PCGT Petition

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

suresh 904-PIL-20.2012.

doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY


CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.20 OF 2012

Public Concern for Governance Trust .... Petitioner


Vs.
State of Maharashtra .... Respondent

Mr. Jamshed Mistry with Mr. Dipesh Siroya for


the Petitioner.
Mr. P.P. Kakade, GP, with Mr. B.V. Samant, AGP,
for the Respondent-State.

CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI &


R.I. CHAGLA, JJ.
DATE : DECEMBER 03, 2019

P.C:

1. The petitioner has filed this PIL so as to seek an


effective enforcement and implementation of The Right to
Information Act, 2005 (“RTI Act, 2005”).

2. From time to time certain orders were passed in this


PIL to ensure that this enactment does not become a dead
letter.

3. The enactment is in larger public interest. It is not as


if the right to information is a right derived by the citizens from
the RTI Act, 2005. Be it known to everybody that right to
information is implicit and inbuilt in the right and freedom

Page 1 of 3
suresh 904-PIL-20.2012.doc
guaranteed to a citizen under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution
of India. The right to free speech and expression includes within
it the right to obtain information. That is how this constitutionally
recognised and permitted right is made meaningful and its
enforcement is now serving a larger public purpose. It is only
the enforcement machinery which is created by the RTI Act,
2005.

4. Now because the information has to be provided


and the denial is only in exceptional cases, that the State
suddenly finds itself in a fix for thousands of applications are
received day in and day out by not only the State Government
but all such entities and agencies discharging the obligations
and functions of the State. It is, therefore, clear that the local
bodies and all those authorities having the trapping of a State
are covered by the law. As far as the State Government is
concerned, it was handicapped for want of staff. On account of
this PIL and certain directions by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of
India, Now the Recruitment Rules have been framed. Though
the Recruitment Rules are of 2018, the affidavit filed today
assures us that the State Government will duly abide by these
Rules and fill up the posts or vacancies arising from time to
time.

5. The affidavit informs us that the process is ongoing

Page 2 of 3
suresh 904-PIL-20.2012.doc
and merely because there are vacancies, the State
Government or the machinery will not deny information to the
members of the public if that is otherwise to be made available.
In other words, save and except the exceptions carved out by
the law, the information will be provided and in a timely and
orderly manner. For that purpose, staff will be recruited and
today the position, as recorded in para 14 of this affidavit, is
that out of the sanctioned posts (138 in number), 124 have
been filled in and 14 are vacant.

6. As far as these vacant posts are concerned,


Mr. Samant assures that the process will be initiated in terms of
the Recruitment Rules and duly completed.

7. For that purpose, we place this matter on


14-1-2020. We hope and trust that by that time further progress
will be made.

(R.I. CHAGLA, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)

Digitally
signed by
SURESH
SURESH JAGDISH
JAGDISH SAJNAWAT
SAJNAWAT Date:
2019.12.05
12:18:52
+0530

Page 3 of 3

You might also like