Post Workshop Topic01 (Ch01)
Post Workshop Topic01 (Ch01)
Post Workshop Topic01 (Ch01)
Students should study about the Multinational Financial Management (Chapter 01)
thoroughly to prepare Mid Term Test. As part of mid test preparation, students
should solve following post-topic01 problems by employing their
understandings/concepts that have been developed through pre-topic01 and topic01
sessions.
Post-Topic01 Problems
b. Why might agency costs be larger for an MNC than for a purely domestic
company?
2. Comparative advantage
a. Explain how the theory of comparative advantage relates to the need for
international business.
b. Explain how the product cycle theory relates to the growth of an MNC.
3. Imperfect markets
a. Explain how the existence of imperfect markets has led to the establishment of
subsidiaries in foreign markets.
b. If perfect markets existed, would wages, prices and interest rates among countries
be more similar or less similar than under conditions of imperfect markets? Why?
4. International opportunities
a. Do you think the acquisition of a foreign company or licensing will result in greater
growth for an MNC? Which alternative is likely to have more risk?
1
c. Explain why MNCs such as Coca-Cola and PepsiCo, Inc., still have numerous
opportunities for international expansion.
11. Exposure to exchange rates Australian Vintage has a French subsidiary that
produces wine and exports to various European countries. All of the countries where
it sells its wine use the euro as their currency, which is the same as the currency
used in France. Is Australian Vintage exposed to exchange rate risk?
14. International business methods Sydney Golf Co., an Australian company that
sells high-quality golf clubs in Australia, wants to expand internationally by selling the
same golf clubs in China.
a. Describe the trade-offs that are involved for each method (such as exporting,
direct foreign investment, etc.) that Sydney Golf Co. could use to achieve its goal.
b. Which method of international method would you recommend for this company?
Justify your recommendation.
a. Explain how the joint venture enabled Coopers to achieve its objective of
maximising shareholder wealth.
b. Explain how the joint venture limited the risk of the international business.
c. Many international joint ventures are intended to circumvent barriers that normally
prevent foreign competition. What barrier in Japan did Coopers circumvent as a
result of the joint venture? What barrier in Australia did Kirin circumvent as a result of
the joint venture?
d. Explain how Coopers could have lost some of its market share in countries
outside Japan as a result of this particular joint venture.
b. TechnologyOne plans to acquire a large company in India that is riskier than its
existing businesses.
2
d. TechnologyOne plans to export a small amount of materials to Malaysia that are
denominated in Malaysian ringgits.
29. Exposure of MNCs to exchange rate movements Because of the low labour
costs in Thailand, Melnick Co. (based in the United States) recently established a
major research and development subsidiary there that it owns. The subsidiary was
created to improve new products that the parent of Melnick can sell in the United
States (denominated in dollars) to US customers. The subsidiary pays its local
employees in baht (the Thai currency). The subsidiary has a small amount of sales
denominated in baht, but its expenses are much larger than its revenue. It has just
obtained a large loan denominated in baht that will be used to expand its subsidiary.
The business that the parent of Melnick Co. conducts in the United States is not
exposed to exchange rate risk. If the Thai baht weakens over the next three years,
will the value of Melnick Co. be favourably affected, unfavourably affected, or
unaffected? Briefly explain.
31. MNC cash flows and exchange rate risk Tuscaloosa Co. is a US company that
assembles phones in Argentina and transports the final assembled products to the
parent, which sells them in the United States. The assembled products are invoiced
in dollars. The Argentine subsidiary obtains some material from China, and the
Chinese exporter is willing to accept Argentine pesos as payment for the materials
that it exports. The Argentine subsidiary pays its employees in the local currency
(pesos) and finances its operations with loans from an Argentine bank (in pesos).
Tuscaloosa Co. has no other international business. If the Argentine peso
depreciates against the US dollar over time, will that have a favourable,
unfavourable, or neutral effect on Tuscaloosa Co.? Briefly explain.
a. Assume that Bangor Co. (an Australian company) knows that it will have cash
inflows of A$900,000 from domestic operations, cash inflows of 200,000 Malaysian
ringgit (MYR) due to export to Malaysian operations, and cash outflows of 500,000
Malaysian ringgit at the end of the year. While the future value of the Malaysian
ringgit is uncertain because it fluctuates, your best guess is that the Malaysian
ringgit’s value will be A$0.35 at the end of this year. What are the expected
Australian dollar cash flows of Bangor Co?
b. Assume that Concord Co. (an Australian company) is in the same industry as
Bangor Co. There is no political risk that could have any impact on the cash flows of
either company. Concord Co. knows that it will have cash inflows of A$900,000 from
domestic operations, cash inflows of 700,000 Malaysian ringgit due to export to
Malaysian operations, and cash outflows of 800,000 Malaysian ringgit at the end of
the year. Is the valuation of the total cash flows of Concord Co. more uncertain or
less uncertain than the total cash flows of Bangor Co.? Explain briefly.
3
37. Exposure of MNC cash flows
b. Rochester Co. considers a new project in which it would also attract people from
Spain, and the institute in France would teach them the French language. It would
charge them tuition fees in euros. The expenses for this project would be about the
same as the expenses of the project described above for the American students.
Also assume that euros to be generated by this project would be stable over the next
several years. Assume that this project is about the same size as the project for
American students. For either project, the expected annual revenue is just slightly
larger than the expected annual expenses. Is the valuation of net cash flows subject
to a higher degree of exchange rate risk for this project or for the project for
American students? Briefly explain.