Elements of Mechanical Design: SYEN4399. FIRST in Engineering
Elements of Mechanical Design: SYEN4399. FIRST in Engineering
Elements of Mechanical Design: SYEN4399. FIRST in Engineering
Over the past several centuries, many specific elements have evolved, which cover the majority of the situations
which occur in mechanical design.
These elements are grouped in categories, most of which are listed in Machinery’s Handbook.
• Fasteners
• Gears and Sprockets
• Bearings and Bushings
• Shaft Couplings
• Brakes and Clutches
• Actuators (motors, solenoids, pneumatics, and hydraulics)
• Sensors
This list may not (yet) be exhaustive. However, it provides 90% coverage.
If you master all of these elements, you know everything you need to know to be a mechanical designer. (That’s a
little sarcasm, but you will be on your way.)
A task related to power transmission is timing. In the internal combustion engine, fuel and air delivery to the pis-
ton cylinder and the spark had to be timed mechanically. A timing belt or chain was used for this purpose.
In modern systems, sensors usually determine the timed information. However, sometimes these sensors must be
mechanically coupled to the driving source, usually through the same mechanical mechanisms of days gone by.
In power transmission, the forces are larger than in timing, and the methods for shaft coupling require more
robust design techniques.
Timing requires greater accuracy. This usually translates into less back-lash and more expensive components.
• Gears
• Belts and Pulleys
• Sprocket and Chain
• Timing Belt and Gears
• Power distribution belts in an automobile (e.g. the belt that drives the A/C, water pump, etc.)
• Lift-o-matic I on the Phoenix
• Lift-o-matic II on Buford (the removed version)
• Wall-crawler on Johnny #5
Belt slip determines the maximum power transmission. V-belts alleviate this problem by increasing the effective
surface area over which contact is maintained.
Belt and pulley must be pretensioned. This adds to bearing loads in a system. Remember the difficulty with the
Lift-o-matic II on Buford.
Belts wear over time and must be replaced. Improvements in belt technology and automatic tensioners have
reduced this problem.
Although machinery handbook gives design tables and equations for belt calculations, the designer should always
refer to manufacturer design information where it exists.
Consider two pulleys driven by a belt. The first pulley has radius r 1 and the second pulley has a different radius,
r 2 . Let us perform some rudimentary analysis on this system.
Assume the first pulley turns through an angle, θ 1 . The belt moves through an arc length, s1 = r 1 θ 1 . The second
pulley must move through this same length, assuming the belt does not bunch or slip. Hence, s 1 = r 2 θ 2 and
r1 θ1 = r2 θ2 .
·
· · θ1 r2
Differentiating this equation yields r 1 θ 1 = r 2 θ 2 which may be rearranged to determine the gear ratio, ----
· - = -.
---
r1
θ2
In words, the ratio of output speed to input speed is the inverse ratio of the pulley radii.
This provides a powerful tool for matching conditions. If the driving torque is fixed, any set of pulleys can be
devised which give an output speed in any range desired.
lin
eo
fa
The gear tooth form is created by an involute curve. Pretend that a string is rolled up on a cyl-
ct
ion
inder whose diameter is called the base diameter. As the string is unrolled (while remaining φ
taught) it traces out a curve in space, called the involute curve. This curve forms the tooth
form.
If two cylinders of different diameters were to maintain string contact while the string were
unwinding on one circle and winding onto the other, the rate of winding/unwinding would be
uniform and not depend on center distance. base circle
The involute function is inv ( α ) = tan ( α ) – α , where α is the angle through which the string is unwrapped.
As α is varied, the line traces out the tooth form. When α reaches the pitch circle, it takes on the value of the pres-
sure angle, φ . The pressure angle is defined as the angle between the lin-of-action and a perpendicular to the line
of centers.
The equation relating pressure angle and base circle diameter is D b = D cos φ where D is the pitch diameter.
The pitch diameter relates the number of teeth on a gear and the diametral pitch.
–1
P d = ( 25.4mm/inch ) ( m ) . (1)
Forces between gear teeth will be directed along the pressure angle. In a well designed gear, the force will be
mostly perpendicular to the gear tooth face. This means that most of the force will be directed towards turning the
gear and little will be pushing against the bearing support.
1
Pressure angles for readily available gears (English or metric) are usually quantized into the following bins, 14 --2- ° ,
20° , 25° . Custom pressure angles can be made. However, this is done at the expense of much design time and
1
design of tooling. Although it is still readily available, 14 --2- ° is being phased out and should not be used unless abso-
lutely necessary.
The larger the pressure angle, the thicker the tooth and the more normal the force. This results in a lessening of
the unused force and strenthens the tooth at the same time.
The only down-side is that the fewest number of teeth available on a gear is larger than for a smaller pressure
angle.
1
As an example, the original teeth on Johnny #5’s drive system were 14 --2- ° , and the pitting wear on the teeth was
excessive.
SYEN4399. FIRST in Engineering 7
Gear Train Calculations
The classic spur gear train involves two geometric rules.
1. Gears which share a common shaft have the same rotational speed.
· D in Z in
θ out ---------- = – ---------
-
2. Meshing gears have the speed ratio --------
· - = – D out Z out , where D is the pitch diameter and Z is the number
θ in
of teeth on a gear. This formula comes from the same geometric consideration as two pulleys.
The normal use is to have smaller gears mesh with larger gears. A large gear and a small gear at a middle stage
will share a shaft.
· Z 2 Z in
θ out ---------
- ------- , where Z and Z share a common shaft.
Hence, for a two stage gear train --------
· - =
Z out Z1 1 2
θ in
Note the negative sign in these formulas. It indicates that direction is reversed for each gear stage. This is a differ-
ence from pulleys, where the direction remains the same.
Thus, a static analysis will be fairly accurate under all circumstances. In fact, the
tolerances in materials will affect the calculations more than accelerations.
• forces tangent to the pitch circle, which transmit motion from one gear to the next
• normal forces, which serve no useful purpose, but occur because the pressure angle is not “perfect”
Consider the free body diagram of the gears and note the implied direction of W t .
B 1x = W t , B 1y = – W n , B 2x = – W t , B 2y = W n (1)
τ M + τ B1 – r 1 W t = 0 , τ G2 + τ B2 + r 2 W t = 0 . (2)
Unless you prepare a model for bearing torques (ie as a function of angular speed or bearing forces) it is best to
neglect them in the analysis and develop an experiential model for the friction. Hence,
τ G2 r Z
-------- = – ---2- = – -----2- . (3)
τM r1 Z1
For spur gears, I normally use a fudge factor of 0.9. For planetary gears, 0.8. And for worm gears, 0.7 to account
for friction at the bearings. This might also be a function of the actual bearings.
τM Z2
- = ( – f ) -----
------- - (4)
τ G2 Z1
τM
W t = ------
r1
(1)
Since this force will be used in failure calculations, by neglecting the friction torque, this force will be larger than
the actual force. However, this is erring in the direction of conservatism for failure criteria and is a good thing.
Because the force acts along the pressure line, the horizontal component of the force is:
W n = W t tan φ (2)
It is often useful to treat gears through the power that they transmit. This occurs because power encapsulates both
the torque and the velocity.
Consider the work rate done at the point of contact. This is the force acting at that point multiplied by the velocity
of the point. This is actually a dot product and, since the entire velocity is tangentially directed at the circumfer-
ence of a circle, only the tangential force enters into the equation:
P = Wt vt = Wt r1 ω 1 = W t r2 ω2 = τM ω1 . (3)
ω ω
Noting that, for DC motors, τM = T stall 1 – ----------------
- , the power at the first stage is P = T stall ω 1 1 – ----------------
1
- .
ω no load ω no load
In most cases, either the internal gear will be pinned to avoid rotation or the center of the pinion will be pinned to
avoid rotation.
In the first case, the pinion’s axis will rotate. In the second case, the internal gear will rotate about its axis.
s D +DP s Z +Z P m(Z + Z )
s P
Also, D = r s + r P = ------------------
- = -----------------
- = ---------------------------
-
2 2P d 2
I P s P Z –Z Z +Z
This yields the first constraint on planetary gear teeth, ----------------- = -----------------
-
2P d 2P d
Z I = Z s + 2Z P
·
Assuming the sun gear is being driven at a rate θ s (i.e. counter-
·
Z s θs
clockwise), the pitch velocity is v s = ----------
-
2P d û t .
˜ ut
ur
The velocity of the point of contact between the ring gear and
·
ZI θI
the planet gear is : v I = ----------
2P d û t .
˜
Since the planet gear is both revolving around a center and rotating, determining its surface velocities is not as
p (Z + Z )
s
easy. The position of the center of the planet is r p = ----------------------
2P
- û , where û is the unit vector directed from the center
r r
˜ d
·
of the sun to the center of the moving planet. This unit vector rotates with angular velocity θ p k̂ , where k̂ points out
p (Z + Z ) · s
- θ p û t , where û is the unit vector in the direction of travel.
of the page. The velocity of the center is v p = ----------------------
˜ 2P d
t
The relative velocity of the point of contact of the planet in contact with the sun is vp
Zp · · ˜
v s/p = – --------
- θ s/p û t where θ s/p is the angular velocity of the planet gear about its axis.
˜ 2P d
·
θ s/p
Zp · v I/p
The relative velocity of the planet point of contact with the ring gear is vI/p = --------
- θ s/p û t . ˜
˜ 2P d Planet Gear
The velocity of the point of contact is the same for the sun gear and the planet gear:
·
Zs θs ( Zp + Z s ) · Zp · · · ·
v s = ---------- - θ p ût – --------
- û = ---------------------- - θ s/p û t or Z θ = ( Z + Z )θ p – Z θ s/p (1)
˜ 2P d t 2P d 2P d s s p s p
The velocity of the point of contact is the same for the ring gear and the planet gear:
·
ZI θI ( Z p + Zs ) · Zp · · · ·
v I = --------- - θ p û t + --------
- û = ---------------------- - θs/p û t or Z θ = ( Z + Z )θ p + Z θ s/p (2)
˜ 2P d t 2P d 2P d I I p s p
· Z · Zs ·
Equation (1) can be solved to determine θ s/p = 1 + -----s- θ p – -----
-
Z p θ s ,which, when substituted into Equation (2) yields:
Zp
· ·
ZI θI + Zs θs ·
---------------------------- = θ p (3)
2 ( Z p + Zs )
· ·
ZI θI + Zs θs ·
---------------------------- = θ p (1)
ZI + Zs
·
θp 1
The most common situation pins the ring gear, which yields, ---- -.
· - = --------------
ZI
θs ----- + 1
Zs
· ·
If, on the other hand, the ring gear is free to move, it will turn with θ I = θ s and equation (1) becomes:
· ·
· ZI θs + Zs θs ·
θp = ---------------------------- = θs (2)
ZI + Zs
· ·
If the internal gear is turned such that θ I = kθ s , where k ∈ [ 0, 1 ] , then
Z
· k -----I + 1 ·
θp kZ I + Zs Z s θp 1
· - = -------------------
----
ZI + Z s ZI ·- ∈
- = ------------------------ or ---- ---------------, 1
ZI (3)
θs ----- + 1 θs ----- + 1
Zs Zs
( Zs + ZI )
---------------------- = an integer ,
N
This condition isn’t unbreakable. However, failure to satisfy it will result in the gear teeth not meshing smoothly
and correctly and can result in excessive stresses and poor fit.
Note: there is a third law regarding interference among the planet gears themselves. However, if you are pushing
that limit, you might want to rethink your overall design. It will be ignored here. Just don’t make the planet gears
too big.
τ M = 3r p W t
Hence, the magnitude of the tangential force is divided by a factor equal to the number of planetary gears.
The net force created by the tangential component of the force is also zero. In other words, it does not provide any
load on the bearings.
6W t L
σ = -------------
2
- (1)
Ft
where σ is the axial stress at the base of the tooth, W t is the tangential force (computed earlier), and L is the theo-
retical length of the tooth, where the force acts.
This last assumption is known to be bad. However, considerable literature exists based on this assumption and it
gives a more conservative failure estimate than the actual worst case contact point, the mid-point of the tooth.
It is convenient to remove the difficult to handle variables and incorporate a fudge factor which accounts for the
tooth’s non-rectangular geometry. To this end, the Lewis Form Factor, Y, is created. Tables for this factor for
many conditions can be obtained in American Gear Manufacturer Association (AGMA) standards. This informa-
tion may also be available from gear manufacturers themselves.
6W t Y
σ = --------------
-. (2)
FP d
Note: in the modern age, these approximations can be replaced by using a Finite Element Model of the gear tooth.
SYEN4399. FIRST in Engineering 19
If you don’t have a Lewis Factor chart
Z 1 Z+1
The tooth length is approximately the pitch diameter plus the addendum, L = ----- + ----- = ------------- = m ( Z + 1 ) .
Pd Pd Pd
π πm
The tooth thickness at the pitch diameter is t = --------
- = -------- . Note, this is a smaller than the tooth thickness at the
2P d 2
root. However, it will predict a more conservative value of the maximum stress and somewhat compensates for
the fact that the tooth is not a rectangular beam.
Z + 1
6W t ------------
Pd
-
24P d W t ( Z + 1 )
σ = ----------------------------
- = ------------------------------------- (1)
π 2 Fπ
2
F --------
2P d
-
Although this last equation is not standard, it can give an estimate of the actual stress in a gear tooth, lacking
more accurate documentation.
The maximum stress in a gear tooth must not exceed the allowable stress, which is determined by the yield stress
of the material.
Normally, safety factors are applied based on loading conditions. In the AGMA standard for designing gear teeth,
there are about 10 different safety factors.
The worm is similar to a rotating rack. It is similar to a helical gear with a very high helix angle. Worm and worm
gear systems come in either right hand or left hand varieties. You cannot mix a right hand worm with a left hand
worm gear!
Worms usually have one, two, or four threads. The number of thread starts can be seen by looking down the axis
of the worm.
For calculating center distances, the pitch diameter of the worm is ( Pdn is normal diametral pitch, m n is normal
module)
zw zw mn
d w = ------------------- = ------------
- (1)
P dn sin λ sin λ
where z w is the number of thread starts (or teeth) and λ is the lead angle. This angle represents the back-drivabil-
w πz
ity of a worm/gear mesh. The lead for a worm is L = -------------------- .
P dn cos λ
z
In English gears, the diametral pitch, Pd = Pdn cos λ , is normally used and d w = ----------------
w
-.
P d tan λ
Normally the pitch diameter for both worm and worm gear will be given and calculating it is not necessary.
SYEN4399. FIRST in Engineering 21
Worm Gear Quantities
The pitch diameter for the helical worm gear is ( Pd is diametral pitch, m n is normal module)
z zg mn
d g = -----g = -----------
- (1)
Pd cos λ
1 1 zw m z zg
- ( d + d ) = --------- ----------
D = -- - + z = ------n- ----------
w
(2)
2 w g 2P d tan λ g 2 sin λ- + ------------
cos λ
Worm/gear meshes can generate tremendous gear ratios in a compact space. They also allow the turning of the
drive axis through 90° .
Because worm/gear meshes involve both rolling contact (to transmit the loads) and sliding contact, they are not as
efficient as spur gear systems. Further, since the axis is rotated, thrust loads, which may not be present in planar
gear systems, are significant. This increases the requirements on the bearing system in a worm/gear mesh.
·
θg zg
g = -----
· - = -----
- (3)
zw
θw
The variable, φ n , is the normal pressure angle (e.g. 20° , 25° , 30° ). The variable, µ , is the coefficient of friction
between the worm and the worm gear. This number is usually kept small (especially with lubrication) and varies
between values of 0.01 (well lubricated) to 0.20 (poorly lubricated).
This means that the worm gear cannot drive the worm. Since the normal condition is for the worm to drive the
worm gear, self-locking is usually expressed as the inability of the system to be “back-driven.”
In the case of drive systems, this is nice, because the motor can drive the wheel, but the wheel cannot drive the
motor.
The formula indicates that for self-locking, small lead angle, λ , must be chosen. The gears in the Stock Drive cata-
log have lead angles of 3° – 10° .
zw
Lead angle, λ = tan – 1 -----------
-
P d , is directly proportional to the number of teeth. Therefore, fewer teeth results in
d w
smaller lead angles, and better self-locking capabilities.
Buford’s lead angle, with a four tooth worm, was rather high and did not “self-lock.”
If the pressure angle is φ n , then the normal force has components F 1 = F n cos φ n and
F r1 = F n sin φ n .
Because the worm is a helical shape, summing the components of Fn and µFn in the
driving direction gives the relevant driving force:
Note that directions are reversed between the worm and worm gear, per Newton’s
third law.
SYEN4399. FIRST in Engineering 24
Driving Forces of Worm Gears
The relation between the driving torque and the worm’s force
dw dg
is τM = -----
- -----
2 F u1 . The torque on the driven gear is τ D = 2 F u2 .
zg pn
--------------- z g tan λ
d π cos λ
- = g tan λ .
-----g- = ---------------- = ---------------- (2)
dw z w pn zw
--------------
π sin λ
Thus,
2τ
Since Fu1 = ( cos φ n sin λ + µ cos λ )Fn , Fn = -----------------------------------------------------------
M
-.
( cos φ n sin λ + µ cos λ )d w
w w n z z m
Using the expressions for pitch diameter, d w = ----------------
- or d w = ------------
- , the normal force is:
P d tan λ sin λ
2τ M ( P d tan λ )
F n = ----------------------------------------------------------- (1)
( cos φ n sin λ + µ cos λ )z w
or
2τ M sin λ
F n = -----------------------------------------------------------------------
- (2)
( cos φ n sin λ + µ cos λ ) ( z w m n )
General: pressure angle ( φ n ) = 25° , pitch ( P d = 24 ), lead angle ( λ = 18.43° ), maximum drive torque: τD = 10inlb
Velocity ratio: g = 20
------ = 5 , which hardly seems worth it.
4
τ ( cos φ n cos λ – µ sin λ ) cos ( 25° ) cos ( 18.43° ) – 0.05 sin ( 18.43° )
= ( fg ) ----------------------------------------------------
( cos φ sin λ + µ cos λ ) tan λ = ( 0.9 ) ( 5 ) cos ( 25° ) sin ( 18.43° ) + 0.05 cos ( 18.43° ) tan ( 18.43° ) = 3.8 .
D - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Drive ratio: ------
τM n
Worm Axial load: Fa1 = ( cos φ n cos λ – µ sin λ )F n = ( cos ( 25° ) cos ( 18.43° ) – 0.05 sin ( 18.43° ) )120lb = 100lb .
·
Worm Gear Axial load: F a2 = ( cos φn sin λ + µ cos λ )F n = ( cos ( 25° ) sin ( 18.43° ) + 0.05 cos ( 18.43° ) )120lb = 40lb .