Appellants Motion To Strike Bad Brief

IN THE FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
JOHN P. CARROLL,
Plaintiff/Appellant,
v. CASE NO.: 1D10-3850

L.T. CASE: 2009 CA 002021
WATERSOUND BEACH COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION, INC., WATERCOLOR
COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC.,
SANDRA MATTESON, DAVID LILIENTHAL,
RONALD VOELKER, MARY JOULE,
JOHN DOE AND JANE DOE,
Defendants/Appellees.
______________________________/
ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT

OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT,
IN AND FOR WALTON COUNTY, FLORIDA
CASE NUMBER 2009 CA 002021
___________________________________________________________________
APPELLAT'S MOTIO TO STRIKE APPELLEES WATERSOUD AD

MATTESO’S BAD BRIEF
___________________________________________________________________
John P. Carroll, Pro Se

Box 613524
WaterSound, FL 32461
Telephone 850-231-5616
Facsimile 850-622-5618
[email protected]
COMES NOW APPELLANT JOHN P. CARROLL, pursuant Florida Rules of
Appellate Procedure 9.300 (a) and states that the Appellees Answer Brief is a typical
1DCA bad brief:
1. On September 17, 2010 Appellee’s WaterSound Beach and Matteson filed
their Answer Brief (R 1). No other parties filed an Answer Brief.
2. The Appellees chose to include a Statement of the Case (R 1 at pages 1 –
4).
3. Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.210 (c) gave Appellees the option
of not including the Statement of the Case. Appellees went out of their way to include
their Statement.
4. Accordingly, Appellees triggered Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure
9.210 (b) (3).
5. Appellees attempted to mislead this Court about the details and
progression of the case at the Lower Tribunal level. Appellees didn’t bother to provide
an Appendix and made no references to the Record during their Statement of the Case
(R 1 at pages 1 – 4).
6. There is one record reference made by the Appellees, and it is contained
in an improperly submitted footnote (font size) wherein Appellees attempt to explain
why they would not allow the Appellant or the Judicial Assistant at the Lower Tribunal
level to schedule a hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (R 1 at page

2).
7. That footnote and record reference is also misleading. The actual Record
reference should read T 7 which is the Appellees own words in opposite to their own
footnote assertion.
8. Only this Court and the Appellant will be prejudiced if this Motion is not
granted.
For the above mentioned reasons, Appellant Carroll respectfully requests the 1st
District Court of Appeals Strike the Appellees Answer Brief.
Respectfully submitted,
_____________________________
John P. Carroll, pro se
Box 613524
(850) 231-5616 - phone
(850) 622-5618- fax
[email protected]
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been
furnished to Christopher L. George, Esq., PO Box 1034, Mobile, AL 36633 and to
Mark D. Davis, Esq., 694 Baldwin Ave. Suite 1, PO Box 705, DeFuniak Springs, FL
32435, and to Gary Shipman, Esq., 1414 County Highway 283 South, Suite B, Santa
Rosa Beach, FL 32459, Attorneys for Appellees electronically this 6th day of October,
2010.
_____________________________
John Carroll, pro se
Box 613524
(850) 231-5616 - phone
(850) 622-5618- fax
[email protected]
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIACE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the lettering in this brief is Times New Roman 14-
point Font and complies with the font requirements of Florida Rule of Appellate
Procedure 9.210(a)(2).
_____________________________
John Carroll, pro se
Box 613524
(850) 231-5616 - phone
(850) 622-5618- fax
[email protected]
IN THE FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
JOHN P. CARROLL,
Plaintiff/Appellant,
v. CASE NO.: 1D10-3850

L.T. CASE: 2009 CA 002021
WATERSOUND BEACH COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION, INC., WATERCOLOR
COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC.,
SANDRA MATTESON, DAVID LILIENTHAL,
RONALD VOELKER, MARY JOULE,
JOHN DOE AND JANE DOE,
Defendants/Appellees.
______________________________/
ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT

OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT,
IN AND FOR WALTON COUNTY, FLORIDA
CASE NUMBER 2009 CA 002021
___________________________________________________________________
APPELLAT'S APPEDIX TO MOTIO TO STRIKE BAD BRIEF

___________________________________________________________________
John P. Carroll, Pro Se

Box 613524
Telephone 850-231-5616
Facsimile 850-622-5618
[email protected]
TABLE OF COTETS
Record 1…….............................................................................................................i
E-Copy Received Sep 17, 2010 4:52 PM

Appellants Motion To Strike Bad Brief

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Appellants Motion To Strike Bad Brief

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Appellants Motion To Strike Bad Brief

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

IN THE FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

v. CASE NO.: 1D10-3850

ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT

APPELLAT'S MOTIO TO STRIKE APPELLEES WATERSOUD AD

John P. Carroll, Pro Se

1DCA bad brief:

1. On September 17, 2010 Appellee’s WaterSound Beach and Matteson filed

their Answer Brief (R 1). No other parties filed an Answer Brief.

2. The Appellees chose to include a Statement of the Case (R 1 at pages 1 –

4. Accordingly, Appellees triggered Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure

9.210 (b) (3).

5. Appellees attempted to mislead this Court about the details and

6. There is one record reference made by the Appellees, and it is contained

in an improperly submitted footnote (font size) wherein Appellees attempt to explain

level to schedule a hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (R 1 at page

District Court of Appeals Strike the Appellees Answer Brief.

v. CASE NO.: 1D10-3850

ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT

APPELLAT'S APPEDIX TO MOTIO TO STRIKE BAD BRIEF

John P. Carroll, Pro Se

You might also like

APPELLAT'S MOTIO TO STRIKE APPELLEES WATERSOUD AD

APPELLAT'S APPEDIX TO MOTIO TO STRIKE BAD BRIEF