One More Time: How Do You Motivate Employees - Frederick Herzberg
One More Time: How Do You Motivate Employees - Frederick Herzberg
One More Time: How Do You Motivate Employees - Frederick Herzberg
Herzberg
People are motivated through interesting work, challenges and increasing
responsibilities.
Motivating with a KITA: Kicking the person!
Both Negative KITA does not cause motivation, however it gets the results required to
complete a specific task.
3. Positive KITA
It is a system of rewards and incentives to get a task accomplished. Positive KITA is
NOT motivation either. The employer is no longer after your performance, but instead,
the employee himself is Kicking himself on the butt.
In the job environment, removing factors dealing with extreme dissatisfaction, does not
lead to achieving satisfaction. (Ex. Removing un-happiness in life, does not mean you
are now happy). The opposite of job satisfaction is not job dissatisfaction.
Hygiene Factors
Motivators Factors:
Achievement
Recognition
Work itself
Responsibility
Advancement
Growth
The motivation-hygiene theory suggest that work be enriched to bring about effective
utilization of personnel.
Job enrichment provide the opportunity for the employee psychological growth, while job
enlargement merely makes a job structurally bigger.
Job Loading
employers often reduce the employee contribution, rather than giving them opportunities
of growth, this is called Horizontal Job Loading
Job loading only increase the meaninglessness of the job. the employers does not really
engage the employee on more meaningful activities
Horizontal Job loading: enlarge the amount of work by adding more meaningless
activities.
Vertical Job loading: Providing motivational factors
As managers do not write down much information heard, the real strategic data bank of
the organization is not in the computer memory, but in the minds of its managers.
Managers experience what it’s called: “Dilemma of delegation”, which is, prefering to do
the task themselves as it would take longer to explain all details to a subordinate.
Computers seem not having influence on the work procedures of general managers.
Managers are overburdened with obligations yet cannot easily delegate their tasks. As a
result, they are driven to overwork and forced to do many tasks superficially.
Figurehead role: Managers are the head of the organization, and has to make
ceremonial duties. Ex. take an important client for lunch.
Leader: Managers are responsible for the people in their department. Ex.
Managers may be responsible for training new employees. Motivate and
encourage employees.
Liaison: Managers makes contact outside the vertical chain of command.
Informational Roles
Decisional Roles
Entrepreneur: the manager seeks to improve the unit and adapt it to changing
conditions in the environment. Ex. New product ideas.
Disturbance Handler: the manager involuntary response to pressures. Ex. an
important client goes bankrupt.
Resource Allocator: Managers decide who will get what. authorizing decisions
that concern the unit or assigning workload to employees. Analysing a project
before approving its budget.
Negotiator.
Coercive Power
This power lays on the Person’s perspective that the Other person can mediate for a
punishment against him. Ex. If the productivity decreased, he will be fired.
Legitimate Power
It is the power which stems from internalized values in the person, which dictates the
Other person has a legitimate right to influence him, and he has the obligation to accept
the influence. Ex. CEO in a company. President of a country.
Referent Power
The power has its basis in the identification of the person with the Other person. The
other person has the ability to influence P, even though P is not aware of this referent
power. P wants to follow O instructions. Ex. Charisma - Mother Teresa.
Expert Power
It is based on the knowledge or perception of knowledge perceived from P towards O in
a given area. Ex. Accept the advice from a Lawyer in a legal matter.
The Balanced Scorecard - Measures that Drive Performance -
Robert S. Kaplan & David P. Norton
Focusing only on existing financial accounting measures like ROI, earnings per share,
market share, etc. can give misleading signals for continuous improvement and
innovative activities in today’s hyper-competitive market
Balanced Scorecard - A set of measures that give top managers a fast but
comprehensive view of the business. The balanced scorecard includes financial
measures that tell the results of action already taken. And it complements it with
operational measures that are the drivers of future financial performance.
Customer’s concerns tend to fall into four categories: Time, quality, performance and
service, and cost.
Customer’s evaluations helps the company to see the customer’s perspective and adapt
their service accordingly.
Companies should articulate foals for time, quality, and performance and service and
then transmit these goals into measurements.
Excellent customer performance derives from processes, decisions and actions that
occur at all levels within the organization.
** Companies should also attempt to identify and measure their company's core
competencies, the critical technologies needed to ensure continues market leadership.
One constraint: The scorecard information is not timely; reports are generally a week
behind the company’s routine management meetings, and the measures would not be
yet linked to measures for managers and employees.
A company’s ability to innovate, improve, and learn is tied directly to the creation of
value.
Intense global competition requires that companies make continual improvements ato
their existing products and processes and have the ability to introduce entirely new
products.
Companies must find ways to increase market penetration and increase revenues and
margins.
If improved performance fails to be reflexed in the bottom line, managers should re-
examine the basic assumptions of their strategy and mission, since not all long-term
strategies are profitable.
** Layoffs are poor reward for past improvements and can damage the morale of
remaining workers, causing further improvement more difficult.
Conclusion
Even a balanced scorecard will not necessarily lead to better results.
The scorecard only translates strategy into measurable objectives.
Traditional systems try to control behaviour. while the balanced scorecard is
suited to the kind of organization many companies try to become.
It puts strategy and vision, not control, at the center.
Keep companies looking and moving forward rather than backwards.
Helps to create the conditions for growth.