Physicians' Handbook On Death and Birth Registration
Physicians' Handbook On Death and Birth Registration
Physicians' Handbook On Death and Birth Registration
https://books.google.com
FOE TKSX-POCKET OR VISITIHG
DEPAHTMENT OF COMMEHI
BUREAU OF THE CENSUS
6AM. L HOGEHS
PHYSICIANS'
POCKET REFEREN
TO THE
INTERNATIONAL LIST
OF CAUSES OF DEATH
THIHD EDITION
FOE THE - OE VISITING LIST
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
BUREAU OF THE CENSUS
SAM. L. HOGEHS, DIRECTOR
PHYSICIANS'
POCKET REFERENCE
TO THE
INTERNATIONAL LIST
OF CAUSES OF DEATH*
THIRD EDITION
WASHINGTON
GOVEENMENT PEINTING OFFICE
1916
/7/4
LETTEE OF TEANSMITTAL.
DEPAETMENT OF COMMEECE,
BUEEAU OF CENSUS,
Wa1h1n&on, D. C,, May 2, IQI.
SIR:
The first edition of this booklet, a copy of which was sent to
every physician in the United States in January, 1911, has been of
great service in improving the quality of the returns of causes of
death, and has further aided in showing the importance of vital
statistics, of adequate legislation for this purpose, and of the thor
ough enforcement of existing laws. Besides its primary distribu
tion, many thousands of copies have been sent out by state and city
registration officials, and also by the bureau directly, to individual
physicians in connection with the work of obtaining more definite
statements of causes of death for the transcripts received from the
registration area.
In 1914 a second edition was issued in which the " List of Unde
sirable Terms" was somewhat amplified
This, the third edition, shows the rapidly growing extent of the
registration area for deaths, and calls attention to the increasing
interest in the subject, especially in the South, as well as to the
great need for more effective enforcement of laws for the registra
tion of births throughout the country.
The first and second editions were prepared under the direction
of Dr. Cressy L. Wilbur, former chief statistician for vital statistics,
and the present edition was prepared by Mr. Richard C. Lappin,
the present chief statistician for vital statistics of this bureau,
assisted by Mr. George H. Van Buren, expert chief of division.
Very truly yours,
(I.GENEEAL DISEASES.)
1. Typhoid fever.
2. Typhus fever.
3. Eelapsing fever. [Insert "(spirillum)."]
4. Malaria.
5. Smallpox.
6. Measles.
7. Scarlet fever.
8. Whooping cough.
9- Diphtheria and croup-
rtmuenza.
CAUSES OF DEATH. 5
ii. Miliary fever. [True Febris miliaria only.]
ii. Asiatic cholera.
13. Cholera nostras.
14. Dysentery. [Amebic? Bacillary ? Do not report ordinary
diarrhea and enteritis (104, 105) as dysentery.]
15. Plague.
16. Yellow fever.
17.
18. Leprosy.
Erysipelas. [State also cause ; see Class XIII.]
19. Other epidemic diseases ;
Mumps ,
German measles,
Chicken-pox,
Rocky Mountain spotted (tick) fever,
Glandular
20. Purulent fever,and
infection etc.septicemia. [State also cause; see
Classes VII and XIII especially.]
21. Glanders.
22. Anthrax.
23. Rabies. [State also cause; see Class XIII.]
24. Tetanus.
25. Mycoses. [Specify, as Actinomycosis of lung, etc.]
26. Pellagra.
27.
28. Beriberi.
Tuberculosis of the lungs.
29. Acute miliary tuberculosis.
30. Tuberculous meningitis.
31. Pott's
32. Abdominal tuberculosis.
disease. [Preferably Tuberculosis of spine.]
33. White swellings. [Preferably Tuberculosis 01 joint]
34. Tuberculosis of other organs. [Specify organ.]
35. Disseminated tuberculosis. [Specify organs affected.]
36. Rickets.
37. Syphilis.
38. Gonococcus infection.
39. Cancer1 of the buccal cavity. [State part.]
40. Cancer1 of the stomach, liver.
41. Cancer1 of the peritoneum, intestines, rectum.
42. Cancer1 of thefemale genital organs. [State organ.]
43. Cancer1 of the breast.
44. Cancer1
45. Cancer1 of of other
the shin. [State part.]
or unspecified organs. [State organ.]
46. Other tumors (tumors of thefemale genital organs excepted.)
[Name kind of tumor and
47. Acute articular rheumatism. [Always organ affected.
state Malignant?]
M rheumatism "
as acute or chronic]
48. Chronic rheumatism [preferably Arthritis deformans] and
gout.
49.
50. Scurvy.
Diabetes. [Diabetes mellitus.]
5x. Exophthalmic goiter.
52. Addison's disease.
53. Leukemia.chlorosis. [State form or cause. Pernicious ?]
54. Anemia,
55. Other general diseases:)
Diabetes insipidus,
Purpura haemorrhaglca, etc.
56. Alcoholism (acute or chronic).
I " Cancer and other malignant tumors." Preferably reported as
Carcinoma of , Sarcoma of , Epithelioma of , etc
stating the exact nature of the neoplasm and the organ or part 01
the body first affected.
INTERNATIONAL LIST.
57. Chronic lead poisoning. [State cause. Occupational?]
58. Other chronic occupation poisonings. [State exact name o
poison, whether the poisoning was chronic and due to oc
cupation, and also please be particularly careful to see that
the Special Occupation and Industry are fully stated. I
the occupation stated on the certifcate is not that in which
the poisoning occurred- add the latter in connection with the
statement of cause of death, e. g., "Chronic occupational
phosphorus necrosis (dipper, match factory, white phos
phorus)." Give full details- including pathologic conditions
contributory to death. Following is a List of Industrial
Poisons (Bull. Bureau of Labor, May, 1912) to which the
attention of physicians practicing in industrial communities
should be especially directed:
Acetaldehyde, Formaldehyde,
Acridine, Hydrochloric acid.
Acrolein, Hydrofluoric acid,
Ammonia, Lead (57),
Ainyl acetate, Manganese dioxide.
Amyl alcohol, Mercury,
Aniline, Methyl alcohol,
Aniline dyestuffs [name] , Methyl bromide,
Antimony compounds Nltraniline,
[name] , Nitrobenzol,
Arsenic compounds [name], Nitroglycerin.
Arsenlureted hydrogen. Nitronaphthalene,
Benzine, Nitrous gases,
Benzol, Oxalic acid,
Carbon dioxide, Petroleum,
Carbon dlsulphlde, Phenol,
Carbon monoxide (coal va Phenylhydrazlne,
por, illuminating water Phosgene,
gas, producer gas), Phosphorus (yellow or
Chloride of lime, white),
Chlorine, Phosphorus sesquisulphide,
Chlorodinitrobenzol, Phospbureted hydrogen,
Chloronitrobenzol, Picric acid,
Chromium compounds Pyridine,
[name] , Sulphur chloride.
Cyanogen compounds Sulphur dioxide,
[name], Sulphureted hydrogen,
DIazomethane, Sulphuric acid,
Dimethyl sulphate, Tar,
Dinitrobenzol, Turpentine oil.
Not all substances in the preceding list are likely to be reported
as causes of death, but the physician should be familiar with it in
order to recognize, and to report, if required, cases of illness, and
should also be on the alert to discover new forms of industrial poi
soning not heretofore recognized. In the Bulletin cited full details
may be found as to the branches of industry in which the poisoning
occurs, mode of entrance into the body, and the symptoms of poi
soning. Attention should also be called to industrial infection,
e. g.. Anthrax (22), and the influence of gases and vapors, dust,
or unhygienic industrial environment].
59. Other chronic poisonings :
Chronic morphinism.
Chronic cocainlsm, eto.
CAUSES OF DEATH. 7
UNDESIEABLE TEEM.
^It is understood that the
term criticised is in the REASON WHY UNDESIEABLE, AND
exact form given be SUGGESTION FOE MOEE DEFINITE
low, without further STATEMENT OF CAUSE OF DEATH.
explanation or Quali
fication, )
' Disease," " Trouble," Name the disease, e. g., Lobar pneu
or '' Complaint" of monia, Tuberculosis of lungs,
[any organ] e. g., Chronic interstitial nephritis, Syphi
" Lu n g trouble," litic gumrnui of brain, etc.
'' Kidney complaint"
" Diseuse of brain/'
etc.
' Meningitis," " Cere Only two terms should ever be used
bral meningitis," report deaths from Cerebrospir
" Cerebrospinal men- (ever, synonvm, Epidemic cerebi
ingit is ," " S'p i n al Spinal meningitis, and they sho,
meningitis " be written as above and in no oil
way It matters not in the use of t
latter term whether the disease
actually epidemic or not in the loc
ity. A single sporadic case sho1
be so reported. The first term (Cei
brosplnal fever) is preferable 1
cause there is no apparent objecti
to its use for any number of cas
No one can intelligently classify su
returns as are given in the marg
Mere terminal or symptomatic 1n*
ingitis should not be entered at all
a cause of death; name the diset
in which it occurred Tubrculo
meningitis should be reported
such
ftj ? Longevity."
w
26 IMPERFECT BIRTH REGISTRATION.
pulsorily, less than three days in rural districts); (a) Standard cer
tificates (copies on request); (3) Compulsory burial or removal
permits for deaths, and some effective check on the accuracy of
registration for births (by deaths of infants under 1 year, special
enumeration, newspapers); (4) Efficient local registrars, properly
compensated (twenty-five cents) for each certificate registered and
returned in compliance with law only, and so distributed that the
least possible inconvenience will be caused physicians and under
takers in filing certificates; (5) Sole responsibility for registering
deaths and obtaining burial or removal permit In advance of in
terment upon undertaker or person disposing of body and sole
responsibility for registering births, within the time limit set by
law, upon the attending physician or midwife (parent in absence
of such attendance); (6) An efficient State Registrar, with full
power and responsibility to enforce the law, in direct connection
with the local registrars (any county official intervening in any ca
pacity between the State Registrar and local registrars means
failure of the law); (7) Prompt monthly returns of the original
certificates from the local registrars to the State Registrar, with
report of "No births'' or "No deaths1' when such was the case
and official statement of completeness of registration or report of
delinquents; (8) All this is useless to secure complete legal records
and statistics of tbe highest practical value unless penalties are pro
vided in the law, and those PENALTIES ARE ENFORCED.
Imperfect Enforcement of Birth Registration Laws.
No state in the Union can claim at the present time complete
registration of all births that occur. Even in the oldest registration
states (e. g., Massachusetts, Connecticut) some births are not
recorded. Considering the short time that it has been in operation
in any state, the Model Law has afforded better results than any
other birth registration law in this country. This is well shown
by the results in Pennsylvania, Ohio, Missouri, and Kentucky.
As shown in Census Bulletin 112, Mortality Statistics, zoix, only a
few states registered as many births in 1910 as there were infants
under 1 year of age in the population. The births should consid
erably exceed the infants under 1 year of age owing to the number
born and dying during the census year. Only eleven states ex
ceeded this low limit, namely, Connecticut, Indiana, Maine, Mas
sachusetts, Michigan, New Hampshire, New York, Ohio, Penn
sylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont; and of these only three
(Connecticut, Massachusetts, Rhode Island), exclusive of cities of
500,000 population and over, showed for the following year (1911)
births exceeding infants under 1 year of age by as much as 10 per
cent. Rates of infantile mortality are worthless in almost all the
states on account of the imperfect registration of births. But
Kentucky and Missouri each afforded, for the first calendar year
of the operation of the Model Law (1911), returns of births nearly
IMPERFECT BIRTH REGISTRATION. 27
equal to the number of infants in the population, and for the fol
lowing year (1912) slightly in excess. The support of the pro
fession, press, and people must be obtained in order to insure
effective registration of births, but with this once gained, the
thorough continuous enforcement of the Model Law will yield
as excellent results for births as for deaths.
The necessity of birth registration for the saving of the lives of
infants and children is well shown in the first publication of the
Children's Bureau,! Department of Labor:
"The Children's Bureau devotes this, its first monograph, to
birth registration, because the adequate recording of births is
fundamentally necessary to the studies of child welfare which the
bureau is directed by law to undertake, and, more important, be
cause universal birth registration will prove of great practical
value to the people of the United States.
'''''
" Convinced that the most effective work in behalf of public
health that can be done in this country to-day lies in the prevention
of infant mortality, the Children's Bureau is brought to the
necessity of appealing for such legislation and such local records
as will indicate where and when the babies are born and where
and when they die, as a preliminary to an intelligent study of
the subject."
Will the physicians of the United States respond to this appeal?
What is needed is, first, enactment of adequate laws where
they do not now exist, and then, practically everywhere in the
United States, MORE THOROUGH ENFORCEMENT OF
BIRTH REGISTRATION LAWS. In many localities the
physicians are far more delinquent than the midwives with respect
to the reporting of births. The worthlessness of a large number
of our birth registration laws depends upon the noaenforcement
of the penalties of the laws by those officials who are charged
with their enforcement, largely from unwillingness to antagonize
prominent members of the medical profession who occasionally,
or regularly, disregard their duties relative to the registration of
births. The profession should encourage the effective adminis
tration of such laws by cheerfully and promptly complying with
them, and by supporting the efforts of health officers and other
registration officials in the performance of their plain duty. Have
you failed, Doctor, to record any birth that has occurred in
your practice? Your neglect may mean loss of money, lack of
proof of legitimacy, difficulty in proof of age for the requirements
of school and labor laws, and may perhaps work an irreparable
wrong to the child in future years. If so, please complete your
service to the family by registering the birth. DO IT NOW I
1 Monograph No. 1Birth Registration.
20 BIETH EEGISTRATION AREA.
In 1915 a registration area for the annual collection of birtfc
statistics was established by the Bureau of the Census, comprising
the states of Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts
Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, Pennsylvania, Michigan,
and Minnesota, and the District of Columbia, with an estimate;
population of 31,150,803, or 31 per cent, of the total estimated
population of the United States. The statistics will cover the
calendar year 1915 and they will be published late in 1916.