Basic NMR Concepts:: A Guide For The Modern Laboratory
Basic NMR Concepts:: A Guide For The Modern Laboratory
Basic NMR Concepts:: A Guide For The Modern Laboratory
Description:
This handout is designed to furnish you with a basic understanding of Nuclear Magnetic
Resonance (NMR) Spectroscopy. The concepts implicit and fundamental to the operation
of a modern NMR spectrometer, with generic illustrations where appropriate, will be
described. It can be read without having to be in front of the spectrometer itself. Some
basic understanding of NMR spectroscopy is assumed.
Table of Contents:
I. Introduction
2) Signal-to-noise measurements
3) Integration
4) Homonuclear decoupling
13
5) C-{1H} spectra
13
6) C-{1H} DEPT spectra
1
BU-CIC-12-04
Introduction
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) is a powerful relatively non-selective
analytical tool, which enables you to ascertain molecular structure including relative
configuration, relative and absolute concentrations, and even intermolecular interactions.
Once challenging and specialized NMR techniques have become routine. NMR is indeed
an indispensable tool for the modern scientist. Chemists, with little knowledge of NMR,
are now able to obtain 2- or even 3-dimensional spectra with a few clicks of a button.
Care must be taken, however, when using such ‘black box’ approaches. While the
standard parameters used in the set-up macros for experiments might be adequate for one
sample, NMR system, or hardware configuration, they may be very wrong for another. A
single incorrectly set parameter can mean the difference between getting an accurate,
realistic spectrum and getting a meaningless result, or even worse, damaging equipment
that often costs several hundreds of thousands of dollars. A basic understanding of a few
key aspects of NMR spectroscopy can ensure that you obtain the best results possible.
This guide is intended to highlight the most pertinent aspects of practical NMR
spectroscopy. It is not meant to replace any formal training of the theory of NMR.
This section will give you enough information about FT-NMR experiments to
avoid the most common errors. We will cover the most important parameters that affect
any spectrum you may collect using an FT-NMR spectrometer. These are:
2
BU-CIC-12-04
[The blue letters in square brackets following the parameter represent the mnemonic used
(the command), on all Varian spectrometers in the VNMR software package. The
parameters are discussed in more detail below.]
The most basic and common pulse sequence you will encounter is the ‘1-PULSE’
FT-NMR experiment (e.g. seqfil = ‘s2pul’ in VNMR), which is the sequence used for
routine 1H and 13C acquisitions. It can be represented as shown in Figure 1. In a typical
NMR acquisition, this pulse sequence will be repeated many times in order to improve
the signal-to-noise ratio (S/N), which increases with the square root of the number of
transients that are averaged together (nt). The user can independently set each of the
parameters shown in Figure 1. Knowledge of their purpose and function will help you
obtain quality NMR spectra. On Varian spectrometers, you can view the current pulse
sequence by typing ‘dps’.
Pulse Width (pw)
It is called a “1-PULSE” experiment because one radio frequency (Rf) pulse (pw)
is applied per cycle. The Rf pulse excites the nuclei, which then emit Rf during the
acquisition time, giving rise to an NMR signal in the form of an exponentially decaying
sine wave, termed free-induction decay (FID). The Rf pulse has a characteristic
frequency, called the spectrometer frequency (sfrq), which is dependent upon the nucleus
you wish to observe and the magnetic field strength of the spectrometer. NMR
spectrometers are generally named for the frequency at which hydrogen atoms resonate.
Thus, a Varian INOVA 500 will cause hydrogen atoms to resonate at approximately 500
MHz. The precise spectrometer frequency defines the exact center of the NMR spectrum
you measure.
An Rf pulse that excites spins at only one exact frequency is not desirable because
the NMR frequencies are spread out over a range of frequencies called the range of
chemical shifts (corresponding to ~10 ppm of the applied magnetic field for 1H and ~250
3
BU-CIC-12-04
ppm for 13C). Luckily, the short pulse lengths used in FT-NMR (e.g. ~10 µs) causes the
Rf power to be distributed over a corresponding frequency spread (~1/pw, or 1/0.00001
seconds = ~100,000 Hz) due to the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. As you shorten the
pulse length and increase power, uncertainty in the frequency results in a larger field of
excitation (frequency range of power deposition). A longer, lower power pulse will have
less frequency spread and can be used for frequency selective excitation or saturation.
Prior to applying an Rf pulse, the majority of nuclear spins are aligned parallel to
the static magnetic field (B0). The axis of alignment is typically designated the Z-axis
and the bulk magnetization is shown as a bold arrow (Figure 2, left side). Application of
a short Rf pulse at the appropriate frequency will rotate the bulk magnetization by a
specific angle. Pulses are generally described by this angle of rotation (also called flip
angle). The angle of rotation is dependent on the intensity of the pulse (tpwr) and the
width of the pulse (pw). The maximum measurable signal can be recorded following a
90º rotation or pulse. Thus, a 90º pulse width is defined as the amount of time the pulse
of Rf energy is applied to the particular sample (90º is not 90º for all samples!) in order to
flip the bulk magnetization from the Z-axis precisely into the X-Y plane, i.e., the
condition shown in Figure 2A. For example, the 90º pulse width for 1H NMR
experiments might be about 8 µs on the Varian Inova 500. It is often very useful to talk
about the strength of the oscillating magnetic field associated with the Rf pulse in terms
of the rotation frequency (rather than the time required to rotate the bulk magentization
90º). For example, if it takes 8 µs to rotate 90º, then using the same Rf intensity it will
take 4*8µs = 32 µs to rotate 360º. The intensity of the Rf field can then be described as a
magnetic field that causes the magnetization to rotate at a rate of 1/32 µs, or at 31,250 Hz
(31.25 KHz). We call this magnetic field the B1 field, analogous to our description of the
main static magnetic field (B0). (Note: a 300, 400, or 500 MHz static B0 field is roughly
10,000-20,000 times stronger than a typical oscillating B1 field that comes from the Rf
pulse). The importance of learning this convention will become strongly apparent when
you setup a homonuclear decoupling or nOe experiments, or perhaps a two-dimensional
TOCSY experiment.
4
BU-CIC-12-04
Z Z
900
A) PW= 10 µs (900)
Y Y
B0
X X
Z Z
450
B) PW= 5 µs (450 )
Y Y
B0
X X
Figure 2. The bulk nuclear spin magnetization (bold arrow) for an NMR sample placed
in a magnetic field aligned along the Z-axis before and after application of a pulse.
Thus far, we have sent an Rf pulse through the sample and flipped the bulk
magnetization by a specific angle. The nuclear spins are no longer at equilibrium and
will eventually return to equilibrium along the Z-axis. One of the most extraordinary
aspects of NMR is that the relaxation back to equilibrium takes from 106-1012 times
longer than many other spectroscopies that you routinely utilize! In Figure 1, the
decaying sine wave represents this process of Free Induction Decay (FID), which is a plot
of emitted radio intensity as a function of time. The time it takes to acquire the FID is
called the acquisition time and is set by the parameter ‘at’. For most nuclei of interest to
chemists, relaxation times are within the range of 10-1 to 10 seconds. One of the most
important concepts that chemists should learn is that routine matching of the acquisition
time to the full decay time of the FID is a primary goal in recording quality NMR data. A
natural inclination might be to just increase the acquisition time to maximize the amount
of signal that is acquired (up to some “safe” limit). However, increasing the acquisition
time is only advantageous up to a point. Moreover, it will be detrimental if extended too
far. Care and forethought should be taken when adjusting ‘at’: too long and you will
acquire noise unnecessarily; too short and extraneous wiggles will show up at the base of
the peaks.
The tiny analog signal emitted from the sample (in microvolts) is amplified,
mixed, filtered, and attenuated prior to digitization, which is required for further
5
BU-CIC-12-04
computer processing. The ADC (analog-to-digital converter) converts the analog FID
into a series of discrete points along the FID signal envelope. This is the number of points
(np). In general, the more points used to define the FID, the higher resolution. The
number of points (np),
FT
Figure 3. Fourier transform of the FID for estrone acquired at 500 MHz. Note: the
spectrometer frequency you use, in general, will not be exactly 500 MHz.
spectral width (sw), and acquisition time (at) are interrelated. Changing one of these
parameters will affect the other two (see below).
6
BU-CIC-12-04
While the FID contains all the requisite information we desire, it is in a form that
we cannot readily interpret. Fourier transforming the time-domain (seconds) FID
(commonly referred to as FT or FFT for Fast Fourier Transform) will produce a
frequency domain (seconds-1) spectrum with the familiar peak shapes and intensities, as
shown in Figure 3. The frequency domain spectrum has two important parameters
associated with it; the spectrometer frequency (sfrq), discussed earlier, and the spectral
width (often times erroneously called the sweep width)(referred to as sw - see Figure 4).
It is important to remember that the spectral width in ppm is independent of the
spectrometer operating frequency; however, since the number of Hz per ppm is
dependent on the spectrometer operating frequency, the spectral width in Hz will change
depending upon the spectrometer used. For example, at a spectrometer frequency of
300 MHz, a spectral width of 3000 Hz is needed to measure a 10 ppm frequency range,
since each ppm contains 300 Hz (10 ppm x 300 Hz/ppm = 3000 Hz). At a spectrometer
frequency of 500 MHz, a spectral width of 5000 Hz is needed to measure 10 ppm (10
ppm x 500 Hz/ppm).
3000 Hz 0 Hz 5000 Hz 0 Hz
Figure 4. The spectral width in ppm and Hertz at different spectrometer frequencies.
Note the difference in the spectral width in Hertz for the two spectrometers.
The sweep width (sw), number of points (np), and the acquisition time (at) are
related by the following equations:
np
at = (1)
2sw
and
1 2sw
€ res = = (2)
at np
where ‘res’ refers to the digital resolution of the spectrum. The digital resolution is in
units of Hz/point, and the rule-of-thumb is that the digital resolution (in Hertz) should be
€
less than one half the natural peak width at half-height. This ensures that each peak is
described by at least 3 points. For example, if your peak width at half-height is 0.5 Hz,
the digital resolution should be less than 0.25 Hz. Therefore, if your spectrometer
frequency is 500 MHz, your total spectral width is 5000 Hz (10 ppm) and your required
digital resolution (res) is 0.25 Hz/point, rearranging equation 2 gives you the minimum
number of points required for adequate digital resolution:
7
BU-CIC-12-04
2sw
np = = 40,000 points (3)
res
Since the computer works most efficiently if the number of points is a power of 2,
the closest larger power of 2 would automatically be used, which, in this case, is 65,536
€
points. The spectral width, number of points, and acquisition time can be specified when
operating the spectrometer, usually by typing the appropriate mnemonic followed by an
equals sign and the numeric value (e.g. np=64000). The spectrometer will set the units
automatically. Generally, Varian’s automatically change the number of points according
to equation 2 if the acquisition time or sweep width are changed.
On Varian’s this delay time is named d1 and appears at the beginning of the pulse
sequence (see Figure 1). In practice, this delay should be thought of as coming after the
acquisition time. It is an important parameter and plays a vital role in obtaining accurate
integration. After the Rf pulse, the nuclear spins do not instantly return approach
equilibrium; rather, they each relax according to a time constant called T1 (longitudinal
relaxation time, which parameterizes any approximation of the time necessary for the
magnetization to approach the Z-axis). Individual T1 time constants are dependent on
many factors including nuclear environment, temperature, and solvent. T1’s for carbon
atoms are typically much longer than T1’s for hydrogen atoms. Since each nucleus in a
molecule is immersed in a different magnetic environment, their T1’s will not be the
same. Not allowing enough time for relaxation between pulses will cause varied
attenuation of the signals and inaccurate integration (see Integration Section for more
details). When a 90° pulse is used to excite the spins (Figure 2A), a total time (TT)
between pulses of 5xT1 is necessary in order to have nearly complete relaxation. (Z-
magnetization = (1 – e-(elapsed time/T1)), where 1 – e-5 = ~ .99326). If a pulse width less than
90° is used, the total time can be proportionally less, and intensity distortions due to
differential relaxation effects can be minimized. This is one reason why the standard
pulse width for 1D 1H NMR experiments are in the range of 25 - 45º.
The total time between measured transients is given by the following equation,
where TT is the total time and d1 is the recycle delay: TT = pw + at + d1. Since the
pulse width is in microseconds while the acquisition time and recycle delay are in
seconds, the pulse width can usually be ignored, leaving us with the equation:
TT = at + d1 (4)
The optimum recycle delay can be computed by rearranging the equation to give
€
d1 = TT − at (5)
As an example of the above, if your longest T1 is 600 msec, then the total time (where
€
8
BU-CIC-12-04
TT=5x T1) must be at least 3 seconds, to completely avoid relaxation based distortions of
signal intensity.
These six parameters provide the foundation on which all NMR experiments are
built. Appreciation of them will go far in the correct acquisition and interpretation of
your NMR spectra, thus, saving precious time and effort. This not only applies to simple
1-PULSE experiments, but also is equally important in 2-D and 3-D NMR spectroscopy.
9
BU-CIC-12-04
Applications of FT-NMR
The purpose of this section is to acquaint you with proper peak shape and the
problems that are caused by improper shimming. NMR peaks have a shape that is called
Lorentzian. A Lorentzian line can be expressed mathematically and has three
parameters: amplitude [A], width at half height in Hz [LW1/2] and position, in Hz [X0].
An example of a Lorentzian line with LW1/2 = 0.25 Hz is shown below, in Figure 5.
Xo
A(LW1/ 2 ) 2
Y=
(LW1/ 2 ) 2 + 4(X 0 − X) 2
LW1/2 A
A = Amplitude
LW1/2 = Peak width at half height, in Hz
X 0 = Peak position, in Hz
-5 -3 -1 1 3 5
Hertz €
Figure 5. Lorentzian line with LW1/2=0.25 Hz.
10
BU-CIC-12-04
influence line shape include the quality of the NMR tube, sample spinning, sample
concentration, dissolved oxygen, and paramagnetic impurities. The latter three will lead
to an overall broadening of the lines.
Shimming:
The term ‘shimming a magnet’ is a piece of NMR jargon that harks back to the
early days of NMR spectroscopy. Originally, permanent magnets were used to provide
the external magnetic field. To obtain the most homogenous field across the sample, the
pole faces of the magnet had to be perfectly aligned, and to accomplish this, small pieces
of wood, or ‘shims’, were hammered into the magnet support, so as to physically move
the poles relative to each other. Luckily, nowadays you will not be required to bring
hammer and wooden shims to the spectrometer. Shimming is accomplished by changing
the applied current for a set of coils surrounding the probe. This applied current will
create small magnetic fields in the region of your sample that will either enhance or
oppose the static magnetic field. Your goal will be to adjust these coil fields by a series of
mouse clicks to obtain the most homogeneous magnetic field across your sample, which
is usually observed as an increase in the lock signal.
It is important for you to have a basic understanding of line shape so you can
judge when: (1) your shimming is off, and (2) you need to spend more time shimming
your sample. The best way to avoid problems is to establish a procedure, such as the one
detailed below.
I. Always load a shim file that matches the current probe (e.g. probe = ‘as’ )
when you sit down at the instrument. You should never assume the
previous user left the instrument with a standard shim file loaded. Without
reloading standard shims, you will have to start where the last person
stopped - and that might include someone who shimmed for a short
sample, a bad tube, a viscous sample, etc.
II. Be aware of lock parameters, especially if you only shim on the lock
display (as most novice users will). Establish lock transmitter power and
gain levels that work for most of your samples. If you encounter a sample
that seems to require an unusually high power or gain setting, there is a
problem with your sample and/or the instrument, and shimming on the
lock level may be difficult or impossible.
III. Shimming problems are confirmed only if the problem is visible on every
peak in your spectrum. If, for example, only one peak is doubled, the
problem is sample related, and can't be shimmed away. Remember,
anomalies close to the base of intense single lines may not be visible on
less intense peaks unless the vertical scale is increased.
11
BU-CIC-12-04
patience and practice. You should always approach shimming with some
method that works for you to give acceptable results. Example: load a
shim file; adjust the lock level to a maximum with Z1, then Z2, then Z1,
then Z3, and then Z1.
V. Spinning side bands should always be below 2%. If spinning side bands
are above 2%, turn off the spinner air, optimize the X and Y shims, then
turn the spinner air back on and re-optimize Z1, Z2, and Z3. If this does not
solve the problem, consider transferring your sample to another tube.
Knowledge of correct line shape can help you correct problems such as those
shown in Figure 6. Although the peak in Figure 6b may have a line width at half-height
that is less than 0.50 Hz, it is obviously poorly shimmed. You should never accept a
poorly shimmed line shape such as is shown in Figure 6b, where a single line is expected.
On the pages that follow are some line shape defects and the shims that should be
adjusted to correct the problem. You will also notice that the FID will show the problem
as well, but may not be as easy to diagnose. In general, odd-order longitudinal shims (Zl,
Z3, Z5) affect the line shape symmetrically while even-order longitudinal shims (Z2, Z4)
cause a non-symmetrical line shape. The higher the order (Z4 is higher order than Z2), the
lower (closer to the base of the peaks) the problem is observed.
12
BU-CIC-12-04
13
BU-CIC-12-04
Figure 6. From G. Chmurny and D. Hoult, “The ancient and honorable art of shimming.”
Concepts in Magnetic Resonance, 1990, 2, 131-149.
14
BU-CIC-12-04
The ‘art’ of shimming resides in the fact that there is no single set of rules that
work for every sample, spectrometer, person, or even time of year. Personal experience
is the best and, frankly, the only way to master shimming. That being said, knowledge of
correct and incorrect line shapes will allow you to decide quickly whether your sample is
correctly shimmed. You will have to decide whether the return (a better line shape) is
worth the time spent achieving that line shape.
15
BU-CIC-12-04
Signal-to-Noise Measurement
The signal-to-noise measurement, or S/N, is an important criterion for accurate
integrations, and is also one of the best ways to determine the sensitivity of a NMR
spectrometer. In general, a higher S/N specification means that the instrument is more
sensitive. It is also useful in roughly determining the time requirement for an experiment.
Standard S/N measurements for 1H spectra are always determined using a sample of 0.1
% ethylbenzene in CDCl3 (ETB). A typical result for the Varian Inova 500 is 200:1 using
the 5mm probe. It is important that the spectrum be acquired under the following
standard conditions:
1. Use a 90 pulse.
6. One transient.
Optimum signal-to-noise for any sample is defined as that which occurs when
using a line-broadening equal to the peak width at half height. When this line broadening
is applied, the peak width at half-height doubles, i.e., it is the sum of the natural peak
width at one-half height plus the line broadening applied. The equation used for
calculating S/N is:
2.5A
S /N = (5)
N pp
16
BU-CIC-12-04
The distance between the two horizontal lines, above, in mm, is the Npp value to
be used in equation (5). Choice of a noise region must be consistently applied for
standard samples, and for 0.1 % ethylbenzene (ETB), use 5 to 3.5 ppm. S/N measurement
is an automated process and only requires choice of the appropriate window, placement
of the cursors, and typing the correct command (‘dsn’ on Varian instruments).
The signal-to-noise of a given signal increases as the square root of the number of
acquisitions; therefore, to double the signal-to-noise you must take four times as many
acquisitions. When using a concentrated sample such as 5% (w/v) menthol for 13C, or
when measuring routine 1H survey spectra, the number of scans is often quite small, so
the point discussed above may not seem important. However, suppose you are in the
following situation: you have only a few mg of research sample, and after measuring a
13
C spectrum for 2 hours, you get peaks with an S/N of only 5:1. Since the peaks are
barely visible above the noise (and you may have missed signals for any quaternary
carbon atoms), you want to re-collect the spectrum to get an S/N of 50:1, a value more
typical for 13C NMR. Unfortunately, this will take 10 * l0 * 2 = 200 hours!
At some point, you may measure a spectrum and wonder why the signals are so
weak. The majority of the time, the problem is not with the spectrometer, but with your
sample. You can test this quickly by taking a spectrum of a standard such as ETB or
menthol. In this way, you can save yourself needless frustration by identifying problems
that are due to a bad sample. It is always a good practice to measure the spectrum of a
standard, well-characterized compound before that of your unknown.
17
BU-CIC-12-04
Integration
The purpose of this section of the handout is to show you how to obtain accurate
integrals. The spectrum of 0.1 % ethylbenzene in CD2C12 is given in Figure 7. CDCl3 is
not used in this case because the solvent peak overlaps with the phenyl region and
complicates integration. If we assign an integral of 3.00 to the CH3 triplet, then the
phenyl region integrates to 4.12 protons, while the CH2 quartet integrates to 1.93 protons.
Thus, the integral for the phenyl protons is 15.6% too small, while the integral for the
CH2 quartet is off by only 3.5%. The 14.2% error for the phenyl protons is not due to
spectrometer error, it is because we have chosen parameters for acquiring the spectrum
that guarantee we will get inaccurate integrals.
The accuracy of the integrals obtained for most routine spectra is usually about
10-20%. This accuracy is sometimes sufficient, especially if you already know what the
compound is. However, this accuracy is usually not adequate to determine the exact
number of hydrogen atoms contributing to a given peak, nor is it sufficient for
quantitative applications (such as kinetics experiments or assays of product mixtures)
where one demands an accuracy of 1-2%. For example, 20% accuracy is not sufficient to
decide whether two peaks have a relative ratio of 1:3 or 1:4. Obtaining 1-2% accuracy
18
BU-CIC-12-04
can be achieved but you need to be aware of the factors that affect integrations. These are
as follows:
II. No peaks should be close to the ends of the spectrum. The spectral width
should be large enough such that no peak is within 10% of the ends of the
spectrum. This is because the spectrometer uses filters to filter out frequencies
that are outside the spectral width. Unfortunately, the filters also tend to
decrease the intensities of peaks near the ends of the spectrum. For example,
at 500 MHz, if two peaks are separated by 7 ppm, a spectral width of at least
3500 Hz is sufficient to get both peaks in the same spectrum and prevent
foldovers. However, to avoid distortion of the integral intensities because of
filter effects, the spectral width should be set 10% larger on each side, 350 Hz,
giving a total spectral width of about 4200 Hz (8.4ppm). Thus, you should be
prepared to make the spectral width larger if necessary. When in doubt, it is
best to be conservative. Hence if the peaks are separated by 3500 Hz, one can
easily set the spectral width to 6000 – 8000 Hz. With modern spectrometers,
this change puts an insignificant burden on the hardware.
III. The recycle time + the acquisition time = total time (TT) should be at least
five Tl 's. Data should be collected under conditions which ensure that all the
nuclei can fully relax before the next FID is taken. The most challenging
aspect of this criteria arises from three experimental variables. First, the
acquisition time (at), should always match the sample. If the FID “rings”
down quickly, a short value of at is fine. However, if the FID rings down
slowly, then the value of at should be long enough such that it exceeds the last
possible evidence of signal by about 50%. (You should routinely examine the
time it takes the FID to ring down using the df (display FID) command). Next
you need to consider how long T1 may be with respect to the value of at.
Note: when using a relatively long value at, with T1 values that are not very
long, means that you can use a relatively modest d1 value and still enjoy
nearly complete relaxation before the next pulse occurs. However, this is
rarely the case. Hence, in contradistinction, in the case of 0.1 % ethylbenzene
in CD2C12, where the longest Tl of interest is 9.8 sec (phenyl hydrogen
atoms), so the TT when using a 90º pulse width should be 49 seconds. Even
for a relatively long value of at (e.g. up to 6 – 10 seconds), a very long value
of d1 will be necessary to obtain accurate integrals.
IV. The spectrum should have a S/N of at least 250:1 for the smallest peak to be
integrated. Usually if you cannot see any baseline noise, you probably have
close to the required S/N for accurate integrals.
19
BU-CIC-12-04
VII. The same area should be included or excluded for all peaks. For example, all
peak integrals should be measured +/- 5 Hz around each peak, not +/- 20 Hz
around one peak, +/- 10 Hz around a second peak, etc. Spinning sidebands are
included in this category, and should consistently be either included or
excluded.
With these points in mind, let’s take the 1H spectrum of ethylbenzene again. The
major factor for poor integration in Figure 7 was the difference in T1’s for the aromatic
20
BU-CIC-12-04
protons (~12 seconds) and the aliphatic protons (~7 seconds). With no recycle delay,
there was not enough time to allow for complete relaxation. If we allow for complete
relaxation by setting d1 large enough, say 60 seconds, then integration becomes accurate
as shown in Figure 8 with only a 0.2% error of the aromatic protons.
21
BU-CIC-12-04
Homonuclear Decoupling
Figure 9. Proton spectrum of 0.1% ethylbenzene in CDCl3 taken on a Varian Unity 400
MHz spectrometer. The lower trace is the full, coupled spectrum. The upper inset shows
that by centering the decoupler on the triplet the quartet is collapsed to a singlet, while
the lower inset demonstrates the effects of irradiating the quartet.
22
BU-CIC-12-04
As a general rule-of-thumb, you will need a second Rf field that has a frequency that is
about 10 times larger than the coupling constant you are attempting to collapse. For
example, if you what to collapse a 15 Hz coupling constant, you will need a B1 field that
is about 150 Hz in magnitude. This is precisely why understanding how to convert a 90°
pulse width obtained at a particular value of tpwr, is essential to properly setting up a
double-resonance experiment. (Note: exactly the same requirement exists when setting
up a one-dimensional nOe experiment.) In this example, the soft irradiation on the single
signal would be at a value of tpwr corresponding to 1/150 Hz = ~6700 µs for the 360°
pulse-width, or about 1670 µs for the 90° pulse-width. Note: in practice to “deliver” this
much power will sometimes require a modest increase in the setting of the value of tpwr
(typically about +5 – +10 dB) because of the necessity of periodically interrupting the
irradiation when each data point is recorded during the FID (this interruption is called
“time-shared-decoupling”).
Homonuclear decoupling is a fast and effective way to establish that two nuclei
are spin (scalar, ‘J’) coupled, and can be used to simplify a complex coupling pattern for
further analysis. It is also useful as a follow-up to a COSY experiment to confirm specific
couplings. To obtain definitive data the two signals should be separated by at least 0.5
ppm. It is also important to note that other signals close to the irradiation point may
experience a displacement in their chemical shift due to the decoupling field. This
displacement in the chemical shift is called a Bloch-Siegert shift and can be used to
measure the decoupling field strength.
23
BU-CIC-12-04
1
H Decoupled 13C NMR spectra (13C-{1H})
The purpose of this section of the handout is to give you some useful information
about C-{1H} NMR spectroscopy. Since only about 1 in 100 carbon atoms are the NMR
13
active isotope (1.10% are the NMR active 13C), any means to improve S/N is essential.
Splitting of the 13C resonances as a result of coupling to attached hydrogen atoms will
result in decreased S/N and is, thus, undesirable. Therefore, 13C NMR spectra are
typically run 1H decoupled. The symbol 13C-{1H} is used to denote this and implies the
13
C nucleus is observed while the 1H nuclei are being irradiated, thus decoupling them
from the 13C nuclei. A typical 13C-{1H} spectrum (5% menthol in acetone-d6) is shown in
Figure 10.
This is a double resonance experiment with the observed nucleus (13C) and
decoupled nucleus (1H) on separate Rf channels. This experiment is called heteronuclear
decoupling, and is another type of ‘1-PULSE’ experiment, as described in the Basics
section, with the addition of a decoupling field, as shown in Figure 11. It is the
heteronuclear version of the homodecoupling experiment with the exception that
broadband saturation (as opposed to selective saturation) is used.
24
BU-CIC-12-04
When acquiring spectra of nuclei other than 1H (so called ‘X- nuclei’) it is important to
remember the following considerations:
25
BU-CIC-12-04
Figure 12. A gated decoupling pulse sequence for 13C-{1H} acquisition that has no nOe
enhancement. Note that the decoupler channel (Dec) is only ‘on’ during segment C,
which is the pulse and acquisition time. Compare to Figure 11.
II. T1 relaxation times: The Tl's of l3C nuclei are in general longer than those
found for hydrogen atoms, as shown below in Figure 13. Therefore, you
may have to wait very long times if you want accurate integrals from
spectra. For example, from Figure 13, quantitative integration of
ethylbenzene would require a total acquisition time (TT) of 5*36 seconds or
3 minutes per scan! A paramagnetic relaxation agent such as Cr(acac)
(available from Aldrich) can be used to shorten the Tl's, but can sometimes
be difficult to separate from the compound. Note that the quaternary carbon
atoms have considerably longer T1’s and, as a result, typically have much
smaller signals than other carbon atoms.
26
BU-CIC-12-04
14 7 16
CH2 -CH3 CH3 NO2
36 38 56
13 20 6.9 8.7 6.6 5.7 4.8
(CH3-CH2 -CH2-CH2 )2
13 21 6.9
9 15 4.9
13
Figure 13. Examples of some representative C NMR T1 values, in seconds.
13
C NMR Take Home Lesson
27
BU-CIC-12-04
13
C-{1H} DEPT Spectra
rate for a DEPT experiment. 1H T1’s can be significantly shorter than that of 13C and
especially short compared to 15N and 29Si, which allows you to acquire more scans per
unit time than the X-{1H} experiment and thus obtain improved S/N. A further
advantage of this population transfer is the ability to perform multiplicity editing.
28
BU-CIC-12-04
By varying the length of the last 1H pulse (mult*pp) from 45 to 135º degrees, the
multiplicity of the 13C or X nucleus can be determined (i.e. depending on the pulse, the
signal for a methine, methylene, or methyl carbon atoms will either be a positive,
negative, or null signal, see table below). Remember, since quaternary carbon atoms have
no attached hydrogen atoms, they will show no signal. Also, the signal from the
deuterated solvent will be absent. An example of a DEPT135 experiment is shown in
Figure 15. Compare it to Figure 10. In general, you can run DEPT on most samples
without additional calibration.
If you obtain less than favorable results, calibration of the polarization pulse (pp on the
Decoupler channel) can be performed. This is typically done using a DEPT-90, arraying
pp, and looking for a maximum in the methine signal without contributions from other
carbon atoms.
29
BU-CIC-12-04
DEPT is an effective means of determining 13C multiplicity that, when combined with
other NMR spectra and other experimental techniques (MS, FT-IR, etc.), can be an
invaluable tool for the analysis of unknown compounds.
30