Report On Grievance Handling: Industrial Relations Assignment
Report On Grievance Handling: Industrial Relations Assignment
Report On Grievance Handling: Industrial Relations Assignment
Every employee has certain expectations, which he thinks must be fulfilled by the organization he is
working for. When the organization fails to do this he develops a feeling of dissatisfaction. When an
employee feels something is unfair in the organization he is said to have a grievance. An aggrieved
employee is a potent source of indiscipline and bad-working.
Dissatisfaction: Anything that disturbs an employee, whether or not the unrest is expressed
in words.
Complaint: A spoken or written dissatisfaction brought to the attention of the supervisor or
the shop steward.
Grievance: A complaint that has been formally presented to a management representative
or to a union official.
Features of Grievance
a) A grievance refers to any form of discontent or dissatisfaction with any aspect of the organisation.
b) The dissatisfaction must arise out of employment and not due to personal or family problems.
c) The discontent can arise out of real or imaginary reasons. When the employee feels that injustice
has been done to him, he has a grievance. The reasons for such a feeling may be valid or invalid,
legitimate or irrational, justifiable or ridiculous.
d) The discontent may be voiced or unvoiced. But it must find expression in some form. However,
discontent per se is not a grievance. Initially, the employee may complain orally or in writing. If this
not looked into promptly, the employee feels a sense of lack of justice. Now the discontent grows
and takes the shape of a grievance.
a) Economic: Wage fixation, overtime, bonus, wage revision, etc. Employees may feel that they are
paid less when compared to others.
b) Work Environment: Poor physical conditions of workplace, tight production norms, defective
tools and equipment, poor quality of materials, unfair rules, lack of recognition, etc.
c) Supervision: Relates to the attitudes of the supervisor towards the employee such as perceived
notions of bias, favouritism, nepotism, caste affiliations, regional feelings, etc.
d) Work group: Employee is unable to adjust with his colleagues; suffers from feelings of neglect,
victimisation and becomes an object of ridicule and humiliation, etc.
e) Miscellaneous: These include issues relating to certain violations in respect of promotions, safety
methods, transfer, disciplinary rules, fines, granting leave, medical facilities, etc.
Grievances
All these causes should be investigated to achieve the following twin objectives:
Effects of Grievance
Grievances, if they are not identified and redressed, may affect adversely the workers, managers and
the organisation. The effects are:
1. On production include:
Low quality of production.
Low quality of production and productivity.
Increase in the wastage of material, spoilage/leakage of machinery.
Increase in the cost of production per unit.
2. On the employees:
Increases the rate of absenteeism and turnover.
Reduces the level of commitment, sincerity and punctuality.
Increases the incidence of accidents.
Reduces the level of employee morale.
3. On the managers:
Strains the superior-subordinate relations.
Increases the degree of supervision, control and follow up.
Increases in discipline cases.
Increase in unrest and thereby machinery to maintain industrial peace.
Discovery of Grievances
Grievances can be uncovered in a number of ways. Gossip and grapevine offer vital clues about
employee grievances. Ripe boxes, open door policies periodic interviews, exit surveys could also be
undertaken to uncover the mystery surrounding grievances.
Gripe boxes: A gripe box may be kept at prominent locations in the factory for lodging
anonymous complaints pertaining to any aspect relating to work. Since the complaint need
not reveal his identity, he can express his feelings of injustice or discontent frankly and
without any fear of victimisation.
Open door policy: This is a kind of walk-in-meeting with the manager when the employee
can express his feelings openly about any work-related grievance. The manager can cross-
check the details of the complaint through various means at his disposal.
Exit interview: Employees usually leave their current jobs due to dissatisfaction or better
prospects outside. If the manager tries sincerely through an exit interview, he might be able
to find out the real reasons why ‘X’ is leaving the organisation. To elicit valuable information,
the manager must encourage the employee to give a correct picture so as to rectify the
mistakes promptly. If the employee is not providing fearless answers, he may given a
questionnaire to fill up and post the same after getting all his dues cleared from the
organisation where he is currently employed.
Opinion surveys: Surveys may be conducted periodically to elicit the opinions of employees
about the organisation and its policies.
According to Jackson (2000), further benefits that will accrue to both the employer and
employees are as follows:
Clause 15 of the Model Standing Orders in the Schedule of the Industrial Employment
(Standing Orders) Act, 1946, specified that-
“All complaints arising out of the employment, including those relating to unfair treatment
or wrongful action on the part of the employer or his agent, shall be submitted to the
manager or other person specified in his behalf with the right of appeal to the employer.”
The Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1982, provides for the reference of certain
individual disputes to grievance settlement authorities. Section 9C of the amendment
stipulates that in which one hundred or more workmen are employed or have been
employed on nay one day in the preceding 12 months, the employer shall set-up a time-
bound grievance redressal procedure.
• There should be a statutory backing for the formulation of an effective grievance procedure
which should be simple, flexible, less cumbersome and more or less on the lines of the
Model Grievance Procedure.
• A grievance procedure should be such that it gives a sense of satisfaction to the individual
worker, ensures reasonable exercise of authority to the manager, and a sense of
participation to the unions.
• The constitution of grievance committee Should have a provision that in case a unanimous
decision is not possible, the unsettled grievance may be referred to arbitration.
3. Processing of Grievance
Aggrieved employee shall just present his grievance in person to the person designated
and the answer should be given within 48 hrs.
If the worker is not satisfied with the answer, he, along with one departmental
representative, will represent his grievance to the department head. He will give his
judgment in 3 days or state the reason for the delay.
If he is not satisfied, then he may be requested to refer the case to the grievance
committee. The grievance committee will make a recommendation within 7 days. The
management has to implement it.
If even, then he remains unsatisfied, he can report the matter to higher tier of
management for revision
If the worker is still not satisfied with the decision then the union may ask for voluntary
arbitration, the decision of which will be binding on both the parties.
Define the Problem: Instead of trying to deal with a vague feeling of discontent, the problem
should be defined properly. Sometime the wrong complaint is given. By effective listening,
one can make sure that a true complaint is voiced.
Get the Facts: Facts should be separated from fiction. Though grievances result in hurt
feelings, the effort should be to get the facts behind the feelings. There is need for a proper
record of each grievance.
Analyse and Decide: Decisions on each of the grievances will have a precedent effect.
Grievance settlements provide opportunities for managements to correct themselves, and
thereby come closer to the employees. Horse-trading in grievance redressal due to union
pressures may temporarily bring union leadership closer to the management, but it will
surely alienate the workforce away from the management.
Follow up: Decisions taken must be followed up earnestly. They should be promptly
communicated to the employee concerned. If a decision is favourable to the employee, his
immediate boss should have the privilege of communicating the same.
Some of the common pitfalls that managements commit in grievance handling relate to
stopping the search for facts too soon, expressing a management opinion before gathering
full facts, failing to maintain proper records, arbitrary exercise of executive discretion,
settling wrong grievances.
Torrington & Hall refer to four key features of a grievance handling procedure, which are
discussed below-
Fairness: Fairness is needed not only to be just but also to keep the procedure viable. If
employees develop the belief that the procedure is only a sham, then its value will be lost,
and other means sought to deal with the grievances.
Facilities for representation: Representation, e.g., by a shop steward, can be of help to the
individual employee who lacks the confidence or experience to take on the management
single-handedly. However, there is also the risk that the presence of the representative
produces a defensive management attitude, affected by a number of other issues on which
the manager and shop steward may be at loggerheads.
Procedural steps: Steps should be limited to three. Otherwise, this will only lengthen the
time taken to deal with matter and will soon bring the procedure into disrepute.
Promptness: Promptness is needed to avoid the bitterness and frustration that can come
from delay. Furthermore, the manager whose decision is being questioned will have a
difficult time until the matter is settled.
Every organisation should have a systematic grievance procedure in order to redress the
grievances effectively. Unattended grievances may culminate in the form of violent conflicts
later on. The grievance procedure, to be sound and effective should possess certain pre-
requisites:
Conformity with statutory provisions: Due consideration must be given to the prevailing
legislation while designing the grievance handling procedure.
Un-ambiguity: Every aspect of the grievance handling procedure should be clear and
unambiguous. All employees should know whom to approach first when they have a
grievance, whether the complaint should be written or oral, the maximum time in which the
redressal is assured, etc. The redressing official should also know the limits within which he
can take the required action.
Simplicity: The grievance handling procedure should be simple and short. If the procedure is
complicated it may discourage employees and they may fail to make use of it in a proper
manner.
Promptness: The grievance of the employee should be promptly handled and necessary
action must be taken immediately. This is good for both the employee and management,
because if the wrong doer is punished late, it may affect the morale of other employees as
well.
Training: The supervisors and the union representatives should be properly trained in all
aspects of grievance handling before hand or else it will complicate the problem.
Follow up: The Personnel Department should keep track of the effectiveness and the
functioning of grievance handling procedure and make necessary changes to improve it from
time to time.