Alternative Adhesive Materials
Alternative Adhesive Materials
Alternative Adhesive Materials
19 | P a g e
NOVATEUR PUBLICATIONS
International Journal Of Research Publications In Engineering And Technology [IJRPET]
ISSN: 2454-7875
VOLUME 2, ISSUE 6, June-2016
MATERIAL AND COST OPTIMIZATION:
According to the analysis and the results
obtained it is clear that the variant no. 6 , adhesive
material Araldite 71 with thickness 0.2mm is the best
alternative choice of the material . Thickness reduction
has been achieved from 0.5mm to 0.2mm that is 60%
saving in the adhesive material and ultimately the cost
of purchasing the material.
Amount of Araldite71 required per month = 1100 kg
Actual Cost of 1 kg Araldite71 = Rs 558 /-
Total cost of material required initially = 1100*558
= Rs 6,13,800 /-
Fig.6. Maximum shear stress contour foe variants 1 to 3 Cost after 60% reduction in material =Rs 223.2/-
Total cost of material required after optimization
=1100*223.2
= Rs 2,45,520 /-
Economical advantage obtained = Rs (613800 - 245520)
=Rs 3,68,280 /-
Hence due to study of the material properties
and its optimization, an economical advantage of Rs
3,68,280 /- is obtained per month.
CONCLUSION:
The variant with minimal amount of
adhesive applied over the Liner Base is the obvious
choice among the alternatives while also addressing the
compliance over the Maximum stress permissible.
Variant no.6, with material Araldite and thickness 0.2
Fig.7. Maximum shear stress contour foe variants 4 to 6 mm for the Adhesive layer offers to be the best
alternative for this application. The stress level observed
for this variant (5.207 MPa) complies safely with the set
RESULTS:
limit for the Adhesive material used (28MPa). Although
Following table shows the alternative
the range for the Shear Strength being 8MPa to 50MPa,
adhesive materials, their properties , thickness of
the Design is recommended considering the safest value
adhesive applied and maximum shear load sustained by
of the stress expected over the Brake Shoe (8MPa)
that material for the corresponding thickness.
Table 1. Responses determined for Adhesive layer for
VALIDTION:
different thickness
Validation of the obtained results can be
done using experimental methods. Experimentation can
be done using software based UTM machines and results
can be compared with those obtained from
computational methods. A standard fixture with ISO
15708 can be designed that can replicate the actual
working conditions and performance test can be done.
REFFERENCES:
[1] K.H. Bhusal, Prof. S.R. Nimbalkar, Prof. S. B. Belkar,
Swapnil Kulkarni, Performing Finite Element Analysis for
Adhesive joint for Brake shoe of an Automotive System
while evaluating its design.
20 | P a g e
NOVATEUR PUBLICATIONS
International Journal Of Research Publications In Engineering And Technology [IJRPET]
ISSN: 2454-7875
VOLUME 2, ISSUE 6, June-2016
[2] Lucas F.M. da Silva et.al. Lucas F.M. da Silva, N.M.A.J.
Ferreira , V.Richter- Trummer , E.A.S. Marques (2010)
“Effect of grooves on the strength of adhesively bonded
joints” International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives.
[3] Nunziante Valoroso and Silvio de Barros, Adhesive
joint computations using cohesive zones. Applied
Adhesion Science 2013.
[4] Neha B. Thakare, A.B. Dhumane, A Review on Design
and Analysis of Adhesive Bonded Joint by Finite Element
Analysis, SSRG International Journal of Mechanical
Engineering (SSRG-IJME) – volume 2 Issue 4–April 2015
[5] K.Deepika, C.Bhaskar Reddy, D.Ramana, Fabrication
and Performance Evaluation of a Composite Material for
Wear Resistance Application, IJESIT, Volume 2, Issue 6,
November 2013, ISSN: 2319-5967.
[6] Debora C Moreira and Luiz CS Nunes ,Experimental
analysis of bonded single lap joint with flexible adhesive,
Applied Adhesion Science 2014, Springer Open Journal.
21 | P a g e