _ T~k i + k 2 y
a L k 2(R + y)
a = a+ (10.9)
R + y
T his stress d is trib u tio n is p ictu red in Fig. 10.10c.
If a re s u lta n t ten sio n force P acts at th e c e n tro id o f th e a re a , it m ust equal th e
sum of the in tern al forces, th a t is, J a dA. F ro m E q. (10.9) w e have
dA
P = dA = uA + b
I R + y
(10.10)
y dA
M = v dA y d A {■ h
R + y
’ y dA
JR + y ~
DESIGN OF MKMRERS IN TENSION, BENDING, O R TORSrON 3 0 9
dA
M = b A ~ bR ( 10. 11)
R + y
F ig u re j 0.11
3 1 0 a ir c r a f t s t r u c t u r e s -f
1
(/')
10.6 T O R S I O N O F C IR C U L A R S H A F T S
Figure 10.13
nr.SIGN OF MFMBFRS IN TENSION, FSFNDING, OR TORSION 311
x ,= K r (10.12)
T= r , r dA = K \ r 2 dA (10.13)
Ts = y (10.14)
G= — (10.15)
7
A nd C is related to E for an iso tro p ic m ateria! o n ly by the follow ing e q u a tio n :
C = r-4 - (10.16)
2(1 + ti)
T he shaft o f rad iu s r0 sh o w n in Fig. 10.13 tw ists th ro u g h a n an g le <ji in len g th
L. A p o in t o n the circum ference of the u p p e r c ro ss sectio n m o v es a distance q>rQ
, d u rin g the d efo rm atio n . T h is p o in t is also d isp la c e d a d ista n c e yL, as sho w n :
<l”'u = yL
T h e angle o f tw ist <f>m a y b e expressed in o th e r fo rm s b y s u b s titu tin g values fro m
Eqs. (10.15) a n d (10.14):
4 ,= = = {10.17)
v r0 G r0 JG
10.7 T O R S I O N O F A N O N C IR C U L A R S H A F T
Figure 10.14
h i
SIZE
(</) ib)
Figure 10.16
Fig. 10.156. T h e cubical elem en ts a t the co rn ers rem a in c u b ica l, a s ind icated in
Fig. 10.15a, b u t elem ents n e a r th e cen ters o f th e sides h a v e ra th e r larg e shearin g
deform ations. T h e cross sectio n s th erefore d o n o t rem ain p lan e, b u t w arp as
show n.
O n e type o f m em b er w hich is used freq u en tly o n flight vehicle stru c tu re s h as
a n arro w , rectan g u lar cro ss section. W hile su ch cro ss sectio n s a re inefficient for
to rsio n m em bers, often th e y m u st resist som e to rsio n a l stresses. F o r the cross
section show n in Fig. 10.16 o f len g th 6 an d w id th f, the s h e a r stresses m u st be
parallel to th e b o u n d a ry . If th e length h is large co m p a red to th e th ick n ess t, the
end effects a re sm all, a n d th e sh e a r stresses m ay be assu m ed to b e d istrib u te d as
show n in Fig. 10.166 fo r th e e n tire length 6. It c a n be sh o w n th a t th e sh e a r stress
has th e follow ing value:
3J
2 ( 10. 18)
bt
E q u a tio n (10.18) is a c c u ra te when the w id th 6 is larg e c o m p a re d to the
thickness 1. F o r re c ta n g u la r cro ss sections in w hich the d im en sio n s are o f the
sam e o rd er, the m ax im u m stress, w hich o ccu rs a t th e m id d le o f th e lon g est side, is
fo u n d by
T
(10.19)
abt
V alues o f a are given in T a b le 10.1. T hese values h av e been calc u la ted by th e o r
etical m eth o d s w hich a re n o t w ithin the scope o f th e p re se n t d iscu ssio n . F o r large
ra tio s o f b/t, the value o f a is 0.333, w hich c o rre sp o n d s to E q. (10.18). F o r sm aller
values of b/t, th e effects o f th e en d s are m o re n o ticeab le, a n d th e v alu es o f a are
sm aller than 0.333.
T h e angle of tw ist o f a re c ta n g u la r shaft o f len g th L can be o b ta in e d from
TL
P bt3G
w here (jj is in rad ian s a n d /f is a c o n sta n t w hich is given in T a b le 10.1.
a 0.208 0.231 0.23y 0.246 0.25S 0.267 0.282 0.299 0.307 0.313 0.333
f! 0.141 0.196 0.214 0.229 0.249 0.263 0.281 0.299 0.307 0.313 0.333
314 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
_7>_ T
(10.24)
2K Rh
TL
<*= — = ■ (10.25)
V JG 2 n R 3tG
3TL
$ = (10.27)
2 n R ti G
T h e ra tio o f sh e a rin g stresses for th e tw o m em b ers is o b ta in e d by d ividing
Eq. (10.26) by Eq. (10.24). T h e values o f th e stress a n d an g le for th e closed
tube a re d esig n ate d t s0 a n d </>„, respectively:
3R
60
t
</>!
10.8 E N D R E S T R A I N T O F T O R S I O N M E M B E R S
In Sec. 10.7 we a ssu m e th a t the end cro ss sectio n s o f th e to rsio n m em bers a re free
to w arp from th e ir o rig in al plane a n d th a t th ere a re n o stresses n o rm a l to th e
cross sections. I t h as been p o in ted o u t th a t m a n y a irc ra ft stru c tu ra l m em b ers
m ust be c o n stru c te d w ith thin w ebs a n d th a t such m em b ers are v ery inefficient in
resisting to rsio n a l lo ad s unless they form a closed b o x . In so m e cases, it is
necessary to use o p en sectio n s w ith thin w eb s; a n d in m o s t o f these cases, the
ends sh o u ld b e re stra in e d to p ro v id e a d d itio n a l to rsio n a l rigidity a n d stren g th .
T h e 1 beam sh o w n in Fig. 10.20 resists p a rt o f th e to rsio n by m ean s o f th e
sh ear stresses d istrib u te d fo r th e in d iv id u al rectangles, a s sh o w n in Fig. 10.16.
T he re m a in d e r o f the to rsio n is resisted b y h o riz o n ta l b en d in g o f th e beam
flanges, as show n in Fig. 10.20b. T h e p ro p o rtio n o f th e to rsio n w hich is resisted
by each o f the tw o w ays d ep en d s on th e d im en sio n s o f th e cross section a n d the
len g th o f th e m em ber. T h is p ro p o rtio n also varies a lo n g th e m em ber, as m o re of
the to rsio n is resisted by flange b ending n e a r th e fixed end th a n n e ar th e free end.
F o r m em b ers in w hich th e w ebs a re th in a n d th e le n g th is n o t g reat, ail the
torsion m ay be assu m ed to be resisted by flange b en d in g . In the case o f long
m em bers w ith th ick w ebs, all the to rsio n m ay b e assu m e d to be resisted b y th e
to rsio n al resistan ce o f th e re cta n g u la r elem ents. In som e cases, how ever, it m ay
be necessary to c alc u la te th e p ro p o rtio n of th e to rsio n resisted by each m eth o d .
A m em b er w hich is n o t restrain ed a t th e en d s tw ists as show n in Fig. 10.21.
T h e angle o f tw ist varies uniform ly alo n g th e len g th a n d m ay be co m p u ted from
Eq. (10.21). F o r a m e m b e r resisting to rsio n by m ean s o f flange bending, as sh o w n
in Fig. 10.20/), th e flange b en d in g stresses v ary from z e ro a t th e free en d to
m axim um values a t th e fixed end. T h e an g le o f tw ist an d the a m o u n t o f cross
section w a rp in g v ary a lo n g th e span. F o r th e J-b eam cross section, T im oSfienko
and G e re 9 give the follow ing eq u atio n s for th e m ax im u m flange b en d in g m o m e n t
niSK iN OF MFMBHRS IN TENSION, BENDING, Olt TORSION 3 1 7
Figure 10.21
( 1 0 .2 9 )
0 = -tH l — a ta n h — ) (10.31)
KG «/
2ly E (10.32)
KG
T h e term I f is th e m o m e n t o f in ertia o f o n e flange o f th e b ea m a b o u t a vertical
axis, K is defined b y Eq. (10.22), a n d h is th e beam d e p th betw een cen te rs o f
flanges. T h e analysis for th e / beam sh o w n in F ig. 10.20 also applies for a b e a m
of leng th 2 L w hich has a to rq u e o f 2 T ap p lie d a t th e c e n te r a n d w hich resists h a lf
Figure 10.22
3 1 8 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
It has been assum ed th a t th e stresses arc below th e elastic lim it in the previous
analysis of to rsio n a l stresses. In m any design a p p lic a tio n s, the ultim ate to rsio n al
stren g th is desired. W hile th ere is n o t m uch p u b lish ed in fo rm atio n con cern in g
stress-strain curves for specim ens in pure sh ear, these cu rv es will have the sam e
general sh a p e as th e ten sio n stress-strain curvcs a n d w ill h av e o rd in ate s a p p ro x i
m ately 0.6 o f th o se fo r th e tension curves. T h u s the to rsio n a l stresses in a ro u n d
b a r a re d is trib u te d as sh o w n in Fig. 10.23 w hen th e stresses exceed th e elastic
lim it.
As in th e plastic b en d in g o f beam s, it is c o n v en ie n t to w o rk w ith a fictitious
stress in stead o f the ex act stress d istrib u tio n s. T h is stress is d esignated as the
to rsio n al m o d u lu s o f ru p tu re i r , w hich is defined by
Tr
(10.33)
w here T is the u ltim a te to rsio n a l stre n g th o f the m em b er. F o r steel tubes, the
value o f x T d ep en d s o n the p ro p o rtio n s o f th e cro ss scction. T h e values of th e
ratio T r /r r ,„ a re sh o w n in Fig. 10.24 for v a rio u s values o f the ratio o f outsid e
d ia m e te r to wall thickness D /t. T hese curves a re ta k e n from M IL -H D B K -5 .
E q u a tio n (10.33) ap p lies to o n ly c irc u la r o r h o llo w circ u la r cross se'ctions,
/
/
/
Figure 10.23
i>i;sk;n or mhmiii-rs in' thnsion, hi-nding, or torsion 319
an d Fig. 10.24 supp lies in fo rm atio n for allo w ab le stresses o n all su ch cross sec
tions for v ario u s a irc ra ft steels. T h e plastic to rsio n a l stress d istrib u tio n in n o n
circu lar sections u su ally c a n n o t !>c o b ta in e d by a n y sim ple analysis. O ften it m ay
bo necessary to m a k e sta tic tests on to rsio n m em b ers o f n o n c irc u la r cross sec
tions to d eterm in e the allow able to rsio n al m o m en ts to use for design.
MS = — — 1 = 1 ^ - 1 = 0 .0 0 7
t, 59,600
n il Figure 10.24
3 2 0 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
T ab le 10.2
tot D /
Tube, in 100 in t y *7- MS
n . 21 T 8000
R eq u ired —= — = — = ■
r y xT 60,000
or
MS = — —1= - 1 = 0.04
x, 51,000
Rb + R t — 1 (10.34)
3 2 2 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
M S= i d T r ‘ (ia35)
F o r ro u n d tu b e s in co m b in ed b en d in g a n d to rsio n , th e stresses d o n o t a d d
algebraically. F o r stresses below th e elastic lim it, the m ax im u m stress at an y
p o in t m ay be o b ta in e d readily by using M o h r’s circle. T h e m ax im u m ten sio n a n d
sh earin g stresses in th e tube sh o w n in Fig. 10.26a will o c cu r a t th e su p p o rt an d
on the u p p e r surface, as show n. T h e ten sio n stress in th e d ire c tio n o f th e axis o f
the tu b e <jb is fo u n d from th e b en d in g m o m e n t M as follow s:
= -p (10.36)
.2 , / < V 2
S u b stitu tin g values <jb a n d xs from Eqs. (10.36) an d (10.37) in to Eq. (10.38) yields
Figure 10.26
DESIGN OF MF.MBF.RS IN TENSION, BENDING, OR TORSION 323
M S = —j= = L = = - 1 (10.41)
jR l + Rl
W here eith er the b en d in g m o m en t o r th e to rsio n a l m o m e n t is zero, Eqs. (10.40)
an d (10.41) yield values w hich w ere prev io u sly o b ta in e d fo r b en d in g o r to rsio n
onlv.
3 2 4 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
R xi + * $ = 1 (10.42)
w here th e ex p o n en ts x a n d v usu ally m u st be fo u n d experim en tally by p lo ttin g
test results, as sh o w n in Fig. 10.27, a n d by w ritin g a n e q u a tio n for a curve p assing
th ro u g h the points.
My 30.000 11fnnniu;_2
= 116,000 lb /in
1 0.25S6
ah 116,000
Ri aB 211,000 ° ' 55°
P 50,000
ff' = I = ^ ==88’0 0 0 ,b /m
0488
1 ff,u 180,000
MS = - 1 = - 0 .0 3 5
Rh + R t
MS = - , •’ - 1 = - 0 .0 7
T h e tu b e is u nsatisfactory.
Since th e stre ss -ra tio tech n iq u e w as d ev elo p e d b y S h an ley a n d R y d er35 y ears ago,
m an y th eo ries o f failure in stru c tu ra l desig n h a v e been p resented. T h e th re e m o s t
co m m o n ly u sed a re the m ax im u m stress th e o ry , m ax im u m sh ear th eo ry , a n d
m ax im u m d is to rtio n energy th e o ry .37
In th e m ax im u m stress theory, failu re is sa id to o c cu r in a stru c tu ra l m e m b e r
u n d er th e a c tio n o f com bined stresses w h en o n e o f th e p rin cip al stresses reach es
the failu re v a lu e (yield stress, u ltim a te stress, etc.) in sim ple tension cr0 . In a
tw o -d im en sio n al s ta te o f stress, failu re is d efin ed a s follow s:
or
a
-'• = + 1 (cr, > <t2)
(10.43)
— = ± 1 (cr2 > O’!
00 0i
Tj - 2 -
t2 = y0 0 = h (10.44)
2
00 0i
±
2 2
<Xi <72 ~ ± 0 0
a 2 = + ffo
f t = ± 0 -o
C’HAPTI-R
ELEVEN
BUCKLING DESIG N OF
STRUCTURAL MEMBERS
11.1 B E A M - D E F L E C T I O N E Q U A T IO N S
328
BUCKLING DESIGN O f STRUCTURAL MEMBERS 329
Figure II. 1
( 1 1 .3 )
0 = sin 0 = ta n 0 (1 1 .4 )
( 1 1 .5 )
330 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
d 2y M
dx2 ~ E I (1L6)
All c o n v en tio n al m e th o d s o f o b ta in in g b eam deflections a re based o n E q. (11.6).
It sh o u ld be n o te d th a t th e deflections y a re m easu red p o sitiv e u p w ard , so th a t a
positive b e n d in g m o m e n t M p ro d u c e s a p o sitiv e c u rv a tu re d 2y /d x 2. E q u a tio n
(11.6) often is derived from the a ssu m p tio n th a t y is p o sitiv e d o w n w ard , a n d a
m inus sign is in tro d u c e d becau se a positive b e n d in g m o m en t w o u ld th e n p ro d u c e
a negative cu rv atu re .
11.2 L O N G COLUM NS
|
BUCKLING DESIGN O F STRUCTURAL MEMBERS 331
, — L = 7i, 2n. 3 n , . . . , n n
' El
(H .1 0 )
P cr = ^ r - (u.ii)
i 1.3 E C C E N T R I C A L L Y L O A D E D C O L U M N S
n
x
L Figure 11.4
(11.13)
(11.14)
6 Figure 115
(1 1 .1 5 ).
(11.16)
d 1-
0 Fig u re 11.6
3 3 4 A IR C R A F T ST R U C T U R E S
11.5 C O L U M N END F IX IT Y
^ + ^ = 0 (11.17)
Jx* + k d x 1 °
V = 0 d zy /d x 2 = 0 at x — 0
y = 0 d 2y /d x 2 = 0 a t .x = L
,V(0) = 0
dy
dx(0)
= 0
dy
y(I-) = 0 0
dx(L ) :
J’<0) = 0 y[L) = 0
dy d 2y
= 0 = 0
dx( 0) dP V L)
C 2 + C4 — 0
k C i -f- C 3 = 0
0 1 0
k 0 1 0
sin k L cos k L L = 0
k 2 sin k L k 2 cos k L 0 0
T h e critical buck lin g load o ccu rs at the sm allest v alu e o f k L w hich satisfies the
tran scen d en tal e q u a tio n abo v e. T h is value c a n b e sh o w n lo b e eq u al to n.
H ence the critical bu ck lin g lo a d is
k 2E c k 2E
for lo ng co lu m n s o n ly ( 11. 20 )
= (Em 1 = (L/t>f
-------------- A-------------- -
i /
1
! Figure 11. U
gro(E/P)2
(11.23)
4 n 2E
T h e term ac0 is called the column yield stress. It has little physical significance,
since very sh o rt co lu m n s (L/p < 12) fail by block co m p ressio n ra th e r th a n
co lu m n actio n , an d Eq. (1 1.23) is n o t ap p licab le in this ran g e. T he value o f tr c0 is
d eterm in ed so th a t Eq. (11.23) will fit sh o rl-co lu m n test d a ta for values o f L /p
ab o v e the block co m p ressio n range.
T h e general sccond-dcgrce p a ra b o la e q u a tio n is sh o w n in Fig. 11.12 w ith the
co rre sp o n d in g E uler eq u atio n . T he value o f <tcQ rep resen ts the in tercep t o f this
340 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
geou-'py
fdi 4 7r2£
]
n2E
(L'lp)2
v<un
0
s/2ir-J~E~
<>ca Figure 11.12
(11.24)
(11.25)
E jp
B = — 7= = = (11.26)
K = — (11.27)
c,cO
R. = - p (H .2 8 )
E q u atio n s (11.23) to (1 1.25) will have the follow ing form s, respectively:
R„ = 1.0 - 0 .2 5 S 2 (11.29)
R „ = 1.0 - 0 .3 0 2 7 B1 5 (11.30)
Ra = 1 .0 — 0.385B (11.31)
T hese eq u a tio n s arc p lo tte d in Fig. 11,14. T h e d im cn sio n less form of expressing
colum n curves has the a d v a n ta g e of sh o w in g co lu m n cu rv es for all m aterials o n a
Figure 11.14
342 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
w here d and e a re dim en sio n less functions of the stress cr a n d the stra in e and the
m o d u lu s o f elasticity E:
€ = — (11.33)
(11.34)
E „ de dz , . .., .
— = £ — = — = 1 + f/ju" (11.35)
E, da da
E 1
— = ------ -------- r (1*36)
E l+^iff”' 1
See Fig. 11.15. N ow th e ta n g e n t m o d u lu s e q u a tio n can be w ritten as a single
expression w hich includes b o th th e long- a n d sh o rt-co lu m n ranges, since Eq.
(11.36) rep resen ts th e m o d u lu s of elasticity below as well as ab o v e th e elastic
lim it:
a . = ^ L = -£jL(^---- J---- (n .3 7 )
‘ ( £ /p) (% ) \ 1 + V 7
o
a= —
' °l
Figure 11.15
B = - ~ 4 !L = (11.38)
n jE /a !
11 = r— —
ii \ I.lut
Figure 11.16
344 a i r c r a f t s t r u c t u r e s
K„=— (11.39)
Cl
By su b stitu tin g these v alues from Eqs. (11.38) an d (11.39) into Eq. (11.37), th e
follow ing co lu m n e q u a tio n is o b ta in e d :
1 £,
( l] -4°)
€ = ^ ~ 5; (11.41)
v £ V E
1
II
J 7'
and e' = ? - V
1 ££ (11'42)
e* = 7* (1 - v2) (11 .4 4 )
E
BUCKLING DESIGN OF STRUCTURAL MEMBERS 3 4 5
Figure 11.17
n 2E I
p = (11.45)
(1 - v 2)i3
■
3 4 6 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
k E*
(11.46)
° CT “ 12(1 - v2)
(11.47)
(11.48)
P = aJib
Figure 11.19
BUC KLING DESIGN OF STRUCTURAL MEMBERS 3 4 7
F ig u re 11.20
ajb
* Figure 11.22
exam ple, is co m p ressed in a spanw ise d irection. I f th e strin g ers are flexible to r-
sionally, they will ro ta te as the sh eet b u ck les a n d will a c t a lm o st as sim ple
su p p o rts for the sh eet b etw een th e strin g ers, as sh o w n in F ig. 11.23a. If th e
strin g ers have co n sid erab le to rsio n a l rigidity, as d o the “ h a t ” sections an d the
(«)
(W
Figure 11,23
BUCKUNG DESIGN OF STRUCTURAL MEMBERS 349
sp ar flange sho w n in Fig. 11.23/j, they will ro ta te only slig h tly a n d will p ro v id e
alm o st clam ped edge co n d itio n s. In m o s t stru c tu re s, it is necessary to a ssu m e a
value for the term K o f Eq. (11.48) w hich will re p re se n t a co n serv ativ e m e a n
betw een sim ply su p p o rte d an d d a m p e d edge con d itio n s.
11.9 U L T I M A T E C O M P R E S S I V E S T R E N G T H O F IS O T R O P IC
FLA T SH EE T
Figure 11.24
3 5 0 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
Figure 11.25
2 w ac = P (11.49)
V /
K
it
W
i »• i
F ig u re 11.26
<*>
BUCKLING DISIGN OF STRUCTURAL MFMllERS 351
or
w = 0.95f
w = 0 .8 5 r (H -5 0 )
V oc
In o b ta in in g E q. (11.50), we assum e th a t th e sheet is free to ro ta te a t all fo u r
edges. In a c tu a l stru c tu re s som e degree o f re s tra in t alw ays exists, a n d the effective
w idths m a y be m u ch g re a te r in m a n y cases. T e sts in d ic a te th a t stringers p ro v id e
c o n sid erab le edge fixity a t low stresses, b u t d o n o t p ro v id e m uch re s tra in t at
stresses a p p ro a c h in g th e u ltim ate stre n g th o f th e strin g ers. N u m e ro u s o th e r e q u a
tions h av e been used in place o f Eq. (11.50); n o e q u a tio n s pro v id e a cc u ra te c o r
relatio n w ith test resu lts u n d e r all c o n d itio n s. U n c e rta in tie s regarding th e ef
fects o f edge re stra in ts in the actu al stru c tu re , a ccid en tal eccentricities in the
sheet, a n d th e effects o f stresses b ey o n d th e elastic lim it fu rth e r co m p licate th e
problem . E q u a tio n (11.50) yields a sm aller effective w id th th a n d o m o st o th e r
e q u a tio n s a n d is co n serv ativ e for use in design. F o r n o rm a l aircraft stru c tu re s in
w hich th e sheet is relatively thin, th e w eight p e n alty in tro d u c e d by u sin g Eq.
(11.50) is sm all; for high-speed aircraft in w hich the skin is relatively thick, a m o re
accu rate analysis m ay be justified.
T h e b u ck lin g stress for a flat sheet w ith a large ra tio o f length to w idth, w ith
one side sim ply su p p o rte d a n d the o th e r free, can be o b ta in e d from F.q. (11.48)
and Fig. 11.21. F o r K = 0.385, a c! = 0.385E (i/b )2. T h e u ltim ate lo ad resisted by
such a sheet w hen th e su p p o rted side is stressed by a value ac is fo u n d by
c o n sid erin g th a t an effective w idth resists th e stress a,, a n d by o b tain in g vvt as
b from Eq. (11.50):
a c = 0.385 i
or
vi1! = 0 .6 2 /
S o l u t i o n (a) T h e sh eet betw een the strin g e rs is sim piy su p p o rte d on all four
edges a n d h as d im e n sio n s o f a = 10, b = 5, a n d t = 0.040 in. F ro m Fig. 11.20,
for ct/b = 2.0 th e v alu e K = 3.62 is o b ta in e d . T h e b u c k lin g stress is ac =
K E {tjb )2 = 3.62 x 10,300,000(0.040/5)2 = 2390 Ib/in2. T h e edge o f th e sheet
has d im en sio n s o f a — 1 a n d b — 1 0 in a n d is sim ply su p p o rte d on three
1 in j . | 1 in
------- ►U--------5 i n --------- 4 - ---------5 in --------*-f*-------*
% = ^ T - r
(J Q 0 .0 4 0 in
to)
E /10,300,000
u- = 0.85 - = 0.85 x 0.040 / — ■ - = 1.09 in
V ffe V 10,000
T h e effective sheet a re a is
T h e to ta l com p ressiv e lo ad is
p = at A = 10,000(0.3 -I- 0.236) = 5360 lb
E 10,300,000
-u- = 0.85/ / — = 0.85 x 0.040 / ■ = 0.63 in
V ac V 30,000
[e
if , = 0.60/ / — = 0.44 in
V
A = 0.3 + (4 x 0.63 + 2 x 0.44) x 0.040 = 0.436 in 2
before buckling will o ccu r, as is th e case for s h o rt colum ns. E q u a tio n (11.48) w ill
be valid in this case if th e ta n g e n t m o d u lu s o f elasticity £ , is su b stitu te d fo r the
m o d u lu s E:
(11.52)
ff" = K E { -b
k 2E,
(11.54)
W p )2
T h e ta n g e n t m o d u lu s curve a n d o th e r cu rv es fo r sh o rt co lu m n s were p lo tte d w ith
values of <rc as o rd in a te s a n d v alues o f L jp as abscissas. V alues o f <r„ a n d b /t
could be sim ilarly p lo tte d from Eq. (11.53) for a k n o w n v alu e of K . In fact, th e
co lu m n cu rv es can be used for p lastic sh eet b u c k lin g if th e values of b /t are
m u ltiplied by a c o n sta n t w hich is o b ta in e d b y e q u a tin g th e right side o f Eq.
(11.53) an d th e rig h t side o f Eq. (11.54) as follow s:
. , L n b
E q u iv a le n t — - —7 = - (11.55)
P y /K t
A typical co lu m n curve fo r a n a lu m in u m -a llo y m a te ria l is show n in Fig.
11.29. T h e allow ab le co lu m n stress is o b ta in e d fro m th e c u rv e for a k now n value
f, jf) o r —a a - o r 1.65-
\/K t t
Figure 11.29
DUCKLING DESIGN OF STRUCTURAL MEMBERS 3 55
k E,
c 3(1 - v
3.62 E,
CT-= (11.56)
(s /tf
E q u iv a le n t— = —7 = - = 1.65 - (11-57)
P y /3 .6 2 * £
71 b n 4
—7 = - = —j = x ------- = 52.8
y /K <■ y /3 6 2 0.125
n b n 1
—7 = - = X ------- = 70.4
y/K f v/o.385 0 .0 7 2
T he type o f failure in d icated for this sectio n is typical o f crip p lin g failures for
a lu m in u m -allo y ex tru sio n s. T h e o rd in a ry sh o rt-c o lu m n cu rv es a p p ly only to
ro u n d tu b es o r to sta b le cro ss .sections w hich d o n o t crip p le locally. Since light
e x tru sio n s a re used extensively as co lu m n m em b ers in a irc ra ft stru ctu res, th e
subject o f c rip p lin g failure is very im p o rta n t a n d is d iscussed in detail later.
11.11 N O N D I M E N S I O N A L B U C K L I N G CURVES
ir r li- ( n -5 8 )
w here cra is the allo w ab le average stress fo r a co lu m n for sh eet buckling, o r for
crip p lin g , a n d cr, is the secan t yield stress c o rre sp o n d in g to the stress a t th e
in tersec tio n betw een th e stress-strain c u rv e a n d a line th ro u g h the origin h av in g
slo p e 0.7E.
F o r co lu m n s, th e term B is defined by E q. (11.38):
S = — ( 11. 38)
TCy f E/<T1
B — , b /t ■- (11.59)
n / E K ja ,
B= (11.60)
358 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
a c = a,cc (11.61)
o 3
II
F ig u re 11 32
BUCKLING DESIGN OF STRUCTURAL MEMBERS 3 5 9
h H h H
Figure 11.33
360 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURE
_ + a 3b3t3 Zabt
+ b 2 t2 + b3 13 Zbt
E xam ple 11.5 F in d the e q u a tio n o f th e sh o rt-c o lu m n curve for th e ex tru sio n
show n in Fig. 11.35 given th a t E = 10,700,000, n = 10, a n d crL = 37,000.
_ . , E n b b
E q u i v a l e n t — = — == — = 1 . 6 5 —
p V k 1 [
UUCKLING DESIGN OF STRUCTURAL MF.MnF.KS 361
b /t b
B = - ■ ■■ = 0.0308 -
V 10,700,000 x 3.62/37,000 t
1
4 tt2£
39,000{L /p )2
39,000 1 -
An1 10,700,000_
= 39,000[1 - 0.0000923(L/p)2]
= 41,000 lb /in 2
11.13 N E E D H A M A N D G E R A R D M E T H O D S F O R
D E T E R M IN IN G C R IP P L IN G ST R E SSE S
M o re recen t sem iem pirical m eth o d s th a n th a t o f Sec. 11.12 for the d eterm in a tio n
o f c rip p lin g stresses o f co lu m n s w ere dev elo p ed by N e e d h a m 4 5 an d G e ra rd .4 6 - 4 9
In the N e e d h a m m eth o d , th e stru c tu ra l m e m b e r se c tio n is divided in to angle
elem ents, as show n in Fig. 11.37. T h e c rip p lin g stre n g th o f these elem ents can be
estab lish ed by th e o ry a n d /o r tests. T h e crip p lin g failure stren g th o f th e m em b er
sectio n th en can be d eterm in ed by su m m in g th e crip p lin g stren g th s o f each angle
elem ent th a t m ak es u p th e to ta l section. T h ro u g h extensive tests N eed h a m a r
rived a t th e follow ing sem iem pirical e q u a tio n for th e crip p lin g stress o f angle
sections:
k e(Ec < x X 5 (11.63)
(6 '/f ) 0 ' 7 5
C ut
I
C u t-
C u t ------- -C u t
WJCKI.ING DESIGN OF STRUCTURAL MEMBERS 363
b' _ a + b
7 ~ 21
t11-64*
w here = m e m b e r sectio n crip p lin g stress
= /th angle crip p lin g stress, c a lc u lated from Eq. (11.63)
A; = ith an g le cro ss-sectio n al a re a
r /A
= 3.2ffr (11.65c)
_ ( E > „ ) W3J
w here A = scction a re a a n d tj = n u m b e r o f Ranges w hich m a k e up the scctio n
plus the n u m b e r o f c u ts req u ired to d ivide th e section in to a n u m b e r of flanges.
See Fig. 11.38. T h e m ax im u m crippling stress (7 „ m u st n o t exceed those specified
in T ab ic 11.1 unless it is verified experim entally.
3 6 4 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
I
(/>)
U) (</) (c)
Figure 11.38 (o) Basic angle section; g = 2; (b) tube; g = 4 cuts + 8 flanges = 12; (c) basic T section;
g = 3; (d) II section; g = 1 cut + 6 flanges = 7; (?) cruciform section; g = 0 cut +- 4 flanges = 4.
T a b l e 1 1.1
L 0.7 acr
T, + , H 0.8<rCJ,
Z, J, l j 0.9ctc,
D , multicorner 0.8<rcy
11.14 C U R V E D S H E E T I N C O M P R E S S I O N
Figure 11.40
3 6 6 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
(11.67)
T his e q u a tio n yields resu lts w hich are m uch h ig h er th an ex p erim en tal values in
HUC'KLINCi DISICiN Ol' STRUCTURAL MliMiiKRS 3 6 7
0.25/-:-
F ig u re 11.42
3 6 8 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES ,
F ro m E q. (11.67),
<
tCct = 4110 + 3690 = 7800 lb /in 2
1 1.15 E L A S T I C S H E A R B U C K L I N G O F F L A T P L A T E S
.,(11.69)
0 2 4 b S 10
ajb
Figure 11.44
w hen buck lin g occu rs, the w rinkles form a t a p p ro x im a te ly 45° angles to th e
edges. T h e b u ck lin g sh e a rin g stresses T cr are co n sid e ra b ly h ig h e r th a n the b u c k
ling co m p ressio n stresses erCcr for plates w ith e q u a l d im en sio n s. T h is is a resu lt o f
the restrain in g effect o f th e diag o n al te n sio n in th e p la te w h ich is load ed by
shearing forces.
T he critical b u ck lin g stresses in a th in p la te lo ad ed in b e n d in g as sh o w n in
Fig. 11.45 also can be c a lc u la ted th eo retically a n d ex p ressed in th e sam e form as
the eq u a tio n s fo r c o m p ressio n and sh e a r b u c k lin g :
(11.70]
alb
Figure 11.45
R'b-75 + R c = 1 (11.71)
C o m p ressio n and sh e a r:
R's -5 + R c = 1 (11.72)
B ending a n d sh ea r:
R l + R f= 1 (11.73)
w here R b, R s , an d R c rep resen t th e ra tio s o f th e stresses in th e plate to th e critical
bu ck lin g stresses ffA/crAcr, ac/a Ccr, a n d x jx „ .
t CC = K SE ^ J ( 1 1 .7 4 )
ri
Figure 11.46
3 7 2 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
11.47 is ap p lic a b le ; w hen th e axial length is g reater, Fig. 11.46 m ust be used. T h e
dim ension b is sm aller th a n the d im en sio n a in e ith er case. B oth figures apply
only to plates for w hich all fo u r edges a re sim ply su p p o rte d . T h e p o in ts at the left
side of the ch arts, for b 2/(rt) = 0 , c o rresp o n d to the b u ck lin g stress coefficients for
flat plates, as given in Fig. 11.44.
F o r design purp o ses, it is necessary to co n sid er the efleets o f initial accidental
eccentricities, w hich alw ays cause the b u ck lin g stresses to be sm aller th a n th e
theoretical values. O ften th e designer m u st use ju d g m e n t in e v alu a tin g these
effects for a p a rtic u la r stru c tu re . A n em p irical e q u a tio n is p ro p o se d :
t« = k e ( 0 + K i E ~r (11.75)
w here the first term re p resen ts the b u ck lin g stress for a flat p late, as given by Fig.
11.44, a n d th e last term represents the a d d itio n a l stress w hich c a n be resisted
bccause of th e cu rv a tu re. T h e value K x = 0.10 is reco m m en d ed . By rew ritin g Eq.
(1 1.75) aryd c o m p a rin g it to Eq. (11.74), the follow ing re la tio n s are o b tain e d :
( b2\ f t Y
^ = [K + K ' n ) E{ b )
X - = A + K- i — (11.76)
rt
rt
Figure 11.47
BUCKLING DESIGN OF STRUCTURAL MEMBERS 3 7 3
T h e values o f K s from Eq. (11.76) are p lo tte d as th e d o tte d lines in F igs. 11.46 a n d
11.47, assu m ing K x = 0.10. T h e values o b ta in e d fro m E q . (11.75) are seen to
represent co n serv ativ e a p p ro x im atio n s for all values sh o w n o n th e c h art, except
for th e case o f large values o f a/b an d b 2/{rt) sh ow n in Fig. 11.47. E x cep t for th is
range, Eq. (11.75) ap p ro x im a tes m ost o f the av ailab le test in fo rm a tio n closely a n d
conservatively and m ay be used in practical design. W hile th e th e o re tic al curves
o f Figs. 11.46 an d 11.47 apply only to p lates w ith sim ply su p p o rte d edges, E q.
(11.75) m ay be used w ith Fig. 11.44 for p lates w ith clam p ed edges o r for o th e r
edge co n d itio n s, by in te rp o la tio n of Fig. 11.44.
<js = x ta n a (11.78)
2 r
(11.79)
sin a cos a sin 2 a
T h e relatio n sh ip s expressed by Eqs. (11.77) to (11.79) m a y be o b ta in e d w ith
o u t the use o f the M o h r circle c o n stru c tio n b y referrin g to Fig. 11.486. T h e w eb
o f thickness t, w hich resists a m ax im u m tensile stress cr,, is assum ed to be re
placed by w ires a u n it d istan ce a p a rt w hich resist forces of <rt . T h e vertical
Iff) (M (c)
Figure 11.49
BUCKLING DESIGN OF STRUCTURAL MEMBERS 375
Figure 11.50
crx — a, c o s 2 a (11.82)
P = a..td = ~ - t a n a (11.83)
h
T h e vertical w eb ten sio n stresses also te n d to b e n d th e b ea m flanges in w ard .
T h e flanges act as c o n tin u o u s beam s su p p o rte d by th e stiffeners. If th e ends o f th e
3 7 6 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
72 P =avni p
= I- ->'tan a (a>
/fTTh\ /tT T k /fTTTx /TTTTk
V Y ' \
M =artd~/24 LM = ovfdz/12
( >)
a., td 2 Pd
M = ^ - = — (11.84)
-5 0 - J\
\
(1 = 1 0 \
\
/ = 0 .0 :0 - =\
^ r \
h=20 \
\
-\
\
V = 6 0 0 0 Ib
K
Figure 11.52
-3 0 0 0 !M
-1 8 ,0 0 0 lb
-is o o m
1500 lb Irrfrrtrrf rrtrfT
i 15001b 3 0 0 0 1b 1 3000 lb 3000 1b 15001b
" 1 ^ - 3 0 0 0 lb 3000 Ib
L . 300 Ib/in
t (f.0 0 0 1 b) -3 0 0 0 Ib
r -3 0 0 0 Ib
- 7 5 0 0 lb
3000 Ib
7 5 0 0 lb
1500 1b 3 0 0 0 1b 30001b 3000 1b 3000 1b 15001b
3 0 0 0 Ib J j j L-u U J I j j I j j 12.0 0 0 Ib
300 Ib/in
- 3000 l b ( [
mrnTflTIJf[I + 12000 lb
Figure H .53
378 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
/ig>- = ey ta n cc , ( 11.86 )
7i =
/i c o t a
Figure 11.54
BUCKLING DESIGN OF STRUCTURAL MEMBERS 379
Figure 11.55
y 2 = ex cot a (l 1-87)
T h e d iag o n al strip o f th e w eb h as a u n it e lo n g a tio n e a n d a length h/sin a. T h e
a n g u la r d e fo rm a tio n y 3 is o b ta in ed from th e g eo m etry o f F ig . 11.55c:
y3 = ~ — -------- (11-88)
sm a cos a
e
y = — e, ta n a — e , c o t a 4- —-------------- (11.89)
J sin a cos a
tan2 a = -— — (11.90)
e-e,
(11.91)
w here p is the rad iu s o f g y ra tio n o f the stiffener cro ss-sectio n al area and
11.19 S E M I T E N S I O N F IE L D B E A M S
(I - k)as (I - k)as
Figure 11.56
1.0
-
0.8
0.6
/I
ss
s '
//
0 .4
0. 2
aa aytd2 pd
a t stifTeners (11.84)
M " i r - : 12
ffr td 2 Pd
M = b etw een stiffeners (11.85)
24 24
(11.96)
hi
A.. Figure 1 158
3 8 4 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
34
32
30
- 28
. * 2
15
I 26
cT
24
2 *i
20
1 2 4 6 S 10 20 40 60 100
aJ°vt Figure 11.59
-'I
HUCKUNG DESIGN OF STRUCTURAL MEMBERS 385
'2 / 0 032V
K E\ = 8.1 x 9,700,000 x = 1260 lb /in 2
T he sh e a r stress is
V 10,000
= 19,500 ib /in 2
In ' 16 x 0.032
1 = 0.032
AN 430 AD 4 i in
I ' = 10,0001b AN 430 AD 5 <2 rivets)
/ „ = 0 .0 1 5 . in4
Figure 11.60
386 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
- A' = 1 + (0.416/0.37)2 = a ° 4 9 m 2
td 8 x 0.032
— = --------------= 5.22
Ae 0.049
x_ _ 19^500 _
■ Tcr 1260
F ro m Fig. 11.57, k = 0.53, a n d from Fig. 11.58, ta n a = 0.79. F ro m Fig. 11.59,
the allow able w eb stress is r lv = 20,400 lb /in 2. T h e m a rg in o f safety for the
w eb in sh e a r is
W eb M S = — - 1= - 1 = 0.04
t 19,500
2 0 9 0 ■= 19,200 lb /in 2
0.049 + 0.5(1 - 0.53) x 0.032 x 8
BUCKLING DESIGN OF STRUCTURAL MEMBERS 3 8 7
22,900
MS= I ^ - - 1 = 0 -15
M S 1- 0- 27
940
PROBLEM S
II.I A long column has an initial curvature defined by the equation y 0 —sin (nx/L). Derive an
equation for the additional deflection y by integrating Eq. (11.6). Show th at the center deflection <5 is
defined by
where Ptr is defined by Eq. (11.11). Compare values of t) + a from this equation to those obtained
from Eq. (11.14) for /7 P cr = 0.2,0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 0.9, 0.95, and 1.00.
11.2 From the expressions Ra = 1 - KB and R„ = 1JB2 derive Eqs. (11.24) and (11.31) by equating
the slopes of the Lwo curves at their point of tangcncy. Find the coordinates of the point of tangency.
11.3 From the expressions R0 — 1 — KB 2 and R„ = 1/ Bz derive Eqs. (11.23) and (11.29) by equating
the slopes of the two curves at their point of tangency. Find the coordinates of the point of tangency.
11.4 Find the column loads which may be resisted by round steel tubes heat-treated to an ultim ate
tensile strength of 180,000 Ib/in2, with the ends welded before heat treatm ent. The dimensions are:
3 8 8 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
T u b e size L
1 x 0.05 20 2
l | x 0.049 20
x 0.065 40 1
l i x 0.05 30 2
H.5 Repeat Prob. 11.4 Tor steel heat-treated to an ultimate tensile strength of 150,000 ib/in2.
11.6 Repent Prob. 11.4 for steel heat-treated to an ultim ate tensile strength of 125,000 lb/in2.
11.7 The skin of the upper side of an airplane wing is made of 2024-T6 Alclad. The stringer spacing is
5 in, and the rib spacing is 20 inT Assuming the edges to be simply supported, find the compression
buckling stress for skin gages of [a] 0 .020, (6 ) 0.032, (c) 0.040, and (f/) 0 .0 0 4 in.
11-8 Repeat Prob. 11.7, assuming the values of K to be the average of values-for simply supported
edges and clamped edges.
11.9 Calculate points on the curve for m = 1 of Fig. 11.20 for values of ajb of 0.25, 0.33, 0 .5 , 1, 2, 3,
and 4. Calculate points on the curve for m = 2 for values of ajb of 0 .50, 0.66, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8. Note the
similarity between the two curves, and devise a system of coordinates which would show all the
curves of Fig. 11.20 as a single curve.
11.10 Calculate the compression buckling stress for a sheet with a = S in. /; = 4 in, and t = 0.156 in.
The tangent modulus column curve for the material is shown iri Fig. 11.29.
(«) Assume all four edges are simply supported.
(/>) Assume all four edges are clamped.
(c) Assume the ends are simply supported and the sides arc free.
11.U Solve Prob. 11.10, using a dimcnsionless buckling curve for n = 10. Assume E = 10,700,000
and = 3 7 ,0 0 0 lb/in2.
11.12 Find the buckling stress for a colum n with {a} bolU ends fwed. (ty both ends free, (c) one end
fixed and one end free.
11.13 Use the Rayleigh-Ritz method to find the buckling load for a column with both ends pinned.
11.14 The skin on a fuselage is supported by stringers which are spaced at 5 in and by rings spaced at
20 in. Assume E = 107 Ib/in2 and an average between simply supported and clampcd-edge condi
tions. Find the shear buckling stresses for the fiat sheet if (a) t = 0.020, (/?) l = 0.032, (c) i — 0.040, and
[cl) t = 0.064 in.
11.15 Plot the axial loads in the flanges and stifieners of a pure tension field beam similar to that
shown in Fig. 11.46 with h = 10 in, d = 10 in, and V = 10,000 lb. Compute the flange bending
moments and the load per inch on all rivets. Assume a == 45°.
11.16 Solve Example 11.5 by the Needham m ethod and the G erard method. Compare your results.
11.17 Solve Example 11.6 by the Needham m ethod and the G erard method. Compare your results.
CH A PTER
TWELVE
JOINTS A N D FITTINGS
12.1 I N T R O D U C T I O N
389
390 A IRCRAFT STRUCTURES
n s r
u n
i I
Jr-I rI f rl I I
ittr T± ± r
ih)
1
(/
uJ
Figure 12.1
JOINTS AND FITTINGS 391
<r = 7 (1 2 . 1 )
A
MS = — — 1 (12.2)
a
P lb/rivet
(«)
Figure 12.4
3 9 2 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
4P
t = - ; (12.3)
nd2
' (12-4)
(12-5)
= ^ (1 1 6 )
(s - d)t (11?)
0 .5 ( 0 5 f r " n
15,000 lb 1
com pression l
j I
!
12.000 Ib 1
tcm iu n t 1
■ LO J
Figure 12.5
3 9 4 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
D esign fitting lo a d s:
D esign b e a rin g lo a d s:
4 x 13,500 ,
T = _ 7r(0.5p ~i ’ /ln
'>' = d § T 5 3 - lw )0 0 lb /i“’
T h e ten sio n lo ad m ust b e used in c alc u latin g the tc a r-o u t stress, since the
co m p ressio n lo ad p ro d u ce s no stress o n this cross sectio n . F ro m Eqs. (12.5)
JOINTS AND FITTINGS 395
Figure 12.6
and ( 1 2 .2 ),
21,600
= 37,400 lb /in 2
2 x 0.5125 x 0.5625
39,000
and includes fittin g facto r
MS = ^ - 1 = ° - 0 4
21,600
34,000 lb /in 2
2 x 0.562 x 0.5025
39,000
an d MS = 0.14 includes fittin g facto r
34,200
T h e ten sio n stress th ro u g h the b o lt h o le is o b ta in e d fro m Eq. (12.6):
21,600
= 49,600 lb /in 2
(1.4 - 0.625)0.5625
65,000
MS = - 1 — 0.13 includes fittin g facto r
49,600
P Pi 6 P 3P
a = bt± ^ 2 b ? =Bbi± Tt ( 1 2 ‘8 )
A t the inside faces o f th e p lates, the tensile stress from E q. (12.8) is AP/A, a n d at
the o u tsid e faces the com p rcssiv e stress is 2 P /A , as show n.
In o rd e r for the p in to b e in eq u ilib riu m u n d e r th e b e a rin g stresses, it m u st
b e a r o n o p p o site c o m e rs o f the hole, as sh o w n in Fig. 12.106. T h e m o st o p ti
m istic a ssu m p tio n o f b ea rin g stresses is th e straig h t-lin e a ssu m p tio n sh o w n in
Fig. 12.10c, w hich yields m ax im u m b e a rin g stresses 4 P fttb ) a t th e inside c o rn e r
an d 2P /(tb) a t th e o u ts id e corners. If th e p in do es n o t fit tig h t in th e hole, th e
3 9 8 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
Figure 12.10
O O
O O
I R Figure 12.14
12.4 E C C E N T R I C A L L Y L O A D E D C O N N E C T IO N S
A'r.i
\
Figure 12.15
4 0 2 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
. „ RA
(12.9)
R
Pc = - (12.10)
Pe = K rA (12.11)
M — Z P cr = K Z r 2A (12.12)
(m 3 )
E q u a tio n (12.13) is sim ilar in form to th e c o m m o n eq u a tio n s for b en d in g o r
torsion.
T h e re su lta n t force P o n an y rivet can b e d eterm in ed now from th e co m
p o n e n t forces P c a n d P e , as sh o w n in Fig. 12.15c. W hen an algebraic so lu tio n is
desired, u sually it is m o re co n v en ie n t to o b ta in th e h o riz o n ta l an d vertical co m
p o n en ts o f the riv et forces. T h e distan ce r does n o t need to be calcu lated if th e
c o o rd in ates x a n d y a re used. F ro m Fig. 12.16 an d Eq. (12.13), th e follow ing
eq u atio n s for th e c o m p o n e n ts P rx a n d Pn . a re o b ta in e d :
Rivel .V i’ x2 P ., P, p', P
(i) (2 ) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) ( 10) ( ii) ( 12 )
Z 6 9.00
■ r ^
40 4 a i r c r a f t s t r u c t u r e s
Figure 12.17
12.5 W ELD ED JO IN T S
^0° o r less
£ 3
Figure 12.18
bccause m ore h eat is re q u ired for th e heavy m em ber. T h e thickness ra tio o f p arts
b eing w elded sh o u ld alw ays be less th a n 3 :1 a n d p referab ly less th a n 2 :1 .
T h e allow able lo a d o n th e weld m etal in w elded seam s is specified in M IL -
H D B K -5 by the follow ing e q u a tio n s:
to)
F ig u re 12.20
or
P a = 28,000 lb
T h e fitting fa c to r o f 1.20 m ust be in clu d ed in th e c a lc u la tio n o f the m a rg in o f
safety:
P., . 28,000
1= 1 = 0.04
1.20P 1.2 x 22,500
26,400
MS - 1 = 0 .1 7
22,500
0r '
P a = 4(5,400 lb
T he design lo ad is .
46,400
MS = ■ ’ 1 . 2 - 1 = 0 .1 8
33,000
T he allow ab le tensile stress in the tu b e n ear the w eld is c,u, and
52,700
M S = ~ ~ - 1 = 0.60
33,000
PROBLEM S
I2.J An end filling similar to those shown in Figs. 12.5 and 12.6 is made of slcel wilh an ultimate
tensile strength o,„ or 180,000 lb/in 1 and has no bushing. It has a^-in steel bolt in double shear, a
thickness of 0.5 in, and dimensions R = 0.5 and e = 0.05 ill, as shown in Fig. 12.6. Find the maximum
limit loads in tension and in compression if the fining factor is 1.2 and the bearing factor is 1 .0.
.Obtain allowable stresses from M ILHDBK-5.
12.2 Design a fitting to resist a limit tension load of 15,000 and a limit compression load of 20,000 Ib.
Assume the materials and unit stresses to be the same as those used in Prob. 12.1.
12.3 Design an end fitting of steel with an ultimate tensile strength of 125,000 lb/in2. The applied or
limit loads are 15,000-lb tension and 20,000-lb compression. Use a fitting factor of 1.2 and a bearing
factor of 2.0.
12.4 Find the margin of safety for the joint shown in Fig. 12.17 if Rx = 3000 Ib, Ry = 200 lb, and the
rivets are m ade of |-in-diam eter 2017-T.j in single shear. The plate is 0.072 gage 2024-T3 d a d
aluminum.
12.5 Assume the tube of Fig. 12.20 to be 2 by 0.083 in witli /, = 0.2, £ , = 3.0, and L 2 = 4.0 in. Find
Ihe allowable load P if (a) the tube has an allowable stress <7,„ of 95,000 lb /in 2 and (6) the assembly is
heat-treated after welding to a tensile strength <r,u of 150,000 lb/in2.
APPEND IX
________________________________A
M OM ENTS OF INERTIA, M O H R’S CIRCLE
A .l C E N T R O I D S
(A.2)
dW (A 3)
409
4 1 0 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
Figure A.l
Zzvv
or (A.6)
IF"
T h e su m m atio n s o r in teg rals for E qs. (A.4) to (A.6) m u st include all elem ents o f
th e body. In m a n y en g in eerin g pro b lem s, th e w eights a n d c o o rd in a te s o f th e
various item s a re k n o w n , an d th e cen te r o f g rav ity is o b ta in e d by a su m m a tio n
p ro ced u re, ra th e r th a n by a n in te g ra tio n p ro ced u re.
In th e case o f a p la te of u n ifo rm th ick n ess a n d d e n sity w hich lies in th e x y
plane, as show n in Fig. A.2, the c o o rd in a tes o f th e c en te r o f grav ity are
J x dA
(A.7)
W wA A
MOMENTS OF INERTIA, MOHR’S CIRCLE 411
_ _ J y d W _ wj y dA _ j y d A
(A.8)
^ W wA A
w here A is the area o f th e p la te an d >v is the w eight p e r u n it area. I t is seen th a t
th e co o rd in a te s x a n d y will be the sam e reg ard less o f th e th ick n ess o r w eight of
the plate. In m a n y eng in eerin g p roblem s, th e p ro p e rtie s o f a re a s a re im p o rta n t,
a n d th e p o in t in th e a re a h av in g co o rd in ates x a n d j; as d efined b y E qs. (A.7) a n d
(A.8) is called th e centroid o f th e area.
Lj = a r2 d M
as show n in F ig. A.3. T h e term u n d e r the in teg ral sign is d efined as the m o m en t
o f in e rtia o f th e m ass a b o u t the z axis:
Iz = r2 dM (A.9)
or
I. = x 2 dM + y2 dM (A-10)
Figure A.4
r 2 dA (A.l 3)
r2 = x 2 + y 2
x 2 dA + y 2 d A = Iy + I x (A. 14)
x 2 dA (A. 15)
(d + x ? dA
= d2 dA 4- 2d x ’ dA + x ' 5 dA
or
Iy = Ad2 + 2X' Ad + I'y (A. 16)
w here x! rep resen ts the d istan ce of the c e n tro id o f th e a re a from the / axis, as
defined in E q. (A.7), /'. rep re se n ts the m o m e n t o f in ertia o f th e a rea a b o u t th e y'
axis, and A represen ts the to ta l area. E q u a tio n (A.16) is sim plified w hen the y'
axis is th ro u g h the cen tro id o f th e area, as show n in Fig. A .6:
Iy = A d 2 + Jc (A. 17)
Figure A.5
/. = r2 d M = ( x 2 + y 2) d M
l(d + x ' Y + y 2] d M
I. = d2 d M + 2d x' dM + r2 d M
Since x ' is m easu red from the cen tro id al axis, th e second in te g ral is zero. T h e last
integral rep resen ts the m o m en t of in ertia a b o u t th e c e n tro id a l axis:
l z = M d2 + Ic (A. 18)
414 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
or
(A. 19)'
(A.20)
P =
• T h e m o m cn l of in ertia o f an area is o b ta in e d as th e p ro d u c t o f an a re a -a n d
the sq u are of a d istan ce an d usually is expressed in u n its o f inches to th e fo u rth
pow er. T h e m o m en ts o f in e rtia for the co m m o n a re a s sh o w n in Fig. A.S should
— /.—
1 '
-iri c i
t
wl
Ffaurc A.8
MOMENTS OF INERTIA, MOHR’S CIRCLE 415
Eivx 50,723
= 12.16
W 4243
£ u!z 26,109
= 6.2
~W ~' 4243
T ab le A .l
- 2 in-*-
> in
©
> ' ^ N
©\ t
2ii" 1 © i
p ----------- 6 i n -------------
XAy 79.5
y - — T~ = ~ ^ r = 2.94 in
A 27
T h e m o m en t of in e rtia o f th e to ta l a re a a b o u t th e x ax is w ill be o b tain ed as
th e su m o f the m o m e n ts o f in e rtia o f th e elem ents a b o u t th is axis. In finding
the m o m e n t of in ertia o f an y elem ent a b o u t the x axis, Eq. (A.17) m ay be
w ritte n as
Ix = A y 1 + I q
T ab le A.2
1 12 1 12 12 4.0
2 1.5 2.5 3.75 9.4 0.2
3 1.5 2.5 3.75 9.4 0.2
4 12 5 60 300 36.0
Tolal 27.0 79.5 330.8 40.4
MOMENTS OF INERTIA, MOHR’S CIRCLE 417
Ic = / , - (TA )y2
E xam ple A.3 in a m etal stressed-skin a irp la n e w ing, th e sh eet-m etal co v erin g
acts w ith th e s u p p o rtin g spanw ise sp ars a n d strin g ers to form a beam w h ich
resists the w ing b en d in g . F igure A .l l a sh o w s a cross se c tio n o f a typical w in g
w hich h as a vertical w eb and ex tru d ed angle sections riv eted to the sp ar w eb
an d to th e skin. T h e stringers are e x tru d e d Z sectio n s w hich are riveted to
the skin. T h e u p p e r su rface o f the w ing is in c o m p ressio n , a n d the sh eet-m etal
skin buckles betw een th e stringers a n d is ineffective in c arry in g load. T h e
418 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
skin is riveted lo th e strin g ers a t freq u en t in terv als, a n d a n a rro w strip o f skin
ad ja c e n t to e a c h strin g e r is p revented fro m b u c k lin g a n d acts w ith the strin g
e r in carry in g co m p ressiv e lo ad . T h e effective w id th of sk in a ctin g w ith each
strin g er is u su ally a b o u t 30 tim es th e skin thickness. O n th e u n d ersid e o f the
wing, the en tire w id th of th e sk in is effective in resistin g ten sio n . It is usually
sufficiently acc u ra te to assum e the a re a o f each strin g er a n d its effective skin
to b e c o n c e n tra te d a t the c e n tro id o f its a re a in c o m p u tin g th e m o m en t o f
in ertia o f th e are a . T h e w ing cro ss scctio n w o u ld th e n b e rep resen ted by th e
nine elem ents o f a re a sh o w n in Fig. A .llb . T h e m o m e n t o f in e rtia o f each
clem ent a b o u t its o w n C en tro id is neglected. In th is p a rtic u la r wing, the skin
a n d strin g ers to th e rig h t o f th e s p a r a re very lig h t a n d are assum ed to be
n o n stru c tu ra l.
T h e m o m e n t o f in e rtia o f the a re a sh o w n in F ig. A .l lb is o b ta in e d a b o u t
h o riz o n ta l a n d vertical axes th ro u g h th e c e n tro id o f th e to ta l area. T h e areas
an d co o rd in a te s o f th e elem ents are g iven in co lu m n s 2, 3, a n d 6 o f T ab le A.3.
T h en .* = ^ = - 1 1 . 5 6
7.135
I , c = 2310 - 7 J3 5 (1 1 .5 6 2) = 1358 in 4
4.72
Z' = ^35 = a66
IAC = 331.6 - 7.135(0.662) = 328 in 4
T able A.3
Element A ■X Ax A x2 z Az A z1
(0 (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)
(A.21)
T he co o rd in a te / o f a n y p o in t is
y' = y cos $ — x s'm (j> (A.22)
Ixy x y dA (A.24)
F ig u r e A .12
4 2 0 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
Ix + I? = I x' + l y
F ro m Eq. (A.14), the sum o f th e m o m en ts o f in e rtia a b o u t an y tw o p erp en d icu lar
axes is seen to be eq u a l to the p o la r m o m e n t o f in ertia, w hich is the sam e
regardless o f the angle <p o f th e axes.
T h e p ro d u c t o f in e rtia a b o u t the .v' a n d / axes is defined as follow s:
and
A .4 P R I N C I P A L A X E S
Sincc there a re tw o angles u n d e r 360° w hich have the sam e tangent, Eq. (A.29)
defines tw o values o f the an g le 2rp, w hich w ill be a t 180° intervals. T h e tw o
co rre sp o n d in g values o f th e angle cp will be a t 90° interv als. It can be sh o w n th a t
the value o f Ix, will be a m ax im u m a b o u t o n e o f these axes an d a m inim um a b o u t
MOMENTS OF INERTIA, MOHR’S CIRCLE 421
A n im p o rta n t re la tio n is o b ta in e d Tor the angle a t w hich I xlyl is zero. S u b stitu tin g
I xfy, = 0 in Eq. (A.32) p ro d u ce s
tan 2 c/> =
L - K
T his is id en tical to th e ex p ressio n defining the p rin cip al axes in E q. (A.29). T he
p ro d u c t o f in ertia a b o u t th e p rin c ip a l axes is th erefo re zero.
T he m o m en ts o f in e rtia a b o u t the p rin cip al axes m ay be o b ta in e d by su b sti
tu tin g the value o f 4> o b ta in e d from Eq. (A.29) in to E q. (A.25):
and _ ^ = + (A'34)
Figure A. 13
xy dA = 0
x y dA
y = k + v
(h + u)(k + v) d A
hk dA + h v dA + k u dA + up dA
= h k A + IwA + k u A + I u (A. 3 5)
Figure A. 14
S '
MOMENTS OF INERTIA, MOHR’S CIRCLE 4 2 3
W ith u a n d v axes a lso p rin cip al axes o f th e are a, Iuv = 0 a n d E q . (A.36) becom es
I xy = h k A (A.37)
I x}, = h k A = - 3 x 5 x 8 = - 1 2 0 in 4
F o r rectangle C,
I xy = hkA = 3 x - 5 x 8 = - 1 2 0 in 4
F o r th e to ta l area,
I ly = 0 - 120 - 120 = - 2 4 0 in 4
If;
4 2 4 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
4 x 2.5 '
— -1 .0
_ 6 x 2.5
■ /— To— 1-5
^ xy xyA 4 -1 y c
0 = 1.0 x 1.5 x 10 + I Xcyc
or I Xcfc = —15 in 4
S o l u t i o n T h e p ro d u c t o f in e rtia a b o u t th e x a n d z axes is o b ta in e d as th e
su m m a tio n of th e term s A x z , in co lu m n 5 o f T a b le A.4. T h e cen tro id al axes
w ere fo u n d in E x am p le A.3 to h av e c o o rd in a te s x = — 11.56, z = 0.66. F ro m
Eq. (A.36),
I xz = x z A + l Xc
or I ^ 2e = - 1 3 .8
T able A.4
Elemcnl A X z A x2
(t) (2) (3) (4) (5)
l 0.358 -3 4 .5 + 8^6 -1 0 6 .2
2 0.204 -2 8 .1 + 9 .6 -5 5 .0
3 0.395 - 1 9 .9 + 10.0 -7 8 .5
4 0.204 - 10.1 + 9.6 -1 9 .8
5 1.615 + 0.5 + 8.8 7.1
6 1.931 + 0.5 - 5 .7 - 5 .5
7 0.752 - 10.1 - 5 .2 39.5
8 0.784 - 2 2 .4 - 4 .3 75.9
9 0.892 -3 4 .7 - 2 .4 74.3
Total 7.135 - 68.2
MOMENTS OF INERTIA, MOHR’S CIRCLE 4 2 5
A .6 M O H R ’S C I R C L E F O R M O M E N T S O F I N E R T I A
sin 2 8 = 2 — 2 cos 28
c o s2 0 = 2 + i cos 20
S u b stitu tin g these v alu es in Eq. (A.38) yields
I x, = cos 28 (A.40)
F ro m E x am p le A.4,
I xy = - 2 4 0 in 4
Figure A.18
MOMENTS OF INERTIA, MOHR’S CIRCLE 427
or 0 = 21.35°
T h e p rin cip al ax es a re rep resen ted b y p o in ts P a n d Q o n th e circle. T h e
m o m en ts o f in e rtia h av e m ax im u m a n d m in im u m values, a n d th e p ro d u c t of
in ertia is zero fo r th ese axes. T h e p rin c ip a l m o m e n ts o f in e rtia are eq u al to
the d istan ce fro m th e o rig in to th e c e n te r o f the circle p lu s o r m inus th e
rad iu s o f th e circle:
I p = 433.3 + 353.8 787.1 in 4
* l q = 433.3 - 353.8 = 79.5 in4
Figure A .19
4 2 8 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
z. r
R ad iu s = V 4 2 0 2 + 12Q2 = 437
ta n 2 2 0 = 15.94°
or 9 = 7.97°
Figure A.21
MOMENTS OF INERTIA, MOHR’S CIRCLE 4 2 9
A .7 M O H R ’S C I R C L E F O R C O M B I N E D S T R E S S E S
A sin 0
Figure A .24
Figure A.23
U sing the trig o n o m etric re la tio n s for fun ctio n s o f d o u b le an g les yields
c o s2 0 = 2 + 2 c o s 20
sin 2 0 = j — i co s 26
a„ = co s 20 (A.43)
t = ~ ° s sin 26 (A.44)
;ooo nviii-’
4 3 2 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
-2,OCX
+4,50(
Figure A.27
R a d iu s = J 6 0 0 Q 2 + 4 5 0 0 2 = 7500
26.57° clockw isc from the vertical, sincc p o in t S is twice this angle clockw ise
from p o in t A o n the circle. P lan e S is also 45° clockw ise from plane P, a n d
p lan e R is 45° co u n terclo ck w ise from p lan e P. T h e sh ea rin g stress on p lan e R
is positive, te n d in g to ro ta te the elem en t clockw ise. T h e sh earin g stress o n
p lan e S is negativ e, len d in g to ro ta te th e clem en t co unterclockw ise.
P lanes E an d F a re 30° co u n terclo ck w isc from p lan es A a n d B. P o in ts E
a n d F o n th e c irc le -m u st be 60° co u n terclo ck w ise fro m p o in ts A a n d B,
respectively. T h e stresses on plane E a re o b ta in e d by c a lc u la tin g the c o o rd i
n ates of p o in t E o n th e circlc:
t = 7500 sin 23.14" = 2950 lb /in 2
<r„ = 4000 + 7500 cos 23.14° = 10,900 lb /in 2
T h e stresses on p lan es £ an d F a rc sh o w n in Fig. A .28c in the c o rre c t
d irections. -
T he stresses on p lan e G, w hich is 60° co u n terclo ck w ise from the v ertical
p la n e A, arc
B _______
M ATRIX ALG EBRA
k\2
m = &2i k 22 k2j- ( i = 1, 2, 3 , . . . ; ; = 1 , 2 , 3 , . . . ) (B .l)
k i2 k<j _
f
k 12 ■” k ln
k 2\ kzz •** k 2n (B.2)
k„2
434
MATRIX ALGEBRA 435
and is w ritten as
i
{*} k 21 (i = 1 , 2 , 3 , . . . ) (B.4) '
D ia g o n a l, Id e n tity a n d N u ll M a tr ic e s
fcn 0 ... 0
[K] = 0 k22 ^ (B.5)
0 0 ^11
An identity, o r m a trix [ X ] is a d iag o n al m a trix w h o se m a in -d iag o n al el
em en ts k u — 1 (/ = _/'):
" 1 0 ... 0
0 1 ... 0 (B.6)
[K ] = (7] =
,0 0 ... 1
0 0
(B.7)
[K ] = 0 0
0 0
S y m m e tr ic a n d T r a n s p o s e d M a tr ic e s
A sq u are m atrix [A '] is said to be symmetric if th e follow ing h o ld s tru e :
ku ku
[K ] = (B.9)
ku k 2i
43 6 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
fcn k 2l
[K ]r = k 12 k 22
_ k 2j _
D e te r m in a n ts
cv = ( - l ) ,+'M u (B.13)
2 1 6
[K] = 3 5 4 («).
.2 2 1,
&i3 = 6 , k 23 = 4, k 33 = 1
Ilcn ce
r t 3 = /U 13 c 23 = —M 23 c32 = M 33
As defined prev io u sly , the m in o r M u , o r the given m atrix in Eq. (a) is th e
d eterm in an t of the m a trix resulting from d ele tin g the first ro w a n d the th ird
colum n, c o rre sp o n d in g to su b scrip ts 1 an d 3 o n M l 3 . O r,
MU = P J = 3 x 2 - 5 x 2 = - 4
2 2
Sim ilarly,
2 1
M 21 = = 2 x 2 —1 x 2 = 2
2 2
2 1
M ,, = = 2 x 5 —1 x 3 = 7
3 5
Therefore,
= -4 C2S — — 2 c 33 = 7
and the d e te rm in a n t is
|K | = 6( —4) + 4( —2) + 1(7) = - 2 5
P r o p e r tie s o f D e te r m in a n t s
1. In terch an g in g a n y tw o row s o r co lu m n s o f a d e te rm in a n t ch an g es the sign o f
the d e te rm in a n t:
2 5 11 10 5 2
15
1 10 ~ 2 5 10 1
6
5 = 0
10
C o lu m n 3 is d e p e n d e n t o n colum ns I a n d 2:
C o lu m n 3 = c o lu m n 1 + c o lu m n 2
10 5 1 = 20
6 10 61
4 3 8 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
2 I 6 7 3 1 2 2 4 4
4 6 4 6 10 6 4 8 4 6
ro w 2 co lu m n 2 h a lf o f h alf of
ad d ed a d d e d to co lu m n 1 ro w 2
to ro w 1 co lu m n 1 a d d e d to ad d e d to
c o lu m n 2 ro w 1
Singular Matrices
T h e m atrix [K ] is said to b e singular if th e value o f its d e te rm in a n t is zero.
4 2
If
8 4
4 2
T h en |K | = = 16-16 = 0
8 4
Matrix Addition
T w o m atrices [B ] an d [C ] o f o rd e r m x n can b e ad d ed by a d d in g each elem ent
bij o f m atrix [B ] to the c o rre sp o n d in g elem en t cy o f m atrix [ C ] :
‘ 6X1 c 12
=
^11 + C11 ^12 + C12
+
>21 b2 2 . _c 21 C22_ L b2l + c21 b 22 + c22_
Matrix Subtraction
M a trix su b tra c tio n is sim ila r to m atrix a d d itio n except elem en ts by a n d c,j are
su b tra c te d in stead o f b eing a d d e d :
(B.19)
w here Piji — T j biscsJ (i — 1, 2 , . . . , m ; j — 1, 2, . . . , r)
1 £ J = [2 1 4 ] 1*3
2 1 3x2
cn = 4 2
L3 5_
= |B Jlx3[C ];' x2
‘2 1'
4 2
[2 1 4] = [20 24]
L3 5 J
or P ij = I! ctj = bn c ij + b n C2j + b i 3 C 3j
k-i
F o r i = 1 an d j = 1,
P u = b t ir u + b l 2 c 2l + b t i c3l
= 2x 2+1 x4 + 4x3=20
F o r i = I and ./ = 2,
Pi 2 = b n c i2 + b l 2 c 22 + b 1 3 c 3 2
= 2 x 1 + 1 x 2 + 4 x 5 = 24
2. C o m m u tativ e law : :
M M * D BM
3. A ssociative law :
I . 1
<3 Q
ban
-<
f l u
b =
_bd21 ba 22_
IN
~ a ll
1
«1 1 a i2 b b
b - a 21 a 12_
I
Matrix Inversion
T he inverse o f a sq u a re n o n sin g u lar m a trix [/£]> d e n o te d by [ K ] - 1 , c a n be
defined as an o p e ra tio n in m atrix alg e b ra a n a lo g o u s to division in o rd in ary
algebra. A m o n g th e m a n y techniques u sed fo r in v e rtin g a m atrix , o n ly tw o a re
presented here.
T o in v ert a m a trix [/<C] w hich m u st be sq u a re an d n o n sin g u lar, d o the
follow ing:
Adj C/C] = [C ]
2. T ra n sp o s e th e a d jo in t m a trix :
T ran sp o se [ C ] = [ C ] r
~5 2
[K] = 2 1
F irst, find [C ], th e ad jo in t o f [ K ] :
T herefore, [C ] = *
L-2 5
Second, tran sp o se [ C ] :
[ C ] 7' =
-2
T h ird , find Ihe d e te rm in a n t o f [ K J :
|K | = 5 x 1 - 2 x 2 = 1
F o u rth , divide [C V by |K |:
[c y -2
or
\k \
-2
5.
C heek the results:
[K ][K ] [/]
1
1
1
(N
5 2
1
2
o
l_ L - 2 5J
j
[K ] = M O T (B.22)
but OT = M r (B.23)
(B.24)
4 4 2 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
[ X ] - 1 = [ L r ] - 1[ L ] - 1 (B.25)
or [ K ] - 1 = [ S ] r [SJ (B.26)
w here [S ] = [ L ] - 1 (B.27)
i-1 \ 1/2
2
1
hj = i.___ V i - i ; i
^ii / = 1 iw ‘mj
1> j (B.28)
hj
o i <j
i =j
‘>j (B.29)
0 i< j
m = i x r 1 = LS]Tr a = r a t s ]
^ ij Z j
m~ 1
s,„i = 0 (. < m)
L et us co n sid er the follow ing 2 x 2 sy m m etric m a trix :
'2 3~
[K ]
3 5
i
F ro m Eq. (B.28),
/ i i = ( f c n )1/J = V ^
3_
MATRIX ALGEBRA 4 4 3
2-1 \ 1/2
lz2 = ( k 2 2 - ^ Z H nJ = ik22 _ n i} m
= (5 — f ) 1/2 =
F ro m Eq. (B.29),
522 = r= v^
_ V 1 S 2 m L ,l
- - L -----
BI=I '11
= - S w S )
S-
-3
.v,, = 0
Or i
0
r a =
-3
^
1 - 3
S- ,n/2
K T = [S ] =
0 y /l
F ro m Eq. (B.30),
= E — 5 jx5[ | + 5 i 2 ^ i
J _3
+
V i S-
= 5
4 4 4 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
, , I2 = Zsi„,*„,2 — S , l S l 2 + ^ 1 2 -s 22
m- I
1 —3
—j= 0 + —7= y / l
r
= - 3 = /i21
72 J2
2
= 0(0) + 7 2 (7 2 ) = 2
H cncc
5
[ K ] ’ 1 = [H ] =
-3
P r o p e r tie s o f th e In v e rs e o f a M a t r ix
M a t r i x P a r t it io n i n g
^ 1 2 I ^ 1 3 ^ 1 4 I ^ 1 5
[ /c ] =
o ^ 2 1
^3 1
k 22
k i2 |
| ^ 2 3
k ' 33
^ 2 4
k 34.
j
J
^ 2 5
^ 3 5
© _ ^ 5 1 k-5 2
1--------------------------------------1-
1 k 53 k 54 1 ^ 5 5 _
[K
U -J
I—i
12] [ £ , 3]
1_________________1
1—
[ K j j ] [ ^ 23]
1
[£31] [ * 3 J [ £ 33]
* .l
w here [ K n ]
.* 2 ! ^22,
4.
[* iJ
_^23 k 24_
^15
[K n ]
_^25.
MATRIX ALGEBRA 445
P r o p e r tie s o f P a r t it io n e d M a tr ic e s
B .3 S I M U L T A N E O U S L I N E A R A L G E B R A I C E Q U A T I O N S
k 2i k 22 ■■■ k 2„ q2 = Qi (B.32)
_fcni Ki K Jl .
In s h o rth a n d m a trix n o ta tio n , Eq. (B.32) c a n be w ritte n as
m { q } = {fi} (B.3 3)
2<?i + 3 ? 2 = 14
(a)
3iji + 5 q2 - 22
2 3" <3i “ t4 ‘
(b)
3 5_ A i . _22_
- 1 '1 4
'/! '2 3"
(c)
.3 5_ _22_
4 4 6 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
.3 5_ - 3 2_
REFERENCES
L Bruhn, E. F.: “Anaylsis and Design of Flight Vehicle S tructures” Tri-state Offset Co., Cincin
nati, Ohio, 1965.
2. Hoff, N. J.: High Temperature Effects in Aircraft Structures, Pergamon, New York, 1958.
3. Metallic M aterials and Elements for Flight Vehicle Structures, M ilitary Handbook MIL*
HDBK-5A, 1968.
4. Wang, C. T.; Applied Elasticity, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1953.
5. Bolcy, B. A., and J. H. Weiner: Theory o f Thermal Stresses* Wiley, New York. 1960.
6. Von K arm an, T. L., L. G. Dunn, and H. S. Tsicn: “ T he influence of Curvature on the Buckling
Characteristics of Structures," J. Aeronaut. Set., May 1940, p. 276.
7. Cozzone, F. P., and M. A. M clcon: “ Non-dimensional Buckling Curves —Their Development
and Application,*' J. Aeronaut. Sri., Oct. 1946. p. 511.
8. Shanley, F. R.: “ Inelastic Column Theory,” J. Aeronaut. Sri., May 1947, p. 2ft 1.
9. Tim oshenko, S. P.. and J. M. Gere: Mechanics o f Materials, Van Nostrand, Princeton, N J.,
1972.
10. Azar. J. J.: M atrix Structural Analysis, Pergamon, New York, 1972.
11. Sechler, E. E.: Elasticity in Engineering, Wiley, New York, 1952.
12. Rivello, Robert M .: Theory and Analysis o f Flight Structures, M cGraw-Hill, New York. 1969.
13. Timoshenko, S. P., and J. N. G oodier: Theory o f Elasticity, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1951.
14. Chou, P. C., and N. J. Pagano: Elasticity, Van N ostrand, Princeton. N J., 1967.
15. Tim oshenko, W. P., and J. M. Gere: Theory o f Elastic Stability, M cGraw-Hill, New York, 1961.
16. Shanley, F. R.: W eight-Strength Analysis o f Structures, M cGraw-Hill, New York, 1962.
17. BIcich, F.: Buckling Strength o f Metal Structures, M cGraw-Hill, New York, 1952.
18. G erard, G.: Introduction to Structural Stability Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1962.
19. Romberg, W.* and W. R. Osgood: Description o f Slress-Strain Curves by Three Parameters,
NACA Tcch. N ote 902, July 1943.
20. Gassner, E.; “ Effect of Variable Load and Cum ulative Dam ages on Fatigue in Vehicle and
Airplane Structures," Proceedings o f International Conference on Fatigue o f Metals, British Insti
tute of Mechanical Engineers and ASME, London, 1956.
21. Kowalcwski, J.: “ O n the Relations Between Fatigue Lives under Random Loading and under
Corresponding Program Loading.” in J. F. Plantem a el al. (eds.J. IC A F-AG A RD Symposium at
Amsterdam, I95S, Pergam on, New York, 1961.
22. Corten, H. J., and J. D olan: “ Cumulative Dam age Fatigue," Proceedings o f International
Conference on Fatigue o f Metals, British Institute of Mechanical Engineers and ASMF., London,
1956.
23. Argyris, J. H.. and S. Kelsey: Energy Therms and Structural Analysis, BuUerworth, London,
1960.
24. Przemieniecki, J. S.: Theory o f M atrix Structural Analysis, McGraw-Hill. New York, 1968.
RliFHRHNCHS 447
25. Tim oshenko, S. P., and Krieger Woinowsky: Theory o f Plates and Shells, McGraw-Hill, New
York, 1959.
26. Miner, M. A.: “ Cumulative Damage in Fatigue," Trans. A SM E , vol. 67, 1945, p. A-159.
27. Gere, J. M., and W. Weaver, Jr.: Analysis o f FrameJStructures, Van N ostrand, Princeton, N.J.,
1965.
28. Beaufait, Fred W., et al.: Computer M ethods o f Structural Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Englewood
Cliffs, N.J., 1970.
29. Rubinstein, M ashc F.: M atrix Computer Analysis o f Structures, Prcntice-Hail, Englewood Cliffs,
N .J., 1968.
30. Willems. N., and W. M. Lucas, Jr.: M atrix Analysis fo r Structural Engineers, Prentice-Hall,
Englewood ClilTs, N.J.. 1968.
31. K ardesluner, H .: Elementary M atrix Analysis o f Structures, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1971.
32. Meek, J. L.: M atrix Structural Analysis, M cGraw-Hill, New York, 1971.
33. H arrison, H. B.: Computer Methods in Structural Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,
1973.
34. Gallagher, R. H.: Finite Element Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N J . , 1975.
35. Shanley, F. R ., and li. 1. Ryder: “Stress Ratios," Aviat. Mag., June 1937.
36. Faupcl, J. H .: Engineering Design, Wiley, New York, 1964.
37. Shanley, F, R.: Mechanics o f Materials, M cGraw-Hill, New York, 1967-
38. Osgood, Carl C .: Fatigue Design, Tnterscience-Wiley, New York, 1970.
39. M arin, J.: Mechanical Behavior o f Engineering Materials, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N .J .,
.1962.
40. ASTM Standards, M ethods i f Testing Metals, American Society Tor Testing and Materials,
1962.
41. G erard. G .: Minimum Weight Analysis o f Compression Structures, N ew York University Press,
New York, 1956.
4 2. G e r a r d , G ., a r.d H . Ik -ck cr: H a n d b o o k o f Stru ctu ra l Stability, p t. 1: N A C A T c e h . N o te 3 7 8 3 ,
A u g u s t 1957.
43. Crandall, S. H .: Engineering Analysis, M cGraw-Hill, New York, 1956.
44. Williams, D.: Introduction to the Theory o f Aircraft Structures, E. Arnold, London, 1960.
45. Needham, R. A.: “ The Ultimate Strength of Aluminum Alloy Form ed Structural Shapes in
Com pression," 7 . Aeronaut. Sci., vol. 21, Apr. 1954.
46. Gerard, G., and H. Becker: Handbook o f Structural Stability, pt. 3: Ruckling of Curved Plates and
Shells, NACA Tech. N ote 3784, 1957.
47. G erard, G .: Handbook o f Structural Stability, pt. V, Compressive Strength of Flat Stiffened
Plates, NACA Tech. N ote 37S5, 1957.
48. Gerard, G., and H. Becker: Handbook o f Structural Stability, pt. 6 : Strength o f Thin W ing
Construction, NACA Tech. Note D-162, 1959.
49. Gerard, G .: “ The Crippling Strength or Compression Elements," J . Aeronaut. Sci., vol. 25, Jan.
1958.
50. Baldorf, S., M. Stein, and M. Schildcrout: Critical Shear Stress o f Curved Rectangular Panels,
NACA Tech. N ote 1348, 1947.
51. Kuhn, P., et al.: A Summary o f Diagonal Tension, pt. I, vol. 1, NACA Tech. N ote 2661, 1952.
52. Kuhn, P., and J. P. Peterson: Strength Analysis o f Stiffened Beam Webs, NACA Tech. N ote
1364, 1947.
53. Levy. S. , et al.: Analysis o f Square Shear W eb above Buckling Load, NACA Tech. N ote 962,
1945.
54. Levy, S., et al.: Analysis o f Deep Rectangular Shear Web above Buckling Load, NACA Tech.
N ote 1009, 1946.
55. Lahdc, R., and H. W agner, Test fo r the Determination o f the Stress Concentration in Tension
Fields, NACA Tech. Mem. 809, 1936.
56. Stowell, E. Z .: Compressive Strength o f Flanges, NACA Tech. N ote 2020, 1950.
57. Gatewood, B. F..: Thermal Stresses, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1957.
58. Nowacki, W.: Thermoelasticity, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1962.
4 4 8 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
59. Burgreen, David: Elements o f Thermal Stress Analysis, C. P. Press, Jam aica, N.Y., 1971.
60. Calcote, Lee R.: The Analysis o f Laminated Composite Structures, Van Nostrand, New York,
1969.
61. Plahtema. F. J.: Sandwich Construction. Wiley, New York, 1966.
62. Zicnkiewicz, O. C., and G. S. I lolister: Stress Analysis, Wiley, New York, 1965.
63. Argyris, J. H., and S. Dclscy: Modern Fuselage Analysis and the Elastic Aircraft, Buttenvorth,
London, 1963.
64. Gjiliagher, R. H.: A Correlation Study o f M ethods o f M atrix Structural Analysis, Pergamon, New
York, 1964.
65. HolT, N. J.: The Analysis n f Structures, Wiley, New York, 1960.
66. Kuhn, P.: Stresses in Aircraft arid Structures, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1956.
67. Langhaar, H. L.: Energy M ethods in Applied Mechanics, Wiley, New York, 1960.
68. Lee, C. W.: “ Thermoelastic Stresses in Thick-W alled Cylinders under Axial Tem perature Gradi
ent," J, AppL Mech., vol. 33, 1966, p. 467.
69. Jaeger, J. C.: “ O n Therm al Stresses in Circular Cylinders,” Phil. Mag., scr. 7, vol. 36, 1945,
p. 418.
70. Janak, J. F.: “ Therm al Expansion in a C onstrained Elastic Cylinder," IB M J. Res. Develop.,
May 1969.
71. Miller, R. E.: Theory o f the Nonhomogeneous Anisotropic Elastic Shells Subjected to Arbitrary
Temperature Distribution, University oflllinois Bulletin 458.
72. Sokolowski, M.: “ The Axially Symmetric Thermoelastic Problem of the Fnfmite Cylinder,”
Arch, Mech. Stos., vol. 10, 1958, p. 811.
73. Strub, R. A.: ‘‘ D istribution of Mechanical and Therm al Stresses in Multilayer Cylinders,”
A SM E Trans., Jan. 1953, p. 73.
74. Sun, C. T., and K. C. Valanis: “ On the Axially Symmetric Deformation of a Cylinder of Finite
Length,” Engineering Research Institute, Iowa Stale University Rep. 48, 1966.
75. Gallagher, R. H.: “ Com puterized Structural Analysis and Design—The Next Twenty Years,”
Computers and Structures, vol. 7. 1977, pp. 495-501.
76. Norris, C. H., J. B. W ilbur, and S. Utku: Elementary Structural Analysis, 3d ed., McGraw-Hill,
1976.
77. Livesley, R. K.: M atrix M ethods o f Structural Analysis, 2d cd.. Pergam on, New York, 1976.
78. Schmit, L. A. and B. Farshi: “ Minimum Weight Design of Stress Limited Trusses,” Proc. ASCE,
' J. Struct. D i v vol. 100, no. ST1, Jan. 1974, pp. 97-107.
79. Glockner, P. G .: “ Symmetry in Structural M echanics,” Proc. A SC E , J . Struct. Div.. vol. 99, no.
ST1, Jan. 1973, pp. 71-89.
80. Fox, L.: An Introduction lo Numerical Linear Algebra, Oxford University Press, New York,
1965.
81. Meyer, C.: “ Solution of Linear Equations—S tate of the A rt,” Proc A SC E , J. Struct. I)iv., vol.
99, no. ST7, July 1973, pp. 1507-1526.
82. Meyer, C.: “ Special Problems Related to Linear Equation Solvers,” Proc. ASCE, J. Struct. Div.,
vol. 101, no. ST4, Apr. 1975, pp. 869-890.
83. Hicks, J. G.: Welded Joint Design, Halsted Press, N.J., 1979.
84. Kirby, P. A., and D. A. N ethercot: Design fo r Structural Stability, Halsted, N.J., 1979.
85. Donnell, L. H.: Beams, Plates, and Shells, M cGraw -Hill, New York, 1976.
86. Jones, R. M.: Mechanics o f Composite Materials, M cGraw-Hill, New York, 1975.
87. Tauchert, T. R.: Energy Principles in Structural Mechanics, M cGraw-Hill, New York. 1974.
88. Zicnkiewicz, O. C.: The fin ite Element M ethod in Engineering Science, 3d ed., McGraw-Hill,
New York, 1977.
89. Brebbia, C. A., and J. J. C onnor: Fundamentals o f Finite Element Techniques fo r Structural
Engineers, Wiley, New York, 1974.
90. Brick, R. M.: Structure and Properties o f Engineering Materials, 4th cd., McGraw-Hill, New
York, 1977.
91. Brush, D. O., and B. O. A lm m th: Duckling o f Bars, Plates and Shells, McGraw-Hill, New York,
1975.
92. Rockey, K. C.: T he Finite Element M ethod: A Basic Introduction, Wiley, New York, 1975.
Rlii-'liRHNCES 4 49
93. Brooks, C. R.: flea t Treatment o f Ferrous Alloys, McGnnv-Mill, New York, 1979.
94. Cherepanov, G. P.: Mechanics o f Brittle Fracturc, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1979.
95. Cordon, W. A.: Properties, Evaluation, Control o f Engineering Materials, McGraw-Hill, New
York, 1979.
96. Dieter, G. E.: Mechanical Metalluniv, 2d ed., M cGraw-Hill, New York, 1976.
97. Palmer, A. C.: Structural Mechanics, Clarendon Press, Oxford. 1976.
98. Burgreen, A. C : Design Methods for Power Plant Structures, 1st ed., C. P. Press, Jamaica, N.Y..
1975.
99. Fertis, D. G .: Dynamics ami Vibration o f Structures, Wiley, New York, 1973.
100. Lyon, R. H.: Smnsncct/ Em’rtjy /imifysis o f Dyntwn'cof Sysit’ms; Theory am/ M.l.T.
Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1975.
101. Clough, R. W.: Dynamics n f Structures, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1975.
102. Budynas, R. G .: Advanced Strength and Applied Stress Analysis, Rochester Inst, of Technology,
Rochester, N.Y., 1977.
103. Shames, I. H.: Introduction to Solid Mechanics. Prcnticc-Hall, Knglewood ClifTs, N.J., 1975.
104. Harrison, H. B.: Structural Analysis and Design: Some Minicomputer Applications, Pergamon,
New York, 1979.
INDEX
450
I N D E X 4 51
C astigliano's first theorem . 144 Diagonal web tension, angle of, 3 7 7 —380
Castigliano’s second theorem . 146 D im ensionless colum n curves for com parison
use in deflection analysis o f structures. of m aterials, 3 4 2 —344
1 5 0 -1 5 6 Displacem ent boundary conditions, 70
C entroids, 4 0 9 —411 D isplacem ents, sign convention for, 194
Cholcski m ethod. 441 Distributed loads. 2
C ircular shafts, torsion of, 310 —311 D istributive law for m atrix m ultiplication, 439
C'loscd-scction box beams: Dolan. J. J.. 86
shear now in, 11 3 —118 Drag, 31, 32
torsion of, 112— 113 Dunn, L. G ., 365
Colum n end fixity. 334 —339 D ynam ic loads. 2
Column failures, local crippling, 358 —362
Colum n mall ices. 435
Colum n yield stre ss. 339 Eccentrically loaded colum ns, buckling of,
C olum ns (see E ccentrically Joaded colum ns. 3 3 1 -3 3 2
buckling of: Long colum ns, buckling of; Eccentrically loaded connections, 4 0 1 —404
Short colum ns) Elastic axes o f wings, 2 6 3 —266
Com bined stresses. 320 —325 Elastic buckling o f curved rectangular plates,
M o h r's circle for, 4 2 9 —433 3 7 0 -3 7 3
Com m utative law for m atrix multiplication. E lastic limit, torsional stresses above,
440 3 1 7 -3 2 0
Com parison of sim ilar m aterials, dimensionless Elastic m odulus or elasticity, 148
colum n cu rv es for. 342 — 344 Elastic nonlinear behavior, 71, 72
C om patibility equations for therm al stresses. Elastic shear buckling o f flat plates, 368 —370
283. 284 —285 Elasticity of structures, 6 2 —77
C om plem entary strain energies and strain. 14(1 lllcment discretization, 191
Com plem entary w ork and w ork. 140 Elem ent form ulations, transform ations of, to
Com pression: system form ulation, 21 1—214
o f curvcd sheets, 364 —3(>H Element shape functions. 207 —209
o f isotropic flat plates, buckling, 344 - 3-19 polynomial m ethods, 207 —209
C om pression tests, Si Elem ent stiffness m atrices, 2 0 9 —2 1 1
C om pressive strength o f isotropic flat sheet. Element structural relationships:
3 4 9 -3 5 3 form ulation procedures, 202 —203
C oncentrated loads. 2 direct m ethod, 203 —205
C onstant bending stresses, 302 —304 energy m ethods, 2 0 5 —207
C onversion facto rs. S i/m etric, inside front End restraint of torsion mem bers, 316 —317
cover Engesser equation, 333 —334
C oordinate system . 192, 194 Equilibrium conditions for thermal stresses,
C orten. H. J.. 86 281, 2 S 4 - 2 8 5
C ozzone. F. P., 304. 305. 343. 357 Equivalent load solution for thermal stress
Crippling stresses: problems, 286 —289
o f colum ns, 358 —362 Euler, L., 331
G erard m ethod for calculating. 362 —363 Euler column, 365
N eedham m ethod for calculating. 362 —363 E uler curve, 339. 340
Curved beam s, bending stresses in. 307 —310 liulcr equation. 331. 3 3 9 - 3 4 2 . 345, 353
Curved rectangular plates, elastic buckling of, Euler load, 3 3 1, 332
3 7 0 -3 7 3
Curved sheets:
buckling of. 364 —368 F actor o f safety, 27
com pression of, 364 —368 Failure theories in structural design,
C utouts in sem im onocoque structures. 3 2 5 -3 2 7
2 5 1 -2 6 0 I-'atigue. 84 —89
Fatigue failure, 84
Fatigue-life prediction, 84 —87
Deflection analysis o f structural svstems. Fatigue tests, 5-iV curves, 85, 87 —89
1 3 9 -1 8 6 Finite difference m ethod, 158—165
Design loads. 27 Finite elem ent m atrix m ethods, applications of,
D eterm inants. 4 36 —437 192
properties of, 437 —438 Finite element stiffness m ethod, 190 —226
Diagonal m atrices, 435 First central difference approxim ation, 159
452 I N D E X