Good Person of Szechwan by Bertolt Brecht
Good Person of Szechwan by Bertolt Brecht
Good Person of Szechwan by Bertolt Brecht
Ed III Year
English II (O3.1)
Task: Assignment
Topic : Concept of goodness discussed in the play “The Good Person of Szechwan”
The Good Woman of Setzuan, drama, by Bertolt Brecht,produced in 1943 and published in 1953 as Der gute Mensch von
Sezuan. The title has many English-language variants, including The Good Person of Szechwan and The Good Soul of
Szechuan. The play is set in China between World War I and World War II.'Brecht's dark, dazzling world-view...makes an
The play is fuelled by the brilliant perception that everyone requires such a dual or split personality to survive. 'Three
gods come to earth hoping to discover one really good person. No one can be found until they meet Shen Te, a prostitute
with a heart of gold.Brecht's parable of good and evil was first performed in 1943 and remains one of his most popular
Brecht’s The Good Person of Szechwan, first performed in 1943 in Switzerland, revolves around the character of Shen
Teh/Shui Ta, playing on the idea of goodness. Shen Teh is good, or at least that is what one is supposed to see her
as, and Shui Ta is bad. The definition of goodness that the play attempts to project then depends upon the reaction of
the audience to the action on stage, based on their subjective perceptions of it. Wang the water-seller opens the play
with the Prologue, searching for lodgings for the Gods that have descended upon the city of Szechwan to search for
goodness.
Shen Teh the town prostitute agrees to offer it. The Gods perceive it as a sure sign of goodness, and give her a thousand
silver dollars as a compensation for their lodging. She uses this money to buy herself a tobacconist’s shop. Running the
shop and staying «good» turns out to be trickier than she imagined, and the shop soon turns into a poorhouse that
the name of morality, but in that of the victims». The flawed system has turned most characters into victims of a
capitalistic world. As far as the mainstream notions are concerned, Shen Teh is «good». Shen Teh dons the costume of a
man, turning into her fictional cousin Shui Ta, to shield herself against all that.
This protagonist, who is the site of both good, and the evil, problematizes the very notions of goodness, the notions of
what it is the Gods were looking for. As McCollough observes,«we should recognize that what the Gods mean by
goodness is something more than good actions». They seem to have only an abstract notion of goodness, only a hunch
about what they are looking for. These Gods get black eyes from being a part of a human brawl, lose their legs in
They get exhausted, and show symptoms of prolonged travel and other nasty human experiences. Brecht seems to be
using these Gods to problematize the concept of religion. The idea of goodness is then one that has been isolated, and
the characters as well as the audience are left grappling with it.
A water-seller by profession, he seems to have a soft spot for Shen Teh. Seemingly the only "good" person in the
play, who never takes an "evil" stand, he fails to impress the Gods. " "How they’d all shout give me water/ How they’d
fight for my good graces/ And I’d make their further treatment/ Go by how I liked their faces. The names, of the people
and that of the town, are suggestive of the setting being Chinese.
But the semi-Europeanized setting of the play point that the play is set in Brecht’s "here and now". While on one hand it
seems to be an abstract for a setting where rampant exploitation occurs, on the other it seems a signifier of success and
prosperity, pre-dating even the onset of capitalism, as Kumar notes. "What has business to do with an upright and
honorable life?" asks the First God in the second Interlude. Having opened a factory in Mr. Shu Fu’s place, Shui Ta is the
The tobacco factory he establishes is a success in terms of making him money, and thus cementing his social place. The
idea of goodness here is then not directly critiqued, but critiqued by the audience’s reaction to the action on
stage. "Brecht’s techniques are geared to hold a mirror to our face showing us how capitalism makes us do things that
we can not ethically do in the name of survival". Watching these characters fight for survival, "the spectators are no
longer in any way allowed to submit to an experience by means of uncritical empathy with the characters in a play," says
Brecht.
As Peter Brooker notes in his essay Key Words in Brecht’s Theory and Practice of Theatre,Brecht’s theatre represents
that the "puzzles of the world are not solved but shown".Brecht, unlike the common tendency which has been to empty
gest of any social content,places the social context in the gest, in the gestures. He seems, as Brooker notes, to be aiming
at a socially situated performance, rather than at penetrating a character’s inner life. He doesn’t care if Shen Teh is a
prostitute, he cares only about the social implications it would generate for the play.
Gestus, and Verfremdung then historicize the incidents portrayed, producing a jolt of surprise and illumination as "the
familiar and predictable" were not only seen afresh but "seen through". Arguably the most philosophical song in the
play, it exposes a Marxist-leftist point of view, projecting oppression as a never ending cycle, linked here specifically to
socio-economic frameworks. These resources are unequally divided, with the rich having a lot more than they would
ever need, and the poor struggling to survive. It is this imbalance that causes the problems in a society, and which has
Not only does it speak for a sense of ‘divide and rule’ amongst people where solidarity must rather exist, but also of a
sense of betrayal in an environment where everyone is watching only their own back. This aims to raise serious
questions about the ideals of "goodness" and the meaning of it, by alienating the audience/reader. The play keeps the
audience/reader from reaching catharsis. Unlike Shen Teh, Mother Courage is not depicted as an inherently noble
character.
"The three Gods ," as McCullough notes, "function as the intermediary between heaven’s abstract ethics and the world
of Szechwan, where attempts at goodness require the temper of pragmatism if survival is to be maintained". They seem
only to be representatives of religious conventions and conservatism, who, at last disappear without having solved the
problems at hand.
References:
1. Brecht, Bertolt. The Good Person of Szechwan. Methuen Drama Edition ed. London: Bloomsbury PLC, 2013.
Print.
2. Brecht, Bertolt. "Brecht on Theatre." Modern European Drama: Background Prose Reading. New Delhi:
Worldview Publications, 2012. Print.
3. Brooker, Peter. "Key Words in Brecht's Theory and Practice of Brecht's Theatre." Cambridge UP, 2007. Print.
4. McCollough, Christopher. "The Good Person of Szechwan." Cambridge UP, 2007. Print.
5. Kumar, Sanjay. “The Good Person of Szechwan.” Delhi