Topic Leadership Submitted To Sir Ahmed Zia
Topic Leadership Submitted To Sir Ahmed Zia
Topic Leadership Submitted To Sir Ahmed Zia
Topic leadership
Submitted to Sir Ahmed Zia
Submitted by
SADIA MUBASHIR 2017-Ag-
ASRA 2017-Ag-
ATTA 2017-Ag-
DEGREE M.COM
SECTION (A)
Marturano, Wren, and Harvey (2013: 1) wrote: ‘We propose an understanding of leadership as
an asymmetrical (albeit interactive and mutual) influence process that serves to articulate,
clarify, and facilitate the accomplishment of a group's (organization's, community's, society's)
objectives (including, importantly, survival). Thought of in this way, it becomes clear that
leadership in some form or another exists essentially any time humans come together to
accomplish things. Such a definition permits indeed, invites – studies of the phenomena of
leadership that include not only a fixed focus on ‘task accomplishment’ or ‘member
satisfaction,’ but also the consideration of broader matters such as the dynamics of context, the
philosophical ‘meaning’ and moral implications of leadership and its objectives, and the impact
of leadership on people, both in groups and considered as individuals.A formal leader
(manager) is a person who is responsible both for the subordinates and for the results.
(Douma & Schreuder, 2002) The firm is constituted by one or more individuals who have the
common goal of generating dividends on the capital invested in it. The very goal itself motivates
its establishment. Quite simply, the firm is an instrument, a means for the owners. The goal is
financial dividends. The major difference between private companies and public agencies is the
motive behind the establishment of these organisations. The private organisation is in
operation because some individuals (or other organisations) have decided to invest their funds
into the firm. The enterprise is in operation as long as the owners wish it to continue and the
market allows it. In contrast, public organisations are in operation because political decisions
have been made to establish these agencies. They remain in operation until decisions are made
to cease their operations.
Maghroori and Rolland (1997) wrote: ‘They [managers] do not exist for their own sake. They
are to serve the organization’s goal and mission and they remain at all times subservient to it.’
A central issue is if or to what degree the organization achieves its goal. Consequently, goal
attainment becomes the core issue for the owners, the managers and the other employees, as
well as for researchers of organizations. Based on this premise of relevance, the question
addressed here is to what degree current leadership researchers are engaged in solving
problems related to leadership and organizational effectiveness. Put differently, in what ways
do present-day leadership researchers help business managers to enhance the profitability of
their companies?
Training will give you a glimpse at the worst mistakes you can make as a leader. It was also
teach you how to help map out a plan for avoiding the traps and pitfalls that can end your
leadership career.
Explanation
Transformational Leadership styles:
Transformational leadership style concentrates on the development of followers as well as their
needs. Managers with transformational leadership style concentrate on the growth and
development of value system of employees, their inspirational level and moralities with the
preamble of their abilities.
According to Bass and Avolio, transformational leaders encourage followers to view problems
from new perspectives, provide support and encouragement communicates a vision, stimulates
emotion and identification.
Bruce et al said that transformational leaders are able to define and articulate a vision for their
organizations and their leadership style can influence or “transform” individual-level variables
such as increasing motivation and organization-level variables, such as mediating conflict
among groups or teams.
According to Burns transactional leader tends to focus on task completion and employee
compliance and these leaders rely quite heavily on organizational rewards and punishments to
influence employee performance.
More than 45 years ago Fiedler (1967: 11) wrote that a ‘major theoretical question in the field
concerns the prediction of leadership effectiveness. Evidently, contemporary researchers do
not agree and have renounced the central goal of this field. Hiller et al. (2011: 1171) have
recently stated that future research would improve ‘if leadership was related to more
“ultimate” tangible outcomes of performance and effectiveness.’ Additionally, they noted that
ultimately, the effects of leaders and leadership are presumed to result in effectiveness and
performance outcomes. More than ten years ago, Collins (2001) noted that performance
improvement at the organizational level is typically inferred, implied and assumed as an
outcome of leadership. May be the time has come to leave inferences, implications and
assumptions behind, and focus on the relationship between leadership behavior and
organizational effectiveness where effectiveness is defined as (1) the degree of goal attainment
and (2) the goal is profitability and (3) the measurement of profitability is an objective one.