MPLS-TP OAM in Packet Transport

Network (PTN)

Broadband Business Unit (BBU)

Nov. 2010

Steven Chen
Deputy General Manager
Product Management & Marketing
Broadband Business Unit
October 21, 2010

UTStarcom Confidential 1
Contents

• PTN Overview and Technology Advantages

– Why & What is PTN?
– PTN technology and its evolution
– MPLS-TP OAM Overview and standard progress

• MPLS-TP OAM in PTN

– Comprehensive and Hierarchical OAM in PTN
– MPLS-TP OAM Options: GACH+Y.1731 vs. BFD Extension/LSP Ping
– MPLS-TP OAM Implementation in PTN
– Migration to Standard MPLS-TP OAM

• PTN Key Application & Case-studies

– Key Applications
– China Operators PTN Case Studies

• Conclusion

UTStarcom Confidential 2
 Mobile Data Growth Drivers

Key Catalysts >100 Mbps

Data Speed
42 Mbps LTE
14 Mbps GbE (1000M)
HSPA+
HSDPA STM-1/FE(100M)
384kbps
STM-1/FE(100M)
W-CDMA
GSM E1 (ATM)
E1 (TDM)

1990s 2002 2005 2010 year

Smart Phones
Society Network & Technology
Internet
• iPhone, Blackberry, and other smart
phones driving the explosive growth in
packet traffic
• Mobile carriers have implemented 3G
and/or HSDPA to offer much higher data
speeds
• HSPA+ and LTE to offer true broadband
experience

UTStarcom Confidential 3
 Major Challenges for Service Providers

TDM 1 How to deal with Packet Traffic

Growth: Rapid Growth in 3G Mobile and
Broadband subscribers worldwide driving
Packet the demand for high-speed packet transport

Cost
2 How to improve revenue: Despite the
$
Revenue
New subscriber growth, ARPU is going down.
Cost Networks are too complex, difficult to scale,
Bandwidth and expensive to maintain. Energy and Real-
t
estate are another major challenges
Voice Dominant Data Dominant

3 How to offer New Services: Current

transport network infrastructure is not
New adequate to offer evolving mobile services
Services
such as LTE and advanced enterprise
services (e.g., EPL, EVPL)
UTStarcom Confidential 4
Major Challenges for Existing Technologies
L2 devices have No enough OAM
Residential difficulty assuring Lack of 50ms
switch over
Access
hard QoS Metro Aggregation. Transport
protection
L3 IP/MPLS Core
AG
BRAS
802
.1a
AG d
Business DSL/PON

CPE Single Tier MSTP

Corporate Hub & Spoke
Ethernet or Ring

ATM
Mobile 2G/3G
MSTP Low
E1/ATM efficiency Enterprise /VPN
Service
BTS/Node B Complexity
NG-SDH/T-MPLS IP/MPLS/VPLS
New Node B /
Base Station have
FE/GE interface
Transport Vendors Router/Switch Vendors
• Transport based technology • Router/Switch based technology
– Telecom world – Internet world
– Connection-oriented, fully controlled by Carrier – Connectionless, loosely controlled, ”peer-to-peer”,
“plug and play”
• NG-SDH, T-MPLS, RPR
• IP/MPLS/VPLS
– Metro aggregation
– Metro core to Metro aggregation
5
Choices for Service Providers

But… ▐ Doesn’t scale for packet traffic

CONTINUE ▐ No support for statistical
deploying SDH/ multiplexing – bandwidth
1 SONET for transport inefficient
▐ High CAPEX

▐ Connection-less approach
But… ▐ High OPEX – complex operation
THINK Difficult to troubleshoot – weak
2 Switch/Router for OAM
data Network ▐ Doesn’t meet 3.5G/4G
synchronization requirements

▐ Low TCO
DEPLOY ▐ Connected Oriented
3 Packet Transport ▐ Statistical multiplexing; Powerful
OAM functions
Network
▐ Meets mobile synchronization
requirements
UTStarcom Confidential 6
 What is PTN?

Packet Network
Best of both
▐ Statistical
multiplexing, flexible worlds
transport containers
▐ Service aware
▐ Advanced QOS IP, Ethernet, MPLS
▐ Scalable
▐ Cost effective
(Ethernet based) Packet
Convergence Transport
Network
Transport Network
▐ Connection Oriented
▐ High clock accuracy • Multi-service transport over
Packet
▐ Resilient (50ms • Statistical Multiplexing
switch-over) MSTP/MSPP
(SDH/SONET) • Connection Oriented
▐ Comprehensive OAM
• Deterministic data plane
▐ Multi-service support • Hard QoS
▐ Static or dynamic • Comprehensive OAM
Provisioning
• Network & equipment
protection
Note: PTN is sometimes also referred to as P-OTS or POTP

UTStarcom Confidential 7
 PTN Technology Choices
PTN Technology Choices

T-MPLS PBB-TE
• A new formulation of MPLS, being • A subset of IEEE Provider Backbone
standardized by ITU-T, and designed Bridging (802.1ah) that turns Ethernet
specifically for a connection-oriented connectionless networking into a
packet transport network based on provisioned connection-oriented transport
well-known and widely deployed network primarily for point-to-point
IP/MPLS technology and standards Ethernet virtual connections

T-MPLS = MPLS (PW/LSP) + OAM – L3 Complexity PBT＝ Ethernet (MAC/MAC)+OAM – L2 Complexity

PBT and T-MPLS are major PTN technology choices base on different migration path
UTStarcom Confidential 8
PTN Standards Overview

PTN Standard
organization

focus on improvement
and enhancement on Focus on MPLS、PWE3 focus on T-MPLS
Ethernet technology, and VPLS etc, standard, formed JWT
such as: RPR、ERP、 standard。 team with IETF for
PBB、PBT MPLS-TP in March 2008
formed JWT with I-
TUT, and promote the
PBB/PBT/ RPR
MPLS-TP MPLS-TP

Ethernet
Ethernet

PBB/PBT ?
IP/POS
IP/POS MPLS
MPLS
MPLS-TP
MPLS-TP
ATM
ATM
T-MPLS
T-MPLS

UTS TN Product Line

SDH
SDH NG-SDH
NG-SDH Pre MPLS-TP

OTN
OTN
WDM
WDM
UTStarcom Confidential 9
MPLS-TP Overview

Joint Working Team

•• Management
Management Plane:
Plane:
–– Statically
Statically configure
configure LSP
LSP and
and PW
PW and
and manage
manage via
via NMS
NMS NMS
–– OAM
OAM handling
handling

•• Control
Control Plane:
Plane:
–– Optional
Optional
Control Plane
–– LSP,
LSP, PW,
PW, and
and OAM
OAM not
not dependent
dependent upon
upon control
control plane
plane
–– Static
Static provisioning
provisioning via
via NMS;
NMS;
–– Dynamic
Dynamic Provisioning
Provisioning (e.g.,
(e.g., LSP:
LSP: RSVP-TE,
RSVP-TE, GMPLS,
GMPLS, PW:
PW: RFC
RFC 4447)
4447) Working-Group
under
under study
study
MPLS-TP Focus Areas
MPLS-TP
•• Data
Data Plane:
Plane:
–– Fully
Fully compatible
compatible with
with MPLS
MPLS
Protection
–– Forwarding
Forwarding based
based on
on LSP/PW
LSP/PW Label
Label
–– Bi-directional
Bi-directional path
path (LSP)
(LSP) for
for traffic
traffic and
and OAM
OAM
–– OAM
OAM support
support via
via Associated
Associated Channel
Channel (PW (PW ACH
ACH && GE
GE ACH)
ACH) OAM
–– MPLS
MPLS based
based Protection
Protection mechanism
mechanism
–– Pseudo-wire
Pseudo-wire encapsulation
encapsulation forfor all
all traffic
traffic types
types (Ethernet,
(Ethernet, ATM,
ATM,
SDH/SONET,
Forwarding
SDH/SONET, and and PDH)
PDH)
–– Transport
Transport hierarchy
hierarchy similar
similar to
to SDH/SONET
SDH/SONET –– nested
nested PW
PW and
and LSP
LSP

UTStarcom Confidential 10
MPLS-TP OAM Overview

• OAM (Operation, Administration, and Maintenance) Basic Roles

– Fault Detection & diagnostic: Continuity Check/Connectivity Verification (CC/CV),
Loopback (LB)
– Alarm and Alarm suppress: Generate alarm when fault happens but suppress
large volume alarm through AIS/RDI (Alarm Correlation Suppression)
– Performance monitor: packet loss ratio (LM), delay measurement (DM)
– Maintenance tools: Link track (LT), Lock (LCK)
– APS OAM: Linear and Ring APS
• MPLS-TP OAM with IETF and ITU-T
– ITU-T and IETF in many technical aspects of the compromise, MPLS-TP OAM
inherited the T-MPLS G.8114 part of the agreement, but the rest of codecs and
protocols supplementary part, by the major inheritance from the IETF.

MPLS-TP & MPLS

MPLS-TP & T-MPLS G.8114
UTStarcom Confidential 11
MPLS-TP OAM Standard Progress Update(1)

UTStarcom Confidential 12
MPLS-TP OAM Standard Progress Update(2)

UTStarcom Confidential 13
Contents

• PTN Overview and Technology Advantages

– Why & What is PTN?
– PTN technology and its evolution
– MPLS-TP OAM Overview and standard progress

• MPLS-TP OAM in PTN

– Comprehensive and Hierarchical OAM in PTN
– MPLS-TP OAM Options: GACH+Y.1731 vs. BFD Extension/LSP Ping
– MPLS-TP OAM Implementation in PTN
– Migration to Standard MPLS-TP OAM

• PTN Key Application & Case-studies

– Key Applications
– China Operators PTN Case Studies

• Conclusion

UTStarcom Confidential 14
 Comprehensive & Hierarchical OAM in PTN

¾ Based
¾ Based onon Ethernet,
Ethernet, ITU-T,
ITU-T, and
and MPLS-TP
MPLS-TP standards
standards
¾ Multi-layer
¾ Multi-layer OAM
OAM support
support
¾ Client
¾ Layer: ATM,
Client Layer: ATM, SDH/SONET,
SDH/SONET, and and Ethernet
Ethernet
¾ MPLS-TP
¾ Layer: PW
MPLS-TP Layer: PW and
and LSP
LSP (using
(using associated
associated channel
channel mechanism
mechanism as
as shown
shown below)
below)
¾ Network
¾ Network Uplink layer: Ethernet
Uplink layer: Ethernet and
and SDH/SONET
SDH/SONET

LSP monitoring and alarming

Generic Exception Label and Generic Associated Channel
Many options including Non IP BFD is an option encapsulation of Y.1731 pdu
Ethernet
Header
L1 L2 LFU/BoS Generic ACH Channel Payload

0001 | Ver | Resv | Channel Type

Pseudo-wire monitoring and alarming

PW-Associated Channel
Ethernet
Header
L1 L2 PWL/BoS PWE-3 ACH Channel Payload

0001 | Ver | Resv | Channel Type

UTStarcom Confidential 15
MPLS-TP OAM Functions and Implementation

UTStarcom Confidential 16
MPLS-TP Implementation in PTN
• Pre-standard MPLS-TP OAM Implementation in PTN
– Send OAM packet between MEP/MIP in PTN network. Detect fault and
performance through OAM packet exchanges, generate alarm and related
process
– Pre-standard MPLS-TP OAM
mechism is implemented in current
PTN products like T-MPLS G.8114 or
MPLS Y. 1711
– OAM packet is sent/received/handled
by PTN equipment (normally using
FPGA Hardware to handle OAM
packet). The CV interval can be up to
3.3ms per OAM packet. Fault can be
detected within 10ms when 3 packet
missed (3*3.3ms=10ms) which trigger
protection switch. Pre-standard OAM: CV – packet capture
• MPLS-TP OAM Option 1: GACH+ • MPLS-TP OAM Option 2: BFD/LSP
Y.1731 Ping Extension
– Draft-Bhh-mpls-tp-oam-y.1731 – 9 other Drafts
– Use RFC 5586 GACH package – Use RFC 5586 GACH package
– OAM total solution and fulfill operator’s – BFD extension supports proactive
requirements CC/CV/RDI, LSP Ping support on-
– Support proactive/on-demand CC/CV, demand CC/CV, new tools for other
AIS, RDI, LB, LCK, TST, APS, LM, functions
DM

UTStarcom Confidential 17
OAM Options:
G.Ach+Y.1731 vs. BFD/LSP Ping Extension

1 2 3 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Y.1731 frame format：

Tunnel label (13) TC S TTL • use MPLS date plane
0001 0000 00000000 Channel Type（Y.1731 OAM） (Label: 13)
MEL Version OpCode Flags TLV offset
• Use G.ACH
OAM PDU payload area（Y.1731）
• use OpCode identify
OAM type
End TLV

1 2 3 4
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 BFD extensions frame
LSP label TC S TTL format：
label (13) TC S TTL •Use MPLS date plane
0001 Version Res Channel Type
(Label: 13)
ACH TLV Header
•Use G.ACH
OAM PDU payload area（BFD、LSP Ping、新定义） • use Channel Type
identify OAM type
End TLV

„ Y.1731 has better fault detection function but limited in L2 and below
„ BFD expansion can support fault detection up to L3 and below
UTStarcom Confidential 18
GACH+Y.1731 and BFD Expansion
Standard Progress

Basic OAM requirements GACH+Y.1731 BFD Expansion

Continuity Check/ Connectivity • IETF draft（draft-asm-mpls-tp-bfd-cc (close to

1 complete) draft-ietf-mpls-tp-lsp-ping-bfd-
Verification (CC/CV) procedures-00）(incomplete)

2 Connectivity Verification on
demand (CV) • IETF draft（draft-nitinb-mpls-tp-lsp-ping-
extensions）(incomplete)
3 Route Tracing

4 • IETF draft（draft-flh-mpls-tp-oam-diagnostic-test）
Testing (incomplete)
Debug test • IETF draft
Loopback （draft-bhh- • IETF draft (draft-boutros-mpls-tp-loopback)
mpls-tp-oam- (incomplete)
5 Lock indicate
y1731）,
6 Lock • (close to
complete) • IETF draft (draft-ietf-mpls-tp-fault)
• (close to complete)
7 Alarm indication singal (AIS)

8 • IETF draft (draft-asm-mpls-tp-bfd-cc-cv)

Remote Alarm Indication (RAI) • (close to complete)

9 • IETF draft（draft-he-mpls-tp-csf）
Client Signal Failure (CSF) • (incomplete)

10 Packet loss measurement

• IETF draft （draft-frost-mpls-tp-loss-delay）
(incomplete)
11 Delay measurement

UTStarcom Confidential 19
G.Ach+Y.1731 OAM Packet Definition

1 2 3 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Tunnel label (13) TC S TTL

0001 0000 00000000 Channel Type（Y.1731 OAM）
MEL Version OpCode Flags TLV offset

OAM PDU payload area（Y.1731）

End TLV

G.Ach MPLS-TP OAM Packet Format Definiation

OAM PDU Frame definitions:

a. Tunnel label:16 bits, value = 13, GAL
b. TC: 3 bits, traffic classification;
c. S: 1 bit, Value=1 means bottom of stack;
d. TTL: 8 bit, Value=1 or MEP to MEP hops+1;
e. channel type identify it is an OAM packet;
f. MEL: Maintenance entity level; configurable, default = “7”;
g. Version: Identify OAM protocol version, set to 0
h. OpCode define OAM PDU packet type (see right table) OpCode Definition
i. TLV offset: 8 bits, related to OAM PDU type, Value=0 means TLV
offset one byte;
j. OAM PDU payload area: OAM PDU packet content;
k. End TLV：8 bit, identify end of OAM PDU packet

UTStarcom Confidential 20
Select G.ach +Y.1731 as PTN OAM
• CMCC/China CCSA select G.ach +Y.1731 as PTN OAM standard
– Treat draft-bhh-mpls-tp-oam-y.1731 as option of MPLS-TP OAM
– Y.1731 Ethernet OAM: 0x8902
– Select RFC5586 experimental Code Point 32767 (7FFF) as channel type
– Alliance:
• PTN vendor: Al-Lu, Huawei, ZTE, Fiberhome, UTStarcom;
• Operators: China Mobile, China telecom, China Unicom, TI, CJK, telefonica etc.
– Push the acceptance and standard process in ITU-T and IETF

Option 1: GACH+Y.1731 Option 2: MPLS-TP & MPLS

Mature, meet all the requirement Not complete and not mature,
at technical point of view can not meet short term
Easy upgrade from existing PTN requirements (at least another 2
system to support this years to be mature)
Mechanism Hard to upgrade from existing
Better availability, Large volume PTN system to support this
PTN deployed in CMCC and mechanism, hardware upgrade
most PTN equipment can might be necessary
upgrade to to support it in short Consensus and might be final
term standard at last
No equipment or vendor
declare support it
UTStarcom Confidential 21
Migration to MPLS-TP OAM

• MPLS-TP standards Progress

– Standards still in development by the JWT from ITU-T and IETF.
– MPLS-TP is based on PWE3 and LSP forwarding architecture which is within
IETF MPLS standards. So there are minimal changes in the LSP and PW data-
structure

• Upgrading to MPLS-TP OAM

– More comprehensive OAM features to handle the end-to-end management of
network than IP/MPLS.
– MPLS-TP OAM standards are still under development, hence current installed
equipment will have to be upgraded to support the new OAM formats and
messages to comply with Standard

UTStarcom will ensure smooth migration to MPLS-

TP OAM without any service disruption

UTStarcom Confidential 22
TN OAM Upgrade Scenario

TN705
TN725

TN703

• When MPLS-TP OAM standards are finalized, TN series can be upgraded

to work on dual OAM formats simultaneously (Dual-Mode): one mode
supports the old format, and another one supports the new format that
complies with the finalized MPLS-TP standards.
• The whole upgrade process is divided into two steps:
1. upgrade each node to support dual OAM formats
2. activate the LSP to support new OAM format.
UTStarcom Confidential 23
Contents

• PTN Overview and Technology Advantages

– Why & What is PTN?
– PTN technology and its evolution
– MPLS-TP OAM Overview and standard progress

• MPLS-TP OAM in PTN

– Comprehensive and Hierarchical OAM in PTN
– MPLS-TP OAM Options: GACH+Y.1731 vs. BFD Extension/LSP Ping
– MPLS-TP OAM Implementation in PTN
– Migration to Standard MPLS-TP OAM

• PTN Key Application & Case-studies

– Key Applications
– China Operators PTN Case Studies

• Conclusion

UTStarcom Confidential 24
 Mobile Backhaul using PTN

Cell Site Mobile Backhaul Cell Site Mobile Backhaul

A-bis

E1/T1 T1/E1 (Copper) T1/E1 (Copper)

2G BTS SDH/SONET
AAL2/5 2G BTS

ATM

IMA

E1/T1
3G Node B
3G Node B
IP

MLPPP ATM Any traffic over

ATM ATM MPLS-TP
E1/T1 (Copper or Fiber) (IMA/STM-1)

AAL2/5
3G Node B
ATM 3G Node B

STM-1
Ethernet
LTE (Fiber, GPON, xDSL)
IP over Ethernet Ethernet
or MPLS (Fiber, GPON, xDSL)
UDP/IP
3G NodeB or
Ethernet LTE eNodeB 3G NodeB or
LTE eNodeB

Migration
Migration to
to Unified
Unified Transport
Transport Network
Network

UTStarcom Confidential 25
 SDH/MSTP Replacement

BSC
Classic BTS E1
E1 TDM
TDM (SDH)
(SDH)
2G, 3G, HSDPA, NB
E1
LTE, … RNC
STM1

BSC
Hybrid BTS TDM
TDM (SDH/MSTP)
(SDH/MSTP) E1
E1
2G, 3G, HSDPA, NB
E1
LTE, … RNC
Eth Packet
Packet
(PTN)
(PTN) STM1
Eth

Packet BTS
Eth
BSC
E1
2G, 3G, HSDPA, NB
Broadband Packet
Packet (PTN)
(PTN)
Eth
Aggregation, RNC
Enterprise, LTE, Enterprise STM1
Eth
BB access Eth
…
UTStarcom Confidential 26
 Migrate to PTN at China Operators

China Operators’ PTN Market

China Mobile (CMCC) China Telecom (CTC) China Unicom (CUC)

1. Start PTN research with PTN 1. Start CE (Carry Ethernet) test 1. Start CE (Carry Ethernet)
vendors since Q3/2007. at Q4/2006 and switch PTN test since 2008 and did a few
technology later trials.
2. Start PTN equipment and IOP test
since Q4/2008; 2. After PTN investigation and 2. Switch to PTN and start
research, start large scale PTN PTN test Q4/2009 and
3. Mobile backhaul by PTN field trial finished at Q1/2009
test since Q3/2009
Q1/2009 and 1588v2 test in Q2/09
3. PTN field trail since Q1/2010; 3. Start PTN field trial
4. First PTN purchase Q4/2009 and Q2/2010 and close to 2000
more than 3000 PTN nodes trial
send phase purchase Q2/2010. PTN nodes are running in the
in the network
More than 100K PTN nodes are field.
installed and carrying living traffic.

Orientation has been confirmed

that evolution is inevitable

UTStarcom Confidential 27
 Case Study – Mobile Operator China

2G Network
3G Network
Ref.
MS clock

E1 E1
ATM
SDH NodeB SDH

BTS BSC
ATM

NodeB

Customer Background & Pain-points

•• Over
Over 470
470 million
million subscribers
subscribers –– includes
includes 2G
2G and
and 3G
3G (400,000+
(400,000+ base
base stations
stations installed
installed and
and growing)
growing)
•• Operates
Operates not not only
only basic
basic mobile
mobile voice
voice services
services but
but also
also value-added
value-added services
services such
such as
as data,IP
data,IP
telephone and multimedia.
telephone and multimedia.
•• Start
Start to
to deploy
deploy TD-SCDMA
TD-SCDMA 3G 3G network
network since
since 2008
2008
•• Looking
Looking forfor IP
IP RAN
RAN solution
solution scalable
scalable toto support
support future
future data
data service
service and
and at
at the
the same
same time
time support
support
TDM
TDM andand other
other legacy
legacy services
services such
such as
as ATM
ATM
•• Has
Has deployed
deployed more more than
than 100K
100K PTN
PTN nodes
nodes network
network since
since 2009
2009
•• Start
Start MPLS-TP
MPLS-TP OAM OAM IOPIOP base
base onon GACh+Y.7131
GACh+Y.7131

UTStarcom Confidential 28
CMCC 3G (TD-SCDMA) Network Migration

•Current 2G/GSM Networks : TDM based BTS • Current 3G/TD-SCDMA Networks : ATM IMAE1
and BSC. E1 at BTS, STM-1 and E1 at BSC at Node B, Channelized STM-1 at RNC

Ref.
MS clock

E1 E1
ATM
SDH/MSTP NodeB SDH
RNC
BTS BSC ATM

NodeB

•Future 3G/TD-SCDMA Networks : FE

• Sync Requirement in current 3G/TD-
at Node B, GE at RNC SCDMA Networks
– Base stations need frequency sync: +/-
Ref.
clock 0.05ppm, and phase sync: +/- 3us
GE – For base stations, reference clock is
NodeB PTN distributed via GPS or PTN.
RNC • Time sync between NodeB and
FE
GPS/PTN: +/- 1.5us
NodeB

UTStarcom Confidential 29
Requirement Highlights

•Requirements to PTN:
-Converged network to support multiple type of services: legacy E1, ATM and future FE
-Common network for wireless and fixed line broadband service
-Reliability, QOS, OAM, controllable and manageable
-Performance including delay, jitter
-Privacy
-Inter-working with IP/MPLS and SDH/NGSDH
-Distribute Frequency and time synchronization to Base stations
• MPLS-TP PTN solution address these requirements by
-Multi-service support
-Carries class design with hardware redundancy and OAM to support <50ms protection
switching, fault detection and monitoring of tunnels
-Use of network management systems to pre-configured CIR, EIR Bandwidth, control how
tunnels are configured or provisioned

-Provide frequency synchronization signal to BTS and Node B (+/- 0.05ppm) and time
signal in the future
-End to end QOS
UTStarcom Confidential 30
 UTS PTN Value Proposition

Competing
Technology/Product UTS PTN Advantages TN Solution Set

• Data friendly – statistical multiplexing,

• MSTP flexible transport containers, easy inter-
• MSPP working
• SDH/SONET • Advanced QOS control & Multicast TN703
Transport • Bandwidth Efficient & Scalable

• Connection Oriented, end to end QoS TN705

• Carrier Ethernet • High clock accuracy
• Resiliency on par with TDM network
• Comprehensive OAM
• Multi-service support TN725
• Powerful Network management for e2e
service provisioning

• Other T-MPLS/MPLS- • State-of-art pure-packet architecture

TP based PTN • Competitive cost TN735
products • Diverse set of interfaces (TDM, ATM, IP)
• PBB-TE based • Compact platform Converged
products
• MPLS-TP (pre-standard) Compliant Transport
• Service oriented NMS Solution

UTStarcom Confidential 31
Contents

• PTN Overview and Technology Advantages

– Why & What is PTN?
– PTN technology and its evolution
– MPLS-TP OAM Overview and standard progress

• MPLS-TP OAM in PTN

– Comprehensive and Hierarchical OAM in PTN
– MPLS-TP OAM Options: GACH+Y.1731 vs. BFD Extension/LSP Ping
– MPLS-TP OAM Implementation in PTN
– Migration to Standard MPLS-TP OAM

• PTN Key Application & Case-studies

– Key Applications
– China Operators PTN Case Studies

• Conclusion

UTStarcom Confidential 32
 PTN -- The Best choice of Metro Access &
Aggregation (1)
Meet New Services’ Requirements

nd d
• Higher bandwidth: from E1/STM-1 to FE/GE; from dial in

ba oa
IP
to xDSL to xPON; From nx64kbps to nx Mbps;

Br
• Real time: real time application; clock sync; time sync
• Low delay and delay variance: Delay and Jitter sensitivity
service
Mobile
• Higher performance: advanced QoS, CIR/EIR, CBS/EBS
• Higher availability: 99.999% and higher
• Mobility: from fix to mobile
• Resilience: sub 50ms switch time
• …… IPTV/Medium Enterprise Live TV
VoIP Video Phone/
stream VPN conference
• Real-time • Real-time • Committed • Real-time
• High bandwidth • High performance bandwidth • Committed bandwidth
New • High performance • <50ms Protection • Service • Protection
• <50ms protection isolation • P-t-P/ MP-t-MP
Services • Aggregation to core
Requirements • Multicast supporting router • Fixed route
• Aggregation to video
• P-to-MP • Fixed route server
• Fixed route • Fixed route

Bandwidth • Jitter/latency • protection • Security

UTStarcom Confidential 33
PTN -- The Best choice of Metro Access &
Aggregation (2)

Meet Network Migration’s Requirements

• Multi-services support
• Support ATM, TDM, Ethernet services in an unified access/aggregation
network.
• Topology free:
• support any topology as the existing fiber network
• Operation continuity:
• Utilize rich transport operation experience in past decade;
• Centralized powerful network management system (NMS)
• Simply training and quick knowledge transfer;
• Continue to use the existing operation process and can change step by
step;
• Hierarchical OAM for quick fault isolation and trouble shooting
• High accuracy sync clock and time delivery
• ……
ATM
TDM
LSP
Ethernet

TDM • ATM • Ethernet • Topology Free • Operation

UTStarcom Confidential 34
PTN -- The Best choice of Metro Access &
Aggregation (3)
Lower CAPEX and OPEX
• Network and equipment simplify：
• Aggregated traffic (from access to core) dominate Metro access &aggregation
network
• Connection oriented and mainly permanent network connection circuit
• No addressing and routing is required at most of time (fixed route)
• No full Mesh network existing at Metro access & aggregation
• Reduce the complexity of network operation
• Hierarchical network structure– Independent packet transport layer; Not peer
IP/MPLS Network; avoid large scale of IP/MPLS domain
• Manage and maintenance much more equipments per engineer simultaneously
(hundreds vs. tens)
New Network
Network
• Lower transfer cost New
Services
Services Investment
Investment
• Simpler IP address planning; Not touch customer’s
IP planning
• Smaller footprint Achieve the Goal
• Lower power consumption
• ……
Operation
Operation

Simplify • Reduce complexity • Smaller • Lower

UTStarcom Confidential 35
 NetRing TN – Packet Transport Network
Product Portfolio

Switching
• Under Developing Capacity
• Aggregation/Core Device

TN 735*
• Aggregation Device
• Medium size

TN 725 320/640 Gb/s

• Edge/Aggregation device
• Compact

• 108/160 Gb/s
Edge Device
TN 705
• 1U Entry Level Pizza box

• Under TN 703 88 Gb/s

Developing
• CPE box
6.4/44 Gb/s
TN 701*
<6.4Gb/s

1U 3U 7U 18U
Chassis Size
UTStarcom Confidential 36
 Thank you

UTStarcom Confidential 37