FCM Exam 2017 Assignment

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Exam 2017 Assignment

Group: Mads Aagaard, Bogdan Şipoş, Niels Sunddal Conradsen, Gabriela Lasauri

A.1. What is the internal rate of return for this investment? Explain what information
you can draw from analyzing this.

The internal rate of return for this investment will be 12%. This means the discount rate for the
investment can be up to 12%, in order for the resulting net present value to be at 0. However, in the case
of the discount rate being at 12%, the project would be at a high risk, since there would be no room for
the cash flow to be changed.
For the investment to be considered attractive, the discount rate should be at around 10%, meaning that
the discount rate can increase with approximately 16% so that the net present value is 0.

A.2. Does the investment satisfy the company´s requirement of a return of 5% per year?
Why will a company set up such a requirement? And would you consider this an
important decision-making technique for the company? Why / why not?

The accounting rate of return that the company requires is 5% per year, and the accounting rate of return
from the investment is at 6%. Thus, the investment satisfies the company’s requirement.
The company would set up such a requirement to asses the compensation for the level of risk, which is
also called the hurdle rate.
We would not consider this an important decision-making technique for the company, since this
technique does not take the time value of money into account. Furthermore, this technique does not
include the cash flow occurring during the investment period.
Exam 2017 Assignment

B.1. Would you recommend Trespa International to invest in the new electric forklift
truck? Base your argumentation on both financial and non-financial data.

We would not recommend Trespa International to invest in the new electric forklift truck, since the
company would be loosing financial resources, due to the negative net present value, which is calculated
to be at approximately -15000 €. Additionally, the low internal rate of return is not optimal, since it is at
low level of 5%, as a result of the negative net present value. Negative net present value is also supported
by the internal rate of return being less that the discount rate.
However, this project would be well fitting with the values in Trespa’s License to Operate, such as
“Sustainability and the preservation of the environment” and “Health and safety of its employees and the
local community.”. Additionally, this would be a good investment in the Corporate Social Responsibility,
which would increase the overall company’s value, and the company could be a potential first mover for
going green and switching from diesel to electric forklifts.
In conclusion, the financial deficit is too great even when non-financial factors are taken into account. If
the net present value would have been at 0, the project could have been taken into consideration due to
the non-financial benefits.

You might also like