Directions: Read The Passage. Then Answer The Questions Below
Directions: Read The Passage. Then Answer The Questions Below
Directions: Read The Passage. Then Answer The Questions Below
abnormalities in social interaction, behavior, interests, and communication. The five forms
Rett syndrome, and Childhood Disintegrative Disorder. Although the number of reported
cases of ASD has experienced a dramatic increase in the past 25 years, the majority of
doctors agree that this increase is due to changes in diagnostic practices and advances in
medical professionals about the underlying causes of ASD, theories range from genetic
emerged in recent times is the hypothesis that ASD could be caused by the MMR vaccine,
which is an immunization against measles, mumps, and rubella that was first developed in
the 1960’s. The vaccine is a mixture of three live viruses and is administered via injection
to children when they are one year old. By the late 1990’s, this vaccination had led to the
a combination of spurious scientific data and alarmist media attention led to an entirely
The first claims of a connection between the MMR vaccine and autism were made in 1998,
when an article in The Lancet, a respected British medical journal, reported on eight cases
of autism that could possibly be traced back to the administration of an MMR vaccine. The
parents of the children in this study contended that the symptoms of autism in their
Wakefield, one of the authors of the article, called on British doctors to stop giving
combined MMR vaccines, instead advocating for individual inoculations against measles,
Following the publication of this article, Wakefield published several follow-up papers that
further questioned the safety of the MMR vaccine. An onslaught of media coverage then
began. Parents appeared on television sharing anecdotal evidence linking their child’s
inoculation to the onset of ASD. The popular press quickly seized upon this story; in 2002,
over 1200 articles were written about the link between MMR vaccines and ASD. Less than
Since the initial panic, fears that MMR vaccines cause ASD have generally subsided. A
survey completed in 2004 showed that only 2% of people in the United Kingdom thought
that there was a legitimate link between MMR vaccines and ASD. Fears were most likely
allayed when, in 2004, an investigative reporter discovered that Andrew Wakefield had
received a large sum of money from lawyers seeking evidence to use in cases against
vaccine manufacturers. It was then discovered that Wakefield had applied for patents on
an alternate MMR vaccine. These severe conflicts of interest damaged the credibility of
Wakefield’s study beyond repair. In 2010, Wakefield was tried by Britain’s General Medical
Council under allegations that he had falsified data and manipulated test results. The
Council found that Wakefield had acted “dishonestly and irresponsibly,” and consequently
The anti-MMR vaccine panic that arose immediately after Wakefield’s article was
published had a significant negative effect on the health of thousands of children. Once the
controversy began, the number of parents in the United Kingdom who inoculated their
children with the MMR vaccine experienced a sharp decline. Not surprisingly, the number
of reported cases of measles increased; while there were only 56 confirmed cases of
measles in the UK in 1998; in 2008 there were over 1300. Between 2002 and 2008, there
were outbreaks of measles throughout Europe and North America. These outbreaks cost
millions of dollars in health care and resulted in the deaths of dozens of children and adults
Who is to blame for these deaths? It is easy to hold Andrew Wakefield accountable, but
the media must also bear some of the responsibility. The media’s appetite for a
sensational medical story overshadowed the fact that there was very little scientific
evidence behind Wakefield’s claim. Although Wakefield is certainly not the first person to
publish fraudulent scientific findings in a respected medical journal, the magnitude of this
event was anomalous, as most medical hoaxes are discredited before they can reach the
popular media. While The Lancet should not have published Wakefield’s article without
checking it thoroughly, the popular media should not have blown the study out of
Questions
1) The primary purpose of the passage is to
A. warn parents about the dangers of not vaccinating their children against measles
B. criticize The Lancet for publishing Wakefield’s article without vetting it more thoroughly
C. provide an overview of the MMR vaccine controversy, including its consequences and
responsible parties
D. inform readers about the history of the MMR vaccine, especially in the U.S. and the UK
E. blame parents who believed alarmist media reports for the measles outbreaks
A. reassuring
B. safe
C. clear
D. necessary
E. legitimate
3) Which of the following statements most accurately summarizes the author’s explanation for the
increase in reported cases of ASD over the past 25 years?
A. Over the past 25 years, parents have been more likely to have their young children inoculated
against MMR.
B. Since the results of Wakefield’s study were published, parents have been less likely to have their
young children inoculated against MMR.
C. In the past 25 years, doctors have developed a better understanding of genetics, which is
thought to be the leading factor in whether or not a child will develop ASD.
D. The drastic changes in our environment that have occurred over the past 25 years have most
significantly contributed to an increase in cases of ASD.
E. The increase in reported cases of ASD is mainly the result of an increased understanding of how
to recognize ASD.
4) Which of the following pieces of evidence from paragraphs 2 and 3 support(s) the author’s claim
that popular media is partially responsible for creating unnecessary panic?
I. “An article published in The Lancet, a respected British medical journal, reported on eight cases
of autism that could possibly be traced back to the administration of an MMR vaccine.”
II. “In 2002, over 1200 articles were written about the link between MMR vaccines and ASD. Less
than 30% of these articles mentioned that an overwhelming amount of scientific evidence
suggested that these vaccinations were completely safe.”
III. “Parents appeared on television sharing anecdotal evidence regarding the links between their
child’s inoculation and the onset of ASD.”
A. l only
B. II only
C. I and II only
D. II and III only
E. I, II, and III
5) In paragraph 4, the author cites all of the following as ways that Wakefield’s study was
discredited except
A. investigators discovered that the parents of children in Wakefield’s study were litigants in a
lawsuit against the pharmaceutical company that made the MMR vaccine
B. The Lancet eventually retracted Wakefield’s original article
C. it was discovered that Wakefield accepted money from lawyers who were filing a suit against the
pharmaceutical companies responsible for making the MMR vaccine
D. an investigation into Wakefield’s research found that he had falsified data in his initial study
E. Wakefield himself had apparently been working on an alternate vaccine to compete with MMR
6) Based on its use in paragraph 4, it can be inferred that the phrase “conflicts of interest” means
situations in which people
A. timely
B. calamitous
C. abnormal
D. unacceptable
E. coincidental
8) Which of the following pieces of evidence, if true, would best strengthen the author’s argument in
paragraph 6?
A. An estimated 1.4 million measles deaths are averted each year due to MMR immunization.
B. 90% of parents in the UK who decided not to immunize their children against measles reported
that they did so against their doctors’ wishes.
C. Measles outbreaks in Japan can be traced back to Japanese exchange students who were
studying in the UK.
D. In the United States, over 60% of children who are not immunized against MMR never exhibit
any symptoms of the measles.
E. Andrew Wakefield sued the investigative reporter who accused him of fraud.