Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 93 views

    Solow Vs Harrod-Domar

    Uploaded by

    Ayat Salim
    The document compares the Harrod-Domar and Solow models of economic growth. The Harrod-Domar model views capital formation and saving as the drivers of long-term growth, while the Solow model argues that technological advancement, not capital alone, drives growth over time due to diminishing returns. While the Solow model better explains US postwar growth, focusing on technology, neither model accurately portrays growth in poor countries due to differences in initial conditions, government effectiveness, and lack of historical data from those nations.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Solow Vs Harrod-Domar

    Uploaded by

    Ayat Salim
    93 views2 pages
    The document compares the Harrod-Domar and Solow models of economic growth. The Harrod-Domar model views capital formation and saving as the drivers of long-term growth, while the Solow model argues that technological advancement, not capital alone, drives growth over time due to diminishing returns. While the Solow model better explains US postwar growth, focusing on technology, neither model accurately portrays growth in poor countries due to differences in initial conditions, government effectiveness, and lack of historical data from those nations.

    Original Title

    Solow_Vs_Harrod-Domar.docx

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document compares the Harrod-Domar and Solow models of economic growth. The Harrod-Domar model views capital formation and saving as the drivers of long-term growth, while the Solow model argues that technological advancement, not capital alone, drives growth over time due to diminishing returns. While the Solow model better explains US postwar growth, focusing on technology, neither model accurately portrays growth in poor countries due to differences in initial conditions, government effectiveness, and lack of historical data from those nations.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    93 views2 pages

    Solow Vs Harrod-Domar

    Uploaded by

    Ayat Salim
    The document compares the Harrod-Domar and Solow models of economic growth. The Harrod-Domar model views capital formation and saving as the drivers of long-term growth, while the Solow model argues that technological advancement, not capital alone, drives growth over time due to diminishing returns. While the Solow model better explains US postwar growth, focusing on technology, neither model accurately portrays growth in poor countries due to differences in initial conditions, government effectiveness, and lack of historical data from those nations.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    Villanueva, Josef S.

    Ec 121 F
    Mr. Sescon
    20 November 2012
    Paper 1: Harrod-Domar Model vs Solow Model

    The main difference between the Harrod-Domar Model and the Solow Model is that each of

    the models regard different factors as the driver of long-term growth. It can be said that the Harrod-

    Domar Model is Keynesian and the Solow Model is Neoclassical. However, to be more precise, the

    Harrod-Domar Model puts capital formation and saving as the forefront of economic growth and that

    the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of a country is directly proportional to the growth of investments.

    Meanwhile, the Solow Model refutes that long term growth cannot be achieved through capital

    growth alone since diminishing marginal utility must be taken into account. In the Solow Model, labor

    is constant such that an increase in capital would readily increase the capital output per worker and too

    much increase in capital will actually diminish productivity because the workers would have to use

    multiple machines at the same time, if we were to consider the capital input to be machinery. The same

    can be said about saving because saving resources in the current period to invest in capital on the next

    period will never drive economic growth in the long run. Instead of capital and saving, the Solow

    suggests that technological advancement is the ultimate driver for long term economic growth. Seeing

    from the growth pattern of the US in the post-war era, technology seems to have a great impact on the

    growth of the US economy.

    In terms of the believability, the Solow Model offers more reality in its assumptions as seen by

    the comparison of Easterly of the said model to the Harrod-Domar Model. From the writing of Easterly,

    the practical example of Ghana as a country who has been receiving a lot of foreign aid and investment

    has never taken off from its initial state some sixty years ago. Historically, only very few countries have

    become consistent with the Harrod-Domar Model’s predictions and such quantity is an exception rather

    than a norm.

    On the other hand, the Solow Model whose principal subject is to explain the growth of the US,

    has succeeded because it has shown that beyond the limits of capital-driven growth is economic
    development put forth by technological progress. However, it is worth noting that the Solow Model is

    only meant to represent the US economy and not the third world countries. However, many economists

    have adapted the Solow Model to the growth of poor countries as well and it seemed that neither the

    Solow Model nor the Harrod-Domar Model were accurate insofar as the economic growth of poor

    countries is concerned.

    Perhaps the inaccuracy of the two model lies in the fact that the two models were not calibrated

    for the conditions in the poor countries. Take for instance the parameters of the Solow Model. Of course,

    the initial conditions of the western countries to that of the poor countries are entirely different. Perhaps

    one of the bigger factors why the two models are not so successful with the tropical countries is that the

    governments of the western countries are more mature than that of the third world countries and the

    former had better and more efficient ways of making things work. Moreover, it cannot be helped that

    the models used for economic growth for the poorer countries come from the richer countries mainly

    because economists have very little historical data on the poor countries to work on so no model can be

    patterned after poor counties’ performance. Meanwhile, richer countries can afford to hire economic

    historians to get historical data for their economic models.

    You might also like