Correlating Vapor Pressures and Heats of Solution For The Ammonium Nitrate-Water System An Enthalpy-Concentration Diagram PDF
Correlating Vapor Pressures and Heats of Solution For The Ammonium Nitrate-Water System An Enthalpy-Concentration Diagram PDF
Correlating Vapor Pressures and Heats of Solution For The Ammonium Nitrate-Water System An Enthalpy-Concentration Diagram PDF
With production of almost 3,000,000 sure of the system. Pressure readings a static method. The experimental
ton+. in the United States, am- were accurate to k 0.1 mm. Hg and data and those of the literature ( 1 , 3 , 8 )
monium nitrate is of outstanding im- temperature readings to f 0.05"C. Be- correlate well on the logarithmic-refer-
portance as a nitrogen fertilizer, more low 50°C. and above 65 wt.% ammo- ence substance plot. The basic equa-
recently as an explosive, and in other nium nitrate exdessive bumping of the tion when vapor pressure of the solu-
major uses. Properties of the ammonium liquid made measurements unreliable. tion is always taken at the same tem-
nitratewater system are very important The experimental data are shown in perature as vapor pressure of water is
in the design of equipment to produce
and use ammonium nitrate.
Table 1 and plotted in Figure 1 ac-
cording to the method previously de-
logP = m logP" c (1) +
While more complex systems involv- scribed (11), no point deviating by where m = LB/LQs
ing ammonium nitrate were being more than 1%from the line represent-
Slopes and intercepts of the straight
studied ( 4 ) , pressures were measured ing all the points.
above aqueous ammonium nitrate solu- lines were plotted vs. concentration in
tions; these were correlated with avail- Figure 2. Slopes derived from vapor-
DISCUSSION OF VAPOR-PRESSURE
able vapor-pressure data as the loga- pressure data were calculated by
DATA
rithms of the vapor pressures vs. the statistical means (16),slopes have also
vapor pressures of water at the same After completion of these determi- been calculated from heats of dilution
temperatures as previously described nations Campbell et d. ( 1 ) published data ( 2 , 1 0 ) .
(11). From the slope of the lines of similar vapor pressures determined by The slopes from the experimental
constant concentration, differential
heats of dilution were calculated, and TABLE1. EXPERIMENTAL
PARTIALPRESSURE
OF WATERABOVE
C O N S T R U C T I O N OF THE
ENTHALPY-CONCENTRATION
DIAGRAM
a
2b.
Gerlach ( 5 , 8 , 9 ) gives the boiling
points at 760 mm. also for 95 and 96
wt.% ammonium nitrate solutions. ' .8
.9
These may be used to estimate the 40 10 20 30 40 50 6070 00 90 100
pressures above the solution at concen- WEIGHT PERCENT NH,NO,
trations higher than 90 wt.% by ex-
trapolating the. slope m in Figure 2n
Fig. 2. The upper curve represents the intercept C of the vapor pressure
to the respective composition and then Equation (1) as a functioh of the ammonium nitrate Concentration. These
calculating C from Equation ( 1 ) to values from Table 2 are all less than zero and hence are negative.
extend the correlation of Figure 2b. The lower curve refers to the slope m of the vapor pressure Equation (1)
Equation ( 1 ) can then be used to cal- as a function of the ammonium nitrate concentration. o This investigation,
culate partial pressures at other con- 0 Campbell e t a/. ( I ) , o Calculated from heats of dilution 12, IO), 0
ditions, also above 90 wt.% ammonium Gerlach 1 5 8 , 9).
H , = x A H ' A + x B H B + x A q . (4)
Here, instead of the enthalpy of the 160
130
z I20
For many systems of partial miscibil- P
ity, such as salt-water systems, only I-
Equations ( 4 ) and (5) can be used. $ 110
TABLE
3.
Enthalpies for solid LL
0
NHINO, in kcal./kg.-mole
ammonium nitrate *
a 'O
wt. % 10 10.06 16.54 22.26 25.52 30.30 33.30 ' 35.70 i 4.01
NHhNOs x.42 20 20.06 25.99 30.63 34.61 37.79 40.19 41.98 i,5240&-_ 7 .a
30 30.04 36.24 39.34 42.71 45.21 47.06 48.27 48.70 i 12.24
2.20 0.00186 40 40.02 44.67 48.06 50.81 52.76 53.95 54.55 54.40 i 53.61 21.06
5.0 0.00378 50 49.99 54.01 56.76 s e . ~ 60.24 60.82 60.83 60.09 +~~;,- 24.67
10.0 0.00687 60 59.97 63.34 65.48 66.99 67.73 67.71 67.11 65.78 63.81 i 61.44 28.37
20.0 0.01240 70 69.98 72.72 74.22 75.11 75.22 74.60 73.40 71.48 68.93 65.97 32.10
30.0 0.01760 a0 80.01 111.10 82.W 83.24 82.73 81.50 79.70 77.36 74.05 i 70.50 35.91
40.0 0.02195 90 90.07 91.51 91.75 91.39 90.25 88.40 86.01 82.89 79.17 i-72,.2--, 43.33
50.0 0.02525 100 100.2 100.99 ioo.58 99.57 97.a 95.36 92.34 88.61 t14.29 79.57 i 46.74
60.0 0.02758 110 110.3 110.43 109.38 107.75 105.37 102.29 98.66 94.34 89.41 84.10 ';50.13
70.0 0.02785 UO U0.4 119.88 118.18 1l5.92 lXZ.91 109.22 104.97 100.04 94.53 88.63 i53.54
80.0 0.02530 130 130.6 U9.40 l27.06 124.14 l2O.Y 116.18 111.3'2 105.78 99.67 93.17 t69.78
90.0 0.01900 140 140.8 138.93 135.94 132.37 l28.10 123.15 117.67 111.53 104.81 97.72 i 73.18
I
150 151.0 148.46 145.81 l40.61 l35.70 W.ll 124.01 117.26 109.86 102.25 ;76.58
160 161.3 158.08 153.76 148.W 143.34 137.13 l30.39 123.02 115.10 106.81 79.96
First the enthalpy of a 9.09 mole % 170 171.6 167.69 162.71 157.19 150.98 144.14 136.78 128.78 120.24 111.35 JmmfP-
solution at 25°C. is calculated: 180 181.9 177.31 171.66 165.48 158.62 151.13 143.15 134.54 125.39 115.89 105.48
Hydrocarbon vapor-liquid equilibria are expressed in terms of K values, which ore functions
of composition, as well as pressure and temperature. The composition effect in the liquid phase
is calculated by the Hildebrand-Scatchord equation for regular solutions. The parometers in
this equation, called solubility parameters, can be calculated simply from heat of vaporization
for the heavier hydrocarbons, but an indirect method of calculation must be used for the
lighter components. Solubility parameters for hydrogen, methane, ethane, and propane were
computed from gas-solubility data in several hydrocarbon solvents a t various temperatures and
pressures. This computation also yielded simultaneously the fugacities of the hypothetical
liquid-standard states.
The results presented are not complete for practical applications, owing to the scarcity of
suitable solubility data, especial$ a t high temperatures and pressures. However solubility param-
eters appear to give the right liquid-phase corrections in the correlation and prediction of
hydrocarbon phase equilibria. Calculated K values for light hydrocarbons in paraffinic, naph-
thenic, and aromatic absorption oils ore compared with experimental results. The average
deviation for the forty-two values tested is 13%.
The composition dependence of the carbon systems has been frequently of hydrocarbons, like the aliphatics,
vaporization equilibrium ratio in hydro- neglected in practical large deviations are encountered for
mixtures composed of different classes
While the comPosition-indePendent ~~