Process
Process
Process
SECTION A
1. A Choose the correct answer from given four alternatives: [one mark each]
A. Which of the following is not a step in the analysis of process costing;
a. compute output in terms of equivalent units, summarize the total costs to be accounted for by cost
categories
b. compute the unit costs per equivalent unit
c. apply total costs to units completed
d. allocate overhead on the equivalent units
E. Process B had no opening inventory. 13,500 units of raw material were transferred in at Rs 4.50 per
unit. Additional material at Rs 1.25 per unit was added in process. Labour and overheads were Rs 6.25
per completed unit and Rs 2.50 per unit incomplete.
If 11,750 completed units were transferred out, what was the closing inventory in Process B?
a. Rs 6,562.50
b. Rs 12,250.00
c. Rs 14,437.50
d. Rs 25,375.00
H. In process costing, where losses have a positive scrap value, when an abnormal gain arises the
abnormal gain account is;
a. debited with the normal production cost of the abnormal gain units and debited with the scrap
value of the abnormal gain units
b. debited with the normal production cost of the abnormal gain units and credited with the scrap
value of the abnormal gain units
c. credited with the normal production cost of the abnormal gain units and debited with the scrap
value of the abnormal gain units
d. credited with the normal production cost of the abnormal gain units and credited with the scrap
value of the abnormal gain units
I.
The following information is available for SM Co for last month.
Conversion costs Rs105,280
Completed during the period 18,000 units
Closing work in progress 2,000 units (40% complete as to conversion costs)
The conversion cost per unit of production is;
a. Rs. 6.50
b. Rs. 5.60
c. Rs. 7.20
d. Rs. 5.90
J. A food manufacturing process has a normal wastage of 10% of input. In a period, 3,000 kg of
material were input and there was an abnormal loss of 75 kg. No inventories are held at the
beginning or end of the process.
What is the quantity of good production achieved?
a. 2625 Kg.
b. 2700 kg.
c. 2925 kg
d. None of the above
B. Match the following: [one mark each]
C. State whether the following statements are True' or 'False': [one mark each]
a. FIFO methods are followed for evaluation of equivalent production when prices are fluctuating.
b. Work in progress is the inherent feature of processing industries.
c. The process cost is derived by dividing the process cost by number of units produced in the process
during the period
d. Chemical works, soap making and Milk dairy production are examples of process costing.
e. Split-off point is a point beyond input factors are commonly used for production of multiple
products, which can be either joint products or by-products. After this point, the joint products or
by-products gain individual identity.
D. Fill in the blanks: [one mark each]
i. Process costing is appropriate for companies that produce a continuous mass of ________________________
through a series of _____________________________
ii. When there are no beginning ____________________ inventories, equivalent units produced are the same as
_________________
iii. In process costing, 100 units that are 60 percent completed are the equivalent of ________________
completed units in terms of conversion costs.
iv. There are two ways to treat the costs of the beginning inventory:___________________________ and
_____________________
v. ______________ are those that have a relatively significant sales value, while ______________ are those whose
sales value is relatively minor in comparison with the value of the main, or joint, products.
b) A product passes from Process-I and Process-II. Materials issued to Process-I amounted to Rs 80000,
Wages Rs 60,000 and manufacturing overheads were Rs 54,000. Normal loss anticipated was 5% of
input. 9100 units of out put were produced and transferred from Process-I. There were no opening
stocks. Input raw material issued to ProcessIwere10,000 units. Scrap has realisable value of Rs 4 per
unit.
You are required to show Process-I account, value of normal loss, abnormal loss and units transferred
to Process-II.
b) A chemical is manufactured in two processes, X and Y. Data for process Y for last month is as follows.
Material transferred from process X - 2,000 litres @ Rs 4 per litre
Conversion costs incurred Rs 12,250
Output transferred to finished goods 1,600 litres
Closing work in progress 100 litres
Normal loss is 10% of input. All losses are fully processed and have a scrap value of Rs 4 per litre.
Closing work in progress is fully complete for material, but is only 50 per cent processed.
Calculate the value of the completed output and the value of the closing work in progress.
b) Opening work-in-process 1,000 units (60% complete); Cost Rs 1,10,000. Units introduced during the
period 10,000 units; Cost Rs19,30,000. Transferred to next process-9,000 units.
Closing work-in-process- 800 units (75% complete), Normal loss is estimated at 10% of total input
including units in process at the beginning. Scraps realise Rs10 per unit. Scraps are 100% complete.
(b) Kajiul Ltd. furnished you the following information relating to process B for the month of October, 2017.
Opening work-in-progress- NIL
Units introduced - 10,000 units @ Rs3 per unit
Expenses debited to the process; Direct materials Rs14,650; Labour Rs21,148; Overheads Rs 42,000
Finished output - 9,500 units
Closing work-in-progress 350 units; Degree of completion: Material 100%; Labour and overheads 50%
Normal loss in process- One (01) per cent of input
Degree of completion of abnormal loss: Material 100%; Labour and Overheads 80%
Units scrapped as normal loss were sold at Re1 per unit
All the units of abnormal loss were sold at Rs2.50 per unit.
Prepare:
i. Statement of Equivalent Production
ii. Statement of Cost
iii. Process - B Account
6. (a) The following information is obtained in respect of process 3 of the month of August
Value of Opening Stock Direct Material ARs 390; Direct material B:Rs 75;
Direct Labour - Rs 112; Production overhead - Rs 118.
Process 2 transfer 6,000 units at Rs 2,360
Process 4 transfer 4,700 units.
Direct material added
Rs 520
in process
Direct labour employed Rs 1,036
Production Over Heads Rs 1,541
Units scrapped 300
Direct material 100%
Degree of completion Direct labour 80%
Production overhead 60%
Closing stock 2,000 units
Direct material 60%
Degree of completion:
Direct labour 50%
6 (b) Describe briefly, how joint costs upto the point of separation may be apportioned amongst the joint products
under the following methods:
(i) Average unit cost method
(ii) Contribution margin method
(iii) Market value at the point of separation
(iv) Market value after further processing
(v) Net realizable value method.
7. (a) Total Mining Company produces two products from ore, copper and zinc. The following events took place in
October 2017.
Particulars Copper Zinc Total
Units Produced 40000 60000 100000
Unit Selling Price Rs 2.00 Rs 2.00
Joint cost incurred were Rs 110000
i. Allocate joint cost amongst the two products using physical quantity method.
ii. Allocate joint cost amongst the two products using relative sales value method.
iii. Explain the difference in Unit costs using the two methods
iv. Which method do you think better allocates joint costs? Why?
(b) A chemical process yields 60% of the material introduced as main Product - A and 15% as By-Product
B, and 20% as By - Product - C and 5% being the wastage.
The ratio of absorption of Raw material and Labour in the process products is as follows:
(i) One unit of product C requires half the raw material required for one unit of product - B, one unit
of product - A requires 1 ½ time the raw material required for product - B.
(ii) Product A requires double the time needed for the production of one unit of B and one unit of C
(iii) Product C requires half the time required for the production of one unit of product B
(iv) Overheads are to be absorbed in the ratio of 6:1:1
(v) Cost Data: Input 1,000 units of cost Rs 4,600
Direct labour Rs 4,100
Overheads Rs6,000
[8+7 =15]
8. Answer both the questions
(a) Robinson Ltd. produces and sells the following products:
Raw material costs Rs 35,90,000 and other manufacturing expenses cost Rs 5,47,000 in the manufacturing
process which are absorbed on the products on the basis of their ‘Net realisable value’. The further
ANSWERS
1. A.
A B C D E F G H I J
d c d b c b* d** c b a
* CIMA terminology defines joint products as 'Two or more products produced by the same process and
separated in processing, each having a sufficiently high saleable value to merit recognition as a main product”
** CIMA terminology defines By products as “Output of some value produced incidentally whilemanufacturing
the main product”
1. B.
A B C D E F G H I J
f j a g b c d e h i
1. C
F, T, F, T,F
1. D.
i. Like units, operations or processes.
ii. Work in process, the current equivalent units.
iii. 60 units
iv. weighted average costing, first-in, first-out (FIFO)
v. Joint product, By product
Answer 2 (a)
Process I Account
Particulars Units (Rs) Particulars Units (Rs)
To Material 10,000 80,000 By Normal 500 2000
Loss (5%) [*]
To Wages - 60,000
To Overhead - 54,000 By Process II 9,500 192000
10000 194000 10000 194000
* Value of normal loss = 500 units ×Rs 4 = Rs 2000
** Value of units transferred to Process II =
𝑻𝒐𝒕𝒂𝒍 𝑪𝒐𝒔𝒕 𝒐𝒇 𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒅𝒖𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏−𝑵𝒐𝒓𝒎𝒂𝒍 𝑳𝒐𝒔𝒔 (𝑺𝒄𝒓𝒂𝒑 𝑽𝒂𝒍𝒖𝒆)
𝑻𝒐𝒕𝒂𝒍 𝑼𝒏𝒊𝒕𝒔 𝒊𝒏𝒕𝒓𝒐𝒅𝒖𝒄𝒆𝒅−𝑵𝒐𝒓𝒎𝒂𝒍 𝑳𝒐𝒔𝒔 (𝑼𝒏𝒊𝒕𝒔)
× 𝑼𝒏𝒊𝒕𝒔 𝑻𝒓𝒂𝒔𝒇𝒆𝒓𝒓𝒆𝒅
Answer 2 (b)
Process I Account
Particulars Units (Rs) Particulars Units (Rs)
To Material 10,000 80,000 By Normal 500 2000
loss (5%) [*]
To Wages - 60,000 By Abnormal Loss
(Qty.- Bal. Fig) 400 -
To Overhead - 54,000 By Process II 9,100 -
10,000 1,94,000 10,000 1,94,000
* Value of normal loss = 500 units ×Rs 4 = Rs 2000
Value of Abnormal loss =
𝑻𝒐𝒕𝒂𝒍 𝑪𝒐𝒔𝒕 𝒐𝒇 𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒅𝒖𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏−𝑵𝒐𝒓𝒎𝒂𝒍 𝑳𝒐𝒔𝒔 (𝑺𝒄𝒓𝒂𝒑 𝑽𝒂𝒍𝒖𝒆)
𝑻𝒐𝒕𝒂𝒍 𝑼𝒏𝒊𝒕𝒔 𝒊𝒏𝒕𝒓𝒐𝒅𝒖𝒄𝒆𝒅−𝑵𝒐𝒓𝒎𝒂𝒍 𝑳𝒐𝒔𝒔 (𝑼𝒏𝒊𝒕𝒔)
× 𝒂𝒃𝒏𝒐𝒓𝒎𝒂𝒍 𝒍𝒐𝒔𝒔 𝒖𝒏𝒊𝒕𝒔
194000 − 2000
= × 400 = 8084
10000−500
194000 − 2000
10000−500
× 9100 = 183916
Answer 2 (c)
Cost per unit in closing inventory = Rs(4.50 + 1.25 + 2.50) = Rs8.25
Number of units in closing inventory = 13,500 – 11,750 = 1,750 units
Value of closing inventory = 1,750 units ×Rs8.25 = Rs14,437.50
The work in progress should bevalued at therate per incomplete unit in respect of labour and overheads.
Answer 3 (a)
Process Account
Particulars Units (Rs) Particulars Units (Rs)
To Material 10,000 5,000 By Normal Loss (5%) 1000 200
By Abnormal Loss
To Wages - 1,000 600
(Qty.- Bal. fig)
To Overhead (200%
of Labour) - 2,000 By Process II 8,400
10,000 8,000 10,000 8,000
Answer 3(b)
Cost per
Cost Equivalent
Particulars Equivalent
(Rs) Units
Units (Rs)
Cost of Material [Input from Process X] 7200 1800 4
Conversion Cost 12250 1750 7
11
Cost of Completed Production [1600 liters × 11] Rs 17600
No of Cost per
Cost Element Equivalent Equivalent Total
Units Units
Material 100 4 400
Conversion Cost 50 7 350
Value of Work in Progress Rs750
Answer 4 (a)
Process I Account
Particulars Units (Rs) Particulars Units (Rs)
To Raw material
used (Rs60 × 7,500 By Normal loss
units) 7,500 4,50,000 (5%) × 12.50 375 4,688
To Direct wages -- 1,35,750 By Process- II A/c 7,050 6,82,403
By Abnormal loss 75 7,259
To Direct expenses -- 81,450
To Manufacturing
Overhead 27,150
7,500 6,94,350 7,500 6,94,350
Cost per Unit of transfer and Abnormal Loss = (694350 - 4688) ÷ (7500 - 375) =96.795
Process II Account
Particulars Units (Rs) Particulars Units (Rs)
Answer 4(b)
Answer 5 (b)
Statement of Cost
Particulars Cost Equivalent Cost per unit
(Rs) units (Rs)
Material
(30000+14650)- 44,550 9,900 4.5000
100
Labour 21,148 9,715 2.1768
Overhead 42,000 9,715 4.3232
Process Account
Particulars Units Rs Particulars Units Rs
To, Material 10000 30000 By, Normal Loss A/c 100 100
Introduced 14650 By, Abnormal Loss A/c 50 485
To, Material A/c 21148 By, Closing Stock A/c 350 2,713
To, Labour A/c 42000 By, Transfer to Next Process
To, Overheads A/c @ Rs 11 per unit 9500 1,04,500
Answer 6 (a)
Process 2 Account
Particulars Units (Rs) Particulars Units (Rs)
To Opening WIP 1,000 695 By Normal 250 50
To Transfer from Process 2 6000 2360 By Abnormal Loss 50 42
- 520
To Material By Closing WIP 2,000 1360
To Labour By Process 4 [4700 ×
- 1,036 (0.40+0.10+0.20+0.30)] 4,700 4,700
To Overhead 1,541
7,000 6,152 7,000 6,152
Answer 6 (b)
Physical Unit method: This method is based on the assumption that the joint products are capable of
being measured in the same units. Accordingly, joint costs here are apportioned on the basis of some
physical base, such as weight, numbers etc. In other words, the basis used for apportioning joint cost over
the joint products is the physical volume o material present in the joint products at the point of separation.
Net Realisable Value at Split- off Point Method: In this method of joint cost apportionment the
followings are deducted from the sales value of joint products at final stage i.e. after processing: Estimated
profit margins, Selling and distribution expenses, if any, and Post split-off costs.
The resultant figure so obtained is known as net realisable value of joint products. Joint costs are
apportioned in the ratio of net realisable value.
This method uses technical estimates to apportion the joint costs over the joint products. This method is
used when the result obtained by the above methods does not match with the resources consumed by joint
products or the realisable values of the joint products are not readily available.
Other Methods
The followings are the methods which are used by management for taking managerial decisions:
Market value at the point of separation: This method is used for the apportionment of joint costs to joint
products up to the split off point. It is difficult to apply this method if the market value of the products at
the point of separation is not available. It is a useful method where further processing costs are incurred
disproportionately.
To determine the apportionment of joint costs over joint products, a factor known as multiplying factor is
determined. This multiplying factor on multiplication with the sales values of each joint product gives rise
to the proportion of joint cost.
iii. Both the physical measures method and the relative sales value method are acceptable ways to allocate joint
costs. Under the physical measures method, joint costs are allocated based on the relative number of units
produced. The product with the most units will be allocated the most costs. Under the relative sales value
method, joint costs are allocated based on the relative sales value of the units produced. Since copper has a higher
relative sales value, it will be allocated more of the joint costs under the relative sales value method even though
fewer units are produced.
iv. The major advantage of the relative sales value method is that it allocates joint costs according to the relative
revenue-generating ability of the individual products. This can avoid wide swings in gross margin percentages of
the two products.
Answer 8 (a)
a) Statement showing in come forecast of the company assuming that none of its products are further
processed
Products A(Rs) B(Rs) C(Rs) D(Rs) E(Rs) Total(Rs)
Sales revenue 34,00,000 3,90,000 2,00,000 2,00,000 10,50,000 52,40,000
(Rs17×2,00,000) (Rs13×30,000) (Rs8×25,000) (Rs10×20,000) (Rs14×75,000)
Less: 26,25,000 2,52,000 1,75,000 1,40,000 9,45,000 41,37,000
Apportioned 7,75,000 1,38,000 25,000 60,000 1,05,000 11,03,000
Costs
Less: Fixed Cost 4,73,000
Profit 6,30,000
b) Statement showing income forecast of the company: assuming that products A, B, C and E are further
processed (Refer to working note)
Products A(Rs) B(Rs) C (Rs) D(Rs) E (Rs) Total (Rs)
A. Sales revenue 50,00,000 5,10,000 3,00,000 2,00,000 15,00,000 75,10,000
B. Apportioned Costs 26,25,000 2,52,000 1,75,000 1,40,000 9,45,000 41,37,000
C. Further processing cost 12,50,000 1,50,000 50,000 - 1,50,000 16,00,000
D. Total processing cost (B+ C) 38,75,000 4,02,000 2,25,000 1,40,000 10,95,000 57,37,000
E. Excess of sales revenue (A-D) 11,25,000 1,08,000 75,000 60,000 4,05,000 17,73,000
F. Fixed Cost 4,73,000
G. Profit (E - F) 13,00,000
Answer 8 (b) By-Products are defined as “products recovered from material discarded in a main process, or
from the production of some major products, where the material value is to be considered at the time of
severance from the main product.” Thus by- products emerge as a result of processing operation of another
product or they are produced from the scrap or waste of materials of a process. In short a by-product is a
secondary or subsidiary product which emanates as a result of manufacture of the main product.
The point at which they are separated from the main product or products is known as split-off point. The
expenses of processing are joint till the split –off point.