Course Syllabus - GE ELEC 211 PDF
Course Syllabus - GE ELEC 211 PDF
Course Syllabus - GE ELEC 211 PDF
FM-USeP-PRS-01
Republic of the Philippines
Premier Research University in the ASEAN. LEADERSHIP SKILLS Program Objectives Performance Indicators
1. Demonstrate corporate and 1. Propose social responsibility
Creates and inspires positive changes in the organization; exercises social responsibility. strategies and compliance
MISSION responsibility with integrity and accountability in the practice of one’s action plan for a business
profession or vocation. 2. Implement the basic functions 2. Propose environment-driven
USeP shall produce world-class graduates and relevant research and of management such as policy that will enhance
extension through quality education and sustainable resource CRITICAL AND ANALYTICAL THINKING SKILLS planning, organizing, business practices
management. directing, leading and
Demonstrates creativity, innovativeness, and intellectual curiosity in controlling.
GOALS optimizing available resources to develop new knowledge, methods, 3. Use the proper decision tools 3. Apply appropriate
processes, systems, and value-added technologies. to critically, analytically, and quantitative and qualitative
creatively solve problems and tool to address a case
At the end of the plan period, the University of Southeastern Philippines SERVICE ORIENTED drive results problem
(USeP) aims to achieve five comprehensive and primary goals: 4. Scan the environment to 4. Conduct of environmental
Demonstrates concern for others, practices professional ethics, honesty, identify business scanning
1. Recognized ASEAN Research University and exemplifies socio-cultural, environmental concern, and opportunities
2. ASEAN Competitive Graduates and Professionals sustainability.
3. Vibrant Research Community
4. Proactive Research-based Economic Empowering LIFELONG LEARNING
Extension Services
5. Capacity for Innovative Resource Generation Demonstrates enthusiasm and passion for continuous personal and
professional development.
PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE
Faculty Information:
As evidence of attaining the above learning outcomes, the student has to do and submit the following:
LO 1 Assignments/Short Evaluation Students will be taking quizzes to evaluate their learnings on the topic. CO 1, 2, 3 & 4
LO 2 Class Participation Students are expected to be present in all classes and participate in the discussions. CO 3 &4
Students will be given time to conduct a project based research. They will look for a business, assess its
LO 3 Research Output/Presentation CO 1, 2, 3 & 4
operations and apply the tools they learned during the classroom meetings.
LO 4 Midterm Examination
A higher level of assessment in a periodic bases to assess the students’ progress on the course. CO 1 & 3
LO 5 Final Examination
V. GRADING SYSTEM:
The final grade in this course will be composed of the following items and their weights in the final grade computation:
Assessment
Grade Source (Score or Rubric Grade) Percentage of Final Grade
Item
LO1 Score/Rubrics 30
LO2 Score 10
LO3 Rubrics 20
LO4 Score 20
LO5 Score 20
In order to achieve the outcomes of this course, learners will go through this learning plan
Note: In order to formulate intended learning outcomes, you can use a reference learning taxonomy like Bloom’s taxonomy in order to see the Low-Order Thinking Skills verbs that needs to be activated before reaching the High-
Order Thinking Skills verbs. For example, if the course outcome uses the verb DESIGN, then intended learning outcomes should include verbs starting from IDENTIFY/RECALL UNDERSTAND SYNTHESIZE ANALYZE
DESIGN. Do not forget that the rubric criteria and descriptors should serve as a guide in determining essential content or topics and its arrangement in the learning plan.
1. Hannigan, John. 2014. Environmental Sociology. 2nd or 3rd Edition. New York : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. ISBN 9780415661898
2. Leslie King and Deborah McCarthy (Editors). 2005 Environmental Sociology: From Analysis to Action. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.; Lanham MD. ISBN 0-7425-3508-8
3. Laszewski, C. (2008). The Sociologists’ Take on the Environment. Contexts, 7(2), 20–25. https://doi.org/10.1525/ctx.2008.7.2.20
4. Ashley, C & et al. (2003). Livelihood dynamics: Rural Mozambique, South Africa and Zimbabwe. IDS Bulletin. 34. 15-+.
5. Mascarenhas, M. (2009). Environmental inequality and environmental justice. Twenty lessons in environmental sociology, 127-141.
6. Journal articles as prescribed by the instructor (to be provided)
Based on the Student’s Handbook, students are allowed to be excused for 2 meetings (for TTH classes only) throughout the course of the semester. An excused absence will be considered if notified before
class (either email, sms or call). Students with an excused absence can still turn their assignments in the next scheduled meeting. No assignments will be accepted for unexcused absences.