Clerk Heathcoat Obstructs Filing of Notice of Appeal, 08/03/2010

8/4/2010 Electronic Case Filing | U.S.
District Co…
U.S. District Court
Middle District of Florida (Ft. Myers)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:07-cv-00228-JES-SPC
Busse v. Lee County, Florida et al Date Filed: 04/10/2007

Assigned to: Judge John E. Steele Date Terminated: 05/06/2008
Referred to: Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell Jury Demand: Plaintiff
Case in other court: 08-13170B Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
09-12372-B Jurisdiction: Federal Question
09-13517F
09-13519F
09-13522F
09-14281F
09-14282F
09-14284F
09-14285F
09-16211F
09-16212F
09-16213F
09-16214F
09-16335F
10-10963-I
10-10967-I
10-11884-I
Cause: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff
Jorg Busse represented by Jorg Busse
P.O. Box 1126
Naples, Fl 34106-1126
239/595-7074
PRO SE
Plaintiff
Kenneth M. Roesch, Jr. represented by Kelly Lina Rooth
TERMINATED: 09/21/2007 Rooth Law Group, PA
Suite 322
4399 35th St N
St Petersbsurg, FL 33714
727/824-6212
Fax: 727/822-8048
Email: [email protected]
ecf.flmd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.p… 1/5
8/4/2010 Electronic Case Filing | U.S. District Co…
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Plaintiff
Anita M. Roesch represented by Kelly Lina Rooth
TERMINATED: 09/21/2007 (See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
Plaintiff
Troy Parnell represented by William Alfred Keyes , Jr.
TERMINATED: 09/21/2007 Stewart & Keyes, PL
2125 First St - Ste 101
PO Drawer 790
Ft Myers, FL 33902
239/334-7477
Fax: 239/334-7941
LEAD ATTORNEY
V.
Defendant
Lee County, Florida represented by Jack Neil Peterson
Lee County Attorney's Office
2115 Second St
PO Box 398
Ft Myers, FL 33902
239/533-2236
Fax: 239/485-2118
LEAD ATTORNEY
Defendant
Board of Lee County Commissioners represented by Jack Neil Peterson
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
Defendant
The Lee County Property Appraiser represented by Jack Neil Peterson
LEAD ATTORNEY
Sherri L. Johnson
Dent & Johnson, Chartered
3415 Magic Oak Lane
Sarasota, FL 34232
941/952-1070
LEAD ATTORNEY
Defendant
State of Florida, Board of Trustees of represented by Harold George Vielhauer
the Internal Improvement Trust Fund Florida Department of Environmental
past & present Protection
MS 35
3900 Commonwealth Blvd
Tallahassee, FL 32399-3000
850/245-2242
Fax: 850/245-2296
LEAD ATTORNEY
Linda Kathryn Funchess

Florida Department of Environmental
Protection
MS 35
850/245-2242
Fax: 850/245-2296
LEAD ATTORNEY
Reagan Kathleen Russell

Florida Department of Environmental
Protection*
MS 35
LEAD ATTORNEY
Defendant
Kenneth M. Wilkinson represented by Jack Neil Peterson
LEAD ATTORNEY
Sherri L. Johnson
LEAD ATTORNEY
Defendant
Lee County Attorney represented by Jack Neil Peterson
LEAD ATTORNEY
Defendant
State of Florida Department of represented by Harold George Vielhauer
Environmental Protection, and Division (See above for address)
of Recreation and Parks LEAD ATTORNEY
Linda Kathryn Funchess

LEAD ATTORNEY
Reagan Kathleen Russell

Defendant
Jack N. Peterson
Date Filed # Docket Text

05/21/2010 432 MOTION for order of sale and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by The Lee
County Property Appraiser, Kenneth M. Wilkinson. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2
Exhibit B, # 3 Text of Proposed Order Exhibit C)(Peterson, Jack) (Entered:
05/21/2010)
05/25/2010 433 ORDER of USCA dimissing this appeal for want of prosecution as to 431 Notice of
appeal filed by Jorg Busse. EOD: 05/21/2010; USCA number: 10-11884I. (kma)
(Entered: 05/25/2010)
07/21/2010 435 ORDER of USCA (certified copy) DISMISSING AS FRIVOLOUS as to 428 Notice
of appeal filed by Jorg Busse, 427 Notice of appeal filed by Jorg Busse. EOD: 7/19/10;
USCA number: 10-10963-I & 10-10967-I. (slp) (Entered: 07/23/2010)
07/22/2010 434 ORDER that plaintiff may file ONE response to defendant's 432 Motion for entry of
Order directing public sale of real property within 14 days of this Order. Signed by
Judge John E. Steele on 7/22/2010. (RKR) (Entered: 07/22/2010)
PACER Service Center

Transaction Receipt
08/04/2010 13:27:39
PACER Client
we0083
Login: Code:
Docket Search 2:07-cv-00228-JES-SPC Starting
Description:
Report Criteria: with document: 432
Billable
3 Cost: 0.24
Pages:
Case 2:07-cv-00228-JES-SPC Document 365 Filed 06/15/09 Page 15 of 16
8/4/2010 $5,048.60 EXTORTION SCAM, DEF. CL…
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]
Subject: $5,048.60 EXTORTION SCAM, DEF. CLERK DREW HEATHCOAT, DOC. # 425
Date: Wed, Aug 4, 2010 1:14 pm
Federal Bureau of Investigation
http://www.scribd.com/doc/35361666/Drew-Heathcoat-Extortion-Scam
USA, Ex Rel. et al. v. USA et al.

Civil RICO
Administrative Office of the United States Courts

One Columbus Circle, NE
Washington, D.C. 20544
Defendant Crooked Clerk of Court Drew Heathcoat

U.S. District Court
Fort Myers, FL 33901
mail.aol.com/…/PrintMessage.aspx 1/2
8/4/2010 $5,048.60 EXTORTION SCAM, DEF. CL…
RE:
DREW HEATHCOAT EXTORTION SCAM, FALSIFIED “$5,048.60 writ”,
DOC. ## 425; 365; 386-4; CASE NO. 2:2007-cv-00228
Dear Sirs:
The final money judgment issued as mandate 06/11/2009 was in the amount of $24.30, Doc. #
365.
Defendant K. M. Wilkinson bought Drew Heathcoat for the criminal and illegal purposes of
falsifying a “writ of execution”, Doc. # 425.
Def. Heathcoat knew and concealed that the fictitious “July 29, 2009, judgment” had never
existed, and that on 06/11/2009, the 11th Circuit had lost jurisdiction.
The “Bill of Costs” form, Doc. # 386-4, Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228 was blank.
Published at www.scribd.com.
/s/Jennifer Franklin, Private Attorney General

/s/Jorg Busse, M.D., M.B.A., M.M., Private Attorney General
USA, Ex Rel. et al. v. USA et al.

Civil RICO
Defendant Crooked Clerk of Court Drew Heathcoat

U.S. District Court
RE: DREW HEATHCOAT EXTORTION SCAM, FALSIFIED “$5,048.60 writ”,

DOC. ## 425; 365; 386-4; CASE NO. 2:2007-cv-00228
Dear Sirs:
The final money judgment issued as mandate 06/11/2009 was in the amount of $24.30, Doc. #
365.
Defendant K. M. Wilkinson bought Drew Heathcoat for the criminal and illegal purposes of
falsifying a “writ of execution”, Doc. # 425.
Def. Heathcoat knew and concealed that the fictitious “July 29, 2009, judgment” had never
existed, and that on 06/11/2009, the 11th Circuit had lost jurisdiction.

8/3/2010 EXTORTION OF $5,048.60, DOC. # 42…
To: [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]
Bcc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: EXTORTION OF $5,048.60, DOC. # 425; Def. Drew Heathcoat
Date: Tue, Aug 3, 2010 9:49 pm
Defendant Drew Heathcoat, Crooked Clerk of Court

U.S. District Court
RE: EXTORTION OF $5,048.60, DOC. # 425; Def. Drew Heathcoat
The final money judgment issued as mandate 06/11/2009 was in the amount of $24.30, Doc. # 365.

8/4/2010 You should know this
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: You should know this
Date: Wed, Aug 4, 2010 9:43 am
I wanted you to know, Dr. Busse, that my heart is with you...and Jennifer Prescott, as
with all of the others, who have had their property rights severely violated. It is a very
sad situation, as I don't believe that any one person has any more rights than the
next, as we are all "equal", especially when it comes to a piece of property that you
have worked so hard for and paid for honestly and is taken away from you by
someone else, who did nothing but covet. Perhaps the constitutionality of the law
should seriously be questioned, especially when there is tyranny involved. I hope,
that I get the opportunity and pleasure of meeting both you and Jennifer one of these
days. :-) I admire you for speaking up and addressing this issue. Sincerely, Angela
Case 2:07-cv-00228-JES-SPC Document 432-2 Filed 05/21/10 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FORT MYERS DIVISION
DR. JORG BUSSE,

Plaintiff [-Appellant],
KENNETH M. ROESCH, J.R., et al.,

Plaintiffs,
versus Case # 2:2007-cv-228-FtM-JES-SPC
LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA, et al.,

Defendants.
AFFIDAVIT
NOTICE OF APPEAL, RACKETEERING,
AND ORGANIZED GOVERNMENT CRIMES
__________________________________________________________________________/
NOTICE OF APPEAL FROM FRAUDULENT “order(s)”, DOC. ## 434, 435, 424, AND
RACKETEERING, EXTORTION, RETALIATION, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, AND
ANY AND ALL NULL & VOID “orders” BY DEF. J. E. STEELE & S. P. CHAPPELL,
AND FALSIFIED “writ of execution”, DOC. ## 425, 424, 434, 435, 433, 430; AFFIDAVIT
EMERGENCY MOTION TO ENJOIN FRAUD ON COURT, DOC. ## 435, 434, 424, 425
EMERGENCY MOTION TO ENJOIN “sale of real property”

WHICH GOVERNMENT HAD FRAUDULENTLY “claimed” TO “own”
UNDER COLOR OF FORGED “land parcel” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0”, AND
FACIALLY FORGED “O.R. 569/875” & FAKE “legislative act/resolution/regulation”
DIRECT INDEPENDENT ATTACK ON ORGANIZED GOVERNMENT CRIMES:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Ex Rel. et al. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al.
DEF. JOHN E. STEELE OBSTRUCTED JUSTICE & PERVERTED FLORIDA LAW
1. A judgment, order, or decree does NOT become a lien on real property unless the address of
the person who has a lien as a result of such judgment, order, or decree is contained in the
judgment, order, or decree or an affidavit with such address is simultaneously recorded with
the judgment, order, or decree, § 55.10, Florida Statutes.
PUBLICLY RECORDED NOTICES OF ORGANIZED JUDICIAL CRIMES
2. Multiple publicly recorded NOTICES, and NOTICES OF APPEAL such as, e.g., Doc. ##
427, 428, had given this Court repeated notice and conclusive proof of, e.g., publicly
recorded organized Government and judicial crimes, racketeering, extortion,
retaliation, obstruction of justice, bribery, and corruption.
PATTERN, POLICY, AND CUSTOM OF ORGANIZED CRIME & CORRUPTION
3. However, this Court and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit only intensified their
publicly recorded retaliation, obstruction of justice, oppression, racketeering, and
extortion. See, e.g., Doc. ## 435, 434, 425, 426. Said Courts are operating just like crime
organizations. Public records and conclusive record evidence mean absolutely nothing.
Silencing, shutting up, threatening, intimidating, punishing, and sanctioning
whistleblowers such as here, e.g., the Plaintiff Appellant Dr. Jorg Busse are the policy,
custom, and pattern of said corrupt Courts.
DEF. JOHN E. STEELE EXTENDED EXTORTION & RACKETEERING SCHEME
4. Here, there had been NO judgment in the falsified amount of “$5,000.00” and/or
“$5,048.60”. Here, there had been NO “July 29, 2009” judgment, order, or decree. Here,
there had only been a final mandate and money judgment for “copies” under Rule 39,
Fed.R.App.P., in the amount of $24.30, Doc. # 365. Here, Dr. Jorg Busse had paid the
$24.30 for the “copies” to Defendant Appellee K. M. Wilkinson. Therefore here, Defendant
Racketeer Kenneth M. Wilkinson had NO lien, and the “motion for entry of order directing
public sale of real property”, Doc. # 432, was a prima facie racketeering, extortion, and
fraud scheme of record, civil RICO provisions.
2
DEF. STEELE CONCEALED PERJURY & GOVERNMENT EXTORTION SCHEME
5. Here, Defendant Steele fraudulently concealed that the fraudulent “Affidavit” by Def. Jack
N. Peterson had falsified a fake “July 29, 2009” “judgment” “in Docket 08-13170-BB”.
6. Here, CASE No. 2008-13170-BB had been CLOSED on 06/11/2009. See said Case Docket.
7. Here, Defendant Steele fraudulently concealed that NOTHING could have possibly
“become a lien on real property” and/or on Plaintiff(s)’ riparian Parcel, S-T-R-A-P # 12-44-
20-01-00015.015A, PB 3 PG 25 (1912) pursuant to § 55.10, Florida Statutes.
PUBLICLY RECORDED LACK OF ANY “lien” and “writ of execution”
8. Here, Defendant Appellee Forger and Racketeer K. M. Wilkinson
a. NEVER had any lien;
b. NEVER was the holder of said forged judgment.
9. Here, Defendant Steele fraudulently concealed that the facially fraudulent “writ of
execution”, Doc. # 425:
a. Was a prima facie extortion and racketeering scheme;
b. Perverted $24.30 into the falsified amount of “5,048.60”;
c. Had NOT been witnessed by any U.S. Judge.
10. Plaintiff Dr. Jorg Busse had asserted and conclusively proven in his Third Amended
Complaint, Doc. ## 282, 288:
“24. Without title evidence in the public Grantor/Grantee Index, Defendant [Kenneth
M. Wilkinson; Property Appraiser] conspired to concoct un-platted lot A (Property
I.D. 12-44-20-01-00000.00A0), block 1 (Property I.D. 07-44-21-01-00001.0000), and
park.” Id., p. 24. See attached Exhibits, USA, Ex Rel. et al. v. USA et al.
CONSPIRACY TO PERVERT & CORRUPT FLORIDA LAW & OFFICIAL RECORDS
11. Defendant Crooked Judge Steele conspired with other Judges, Defendants, and Officials to
pervert official records, documents, and Florida law. Here, e.g., s. 55.10, Fla. Stat. stated:
“55.10 Judgments, orders, and decrees; lien of all, generally; extension of

liens; transfer of liens to other security.--
3
(1) A judgment, order, or decree becomes a lien on real property in any county
when a certified copy of it is recorded in the official records or judgment lien
record of the county, whichever is maintained at the time of recordation, provided
that the judgment, order, or decree contains the address of the person who has a
lien as a result of such judgment, order, or decree or a separate affidavit is
recorded simultaneously with the judgment, order, or decree stating the address
of the person who has a lien as a result of such judgment, order, or decree. A
judgment, order, or decree does not become a lien on real property unless the
address of the person who has a lien as a result of such judgment, order, or decree
is contained in the judgment, order, or decree or an affidavit with such address is
simultaneously recorded with the judgment, order, or decree.”
FRAUDULENT PRETENSES AND OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE & FILINGS
12. Defendant Corrupt U.S. Judge John Edwin Steele fraudulently pretended, Doc. # 434:
“This matter comes before the Court on review of defendant’s Motion for Entry of
Order Directing Public Sale of Real Property (Doc. # 432) filed on May 21, 2010. No
response has been filed and the time to respond has expired. Upon review, the Court
desires a response from plaintiff.”
Here over and over again, Plaintiff Dr. Jorg Busse and Jennifer Franklin Prescott had
“filed”, e.g., multiple “responses”, court actions, appeals to directly attack, defend
against, and expose Defendant Crooked U.S. Judge John E. Steele’s publicly recorded:
a. Racketeering;
b. Extortion;
c. Obstruction of justice;
d. Deliberate deprivations;
e. Acceptance of bribes;
f. Fraud upon the State and Federal Courts;
g. Destruction and alteration of Court records;
h. Corruption.
See attached Exhibit of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Ex Rel. et al. v. UNITED
STATES et al., as filed in U.S. District Court.
DEF. STEELE’S RECKLESS DECEPTION AND FRAUD ON THE COURT
13. Def. Steele recklessly deceived the Court, because he disallowed the Plaintiffs to “respond”
and then fraudulently pretended that the Plaintiffs had purportedly not responded. However
as a matter of record, the Plaintiffs had published conclusive evidence of their filed
“responses” worldwide. Here, more than one Million readers had read the “responses”,
4
which Def. Crook Steele had destroyed, altered, and rejected, and caused others to
destroy, alter, and reject. See, e.g., Google and YouTube.
DEF. STEELE OBSTRUCTED PLAINTIFFS’ COURT ACCESS – FRAUD ON COURT
14. As part of a criminal organization, Def. Steele fabricated and conspired to fabricate a
publicly recorded “card house of judicial shit”:
“In this regard, some of the allegations in the Third Amended Complaint are
contradicted by the resolution which is attached to it. The copy of the Resolution
attached to the Third Amended Complaint establishes that it was signed, executed,
and duly recorded in the public records, and plaintiff will not be allowed to assert
otherwise.” See Doc. # 338, p. 12.
Here, no authentic genuine “resolution” was “attached to the Third Amended Complaint”,
Doc. ## 288, 282. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 44, there was a lack of any publicly recorded
“resolution”. No genuine resolution had ever legally existed; none had ever been legally
recorded.
Here by not allowing the Plaintiffs to assert otherwise, Def. Steele recklessly deprived the
Plaintiffs of any opportunity of justice. Here, Def. Criminal Steele perpetrated fraud on the
Court, covered up, and concealed Government crimes.
Just like other crime organizations, Steele relied on silencing his opponents, retaliation,
intimidation, and injury.
15. In “the Third Amended Complaint”, the Plaintiff(s) had “asserted” and conclusively proven,
e.g., the:
a. Prima facie illegality of the fictitious “resolution”, “O.R. 569/875”;

b. Prima facie nullity of the fake “resolution”;
c. Prima facie criminality of the falsified “resolution”.
16. Only a “court judgment” could have possibly transferred title to Government and/or Lee
County. Here on its face, the facially forged “resolution” was
a. Not any court judgment;
b. Not any muniment of title;
c. Not any genuine instrument:
d. Not any conveyance;
e. Not authentic.
5
RACKETEERING, EXTORTION, DECEPTION, AND FRAUD ON THE COURT
17. Therefore, any “resolution” – forged or genuine – would have been, and could have only
been, entirely irrelevant, immaterial to any involuntary title transfer, because only a court
judgment could have possibly divested the Plaintiffs of their private riparian street easement
and street land on the Gulf, PB 3 PG 25 (1912), against their will.
DEF. CROOK STEELE HAD NO AUTHORITY TO SILENCE THE PLAINTIFFS
18. Here in exchange for bribes, Def. Criminal Steele perverted supreme law and “disallowed“
the Plaintiffs to assert the truth and public record evidence without which any justice was
absolutely impossible.
19. The Plaintiff(s) do not submit to said Criminal on the bench just like they would not submit
to a Roman Catholic priest demanding to fuck the Plaintiff(s) in the ass. Here, the Plaintiffs
defended against organized Government crimes & sodomy and sued Defendant Racketeer J.
E. Steele in Federal Court.
20. Here on the record, Def. Crook Steele adopted the policies and custom of crime
organizations such as, e.g., silencing opponents, retaliation, intimidation, racketeering,
extortion, and injury.
DEF. RACKETEER STEELE’S FACIALLY IDIOTIC & ILLEGAL “order”, DOC. # 434
21. No intelligent, rational, fit, and reasonable judge and/or person in Def. Crooked Judge
Steele’s shoes could have possibly allowed the fake “writ of execution”, Doc. # 425, and the
facially fraudulent “public sale” motion, Doc. # 432.
22. Any enforcement of a non-existent “judgment” against Dr. Busse by “public sale” of said
adjoining riparian street land and private implied street easement on the Gulf of Mexico
would have been absolutely impossible, if the record title had been in the name of
“Government” and/or Lee County.
6
23. “Publicly selling” the very riparian street land and private Gulf-front street easement, PB
3 PG 25 (1912), which Lee County had fraudulently “claimed” to “own” [but never did and
could not possibly have owned as a matter of law] further exposed and conclusively proved
the prima facie idiotic and criminal mind of Def. Racketeer John Edwin Steele.
Emboldened by absolute power and public corruption, Def. Steele continued his record
“Government shit flies-policy”, Doc. # 434.
IDIDOCY & IMPOSSIBILITY OF “public sale of real property”
24. One of the legal issues had been Plaintiff(s)’ unimpeachable record ownership of the
platted riparian street land and implied private street easement adjoining Plaintiffs’ upland on
the Gulf of Mexico, S-T-R-A-P 12-44-20-01-00015.015A (Lot 15A, Cayo Costa) as legally
described and perfectly conveyed to Plaintiff Dr. Busse and J. Franklin Prescott in reference
to the 1912 Plat of Survey of the private undedicated “Cayo Costa” Subdivision in Lee
County Plat Book 3, Page 25. See Plaintiffs’ WARRANTY DEED, Lee County
INSTRUMENT # 2010000171344, which expressly stated the extent of Plaintiff(s)’
conveyance; see PRESCOTT v. STATE OF FLORIDA, 343 Fed. Appx. 395, 396-97 (11th
Circuit Apr. 21, 2009).
FOR BRIBES, DEF. STEELE MADE A MOCKERY OF THE PROCEEDINGS
25. Here as a matter of law, “Public Sale of Real Property”, which Def. Steele had
fraudulently pretended to have been “claimed” by Lee County was absolutely impossible.
Here, Def. Steele made a fool of himself, because that which had been “claimed” by
Government could not be simultaneously “publicly sold”.
BRAZEN FABRICATIONS AND FALSIFICATION OF PUBLIC RECORD
26. Here in his fraudulent “opinion and order”, Doc. # 338, Steele brazenly fabricated and
falsified “Government ownership” without any evidentiary support whatsoever. Def. Steele
knew that “those [fake] lots” had never been “owned by government”, which had been the
7
very issue for the Court’s review. Here, “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0” and “07-44-20-01-
00001.0000” were prima facie fake “land parcels”, which Defendants Steele and Sheri
Polster Chappell could not find on the 1912 Cayo Costa Plat, PB 3 PG 25, because they had
been forged by Defendant Kenneth M. Wilkinson. See Transcript of November 2007
Hearing before Def. Crooked Judge Polster Chappell.
DEF. CRIMINAL STEELE IN CRIMINAL JUDICIAL ORGANIZATION
27. As a Criminal in this Crime Organization of record, Def. Steele extended the
racketeering and retaliation scheme.
“Third Amended Complaint states that defendants have taken over 200 acres
pursuant to the Resolution, far in excess of his 2.5 acres. The only assertion of
disparate treatment is for those lots owned by government, which plaintiff alleges
did not have their rights taken. However, a private owner such as plaintiff can not be
compared to a public owner such as a government unit. Therefore, no equal
protection claim is stated, and such claims will be dismissed without prejudice.”
See Doc. # 338, p. 13.
28. Here in essence, the scheme was:
“Plaintiffs will not be allowed to assert” “those [fake] lots owned by Government”,
which nobody can find on the Cayo Costa Plat. Plaintiffs will not be allowed to assert
the public record evidence of the non-existence and forgery of said fake “lots”.
Therefore, the case is dismissed and fixed in exchange for bribes.
29. By criminal means of fake “land parcels”, and a fake “resolution”, Defendant Governments
and Officials extorted, defrauded, deprived, and treated the Plaintiffs disparately, while
the Plaintiffs were never even allowed to assert the conclusive record evidence and truth.
Here, there was fraud on the Court, and any and all of Def. Steele’s “orders” were null and
void ab initio.
30. Pleading, e.g., fraud, conspiracy to defraud, deprivations, conspiracy to deprive, forgery
of “land parcels”, and extortion were remedies available in Florida and Federal Courts. See
Doc. ## 288, 282, “Third Amended Complaint”.
8
31. Just like a bungling Government idiot, Defendant Steele concealed and conspired with
other Officials to conceal that, e.g.:
a. Plaintiff(s)’ perfect record title to their adjoining street land never transferred to Lee
County, FL;
b. Plaintiff(s)’ unimpeachable record title could not have possibly transferred under any
existing law or modification thereof, Fed.R.Civ.P. 11;
c. Lee County’s sham “claims” were facially fraudulent and frivolous “claims” for
criminal and illegal purposes of racketeering, retaliation, extortion of money
($5,048.60) and land, and illegal “sale of real property”, Doc. # 434;
d. Lee County never “claimed” and could not have possibly claimed Plaintiff(s)’ street land
under any law;
e. The law did not recognize Lee County’s racketeering & extortion scheme “O.R.
569/875”.
See Chapters 73, 74 (Eminent Domain); 95 (Adverse Possession); 712 (Florida’s self-
enforcing Marketable Record Title Act), Fla. Stat.; Florida’s express Const. Guarantees of
fundamental rights to own real property and exclude Government without, e.g.,
retaliation, extortion, racketeering, oppression, bribery, and public corruption.
32. Because Def. Steele is part of a criminal organization, Def. Steele retaliated and silenced
the Plaintiff(s) in said idiotic, arbitrary, capricious, and malicious manner of public record. In
particular, Steele shut up the Plaintiffs by calling them names such as, e.g., “vexatious”.
33. Only if Plaintiffs’ unimpeachable record title to said riparian street land and private riparian
street easement had never transferred from the Plaintiffs to Lee County and/or Government,
could there possibly be any “public sale” of said private riparian street easement and land
“on the Gulf of Mexico”. See PRESCOTT v. STATE OF FLORIDA, 343 Fed. Appx. 395,
396-97 (11th Circuit Apr. 21, 2009). Here for bribes, and under color of authority, sanctions
and punishment, Def. Steele retaliated and called the Plaintiffs names such as, e.g.,
“vexatious”.
34. Because pursuant to their publicly recorded Warranty Deed, the Plaintiff(s) were the
exclusive record owners and title holders of said street land and private street easement on
the Gulf of Mexico, PB 3 PG 25 (1912), Lee County’s facially criminal and illegal “claims”
9
of a “regulation”, “resolution”, “O.R. 569/875”, fake “land parcels”, et al. had been a prima
facie extortion and racketeering scheme. See UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Ex Rel. et
al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
DEF. JOHN E. STEELE’S FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT AND COVER-UP
35. Under publicly recorded fraudulent pretenses of, e.g., “frivolity”, “vexatiousness”,
“sanctionability”, “lack of jurisdiction”, “ripeness requirements”, et al., Def. Steele covered
up and fraudulently concealed the recorded Government pattern and policy of, e.g.:
a. Racketeering;
b. Extorting “under color of” a fake “July 29, 2009 judgment”;
c. Extorting “under color of” a non-existent “$5,048.60 judgment”;
d. Extorting & defrauding “under color of” fake “land parcels” which could not be found;
e. Extorting & defrauding “under color of” prima facie scam “O.R. 569/875”;
f. Perverting a final “$24.30” money judgment & mandate into a fake “writ of
execution”, Doc. # 425.
DEF. STEELE CONCEALED DEFENDANT’S CRIMINAL AND ILLEGAL MOTION,

DOC. # 432
36. Def. Steele fraudulently concealed the prima facie criminality and illegality of Doc. #
432: Here, no genuine “$5,048.60” and/or $5,000.00 money mandate” had ever existed,
because, e.g.:
a. The 11th Circuit had lost jurisdiction on 06/11/2009;
b. The only and final mandate was in the amount of “$24.30”, Doc. # 365;
c. Def. Appellee Wilkinson had never filed any Rule 38 motion;
d. The $24.30 money judgment pursuant to Rule 39, Fed.R.App.P., had become final on
June 15, 2009, Doc. # 365;
e. No Bill of Costs for “$5,000.00” and/or “$5,048.60” had ever existed or could have
possibly existed. See FED.R.CIV.P. 54; 28 U.S.C. 1921-1928; FRAP 39: LOCAL RULE
4.18:
“LOCAL RULE 4.18 APPLICATIONS FOR COSTS OR ATTORNEY'S FEES
(a) In accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 54, all claims for costs or attorney's fees
preserved by appropriate pleading or pretrial stipulation shall be asserted by separate
motion or petition filed not later than fourteen (14) days following the entry of
judgment. The pendency of an appeal from the judgment shall not postpone the filing
of a timely application pursuant to this rule.”
J. E. STEELE & B. B. MARTIN FABRICATED “writ of execution”, DOC. # 425, 434, 435
37. In the recorded presence of a final “$24.30” money judgment issued as mandate on
06/11/2009 for costs of Appellees’ copies, Doc. # 365, and in the record absence of any
“$5,048.60 judgment”, Def. Steele knew and fraudulently concealed that the fake “writ of
10
execution”, Doc. # 425, had been falsified and was null and void. On its very face, no U.S.
judge and no witness had appeared on the falsified “writ”, Doc. # 425.
CONSPIRACY TO COVER UP AND CONCEAL GOVERNMENT CRIMES
38. Def. Steele conspired with other Government Officials and Defendants to cover up and
fraudulently conceal the prima facie criminality, illegality, and nullity of, e.g.:
a. Fake “$5,048.60 judgment”;

b. Fake “land parcels” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0” and “07-44-21-01-00001.0000”;
c. Fake “land claim” “O.R. 569/875”;
d. Fake “resolution”, fake “resolution 569/875”;
e. Fake “regulation”, fake “land use regulation”;
f. Fake “regulatory taking” in the recorded absence of any “regulation”;
g. Fake “inverse condemnation” while Plaintiffs objected to and defended against any
involuntary title transfer to Lee County;
h. Fake “eminent domain” claims in the record absence of any condemnation proceedings.
39. Here, Government and judicial racketeering, extortion, obstruction of justice & court
access, bribery, public corruption, fraud, and deliberate deprivations did not, and could
not possibly, involuntarily divest the Plaintiff(s) of their record title to riparian Parcel “12-44-
20-01-00015.015A” on the Gulf of Mexico.
§ 55.10 REQUIRED A JUDGMENT - NO LIEN ON PROPERTY
40. Under Florida law, a non-existent judgment did not become, and could not have possibly
become a lien on real property. Here, section 55.10 could not have possibly applied to a
non-existent “mandate”. Here, the final mandate of $24.30” for “copies”, Doc. # 365, had
been paid. See Affidavits on file. Furthermore here, Defendant Steele fraudulently
concealed that
“A judgment, order, or decree does not become a lien on real property unless the
address of the person who has a lien as a result of such judgment, order, or decree is
contained in the judgment, order, or decree …” See Ch. 55, Florida Statutes.
Here, judicial Defendants knew and fraudulently concealed that there could not have
possibly been any lien on real property and/or on Plaintiffs’ property.
11
OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, BRIBERY, AND RACKETEERING
41. In exchange for bribes, Defendant Racketeer John E. Steele silenced the Plaintiffs and kept
them away from the Court:
a. Disallowed the Plaintiffs to assert the truth and conclusive public record evidence;
b. Removed Plaintiffs’ State action to Federal Court;
c. Removed and destroyed Plaintiffs’ State Court records;
d. Unlawfully sanctioned and punished the Plaintiffs;
e. Arbitrarily & capriciously denied the Plaintiffs equal electronic court access;
f. Illegally enjoined the Plaintiffs from filing their pleadings;
g. Rejected Plaintiffs’ pleadings;
h. Caused the Def. Clerk to alter and destroy Court records and crime evidence;
i. Retaliated against the Plaintiffs;
j. Caused the Def. U.S. Marshal to threaten, intimidate, and harass the Plaintiffs.
CONSPIRACY TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE & PERPETRATE FRAUD ON THE COURTS

42. Defendant John Edwin Steele conspired with, e.g., Defendant Crooked U.S. Judge Charlene
E. Honeywell and other Officials to shut up the Plaintiffs by criminal and illegal means of,
e.g.:
a. Enjoining Plaintiffs from filing their pleadings [“Pre-filing injunction”];

b. Destroying Plaintiffs’ pleadings
c. Rejecting Plaintiffs’ pleadings;
d. Falsifying a “regulation”;
e. Fabricating “law”;
f. Concocting a fictitious involuntary title transfer to Lee County absent any court
judgment.
FINAL 06/11/2009 MANDATE
43. The 11th Circuit decided Case 2008-13170-BB by opinion entered on “03/05/2009”. On
06/11/2009, the Defendant Clerk of said Appellate Court filed the mandate, which consisted
of a copy of the opinion and a judgment that had been drafted and signed by a Clerk of said
Court, and directions as to costs in the amount of $24.30. See Fed.R.App.P. 41.
44. The Clerk of the Court signed her name on a copy of the judgment, which was stamped
"ISSUED AS MANDATE 06/11/2009" and CLOSED SAID CASE on 06/11/2009.
CONSPIRACY TO COVER UP & CONCEAL ORGANIZED CRIME & EXTORTION
45. Here, Defendants Beverly B. Martin, Kenneth M. Wilkinson, John E. Steele, Sheri Polster
Chappell, Sherri L. Johnson, Jack N. Peterson conspired to cover up and conceal that
12
a. No “$5,048.60 judgment”, “order”, or “decree” had ever been entered.
b. No “$5,048.60 judgment” had ever been issued as mandate.
c. No “$5,048.60 judgment” had ever been received by the U.S. District Court.
d. No “$5,048.60 judgment” had ever been recorded by the U.S. District Court Clerk.
J. E. STEELE’S, S. P. CHAPPELL’S & B. MARTIN’S RACKETEERING OF RECORD
46. Dr. Jorg Busse and Jennifer Franklin Prescott are suing Defendant Racketeer John Edwin
Steele for, e.g., racketeering, extortion, retaliation, fraud, and reckless deprivations.
JOHN E. STEELE’S EXTORTION ON THE PUBLIC RECORD
47. Def. Racketeer John E. Steele perverted a publicly recorded $24.30 money judgment
(“issued as mandate June 11, 2009”) into a $5,048.60 and real property extortion scheme
and conspiracy. See Doc. ## 434, 435, 425, 422, 365, 386, 288, 282, 1, 25, 338.
RACKETEER JOHN E. STEELE’S RECORD RETALIATION
48. By criminal means of falsifying a fake “$5,048.60 judgment”, Def. Corrupt Judge Steele
retaliated against Plaintiffs Dr. Jorg Busse & J. Franklin Prescott, Doc. ## 434, 425, 435.
RACKETEER JOHN E. STEELE’S CONCEALMENT OF $24.30 JUDGMENT
49. Def. U.S. Racketeer John E. Steele fraudulently concealed the publicly recorded $24.30
money judgment “issued as mandate June 11, 2009”, Doc. ## 365; 434, 435, 422, 425, 338.
CONSPIRACY TO EXTORT AND RETALIATE
50. Racketeer John E. Steele conspired with other Government Officials and Defendants to
extort “$5,048.60”, Dr. Jorg Busse’s and Jennifer Franklin Prescott’s riparian real property,
and Hundreds of Acres of land and implied private easements under, e.g., false and
fraudulent pretenses of fake “land parcels” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0” and “07-44-20-01-
00001.0000”, and “under color of” prima facie forged and fraudulent “O.R. 569/875”.
STEELE CONCEALED RECORD ABSENCE OF FAKE PARCELS AND JUDGMENT
13
51. Defendant Crooked U.S. Judge John E. Steele could not locate said fake “land parcels” on
the 1912 Plat of Survey of the private undedicated residential Cayo Costa Subdivision in Lee
County Plat Book 3, Page 25.
CONSPIRACY TO CONCEAL LACK OF ANY RECORD OF FAKE “LAND PARCELS”
52. Def. Extortionist John E. Steele conspired with other Officials and Defendants to
fraudulently conceal the lack of any “$5,048.60 judgment” and said fake “land parcels”.
DOCUMENTATION OF FINAL $24.30 MONEY JUDGMENT (JUNE 15, 2009)
53. The publicly recorded $24.30 money judgment “issued as mandate June 11, 2009”, Doc.
## 365 (pp. 1), “documented”:
a. In-House Reproduction of Appellee’s Brief;

b. No. of Original Pages: “18”;
c. Total No. of Documents Reproduced: “11 (9)”;
d. Total No. of Copies: “198”;
e. Costs Requested: “$29.70”.
f. Costs Allowed: “$24.30”.
54. Here, no “sanctions”, no “fees”, and no “$5,048.60” had ever been “documented”.
DEF. RACKETEER STEELE’S FALSIFCATION OF “writ of execution”, DOC. # 425
55. In the record absence of any “$5,048.60 judgment” against Dr. Jorg Busse, no “witness” and
no “United States Judge” appeared on the face of the falsified “writ of execution”, Doc. #
425, Case 2:2007-cv-00228. See also scam Doc. ## 434, 435, 425, 422, 338.
DEF. RACKETEER JOHN EDWIN STEELE’S OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE
56. For criminal and illegal purposes of concealing racketeering and extortion, Defendant
Crooked Judge John E. Steele had obstructed justice and Plaintiff(s)’ Court access, Doc. #
422. In Doc. # 434, 07/22/10, Def. Steele pretended:
“No response has been filed and the time to respond has expired. Upon review, the
Court desires a response from plaintiff…”
14
RECORDED & PUBLISHED RACKETEERING & EXTORTION
$24.30 MONEY JUDGMENT ISSUED AS MANDATES JUNE 11, 2009
57. The publicly recorded $24.30 money judgment “issued as mandate June 11, 2009”. See
Doc. ## 365 (p. 1), 386-3 (p. 1).
$24.30 MONEY JUDGMENT UNDER FRAP 39, COSTS
58. The $24.30 money judgment was awarded pursuant to Rule 39, Fed.R.App.P.
COPY OF $24.30 MONEY JUDGMENT, DOC. # 386-3
59. A copy of the final $24.30 money judgment issued as mandate was included in Defendant
Appellee’s facially fraudulent “motion for issuance of a writ of execution”, Doc. # 386. See
pages 10 and 24.
60. Of the $29.70 requested in Racketeer Wilkinson’s Bill of Costs, Doc. # 386, the 11th Circuit
allowed $24.30 for Costs under FRAP 39:
$24.30 WERE THE ALLOWED ACTUAL AND NECESSARY COSTS
61. Here, $24.30 were the allowed actual and necessary costs.
$24.30 MONEY JUDGMENT BECAME FINAL ON JUNE 15, 2009
62. Pursuant to Doc. ## 365 (p. 1), 386-3 (p. 1), the U.S. District Court received and filed the
$24.30 money judgment on June 15, 2009:
15
RACKETEERING: EXTORTION OF MONEY:
“FRIVOLOUS APPEAL” MOTION WAS ADMITTEDLY NEVER FILED
63. Defendant Racketeer Wilkinson extorted money, Doc. # 386, by fraudulently pretending
a Rule 38 motion, which Wilkinson knew he had never filed:
“The Judgment
4. On August 22, 2008, Wilkinson filed a Motion for Sanctions pursuant to Eleventh
Circuit Rule 27-4 …”
Said Rule 27-4 motion could not have possibly been for a “frivolous appeal”.
THE 11th CIRCUIT HAD CLOSED CASE ON 06/11/2009
64. The 11th Circuit had CLOSED THE CASE on 06/11/2009:
BRIBERY
65. Here, Defendant Appellee K. M. Wilkinson and his Attorney had no right to bribe the 11th
Circuit and illegally cause the 11th Circuit to fraudulently alter the recorded final $24.30
mandate after the CASE HAD BEEN CLOSED and the 11th Circuit had LOST
JURISDICTION.
DEFENDANT’S APPELLEE’S RACKETEETING AND EXTORTION WERE ILLEGAL
66. Def. Wilkinson’s record racketeering and extortion were illegal and unauthorized by
law.
16
RACKETEERING & EXTORTION IN VIOLATION OF:
FED.R.CIV.P. 54; LOCAL RULE 4.18; 28 U.S.C. 1921-1924; FRAP 39
67. The $24.30 money judgment pursuant to Rule 39, Fed.R.App.P., became final on June 15,
2009.
“LOCAL RULE 4.18 APPLICATIONS FOR COSTS OR ATTORNEY'S FEES

(a) In accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 54, all claims for costs or attorney's fees
preserved by appropriate pleading or pretrial stipulation shall be asserted by separate
motion or petition filed not later than fourteen (14) days following the entry of
judgment. The pendency of an appeal from the judgment shall not postpone the filing
of a timely application pursuant to this rule.”
DEF. WILKINSON VIOLATED REQUIREMENTS UNDER 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920-1924
68. With wanton disregard for Plaintiff(s)’ rights and due process, Def. Wilkinson violated the
law and Rules:
The $24.30 money judgment was unauthorized by law.

Itemization was for $24.30.
No documentation for $24.30.
The record unauthorized Bill of Costs was for $24.30.
Bill of Costs must be verified as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1924.
No known affidavit.
Plaintiff(s) objected to the unauthorized $24.30 money judgment.
The unauthorized $24.30 money judgment was procured through, e.g., publicly
recorded racketeering and extortion by illegal and criminal means of fraud and
extortion scheme “O.R. 569/875”, and facially forged “land parcels” “00A0” and
“00001”. See RICO Complaint in U.S. District Court.
RACKETEERING & EXTORTION IN VIOLATION OF:
FRAP 39 [FED.R.APP.P. 39]
69. A copy of Rule 39, Fed.R.App.P., is attached.
“(d) Bill of Costs: Objections; Insertion in Mandate.

(1) A party who wants costs taxed must — within 14 days after entry of
judgment — file with the circuit clerk, with proof of service, an itemized and
verified bill of costs.”
70. Here, the “judgment”, No. 2008-13170-BB had been “entered: March 5, 2009”, Doc. ##
365, 386. Defendant Appellee Wilkinson had filed with the circuit clerk a $24.30 Bill of
17
Costs. “Date signed” was “3-17-2009”, which was “issued on: Jun 11 2009”, Doc. ## 365,
386, Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228.
71. No “proof of service” existed on the record.
72. The “14 days after entry of judgment” on “March 5, 2009” had expired on March 19,
2009.
APPEAL BECAME FINAL ON JUN 15, 2009
73. An appeal becomes final on the date the mandate is issued. Here, the judgment entered
March 5, 2009 was issued as mandate Jun 11 2009.
74. Since the clerk had responsibilities for entering a judgment, Fed.R.App.P. 36, and for
taxation of costs, Fed.R.App.P. 39(d), the duty to issue the mandate contemplated by Rule 41
was the responsibility of the clerk.
75. The Eleventh Circuit has held that the action becomes final on the date the district court
receives the appellate court's mandate. See U.S. v. Lasteed, 832 F.2d 1240-43 (11th Cir.
1987). The District Court received and filed the Appellate Court’s June 11, 2009 mandate on
JUN 15 2009 when the Appeal, No. 2008-13170-BB, became final. Thereafter, the 11th
Circuit had no jurisdiction as a matter of law. Here, there have been publicly recorded
racketeering and extortion by Government Agents.
NO 11th CIRCUIT JURISDICTION AFTER JUN 15, 2009
76. Jurisdiction followed the mandate. “The effect of the mandate is to bring the proceedings
in a case on appeal in our Court to a close and to remove it from the jurisdiction of this
Court, returning it to the forum whence it came.” It was the date on which the $24.30
mandate was received and filed, Jun 15, 2009, which determined when the district court
reacquired jurisdiction for further proceedings.
77. Issuance of the $24.30 mandate on June 11, 2009, and the District Court’s receipt and filing
on June 15, 2009 was an event of considerable institutional significance. A mandate could
18
NOT possibly “simply” "issue", because it should have been issued, or because the panel may
have intended it to issue, or because the statute commands it to issue. See F.R.App.P. 27, 41.
ADOPTION BY REFERENCE OF FEDERAL LAWSUIT, CIVIL RICO…
78. The Plaintiffs hereby adopt by reference their attached Federal action in this published
Government Racketeering and Corruption Notice, USA, Ex Rel et al. v. USA et al.
WILKINSON’S RACKETEERING, RETALIATION, AND COERCION
79. Defendant Racketeer Wilkinson retaliated on or around August 20, 2008, Doc. # 386-2:
“In order to discourage the Appellant from engaging in the same practices …”
80. Wilkinson coerced Plaintiff Appellant to refrain from rightful prosecution for prima facie
criminal and illegal purposes of concealing crimes and covering up.
CRIMINAL AND ILLEGAL FALSIFICATIONS
81. Just like Defendant Racketeer Wilkinson had falsified fake “land parcels”, and a fake “real
property transaction”, “O.R. 569/875”, Defendant Forger Wilkinson falsified a fake
“judgment”; “July 29, 2009 in Docket 08-13170-BB against Appellant JORG BUSSE in the
amount of $5,048.60.” See, e.g., INSTR 4371834, O.R. 4517 PG 1914, Collier County
Circuit Court.
82. Here, Defendant Racketeer Wilkinson could not have possibly held that which had never
existed. Here, said $24.30 money judgment had been the final mandate, and the facially
null and void “writ of execution”, Doc. # 425, was a prima facie racketeering and
extortions scheme just like the fake “regulation”, fake “legislative act” and/or “O.R.
569/875” that had never legally existed and never been legally recorded.
RACKETEERING-EXTORTION-FRAUD SCHEMES, DOC ## 432, 434, 435
83. Plaintiff Dr. Jorg Busse attached a copy and Exhibits of prima facie racketeering-
extortion-fraud schemes, Documents ## 432, 434, and 435, and adopted them by
reference in this NOTICE OF APPEAL and EMERGENCY MOTIONS.

19
FRAUDULENT ATTACHMENT OF FICTITIOUS DEBT TO CAYO COSTA LAND
84. The publicly recorded and facially fraudulent attachment of a fake judgment and/or debt
to Plaintiff(s)’s Lee County property was a criminal and illegal scheme.
DECEPTION, TRICKERY, AND FRAUDULENT MEMORANDUM
85. Jack N. Peterson and Def. Appellee K. M. Wilkinson conspired to perpetrate fraud on the
Courts and attach a sanctionable “memorandum” to their unlawful motion, Doc. # 432.
“TRANSFER” PURSUANT TO FLORIDA LAW
86. Here, there had been NO lien. Here, Def. Wilkinson did NOT have any lien. Here, Def.
Wilkinson had NOT been any “$5,048.60 judgment holder”. Here, there had been NO
affidavit as required by section 55.10, Fla. Stat.
87. Here that which did NOT exist and/or was NULL and VOID could NOT have possibly been
enforced under Florida law.
88. If there had been any authentic judgment, any valid order, and any genuine lien, Plaintiff(s)
would have been entitled to “transfer” under Florida law, s. 55.10, Fla. Stat.:
“(5) Any lien claimed under this section may be transferred, by any person having an
interest in the real property upon which the lien is imposed or the contract under which
the lien is claimed, from such real property to other security by either depositing in the
clerk's office a sum of money or filing in the clerk's office a bond executed as surety by a
surety insurer licensed to do business in this state. Such deposit or bond shall be in an
amount equal to the amount demanded in such claim of lien plus interest thereon at the
legal rate for 3 years plus $500 to apply on any court costs which may be taxed in any
proceeding to enforce said lien. Such deposit or bond shall be conditioned to pay any
judgment, order, or decree which may be rendered for the satisfaction of the lien for
which such claim of lien was recorded and costs plus $500 for court costs. Upon such
deposit being made or such bond being filed, the clerk shall make and record a certificate
showing the transfer of the lien from the real property to the security and mail a copy
thereof by registered or certified mail to the lienor named in the claim of lien so
transferred, at the address stated therein. Upon the filing of the certificate of transfer,
the real property shall thereupon be released from the lien claimed, and such lien shall be
transferred to said security. The clerk shall be entitled to a service charge of up to $15 for
making and serving the certificate. If the transaction involves the transfer of multiple
liens, an additional service charge of up to $7.50 for each additional lien shall be charged.
Any number of liens may be transferred to one such security.”
20
NO service OF ANY “writ of execution” UPON DR. JORG BUSSE
89. Here, Dr. Jorg Busse was never served and could not have possibly been served [with] any
“writ of execution”. No evidence of any service existed on the record. Doc. ## 425, 429, 430,
were facially fraudulent and for criminal and illegal purposes of, e.g., racketeering,
extortion, retaliation, obstruction of justice, and unconstitutional property seizure in
brazen violation of, e.g., the 4th, and 14th U.S. Constitutional Amendments, and Chapters
55, and 56, Florida Statutes.
MANDATORY SUSPENSION OF ANY ENFORCEMENT PROCEEDINGS
90. Under color of a prima facie falsified “writ of execution”, Doc. ## 425, 435, 434 and in the
publicly recorded absence of any debt, and after Dr. Jorg Busse had paid the final
mandate of $24.30 for “copies” (under FRAP 39) to Def. Wilkinson, the Def. U.S. Marshal
and Defendants Richard Jessup and Ryan Barry recklessly extended, e.g., the extortion,
racketeering, and organized crimes of public record in order to retaliate against Dr. Busse,
extort fees and said real property without any authority and for organized and conspiratorial
criminal purposes. Here, said Officials coerced the Plaintiff(s) to refrain from rightful
prosecution and obstructed justice. Here, any and all Marshal(s), Sheriff(s), and/or law
enforcement Officials were under the absolute obligation to NOT enforce and/or suspend
any proceedings on the illegal execution of the facially fraudulent and forged “writ”, Doc.
## 425, which had never been served upon Dr. Busse.
AFFIDAVIT; DEMAND FOR MANDATORY SUSPENSION OF PROCEEDINGS ON
FRAUDULENT AND ILLEGAL execution, CH. 56, 55, U.S. CONST. AMENDMENTS
91. Here Dr. Jorg Busse had demanded, has been demanding, and again demands the
absolutely mandatory suspension of any proceedings to enforce and/or execute a prima
facie fictitious, un-documented, un-substantiated, un-recorded and null and void debt in
the facially falsified amount of “$24.30”. Here. Dr. Busse had fully paid the $24.30 final
21
money judgment and 06/11/2009 mandate (“copies”). Here, the Defendants and Wilkinson
knew that the 11th Circuit never had any jurisdiction and authority to alter and amend the
“$24.30 mandate/judgment” and to sanction and punish the Plaintiff corruption victim Dr.
Jorg Busse, who rightfully prosecuted Crooked Government Officials.
AFFIDAVIT: ORGANIZED CRIME, RACKETEERING, EXTORTION, CORRUPTION
92. In this organized crime scheme, Defendant Beverly Martin had suspended, and conspired
with, e.g., judicial Def. Steele, Chappell, Lazzara, Pizzo, Honeywell, and other Defendants
and Officials to suspend, the Rules and extended anarchy and lawlessness to obtain
unlawful benefits. Here, Def. Crooked Judge Martin recklessly violated Section 838.022,
Official Misconduct, Fla. Stat.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Government corruption and racketeering victims demand
1. An Order declaring that Defendant K. M. Wilkinson did NOT “have any lien”;
2. An Order declaring that Defendant Wilkinson did NOT “hold any $5,048.60 judgment” as
falsely pretended and falsified by said Defendant Wilkinson and Defendant Crooked
Attorney JACK N. PETERSON [see falsified, fraudulent and deceptive “affidavits”
asserting a fake “July 29, 2009 judgment” in the Collier and Lee County Public Records;
3. An EMERGENCY Order suspending and enjoining as absolutely mandatory any
proceedings on any illegal and criminal execution in violation of, e.g., Chapters 55 and 56,
Fla. Stat., and the 4th, 14th, 1st, and 7th U.S. Const. Amendments, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961 – 1968;
42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242; s. 838.022, Fla. Stat.;
4. An Order sanctioning Defendant Attorney JACK N. PETERSON for recorded perjury and
conspiring with Def. Wilkinson and other Government Officials to extort, racketeer,
retaliate, and deliberately deprive Dr. Jorg Busse and Jennifer Franklin Prescott;
5. An Order declaring the final record mandate in the amount of $24.30 paid;
22
6. An Order vacating and setting aside the facially oppressive and unconstitutional “pre-filing
injunction”, Doc. # 245, Case No. 2:2009-cv-00791, which on its face was for criminal and
illegal purposes of racketeering, retaliation, intimidation, oppression, and “protection” of
the organized Criminals and criminal Defendants in this Court and the 11th Circuit;
7. An Order restraining and preventing the record violations of section 1962 under the RICO
civil provisions;
8. An Order declaring the lack of any recorded mandate and/or money judgment other than the
$24.30, which was “issued as mandate on June 11, 2009” and recorded on June 15, 2009
pursuant to the certified Docket, Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228, U.S. District Court, M.D.
Florida, Fort Myers Division;
9. An Order declaring that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit had lost jurisdiction
on 06/11/2009, as had also been evidenced by its own Case Docket, 08-13170-BB];
10. An Order sanctioning and punishing Defendant Kenneth M. Wilkinson for the publicly
recorded falsifications of, e.g., said fake “judgment”, “land parcels”, fake “resolution”,
extortion, and racketeering, all of which obstructed justice;
11. An Order declaring INSTRUMENT 4371834, O.R. 4517 PG 1914, Collier County Public
Records, and the equally fraudulent filing in Lee County part of a racketeering, extortion,
and fraud scheme
12. An Order restraining any further racketeering by Defendant Government Officials and in
particular the illegal forced selling of Plaintiffs’ said riparian Cayo Costa property, Lot 15A,
in the absence of any recorded “$5,048.60” “judgment”;
13. An Order dissolving and/or reorganizing the corrupt Government enterprise under, e.g., civil
RICO, and 18 U.S.C. 1964(a);
23
14. An Order removing the publicly recorded corrupting influence and make due provision for
said express fundamental rights of innocent persons under the Florida and Federal
Constitutions and, e.g., the 14th, 1st, 7th, 4th, 5th, and 11th U.S. Constitutional Amendments;
15. An EMERGENCY Order recusing Defendant Crooked, Objectively Partial, and Unfit
Government Racketeer John E. Steele;
16. An Order making the Government enterprise of record subject of injunctive relief, because it
is designed to aid the illegal enterprise of, e.g., obstructing justice, retaliating and
punishing, and extorting money, Government fees, and property;
17. An Order enjoining said U.S. Courts from retaliating against the Plaintiffs because they
blew the whistle on Government crimes & corruption, rather than punishing the Defendant
Racketeers of record and providing remedies and relief to the Plaintiff racketeering and
corruption victims;
18. An EMERGENCY Order recusing Defendant Crooked and Objectively Partial and Unfit
Judge C. E. Honeywell;
19. An EMERGENCY Order recusing Defendant Corrupt and Objectively Partial and Unfit
Judge S. Polster Chappell;
20. An Order for equitable relief;
21. An Order declaring Plaintiffs’ record title to Lot 15A, Cayo Costa, free & clear and
unencumbered;
22. An Order declaring fake “land parcels” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0” and “07-44-21-01-
00001.0000” falsified and prima facie forgeries as conclusively evidenced by the 1912
Cayo Costa Plat in Lee County Plat Book 3, Page 25;
23. An Order for EMERGENCY relief from the publicly recorded public corruption, extortion,
coercion, fraud, and concealment in said Courts;
24. An Order for compensatory damages;

24
EXHIBITS
SUPPORTING PUBLIC RECORD EVIDENCE
EXTORTION, FRAUD, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, RETALIATION, BRIBERY …
A. FACIALLY FRAUDULENT AFFIDAVIT [DEF. JACK N. PETERSON, K. M.
WILKINSON] INSTR 4371834, O.R. 4517 PG 1914, Collier County Public Records
B. PRIMA FACIE NULL & VOID “writ of execution”, Case No. 2:07-cv-00228
C. PRIMA FACIE NULL & VOID “O.R. 569/875” AND LAND EXTORTION SCHEME
D. 07/21/2010 letter by Def. Racketeer JACK N. PETERSON
E. Def. CHARLIE GREEN’S recording instructions
F. RACKETEERING AND EXTORTION record evidence, Doc. # 429, Case 2:07-cv-228
G. Docket as CERTIFIED by Def. Diane Nipper on 07/16/2010, Case No. 2:07-cv-00228
Conclusively evidencing record absence of fictitious and fabricated appeal “09-13196”
H. FALSIFICATION of “appeal no. 09-13196” by Def. Beverly B. Martin pursuant to
CERTIFIED docket at B., which evidenced the lack of any such “appeal” and the
“frivolity”-racketeering-and-extortion-scheme of record; “JUL 19 2010” CASE FIXING &
“DISMISSAL AS FRIVOLOUS”
I. DOC. # 434, 07/22/2010, by Def. JOHN E. STEELE, CASE NO. 2:2007-CV-00228
J. Third Amended Complaint, Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228, Doc. # 288, 282 (11 pages),
PRIMA FACIE NULL AND VOID “legislative act” and/or “law”, Fake “O.R. 569/875”,
FACIALLY FALSIFIED “regulation” and/or “resolution” attached as Page 9 of 11;
ETHICS COMPLAINT against Def. Crooked Lee County Official JACK N. PETERSON
Attached as Page 10 of 11
K. PRIMA FACIE FRAUDULENT and FRIVOLOUS motion by Defendant Racketeer and
“land parcel” Forger K. M. Wilkinson; “Appellee Property Appraiser’s Motion for
27
Sanctions for Filing of a frivolous Motion”, “Rule 27-4”, Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228, Doc. #
386-2, pp 1-3, Doc. # 386-3, p. 15
L. BINDING PRECEDENT and RECORD EVIDENCE of OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE,
JUDICIAL RETALIATION, and EXTORTION under color of fake “judgment” & “writ”,
WEST PENINSULAR TITLE CO. v. PALM BEACH COUNTY, 41 F.3d 1490(11th
Cir.1995); Murrell v. United States, 269 F.2d 458 (5th Cir.1959)
M. Lee County, FL, INSTRUMENT # 2010000171344, WARRANTY DEED Lot 15A, “Cayo
Costa, Lee County Plat Book 3, Page 25 (1912) (2 pages)
N. RECORD RACKETEERING EVIDENCE: “Motion for Issuance of writ of execution …”,
RECORDED EVIDENCE of EXTORTION, FRAUD & FALSIFICATION of un-recorded
judgment, Doc. # 386, Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228, by Def. Racketeer Jack N. Peterson;
PERVERSION of recorded “$24.30 judgment” into fake “$5,048.60 debt”
O. Lee County Tax Collector’s Office, Statement of Paid Property Taxes, Lot 15A, Cayo Costa
(2 pages)
P. DENIAL of “Appellee Wilkerson’s Motion to Alter or Amend the Judgment”,
FALSIFICATION of “Rule 38 motion”, record evidence, Doc. # 386-5
FALSIFICATION of “Rule 38 judgment”, record evidence, Doc. # 386-5
FALSIFICATION of “Rule 38 bill of costs”, record evidence, Doc. # 386-5
FALSIFICATION of unsubstantiated “$5,000 in attorney’s fees”, Doc. # 386-5
By Defendant Racketeers Dubina, Chief Judge, Tjoflat, and Birch, Circuit Judges
Facially forged and pasted “certification”, Doc. # 386-5, p. 2, right lower corner
Q. MEMORANDUM OF NO DEDICATION OF THE CAYO COSTA ROADS TO PUBLIC,
From The Office of Lee County, Florida, Attorney, Dec. 29, 2000, Joan C. Henry, Esq.
R. 1912 Plat of undedicated private “Cayo Costa” Subdivision in Lee County Plat Book 3, P. 25
S. Recorded Survey of riparian Lot 15A, Cayo Costa, PB 3 PG 25 (1912) on the Gulf of Mexico
28
T. Fraudulent Lee County Inventory Control File, FALSIFIED parcel 12-44-20-01-00000.00A0
O.R. 1651 / 2488, O.R. 2967 / 1084 – 1090, BLUE SHEET 980206, 03/24/1998(6 pages)
U. Falsified “Parcel 12-44-20-01-00000.00A0” by Def. Racketeer Kenneth M. Wilkinson (2 p)
V. Falsified “resolution”, “legislative act”, and/or “law” by Def. Racketeer John Edwin Steele,
Doc. ## 288, 282, Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228
W. “Judgment Issued as Mandate June 11 2009”, in the amount of $24.30, FRAP 39 (1 p)
RACKETEERING/EXTORTION EVIDENCE: March 5, 2009 “opinion”, 11th Circuit
X. Bill of Costs Issued as Mandate June 11 2009, in the amount of $24.30, FRAP 39 (1 p)
Y. Fraudulent “Conclusion” and Case Fixing by Defendant U.S. Circuit Judges, Doc. # 365,
Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228; Doc. # 386.
Z. STATE Court Docket, Plaintiffs’ Case No. 2006-CA-003185, BUSSE v. STATE OF
FLORIDA, Defendant Judge GERALD, LYNN, Jr., Filed 07/31/2006,
REMOVED to U.S. District Court by Def. Judges John E. Steele and S. Polster Chappell
AA. EXTORTION & PUBLIC CORRUPTION NOTICE to Def. Drew Heathcoat, U.S.
Clerk (2 pages)
BB. Federal Bureau of Investigation Special Agent in Charge, Steven E. Ibison
CC. DESTRUCTION of official records as evidenced by search of “2007-00228”, 11th
Circuit
DD. DESTRUCTION of Docket No. 201010963, U.S. Court of Appeals, 11th Circuit
EE.CASE FIXING, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, AND RETALIATION by Def. Judges
Black, Carnes, and Martin, dated “JUL 19 2010” (2 pages)
FF. NOTICE OF CORRUPTION AND LETTER DEMANDING AUTHENTICATION,
Def. JOHN LEY, U.S. Circuit Clerk, 11th U.S. Appellate Circuit (2 pages)
GG. Motion to Stay Prima Facie Illegal Execution as a Matter of Law, Case No. 2:10-cv-
00390 (5 pages)
29
HH. Section 838.022, Florida Statutes, OFFICIAL MISCONDUCT
Chapter 838, Fla. Stat., BRIBERY, MISUSE OF PUBLIC OFFICE
II. Case No. 2:2010-cv-00089, Doc. # 29, pp. 4, 7, Def. U.S. Attorney, Tony West, Matthew
L. Fesak, affirming U.S. jurisdiction under “civil RICO”
JJ. FACIALLY FALSIFIED “writ of execution”, Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228, Doc. # 425
KK. Section 55.10, Florida Statutes, Judgments…,
Chapter 55 Judgments, Florida Statutes
LL. Defendant Racketeer K. M. Wilkinson’s Answers to Plaintiff’s First Set of
Interrogatories” under oath, 10/22/2007; in particular, asserting under oath the RECORD
ABSENCE of “public Cayo Costa easements”, Answer # 24
MM. Florida 19th Statewide Grand Jury on Public Corruption (09/30/2009 Petition),
Florida Statewide Prosecution Office, Office of the Attorney General of Florida.
NN. FALSIFIED “Plat” of “Cayo Costa Subdivision” as falsified and filed by Defendant
Racketeer K. M. Wilkinson as “Exhibit A”, Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228
OO. Publicly recorded Case Fixing and Obstruction of Justice by Defendant Judges Gerald
B. Tjoflat, Susan Birch, and Joel F. Dubina, Chief Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals, 11th Circuit,
Doc. # 365, Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228
PP. Fraudulent Order, Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228, Doc. # 422, pp. 17-18, by Defendant
Racketeer John E. Steele, evidencing extortion, obstruction of justice, obstruction of court
access, and retaliation under fraudulent pretenses of, e.g., “writ of execution”, “lack of
jurisdiction”, “ripeness requirements”, “frivolity”, “sanctions”, and under color of authority
and office.
QQ. FBI Complaint against Def. Lee County Commissioner John Manning
RR. Concealment of fake writ, Doc. # 434, Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228, by Def. J. E.
Steele
30
SS. FBI Complaint against Def. U.S. Circuit Judge Beverly B. Martin,
Including “JUL 19 2010” CASE FIXING FOR BRIBES and RACKETEERING
TT. Record Evidence of Destruction of Plaintiffs’ Appeal Records, ## “10-10963, 10-10967”
UU. GOVERNMENTAL FORGERIES, “O.R. 569/875”, FORENSIC EVIDENCE
VV. Facially Fraudulent Order, Doc. # 338, Case 2:2007-cv-00228, by Def. John E.
Steele
WW. March 08, 2010 Letter by Def. John Ley, U.S. Circuit Clerk
XX. DESTRUCTION AND ALTERATION OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, EVIDENCE
YY. FRAUDULENT 04/06/2010 Order by Def. Crooked Circuit Judge Beverly B. Martin
ZZ. Supreme Court Justice David Souter Communications, including binding precedent of
WEST PENINSULAR TITLE CO. v. PALM BEACH COUNTY
AAA. OTHER; OTHER PUBLIC RECORDS
31
CC: Federal Bureau of Investigation
U.S. Department of Justice
Eric Holder, Attorney General
Barack Hussein Obama, The White House
Florida Department of Law Enforcement
The Florida Bar
Real Property Probate and Trust Lawyer Section, The Florida Bar
32
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FORT MYERS DIVISION
JORG BUSSE
Plaintiff,
vs. Case No. 2:07-cv-228-FtM-29SPC
LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA; BOARD OF LEE

COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; THE LEE COUNTY
PROPERTY APPRAISER; STATE OF FLORIDA
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL
IMPROVEMENT TRUST FUND, STATE OF
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION,
Defendants.
___________________________________
ORDER
This matter comes before the Court on review of defendant’s
Motion for Entry of Order Directing Public Sale of Real Property
(Doc. #432) filed on May 21, 2010. No response has been filed and
the time to respond has expired.
Upon review, the Court desires a response from plaintiff.
Recognizing that a Pre-Filing Injunction (Case No. 2:09-cv-791-FTM-
36SPC, Doc. #245) was issued on July 20, 2010, prohibiting any
further filings without leave of Court, the Court will grant
plaintiff leave to file a single responsive document to defendant’s
motion.
Accordingly, it is now
ORDERED:
Plaintiff may file one response to defendant’s Motion for
Entry of Order Directing Public Sale of Real Property (Doc. #432)
within FOURTEEN (14) DAYS of this Order. If no response is
received, the Court will rule on the motion without the benefit of
a response and without further notice.
DONE AND ORDERED at Fort Myers, Florida, this 22nd day of
July, 2010.
Copies:
Plaintiff
Counsel of record
-2-

Clerk Heathcoat Obstructs Filing of Notice of Appeal, 08/03/2010

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Clerk Heathcoat Obstructs Filing of Notice of Appeal, 08/03/2010

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Clerk Heathcoat Obstructs Filing of Notice of Appeal, 08/03/2010

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

8/4/2010 Electronic Case Filing | U.S.

Busse v. Lee County, Florida et al Date Filed: 04/10/2007

Linda Kathryn Funchess

Reagan Kathleen Russell

Linda Kathryn Funchess

Reagan Kathleen Russell

Date Filed # Docket Text

PACER Service Center

Federal Bureau of Investigation

USA, Ex Rel. et al. v. USA et al.

Administrative Office of the United States Courts

Defendant Crooked Clerk of Court Drew Heathcoat

DOC. ## 425; 365; 386-4; CASE NO. 2:2007-cv-00228

/s/Jennifer Franklin, Private Attorney General

USA, Ex Rel. et al. v. USA et al.

Defendant Crooked Clerk of Court Drew Heathcoat

RE: DREW HEATHCOAT EXTORTION SCAM, FALSIFIED “$5,048.60 writ”,

/s/Jennifer Franklin, Private Attorney General

Federal Bureau of Investigation

Defendant Drew Heathcoat, Crooked Clerk of Court

RE: EXTORTION OF $5,048.60, DOC. # 425; Def. Drew Heathcoat

/s/Jennifer Franklin, Private Attorney General

DR. JORG BUSSE,

KENNETH M. ROESCH, J.R., et al.,

versus Case # 2:2007-cv-228-FtM-JES-SPC

LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA, et al.,

RACKETEERING, EXTORTION, RETALIATION, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, AND

EMERGENCY MOTION TO ENJOIN “sale of real property”

DIRECT INDEPENDENT ATTACK ON ORGANIZED GOVERNMENT CRIMES:

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Ex Rel. et al. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al.

DEF. JOHN E. STEELE OBSTRUCTED JUSTICE & PERVERTED FLORIDA LAW

the judgment, order, or decree, § 55.10, Florida Statutes.

PUBLICLY RECORDED NOTICES OF ORGANIZED JUDICIAL CRIMES

recorded organized Government and judicial crimes, racketeering, extortion,

retaliation, obstruction of justice, bribery, and corruption.

PATTERN, POLICY, AND CUSTOM OF ORGANIZED CRIME & CORRUPTION

publicly recorded retaliation, obstruction of justice, oppression, racketeering, and

Silencing, shutting up, threatening, intimidating, punishing, and sanctioning

custom, and pattern of said corrupt Courts.

DEF. JOHN E. STEELE EXTENDED EXTORTION & RACKETEERING SCHEME

fraud scheme of record, civil RICO provisions.

20-01-00015.015A, PB 3 PG 25 (1912) pursuant to § 55.10, Florida Statutes.

PUBLICLY RECORDED LACK OF ANY “lien” and “writ of execution”

8. Here, Defendant Appellee Forger and Racketeer K. M. Wilkinson

a. NEVER had any lien;

b. NEVER was the holder of said forged judgment.

execution”, Doc. # 425:

a. Was a prima facie extortion and racketeering scheme;

b. Perverted $24.30 into the falsified amount of “5,048.60”;

c. Had NOT been witnessed by any U.S. Judge.

Complaint, Doc. ## 282, 288:

CONSPIRACY TO PERVERT & CORRUPT FLORIDA LAW & OFFICIAL RECORDS

“55.10 Judgments, orders, and decrees; lien of all, generally; extension of

See attached Exhibit of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Ex Rel. et al. v. UNITED

STATES et al., as filed in U.S. District Court.

DEF. STEELE’S RECKLESS DECEPTION AND FRAUD ON THE COURT

destroy, alter, and reject. See, e.g., Google and YouTube.

DEF. STEELE OBSTRUCTED PLAINTIFFS’ COURT ACCESS – FRAUD ON COURT

publicly recorded “card house of judicial shit”:

Court, covered up, and concealed Government crimes.