1 Lineartransformations: Linear Transformation
1 Lineartransformations: Linear Transformation
1 Lineartransformations: Linear Transformation
Prasad, IITG
Class Notes for the Lectures on the Topic of Linear Transformations (MA102)
1 LinearTransformations
Definition 1.1. Let V and W be vector spaces over the field F . A linear transformation
from V into W is a function T : V → W such that
Examples:
• Let V and W be vector spaces over the field F . The Zero Tranformation 0 : V → W
defined by 0v = 0 for all v ∈ V , is a linear transformaton from V into W .
• Let V be a vector space over the field F . The Identity Transformation I : V → V
defined I(v) = v for all v ∈ V is a linear transformtion from V into V .
• Let P denote the vector space of all real polynomials over the real field. Let P (x) =
a0 + a1 x + a2 x2 + · · · + an xn ∈ P. Define a map T : P → P by
d
(T P )(x) = (P (x)) = a1 +2a2 x+· · ·+nan xn−1 for all x ∈ R, for each P ∈ P .
dx
Then, T is a linear transformation from P into P and it called differential transfor-
mation / operator.
• Let A be a fixed m × n matrix with entries in the field R. The function T : Rn → Rm
defined by T x = Ax for x = (x1 , . . . , xn )T ∈ Rn is a linear transformation from Rn
into Rm . The function S : Rm → Rn defined by Sx = xA for x = (x1 , . . . , xm ) ∈ Rm
is a linear transformation from Rm into Rn .
• Let C(R) = {f : R → R : f is continuous on R} denote the vector space of all con-
tinuous functions from R into R over the real field. Define T : C(R) → C(R) by
Z x
(T f ) (x) = f (t) dt for all x ∈ R, for each f ∈ C(R) .
0
Then T is a linear transformation from C(R) into C(R). The function T f is not only
continuous but it has a continuous derivative.
Page No. 1
Lecture Notes by M. G. P. Prasad, IITG
• Let P denote the vector space of all real polynomials over the real field. Let P (x) =
a0 + a1 x + a2 x2 + · · · + an xn ∈ P. Define a map T : P → R by
(T P )(x) = P (3) for all x ∈ R, for each P ∈ P .
Then, T is a linear transformation from P into R.
Theorem 1.1. Let V and W be vector spaces over the field F . Let T be a linear transfro-
mation from V into W . Then
1. T (0) = 0.
2. T (−v) = −v for all v ∈ V .
3. T (u − v) = T u − T v for all u ∈ V and v ∈ V .
Proof.
Proof of (1):
Observe that
T (0) = T (0 + 0) = T (0) + T (0) (by Linearity property)
This gives that,
T (0) − T (0) = T (0) =⇒ 0 = T (0) .
Proof of (2):
Observe that for any vector v ∈ V ,
T (v) + T (−v) = T (v + (−v)) = T (0) = 0 .
Proof of (3):
Observe that for all u ∈ V and v ∈ V ,
T (u − v) = T (u + (−v)) = T (u) + T (−v) = T (u) + (−1)T (v) = T u − T v .
Page No. 2
Lecture Notes by M. G. P. Prasad, IITG
Theorem 1.2. Let V be finite dimensional vector space over the field F with dim (V ) = n.
Let B = {u1 , u2 , . . . , un } be an (ordered) basis for V . Let W be a vector space over the
same field F and let u1 , . . ., un be arbitrary vectors in W . There there is a unique linear
transformation T : V → W such that T (ui ) = wi for all i = 1, 2, . . ., n.
Define a map T : V → W by
n n
!
X X
T (v) = αi wi for each v = αi ui ∈V .
i=1 i=1
Observe that T is well defined, because for each vector v, its coordinates [v]B = (α1 , . . . , αn )
with respect to the ordered basis B is unique.
Further T satisfies T (ui ) = wi for i = 1, 2, . . ., n.
Claim: T is linear
Let u = α1 u1 + α2 u2 + · · · + αn un and v = β1 u1 + β2 u2 + · · · + βn un be any two vectors in
V and let a and b any two scalars in F . Then
Now,
T (au + bv) = T ((aα1 + bβ1 ) u1 + · · · + (aαn + bβn ) un )
= (aα1 + bβ1 ) w1 + · · · + (aαn + bβn ) wn
= aα1 w1 + · · · + aαn wn + bβ1 w1 + · · · + bβn wn
= a (α1 w1 + · · · + αn wn ) + b (β1 w1 + · · · + βn wn )
= aT (u) + bT (v) .
Claim: T is unique
Let S be a linear transformation from V to W such that S(ui ) = wi for i = 1, 2, . . ., n.
For the vector v = ni=1 αi ui , we have
P
n
!
X
S(v) = S αi ui
i=1
n
X
= αi S(ui )
i=1
Page No. 3
Lecture Notes by M. G. P. Prasad, IITG
n
X
= αi w i
i=1
so that S is exactly the rule T which we defined above. This shows that the linear trans-
formation T with T (ui ) = wi for each i is unique.
This completes the proof.
Note: The above theorem shows that a linear transformation is completely determined by
its action on any basis of domain. One can see it in the following example.
Therefore
T (v) = T (x, y) = T (xe1 + ye2 ) = xT (e1 ) + yT (e2 ) = x(0, 1, 2) + y ((3/2), (1/2), (−1/2))
Example: Let P2 (R) denote the vector space of all real polynomials of degree atmost 2
over the real field. Let T be a linear transformation T : R2 → P2 (R) such that T (1, 0) =
Page No. 4
Lecture Notes by M. G. P. Prasad, IITG
Definition 1.2. Let V and W be vector spaces over the field F and let T be a linear
transformation from V into W . Then, the range space of T , denoted by range (T ) and the
kernel of T , denoted by ker (T ) are defined as
Kernel of T = ker (T ) = {v ∈ V : T v = 0} .
Proof.
Since T (0) = 0, we have 0 ∈ ker(T ) and hence the kernel of T is non-empty.
Let v1 and v2 be any two vectors in the kernel of T and let c be any scalar in F .
To show: cv1 + v2 is in the kernel of T
Since v1 ∈ ker (T ), we have T (v1 ) = 0. Similarly, since v2 ∈ ker (T ), we have T (v2 ) = 0.
Now,
T (cv1 + v2 ) = c T (v1 ) + T (v2 ), since T is linear
=c0 + 0 = 0.
Therefore, cv1 + v2 ∈ ker (T ). Thus, the kernel of T is a subspace of V .
This completes the proof.
Theorem 1.4. Let V and W be vector spaces over the field F and let T be a linear
transformation from V into W . Then, the range space of T is a subspace of W . That is,
range (T ) 4 W .
Proof.
Since T (0) = 0, we have 0 ∈ range(T ) and hence the range of T is non-empty.
Let w1 and w2 be any two vectors in the range of T and let c be any scalar in F .
To show: cw1 + w2 is in the range of T
Page No. 5
Lecture Notes by M. G. P. Prasad, IITG
Definition 1.3. Let V and W be vector spaces over the field F and let T be a linear
transformation from V into W . Assume that V is finite-dimensional. Then the rank of T
is the dimension of the range space of T and the nullity of T is the dimension of the kernel
(or null space) of T .
Example: Let P3 denote the vector space of all real polynomials of degree atmost 3 over
the real field. Let T : P3 → P3 be the linear transformation defined by (T P )(x) = P 0 (x).
Fine the rank and nullity of T .
Oberve that any polynomial P (x) = a0 + a1 x + a2 x2 ∈ P2 can be written as
d a1 a2
P (x) = a0 + a1 x + a2 x2 = a0 x + x 2 + x 3 .
dx 2 3
The range of T is all of P2 and hence the rank of T is the dimension of P2 which is equal
to 3.
The kernel of T is given by
ker (T ) = {P ∈ P3 : T (P ) = P 0 is a zero polynomial } = {All constant polynomials } .
Therefore, the nullity of T is 1.
Exercise: Read and understand Examples 6.61, 6.62, 6.65, 6.66 in David Poole’s Book
(4th Edition).
Page No. 6
Lecture Notes by M. G. P. Prasad, IITG
Page No. 7
Lecture Notes by M. G. P. Prasad, IITG
It gives that
c1 v1 + · · · + ck vk − ck+1 vk+1 − · · · − cn vn = 0 .
Since B is a basis for V , it follows that c1 = · · · = cn = 0. In particular, ck+1 = · · · = cn =
0. Therefore C is linearly independent.
Since C is a basis for the range of T , it follows that the rank of T is equal to (n − k).
Example: Let V be the vector space of all symmetric 2 × 2 real matrices over the real
field. Let P2 denote the vector space of all real polynomials of degree atmost 2 over the
real field. Define a linear transformation T : V → P2 by
a b
T = (a − b) + (b − c)x + (c − a)x2 .
b c
a b a b
ker (T ) = : T =0
b c b c
a b 2
= : (a − b) + (b − c)x + (c − a)x = 0 for all x ∈ R
b c
a b
= : (a − b) = (b − c) = (c − a) = 0
b c
a b
= : a=b=c
bc
c c
= : c∈R
c c
1 1
= span
1 1
1 1
Therefore, is a basis for the kernel of T and hence the nullity of T is 1.
1 1
Observe that the dimension of V is 3.
By the Rank-Nullity theorem, it follows that
Page No. 8
Lecture Notes by M. G. P. Prasad, IITG
Exercise: Read and understand Example 6.67 in David Poole’s Book (4th Edition).
We remind that L(V, W ) is defined only when V and W are vector spaces over the same
field.
In case of L(V, V ), we simply write it as L(V ).
If V is a vector space over the field F then a linear tranformation T : V → V from V into
V itself is called a linear operator on V .
If V is a vector space over the field F then a linear tranformation f : V → F from the
vector space V into the field F is called a linear functional on V .
Theorem 1.6. Let V be an n-dimensional vector space over the field F and let W be an
m-dimensional vector space over the (same) field F . Then, the vector space L(V, W ) is
finite-dimensional and has dimension mn.
Definition 1.4. Let V and W be vector spaces over the field F and let T : V → W be a
function from V into W .
The function T : V → W is said to be one-to-one (or one-one or injective) if T maps
distinct vectors in V to distinct vectors in W .
The function T : V → W is said to be onto (or surjective) if the range of T is equal to W .
The function T : V → W is said to be bijective if T is both one-to-one and onto.
Page No. 9
Lecture Notes by M. G. P. Prasad, IITG
Example 1: Let T : R2 → R3 be defined by T ([x, y]T ) = [2x, (x − y), 0]T for each
[x, y]T ∈ R2 .
First observe that if T ([x1 , y1 ]T ) = T ([x2 , y2 ]T ) then [x1 , y1 ]T = [x2 , y2 ]T .
Suppose that
2x1 2x2
T ([x1 , y1 ]T ) = T ([x2 , y2 ]T ) =⇒ (x1 − y1 ) = (x2 − y2 ) .
0 0
This gives that 2x1 = 2x2 and (x1 − y1 ) = (x2 − y2 ). Solving these equations, we see that
x1 = x2 and y1 = y2 . Therefore, [x1 , y1 ]T = [x2 , y2 ]T .
Thus, T is one-to-one.
Observe that [0, 0, 1]T ∈ R3 , but there is no vector [x, y]T ∈ R2 such that T ([x, y]T ) =
[0, 0, 1]T . Therefore, T is NOT onto.
Observe that P (x) = x3 and Q(x) = x3 + 1 are mapped by T to the same polynomial
R(x) = 3x2 . Therefore T is NOT one-to-one.
Therefore T is one-to-one.
Observe that for each A ∈ M2 , there exists B = AT such that T (B) = (AT )T = A.
Page No. 10
Lecture Notes by M. G. P. Prasad, IITG
Therefore, T is onto.
Proof.
Proof of ⇒:
Given that T is one-to-one. To show: ker (T ) = {0}.
If v ∈ ker (T ) then T (v) = 0.
We also know that T (0) = 0. Therefore T (v) = T (0).
Since T is one-to-one, T (v) = T (0) implies that v = 0.
Therefore, ker (T ) = {0}.
Proof of ⇐:
Given that ker (T ) = {0}. To show: T is one-to-one.
Let u and v be in V such that T (u) = T (v). To show: u = v.
Now,
T (u − v) = T (u) − T (v) = 0 =⇒ u − v ∈ ker (T ) .
Since ker (T ) = {0}, we get
(u − v) = 0 =⇒ u=v.
Theorem 1.8. Let V and W be finite-dimensional vector spaces over the field F . Suppose
that dim (V ) = dim (W ). Then T is one-to-one if and only if T is onto.
Proof.
Given that dim (V ) = dim (W ) = n (say).
Proof of ⇒:
Also given that T : V → W is one-to-one. To show: T is onto.
Since T is one-to-one, by previous theorem, it follows that ker (T ) = {0} and hence the
nullity of T is 0.
Then, by Rank-Nullity Theorem, it follows that
Proof of ⇐:
Page No. 11
Lecture Notes by M. G. P. Prasad, IITG
Theorem 1.9. Let V and W be finite-dimensional vector spaces over the field F . If
dim (V ) > dim (W ), then any linear transformation T : V → W is NOT one-to-one
(injective).
Proof.
Given that dim (V ) > dim (W ).
To show: Any linear map T : V → W is not one-to-one.
We know that range (T ) 4 W and hence rank (T ) ≤ dim (W ). It gives that −rank (T ) ≥
−dim (W ).
We know that
nullity (T ) = dim (V ) − rank (T ) ≥ dim (V ) − dim (W ) > 0 .
Since nullity (T ) > 0, the kernel of T must contain vectors other than 0 and hece T can
not be one-to-one.
Theorem 1.10. Let V and W be finite-dimensional vector spaces over the field F . If
dim (V ) < dim (W ), then any linear transformation T : V → W is NOT onto (surjective).
Proof. Given that dim (V ) < dim (W ).
To show: Any linear map T : V → W is not onto.
We know that
rank (T ) = dim (V ) − nullity (T )
≤ dim (V )
< dim (W )
Since rank (T ) < dim (W ), the subspace range (T ) is a proper subset of W and hence T is
not onto.
Theorem 1.11. Let V and W be vector spaces over the field F and let T : V → W be a
one-to-one linear transformation. If S = {v1 , v2 , . . . , vk } is a linearly independent set in V
then T (S) = {T (v1 ), T (v2 ), . . . , T (vk )} is a linearly independent set in W .
Page No. 12
Lecture Notes by M. G. P. Prasad, IITG
Proof.
Let c1 , . . ., ck be scalars such that
c1 T (v1 ) + · · · + ck T (vk ) = 0 .
(c1 v1 + · · · + ck vk ) = 0 .
c1 = · · · = ck = 0 .
Corollary 1.1. Let V and W be finite-dimensional vector spaces over the field F with
dim (V ) = dim (W ). Let T : V → W be a one-to-one linear transformation. Then T maps
a basis for V to a basis for W .
Proof.
Given that dim (V ) = dim (W ) = n (say).
Let B = {v1 , . . . , vn } be a basis for V .
To show: T (B) = {T (v1 ), . . . , T (vn )} is a basis for W .
Since B is a basis for V , B = {v1 , . . . , vn } is a linearly independent set in V .
Then, by previous theorem, it follows that T (B) = {T (v1 ), . . . , T (vn )} is a linearly inde-
pendent set in W .
Since dim (W ) = n and T (B) is a linearly independent set in W having n elements, we
get span (T (B) = W .
Therefore, T (B) is a basis for W .
Page No. 13
Lecture Notes by M. G. P. Prasad, IITG
Since dim (P1 (R)) = 2, range (T ) 4 P1 (R) and rank (T ) = 2, it follows that P1 (R) =
range (T ).
Therefore, T (B) = {T (e1 ) = 1 + x, T (e2 ) = x} is a basis for P1 (R).
Definition 1.5. Let f : V → W be a function from a vector space V into a vector space
W . If there exists a function g : W → V such that f (g(w)) = w for every w ∈ W and
g(f (v)) = v for every v ∈ V , then we say that f is invertible and the function g is called
the inverse of f . The inverse of f is unique and it is denoted by f −1 .
Theorem 1.12. Let V and W be vector spaces over the field F and let T : V → W be a
linear transformation. Then, T is invertible if and only if T is both one-to-one and onto.
Definition 1.6. Let V and W be vector spaces over the field F . A linear transformation
T : V → W is an isomorphism if T is both one-to-one and onto (that is, T is bijective).
Definition 1.7. Let V and W be vector spaces over the (same) field F . Then we say that
V is isomorphic to W if there exists a linear transformation T : V → W which is both
one-to-one and onto (that is, T is an isomorphism).
If V is isomorphic to W , then we write it as V ∼
= W.
Theorem 1.13. Let V and W be vector spaces over the (same) field F . Then, V is
isomorphic to W if and only if dim (V ) = dim (W ).
Theorem 1.14. Every n-dimensional vector space over the field F is isomorphic to the
vector space F n over the field F .
Theorem 1.15. Every n-dimensional vector space over the real field R is isomorphic to
the vector space Rn over the real field R.
Theorem 1.16. Let V be a finite-dimensional vector space over the field F . Let T : V → V
be a linear operator on V . Then the following statements are equivalent:
1. T is an isomorphism.
2. T is one-to-one.
3. T is onto.
4. ker (T ) = {0}.
5. range (T ) = V .
Page No. 14
Lecture Notes by M. G. P. Prasad, IITG
where the scalars a1j , a2j , . . ., amj being the coordinates of T vj in the ordered basis C .
That is,
a1j
a2j
T vj C = . . j = 1, 2, . . . , n .
.
amj
Define an m × n matrix A by
A = T v1 C T v2 C · · · T vn C .
That is, A is formed by putting j-th column as T vj C . The above matrix A is called the
matrix of T with respect to the ordered bases B and C and it is denoted by
T C ←B .
T
v −→ T (v)
y y
T C ←B
v B −→ T (v) C
Page No. 15
Lecture Notes by M. G. P. Prasad, IITG
Theorem 2.1. Let V be an n-dimensional vector space over the field F and let W be an
m-dimensional vector space over the (same) field F . Let B = {v1 , . . . , vn } be an ordered
basis for V and C = {w1 , . . . , wm } be an ordered basis for W . If T : V → W is a linear
transformation from V into W , then the m × n matrix defined by
T C ←B = T v1 C T v2 C · · · T vn C (1)
satisfies
T (v) C = T C ←B v B (2)
for every vector v in V .
Moreover the matrix T C ←B given in (1) is the only matrix with the property (2).
Remark: In the above theorem, if V = W and B = C , then the matrix T B←B is simply
written as T B .
Let B = {v1 = (1, 0, 0), v2 = (0, 1, 0), v3 = (0, 0, 1)} be the ordered basis for R3 and let
C = {w1 = (0, 1), w2 = (1, 0)} be the ordered basis for R 2 . Find the matrix of T with
respected to the ordered bases B and C . Also verify previous theorem for v = [1, 3, −2]T .
Step 1: Computing T vj for j = 1, . . ., n
Page No. 16
Lecture Notes by M. G. P. Prasad, IITG
Therefore
x
1 1 −3 x + y − 3z
T (v) C = T C ←B v B = y = .
1 −2 0 x − 2y C
z B
Observe that
1
[v]B = 3 ,
−2
10
T (v) C = .
−5
Using all these facts, we confirm that
1
1 1 −3 10
T C ←B v B = 3 = = T (v) C .
1 −2 0 −5
−2
Step 2: Finding the coordinates of Dvj , ∀j with respect to the ordered basis B
0 1 0 0
0 0
2 , 0 .
2
3
D(1) B = 0
, D(x) B
= ,
0 D(x ) B
= 0 D(x ) B
= 3
0 0 0 0
Step 3: Forming the matrix D B
Page No. 17
Lecture Notes by M. G. P. Prasad, IITG
By (1),
0 1 0 0
0 0 2 0
D B =
0
.
0 0 3
0 0 0 0
Find the matrix of T with respect to the ordered bases B and C . Find T (v) C for every
v ∈ V = R2 .
Step 1: Computing T ej for each j
Step 2: Finding the coordinates of T ej for each j with respect to the ordered basis C
1 0
T (e1 ) C = , T (e2 ) C = .
0 −1
Step 3: Forming the matrix T C ←B
By (1),
1 0
T C ←B = T e1 C T e2 C = .
0 −1
Step 4: Finding T (v) C for every v ∈ V = R2
x
Let v = (x1 , x2 ) ∈ V = R . Then v B = 1 .
2
x2
By (2),
1 0 x1 x1
T (v) C = T C ←B v B = = .
0 −1 x2 −x2
Cross Verfication:
x1 x1 + x2 1 −1
T = = x1 + (−x2 ) = x1 w1 + (−x2 )w2 .
x2 x1 − x2 1 1
Exercise: Let C denote the set of all complex numbers forming a vector space over the real
field R. Let T : C → C be a linear transformation defined by T (z) = i z for every z ∈ C.
Page No. 18
Lecture Notes by M. G. P. Prasad, IITG
Theorem 2.2. Let V and W be two vector spaces over the field F with ordered bases B
and C respectively. T : V → W and S : V → W be two linear transformations.
Let
Let T C ←B and S C ←B denote the matrices of T and S respectively with respect to the
ordered bases B and C .
Example: Let V = R2 be the vector space with the ordered basis B = {v1 = (1, 0), v2 =
(0, 1)}. Let W = R2 be the vector space with the ordered basis C = {w1 = (1, 1), w2 =
(−1, 1)}.
Let T : V → W be the linear transformation defined by T (x1 , x2 ) = ((x1 + x2 ), (x1 − x2 )).
Let S : V → W be the linear transformation defined by S(x1 , x2 ) = (x2 , x1 ).
Let c be a fixed real number.
Then cT + S : V → W is a linear transformation given by
Theorem 2.3. Let U , V and W be three vector spaces over the field F with ordered bases
B, C and D respectively. Let T : U → V and S : V → W be two linear transformations.
Then the composition (S ◦ T ) = S(T (u)) for every u ∈ U is a linear transformation from
U to W .
Page No. 19
Lecture Notes by M. G. P. Prasad, IITG
Let T C ←B denote the matrix of T with respect to the ordered bases B and C .
Let S D←C denote the matrix of S with respect to the ordered bases C and D.
Let S ◦ T D←B denote the matrix of the linear transformation S ◦ T with respect to the
ordered bases B and D.
Then,
S ◦ T D←B = S D←C T C ←B .
Proof.
Let the ordered basis B for U be given by B = {u1 , . . . , up }.
We have
S ◦ T D←B = (S ◦ T )u1 D · · · (S ◦ T )up D .
Now, the i-th column of S ◦ T D←B is
(S ◦ T )ui D = S(T (ui )) D
= S D←C T (ui ) C
= S D←C T C ←B ui B
= S D←C T C ←B ei
which is the i-th column of S D←C T C ←B .
This completes the proof.
Example:
Let U = R2 be the vector space with the ordered basis B = {u1 = (0, 1), u2 = (1, 0)}.
Let V = R2 be the vector space with the ordered basis B = {v1 = (1, 0), v2 = (0, 1)}.
Let W = R2 be the vector space with the ordered basis C = {w1 = (1, 1), w2 = (−1, 1)}.
Let T : U → V be the linear transformation defined by T (x1 , x2 ) = ((x1 + x2 ), (x1 − x2 )).
Let S : V → W be the linear transformation defined by S(x1 , x2 ) = (x2 , x1 ).
Then S ◦ T : U → W is a linear transformation given by
Exercise: Read and understand Example 6.81 in David Poole’s Book (4th Edition).
Page No. 20
Lecture Notes by M. G. P. Prasad, IITG
For the sake of simplicity, we shall consider this question only for linear operators T :
V → V on a finite dimensional vecto space V , so that we can use a single ordered basis B
for domain space and co-domain/ range space.
Let V be a finite dimensional vector space over the field F . Let B ={u1 , . . . ,un} and
C = {v1 , . . . , vn } be two ordered bases for V . How are the matrices T B and T C are
related?
Theorem 2.4. Let V be a finite dimensional vector space over the field F . Let B =
{u1 , . . . , un } and C = {v1 , . . . , vn } be two ordered bases for V . Let T : V → V be a linear
operator on V . If
P = P 1 P2 · · · Pn
is an n × n matrix with columns
Pj = vj B for j = 1, 2, . . . , n ,
then
T C = P −1 T B P .
Example:
Let T : R2 → R2 be the linear operator defined by T (x1 , x2 ) = (x1 , 0). Let B = {u1 =
(1, 0), u2 = (0, 1)} be the standard ordered basis for R 2 and let C =
{v1 = (1, 1), v2 =
2 −1
(2, 1)} be another ordered basis for R . Then verify T C = P T B P.
Answer:
1 2 −1 −1 2
P = and P = .
1 1 1 −1
1 0
T B= .
0 0
−1 −2
T C = .
1 2
Page No. 21
Lecture Notes by M. G. P. Prasad, IITG
Exercises: In every lecture slides (PDF file) uploaded in the moodle course webpage of
MA102, several exercises are given towrds end (last few slides) and solve all those exer-
cises/ problems.
v = x1 v1 + x2 v2 + · · · + xn vn .
Then T
x = x1 x2 · · · xn
is called the coordinates of v with respect to the ordered basis B and it is denoted by [v]B .
Properties:
Define a map B : F n → V by
B(x1 , . . . , xn ) = x1 v1 + · · · + xn vn .
• B is a linear transformation.
• B is bijective.
S(v) = [v]B .
Then,
Page No. 22
Lecture Notes by M. G. P. Prasad, IITG
• S is a linear transformation.
• S is bijective.
• S is the inverse of B.
• S is an isomorphism.
Page No. 23