Characterization of sewage and design of

sewage treatment plant

A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT
OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE DEGREE OF

Bachelor of Technology in Environmental Engineering

By

SADDAM ANSARI 15BTENVE004

MILAN KUMAR 15BTENVE009

Department of Civil Engineering

,Sam Higginbottom University Of
Agriculture Technology And
Sciences, Allahabad 2019
 Characterization of sewage and design of
sewage treatment plant
A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT
OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE DEGREE OF

Bachelor of Technology in Environmental Engineering

By

SADDAM ANSARI
MILAN KUMAR

Under supervision of
ASS.Prof. CS MISHRA

Department of Civil Engineering

 SAM HIGGINBOTTOM UNIVERSITY OF
AGRICULTURE TECHNOLOGY AND
SCIENCES
CERTIFICATE

This is to certify that the thesis entitled “Characterization of sewage and

design of sewage treatment plant” submitted by Saddam Ansari
Roll No. 15btenve004 and Milan kumar Roll No. 15btenve009 in partial
fulfillment of the requirements for the award of Bachelor of Technology
degree in Environmental Engineering at the Sam Higginbottom
University Of Agriculture Technology And Sciences,Allahabad is an
authentic work carried out by them under my supervision and guidance.

To the best of my knowledge, the matter embodied in the thesis has not
been submitted to any other University/Institute for the award of any
Degree or Diploma.

Date: ( ASS.Prof. CS MISHRA)

 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

My heart quivers with the thrill for offering gratitude to those individuals who
helped me in completion of the project. The most idyllic point of presenting
a project is the opportunity to thank those who have contributed to it.

Unfortunately, the list of acknowledging no matter how extensive is always

incomplete and inadequate. Indeed this page of mention shall never be
able to touch the horizon of generousness of those who tendered their help
to me. First of all, I would like to express my gratitude and obligations to
Ass.Prof CS Mishra, for her kindness in allowing me for introducing the
present topic and for her inspiring direction, constructive judgment and
valuable propositions throughout this project work.

Last but not least, my sincere thanks to all my friends who have patiently
extended all sorts of help for achieving this undertaking.

SADDAM ANSARI MILAN KUMAR

15BTENVE004 15BTENVE009

Dept. of Civil engineering

Sam Higginbottom University Of Agriculture Technology And Sciences
CONTENTS PAGE

List of figures and tables i

Abstract ii

1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Introduction 2
1.2 Objectives of the study 3
1.3 Literature Review 4

2. MONITORING PROTOCOLS
2.1 Study Area 8
2.2 Sampling Techniques 8

3. ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES
3.01 Methodology for measurement of pH value 11
3.02 Methodology for measurement of Alkalinity 12
3.03 Methodology for measurement of Turbidity 14
3.04 Methodology for measurement of Acidity 15
3.05 Methodology for measurement of Chloride 17
3.06 Methodology for measurement of Residual Chlorine 19
3.07 Methodology for measurement of Total Solids 19
3.08 Methodology for measurement of DO 21
3.09 Methodology for measurement of BOD 21
3.10 Methodology for measurement of hardness 23
3.11 Methodology for measurement of carbonates and
bicarbonates 25
3.12 Methodology for measurement of metals 29

4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

4.1 32
5.DESIGN OF SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT 39

6.TIMELINE OF THE PROJECT 45

7.CONCLUSION 47

8.REFERENCES 49
i

LIST OF TABLES PAGE

1. Water consumption by various residential halls

of NIT Rourkela. 32

2. Water consumption by residential quarters in

NIT Rourkela. 33

3. Physical and chemical characteristics of waste

water in different time. 37

4. Determination of different metal content

at different time. 38

5. Milestone of the study. 46

LIST OF FIGURES PAGE

1. Map of Study Area 9

2. Top view of the Sewage Treatment Plant 43

3. Layout of the Sewage Treatment Plant 44

 ii

ABSTRACT

Sam Higginbottom University Of Agriculture Technology And Sciences is

one of the most important educational institutes in the state of U.P with a
large number of people residing in its campus consisting of a number of
laboratories of various departments, residential units, academic blocks and
number of hostels.

A study on domestic waste water characterization has been performed

followed by the design of sewage treatment plant. The present study
involves the analysis of pH value, total solids, total suspended solids,
hardness, acidity, alkalinity, chloride, chlorine, BOD, DO and heavy metals
such as Iron, Copper, Zinc, Magnesium, Nickel, Chromium, Lead, Calcium,
Aluminium, Silicon, Potassium.

A sewage treatment plant is quite necessary to receive the domestic and

commercial waste and removes the materials which pose harm for general
public. Its objective is to produce an environmentally-safe fluid waste
stream (or treated effluent) and a solid waste (or treated sludge) suitable
for disposal or reuse (usually as farm fertilizer).

The samplings of the domestic waste from hostels have been done in
different times of the day to have an average data of the measured
parameters. The average values of pH, Turbidity, Acidity, Chloride,
Residual Chlorine, Hardness, Total Solid, BOD, DO, Alkalinity, Total Iron
Content, Zinc Content, Potassium, Copper, Magnesium, Nickel, Chromium,
Lead, Calcium, Aluminum and Silicon are found out.

A sewage treatment plant has been designed with the treatment units, a
bar screen of dimension 1.7m, an aeration tank of dimension 4.5 x 4.5 x 3.7
m3, a collection pit of diameter 4m and depth 5 m.

Keywords: Characterization, sewage, treatment plant.

 1

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION
 2

1.1 Introduction:

Pollution in its broadest sense includes all changes that curtail natural utility
and exert deleterious effect on life. The crisis triggered by the rapidly
growing population and industrialization with the resultant degradation of
the environment causes a grave threat to the quality of life. Degradation of
water quality is the unfavorable alteration of the physical, chemical and
biological properties of water that prevents domestic, commercial,
industrial, agricultural, recreational and other beneficial uses of water.
Sewage and sewage effluents are the major sources of water pollution.
Sewage is mainly composed of human fecal material, domestic wastes
including wash-water and industrial wastes.

The growing environmental pollution needs for decontaminating waste

water result in the study of characterization of waste water, especially
domestic sewage. In the past, domestic waste water treatment was mainly
confined to organic carbon removal. Recently, increasing pollution in the
waste water leads to developing and implementing new treatment
techniques to control nitrogen and other priority pollutants.

Sewage Treatment Plant is a facility designed to receive the waste from

domestic, commercial and industrial sources and to remove materials that
damage water quality and compromise public health and safety when
discharged into water receiving systems. It includes physical, chemical, and
biological processes to remove various contaminants depending on its
constituents. Using advanced technology it is now possible to re-use
sewage effluent for drinking water.

The present study comprises the study on quality of domestic waste water
that is discharged from the HB Hall of National Institute of Technology,
Rourkela, through the kitchen outlets and bathroom effluents. The study
includes characterization tests for pH value, acidity, alkalinity, chloride,
residual chlorine, turbidity & DO.
 3

1.2 Objectives of the study:

The principal objective of waste water treatment is generally to allow
human and industrial effluents to be disposed of without danger to human
health or unacceptable damage to the natural environment. An
environmentally-safe fluid waste stream is produced. No danger to human
health or unacceptable damage to the natural environment is expected.
Sewage includes household waste liquid from toilets, baths, showers,
kitchens, sinks and so forth that is disposed of via sewers. Sewage also
includes liquid waste from industry and commerce.

The objectives of the study are:

1. Physical, chemical and biological characterization of the domestic

waste water.

2. Comparison with the prescribed standard

3. Design of the sewage treatment plant.

Observation of Study: Waste water samples from the kitchen effluent and
the bathroom.

The following physical characteristics were studied:

i. Odour
ii. Taste
iii. Colour
iv. Floatables
v. Turbidity
 4

The following chemical characteristics were studied:

i. Total Iron
ii. Copper
iii. Zinc
iv. Potassium
v. Lead
vi. Aluminum

For determination of inorganic non-metallic constituents we determined the:

i. Alkalinity
ii. Acidity
iii. Chloride
iv. Residual Chlorine
v. Sulphate
vi. Ph. of the sample
vii. Biochemical Oxygen Demand
viii. Dissolved Oxygen

1.3 Literature Review :

Physical characteristic of waste water:

Odour: It depends on the substances which arouse human receptor cells

on coming in contact with them. Pure water doesn’t produce odour or taste
sensations. Thus waste water which contains toxic substances has
pungent smell which makes it easy to distinguish. Odour is recognized as a
quality factor affecting acceptability of drinking water.

The organic and inorganic substance contributes to taste or odour. The

ultimate odour tasting device is the human nose. The odour intensity is
done by threshold odour test

Taste: The sense of taste result mainly from chemical stimulation of

sensory nerve endings in tongue. Fundamental sensations of taste are, by
 5

convention more than by research evidence, salt, sweet, bitter, and sour.
The rating involves the following steps: a) dilution series including random
blanks is prepared b) initial tasting of about half the sample by taking water
into mouth and holding it for several seconds and discharging it without
swallowing. c) Forming an initial judgment on the rating scale d) a final
rating made for the sample e) rinsing mouth with taste and odour free water
f) resting.

Colour: Colour in water results from the presence of natural metallic ions
such as Fe or Mg, humus and peat materials, planktons and weeds. It is
removed to make water suitable for general and industrial applications.
After turbidity is removed the apparent colour and that due to suspended
matter is found out.

Tristimulus, Spectroscopic and Platinum cobalt method is used.

Total solids: It refers to matters suspended or dissolved in water and

waste water. Solids affect the water or effluent quality adversely in a
number of ways. Water with highly dissolved solids are not palatable and
may cause physiological reaction in transient consumer.

A limit of 500 mg dissolved solids/L is desirable for drinking waters.

Evaporation method is used to separate total solids and their weight is
found out.

Floatables: One important criterion for evaluating the possible effect of

waste disposal into surface water is the amount of floatable material in the
waste. Two general types of floating matters are found

(i) Particulate matters like 'grease balls'

(ii) Liquid component capable of spreading as thin visible film over large
areas.

It is important because it accumulates on the surface and may contain

pathogenic bacteria and viruses.

Turbidity: Clarity of water is important in producing products destined for

human consumption and in many manufacturing uses. It is caused by
 6

suspended matter such as clay, silt, finely divided organic and inorganic
matter, soluble colored organic compounds. Turbidity is an expression of
the optical property that causes light to be scattered and absorbed rather
than transmitted in straight lines through the sample. The standard method
for determination of turbidity has been based on the Jackson candle
turbidimeter and Nephlometer.

Chemical characteristic of waste water:

Chemical characteristics of water state the presence of metals their

treatment, the determination of inorganic non-metallic constituents and the
determination of organic constituents. Here goes a brief description of all
the experiments we have performed.

Biological characteristic of waste water:

Water quality has a key role in deciding the abundance, species

composition, stability, productivity and physiological condition of indigenous
populations of aquatic communities. Their existence is an expression of the
quality of the water. Biological methods used for evaluating water quality
include the collection, counting and identification of aquatic organisms.
Most microorganisms known to microbiologists can be found in domestic
wastewater like Bacteria, Protozoa, Viruses, and Algae.

Planktons, Periphyton, Macro-phyton, Macro-invertebrates, Fish,

Amphibians and Aquatic reptiles are the biotic group of interdependent
organism. Wastewater contains vast quantities of bacteria and other
organisms. Aerobic bacteria break down organic matter in the presence of
available oxygen. Anaerobic bacteria disintegrate organic matter which is
shut off from free oxygen, such as in the interior of a mass of feces or a
dead body. The products of anaerobic decomposition have an extremely
nauseating odor. Matter in which this condition exists is said to be septic. A
multitude of the bacteria in wastewater are coliform bacteria: those found in
the digestive tract of normal humans. It is these comparatively few
pathogenic organisms that pose the greatest public health hazard. Waste
water which is not properly treated may eventually find its way into a
community water source and spread waterborne diseases
 7

CHAPTER 2

MONITORING PROTOCOLS
 8

2.1 Study Area:

Achievement of a safe and healthful workplace is the responsibility of an
organization, the people residing in the place and the workers who are
given the charge to protect the environment. Waste disposal and
minimization and pollution prevention should be the preferred approach.
Stringent penalties for the improper disposal of wastes should be adopted.

2.2 Sampling Techniques:

Waste water samples have been collected in contamination free sampling
bottles of 1000 ml (Turson make) from the kitchen effluent and the
bathroom.
9
 10

CHAPTER 3

ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES
 11

3.01 METHODOLOGY FOR MEASUREMENT OF pH VALUE

(ELECTROMERIC METHODS)
The negative logarithm of concentration of hydrogen ion gives the pH of a
sample. pH varies from 6-8 in waste water sample, due to hydrolysis of
salts of bases and acids. Carbon dioxide, Hydrogen Sulphide and
Ammonia which are dissolved affect pH value of water. pH value may be
more than 9 in alkaline springs and the pH may be 4 or even less than 4 for
acidic ones. Industrial wastes do affect the pH as it depends on buffer
capacity of water. pH value of water sample in lab changes because of
loss-or absorption of gases, reactions with sediments, chemical reaction
taking place within the sample bottle. Therefore pH value should preferably
be determined at the time of collection of sample. pH can be determined
electrometrically or calorimetrically. The electrometric method is more
accurate but requires special apparatus. The calorimetric method is simple
and requires less expensive apparatus, and is sufficiently accurate for
general work.

PRINCIPLE

The pH value is found by measurement of the electromotive force

generated in a cell. It is made up of an indicator electrode which is reactive
to hydrogen ions such as a glass electrode. When it is immersed in the test
solution the contact between reference electrode (usually mercury/calomel
electrode), and the test solution the electromotive force is measured. A pH
meter, that is, a high impedance voltmeter is marked in terms of pH.
Varieties of electrodes have been suggested for the determination of pH.
The hydrogen gas electrode is the primary standard. Glass electrode in
coordination with calomel electrode is generally used with reference
potential provided by saturated calomel electrode. The glass electrode
system is based on the theory that a change, of 1 pH unit produces an
electrical change of 59.1 mV at 25°C. The membrane of the glass forms a
partition between two liquids of differing hydrogen ion concentration thus a
potential is produced between the two sides of the membrane which is
proportional to the difference in pH between the liquids.

The apparatus used are:

 12

 pH meter - With glass and reference electrode (saturated calomel),

 preferably with temperature compensation.
 Thermometer - With least Count of 0.5°C.

PROCEDURE:

The instrument is standardized after required warm-tip period. A buffer

solution of pH near to that of the sample is used. The electrode is checked
against at least one additional buffer of different pH value. The temperature
of the water is found and if temperature compensation is available in the
instruments it is adjusted. The electrodes are rinsed and gently wiped with
solution. If necessary, the electrodes are immersed into the sample beaker
or sample stream and stirred at a constant rate to provide homogeneity and
suspension of solids. Rate of stirring is minimized and the air transfer rate
at the air-water interface of the sample is noted. The sample pH and
temperature is noted.

3.02 METHODOLOGY FOR MEASUREMENT OF ALKALINITY

The sample liquid for analysis should be either free from turbidity or should
be allowed to settle before analyzing it.

The apparatus used are:

  pH Meter
  Burette - 50-ml capacity.
 Magnetic Stirrer Assembly

The reagents used are:

 Distilled Water - pH must be greater than 6.0. In case the pH falls

below 6.0, it shall be boiled for 15 minutes and cooled to room
 temperature.
 Sulphuric Acid - 5.6 ml of concentrated sulphuric acid is diluted with
 one liter with distilled water.
 Standard Solution of Sulphuric Acid - 0.02 N.
 13

 Phenolphthalein Indicator - 0.5 g of phenolphthalein in 100 ml is

 mixed, 1: 1 (v/v) alcohol water mixture is taken.
 Mixed indicator Solution - Dissolve 0.02 g methyl red and 0.01 g
bromocresol green in 100 ml, 35 %, ethyl or isopropyl alcohol.

PROCEDURE:

20 ml of sample is pipetted into a 100-ml beaker. 2 to 3 drops of

phenolphthalein indicator is added to the sample if the pH of the sample is
above 8.3. It is then titrated with standard H2SO4 solution till the pink color
observed by indicator just disappears (equivalence of pH 8.3). The volume
of standard H2SO4 solution used is recorded. 2 to 3 drops of mixed
indicator is put to the solution in which the phenolphthalein alkalinity has
been determined. The solution is titrated with standard acid to light pink
color (equivalence of pH 3-7). The volume of standard acid used after
phenolphthalein alkalinity is recorded.

CALCULATION:

Calculate alkalinity in the sample as follows:

Total alkalinity (as mg/l CaCO3) = (A + B) x N x 5000

V

Where,

A = ml of standard H2SO4 used to titrate to pH 83,

B = ml of standard H2SO4 used to titrate from pH 8.3 to pH

3.7, N = normality of acid used, and

V = volume in ml of sample taken for test.

 14

3.03 METHODOLOGY FOR THE DETERMINATION OF

TURBIDITY:

PRINCIPLE:
The intensity of light scattered by the sample under defined conditions is
compared with the intensity of light scattered by a standard reference
suspension under the same conditions, forms the basis of determination of
turbidity.
Higher the intensity of scattered lights higher the value of turbidity.
Formazin polymer is generally used as turbidity standard because it is
more reproducible than other types of standards used previously. The
turbidity of a particular concentration of Formalin suspension is defined as
40 Jackson turbidity units. The same suspension of Formazin has a
turbidity of approximately 40 units when measured on Jackson candle
turbidimeter. Thus turbidity units based on the Formazin preparation closely
approximate those derived from Jackson candle turbidimeter but it may not
always be identical to them.

The apparatus used are:

 Sample Tubes - The sample tubes should be of clear and colorless
 glass.
 Turbidimeter

The reagents used are:

  Turbidity-Free Water
  Hexamethylene Tetramine Solution
  Hydrazine Sulphate Solution
  Turbidity Standard Suspension I ( Formazin)
 Turbidity Standard Suspension II

PROCEDURE:
TURBIDIMETER CALIBRATION - The manufacturer’s operating
instructions is followed. The standards on turbidimeter covering the range
of interest are measured. If the instrument is already calibrated in standard
turbidity units, this procedure will check the accuracy of calibration.
 15

 Turbidity less than 43 Units - The sample is shaken to disperse the

solids. Air bubbles disappear gradually. Sample into turbidimeter tube is
poured carefully and turbidity value is directly read from the instrument
scale.

 Turbidity greater than 40 Units – If turbidity values are more than 40
units, the sample is diluted with clear distilled water to compare and
bring the values within range. The readings are taken of the diluted
sample. Then the turbidity is computed of the original sample from the
turbidity of the diluted sample and the dilution factor.

CALCULATION:
Calculate the turbidity of diluted samples, using the following equation:
Turbidity units = A x (B+C)/C
Where,
A = turbidity units found in diluted sample, B =
volume in ml of dilution water used, and C =
volume of sample in ml taken for dilution.

3.04 METHODOLOGY FOR THE DETERMINATION OF

ACIDITY:

PRINCIPLE:
Acidity of water is the numerically expressible capacity to react with a
strong base to a designated pH. It may be defined as equivalent
concentration of hydrogen ions in mg/l. The equation in its simplest form is
as follows:
H+ + NaOH = H2O + Na+

The apparatus used are:

  pH Meter
  Burette - 50-ml capacity.
 Magnetic Stirring Device

The Reagents used are:

 16

  Distilled Water
  Potassium Acid Phthalate
 Sodium Hydroxide Solution - 15 N.
Sodium hydroxide solution - 1 N 67 ml of 15 N NaOH solution is diluted
to one liter with distilled water.
Sodium hydroxide solution - 0.02 N 20 ml of 1 N NaOH solution is diluted to
one liter and is standardized using standard potassium acid phthalate
Phenolphthalein Indicator - 0.5 g of phenolphthalein is dissolved in 100 ml
1: 1 (v/v) alcohol water mixture and 0.02 N NaOH solution is added drop by
drop till slight pink colour is observed.
Methyl Orange Indicator – 0.5 g of methyl orange is dissolved in distilled
water and made up to 100 ml in a volumetric flask.

PROCEDURE:

Indicator Method - 20 ml of a suitable amount of sample is pipetted into a

100 ml beaker. Less than 20 ml of titrant shall be required for the titration
that should be the volume of sample. The pH of water is determined. If pH
is less than 3.7, two drops of methyl orange indicator is added into the first
sample beaker. It is titrated with standard 0.02 N NaOH solution until the
colour converts to the faint orange. The volume of NaOH used is recorded.
2 to 3 drops of phenolphthalein indicator is added to the second sample
beaker. It is again titrated with 0.02 N NaOH solution till the colour of
solution changes to faint pink colour. The volume used is recorded.

Potentiometric Method - 20 ml of a suitable aliquot of sample is pipetted

into a 100 ml beaker. It is then titrated with standard NaOH solution to pH
3.7 and pH 8.3. The volume of standard NaOH used is measured. No
indicator is required.
 17

Calculation - Acidity in the sample is calculated as follows:

Acidity at pH 3.7, as mg/l CaCO3 = A x N x 50000/V
Acidity at pH 8.3, as mg/l CaCO3 = B x N x 50000/V

Where,
A = volume in ml of standard sodium hydroxide
N = normality of standard sodium hydroxide, V =
volume in ml of sample taken for test, and
B = volume in ml of standard sodium hydroxide used to titrate to pH 3.7 is
used to titrate to pH 8.3.
3.05 METHODOLOGY FOR MEASUREMENT OF CHLORIDE

PRINCIPLE:
Soluble and slightly dissociated mercuric chloride is formed when Chloride
is titrated with mercuric nitrate. Diphenyl Carbazone within the pH range of
2.3 to 2.8 signals the end point by the formation of a purple complex with
extra mercuric ions.

The apparatus used are:

  Erlenmeyer flask - 250 ml capacity.
 Microburette - 5 ml with 0.01 ml graduation intervals.

The reagents used are:

  Standard sodium chloride solution
  Nitric acid - 0. I N
  Sodium hydroxide - 0.1 N
  Reagents for chloride concentrations below 700 mg/l
 Indicator-acidifier reagent - Nitric acid concentration of this reagent
decides the success of the determination and it can be varied as
indicated in (a) or (b) to befit the alkalinity range of the sample.
Reagent (a) contains sufficient nitric acid to counteract a total
alkalinity of 150 mg as CaCO3/l to the proper pH in a 100 ml sample.
 18

a) 250 mg s-diphenylcarbazone, 4-O ml. concentration nitric acid and 30 mg

xylene cyanol FF in 100 ml 95 percent ethyl alcohol or isopropyl alcohol. The
sample is stored in a dark bottle in a refrigerator. This reagent is not stable
indefinitely. Deterioration causes a slow end point and high results.

Standard mercuric nitrate titrant - 2.3 g mercuric nitrate [Hg (NO3)2 or 2.5 g
Hg (NO3).12H2O] is dissolved in 100 ml distilled water containing 0.25 ml
concentrated nitric acid. It is diluted to just less than 1 liter. Replicates are
used containing 5.00 ml standard sodium chloride solution and 10 mg
sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) diluted to 100 ml with distilled water. It is
adjusted to 0.0141 N and a final standardization of 1.00 ml = 500 µg Cl- is
made. It is stored away from light in a dark bottle.

Mixed indicator reagent - 0.50 g diphenylcarbazone powder and 0.05 g

bromophenol blue powder is dissolved in 75 ml 95 percent ethyl or
isopropyl alcohol and dilute to 100 ml with the same alcohol.
0.141 N standard mercuric nitrate is used as titrant.

PROCEDURE:
100 ml sample is taken such that the chloride content is less than 10 mg.
1.0 ml indicator acidifier reagents are put. pH is conformed to about 8 for
highly alkaline or acid waters before adding indicator-acidifier reagent.
0.411 N Mercuric Nitrate is titrated with the solution to a definite purple end
point. The solution turns from green blue to blue a few drops before the end
point.
The blank is determined by titrating 100 ml distilled water containing 10 mg
of sodium bicarbonate.

Chloride, mg/l = (V1 – V2) x N x35450

V3
Where,
 19

V1 = volume in ml of silver nitrate used by the sample,

V2 = volume in ml of silver nitrate used in the blank titration,
V3 = volume in ml of sample taken for titration and
N = normality of silver nitrate solution.

3.06 METHODOLOGY FOR THE DETERMINATION OF

RESIDUAL CHLORINE:
It is measured as the chlorine left in the water after the required contact
period which will ensure complete killing of bacteria and oxidation of the
organic matter usually a free chlorine residue is considered to be sufficient.
The reagents used are
 O- Toluidine - 4 drops

PROCEDURE:
O- Toluidine is added to the sample and mixed thoroughly. After 15 to 20
minutes the colour is developed. The comparator was placed to match the
colour of the sample. The volume of indicator used was noted down.
Generally the concentration of residual chlorine must be 1 - 2 mg/l.

3.07 METHODOLOGY FOR THE DETERMINATION OF

TOTAL SOLIDS:
PRINCIPLE:
The sample is evaporated in a weighed dish on a steam-bath and is dried
to a constant mass in an oven either at 103-105°C or 179-181°C. Total
residue is calculated from increase in mass.

Note - In general, by evaporating and drying water samples at 179-

181°C values are obtained which conform more closely to those
obtained by summation of individually determined mineral salts

The apparatus used are:

  Evaporating Dish
 Steam-Bath
 20

  Drying Oven
  Desiccator
 Analytical Balance

PROCEDURE:

1. The clean evaporating dish is heated to 180°C for 1 hour. It is cooled,

desiccated, weighed and stored in desiccator until it is ready.

2. The volume of the sample is selected which has residue between 25 and
250 mg, preferably between 190 and 200 mg. This volume may be found
out from values of specific conductance. If a measurable residue has to be
obtained successive aliquots of sample can be added to the sample dish.

3. This volume is pipetted to a weighed evaporating dish placed on a

steam-bath. A drying oven can be used to perform evaporation. To prevent
oiling and splattering of the sample the temperature should be lowered to
around 98°C. The dish is taken to an oven at 103-105°C, or 179-181°C and
dried to constant mass, after complete evaporation of water from the
residue. It is done till the difference in the successive weighing is less than
0.5 mg. To eliminate necessity of checking for constant mass drying for a
long duration (usually 1 to 2 hours) is done. The time for drying to constant
mass with a given type of sample when a number of samples of nearly
same type are to be analyzed can be determined by trial.

4. The dish is weighed as soon as it has cooled. Residue is avoided to stay

for long time as some residues are hygroscopic and may absorb water from
desiccant which may not be absolutely dry.

CALCULATION - The total residue is calculated using the following

equation:
Total residue, mg/l = 1000xM/V
 21

Where,
M = mass in mg of total residue, and
Y = volume in ml of the sample.

3.08 METHODOLOGY FOR MEASUREMENT OF DO:

The apparatus used are:

  Incubation bottles
  DO meter
 Air incubator

PROCEDURE:
Water is kept in incubator and a magnetic stirrer is put inside the bottle.
The magnetic stirrer is incessantly rotated inside the bottle. Then with the
help of DO meter 3 readings are noted. The first reading is taken at the
bottom, second at mid-point and third at top of the bottle. Thus the average
of the readings will give the dissolved oxygen present in the water sample.

3.09 METHODOLOGY FOR MEASUREMENT OF BOD:

PRINCIPLE:
The biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) test is based mainly on the
classification of biological activity of a substance. A procedure measures
the dissolved oxygen consumed by micro-organisms while capable of
taking and oxidizing the organic matter under aerobic conditions. The
standard test condition lets in incubating the sample in an air tight bottle, in
dark at a required temperature for specific time.

The apparatus used are:

 22

i) Incubation Bottles: The bottle has capacity of 300 ml. It has narrow
neck with even mouth and has ground glass stoppers. New bottles
are cleaned with 5 N hydrochloric acid or sulphuric acid and rinsed
with distilled water. In normal use, bottles once used for
Winkler’s procedure should only be rinsed with tap water followed
by distilled water. During incubation water is added to the flared
mouth of the bottle time to time, to ensure proper sealing.

ii) Air Incubator: Air incubation with thermostatically controlled 27°C +-

1°C. Light is avoided to prevent possibility of photosynthetic
production of oxygen.

PROCEDURE:
After taking water in incubation bottles, 4 gm of NaOH is kept at the neck of
the bottle. A magnetic stirrer is retained inside the bottle. The magnetic
stirrer continuously revolves inside the bottle. Special caps attached with
an electronic meter keep the bottle air tight. The instrument directly records
BOD reading at every 24 hour. After that the bottles are preserved in the
incubators for days as per need of study. The same procedure follows for
BOD 3 days and BOD 5 days.
 23

3.10 METHODOLOGY FOR THE DETERMINATION OF

HARDNESS:

Principle:
This method is contingent upon the power of ethylenediamine tetraacetic
acid (C10H14O8N2)

or its disodium salt to form stable complexes with calcium and magnesium
ions. When the dye eriochrome black T (EBT) is added to a solution
containing calcium and magnesium ions at pH 10.0 a wine red complex is
formed. This solution is titrated with standard solution of disodium salt of
EDTA, which extracts calcium and magnesium from the dye complex and
the dye is changed back to its original blue colour. Eriochrome black T is
used to indicate the end-point for the titration of calcium and magnesium
together.
 24

The reagents used are:

i. Buffer solution (NH4Cl + NH4OH)
ii. Standard calcium solution
iii. Eriochrome black 1 indicator solution
iv. Inhibitors
v. Hydroxylamine hydrochloride solution
vi. Potassium ferrocyanide crystals
vii. Sodium sulphide inhibitor
viii. Sodium cyanide solution
ix. Standard EDTA solution

PROCEDURE:
25.0 ml of standard calcium solution is pipetted in a porcelain basin. The
volume is adjusted to 50 ml with distilled water. 1 ml buffer solution is used.
1 to 2 drops of indicator is put. After continuous stirring until the reddish
tinge disappears, it isn’t titrated. Few drops of sample at 3 to 5 second
interval are added. At the end point the colour is sky blue.

For drinking, surface and saline waters - An aliquot of water sample is

pipetted, in a porcelain dish or 150-ml beaker. The volume is tuned to
approximately 50 ml. 1 ml hydroxylamine hydrochloride (NH4OH.HCl) is
added to the solution. 2 ml of buffer solution is mixed so as to achieve pH
of 10.0 to 10.1. 2 ml sodium cyanide or sodium sulphide inhibitor solution is
put if the end point isn’t sharp. If Cu, Zn, Pb, Co and Ni are absent and if
 25

the sample contains less than 0.25 mg of Fe and 0.025 mg of Mn the

addition of NaCN or Na2S may be omitted. 2 ml of Eriochrome black T
indicator solution is added and titrated with standard EDTA solution stirring
rapidly in the beginning. It is stirred slowly towards the end when all the
traces of red and purple colour disappear and solution is clear sky blue in
colour.

For waste waters and highly polluted waters - An aliquot of the sample is
digested with 3 ml of distilled conc. HNO3 in a beaker on a hot plate. It is
evaporated to near dryness while ensuring that the sample does not boil.
Digestion with nitric acid is repeated till the digestate is light in colour. It is
evaporated to near dryness and cooled. Little amount of 1: 1 hydrochloric
acid (5 ml) is added and warmed on a steam-bath to dissolve the residue.
Note 1 - For water with very low hardness (less than 5 mg/l) micro burette
is used.
Note 2 - Sample size may be selected such that the result lies between 200
to 300 mg/l of hardness (as CaCO3).

CALCULATION:
The hardness is calculated as follows:
Total hardness (as CaCO3), mg/l = 1000 V1/V2

Where,
V1 = Volume in ml of the EDTA standard solution used in the titration.
V2 = Volume in ml of the sample taken for the test.

3.11 METHODOLOGY FOR THE DETERMINATION OF

CARBONATES AND BICARBONATES: (TITRIMETRIC
METHOD)
 26

PRINCIPLE:
Potentiometric method is used to do the titration. Phenolphthalein is used
as an indicator. The total OH-, CO3--, and HCO3- content is first found out by
titration with standard acid using methyl orange/bromocresol green
indicator. Equal portion of the sample is titrated against the same acid
using phenolphthalein/metacresol purple indicator.

The apparatus used are:

i. Electrometric Titrator
ii. Titration Vessel
iii. Magnetic Stirrer
iv. Pipettes, Volumetric
v. Flasks, Volumetric
vi. Burettes, Borosilicate Glass
vii. Polyolefin Bottles

The reagents used are:

  Sodium Carbonate Solution — Approximately 0.05 N
  Standard Hydrochloric Mid — 0.1N
  Standard Hydrochloric Acid — 0.02 N
  Methyl Orange/ Boromocresol Green Indicator
  Metacresol Purple Indicator Solution
 Phenolphthalein Solution

PROCEDURE:

Sample Size
Large amount of carbonate and bicarbonate concentrations are found in
wastewater therefore a single sample size and normality of titrant is difficult
to specify. If alkalinity is less than 1000 mg as CaCO3/l, 20 ml of
 27

sample is taken and titrated with 0.02 N HCl. If alkalinity is more than 1000
mg as CaCO3/l, 5 ml of the sample is titrated with 0.1 N hydrochloric acid.
The end point may be determined by any of the following:
a) By colour change, and
b) Potentiometrically.

Potentiometric Titration

Distilled water is used to rinse the electrodes and titration vessel. Sample
pH is measured. Standard hydrochloric acid is added in growths of 0.5 ml
or less, so that a change of less than 0.2 pH units occur per increment.
Magnetic stirrer is used to mix thoroughly and steadily. Splashing is
avoided at all cost. The pH is recorded after reading becomes constant.
The cumulative milliliters of titrant added are recorded after mixture is
titrated to pH 8.3. The total amount of titrant used is recorded. As the end
point borders on smaller additions of alkali are done.

CALCULATION:
Phenolphthalein alkalinity is calculated by using the volume of acid used for
phenolphthalein end point. It can be titrated potentiometrically to pH 8.3.
The total alkalinity is found out by using the volume of acid used for
bromocresol green end point or titrated potentiometrically to pH 4.5.

Alkalinity (CaCO3 mg/l) = A x N x 50 /ml of sample.

Where,
A= ml of standard acid.
N = Normality of acid.
The results obtained from the phenolphthalein and total alkalinity
determinations can be used to calculate the carbonate and bicarbonate
concentrations as CaCO3. The method specifies the entire alkalinity to
bicarbonate, carbonate and hydroxide. It assumes the absence of other
(weak) inorganic or organic acids, such as silicic, phosphoric and boric
 28

acids. Since the calculations are made on a stoichiometric basis, ion

concentrations in the strictest sense are not represented in the results.
So they may differ significantly from actual concentrations especially at pH
greater than 10. According to this outline
a) Carbonate (CO3--) alkalinity is present when phenolphthalein alkalinity is
not zero but is less than total alkalinity;
b) Hydroxide (OH-) alkalinity is present if phenolphthalein alkalinity is more
than half of the total alkalinity
c) Bicarbonate (HCO3-) alkalinity is present if phenolphthalein alkalinity is
less than half of the total alkalinity.
These relationships may be calculated by the following scheme where P is
phenolphthalein alkalinity and T is total alkalinity. The smaller value of P or
(T–P) is taken into account. After that carbonate alkalinity equals twice the
smaller value. If the smaller value is P, the balance (T–2P) is bicarbonate’s
value. When the smaller value is (T–P) the balance (2P–T) is hydroxide’s
value. The results are expressed as CaCO3.
 29

3.12 METHODOLOGY FOR THE DETERMINATION OF

METALS:

PRINCIPLE:

The Atomic Absorption Spectrometer is used to determine the contents of

metals in the waste water sample. The principle associated here is a light
beam is guided through the flame into a monochromator and then to a
detector that measures the amount of light absorbed by the atomized
element in the flame. For each metal there is one distinct absorption
wavelength, so a source lamp formed of that element is used. This makes it
free from spectral interference. The amount of energy of the characteristic
wavelength absorbed in the flame is proportional to the concentration of the
element in the sample. The flame emission method produces good results
for determination of metals.

The effects of metals in water and waste water range from beneficial
through troublesome to dangerously toxic. Some are essential but others
adversely affect water consumers, waste water treatment systems and
receiving waters. Flame and electro-thermal methods are generally
applicable at moderate concentration levels.

1. Sampling and Sample preservation: Before collecting sample fraction to

be analyzed is decided. Errors introduced during sampling and storage
is taken care of. The best sampling containers are made of quartz and
TFE.
2. The sample is preserved immediately after acidifying with concentrated
nitric acid.
3. Contaminated metals from containers, distilled water, or membrane
filters are avoided introduction.
4. For analysis of microgram-per-liter concentrations of metals, airborne
contaminants in the form of volatile compounds, dust, soot and aerosols
present in laboratory air become significant.

The presences of many metals were tested by atomic absorption

spectrometer analysis.
 30

The apparatus used is:

Atomic Absorption Spectrometer made up of

  Light emitting source.

  Burner – Premix type, introduces spray into condensing chamber.
  Readout – The display unit.
  Lamps – Hollow Cathode type.
  Pressure reducing valves.
 Vent.

PROCEDURE:

The sample preparation depends on the metal we need to measure. The

manufacturer’s operation manual is studied and the instrument is operated.
A hollow cathode lamp for the required metal is installed. The slit width is
set as per the manual. The instrument is warmed up to 20 minutes till the
energy source stabilizes. Air is turned on and the flow rate is adjusted as
per the manufacturer’s specification. The instrument is calibrated. 3
different concentration of standard metal solution is prepared and the blank
is analyzed. The instrument is zeroed. The standard solutions are analyzed
and absorbance is recorded. A calibrated curve is prepared by plotting on a
linear graph paper. Absorbance of standard vs. the concentration is plotted.
Then the sample is analyzed and the concentration of each metal ion (in
microgram per liter) is calculated.
 31

CHAPTER 4

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

 32

4.1 Tabulations:
Average water supplied = 1.5 lakh gallon
So, total waste water generated = 80 % of Supplied Water
= 0.8 x 1.5 lakh gallon
= 1.2 lakh gallon
 34

The presence of non-metallic constituents and the metallic constituents

from the waste water sample was determined.
1. Determination of acidity content

CONCENTRATION
SOURCE
IN PPM
Bath room
3.6
waste water
Kitchen waste
4.5
water
Tap water 2.3
Distilled water 1

2. Determination of chloride content

CONCENTRATION
SOURCE STANDARD
IN PPM
Bath room
57.9
waste water
Kitchen waste
113 30 -100
Water
Tap water 3.5

3. Determination of Ph of the sample

SOURCE PH STANDARD

Kitchen waste 7.89

Bath room waste 7.36 7.8
Tap water 8.01
 35

4. Determination of residual chlorine

SL NO SOURCE CONC. IN PPM STANDARD

1 Kitchen waste 2

2 Bath room waste 2 1 - 2 ppm

3 Tap water 1

2 Determination of turbidity of sample

SL NO SOURCE VALUE IN NTU

1 Bath room waste 14

2 Kitchen waste 116

3 Tap water 10

3 Table for determination of alkalinity

Here utilization of sulphuric acid is used is zero. Thus it indicates presence

of bicarbonate.

CONC. IN STANDARD
SOURCE
PPM CONC.

Kitchen waste 75
Bathroom
80 50 – 200
waste
Tap water 15
 36

Determination of metals by atomic absorption spectrometry

1. Total iron content

SL NO SOURCE CONC. IN MG/L

1 Kitchen waste 2.863

2 Bathroom waste 0.024
3 Tap water 0

2. Zinc content

SL NO SOURCE CONC. IN MG/L

1 Kitchen waste 0.115

2 Bathroom waste 0.086
3 Tap water 1.549

3. Copper content

SL NO SOURCE CONC. IN MG/L

1 Kitchen waste 0.019

2 Bathroom waste 0.0

3 Tap water 0.007

4. Potassium content

SL NO SOURCE CONC. IN MG/L

1 Kitchen waste 11.334

2 Bathroom waste 9.285

3 Tap water 2.491

 37

Tabulation for physical and chemical characteristics

in different time

Time 8 a.m. 12 p.m. 1-2 p.m. 5-6 p.m. PERMISSIBLE

VALUE

Property

Turbidity 32 45 50 38 5
(NTU)
pH 8.76 8.01 8.22 8.4 6.5 - 8.5

Acidity 1.8 2.6 3 1.3

(mg/l)
Alaklinity 42 45 158 78 600
(mg/l)

Chloride 11 17 20 15 1000
(mg/l)

Residual 2 2 2 2 1
Chlorine
(mg/l)
Hardness 23 38 40 30 200
(mg/l)

Total Solids 200 240 420 600 2000

(mg/l)

BOD (mg/l) 1.3 1.21 1.23 1.03 10

DO (mg/l) 7.1 7.01 7.02 6.9 2000

 38

Tabulation for determination of different mineral content at different

time
Time 8 a.m. 12 p.m. 1-2 p.m. 5-6 p.m. PERMISSIBLE
VALUE

Metals

Iron (mg/l) 0.077 0.213 0.532 0.052 0.3

Zinc (mg/l) 0.008 0.119 0.124 0.131 15

Copper 0.019 0.012 0.035 0.029 1.5

(mg/l)
Magnesium 0.41 1.918 2.581 3.411 30
(mg/l)
Nickel (mg/l) 0.01 0.011 0.044 0 0.02

Chromium 0.113 0.212 0.242 0.114 0.05

(mg/l)
Lead (mg/l) 0.101 0.091 0.261 0.024 0.01

Calcium 5.41 12.1 19.76 11.23 200

(mg/l)
Aluminum 0.07 0.05 0 0.01 0.2
(mg/l)
Silicon 3.91 11 10.602 5.21 7-10
(mg/l)
Potassium 1.121 1.31 2.41 3.75 -
(mg/l)
 39

CHAPTER 5

DESIGN OF SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT

 40

5.1 Design of Sewage Treatment Plant:

Plant capacity:
Average water supply per day = 423000 lit = 0.423 mld*
Average sewage generated per day = 85% of supplied water
= 0.85*0.423=0.36 mld
= 360 kld**
Average sewage generated per hour=360/24=15 cum/hr
Peak factor = 3
Design flow capacity (maximum) = 13 x 3=45 cum/hr
*mld – Million liter per day **kld – Kilo Liter per day

Sizing calculation for collection pit:

Retention time required = 4 h
Average design flow = 15 m3/h
Capacity of collection sump = 4 x 15=60 m3
Assume liquid depth = 5 m
Area required for collection pits = 60/5 = 12 m2
Let it is a circular tank
 
r = 1.93m

Volume of the pit provide = π/4 x 4 x 4 x5

= 62.8 m3
Thus Area of the pit provided = 12.6 m2

Sizing calculation of bar screen:

Peak discharge = 45 m3/h
Average discharge = 15 m3/h
Average velocity @ average flow isn’t allowed to exceed 0.8 m/sec
Average spacing between bar 20 mm
The velocity = 0.3*60=18 m/h/ m2
Cross sectional area required = flow/velocity
= 45/18 = 2.5 m2
 41

Liquid depth required= 1 m

Velocity through screen at the peak flow = 1.6 m/sec
Clear area = 2.5/1.6 = 1.3
No. of clear spacing = 1.3/0.02 = 65
Width of channel = (65 x 20) + (67 x 6) = 1702
mm Width of screen = 1700 mm

Sizing calculation of aeration tank:

Bod in the feed sewage = 100 ppm

No. of aeration tank = 2
Average flow = 360/2 = 180 kld
Total bod load to the aeration tank = 15 x 24 x 100 = 36
kgs Let mlss = 2000 mg/l, f/m=0.15
Volume of tank required = (Q x bod load) / (fm x mlss)
= (180 x 100)/0.15 x 2000
= 60 m3
Assume liquid depth = 3.5 m
Area = 60/3.5=17.143 m2
Tank size provided = 4.5 x 4.5 x 3.7
So, Volume of tank = 75 m3

Check for aeration period/hydraulic retention time:

Hydraulic retention time t = 75 x 24/180 = 10 h

So, the tank retention time is more than the required time.

Sizing calculation for sludge drying beds

Maximum design flow rate = 45 m3/h, 360 kld
Total feed suspended solid = 250 ppm
Total outlet suspended solid = 50 ppm
Load to the clarifier = 250-50 = 200 ppm
Sludge generated per day = 360x 200/1000
= 72 kg/day
Solid content in the feed= 3%
Specific gravity of the sludge= 1.015
 42

Volume of sludge= ((72/0.03)/(1000x1.015))

= 2.36 m3
For Rourkela weather condition, the beds get dried out about 7 days
No. of cycles per year = 365/7
= 52 cycles
Period of each cycles = 7 days
Volume of sludge per cycle = 2.36 x 7
= 16.55 m3/cycle
Spreading a layer 1m per cycle,
Area of bed required = 16.55/1
= 16.55 m2
So area of 16.55 m2 for 2 drying beds is provided for the above system
Hence, Sludge Drying Bed has dimensions of 4.5 m x 4.5 m x 1 m of
two numbers.

Terms used in the model Full Form

CW Collection Well
CBD Coarse Bubble Diffusion
AT Aeration Tank
PCT Primary Clarifier Tank
SCT Secondary Clarifier Tank
SDB Sludge Drying Bed
 43

Fig 5.1 Top View of Sewage Treatment Plant

 44

Fig 5.2 Layout of Sewage Treatment Plant

 45

CHAPTER 6

TIMELINE OF THE PROJECT

 46

6.1 Timeline (Milestones) of the project:

 47

CHAPTER 7

CONCLUSION
 48

7.1 Conclusion:


The average ranges of physical, chemical and biological
 
characteristics of waste water quality are experimented and found
out.

  from 7.8 to 8.01. The Turbidity ranged from 10 to
The pH ranges
120 NTU.
 
 The value of Turbidity was found to be within the permissible limit.

 The Chloride and Alkalinity were in the range of 3.5 to 120 mg/l
and 15 to 80 mg/l respectively.
  The Total Iron content was in the range of 0 to 3 mg/l.
  The Zinc content was in the limits of 0.1 to 2 mg/l.


  Copper content ranged from 0 to 0.2 mg/l.



  Potassium was present in the limits of 2 to 12 mg/l.


 
The parameters studied resemble the waste water quality.

Total amount of waste water treated = 0.423 mld.

 Dimension of the collection pit is calculated to be 4 m in diameter

 and 5 m depth of the cylindrical tank.
  A bar screen of width 1.7 m is provided.
  Dimension of the aeration tank is 4.5 x 4.5 x 3.7 m3
 Dimensions of Sludge Drying Bed are 4.5 m x 4.5 m x 1 m of two
numbers.
 49

CHAPTER 8

REFERENCES
 50

8.1 References:

1. AMERICAN HEALTH ASSOCIATION , 1985 : STANDARD

METHODS FOR THE EXAMINATION OF WATER & WASTE
WATER - (16th edition )

2. ORHON.D. ATES. E., SOZEN. S. , 1997 : CHARACTERIZATION

AND COD FRACTIONATION OF DOMESTIC WASTE WATER,
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION 95(2), 191 - 204

3. GERARD KIELY, 2007 , ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING

4. KHANNA PUBLISHER, GARG S.K. , 1976 : ENVIRONMENTAL

ENGINEERING - (2010 edition)

5. S. I. KHAN AND N. KAMAL: ASSESSMENT OF TREATMENT

EFFICIENCY BY QUANTITATIVE RECOVERY OF INDICATOR
BACTERIAAND PATHOGENS IN SEWAGE EFFLUENTS. 129.
DEPARTMENT OF MICROBIOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF DHAKA,
BANGLADESH.

6. IS: 3025 (PART 10) – 1984 METHODS OF SAMPLING AND

TEST (PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL) FOR WATER AND WASTE
WATER, PART 10 - TURBIDITY.

7. IS: 3025 (PART 15) – 1984, METHODS OF SAMPLING AND

TEST (PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL) FOR WATER AND WASTE
WATER, PART 15 - TOTAL RESIDUE (TOTAL SOLIDS —
DISSOLVED AND SUSPENDED).

8. IS: 3025 (PART 16) – 1984, METHODS OF SAMPLING AND

TEST (PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL) FOR WATER AND WASTE
WATER, PART 16 - FILTERABLE RESIDUE (TOTAL
DISSOLVED SOLIDS).
 51

9. IS: 3025 (PART 21) - 1983, METHODS OF SAMPLING AND

TEST (PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL) FOR WATER AND WASTE
WATER, PART 21 - TOTAL HARDNESS).

10. IS: 3025 (Part 51) – 2001, METHODS OF SAMPLING AND TEST
(PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL) FOR WATER AND WASTE
WATER, PART 51 – CARBONATE AND BICARBONATE.

11. IS: 3025 (Part 22) – 1986, METHODS OF SAMPLING AND TEST
(PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL) FOR WATER AND WASTE
WATER, PART 22 - ACIDITY.

12. IS: 3025 (PART 32) - 1988, METHODS OF SAMPLING AND

TEST (PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL) FOR WATER AND WASTE
WATER, PART 32 - CHLORIDE (FIRST REVISION).

13. IS: 3025 (Part 22) – 1986, METHODS OF SAMPLING AND TEST
(PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL) FOR WATER AND WASTE
WATER, PART 22 - ACIDITY.

14. IS: 3025 (PART 23) – 1983, METHODS OF SAMPLING AND

TEST (PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL) FOR WATER AND WASTE
WATER, PART 23 - ALKALINITY.

15. IS:10500 DRAFT INDIAN STANDARD DRINKING WATER –

SPECIFICATION (Second Revision of IS 10500)

16. DUGAN, P.R. (1972). BIOCHEMICAL ECOLOGY OF WATER

POLLUTION. PLENUM PRESS LONDON, 159.

17. SHIKHAR FIRMAL, NIT ROURKELA, 2009: A STUDY ON THE

WATER QUALITY OF NIT ROURKELA.