Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 42 views

    The Judicial System (Pre-Spanish)

    Uploaded by

    Jude Lein
    Indigenous Filipinos had their own legal system prior to Spanish colonization, with orally transmitted laws and some written codes by local leaders. Each barangay, comprising 30-100 families, was governed by a datu who served as executive, legislature, and judge. The datu would hear disputes and trials were held publicly, with the accused and accuser presenting their own cases and witnesses providing testimony under oath. When uncertainty remained, trials by ordeal were utilized, as it was believed the gods would protect the innocent through these trials.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    The Judicial System (Pre-Spanish)

    Uploaded by

    Jude Lein
    42 views1 page
    Indigenous Filipinos had their own legal system prior to Spanish colonization, with orally transmitted laws and some written codes by local leaders. Each barangay, comprising 30-100 families, was governed by a datu who served as executive, legislature, and judge. The datu would hear disputes and trials were held publicly, with the accused and accuser presenting their own cases and witnesses providing testimony under oath. When uncertainty remained, trials by ordeal were utilized, as it was believed the gods would protect the innocent through these trials.

    Original Description:

    The Judicial System(Pre-Spanish)

    Original Title

    The Judicial System(Pre-Spanish)

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Indigenous Filipinos had their own legal system prior to Spanish colonization, with orally transmitted laws and some written codes by local leaders. Each barangay, comprising 30-100 families, was governed by a datu who served as executive, legislature, and judge. The datu would hear disputes and trials were held publicly, with the accused and accuser presenting their own cases and witnesses providing testimony under oath. When uncertainty remained, trials by ordeal were utilized, as it was believed the gods would protect the innocent through these trials.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    42 views1 page

    The Judicial System (Pre-Spanish)

    Uploaded by

    Jude Lein
    Indigenous Filipinos had their own legal system prior to Spanish colonization, with orally transmitted laws and some written codes by local leaders. Each barangay, comprising 30-100 families, was governed by a datu who served as executive, legislature, and judge. The datu would hear disputes and trials were held publicly, with the accused and accuser presenting their own cases and witnesses providing testimony under oath. When uncertainty remained, trials by ordeal were utilized, as it was believed the gods would protect the innocent through these trials.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    The Judicial System of the Pre-Spanish Filipinos

    Indigenous Filipinos had their own laws and justice system even before the arrival of Spaniards
    in 1521. These laws were believed to be God-given and were orally transmitted from
    generation to generation. There were some written laws which were promulgated by the
    datus such as the Code of Maragtas and the Code of Kalantiaw

    Philippines were composed of independent barangays, a settlement of about 30 to 100 families. .


    Each barangay was governed by a local chief or datu, who had the function and power of an
    executive, legislative and judiciary.

    In the exercise of his judicial authority, the datu acted as a judge (hukom) in settling
    disputes and deciding cases in his barangay. A group of elders, who devoted time to the
    study of the customs, usages and traditions of their tribes, sits as a jury.

    Trials were held publicly and decisions were rendered promptly. The accused and the
    accuser faced each other to plead their own case with their respective witnesses. Before
    testifying, these witnesses took an oath to tell the truth and nothing but the truth.
    When the court was in doubt as to whom of the litigants were really guilty, it resorted
    to trial by ordeal. This is especially true in criminal cases. It was believed that the gods
    protected the innocent and punished the guilty and that ordeals revealed divine truth to
    the people. An accused person who was innocent was believed to be always successful
    in the ordeals because the gods made him so.

    You might also like