TRAINING SESSION EVALUATION FORM

INSTRUCTIONS:
This post-training evaluation instrument is intended to measure how
satisfactorily your trainer has done his job during the whole duration of your
training. Please give your honest rating by checking on the corresponding cell of
your response. Your answers will be treated with utmost confidentiality.
Legend: 5 - Outstanding
4 - Very Good/ Very Satisfactory
3 - Good/ Adequate
2 - Fair/ Satisfactory
1 – Poor/Unsatisfactory
*Examples from Hypothetical Data
Trainee# 1
TRAINERS/INSTRUCTORS
5 4 3 2 1
Name of Trainer: NIMFA CIELO V. TORIBIO
1. Orients trainees about CBT, the use of CBLM and the
evaluation system
√

2. Discusses clearly the unit of competencies and

√
outcomes to be attained at the start of every module
3. Exhibits mastery of the subject/course he/she is
√
teaching
4. Motivates and elicits active participation from
√
students or trainees
5. Keeps records of evidence/s of competency attainment
√
of each student/ trainees
6. Instill value of safety and orderliness in the
√
classrooms and workshops
7. Instills the value of teamwork and positive work
√
values
8. Instills good grooming and hygiene. √
9. Instills value of time √
10. Quality of voice while teaching √
11. Clarity of language/dialect used in teaching √
12. Provides extra attention to trainees and students with
√
specific learning needs
13. Attends work-based training regularly and promptly √
14. Shows energy and enthusiasm while teaching √
15. Maximize use of training supplies and materials √
16. Dresses appropriately √
17. Shows empathy √
 18. Demonstrates self-control √
This post training evaluation instrument is intended to measure how
satisfactorily your trainer prepared and facilitated your training. Please give your
honest rating by checking on the corresponding cell of your response. Your
answer will be treated with utmost confidentiality.
Use the following rating scales:
5- Outstanding
4- Very Good/Very Satisfactory
3- Good/Adequate
2- Fair/Satisfactory
1- Poor/Unsatisfactory
Trainee # 1
PREPARATION 1 2 3 4 5

 Workshop layout conforms with the components 

of a CBT workshop

 Number of CBLM is sufficient 

 Objectives of every training session is well
explained  
 Expected activities/outputs are clarified 
DESIGN AND DELIVERY 1 2 3 4 5
1. Course contents are sufficient to attain
objectives 
2. CBLM are logically organized and presented 
3. Information Sheet are comprehensive in
providing the required knowledge 
4. Examples, illustrations and demonstrations help
you learn 
5. Practice exercises like Task/Job Sheets are
sufficient to learn required skills 
6. Valuable knowledge are learned through the
contents of the course 
7. Training Methodologies are effective 
8. Assessment Methods and evaluation system are
suitable for the trainees and the competency 
9. Recording of achievements and competencies
acquired is prompt and comprehensive 
 10. Feedback about the performance of
learners are given immediately 
TRAINING FACILITIES/RESOURCES 1 2 3 4 5
1. Training Resources are adequate 
2. Training Venue is conducive and appropriate 
3. Equipment, Supplies and Materials are sufficient 
4. Equipment, Supplies and Materials are suitable
and appropriate 
5. Promptness in providing supplies and materials 
SUPPORT STAFF
1. Support staff are accommodating 

Comments/Suggestions:
Access to relevant workplace or appropriately simulated
environment where assessment can take place. Materials relevant
to the proposed activity or tasks
 1. Self-Evaluation

During the session, did I? Yes No

1. Establish an atmosphere of trust? 
2. Encourage participation of the trainees? 
3. Assist the trainees when they needed 
assistance?
4. Consider the feedback of trainees? 
5. Remain aware of non-verbal 
communication?
6. Praise effort? 
7. Summarize key points? 
8. Vary activities and tasks to aid attainment of 
competency?
9. Provide opportunities for practice? 
10. Achieve the learning objectives 
 SUPERVISED INDUSTRY TRAINING OR ON THE JOB
TRAINING EVALUATION FORM

Dear Trainees:
The following questionnaire is designed to evaluate the effectiveness of the
Supervised Industry Training (SIT) or On the Job Training (OJT) you had with the
Industry Partners of SICAT. Please check (/) the appropriate box corresponding
to your rating for each question asked. The results of this evaluation shall serve
as basis for improving the design and management of the SIT in SICAT to
maximize the benefits of the said Program. Thank you for your cooperation.
Legend:
5 - Outstanding
4 - Very Good/ Very Satisfactory
3 - Good/ Adequate
2 - Fair/ Satisfactory
1 – Poor/Unsatisfactory
Trainee # 1
Item Questions Ratings
No.
INSTITUTIONAL EVALUATION 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Has SICAT conducted an
orientation about the SIT/OJT
1 
program, the requirements and
preparations needed and
expectations?
Has SICAT provided necessary
assistance such as referrals or
2 
recommendations in finding the
company for your OJT?
Has SICAT showed coordination
with the Industry partner in the
3 
design and supervision of your
SIT/OJT?
Has your in-school training
4 adequate to undertake 
Industry?
Has SICAT monitored your
progress in the Industry? 
5

6 Has the supervision been

effective in achieving your OJT

 objectives and providing
feedbacks when necessary?
Did SICAT conduct assessment
7 of your SIT/OJT program upon 
completion?
Where you provided with the
8 results of the Industry and 
SICAT assessment of your OJT?
Comments/Suggestions:
 Average Ratings
Item Questions Average
No.
INSTITUTIONAL EVALUATION
Has SICAT conducted an orientation about the SIT/OJT 5
program, the requirements and preparations needed and
1
expectations?
Has SICAT provided necessary assistance such as 5
referrals or recommendations in finding the company for
2
your OJT?
Has SICAT showed coordination with the Industry 5
partner in the design and supervision of your SIT/OJT?
3
Has your in-school training adequate to undertake 5
Industry?
4
Has SICAT monitored your progress in the Industry? 5
5
Has the supervision been effective in achieving your OJT 5
objectives and providing feedbacks when necessary?
6
Did SICAT conduct assessment of your SIT/OJT program 5
upon completion?
7
Where you provided with the results of the Industry and 5
SICAT assessment of your OJT?
8
General Average 5
Outstanding
Range: 0.00- 1.49 =Poor/Unsatisfactory
1.50- 2.49 =Fair/Adequate
2.50- 3.49 =Good/Satisfactory
3.50- 4.49 =Very Good/Very Satisfactory
4.50- 5.00 =Outstanding
General Interpretation:
____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
Recommendation:
Providing high-quality On-the-Job training industry. Providing time
for consultation with students for informal and friendly advising. Being
open to critiques of one’s own teaching.
Trainee # 1
Ite
m Question Ratings
No.
INDUSTRY PARTNER 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Was the Industry partner
1 appropriate for your type of training 
required and/or desired?
Has the industry partner designed
2 the training to meet your objectives 
and expectations?
Has the industry partner showed
coordination with SICAT in the
3
design and supervision of the

SIT/OJT?
Has the Industry Partner and its staff
4 welcomed you and treated you with 
respect and understanding?
Has the industry partner facilitated
the training, including the provision
5 of the necessary resources such as 
facilities and equipment needed to
achieve your OJT objectives?
Has the Industry Partner assigned a
6 supervisor to oversee your work or 
training?
Was the supervisor effective in
7 supervising you through regular 
meetings, consultations and advise?
Has the training provided you with
the necessary technical and
8
administrative exposure of real world

problems and practices?
Has the training program allowed
you to develop self-confidence, self-
9
motivation and positive attitude

towards work?
Has the experience improved your
10
personal skills and human relations?

11 Are you satisfied with your training
in the Industry?

 Comments/Suggestions:

Signature: ______________________________
Printed Name: SUNSHINE CRUZ Qualification:
(DRESSMAKING NC II)

Host Industry Partner: LAMUG’S DRESS SHOP

Supervisor: LILIA LAMUG

Period of Training: NOV. 2-DEC. 2, 2019 Instructor:

(NIMFA CIELO V. TORIBIO)
 Average Ratings
Item
Question Average
No.
INDUSTRY PARTNER
Was the Industry partner appropriate for your type of training
1
required and/or desired? 5
Has the industry partner designed the training to meet your
2 objectives and expectations? 5
Has the industry partner showed coordination with SICAT in
3
the design and supervision of the SIT/OJT? 5
Has the Industry Partner and its staff welcomed you and treated
4
you with respect and understanding? 5
Has the industry partner facilitated the training, including the
5 provision of the necessary resources such as facilities and
equipment needed to achieve your OJT objectives? 5
Has the Industry Partner assigned a supervisor to oversee your
6 work or training? 5
Was the supervisor effective in supervising you through regular
7 meetings, consultations and advise? 5
Has the training provided you with the necessary technical and
8 administrative exposure of real world problems and practices? 5
Has the training program allowed you to develop self-confidence,
9
self-motivation and positive attitude towards work? 5
Has the experience improved your personal skills and human
10
relations? 5
11 Are you satisfied with your training in the Industry? 5
General Average 5
Outstanding
Range: 0.00- 1.49 =Poor/Unsatisfactory
1.50- 2.49 =Fair/Adequate
2.50- 3.49 =Good/Satisfactory
3.50- 4.49 =Very Good/Very Satisfactory
4.50- 5.00 =Outstanding

General Interpretation:
____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
Recommendation:
Lamug’s Dress Shop helps OJT students in preparing for work in the
future.
_____________________________________________________________