Aids 32 739 PDF
Aids 32 739 PDF
Aids 32 739 PDF
a
Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, Yale University School of Medicine and Public Health, West Haven,
Connecticut, bWashington DC Veterans Affairs Medical Center and George Washington University School of Medicine and
Health Sciences, Washington, DC, cDepartment of Medicine (Infectious Diseases), Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology,
Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Center for Pharmacoepidemiology Research and Training, Perelman School of
Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, dEmory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, eVA
Connecticut Healthcare System and Yale School of Nursing, West Haven, Connecticut, and fIcahn School of Medicine at Mount
Sinai, New York City, New York, USA.
Correspondence to Amy C. Justice, MD, PhD, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, Yale University School of Medicine and Public
Health, 950 Campbell Avenue, Building 35a Room 2-212 (11-ACSLG), West Haven, CT 06516, USA.
Tel: +1 203 932 5711 x3541; fax: +1 203 937 4926; e-mail: [email protected]
Received: 21 September 2017; revised: 14 November 2017; accepted: 25 November 2017.
DOI:10.1097/QAD.0000000000001756
ISSN 0269-9370 Copyright Q 2018 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the
terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and
share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. 739
740 AIDS 2018, Vol 32 No 6
irrigation solutions; ceruminolytics; deodorants and higher scores being associated with a greater risk of
antiperspirants; and contact lens solutions from analyses. mortality. A five-point increase in VACS Index score is
Our analysis was restricted to medications, which were associated with a 20% increase in 5-year mortality risk (e.g.
filled on a chronic basis, defined as at least 90 consecutive hazard ratio of 1.2). Scores were determined using
days allowing for a 30-day refill window, consistent with laboratory values closest to the end of fiscal year 2009.
previous definitions [22].
Analyses
Days of medication receipt were calculated based on In bivariate analyses, we evaluated characteristics of HIVþ
prescription information, assuming the prescription was and uninfected individuals associated with non-antiretro-
taken as directed. Patients may have started a medication viral polypharmacy using a chi-square test and calculating
before fiscal year 2009 or continued them after fiscal year odds ratios for more than two and at least five non-
2009; we captured only days supplied within fiscal year antiretroviral polypharmacy. We used Cox proportional
2009. Medications were categorized according to VA hazard models to determine the association between non-
class. We calculated the mean number of unique non- antiretroviral medication count (and >2 and 5 thresholds
antiretroviral long-term medications received by each for non-antiretroviral polypharmacy), hospitalization, and
patient during fiscal year 2009 by summing the number of mortality adjusted for disease severity (as measured by the
days supplied for each medication and dividing the total VACS Index) and demographic factors. All statistical
by 365 days. Each component of co-formulated analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS
medications was counted separately. Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA).
uninfected individuals to be hospitalized (58 and 55%) or respectively, the 10 most commonly received medication
die (17 and 14%). classes were lipid-lowering medications (Table 1, 42 and
53%), ACE-inhibitors (26 and 35%), antidepressants (32
Common non-antiretroviral medications were similar in and 31%), gastric medications (19 and 33%), beta-
both groups. Among HIVþ and uninfected individuals, blockers (22 and 30%), nonopioid analgesics (19 and
Non-antiretroviral polypharmacy and adverse health outcomes Justice et al. 743
20
18
16
14
Percent of Paents 12
10
HIV+
8
Uninfected
6
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Non-ARV Medicaon Count
28%), calcium channel blockers (14 and 26%), diuretics polypharmacy among HIVþ than uninfected (30–
(15 and 22%), genitourinary agents (19 and 20%), and 60% increased risk for HIVþ versus 10% for uninfected).
hypoglycemic medications (11 and 22%). Of note, long-
term prescription opioids (17 and 21%) were commonly VACS Index scores were similarly and moderately
prescribed to both HIVþ and uninfected individuals and correlated with non-antiretroviral medication count
proton pump inhibitors, by far the most common gastric among HIVþ and uninfected (Spearman correlation
medications, were also commonly used for more than 90 HIVþ: 0.21 95% CI 0.19, 0.23; uninfected: 0.21 95% CI
days (19 and 32%), respectively. The distribution of non- 0.20, 0.22). VACS Index discriminated risk of hospitali-
antiretroviral medication count was fairly similar among zation (HIVþ C- statistic: 0.62 95%CI 0.61, 0.63;
HIVþ and uninfected with HIVþ having slightly lower uninfected C-statistic: 0.60, 95% CI 0.60, 0.60) and
counts (Fig. 1). Median (5th and 95th) non-antiretroviral mortality (HIVþ C-statistic: 0.72, 95% CI 0.71, 0.74;
medication count was 3 (1, 10) among HIVþ, and 4 (1, uninfected C-statistic: 0.70, 95% CI 0.70, 0.71) nearly as
11) among uninfected. well among uninfected as HIVþ.
Table 2. Association of characteristics with nonantiretroviral polypharmacy (more than two and at least five medications).
More than two At least five More than two At least five
Non-ARVs non-ARVs non-ARVs non-ARVs
Table 2 (continued )
More than two At least five More than two At least five
Non-ARVs non-ARVs non-ARVs non-ARVs
All bivariate odds ratios significant at P < 0.001 except as noted. HIVþ, sex P ¼ 0.98, uninfected, drug abuse and dependence P ¼ 0.006. ARV,
antiretroviral therapy.
additional non-antiretroviral medication for HIVþ and five non-antiretroviral polypharmacy demonstrated a
uninfected (hazard ratio 1.08, 95% CI 1.08–1.08, P for 43% increased risk of mortality among HIVþ and
interaction ¼ 0.99). uninfected (5: hazard ratio 1.43, 95% CI 1.36–1.50,
P for interaction ¼ 0.1).
Nonantiretroviral polypharmacy and mortality
In unadjusted analyses, more than two non-antiretroviral In unadjusted and adjusted analyses, compared with those
polypharmacy was associated with 68% increased risk of on two or fewer non-antiretroviral medications, we
mortality among HIVþ (Table 3, >2: hazard ratio 1.68, observed a dose–response association between non-
95% CI 1.50–1.89) and a 99% increased risk among antiretroviral polypharmacy and risk of mortality among
uninfected individuals (hazard ratio 1.99, 95% CI 1.86– HIVþ and uninfected (Fig. 2). Whenever non-antiretro-
2.14, P for interaction ¼ 0.01). Using the at least five viral medication count was modeled as a continuous
threshold in unadjusted analysis, polypharmacy was variable (Table 4), we observed a 5% increase in risk of
associated with an 83% increased risk of mortality in mortality with each additional non-antiretroviral medi-
both HIVþ and uninfected (P for interaction ¼ 0.1, 5: cation among HIVþ (hazard ratio 1.05, 95% CI 1.03–
hazard ratio : 1.83, 95% CI 1.75–1.82). 1.06), and a 7% increase among uninfected (hazard ratio
1.07, 95% CI 1.06–1.07).
In fully adjusted models, more than two non-antiretroviral
polypharmacy was associated with a 20% increased risk of
mortality among HIVþ (>2: hazard ratio 1.20, 95% CI Discussion
1.07–1.36) and a 49% increased risk among uninfected
(>2: hazard ratio 1.49, 95% CI 1.39–1.60, P for In this large cohort of HIVþ and demographically similar
interaction ¼ 0.002). The fully adjusted model of at least uninfected individuals, non-antiretroviral polypharmacy
Table 3. Unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios for nonantiretroviral therapies polypharmacy (more than two and at least five medications),
hospitalization, and mortality by HIV status.
Polypharmacy (more than two non-ARVs) Polypharmacy (at least five non-ARVs)
Hazard ratio 95% CI Hazard ratio 95% CI Hazard ratio 95% CI Hazard ratio 95% CI
Combined 1.68 1.63 1.73 1.51 1.47 1.55 1.69 1.65 1.73 1.52 1.49 1.56
HIVþ 1.72 1.62 1.83 1.50 1.41 1.60 1.73 1.64 1.83 1.53 1.45 1.62
Uninfected 1.67 1.62 1.73 1.50 1.45 1.55 1.69 1.64 1.73 1.51 1.47 1.55
Combined nab nab 1.83 1.75 1.92 1.43 1.36 1.50
HIVþ 1.68 1.50 1.89 1.20 1.07 1.36 1.79 1.62 1.97 1.32 1.20 1.46
Uninfected 1.99 1.86 2.14 1.49 1.39 1.60 1.86 1.77 1.96 1.45 1.37 1.52
Hazard ratios are expressed in terms of non-ARV polypharmacy using a more than two or a at least five medication threshold. Fully adjusted models
were adjusted for VACS Index score, age, sex, and race/ethnicity. ARV, antiretroviral therapy; CI, confidence interval. aInteraction between
polypharmacy, HIV, and hospitalization was not significant in any model.
b
Interaction between polypharmacy, HIV, and mortality was significant in more than two non-ARV models (unadjusted model P ¼ 0.01, adjusted
model P ¼ 0.002), but not in at least 5 models.
746 AIDS 2018, Vol 32 No 6
3.0 3.0
2.5 2.5
2.0 2.0
1.5 1.5
1.0
1.0 HIV+
0.5 0.5
Hazard Ratio
0.0 0.0
0 5 10 15 0 5 10 15
4.0 4.0
Mortality
3.5 3.5
3.0 3.0
2.5 2.5
2.0 2.0
1.5 1.5
1.0 1.0
0.5 0.5
0.0 0.0
0 5 10 15 0 5 10 15
Fig. 2. Association of nonantiretroviral medication count and adverse health outcomes. Fully adjusted estimates are adjusted for
VACS index, age, race/ethnicity, and sex. Models were stratified by HIV status. Solid circles represent HIVþ, hollow circles
represent uninfected individuals. ARV, antiretroviral.
Table 4. Unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratio of nonantiretroviral demonstrates a dose–response association with hospitali-
medication count (continuous measure), hospitalization and zation and mortality and neither severity of illness nor
mortality by HIV status.
demographic factors explain these associations. Short of a
Unadjusted Fully adjusted randomized trial, these results provide important evi-
Non-ARV medication Non-ARV medication dence that non-antiretroviral polypharmacy contributes
count count
to adverse health events among those aging with and
Hazard 95% Hazard 95% without HIV infection.
Outcome ratio CI ratio CI
Our study extends prior literature in several ways [2–5,7–
Hospitalizationa
Combined 1.10 1.09 1.10 1.08 1.08 1.08 10]. We had direct access to pharmacy-dispensing data in
HIVþ 1.10 1.09 1.10 1.08 1.07 1.09 a national system with generous pharmaceutical coverage.
Uninfected 1.12 1.09 1.15 1.08 1.07 1.08 As patients fail to fill many prescriptions, data on
Mortalityb
Combined nab nab
medication orders (prescriptions) are less informative than
HIVþ 1.11 1.10 1.11 1.05 1.03 1.06 dispensing data. We are also the first to consider the
Uninfected 1.27 1.20 1.34 1.07 1.06 1.07 association of non-antiretroviral polypharmacy with
actual clinical outcomes among HIVþ rather than
Hazard ratios are expressed in terms of risk associated with each
additional non-ARV medication. Fully adjusted models were adjusted potential drug interactions or other possible adverse
for VACS Index score, age, sex, and race/ethnicity. ARV, antiretroviral effects. We consider adverse associations with polyphar-
therapy; CI, confidence interval. macy using two potential thresholds for non-antiretrovi-
a
P for interaction between polypharmacy, HIV, and hospitalization ral polypharmacy (>2 and 5) and as a continuous
was not significant (adjusted model P ¼ 0.99).
b
P for interaction between polypharmacy, HIV, and mortality was measure (non-antiretroviral medication count). We are
significant (adjusted model P ¼ 0.04). the first to compare health outcomes associated with
Non-antiretroviral polypharmacy and adverse health outcomes Justice et al. 747
polypharmacy among HIVþ with demographically must be taken for the rest of the patient’s life. antiretroviral
similar uninfected individuals. Our hospitalization data initiation often precipitates polypharmacy a decade earlier
is completely parallel among HIVþ and uninfected and for HIVþ than uninfected individuals [6]. Antiretrovirals
include events occurring within the VA system, fee for interact with a wide range of common medications
service, and care supported by other United States including lipid-lowering agents, antihypertensives, anti-
governmental sources (Medicare and Medicaid). Simi- depressants, proton-pump inhibitors, and prescription
larly, VA mortality data are very complete [23]. Finally, a opioids [27]. Additionally, compared with uninfected
major innovation of our study is our ability to adjust for individuals, HIVþ had higher VACS Index scores
severity of illness using a widely validated and accurate indicating increased physiologic frailty and susceptibility
physiologic index. to drug injury.
Although many have suggested that the association For example, 18% of HIVþ in our sample were on a
between polypharmacy and adverse health outcomes is proton-pump inhibitor for more than 90 days. Most
because of confounding by indication – sicker patients protease inhibitors and several nonnucleoside reverse
take more medications – our analysis suggests otherwise. transcriptase inhibitors interact with proton-pump
The VACS Index is a widely validated, highly inhibitors [5]. In most circumstances, proton-pump
discriminating, physiologic index predictive of hospitali- inhibitors should not be prescribed for more than 30
zation and mortality among veterans with and without days. Further, proton-pump inhibitors are associated with
HIV infection [16–20]. The VACS Index meets or a growing list of serious adverse effects to which HIVþ
exceeds the discrimination of prior indices validated may have increased susceptibility including fragility
among older individuals [26]. Yet, the correlation fractures, cognitive difficulties, and malabsorption [28].
between the VACS Index and non-antiretroviral poly-
pharmacy was only moderate and full adjustment for the Some might argue that comorbid conditions among
Index, age, race/ethnicity, and sex did not ‘explain’ the HIVþ on antiretrovirals are undertreated. As observed in
association between non-antiretroviral polypharmacy and this study, non-antiretroviral medications are less com-
hospitalization or mortality. After these adjustments, non- monly dispensed to HIVþ than to uninfected individuals.
antiretroviral polypharmacy remained independently For example, HIVþ were less likely to receive lipid-
associated with hospitalization and mortality in a dose– lowering therapy for indicated cardiovascular disease
response manner. Thus, although demographic factors, prevention [29]. Whether this reflects a primary focus on
especially age, and severity of illness are associated with antiretrovirals, a judicious under use related to concerns
polypharmacy and health outcomes, neither appear to be about polypharmacy; lack of comfort with non-HIV care,
major confounders of the association between poly- or clinical oversight remains to be determined. Hundreds
pharmacy and adverse health outcomes. of trials have been conducted considering whether adding
a specific medication or set of medications improves
Instead, particular diagnoses (not all of which are associated outcomes, few interventions to reduce polypharmacy
with hospitalization or mortality), individual provider (deprescribe) have been tested. Most deprescribing trials
styles, and other factors not directly related to prognosis, failed to reduce medications because they are typically
may contribute more to polypharmacy than previously required to comply with disease-specific guidelines
appreciated. For example, diagnoses of hyperlipidemia or developed without consideration of multimorbidity or
gastroesophageal reflux roughly doubled the probability of polypharmacy [30]. For every medication to treat a
non-antiretroviral polypharmacy and medication-con- symptom that the trialists stopped, medications for
trolled hypertension increased the probability of non- primary and secondary prevention of disease were added.
antiretroviral polypharmacy more than five times. Impor- Only a randomized trial can determine whether
tantly, over 6 years of observation, none of these conditions deprescribing reduces hospitalization or mortality among
conferred an increased risk of mortality independent of those exposed to polypharmacy. Our analyses offer
non-antiretroviral medication count, VACS Index score, stronger evidence than previously reported, either among
and demographic factors (data not otherwise shown). Of HIV infected or the general population, that polyphar-
note, these associations were similar by HIV status macy may cause excess hospitalization and mortality. This
suggesting similar factors drive polypharmacy among evidence may help inform the equipoise necessary for
those with and without HIV infection and suggesting randomized trials of deprescribing among patients with
potential targets for future intervention. non-antiretroviral polypharmacy.
Likely mechanisms of injury from polypharmacy among Substantial work is needed to determine how best to
HIVþ and uninfected individuals include cumulative proceed. Although many studies in uninfected populations
toxicity, side effects, and drug–drug interactions [2,3]. As cite five medications as a critical threshold, no study has
those with HIV age, the problem of adverse health established the definitive threshold for non-antiretroviral
outcomes because of non-antiretroviral polypharmacy polypharmacy. An important strength of our analyses is that
may grow. Although antiretrovirals extend survival, they we considered two thresholds for non-antiretroviral
748 AIDS 2018, Vol 32 No 6
6. Edelman EJ, Gordon KS, Glover J, McNicholl IR, Fiellin DA, 19. Akgun KM, Tate JP, Pisani M, Fried T, Butt AA, Gibert CL, et al.
Justice AC. The next therapeutic challenge in HIV: polyphar- Medical ICU admission diagnoses and outcomes in human
macy. Drugs Aging 2013; 30:613–628. immunodeficiency virus-infected and virus-uninfected veter-
7. Hasse B, Ledergerber B, Furrer H, Battegay M, Hirschel B, ans in the combination antiretroviral era. Crit Care Med 2013;
Cavassini M, et al., Swiss HIV Cohort Study. Morbidity and 41:1458–1467.
aging in HIV-infected persons: the Swiss HIV cohort study. Clin 20. Tate JP, Brown ST, Rimland D, Rodriguez-Barradas M,
Infect Dis 2011; 53:1130–1139. Justice AC, Team VP. Comparison of VACS Index performance
8. Marzolini C, Back D, Weber R, Furrer H, Cavassini M, Calmy A, in HIV-infected and uninfected veterans from 2000 to 2010.
et al., Swiss HIV Cohort Study Members. Ageing with HIV: Poster presented at the18th International Workshop on HIV
medication use and risk for potential drug-drug interactions. Observational Databases (IWHOD), 27th March 2014, Sitges,
J Antimicrob Chemother 2011; 66:2107–2111. Spain.
9. Furler MD, Einarson TR, Walmsley S, Millson M, Bendayan R. 21. Fultz SL, Skanderson M, Mole LA, Gandhi N, Bryant K, Crystal S,
Polypharmacy in HIV: impact of data source and gender on Justice AC. Development and verification of a ‘virtual’ cohort
reported drug utilization. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2004; using the National VA Health Information System. Med Care
18:568–586. 2006; 44 (Suppl 2):S25–S30.
10. Ajuoga E, Sansgiry SS, Ngo C, Yeh RF. Use/misuse of over-the- 22. Edelman EJ, Gordon K, Becker WC, Goulet JL, Skanderson M,
counter medications and associated adverse drug events among Gaither JR, et al. Receipt of opioid analgesics by HIV-infected
HIV-infected patients. Res Social Adm Pharm 2008; 4:292–301. and uninfected patients. J Gen Intern Med 2012; 28:82–90.
11. Richardson K, Ananou A, Lafortune L, Brayne C, Matthews FE. 23. Cowper DC, Kubal JD, Maynard C, Hynes DM. A primer and
Variation over time in the association between polypharmacy comparative review of major US mortality databases. Ann
and mortality in the older population. Drugs Aging 2011; Epidemiol 2002; 12:462–468.
28:547–560. 24. Butt AA, McGinnis K, Rodriguez-Barradas MC, Crystal S, Sim-
12. Espino DV, Bazaldua OV, Palmer RF, Mouton CP, Parchman berkoff M, Goetz MB, et al., Veterans Aging Cohort Study. HIV
ML, Miles TP, Markides K. Suboptimal medication use and infection and the risk of diabetes mellitus. AIDS 2009;
mortality in an older adult community-based cohort: results 23:1227–1234.
from the Hispanic EPESE Study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci
2006; 61:170–175. 25. Goulet JL, Fultz SL, Rimland D, Butt A, Gibert C, Rodriguez-
13. Charlson ME, Ales KL, Simon R, MacKenzie R. Why predictive Barradas M, et al. Aging and infectious diseases: do patterns of
indexes perform less well in validation studies: is it magic or comorbidity vary by HIV status, age, and HIV severity? Clinical
methods? Arch Intern Med 1987; 147:2155–2161. infectious diseases: an official publication of the Infectious
14. Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comor- Diseases Society of America 2007; 45:1593–1601.
bidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. 26. Yourman LC, Lee SJ, Schonberg MA, Widera EW, Smith AK.
J Clin Epidemiol 1992; 45:613–619. Prognostic indices for older adults: a systematic review. JAMA
15. Lee SJ, Lindquist K, Segal MR, Covinsky KE. Development and 2012; 307:182–192.
validation of a prognostic index for 4-year mortality in older 27. Kantor ED, Rehm CD, Haas JS, Chan AT, Giovannucci EL.
adults. JAMA 2006; 295:801–808. Trends in prescription drug use among adults in the United
16. Tate JP, Justice AC, Hughes MD, Bonnet F, Reiss P, Mocroft A, States from 1999-2012. JAMA 2015; 314:1818–1831.
et al. An internationally generalizable risk index for mortality 28. Wilhelm SM, Rjater RG, Kale-Pradhan PB. Perils and pitfalls of
after one year of antiretroviral therapy. AIDS (London, Eng- long-term effects of proton pump inhibitors. Expert Rev Clin
land) 2013; 27:563–572. Pharmacol 2013; 6:443–451.
17. Justice AC, Modur SP, Tate JP, Althoff KN, Jacobson LP, Gebo 29. Freiberg MS, Leaf DA, Goulet JL, Goetz MB, Oursler KK, Gibert
KA, et al., NA-ACCORD and VACS Project Teams. Predictive CL, et al. The association between the receipt of lipid lowering
accuracy of the Veterans Aging Cohort Study index for mor- therapy and HIV status among veterans who met NCEP/ATP III
tality with HIV infection: a North American cross cohort criteria for the receipt of lipid lowering medication. J Gen
analysis. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2013; 62:149–163. Intern Med 2009; 24:334–340.
18. Akgun KM, Gordon K, Pisani M, Fried T, McGinnis KA, Tate JP, 30. Patterson SM, Hughes C, Kerse N, Cardwell CR, Bradley MC.
et al. Risk factors for hospitalization and medical intensive care Interventions to improve the appropriate use of polypharmacy
unit (MICU) admission among HIV infected Veterans. J Acquir for older people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;
Immune Defic Syndr 2013; 62:52–59. 5:CD008165.