Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 184 views

    G.R. No. 173637 - Speedy TRial and Double Jeopardy

    Uploaded by

    lr dagaang
    The accused was charged with falsifying a public document for claiming ownership of a sunken boat he recovered from a river. However, the facts presented were consistent with good faith on the accused's part. The boat had been submerged for over a year, was obstructing navigation, and was left in the accused's care after being removed. Without determining civil ownership through further investigation, it could not be proven the accused untruthfully claimed ownership in the document. The court reversed the conviction, finding the accused could have lawfully acquired ownership of abandoned property.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    G.R. No. 173637 - Speedy TRial and Double Jeopardy

    Uploaded by

    lr dagaang
    184 views3 pages
    The accused was charged with falsifying a public document for claiming ownership of a sunken boat he recovered from a river. However, the facts presented were consistent with good faith on the accused's part. The boat had been submerged for over a year, was obstructing navigation, and was left in the accused's care after being removed. Without determining civil ownership through further investigation, it could not be proven the accused untruthfully claimed ownership in the document. The court reversed the conviction, finding the accused could have lawfully acquired ownership of abandoned property.

    Original Description:

    Speedy TRial and Double Jeopardy

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The accused was charged with falsifying a public document for claiming ownership of a sunken boat he recovered from a river. However, the facts presented were consistent with good faith on the accused's part. The boat had been submerged for over a year, was obstructing navigation, and was left in the accused's care after being removed. Without determining civil ownership through further investigation, it could not be proven the accused untruthfully claimed ownership in the document. The court reversed the conviction, finding the accused could have lawfully acquired ownership of abandoned property.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    184 views3 pages

    G.R. No. 173637 - Speedy TRial and Double Jeopardy

    Uploaded by

    lr dagaang
    The accused was charged with falsifying a public document for claiming ownership of a sunken boat he recovered from a river. However, the facts presented were consistent with good faith on the accused's part. The boat had been submerged for over a year, was obstructing navigation, and was left in the accused's care after being removed. Without determining civil ownership through further investigation, it could not be proven the accused untruthfully claimed ownership in the document. The court reversed the conviction, finding the accused could have lawfully acquired ownership of abandoned property.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 3

    G.R. No.

    L-3247 March 5, 1907 -


    UNITED STATES v. ANGELO SAN
    JOSE<br /><br />007 Phil 604 :
    MARCH 1907 - PHILIPPINE
    SUPREME COURT
    JURISPRUDENCE -
    CHANROBLES VIRTUAL LAW
    LIBRARY
    GOOD FAITH OF ACCUSED. — A conviction for falsification of a public
    document by a private person will not be sustained when the facts found are
    consistent with good faith on the part of the accused.
    The accused was charged and convicted in the Court of First Instance of the city
    of Manila of the offense of the falsification of a public document. His employer,
    under contract with the municipality, raised from an estero a sunken banca
    which was obstructing navigation. It came up broken into two or three pieces,
    which were put ashore on the bank and kept there two months under care of a
    watchman. No owner or claimant for the banca appearing was told by his
    employer to "Go ahead and take charge of it." It was taken to a shipyard in
    Malabon and there rebuilt, the parts missing or unsound being supplied from
    other old vessels, the whole costing 250 pesos, paid by the accused, its value
    when finished being, according to the evidence before us, 300 pesos. Later it was
    recognized in the river by an agent of the original owner, Francisca Pascual, who
    reported it to the customs authorities and it was seized as her stolen property. It
    appeared that both the proper number and the license number of the original
    banca had been obliterated, but certain of the figures were plain enough to
    indicate that they may have corresponded with these numbers. Several witnesses
    for the prosecution testified to the identity of the banca, although slightly
    changed in dimensions.

    In order to secure his license the accused, when the repairs were finished, filed
    with the custom-house authorities his affidavit in the following
    form:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

    "PHILIPPINE CUSTOMS SERVICE.


    "OATH OF OWNER OF VESSEL.

    "PORT OF MANILA, Manila, P. I.

    "I, Angelo San Jose, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I am the owner of the
    vessel called the banca No. 17559 and that said vessel was built in the year 1905,
    at Malabon, Rizal, P.I., and is a banca of 11.45 gross tons and 11.45 net tons, has
    no decks and no masts, her length is 20.55 ms., her breadth 2.61 ms., her depth
    is 0.89, and that said vessel is engaged in legitimate trade.

    (Signed) "ANGELO SAN JOSE, Owner."cralaw virtua1aw library

    "Sworn to and subscribed before me this 23 day of January, 1905.

    (Signed) "CHAS. STEINHILBER.

    "(Empowered to administer oaths under the provisions of section 21, Act No.
    355.)"

    This is claimed to be the public document for the falsification of which he is


    prosecuted.

    Be the document public, official, or private, this is a question which it does not
    seem necessary to decide at present, considering the point raised by the case; the
    important thing is the accusation of falsity — the failure to adhere to the truth in
    the narration of facts. This is the very fact that can be considered as proven, and
    it can not be presumed. In this criminal case, it can not be established that the
    accused was untruthful in calling himself the owner, for with only the proofs
    herein submitted, it does not appear whether at the date of the document the
    owner of the banca was the person signing, or that the ownership continued the
    same until the conversion and use substantiated. For, it must be remembered
    that the banca was submerged in the Pasig River and obstructed its flow, and
    that the local authorities had contracted for the removal of the obstruction, and,
    furthermore, when the pieces were removed the contractor left them at the
    disposition of the accused, who was one of the workmen, and the accused then
    reconstructed the banca by the use of new material where the old was lacking.

    On these facts it would be proper to first determine in a civil suit the ownership
    of the thing so rebuilt and whether it had acquired the character of abandoned
    property under article 460 of the Civil Code. Heed should be given to the
    decisive character of article 88 of the Law of Waters, August 3, 1866. It
    says:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

    "Sunken objects in public streams continue to belong to their owners, but if not
    raised during one year, they become the property of the persons who raise them
    with the permission of the public authorities. If they offer an obstruction to the
    flow of water or navigation, the public authorities shall grant to the owners a
    reasonable time within which to use their right, on the expiration of which they
    may be raised as abandoned."cralaw virtua1aw library

    Without having investigated these facts, involving a preliminary question, it is


    impossible a priori to pronounce the accused a criminal, guilty of falsehood
    because he made a statement which may in fact be perfectly true and lawful and
    at the same time, in an indirect way, to restore to the original owner of the
    property which had already been lost by abandonment. The judgment appealed
    from is, therefore, reversed, and the defendant acquitted, with the costs de
    oficio.

    After the expiration of ten days let judgment be entered in accordance herewith
    and ten days thereafter the cause remanded to the court from whence it came for
    proper action. So ordered.

    Arellano, C.J., Torres, Mapa, Johnson, and Willard, JJ., concur.

    You might also like